https://arxiv.org/api/frx5TEPV1PShCHJCOvFWE/H8u7Q 2026-06-10T08:30:29Z 4597 105 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26966v1 2026-03-27T20:14:51Z

The powerful techniques of holographic quantum chromodynamics (QCD) can be employed in the investigation of glueballs -- composite particles made solely of gluons, the strong nuclear force mediators. In particular, the so-called hardwall model yields predictions for the values of the masses of various glueball states, which are related to the solutions of the differential equations of the model. It turns out that those equations are essentially the same as the ones governing the vibrations of a circular membrane like that of a drumhead, which may serve as extra motivation for studying the dynamics of such an object as an undergraduate physics student.

2026-03-27T20:14:51Z 12 pages, no figures Thales Azevedo Henrique Boschi-Filho http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25984v1 2026-03-27T00:12:04Z

We discuss the results of using large language models (LLMs) to conduct original scientific research in an unfamiliar subject area during the Fall 2025 semester. Students in a graduate astronomy and astrophysics course were asked to test whether LLMs could help them complete research tasks faster and at a level of detail and accuracy required for scientific publication. Most students employed LLMs for a total of 5-10 hours. While all students completed a draft paper on an unsolved problem related to galaxies by semester's end, their impressions of the models' value varied. About half thought that the models saved them time. Many noted that LLMs failed to provide appropriately detailed insights or steps to addressing open, niche questions over a several-month timeframe. The LLMs also frequently (about 20% of the time) returned false citations, links, or summaries of papers. The models struggled with generating complex functional code, accessing online packages or Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), and retrieving astronomical datasets from existing archives. In writing code and in chats, the LLMs made implicit, overly simplifying assumptions and often doubled down even after being corrected. Given the rapid pace of LLM development, new models may soon address at least some of these issues and thus significantly enhance research productivity. Yet students expressed concerns about how LLM use might dampen creativity and reflection during the research process. To improve learning experiences in future semesters, the class will first discuss LLM best practices and limitations. Students will be encouraged to explore free online resources for tips for generative model applications and will decide for themselves whether to use LLMs for their research project. This white paper was not written using LLMs.

2026-03-27T00:12:04Z 17 pages; white paper about a graduate class experiment on using LLMs for scientific research in Fall 2025 at the University of Arizona Ann Zabludoff Chen-Yu Chuang Parker Thomas Johnson Yichen Liu Brina Bianca Martinez Neev Shah Lucille Steffes Gabriel Glen Weible http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25653v1 2026-03-26T17:05:02Z

The teapot effect refers to the tendency of a poured liquid to cling to the lip of a container and run down the outside. It is a familiar but physically rich example of flow separation. We present a low-cost experiment for introductory physics laboratories that uses 3D-printed cups, a simple flow regulator, and basic surface treatments to explore this phenomenon in a classroom setting. Students measure the run-off length along the outer wall as an accessible indicator of sticking versus separation and use it to compare the effects of flow velocity and surface wettability. Rather than attempting a full quantitative test of research-level models, the activity is designed to illustrate the inertial-capillary picture of the teapot effect in a form that is experimentally straightforward and pedagogically effective. The experiment connects a familiar everyday observation to fluid inertia, wetting, and interfacial forces in a form that is well suited to introductory instruction.

2026-03-26T17:05:02Z 8 pages, 3 figures Yu-Chen Guo Jin-Ming Wang Ying-Xin Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24498v1 2026-03-25T16:39:03Z

This study investigates the impact of educational comics as an active learning strategy in physics workshops for undergraduate students in Chemistry and Pharmacy and Biochemistry during the second semester of 2025. Conceptual understanding was assessed using the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), and student motivation and attitudes toward physics were evaluated through a Likert-type survey administered in pre- and post-test formats. The results show an average normalized gain of g = 0.21 on the FCI, corresponding to a low-to-medium range according to physics education research. A higher gain is observed in items directly related to the intervened content (g = 0.23) compared to non-intervened items (g = 0.19), suggesting that instructional design influences domain-specific conceptual development. At the motivational level, improvements are observed in student interest, self-efficacy, and perceived usefulness of physics, along with a reduction in negative emotional responses toward the subject. These findings indicate that educational comics can serve as an effective pedagogical scaffold, promoting positive learning dispositions and supporting targeted conceptual development in non-physics undergraduate contexts.

