https://arxiv.org/api/AMtCtgtS6OZmsskiwM8gfOp5ybQ2026-06-10T15:24:47Z459721015http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16308v2Hamiltonian dynamics of classical spins2025-12-24T16:17:24ZWe discuss the geometry behind classical Heisenberg model at the level suitable for third or fourth year students who did not have the opportunity to take a course on differential geometry. The arguments presented here rely solely on elementary algebraic concepts such as vectors, dual vectors and tensors, as well as Hamiltonian equations and Poisson brackets in their simplest form. We derive Poisson brackets for classical spins, along with the corresponding equations of motion for classical Heisenberg model, starting from the geometry of two-sphere, thereby demonstrating the relevance of standard canonical procedure in the case of Heisenberg model.2025-03-20T16:33:11Z12 pages, 3 figuresPhysics 8, 23 (2026)Slobodan RadoševićSonja GombarMilica RutonjskiPetar MaliMilan Panti\' cMilica Pavkov-Hrvojevi\' c10.3390/physics8010023http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20836v1The Benefits and Challenges of a Quantum Computing Concept Inventory2025-12-23T23:24:51ZA Quantum Computing Concept Inventory is needed for the acceleration of uptake of best practice in quantum computing education required to support the quantum computing workforce for the next two decades. Eight experts in quantum computing, quantum ommunication or quantum sensing were interviewed to determine if there is substantial non-mathematical content to warrant such an inventory and determine a preliminary list of key concepts that should be included in such an inventory. Developing such an inventory is a challenging task requiring significant international 'buy-in' and creativity to produce jargon-free valid questions which are accessible to students who are yet to study quantum mechanics.2025-12-23T23:24:51ZThe Physics Educator 6(02), 2450009 (2024)Lachlan McGinnesshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20713v1How to Do STEM Outreach Evaluation -- Recommendations Based on a Review of Self Evaluation Tools in Canadian STEM Outreach Programs2025-12-23T19:19:56ZSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) outreach programs in Canada, especially those oriented towards youth, play a critical role in supporting the nation's future workforce, innovation capacity, and equity across social groups in STEM fields. They constitute a large, multi-layered ecosystem connecting universities, national laboratories, non profit organizations, and grassroots community groups. Despite the growing importance of these programs, and the frequency that they undergo self-evaluation, little systematic information exists on best practices or common approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of STEM outreach initiatives. To address this gap, we integrated literature review with email inquiries about self evaluation tools sent to Canadian STEM outreach programs funded by NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) PromoScience grants. We contacted 200 programs and heard back from about 100 of them, for a response rate of 50%. Of those respondents, 68 shared information about a formal self-evaluation tool appropriate for general STEM outreach. The results led us to develop a toolbox of self-evaluation methods, master question banks and starting-point templates for student/participant and teacher/chaperone surveys, and a synthesized list of recommendations for evaluation process, design, and implementation. Our approach provides a broad treatment of how to do STEM outreach evaluation, supplementing the relevant literature, where large-N studies and Canadian studies are relatively rare. We acknowledge that some of the most effective practices in STEM outreach evaluation require resources or capacity (e.g. longitudinal approaches), which may be limited for many outreach practitioners, but others seem to have a high ratio of benefit to cost (e.g. adding qualitative questions to an otherwise quantitative survey).2025-12-23T19:19:56ZGarrett RichardsEnvironmental Policy InstituteSvetlana BarkanovaPhysics, of the School of Science and the Environment, Grenfell Campus, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labradorhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19533v1Probability Conservation, Liouville Measure, and the Symplectic Origin of Hamiltonian Dynamics2025-12-22T16:20:33ZLiouville's theorem -- the preservation of phase-space volume -- is often presented as a corollary of Hamilton's canonical equations. Here we adopt an ensemble-first viewpoint in which the starting point is local probability conservation on phase space. For a probability density $ρ$ on a $2N$-dimensional symplectic manifold $(\mathcal{M},ω)$, probability transport is expressed intrinsically with respect to the Liouville volume form $Ω=ω^N/N!