https://arxiv.org/api/76VnANOXi3oYOikHXHLc5vzm88k 2026-07-17T21:43:58Z 4633 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11375v2 2026-07-09T15:32:51Z

Creating learning environments that can accommodate teachers' diverse needs is challenging because responsive elements are not clearly defined or identified. This study identified responsive teacher professional development (PD) elements by taking a phenomenological approach. Using surveys and interviews with 13 high school physics teachers in a PD program at a Midwestern university, we identified responsive features such as practicality, flexibility, and accessibility core to the enactment of a responsive PD. Other features were opportunities for community engagement, pedagogical support, and professional growth, which were aligned with the benefits of engagement in a Community of Practice model incorporated in this work.

2023-10-17T16:17:42Z 12 pages including references, figures and tables Hamideh Talafian Morten Lundsgaard Maggie Mahmood Devyn Shafer Tim Stelzer Eric Kuo 10.1016/j.tate.2024.104812 http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06043v1 2026-07-07T09:20:57Z

Several programs for marginalized young people have been intentionally designed to increase the diversity in STEM careers; however, the participation of racially and ethnically minoritized individuals continued to be underrepresented in STEM disciplines. Using discipline-based STEM identity theories and drawing data from an NSF-funded survey of 1,134 participants, these regression analyses examine the impact of prior educational experiences on STEM identity (i.e., seeing oneself as a STEM person) and career aspirations among individuals attending Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs). The study's findings indicate that although positive reinforcement positively correlates with the STEM identity construct, the efforts are not always supportive enough to predict STEM career aspirations for minoritized individuals. It underscores the importance of explicitly designing appropriate interventions to support STEM identity formation and STEM career pursuit.

2026-07-07T09:20:57Z Amdad Ahmed Awsaf Remy Dou Gerhard Sonnert Philip Sadler http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06035v1 2026-07-07T09:11:42Z

Despite numerous initiatives aimed at enhancing diversity and achieving equity in the STEM workforce, racially and ethnically minoritized individuals remain underrepresented in STEM disciplines and the STEM workforce. While many factors influence STEM identity (i.e., seeing oneself as a STEM person), it strongly correlates with individuals' future STEM career choices. This phenomenological qualitative study explores the impact of formal or informal STEM-related recognition that influences minority youths' aspirations to pursue a STEM career. Results indicate that though misrecognition negatively impacts one's motivation to study STEM areas, lack of recognition in formal schooling contexts was sometimes mitigated by recognition and support from family. The study suggests providing targeted interventions to facilitate underrepresented youths' achievements in STEM to foster a strong STEM identity and STEM career aspirations.

2026-07-07T09:11:42Z Amdad Ahmed Awsaf Nicole Giansanti Susan Sunbury Remy Dou http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10785v3 2026-07-06T14:47:22Z

Generative AI offers new opportunities for individualized and adaptive learning, e.g., through large language model (LLM)-based feedback systems. While LLMs can produce factually correct feedback for relatively straightforward conceptual tasks, delivering high-quality feedback for tasks that require advanced domain expertise, such as physics problem solving, remains a substantial challenge. This study presents the design and implementation of an LLM-based feedback system for physics problem solving grounded in evidence-centered design and reports a first evaluation within the German Physics Olympiad. Participants rated the usefulness and correctness of the generated feedback for each implemented problem. The collected ratings indicate that the feedback was generally perceived as useful and highly correct. However, an in-depth analysis revealed that the feedback contained errors in 20% of cases; errors that often went unnoticed by the students. We discuss the risks associated with uncritical reliance on LLM-based feedback and outline potential directions for generating more adaptive and reliable LLM-based feedback in the future.