2026-03-25T16:39:03Z 8 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables Mauricio Echiburu Camilo Henriquez Rodrigo Valdés Cristobal Ríos http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24409v1 2026-03-25T15:22:55Z

This article provides a gentle, visual introduction to the basic concepts of differential geometry appropriate for students familiar with special relativity. Visual methods are used to explain basics of differential geometry and build intuition for all types of Riemannian and Lorentzian manifolds of constant curvature. A visual derivation of the Thomas precession is given, showcasing the utility of differential geometry while also pointing a spotlight at certain intricacies of Minkowski space crucial from a pedagogical perspective. In addition, a straightforward method to generate some Carter-Penrose diagrams -- suitable for students with no differential geometry knowledge -- is presented, and a new method of indicating distortion on spacetime diagrams is shown.

2026-03-25T15:22:55Z 14 pages, 19 figures, preprint Karol Urbański http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24622v1 2026-03-24T22:00:28Z

Harmful experiences such as harassment and discrimination continue to push many people out of science. To better understand identities and experiences of harm among physicists, we conducted Canadian Physics Counts, the first comprehensive national survey examining equity, diversity, and inclusion within Canada's physics community. To better understand identities and experiences of harm among physicists, we conducted Canadian Physics Counts, the first comprehensive national survey examining equity, diversity, and inclusion within Canada's physics community. We explored experiences of harm focusing on personal harassment, sexual harassment, and sexual assault. We measured both direct experiences of harm and awareness of harm happening to others. Our analyses revealed that women and gender-diverse physicists reported experiencing personal harassment at twice the rate of men, a pattern consistent across all academic positions, including students and early-career researchers. An intersectional focus revealed even deeper inequities. Black women and men reported the highest rates of personal harassment, while Indigenous women and men faced elevated levels of sexual harassment. Physicists with disabilities were disproportionately affected. Disabled women and gender-diverse respondents reported the highest rates of personal and sexual harassment and sexual assault, and disabled men experienced more personal harassment than men without disabilities. These findings are a clear call to action to the physics community to confront racism, sexism, homophobia, and ableism so every physicist can thrive and contribute to solving society's greatest challenges.

2026-03-24T22:00:28Z Part 2 of the Canadian Physics Counts survey. Part 1 available at arXiv:2403.04679 Adrianna Tassone Eden J. Hennessey Anastasia Smolina Skye Hennessey Kevin Hewitt Shohini Ghose http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20412v1 2026-03-20T18:32:20Z

This study explores how generative artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, can assist in the evaluation of laboratory reports in Experimental Physics. Two interaction modalities were implemented: an automated API-based evaluation and a customized ChatGPT configuration designed to emulate instructor feedback. The analysis focused on two complementary dimensions-formal and structural integrity, and technical accuracy and conceptual depth. Findings indicate that ChatGPT provides consistent feedback on organization, clarity, and adherence to scientific conventions, while its evaluation of technical reasoning and interpretation of experimental data remains less reliable. Each modality exhibited distinctive limitations, particularly in processing graphical and mathematical information. The study contributes to understanding how the use of AI in evaluating laboratory reports can inform feedback practices in experimental physics, highlighting the importance of teacher supervision to ensure the validity of physical reasoning and the accurate interpretation of experimental results.

2026-03-20T18:32:20Z 16 pages, 1 fig Marcos Abreu Álvaro Suárez Cecilia Stari Arturo C. Marti http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00032v1 2026-03-20T15:57:26Z

We describe a novel masters-level projects class that teaches robotics along the traditional robotics pipeline (dynamics, state estimation, controls, planning). One key motivational part is that students have to directly apply the algorithms they learn on a highly constrained compute platform, effectively making a robot fly. We teach nonlinear algorithms as deployed in state-of-the-art flight stacks such as PX4. Didactically, we rely on two core concepts: 1) avoidance of provided black-box software infrastructure, and 2) usage of the safe and efficient programming language Rust that is used on the PC (for simulation) and an STM32 microcontroller (for robot deployment). We discuss our methodology and the student feedback over two years with ten students each. Teaching material: https://imrclab.github.io/teaching/flying-robots

2026-03-20T15:57:26Z Accepted at the International Conference on Robotics in Education (RiE), 2026 Wolfgang Hoenig Christoph Scherer Khaled Wahba http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17966v1 2026-03-18T17:34:28Z

Despite nation efforts to promote diversity and inclusion, women and gender minorities remain underrepresented in physics. One common approach to studying gender in physics contexts treats gender as a categorical identity variable (e.g. "man," "woman"). In contrast, approaches that center gender expression focus on the nuanced and context-dependent ways in which gender is socially enacted and interpreted. They are therefore well-suited for exploring how gender permeates the small-scale interactions that ultimately shape students' persistence and perceptions of inclusivity. In the present study, we utilized gender expression as a lens to investigate gendered patterns in introductory undergraduate physics students' sense of belonging in the discipline. Specifically, this qualitative investigation expands on our previous quantitative work to investigate why students may feel misperceived by their peers in physics and how that experience influences their belonging. Results indicated that students' sense of belonging may be impacted by perceived pressures to alter their gender expression in physics contexts. Many interviewees expressed a felt need to present themselves more "masculinely" to fit in. Contrastingly, pressure to present "femininely" was most often associated with standing out. Implications for supporting students' authentic self-ex in physics contexts are discussed.

