https://arxiv.org/api/fGr3xZCvhG7nZN32HjcmtAPiEf4 2026-06-10T10:44:02Z 4597 135 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09781v2 2026-03-03T15:19:58Z

We present three versions of a pendulum lab activity to explore how theoretical commitments, motivations, and aspirations reflect in curriculum design. In earlier work, Boudreaux & Elby (2020) discussed how different theoretical perspectives led them to different designs of tutorials. Here, we discuss our finding that even starting from the same theoretical perspective and having similar goals for students can lead to differences of design. We give three interacting reasons why our labs diverge: We have different expectations of students at our respective institutions; we have different ancillary goals; and we draw different implications from our shared theoretical commitments. Our account demonstrates the complexity of the relationship between theory, goals, and curriculum design. In this way, it adds to prior arguments for the importance of designers' articulating the reasoning for their choices as well as for the possible value of instructors' responsive adaptations to curricula.

2025-12-10T16:00:24Z Ian Descamps Roger Tobin Paul Wagoner David Hammer N. G. Holmes Rachel E. Scherr 10.1103/6g9j-s2cm http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01946v3 2026-03-02T09:42:06Z

It is demonstrated that energy conservation allows for a straight derivation of Newtonian mechanics without an apriori definition of the concept of work. Furthermore it is shown that energy must be depicted as a function of position and momentum in order to obtain the correct relativistic equations. Accordingly it is argued that not only quantum theory but also special relativity is intrinsically a Hamiltonian theory which requires a description of the dynamics using coordinate and momentum instead of velocity. Furthermore it is argued that the usual historical order of the ``formulations'' of mechanics, from Newtonian via Lagrangian to Hamiltonian mechanics, is illogical and misleading. We suggest that it should be reversed.

2024-09-03T14:43:42Z C. Baumgarten http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00329v1 2026-02-27T21:56:43Z

Physics instructors need support to successfully adopt and adapt evidence-based active engagement (EBAE) approaches because improving teaching and learning is a process and support is needed to ensure that they do not get disheartened if a particular EBAE approach does not produce the desired outcome. The instructors not only need support to refine their implementation of a specific EBAE approach to make them effective, but also to use a variety of EBAE methods to improve student learning. Here we illustrate how, with appropriate support, a quantum mechanics instructor did not give up when an EBAE approach involving implementation of a sequence of clicker questions on addition of angular momentum did not yield expected learning outcomes. The support ensured that the instructor remained optimistic and used another EBAE method that did not require him to spend more time in class on this topic. In particular, the instructor created an opportunity for students to productively struggle with the same problems (they had not performed well on after clicker questions) by giving them grade incentives to correct their mistakes outside of class. Student performance on one of the addition of angular momentum problems posed on the final exam suggests that students who corrected their mistakes benefited from the task and learned about addition of angular momentum better than those who did not correct their mistakes. Encouraging and supporting physics instructors can even be accomplished using an online community of physics educators. This type of support can go a long way in helping students learn physics because it is likely to increase their persistence in using various EBAE approaches as they refine their implementation to suit their students as well as their own instructional style.

2026-02-27T21:56:43Z Paul Justice Emily Marshman Chandralekha Singh http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12029v3 2026-02-27T13:50:38Z

The Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation governs the propagation of nonlinear internal and surface gravity waves in shallow ocean environments, where the balance between nonlinear steepening and frequency-dependent dispersion produces solitons. This article presents sangkuriang, an open-source Python library that solves the KdV equation using Fourier pseudo-spectral spatial discretization and adaptive eighth-order Runge-Kutta time integration, accelerated via just-in-time (JIT) compilation. Validation across four progressively complex scenarios-isolated soliton propagation, symmetric interactions, overtaking collisions, and three-body interactions-demonstrates high-fidelity conservation of mass, momentum, and energy, with relative errors below $O(10^{-4})$. Measured soliton velocities agree with theoretical predictions within $5\%$, and complementary diagnostics based on spectral entropy and recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) confirm that computed solutions preserve the regular phase-space structure characteristic of integrable Hamiltonian systems. Running on a standard laptop, sangkuriang provides a robust, lightweight platform for reproducible numerical investigation of idealized nonlinear dispersive wave dynamics relevant to coastal and ocean engineering applications.