$ through a continuity equation defined by the $Ω$-divergence. For Hamiltonian evolution, specified by $ι_{X_H}ω=\mathrm{d}H$, Cartan's identity implies $\mathcal{L}_{X_H}ω=0$ and hence $\mathcal{L}_{X_H}Ω=0$, so the Hamiltonian flow is incompressible in the Liouville sense and the continuity law reduces to Liouville's equation. In canonical coordinates this reproduces Hamilton's equations. In particular, the canonical Poisson-bracket relations $\{q^i,p_j\}=δ^i_{\ j}$ provide the kinematic input that fixes the evolution of observables and underlies the canonical form of the continuity equation. The same organization clarifies the distinction between conservation of total probability and preservation of fine-grained information measures (Gibbs--Shannon entropy), which holds specifically for Liouville-measure-preserving dynamics.2025-12-22T16:20:33ZEnmanuel Rodríguez-BreaMelvin Ariashttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04931v2Visualising Quantum Entanglement Using Interactive Electronic Quantum Dice2025-12-22T07:58:51ZQuantum entanglement remains a challenging concept to teach and visualise due to its microscopic and non-classical nature. We present innovative educational demonstration material consisting of electronic dice that simulate the properties of quantum entanglement through haptic interaction. The system uses displays, orientation sensors, and wireless communication to visualise key quantum mechanical principles such as superposition, measurement, and entanglement correlations. This analogy enables students to experience quantum phenomena through familiar objects, making abstract concepts more tangible. The dice support various educational scenarios, from basic entanglement demonstrations to more complex quantum key distribution experiments, and can be adapted for different educational levels from secondary school to undergraduate physics courses. Initial implementations demonstrate that the interactive nature of the Quantum Dice can help users develop an intuitive understanding of quantum mechanical principles. The low-cost, open source, and robust design makes Quantum Dice accessible to a wider range of educational institutions.2025-10-06T15:40:55Z18 pages, 10 figures, supplementary information available, open source design and codeB. FolkersA. van RossumA. BrinkmanH. K. E. Stadermannhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18886v1Making Quantum Accessible: A Seven-Category Framework for K-12 Quantum Education2025-12-21T20:57:16ZWe conducted a literature review and expert interviews to determine the most common methods being used to teach quantum physics and quantum computing concepts to primary and secondary students. Based on the findings of this review, we provide a framework of seven categories of teaching approaches for teaching mathematically accessible quantum concepts; they are Defamiliarization, Quantum Picturalism, Spin-First Approach, Einstein-First Approach, Many Paths Approach, Historical Development Approach and Game-based Quantum Learning. We summarise each of these teaching methods and overview their advantages and disadvantages of each method. Our framework makes it easy for physics educators to embrace the diverse methods of teaching quantum physics and quantum computing at the primary and secondary level.2025-12-21T20:57:16ZPresented at the International Symposium of Teaching Einsteinian Physics in 10-12 July 2025Rhea FernandezSarah HagstromLiesel MalanosLachlan McGinnessMadeline MitchellSaskia SchultzElizabeth Sextonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17699v1Measuring fidelity of implementation of named active learning methods in physics2025-12-19T15:35:01ZVarious active learning methods have been developed for introductory physics, and these methods are increasingly being adopted by instructors. However, instructors often do not implement these methods exactly as was originally intended by the developers, as they may face issues related to funding and institutional support for active learning and/or have different instructional contexts (e.g., student populations) and environments (e.g., physical classroom layouts) than the developers. Existing research does not sufficiently capture the range of variation in instructor implementation of established active learning methods, especially in comparison to high-fidelity implementations. In this study, we first identify the critical components (i.e., components without which the active learning method cannot be said to have been implemented) of three named active learning methods: SCALE-UP, ISLE, and Tutorials. We then evaluate the fidelity with which 18 different introductory physics instructors implement these methods by analyzing classroom observations and comparing the extent to which these broader implementations use each critical component in their classroom to high-fidelity implementations. We find across all three active learning methods that broader implementations spend similar amounts of class time on the critical components as high-fidelity implementations. At the same time, we observe substantial variation in the specific styles that broader implementers operationalize these critical components (e.g., doing a few long activities versus many short activities). Finally, we find no clear relationship between fidelity of implementation and student conceptual learning gains for our study's sample of instructors, providing preliminary evidence that different ways of implementing the critical components of active learning method may all effectively improve student understanding.2025-12-19T15:35:01ZIbukunoluwa BukolaMeagan SundstromJustin GambrellColin GreenAdrienne L. TraxlerEric Brewehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16838v1Enhancing Kinematics Understanding Through a Real-Time Graph-Based Motion Video Game2025-12-18T18:14:44ZKinematics is a core topic in early physics courses, yet students often struggle