https://arxiv.org/api/76VnANOXi3oYOikHXHLc5vzm88k 2026-03-26T08:18:20Z 4508 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12154v1 2026-03-12T16:52:22Z

Generative Artificial Intelligence (gen-AI) is rapidly becoming more integrated into today's classrooms in all ranges of education. In higher education, Gen-AI is often seen as a resource for students, aiding them in drafting outlines, solving simple mathematical problems, or even decoding or constructing code. In this paper, we analyze essay-based interviews (N=6) from an upper-division computational physics course, in which physics majors addressed their views and attitudes towards Gen-AI and how it affects their learning. We analyzed the concepts of creativity and gen-AI using the Four C Model, a framework encompassing four types of creativity. Our analysis of the data involved coding and characterizing students' definitions of creativity and generative AI. Our findings revealed two main observations: first, students conceptualized their creativity primarily within mini-c and little-c; second, students perceived gen-AI as a resource and learning tool but expressed skepticism regarding its accuracy and creativity.

2026-03-12T16:52:22Z 2024 PERC Proceedings [Boston, MA, July 10-11, 2024], edited by Q. X. Ryan, A. Pawl, and J. P. Zwolak Pachi Her Patti Hamerski 10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Her http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10959v1 2026-03-11T16:47:32Z

According to the literature, mobile devices as experimental tools (MDET) can offer educational benefits by creating authentic, real-life contexts for physics learning, enhancing student motivation through the use of familiar technology, and supporting cognitive processes by providing multiple representations of phenomena. However, concerns have been raised about potential distractions and cognitive overload. Regarding these conflicting perspectives, few empirical studies on the impact of MDET in real classroom settings of regular, full-length physics courses are available, focusing on a non-specialized high-school target group. We present a study of a mechanics course in such a new setting, addressing the tight curricular, material, and practical constraints inherent to it. A quasi experimental pre post design comparing a treatment group using MDET and a control group without (same content, lesson plan, and teachers) was used. The 19-week teaching sequence focused on conceptual learning and motivational outcomes, controlled by several predictor variables. Findings reveal substantial pre post learning gains for both groups (Cohen d = 0.9) and small gains for perceived relation to reality (d = 0.29). But no significant differences between treatments were found, indicating that MDET do not outperform conventional teaching under the given constraints. Moreover, no evidence of negative effects such as distraction or cognitive overload was observed, and little to no interactions with predictors such as gender or prior knowledge were found. In conclusion, MDET show considerable potential as an effective option for integrating technology into teaching, offering learning outcomes comparable to those of successful conventional teaching, but not better.

2026-03-11T16:47:32Z 32 pages, 5 figures, 10 tables Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010129 (2026) Alice Gasparini Florian Stern Marine Delaval Andreas Müller 10.1103/96gp-gqvj http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08394v1 2026-03-09T13:52:32Z

The finite square potential well is a staple problem in introductory quantum mechanics. There is an extensive literature on the determination of the allowed energies, which requires the solution of a transcendental equation by numerical, graphical or approximate analytic methods. Here we investigate the less explored problem of a particle in a semi-infinite potential well. The energy eigenvalues, which are also determined by a transcendental equation, are found by a standard graphical method, and a simple rule that yields the number of stationary states is provided. Next a simplification of the aforementioned transcendental equation is attempted. During the process pitfalls are encountered and a purportedly simpler graphical treatment of the problem given in the solutions manual to a fine textbook is shown to be flawed. A more careful analysis brings forth the correct simplification, which is shown to be particularly suitable for finding highly accurate approximations to the energy levels. Finally, a class of exact solutions is produced, the associated normalized eigenfunctions are constructed and the probability of finding the particle inside the well is computed.

2026-03-09T13:52:32Z 14 pages, 6 figures, to appear in Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física Nivaldo A. Lemos http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06342v2 2026-03-09T09:13:46Z

Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) is becoming increasingly prevalent and capable in physics, particularly for programming-related tasks. How, then, does genAI affect students' computational modeling? We interviewed 19 undergraduate students who had recently completed an open-ended computational assignment that encouraged the use of genAI, asking them how they used it. We then conducted a thematic analysis of these interviews using a framework for computational modeling in physics. We found that genAI significantly impacts several aspects of students' computational modeling, such as the planning, implementing, and debugging of computational models. GenAI can also help students find resources and introduce them to new computational tools. Productive use of genAI was associated with students limiting its use to small steps in the modeling process and consistently double-checking the formulas, explanations, and code it provided. We also identified challenges students faced due to an over-reliance on genAI, such as working from false model assumptions and not spending time learning the fundamentals of computational modeling, especially debugging. Finally, we discuss implications for teaching, such as the need to teach students how to use genAI productively and to urge them to plan before they code. We also highlight the continued value of low-stakes assessment and teaching assistants for teaching computational modeling, as the task remains difficult even with the introduction of genAI.