2026-01-17T12:12:52Z 25 pages, 6 figures Dasapta E. Irawan Sandy H. S. Herho Faruq Khadami Iwan P. Anwar Karina A. Sujatmiko Alfita P. Handayani Faiz R. Fajary Rusmawan Suwarman http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23955v1 2026-02-27T11:57:59Z

Particle Dobble is an open-access, gamified learning tool designed to address persistent misconceptions in particle physics education by symbolically representing elements of the Standard Model. Aimed at upper secondary and introductory undergraduate students, the card game adapts the combinatorial structure of Dobble to create a deck in which each pair of cards shares exactly one particle symbol, fostering repeated retrieval practice and conceptual discussion. By deliberately replacing literal depictions of particles with abstract icons, the game challenges Newtonian "tiny billiard ball" mental models and promotes a relational, non-classical understanding of elementary particles. Grounded in research on student difficulties in quantum mechanics and gamification in science education, Particle Dobble serves as a low-threshold intervention to prepare learners for more formal engagement with quantum field concepts.

2026-02-27T11:57:59Z 6 pages, 2 figures. This is the accepted manuscript of an article accepted for publication in The Physics Teacher. \c{opyright} 2026 American Association of Physics Teachers Lukas Mientus Anna Ruechel Karsten Kalke Andreas Borowski http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03352v1 2026-02-26T18:53:05Z

The International Physics Olympiad (IPhO) is the world's most prestigious and renowned physics competition for pre-university students. IPhO problems require complex reasoning based on deep understanding of physical principles in a standard general physics curriculum. On IPhO 2025 theory problems, while gold medal performance by AI models was reported previously, it falls behind the best human contestant. Here we build a simple agent with Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. We run it five times and it achieved a perfect score every time. However, data contamination could occur because Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview was released after the competition.

2026-02-26T18:53:05Z Yichen Huang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03348v1 2026-02-26T02:12:51Z

The rapid development of artificial intelligence technology is driving the transformation of physics education from traditional models to intelligent and data-driven approaches. To explore the evolution and cutting-edge hotspots in this field, this study conducted a systematic bibliometric analysis of 138 core literature published between 2021 and 2025 using VOSViewer and CiteSpace, based on the Web of Science Core Collection database. Research shows that the number of related publications will increase exponentially from 2023, with the United States, China, and Germany being the main research forces. The research focus has rapidly evolved from early machine learning assisted data analysis to the application of generative AI in teaching, the integration of physics information neural networks in computational physics courses, and the exploration of intelligent medical physics education. At present, this field is in the early stages of explosive growth and exhibits significant interdisciplinary characteristics. Future research should focus on building an adaptive learning ecosystem, reconstructing evaluation systems, and cultivating students' AI ethics and physical intuition.

2026-02-26T02:12:51Z 15 pages, 6 figures Chengtian Liang Yike Qian Yixuan Lin Yu Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21776v1 2026-02-25T10:51:50Z

This study discusses the opportunity to integrate tinkering, a constructionist practice, into formal education, highlighting its potential and challenges. We propose a model through which teachers can blend the open exploratory nature of tinkering with structured learning in primary school classrooms, focusing on Physics Education. Despite pandemic-induced limitations, feedback from 20 teachers and analysis of fishbowl protocols revealed the positive impact of tinkering on classroom dynamics, teacher engagement, and student access to knowledge. Our findings indicated that tinkering can surface relevant scientific questions. Nevertheless, teachers feel unprepared to tackle them in the classroom. This evidence will guide our future co-designs to enhance learning experiences and address the complexities of incorporating tinkering into formal education.

2026-02-25T10:51:50Z 21 pages,4 figures Berti, F. & Seitz, S. (Eds.). (2025). The Primary School as a Playful Space. bu,press S. Rini S. Ricciardi 10.13124/9788860462053 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19659v1 2026-02-23T10:09:05Z