to interpret motion and its graphical representations. To tackle these difficulties, we developed MissionMotion, a physical-computational videogame where students reproduce target motion graphs using real-time data from their own movements or from sensors connected through micro:bit or Arduino. The system displays both the target and the user-generated graph, providing immediate visual feedback and a score based on similarity. We piloted the environment with ninth-grade students in different school contexts and evaluated their experience using the MEEGA+ instrument. The results show strong engagement, positive perceptions of usability, and evidence that the game promotes reflection on motion graphs in ways that rarely emerge in traditional lessons. MissionMotion runs on any web-enabled device and all materials are openly available, offering teachers an accessible tool to integrate experimentation, computational thinking, and playful learning into physics classrooms.2025-12-18T18:14:44Z10 pagesMateo DutraMarcos AbreuMartín MonteiroSilvia SguillaCecilia StariAlvaro SuarezArturo C. Martihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17963v1The Bat Signal2025-12-18T16:02:11ZWe present a simple experiment that can be run in class or remotely with minimal materials. Students use the principles of geometric optics to create their own versions of the bat signal.2025-12-18T16:02:11ZPhys. Teach. 62, 612-613 (2024)Keith ZengelAnna Klales10.1119/5.0213457http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16257v1Quantum Readiness in Latin American High Schools: Curriculum Compatibility and Enabling Conditions2025-12-18T07:12:36ZThe accelerating global development of quantum technologies strengthens the case for introducing quantum computing concepts before university. Yet in Latin America, there is no consolidated, region wide integration of quantum computing into secondary education, and the feasibility conditions for doing so remain largely unexamined. This paper proposes a qualitative, comparative framework to assess academic readiness for quantum education across six countries - Peru, Bolivia, Chile, Argentina, Brazil, and Colombia - grounded in the relationship between curriculum compatibility and enabling conditions spanning institutional capacity, teacher preparation, infrastructure, and equity. Using official curricula, policy documents, national statistics, and educational reports, we apply structured qualitative coding and a 1-5 ordinal scoring system to generate a cross country diagnosis. The findings reveal substantial regional asymmetries: among the six countries studied, Chile emerges as the most institutionally prepared for progressive quantum education integration, while the remaining countries exhibit varying combinations of curricular gaps and fragmented but promising enabling conditions. Building on this diagnosis, we propose a country sensitive, regionally coordinated roadmap for staged implementation, beginning with teacher development and pilot centers, leveraging open source platforms and local language resources, and scaling toward gradual curricular integration. This work establishes a baseline for future quantitative and mixed method studies evaluating learning outcomes, motivation, and scalable models for quantum education in Latin America.2025-12-18T07:12:36Z11 pages, 7 tablesAdriana Celeste Alvarado LeonOsmar Denilson Herrera CuevaRosario Mercedes Morales OrvezoDaniella Alexandra Crysti Vargas SaldanaFreddy Herrera Cuevahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16254v1An Open Workflow Model for Improving Educational Video Design: Tools, Data, and Insights2025-12-18T07:06:23ZEducational videos are widely used across various instructional models in higher education to support flexible and self-paced learning. However, student engagement with these videos varies significantly depending on how they are designed. While several studies have identified potential influencing factors, there remains a lack of scalable tools and open datasets to support large-scale, data-driven improvements in video design. This study aims to advance data-driven approaches to educational video design. Its core contributions include: (1) a workflow model for analysing educational videos; (2) an open-source implementation for extracting video metadata and features; (3) an accessible, community-driven database of video attributes; (4) a case study applying the approach to two engineering courses; and (5) an initial machine learning-based analysis to explore the relative influence of various video characteristics on student engagement. This work lays the groundwork for a shared, evidence-based approach to educational video design.2025-12-18T07:06:23ZMohamed TolbaOlivia KendallDaniel Tudball SmithAlexander GreggTony VoScott Wordleyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16094v1Share, Rotate, Split: The Effects of Group Work Role Distributions on Student Outcomes2025-12-18T02:23:40ZEducation literature recommends many different strategies for structuring student group work in labs. Many of these strategies, however, have not been sufficiently evaluated for their effects on student outcomes. One prior study suggested that sharing roles, rather than splitting roles, in lab groups can boost students' physics interest and self-efficacy. Here, we expand upon this literature by evaluating the effects of a broader range