https://arxiv.org/api/fNTg7BgTjdhyv1Zvakw5SAIk3Lw2026-06-10T09:34:02Z459712015http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13512v1A Versatile Laboratory Approach to Reproduce and Analyze Internal Ocean Wave Dynamics2026-03-13T18:44:34ZInternal waves, or waves that propagate within a stratified fluid, may break and cause mixing. While each individual mixing event may be small, collectively, internal wave breaking drive processes in the ocean that are critical to understanding the maritime climate and biosphere. In this paper we show how to set up an experiment, suitable for an undergraduate-level lab, that illustrates a common generation and breaking mechanism in the ocean. In particular, we show how the process changes in response to a non dimensional parameter, the buoyancy Reynolds number, that can be easily varied. This parameter highlights the role of viscous vs. inertial/buoyancy forces. We outline our methods of creating a linear stratification, injecting energy with a forced topography, and analyzing the resulting dynamics with Background Oriented Schlieren and energy spectra from a conductivity probe. By altering our forcing to accommodate three values of the buoyancy Reynolds, three distinct internal wave regimes can be observed: no turbulence, slight turbulence, and extreme turbulence. Our methods aim to increase the accessibility to studying these internal waves in future experimental work, ocean modeling, and math and physics undergraduate learning.2026-03-13T18:44:34ZVohn JacquezZachary PhanZachary TaebelDylan BruneiPierre-Yves PassaggiaAlberto Scottihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13451v1Ultralight Dark Matter: Undergraduate Physics in Modern Cosmology2026-03-13T15:24:21ZUltralight dark matter is a hypothetical class of particle with a number of interesting theoretical and experimental properties, many of which are best understood by direct analogy with or application of undergraduate physics. We present a series of exercises and discussions which may inspire the reader to bring contemporary research on ultralight dark matter into the undergraduate classroom.2026-03-13T15:24:21Z4 pages, 1 figure, plus solutions and references. Submitted to Am. J. Phys. for a special issue on motivating physics learning through research applicationsTimothy D. Wiserhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12158v1Student experiences in a computational physics lab through the lens of Physics Computational Literacy2026-03-12T16:55:00ZComputational physics is a key part of what it means to do physics in the twenty-first century. However, upper division computational physics remains a largely understudied area. We set out to understand the experiences of students in an upper division computational physics lab course. To that end we conducted semi-structured interviews with five students at the end of their second of three terms in the course sequence. We then analyzed these interviews utilizing the emerging framework of Physics Computational Literacy. We found that the way students express how they learn computational physics implies they are making tradeoffs between their development of the different aspects of computational literacy. Additionally, we found that how students approach developing social computational literacy varies across individuals, and is driven by unspoken assumptions.2026-03-12T16:55:00Z2025 PERC Proceedings [Washington, DC, August 6-7, 2025], edited by A. Pawl, J. P. Zwolak, and A. E. LeakLuke NearhoodPatti Hamerski10.1119/perc.2025.pr.Nearhoodhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12154v1Investigating student perceptions of creativity and generative ai in computational physics2026-03-12T16:52:22ZGenerative Artificial Intelligence (gen-AI) is rapidly becoming more integrated into today's classrooms in all ranges of education. In higher education, Gen-AI is often seen as a resource for students, aiding them in drafting outlines, solving simple mathematical problems, or even decoding or constructing code. In this paper, we analyze essay-based interviews (N=6) from an upper-division computational physics course, in which physics majors addressed their views and attitudes towards Gen-AI and how it affects their learning. We analyzed the concepts of creativity and gen-AI using the Four C Model, a framework encompassing four types of creativity. Our analysis of the data involved coding and characterizing students' definitions of creativity and generative AI. Our findings revealed two main observations: first, students conceptualized their creativity primarily within mini-c and little-c; second, students perceived gen-AI as a resource and learning tool but expressed skepticism regarding its accuracy and creativity.2026-03-12T16:52:22Z2024 PERC Proceedings [Boston, MA, July 10-11, 2024], edited by Q. X. Ryan, A. Pawl, and J. P. ZwolakPachi HerPatti Hamerski10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Herhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10959v1Using tablets and smartphones as experimental tools in the physics classroom: effects on learning and motivation2026-03-11T16:47:32ZAccording to the literature, mobile devices as experimental tools (MDET) can offer educational benefits by creating authentic, real-life contexts for physics learning, enhancing student motivation through the use of familiar technology, and supporting cognitive processes by providing multiple representations of phenomena. However, concerns have been raised about potential distractions and cognitive overload. Regarding these conflicting perspectives, few empirical studies on the impact of MDET in real classroom settings of regular, full-length physics courses are available, focusing on a non-specialized high-school target group. We present a study of a mechanics course in such a new setting, addressing the tight curricular, material, and practical constraints inherent to it. A quasi experimental pre post design comparing a treatment group using MDET and a control group without (same content, lesson plan, and teachers) was