2026-03-06T14:48:04Z Karl Henrik Fredly Tor Ole B. Odden Benjamin M. Zwickl http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07457v1 2026-03-08T04:16:06Z

The rapid advancement of LLMs has generated growing interest in their potential role in physics education and assessment, yet a focused evaluation of their performance on multi-faceted, free-response physics problems remains underexplored. In this study, we systematically evaluate the performance of four widely accessible AI systems-ChatGPT 4.1 mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Claude 4.0 Sonnet, and DeepSeek R1-on AP Physics 1 and 2 free-response questions administered between 2015 and 2025. Model-generated solutions were produced under standardized exam-style prompting and evaluated by three independent physics experts using official College Board scoring guidelines. All models achieved relatively high mean scores (82-92%), indicating strong capability in structured algebraic problem solving. However, substantial year-to-year variability was observed, particularly for AP Physics 1, where statistical testing revealed no consistent performance hierarchy among models. In contrast, AP Physics 2 results showed statistically significant differences, with Gemini and DeepSeek demonstrating more consistent performance than Claude. A qualitative analysis revealed recurring error patterns across all models, including misinterpretation of diagrams and graphs, incorrect graph construction, incorrect reasoning about vector direction, circuit topology errors, partial and misleading qualitative explanations, and difficulties applying three-dimensional concepts such as the right-hand rule. These findings suggest that while contemporary AI systems can effectively support routine physics problem solving, they remain limited in tasks requiring spatial reasoning, visual interpretation, and conceptual integration. The results highlight both the instructional potential and current pedagogical limitations of AI-assisted learning tools in physics education.

2026-03-08T04:16:06Z 10 pages, 3 figures Bilas Paul Jashandeep Kaur Shantanu Chakraborty Shruti Shrestha http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13336v1 2026-03-06T20:21:09Z

Courses in electromagnetism and related technical subjects are often dominated by lecture-heavy instruction and complex mathematical concepts, which can make it difficult for students to stay engaged. This is particularly problematic in today's hyper-digitalized society, where constant screen exposure and shortened attention spans challenge traditional learning methods. While computer-based tools and hands-on laboratories offer some pedagogical improvements, they often fall short in terms of interactivity, dynamism, adaptiveness, and student engagement. In an effort to enrich the learning experience and boost student motivation, we have created a gamified learning activity for the undergraduate course "Radiocommunications"-commonly referred to as Antennas and Propagation in other institutions-, implemented in the form of a question-based board game. The activity, carried out over three academic years, is fully aligned with the course syllabus and encourages active learning, healthy competition, and collaborative problem-solving. Custom-made materials-including a game board, 270 question cards, wildcards, and incentive-based rewards-were developed specifically for this purpose. Qualitative results from a student survey, together with statistical evidence from hypothesis testing, suggest that the activity enhances conceptual understanding, helps students connect ideas across related subjects, and contributes to a more motivating and enjoyable learning experience.

2026-03-06T20:21:09Z Ana S. Domenech Antonio Alex-Amor http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06490v1 2026-03-06T17:17:33Z

Here, we present a simple, low-cost format for structured speaking and listening on historical, cultural, and equity-related topics within a physics institute. In this article, we describe how we run hour-long Learning Together sessions, including what you need, how to set expectations (this is not a debate, nor is it open discussion), and practical facilitation moves that help participants reflect safely on unfamiliar and sometimes difficult material. We aim to offer a replicable recipe that instructors and departments can adapt to their own contexts.

2026-03-06T17:17:33Z 10 pages James Day Katherine R. Herperger Kyle Monkman http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04679v3 2026-03-05T22:04:59Z