2025-12-11T16:29:38Z Holger Maus Fabian Kieser Stefan Petersen Peter Wulff Paul Tschisgale http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05140v1 2026-07-06T14:24:54Z

Two-stage exams have been used in physics classrooms, yet no empirical study has examined the effect of individual member performances on team performance. Using direct measures of individual and team performances in two-stage physics exams, we study the effect of member performances on team outcomes. Our data reveal three results of interest. First, either the best or the mean of member performances significantly affects team performance, whereas the standard deviation of member performances has a weak effect. Second, member performances explain less than half the variance in team performances, indicating that team outcomes in two-stage exams are not determined simply by individual performances. Third, cross-validation shows that the best predictor of team performance is the best member's performance, highlighting the need to form balanced teams with high-scoring individuals distributed evenly throughout teams before team exams are conducted. As the first empirical analysis built on the input-process-output framework, this study provides researchers of two-stage exams with insight into how to investigate factors that can make team problem-solving more productive in the team round.

2026-07-06T14:24:54Z Hyewon Jang http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03457v1 2026-07-03T16:14:40Z

Physical systems and objects in the object-oriented programming (OOP) paradigm share a common organizational structure: identity, state, and governing laws. We argue that making this structural correspondence explicit, rather than leaving it as tacit knowledge embedded in scientific software, provides a natural and general basis for teaching computational physics. The correspondence is independent of both programming language and mathematical formalism, applying equally to differential equations, eigenvalue problems, and variational principles. To illustrate this idea, we present Ollin, an open-source Python framework for computational physics education organized around the correspondence principle. Four examples spanning mechanics, celestial mechanics, quantum mechanics, and variational optics demonstrate that the same representational structure can be preserved across diverse physical domains. In each case, the class definition serves as the physical model, its attributes encode the state and physical parameters of the system, and its methods encode the governing laws, regardless of whether those laws are integrated, diagonalized, or optimized. More broadly, the correspondence principle provides a conceptual framework for relating the organization of physical models to the organization of code.

2026-07-03T16:14:40Z Luis E. Sánchez-González http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01361v2 2026-07-03T11:36:21Z

We present a low-cost laboratory for investigating the dynamics of a vertical mass-spring oscillator using real-time computer vision. The proposed system automatically tracks the motion of the oscillating mass with a smartphone camera, displays the displacement in real time, and exports the recorded data for further analysis. Representative experiments include damped oscillations, oscillation period measurements, spectral analysis, and phase-space reconstruction. The system also enables the investigation of nonlinear phenomena, including harmonic generation, frequency mixing, and energy exchange between coupled oscillation modes. Owing to its low cost, ease of construction, and automated data acquisition, the proposed apparatus extends the traditional mass-spring experiment to include topics in nonlinear dynamics that are rarely explored in undergraduate laboratories.

2026-07-01T18:23:09Z 6 pages, 6 figures Marco P. M. de Souza http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12757v2 2026-07-02T18:44:37Z

Generative AI is rapidly reshaping STEM higher education. Not only are our educational practices changing, but how we think about educational transformation must adapt. Existing models of institutional change in STEM, aimed at interactive engagement, have largely followed an adoption logic: relatively stable, well-researched educational practices are evaluated and then scaled. These assumptions do not hold for generative AI, which is an arrival technology -- entering classrooms before a sufficient pedagogical evidence base could form. Building on recent decades of work on STEM institutional change, we propose a framework identifying six dimensions along which prior change models must be reconsidered in light of AI: three concerning the tools at the center of reform (the tool's evidence base, rate of change, and scope), and three concerning the people involved in change (faculty, change agents, and students). For each dimension, we examine how AI-era assumptions differ from those underlying prior interactive engagement reforms and derive design implications, including: privileging humble and local inquiries; organizing reform around pedagogical approaches rather than specific tools; repositioning change agents as facilitators of collective inquiry; and engaging students as partners in reform. Collectively, the six dimensions and design implications constitute a new framework for adapting change models to support institutions under conditions of genuine uncertainty. Finally, we illustrate how the framework may be applied through a brief case-study of a faculty workshop series carried out in a university physics department to support instructors adapting to this modern AI era.