used. The 19-week teaching sequence focused on conceptual learning and motivational outcomes, controlled by several predictor variables. Findings reveal substantial pre post learning gains for both groups (Cohen d = 0.9) and small gains for perceived relation to reality (d = 0.29). But no significant differences between treatments were found, indicating that MDET do not outperform conventional teaching under the given constraints. Moreover, no evidence of negative effects such as distraction or cognitive overload was observed, and little to no interactions with predictors such as gender or prior knowledge were found. In conclusion, MDET show considerable potential as an effective option for integrating technology into teaching, offering learning outcomes comparable to those of successful conventional teaching, but not better.2026-03-11T16:47:32Z32 pages, 5 figures, 10 tablesPhys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010129 (2026)Alice GaspariniFlorian SternMarine DelavalAndreas Müller10.1103/96gp-gqvjhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08394v1Bound states in a semi-infinite square potential well2026-03-09T13:52:32ZThe finite square potential well is a staple problem in introductory quantum mechanics. There is an extensive literature on the determination of the allowed energies, which requires the solution of a transcendental equation by numerical, graphical or approximate analytic methods. Here we investigate the less explored problem of a particle in a semi-infinite potential well. The energy eigenvalues, which are also determined by a transcendental equation, are found by a standard graphical method, and a simple rule that yields the number of stationary states is provided. Next a simplification of the aforementioned transcendental equation is attempted. During the process pitfalls are encountered and a purportedly simpler graphical treatment of the problem given in the solutions manual to a fine textbook is shown to be flawed. A more careful analysis brings forth the correct simplification, which is shown to be particularly suitable for finding highly accurate approximations to the energy levels. Finally, a class of exact solutions is produced, the associated normalized eigenfunctions are constructed and the probability of finding the particle inside the well is computed.2026-03-09T13:52:32Z14 pages, 6 figures, to appear in Revista Brasileira de Ensino de FísicaNivaldo A. Lemoshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06342v2How undergraduate physics students use generative AI for computational modeling2026-03-09T09:13:46ZGenerative artificial intelligence (genAI) is becoming increasingly prevalent and capable in physics, particularly for programming-related tasks. How, then, does genAI affect students' computational modeling? We interviewed 19 undergraduate students who had recently completed an open-ended computational assignment that encouraged the use of genAI, asking them how they used it. We then conducted a thematic analysis of these interviews using a framework for computational modeling in physics. We found that genAI significantly impacts several aspects of students' computational modeling, such as the planning, implementing, and debugging of computational models. GenAI can also help students find resources and introduce them to new computational tools. Productive use of genAI was associated with students limiting its use to small steps in the modeling process and consistently double-checking the formulas, explanations, and code it provided. We also identified challenges students faced due to an over-reliance on genAI, such as working from false model assumptions and not spending time learning the fundamentals of computational modeling, especially debugging. Finally, we discuss implications for teaching, such as the need to teach students how to use genAI productively and to urge them to plan before they code. We also highlight the continued value of low-stakes assessment and teaching assistants for teaching computational modeling, as the task remains difficult even with the introduction of genAI.2026-03-06T14:48:04ZKarl Henrik FredlyTor Ole B. OddenBenjamin M. Zwicklhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07457v1How Well Do AI Systems Solve AP Physics? A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models on Algebra-Based Free Response Questions2026-03-08T04:16:06ZThe rapid advancement of LLMs has generated growing interest in their potential role in physics education and assessment, yet a focused evaluation of their performance on multi-faceted, free-response physics problems remains underexplored. In this study, we systematically evaluate the performance of four widely accessible AI systems-ChatGPT 4.1 mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Claude 4.0 Sonnet, and DeepSeek R1-on AP Physics 1 and 2 free-response questions administered between 2015 and 2025. Model-generated solutions were produced under standardized exam-style prompting and evaluated by three independent physics experts using official College Board scoring guidelines. All models achieved relatively high mean scores (82-92%), indicating strong capability in structured algebraic problem solving. However, substantial year-to-year variability was observed, particularly for AP Physics 1, where statistical testing revealed no consistent performance hierarchy among models. In contrast, AP Physics 2 results showed statistically significant differences, with Gemini and DeepSeek demonstrating more consistent performance than Claude. A qualitative analysis revealed recurring error patterns across all models, including misinterpretation of diagrams and graphs, incorrect graph construction, incorrect reasoning about vector direction, circuit topology errors, partial and misleading qualitative explanations, and difficulties applying three-dimensional concepts such as the right-hand rule. These findings suggest that while contemporary AI systems can effectively support routine physics problem solving, they remain limited in tasks requiring spatial