We study whether latent motivation signals in short Spanish admission responses predict engagement and performance in an early quantum computing pathway run by QuantumHub Peru. We analyze N=241 applicants' open responses and link them to outcomes from two selective modules: Module 1 (secondary; mathematics and computing foundations; n=23) and Module 2 (secondary + early undergraduate; quantum fundamentals; n=36, including M1 continuers). To ensure baseline comparability, the M2 university entrance exam matched the difficulty of the M1 final. Final grades followed the program's official cohort-specific weightings (attendance/assignments/exam), which we retain to preserve ecological validity. Methodologically, we model text with Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA, k=8) and, for robustness, with sentence embeddings from a small multilingual language model, EmbeddingGemma-300M, projected via UMAP and clustered with HDBSCAN. This combination leverages the transparency of bag-of-words topics and the semantic richness of small language model embeddings. Descriptively, curiosity/learning topics show higher grades and attendance than technology/career-oriented topics; inferential tests are underpowered (e.g., linear R2 ~ 0.03; logistic pseudo-R2 ~ 0.04) so effect-size estimates should be viewed as preliminary rather than confirmatory. Embedding-based clustering yields seven clusters with 11.2% noise and modest agreement with LDA (ARI=0.068; NMI=0.163). Results suggest that brief motivation responses encode promising signals that could support early mentoring in rigorous STEM pipelines, while highlighting the need for larger, pre-registered studies.

2026-02-23T10:09:05Z Published in the Proceedings of IEEE ICALTER 2025. 5 pages, 7 figures Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALTER), 2025 Daniella Alexandra Crysti Vargas Saldana Freddy Herrera Cueva 10.1109/ICALTER69698.2025.11355072 http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10515v2 2026-02-18T13:57:46Z

Olympiad-level physics problem-solving significantly challenges both humans and artificial intelligence (AI), as it requires integrating appropriate modeling, application of physical principles, and precise calculation within long reasoning processes. In this paper, we introduce LOCA (LOgical Chain Augmentation), an AI agent framework designed for complex physics reasoning. LOCA decomposes long reasoning into serialized atomic and verifiable steps, refining the solution through an augment-review loop. We evaluate LOCA on the 2025 Chinese Physics Olympiad (CPhO) theory examination, a rigorous testbed renowned for its depth and complexity. The framework achieves a near-perfect score of 313 out of 320 points, significantly surpassing the top human competitor and other baseline methods. Furthermore, LOCA attains a near-perfect score of 28.6 out of 30 on the IPhO 2025 examination, demonstrating its strong generalizability across different contexts. Our work points toward the development of trustworthy AI partners in both research and education.

2025-11-13T17:20:46Z 8 pages, 3 figures, Content from the previous article 2510.01249 is included Dong-Shan Jian Xiang Li Chen-Xu Yan Hui-Wen Zheng Zhi-Zhang Bian You-Le Fang Ren-Xi He Jing-Tian Zhang Ce Meng Ling-Shi Meng Bing-Rui Gong Sheng-Qi Zhang Yan-Qing Ma http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15468v1 2026-02-17T10:15:02Z

In this paper, we use the APOS theoretical framework to validate a hypothetical learning trajectory of the 2D heat equation, a preliminary genetic decomposition that stresses the conceptual understanding of its mathematical formulation. We design questions to probe specific mental constructions of the preliminary genetic decomposition. We interview 8 students in the second year of the B.Sc. enrolled in either engineering, physics or twin (mathematics and physics) majors. Our findings indicate that students engage with many predicted mental constructions. In particular, coordination and encapsulation of two process conceptions of the Laplacian of the temperature improve understanding although it is challenging. Other parts of the genetic decomposition require refinements. These include mental constructions related to the temperature distribution function, heat flow, and the temperature gradient.

2026-02-17T10:15:02Z Maria Al Dehaybes Johan Deprez Paul van Kampen Mieke De Cock http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15230v1 2026-02-16T22:22:16Z

The rapid advancement of quantum information science and technology (QIST) has generated significant attention from people in academia, industry, and the public. Recent advances in QIST have led to both opportunities and challenges for students and researchers who are curious about the potential of the field amid hype, considering whether their skills are aligned with what the field needs, and contemplating how collaborating with industries may impact their research. This qualitative study presents perspectives from leading quantum researchers who are educators on three critical aspects shaping QIST's development: (1) the impact of hype in the field and strategies for managing expectations, (2) approaches to creating conducive environments that attract students and established researchers from non-physics disciplines, and (3) effective models for fostering university-industry partnerships that can be valuable for students and researchers alike. These aspects, along with several interconnected challenges, were explored through in-depth interviews with quantum educators. Our findings reveal nuanced perspectives on managing the hype cycle and its risks in creating unrealistic expectations. Regarding greater interdisciplinary engagement and attracting more non-physicists to QIST, educators emphasized the need to recognize and leverage existing expertise from other fields while developing educational pathways that meet diverse student backgrounds to prepare them for the QIST workforce. On university-industry partnerships, respondents highlighted successful models, while noting persistent challenges around intellectual property, confidentiality, and differing organizational goals. These insights provide valuable guidance for educators, policymakers, and industry leaders working to build a sustainable quantum workforce while maintaining realistic expectations about the field's trajectory.