2026-05-12T21:11:13Z David Perl-Nussbaum Noah D. Finkelstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02625v1 2026-07-02T12:29:10Z

This paper presents a fun and relatable classroom experiment to measure the viscosity of cooking oil using household tools and ingredients like kitchen scales, mugs, and dried peas. The experiment requires no formal training in math or physics, and helps to build intuition about friction, Newton's laws of motion, and Archimedes' buoyancy law.

2026-07-02T12:29:10Z Endre Joachim Lerheim Mossige http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14752v2 2026-07-01T14:47:27Z

This paper presents a social network analysis of the professional support networks of 100 LGBTQ+ and/or women PhD physicists, comparing the networks based on the career sectors of academia, industry, and government/nonprofit. The methods for constructing and analyzing the ego networks, which are novel in many ways, are explained in greater detail in an earlier publication (Hatcher et. al., 2025). We describe the networks of the whole group and use statistical tests of independence to explore differences between sectors in terms of whole network metrics, network composition based on alter (network member) characteristics, and support. We find that alters associated with groups (like affinity groups and personal and professional interest groups) are more likely to provide identity-based and community building support, participants in Academia have fewer personal friends in their networks while those in Industry have more, participants in Government report less instrumental support, and those in Academia report less material support. These results and others lead to suggestions for employers in these sectors on how to better support these physicists, including continuing to promote participation in affinity and interest groups, providing more material support and/or personal time in the academic sector, and more instrumental support in the form of professional development or training in the government sector.

2025-06-17T17:44:09Z Chase Hatcher Adrienne Traxler Lily Donis Madison Swirtz Camila Manni Justin Gutzwa Charles Henderson Ramón Barthelemy http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14732v2 2026-06-30T16:52:37Z

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered for automated assessment and feedback, understanding when LLM marking is valid is essential. We evaluate LLM-as-a-judge marking across three physics assessment formats - structured questions, written essays, and scientific plots - comparing GPT-5.2, Grok 4.1, Claude Opus 4.5, DeepSeek-V3.2, Gemini Pro 3, and committee aggregations against human markers under blind, solution-provided, false-solution, and anchored conditions. We distinguish absolute accuracy from rank-order agreement, since a marking system can match the distribution of human marks while failing to order responses by quality. Across task types, performance is sharply task-dependent. For blind university exam questions ($n=771$) and secondary and university structured questions ($n=1151$), models show robust rank-order agreement with human markers (Spearman $ρ> 0.6$), with official solutions reducing error and strengthening agreement. False solutions degrade absolute accuracy, showing that models defer to provided references, but leave rank-ordering intact. Essay marking behaves fundamentally differently. Across $n=55$ scripts ($n=275$ essays), blind AI marking is harsher and more variable than human marking and adding a mark scheme does not improve rank-order agreement. Anchored exemplars shift the AI mean close to the human mean and compress variance below the human standard deviation, but rank-order agreement remains near-zero. For code-based plot elements ($n=1400$), models achieve high rank-order agreement ($ρ> 0.84$) with near-linear calibration. Across all task types, validity tracks the structure of the assessment task - the extent to which marks can be mapped to explicit, observable grading features - and the reliability of the human benchmark, rather than raw model capability.

2026-03-16T02:09:06Z 29 pages, 28 figures Will Yeadon Tom Hardy Paul Mackay Elise Agra http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31696v1 2026-06-30T14:08:06Z

We describe a series of rubidium spectroscopy experiments that can be done using the Teachspin Diode Laser Spectroscopy instrument, which is commercially available and is already being used in physics teaching labs at over 150 universities. Our goal here is to provide a detailed examination of the capabilities of this instrument, including numerous examples of measurements and data analysis, presented as a supplement to the Teachspin users manual. Our hope is that instructors using this product or similar diode-laser-based Rb spectroscopy systems will find the experiments described here useful for designing and implementing the curricula in their own physics teaching labs.