The lack of diversity in physics remains a persistent worldwide problem. Despite being a quantitative discipline which relies on measurements to construct and validate hypotheses, there remains a paucity of data on both demographics and experiences of marginalized groups. In Canada, there has never been a nationwide assessment of those studying or working in physics. Here, we present findings from Canadian Physics Counts: the first national survey of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in the Canadian physics community. Our intersectional approach allowed us to gather a wealth of information on gender identity, sexual orientation, race, disability, and more. Analyses revealed key findings, including the first data on physicists who identify as non-binary or gender diverse, as well as the first data on Black and Indigenous scholars. Black physicists (1.2%) and Indigenous physicists (.3%) were found to be the most underrepresented, while White men were overrepresented across all sectors. Among respondents with a disability, 5% reported receiving full accommodations for their required needs at their place of work or study. One in four respondents from BIPOC gender diverse backgrounds identified as being disabled, and the proportion of sexually diverse students who reported having a disability was more than three times higher than the proportion of heterosexual students with a disability. The data also revealed that students represented more demographic diversity than working professionals, highlighting the importance of acting today in order to retain the diverse physicists of tomorrow. Our analysis identifies areas for intervention and offers recommendations for building a diverse and inclusive physics community in Canada that can be a global exemplar.

2024-03-07T17:24:32Z 16 pages, 8 figures Eden J. Hennessey Anastasia Smolina Skye Hennessey Adrianna Tassone Alex Jay Shohini Ghose Kevin Hewitt http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04721v1 2026-03-05T01:48:51Z

Smartphones equipped with sensors such as accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers offer valuable opportunities for physics education, allowing students to measure motion using their own devices. However, commonly used applications provide acceleration only in the device-fixed coordinate system, which makes it difficult to analyze two- or three-dimensional motion when the device rotates. To address this limitation, we developed a web-based accelerometer application that can provide acceleration in a stationary global coordinate system. This is achieved by simultaneously recording acceleration in the device-fixed coordinate system and Euler angles, and converting them to rotation-compensated acceleration in real time. We also built a companion web application for numerical integration, noise reduction, and visualization of the measured data. Both applications are installation-free and can be accessed directly through a smartphone browser. We demonstrate the capabilities of the newly developed system through several representative types of motion, including sliding motion, projectile motion, and circular motion, by showing that rotation-compensated acceleration enables accurate reconstruction of velocity, displacement, and trajectories even when the smartphone changes its orientation. The applications were implemented in undergraduate mechanics classes, where students used them in group-based experiments. Classroom observations suggested that the use of these tools facilitated a deeper understanding of the relationships among acceleration, velocity, and position. These results suggest that rotation-compensated smartphone measurements provide a practical and effective tool for physics education.

2026-03-05T01:48:51Z 11 pages, 13 figures, 1 table Keita Nishioka Yasuhiro Tanaka http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04657v1 2026-03-04T22:44:50Z

Discussions of AI in education focus predominantly on student-facing tools -- chatbots, tutors, and problem generators -- while the potential for the same infrastructure to support instructors remains largely unexplored. We describe Stan, a suite of tools for an undergraduate chemical engineering thermodynamics course built on a data pipeline that we develop and deploy in dual roles: serving students and supporting instructors from a shared foundation of lecture transcripts and a structured textbook index. On the student side, a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline answers natural-language queries by extracting technical terms, matching them against the textbook index, and synthesizing grounded responses with specific chapter and page references. On the instructor side, the same transcript corpus is processed through structured analysis pipelines that produce per-lecture summaries, identify student questions and moments of confusion, and catalog the anecdotes and analogies used to motivate difficult material -- providing a searchable, semester-scale record of teaching that supports course reflection, reminders, and improvement. All components, including speech-to-text transcription, structured content extraction, and interactive query answering, run entirely on locally controlled hardware using open-weight models (Whisper large-v3, Llama~3.1 8B) with no dependence on cloud APIs, ensuring predictable costs, full data privacy, and reproducibility independent of third-party services. We describe the design, implementation, and practical failure modes encountered when deploying 7--8 billion parameter models for structured extraction over long lecture transcripts, including context truncation, bimodal output distributions, and schema drift, along with the mitigations that resolved them.

2026-03-04T22:44:50Z 17 pages, 6 figures. For associated code repository, see https://github.com/EntropicLearners/stan.git Eric M. Furst Vasudevan Venkateshwaran http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04616v1 2026-03-04T21:20:55Z

This study applies Computational Grounded Theory (CGT) to analyze student misconceptions using interaction data from an AI-powered chatbot deployed in a university-level Modern Physics course. The chatbot - the UTA Study Buddy Bot - engaged students in peer-like problem-solving conversations throughout the semester, generating a rich dataset of over 10 million tokens. To explore patterns in student reasoning and identify recurring conceptual difficulties, we implemented a CGT pipeline that combined natural language processing, unsupervised clustering of sentence-level vector embeddings, human interpretation of emergent themes, and supervised learning to evaluate the generalizability of identified categories. Preliminary results revealed persistent misconceptions in areas such as relativistic momentum and quantum energy levels, along with distinctive trends in how students phrased their questions and expressed uncertainty. These findings underscore the potential of CGT as a scalable, theory-aligned approach for extracting insights from chatbot dialogues and guiding the development of more adaptive, AI-driven educational tools in physics instruction.