reasoning, visual interpretation, and conceptual integration. The results highlight both the instructional potential and current pedagogical limitations of AI-assisted learning tools in physics education.2026-03-08T04:16:06Z10 pages, 3 figuresBilas PaulJashandeep KaurShantanu ChakrabortyShruti Shresthahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13336v1Gamification in Radiocommunications: A Board Game Approach to Boost Engagement and Learning2026-03-06T20:21:09ZCourses in electromagnetism and related technical subjects are often dominated by lecture-heavy instruction and complex mathematical concepts, which can make it difficult for students to stay engaged. This is particularly problematic in today's hyper-digitalized society, where constant screen exposure and shortened attention spans challenge traditional learning methods. While computer-based tools and hands-on laboratories offer some pedagogical improvements, they often fall short in terms of interactivity, dynamism, adaptiveness, and student engagement. In an effort to enrich the learning experience and boost student motivation, we have created a gamified learning activity for the undergraduate course "Radiocommunications"-commonly referred to as Antennas and Propagation in other institutions-, implemented in the form of a question-based board game. The activity, carried out over three academic years, is fully aligned with the course syllabus and encourages active learning, healthy competition, and collaborative problem-solving. Custom-made materials-including a game board, 270 question cards, wildcards, and incentive-based rewards-were developed specifically for this purpose. Qualitative results from a student survey, together with statistical evidence from hypothesis testing, suggest that the activity enhances conceptual understanding, helps students connect ideas across related subjects, and contributes to a more motivating and enjoyable learning experience.2026-03-06T20:21:09ZAna S. DomenechAntonio Alex-Amorhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06490v1Learning Together: A Format for Reflective Turn-Based Sharing in Physics2026-03-06T17:17:33ZHere, we present a simple, low-cost format for structured speaking and listening on historical, cultural, and equity-related topics within a physics institute. In this article, we describe how we run hour-long Learning Together sessions, including what you need, how to set expectations (this is not a debate, nor is it open discussion), and practical facilitation moves that help participants reflect safely on unfamiliar and sometimes difficult material. We aim to offer a replicable recipe that instructors and departments can adapt to their own contexts.2026-03-06T17:17:33Z10 pagesJames DayKatherine R. HerpergerKyle Monkmanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04679v3Canadian Physics Counts: An exploration of the diverse identities of physics students and professionals in Canada2026-03-05T22:04:59ZThe lack of diversity in physics remains a persistent worldwide problem. Despite being a quantitative discipline which relies on measurements to construct and validate hypotheses, there remains a paucity of data on both demographics and experiences of marginalized groups. In Canada, there has never been a nationwide assessment of those studying or working in physics. Here, we present findings from Canadian Physics Counts: the first national survey of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in the Canadian physics community. Our intersectional approach allowed us to gather a wealth of information on gender identity, sexual orientation, race, disability, and more. Analyses revealed key findings, including the first data on physicists who identify as non-binary or gender diverse, as well as the first data on Black and Indigenous scholars. Black physicists (1.2%) and Indigenous physicists (.3%) were found to be the most underrepresented, while White men were overrepresented across all sectors. Among respondents with a disability, 5% reported receiving full accommodations for their required needs at their place of work or study. One in four respondents from BIPOC gender diverse backgrounds identified as being disabled, and the proportion of sexually diverse students who reported having a disability was more than three times higher than the proportion of heterosexual students with a disability. The data also revealed that students represented more demographic diversity than working professionals, highlighting the importance of acting today in order to retain the diverse physicists of tomorrow. Our analysis identifies areas for intervention and offers recommendations for building a diverse and inclusive physics community in Canada that can be a global exemplar.2024-03-07T17:24:32Z16 pages, 8 figuresEden J. HennesseyAnastasia SmolinaSkye HennesseyAdrianna TassoneAlex JayShohini GhoseKevin Hewitthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04721v1A Rotation-Compensated Smartphone Accelerometer Application for Undergraduate Mechanics Experiments2026-03-05T01:48:51ZSmartphones equipped with sensors such as accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers offer valuable opportunities for physics education, allowing students to measure motion using their own devices. However, commonly used applications provide acceleration only in the device-fixed coordinate system, which makes it difficult to analyze two- or three-dimensional motion when the device rotates. To address this limitation, we developed a web-based accelerometer application that can provide acceleration in a stationary global coordinate system. This is achieved by simultaneously recording acceleration in the device-fixed coordinate system and Euler angles, and converting them to rotation-compensated acceleration in real time. We also built a companion web application for numerical integration, noise reduction, and visualization of the measured data. Both applications are installation-free and can be accessed directly through a smartphone browser.