2026-02-16T22:22:16Z Liam Doyle Fargol Seifollahi Chandralekha Singh 10.1088/1361-6404/ae3ae6 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15217v1 2026-02-16T21:49:25Z

The rapid growth of quantum information science and technology (QIST) in the 21st century has created both excitement and uncertainty about the field's trajectory. This qualitative study presents perspectives from leading quantum researchers, who are educators, on fundamental questions frequently posed by students, the public, and the media regarding QIST. Through in-depth interviews, we explored several issues related to QIST including the following key areas: the current state of quantum computing in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era and timelines for fault-tolerant quantum computers, the feasibility of personal quantum computers in our pockets, and promising qubit architectures for future development. Our findings reveal diverse yet convergent perspectives on these issues. While experts agree that the current machines with physical qubits that are being built currently should be called quantum computers, most estimated that it will take a decade to build a small fault-tolerant quantum computer, and several decades to achieve scalable systems capable of running Shor's factoring algorithm with quantum advantage. Regarding carrying a quantum computer in the pocket, experts viewed quantum computers as specialized tools that will remain in central locations such as data centers and can be accessed remotely for applications for which they are particularly effective compared to classical computers. Quantum researchers suggested that multiple platforms show promise, with no clear winner emerging. These insights provide valuable guidance for educators, policymakers, and the broader community in establishing realistic expectations for developments in this exciting field. Our findings can provide valuable information for educators to clarify student doubts about these important yet confusing issues related to quantum technologies.

2026-02-16T21:49:25Z Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010101 (2026) Liam Doyle Fargol Seifollahi Chandralekha Singh 10.1103/md6x-pfrr http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10301v2 2026-02-15T16:55:50Z

A brief excursion into the three-body problem in quantum mechanics is presented for graduate students or researchers in nuclear physics. Starting from single-particle coordinates, the three-body Schrödinger equation is systematically transformed into a representation in Jacobi coordinates. Gradient, Laplacian, and kinetic energy operators are explicitly derived using the multivariable chain rule. Faddeev equations are reformulated in hyperspherical coordinates. In all transformations (from single-particle coordinates to Jacobi coordinates, rotation between Jacobi coordinates and from Jacobi coordinates to hyperspherical coordinates) the determinant of the Jacobian matrix is computed to ensure correct transformation of volume elements. The Faddeev equations in hyperspherical coordinates are projected onto a hyperspherical harmonics basis, leading to the coupled hyperradial equations that define the hyperspherical harmonics method.

2025-04-14T15:10:00Z Emile Meoto http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11053v2 2026-02-12T20:23:53Z

We investigated the impact of incorporating quantitative reasoning for deeper sense-making in a Quantum Interactive Learning Tutorial (QuILT) on students' conceptual performance using a framework emphasizing integration of conceptual and quantitative aspects of quantum optics. In this investigation, we compared two versions of the QuILT that were developed and validated to help students learn various aspects of quantum optics using a Mach Zehnder Interferometer with single photons and polarizers. One version of the QuILT is entirely conceptual while the other version integrates quantitative and conceptual reasoning (hybrid version). Performance on conceptual questions of upper-level undergraduate and graduate students who engaged with the hybrid QuILT was compared with that of those who utilized the conceptual QuILT emphasizing the same concepts. Both versions of the QuILT focus on the same concepts, use a scaffolded approach to learning, and take advantage of research on students' difficulties in learning. The hybrid and conceptual QuILTs were used in courses for upper-level undergraduates or first-year physics graduate students in several consecutive years at the same university. The same conceptual pre-test and post-test were administered after traditional lecture-based instruction in relevant concepts and after student engaged with the QuILT, respectively. We find that the post-test performance of physics graduate students who utilized the hybrid QuILT on conceptual questions, was better than those who utilized the conceptual QuILT. For undergraduates, the results showed differences for different classes. One possible interpretation of these findings consistent with our framework is that integrating conceptual and quantitative aspects of physics in research-based tools and pedagogies should be commensurate with students' prior knowledge of physics and mathematics involved.

2025-12-11T19:11:26Z 37 pages, 16 figures Education Sciences 15(10), 1314 (2025) Paul D. Justice Emily Marshman Chandralekha Singh 10.3390/educsci15101314