2026-03-04T21:20:55Z Atharva Dange Ramon E. Lopez http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10268v2 2026-03-04T20:33:00Z

Canada is internationally recognized for its leadership in science and its commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields. Despite this leadership, limited research has examined gender disparities in scientific publishing within the Canadian context. This study analyzes over 67,000 articles published in 24 Canadian Science Publishing (CSP) journals between 2010 and 2021 to better understand patterns of gender representation. Findings show that women accounted for less than one-third of published authors across CSP journals. Representation varied by discipline, with higher proportions of women in biomedical sciences and lower proportions of women in engineering - trends that mirror broader national and global patterns. Notably, the proportion of women submitting manuscripts closely matched those published, suggesting that broader workforce disparities may play a larger role than publication bias. Women were less likely to be solo authors or to hold prominent authorship positions, such as first or last author - roles typically associated with research leadership and career advancement. These findings point to the need for a two-fold response: continued efforts to address systemic barriers to women's participation in science, and a review of publishing practices to ensure equitable access, recognition, and inclusion for all researchers.

2025-12-11T04:14:12Z Supplementary Information included Eden J. Hennessey Amanda Desnoyers Margaret Christ Adrianna Tassone Skye Hennessey Bianca Dreyer Alex Jay Patricia Sanchez Shohini Ghose http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09781v2 2026-03-03T15:19:58Z

We present three versions of a pendulum lab activity to explore how theoretical commitments, motivations, and aspirations reflect in curriculum design. In earlier work, Boudreaux & Elby (2020) discussed how different theoretical perspectives led them to different designs of tutorials. Here, we discuss our finding that even starting from the same theoretical perspective and having similar goals for students can lead to differences of design. We give three interacting reasons why our labs diverge: We have different expectations of students at our respective institutions; we have different ancillary goals; and we draw different implications from our shared theoretical commitments. Our account demonstrates the complexity of the relationship between theory, goals, and curriculum design. In this way, it adds to prior arguments for the importance of designers' articulating the reasoning for their choices as well as for the possible value of instructors' responsive adaptations to curricula.

2025-12-10T16:00:24Z Ian Descamps Roger Tobin Paul Wagoner David Hammer N. G. Holmes Rachel E. Scherr http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01946v3 2026-03-02T09:42:06Z

It is demonstrated that energy conservation allows for a straight derivation of Newtonian mechanics without an apriori definition of the concept of work. Furthermore it is shown that energy must be depicted as a function of position and momentum in order to obtain the correct relativistic equations. Accordingly it is argued that not only quantum theory but also special relativity is intrinsically a Hamiltonian theory which requires a description of the dynamics using coordinate and momentum instead of velocity. Furthermore it is argued that the usual historical order of the ``formulations'' of mechanics, from Newtonian via Lagrangian to Hamiltonian mechanics, is illogical and misleading. We suggest that it should be reversed.

2024-09-03T14:43:42Z C. Baumgarten http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00329v1 2026-02-27T21:56:43Z

Physics instructors need support to successfully adopt and adapt evidence-based active engagement (EBAE) approaches because improving teaching and learning is a process and support is needed to ensure that they do not get disheartened if a particular EBAE approach does not produce the desired outcome. The instructors not only need support to refine their implementation of a specific EBAE approach to make them effective, but also to use a variety of EBAE methods to improve student learning. Here we illustrate how, with appropriate support, a quantum mechanics instructor did not give up when an EBAE approach involving implementation of a sequence of clicker questions on addition of angular momentum did not yield expected learning outcomes. The support ensured that the instructor remained optimistic and used another EBAE method that did not require him to spend more time in class on this topic. In particular, the instructor created an opportunity for students to productively struggle with the same problems (they had not performed well on after clicker questions) by giving them grade incentives to correct their mistakes outside of class. Student performance on one of the addition of angular momentum problems posed on the final exam suggests that students who corrected their mistakes benefited from the task and learned about addition of angular momentum better than those who did not correct their mistakes. Encouraging and supporting physics instructors can even be accomplished using an online community of physics educators. This type of support can go a long way in helping students learn physics because it is likely to increase their persistence in using various EBAE approaches as they refine their implementation to suit their students as well as their own instructional style.

2026-02-27T21:56:43Z Paul Justice Emily Marshman Chandralekha Singh