of role distributions across several student outcomes from a large sample at two different institutions. We developed a survey item to probe the ways students distribute their roles in lab groups. The item asks for the percent of time in lab they spent working together on lab roles (sharing), working alone on roles but rotating each session (rotating), and working alone in the same role throughout the semester (splitting). We employed hierarchical linear modeling to measure the effects of these role distributions on student critical thinking, self-efficacy, perceived agency, belonging, and sense of recognition based on survey items specific to physics lab contexts. We found that role distributions did not differentially impact student critical thinking. We also found that sharing roles tended to have a positive impact on student attitudes; splitting had a negative effect on attitudes; and rotating fell in between. Statistical significance varied across these attitudinal outcomes. Our findings invite further research and controlled studies to better understand the apparent benefits of sharing, rotating, and splitting roles in introductory physics labs.2025-12-18T02:23:40Z18 pages, 7 figures, submitted for reviewJacob FeinleibMatthew DewN. G. Holmeshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15917v1Macroscopic Brownian Motion on a Chaotic Fluid Interface2025-12-17T19:30:14ZBrownian motion is the erratic motion of an object due to collisions with the fluid in which it is immersed. In this work, we detail a tabletop laboratory demonstration of underdamped Brownian motion wherein a macroscopic particle resting on a driven fluid interface exhibits ballistic motion at short times and diffusive motion at long times. We observe the trajectory of a millimetric disk driven by a field of chaotic Faraday waves excited by a shaker. The crossover from ballistic to diffusive motion occurs at time and length scales experimentally accessible through particle tracking of a video recorded with a standard phone camera. Along with representative data, we provide a complete assembly guide, and operating procedure for students so that the experiment can be readily applied in the classroom. The tabletop setup can also be adapted for other student projects and active research topics relating to particle motion on a vibrating fluid interface.2025-12-17T19:30:14ZAssociated Github linked in references containing all supplementary filesJack-William BarottaCaroline M. BarottaEli SilverDaniel M. Harrishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16946v1Women in Theoretical Quantum Physics in Brazil:demographics, career profiles, recognition, and leadership2025-12-16T21:40:13ZGender imbalance in Physics remains a persistent global challenge, and Brazil is no exception. While women account for only 24% of Physics faculty in the country, their representation in Quantum Physics is even smaller. In this work, we provide the first comprehensive overview of women working in Theoretical Quantum Physics in Brazil, here referred to as the SheQ (She + Quantum) community. Using data from the CNPq Lattes platform, we identify 93 researchers and analyze their geographic distribution, academic trajectories, scientific productivity, international experience, recognition through awards and fellowships, and engagement with initiatives promoting gender equity. Our results reveal both progress and persistent disparities: SheQ researchers have a strong scientific output, leadership roles, and international training; yet, their recognition through productivity fellowships remains modest, and their involvement in gender-related initiatives, although increasing among younger generations, remains limited. By combining quantitative indicators with institutional perspectives, we highlight structural barriers as well as opportunities for fostering a more inclusive environment in Quantum Physics. his study thus contributes to a broader reflection on how diversity not only promotes fairness but also strengthens creativity, innovation, and scientific progress.2025-12-16T21:40:13ZThis paper has been accepted for publication in the Special Issue of the Brazilian Journal of Physics celebrating the Centenary of Quantum MechanicsTatiana PaulettiPaula Homem de MelloThereza PaivaVivian V. França10.1007/s13538-025-01992-7http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09973v2Which Rope Breaks? A Study of Tension Distribution in Multi-Rope Systems2025-12-16T07:19:51ZWe investigate the tension distribution in systems of mass-less ropes under different loading conditions. For a two-rope system, we demonstrate how the breaking scenario depends on the applied force dynamics: rapid pulling causes the lower rope to break, while gradual pulling leads to upper rope failure. Extending to a three-rope Y-shaped configuration, we identify a critical angle $θ_{C}=60^{\circ}$ that determines which rope breaks first. When the angle between the upper ropes exceeds this critical value, the upper ropes fail before the lower one. We further analyze how an attached mass at the junction point modifies this critical angle and establish maximum mass limits for valid solutions. Our results provide practical insights for introductory physics students understanding static forces and system stabilities.2025-09-12T05:19:54ZPhys. Educ. 61 015051 (2026)Amir Eskandari-aslRoberto De Luca10.1088/1361-6552/ae2f15