2026-06-30T14:08:06Z Kenneth G. Libbrecht http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30255v1 2026-06-29T13:05:03Z

Teaching quantum mechanics is challenging, not least because the theory often conflicts with our classical worldview. Quantum correlations in particular are notoriously counter-intuitive. Their non-classical behavior is typically revealed through Bell-type inequalities. Among these, Wigner's Inequality constitutes a particularly accessible test, as it relies on minimal set-theoretic assumptions. In this pedagogical paper, we derive Wigner's Inequality, describe a quantum-optical setup to experimentally violate it, and provide access to the raw data, enabling students and instructors to perform their own analyses. Our measured data shows clear violations of Wigner's Inequality, directly illustrating the non-classical nature of quantum correlations. By connecting theory, experiment, and data analysis, this paper equips educators with a resource for engaging students in authentic scientific practice and developing a deeper understanding of quantum systems.

2026-06-29T13:05:03Z 10 pages, 5 figures, 1 table Maximilian Rottensteiner Dorian Schiffer Tobias Pausch Alois Mair Anton Zeilinger http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23660v2 2026-06-28T13:30:08Z

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has introduced new possibilities and challenges in physics education, necessitating rigorous evaluation of their capabilities as both problem solvers and automated assessors. This paper presents the results of three complementary studies that evaluated frontier models released between mid-2024 and late-2025. Models were assessed on their ability to generate accurate, step-by-step solutions to university-level physics problems in Classical Mechanics, Electromagnetism, and Quantum Mechanics, and subsequently on their reliability in grading student solutions against a formal mark scheme. The results indicate a clear trajectory toward benchmark saturation in text-based reasoning, with recent architectures (such as ChatGPT-5.1 and Gemini 3.0 Pro) achieving near-perfect scores. Furthermore, recent advances in native multimodal integration have resolved previous limitations in spatial geometry and topological interpretation, enabling models to accurately process accompanying diagrams. As automated assessors, newer models demonstrated significant improvements in alignment with human grading, heavily mitigating the systemic over-marking observed in earlier iterations. However, while models reliably evaluate fully correct handwritten work, assigning partial credit to flawed or incomplete reasoning remains a persistent challenge. These findings suggest that as of late 2025, LLMs offer viable support for both independent student learning and instructional automation, provided their limitations in evaluating ambiguous reasoning are actively managed.

2026-05-22T14:11:34Z 22 pages Jonah L. Donaldson Aliya Nawaz Konstantinos Doran Alysta Lim Mario Campanelli http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28872v1 2026-06-27T11:31:00Z

Text embeddings are increasingly used in physics education research to organize, compare, and cluster large collections of written text. Their appeal is clear: once student responses have been mapped into a vector space, similarity comparisons and clustering become computationally inexpensive. However, in assessment contexts, the relevant question is not merely whether clusters can be produced, but whether the geometry of the embedding space preserves grading-relevant distinctions. We tested this premise using 992 handwritten student-problem solutions from a high-stakes engineering thermodynamics exam, transcribed into five textual representations and embedded using nine embedding mechanisms. We compared embedding similarity and embedding-based hierarchical clusters against human-assigned scores. Across models, representations, and clustering choices, embedding similarity showed a consistent but modest relationship to score similarity, and the resulting clusters were score-enriched but not score-equivalent. Experiments with a synthetic data set suggest that this may be due to embeddings behaving like novices when categorizing physics-problem solutions, that is, their similarity geometry is strongly influenced by surface features rather than conceptual, semantic structure. These findings suggest that state-of-the-art embeddings can support exploratory organization and human-in-the-loop review of physics solutions, but they do not provide an unsupervised basis for grading without external validation against the assessment construct of interest.

2026-06-27T11:31:00Z Maike Tauschhuber Gerd Kortemeyer