We demonstrate the capabilities of the newly developed system through several representative types of motion, including sliding motion, projectile motion, and circular motion, by showing that rotation-compensated acceleration enables accurate reconstruction of velocity, displacement, and trajectories even when the smartphone changes its orientation. The applications were implemented in undergraduate mechanics classes, where students used them in group-based experiments. Classroom observations suggested that the use of these tools facilitated a deeper understanding of the relationships among acceleration, velocity, and position. These results suggest that rotation-compensated smartphone measurements provide a practical and effective tool for physics education.2026-03-05T01:48:51Z11 pages, 13 figures, 1 tableKeita NishiokaYasuhiro Tanakahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04657v1Stan: An LLM-based thermodynamics course assistant2026-03-04T22:44:50ZDiscussions of AI in education focus predominantly on student-facing tools -- chatbots, tutors, and problem generators -- while the potential for the same infrastructure to support instructors remains largely unexplored. We describe Stan, a suite of tools for an undergraduate chemical engineering thermodynamics course built on a data pipeline that we develop and deploy in dual roles: serving students and supporting instructors from a shared foundation of lecture transcripts and a structured textbook index. On the student side, a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline answers natural-language queries by extracting technical terms, matching them against the textbook index, and synthesizing grounded responses with specific chapter and page references. On the instructor side, the same transcript corpus is processed through structured analysis pipelines that produce per-lecture summaries, identify student questions and moments of confusion, and catalog the anecdotes and analogies used to motivate difficult material -- providing a searchable, semester-scale record of teaching that supports course reflection, reminders, and improvement. All components, including speech-to-text transcription, structured content extraction, and interactive query answering, run entirely on locally controlled hardware using open-weight models (Whisper large-v3, Llama~3.1 8B) with no dependence on cloud APIs, ensuring predictable costs, full data privacy, and reproducibility independent of third-party services. We describe the design, implementation, and practical failure modes encountered when deploying 7--8 billion parameter models for structured extraction over long lecture transcripts, including context truncation, bimodal output distributions, and schema drift, along with the mitigations that resolved them.2026-03-04T22:44:50Z17 pages, 6 figures. For associated code repository, see https://github.com/EntropicLearners/stan.gitEric M. FurstVasudevan Venkateshwaranhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04616v1Chatbot Conversations in Physics Education: Using Artificial Intelligence to Analyze Student Reasoning through Computational Grounded Theory2026-03-04T21:20:55ZThis study applies Computational Grounded Theory (CGT) to analyze student misconceptions using interaction data from an AI-powered chatbot deployed in a university-level Modern Physics course. The chatbot - the UTA Study Buddy Bot - engaged students in peer-like problem-solving conversations throughout the semester, generating a rich dataset of over 10 million tokens. To explore patterns in student reasoning and identify recurring conceptual difficulties, we implemented a CGT pipeline that combined natural language processing, unsupervised clustering of sentence-level vector embeddings, human interpretation of emergent themes, and supervised learning to evaluate the generalizability of identified categories. Preliminary results revealed persistent misconceptions in areas such as relativistic momentum and quantum energy levels, along with distinctive trends in how students phrased their questions and expressed uncertainty. These findings underscore the potential of CGT as a scalable, theory-aligned approach for extracting insights from chatbot dialogues and guiding the development of more adaptive, AI-driven educational tools in physics instruction.2026-03-04T21:20:55ZAtharva DangeRamon E. Lopezhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10268v2Balancing the Byline: Exploring Gender and Authorship Patterns in Canadian Science Publishing Journals2026-03-04T20:33:00ZCanada is internationally recognized for its leadership in science and its commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields. Despite this leadership, limited research has examined gender disparities in scientific publishing within the Canadian context. This study analyzes over 67,000 articles published in 24 Canadian Science Publishing (CSP) journals between 2010 and 2021 to better understand patterns of gender representation. Findings show that women accounted for less than one-third of published authors across CSP journals. Representation varied by discipline, with higher proportions of women in biomedical sciences and lower proportions of women in engineering - trends that mirror broader national and global patterns. Notably, the proportion of women submitting manuscripts closely matched those published, suggesting that broader workforce disparities may play a larger role than publication bias. Women were less likely to be solo authors or to hold prominent authorship positions, such as first or last author - roles typically associated with research leadership and career advancement. These findings point to the need for a two-fold response: continued efforts to address systemic barriers to women's participation in science, and a review of publishing practices to ensure equitable access, recognition, and inclusion for all researchers.2025-12-11T04:14:12ZSupplementary Information includedEden J. HennesseyAmanda DesnoyersMargaret ChristAdrianna TassoneSkye HennesseyBianca DreyerAlex JayPatricia SanchezShohini Ghose