2026-03-18T17:34:28Z Noah Leibnitz Yangqiuting Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16638v1 2026-03-17T15:11:22Z

The aim of this study is to investigate the decisions and reasoning of undergraduate students when choosing simple measurement instruments in an introductory physics laboratory course. For this study, we have developed a questionnaire and implemented it in a pre-/post-test manner to analyze the influence of lab instruction on both students' decisions and reasoning. To characterize students' justifications, we have inductively developed a coding manual that captures the nuances of students' reasoning when choosing an instrument. It shows that students consider different aspects for their decisions, such as data quality, practical and personal considerations. We have also found that laboratory instruction influenced both students' decisions and justifications, leading to a stronger emphasis on data quality. In fact, after instruction, the majority of students choose the instrument with lower uncertainty and base their justifications mainly on the aim of reducing uncertainties, avoiding systematic effects or mistakes in the instrument reading, and less often than before instruction on personal experience and intuition. These findings suggest that dedicating specific laboratory instruction sessions on measurements and data quality, and having students choose between different instrumentation and provide a justification for their decision, can positively impact students' habits in the laboratory and encourage them to base their choices on evidence rather than intuition.

2026-03-17T15:11:22Z 15 pages, 4 figures Micol Alemani Karel Kok Eva Philippaki http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12127v2 2026-03-17T06:16:16Z

The Bernstein-Vazirani (BV) algorithm is frequently taught as a canonical example of quantum parallelism, yet the standard interference-based explanation often obscures its underlying simplicity. We present a geometric reframing in which the Hadamard gate "wrapping" acts as a global basis rotation rather than a generator of computational complexity. This perspective reveals that the algorithm is effectively a classical linear computation over GF(2) performed in the conjugate Fourier basis, with the apparent parallelism arising from coordinate transformation. Building on Mermin's earlier pedagogical shortcut, which presented a 'classical' circuit equivalent but stopped short of explicitly labeling it as such, we elevate this to a formal geometric framework. In the extension, we distinguish between globally rotated circuits -- which we reveal as classical linear computations -- and topologically twisted circuits that generate quantum entanglement. We introduce a pedagogical taxonomy distinguishing (1) pure computational-basis circuits, (2) globally rotated circuits (exemplified by Bernstein-Vazirani), and (3) topologically twisted circuits involving non-aligned subsystem bases. This framework allows viewing the Gottesman-Knill theorem from a new angle, extends students' understanding of phase kickback and the 'Ricochet Property'. Furthermore, it provides a more intuitive starting point for explaining Bell-pair extensions through concrete circuit derivations and Qiskit simulations suitable for undergraduate quantum information courses. The outlook explores how this geometric view paves the way for understanding entanglement as topological twists.

2026-03-12T16:29:39Z 28 pages, 11 figures. Includes Qiskit circuit simulations in Appendix and an ancillary Jupyter Notebook Bartosz Chmura http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15056v1 2026-03-16T10:07:59Z

We present a low-cost experimental setup to measure the Boltzmann constant (kB) and the elementary charge (e) through thermal and shot noise, achieving relative accuracies of up to 1%. The system utilizes a cost-effective ADC module integrated with a carefully selected low-noise audio operational amplifier, resulting in a simple and compact circuit design that better satisfies experimental requirements. Furthermore, the approach employs a dual-channel sampling method to measure cross-correlation noise, thereby significantly reducing the uncorrelated background noise of the device and improving the signal-to-noise ratio. The noise measurement methodology offers an intuitive demonstration of microscopic fluctuations, making it a valuable teaching tool. In addition, the experimental setup employs standard electronic components, is low cost and robust, making it well-suited for widespread adoption in university and even high school laboratories.

2026-03-16T10:07:59Z Zitong Peng Jie Zheng Xiaokai Yue http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14888v1 2026-03-16T06:38:36Z

We present a fully reproducible demonstration of an AI-assisted scientific workflow designed for a broad physics, mathematics, and computer-science readership. The initial project artifact stack was generated from one single user prompt and then reviewed and curated for submission by the human author. Rather than claiming a new scientific discovery, the manuscript uses canonical benchmark problems with exact, manufactured, or independently checkable answers. The analytical component starts from the one-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator, derives its dimensionless form, and validates finite-difference eigenpairs against exact Hermite-function benchmarks. The numerical partial-differential-equation component solves a heat equation with a known modal solution and a Poisson problem verified by a manufactured solution, with explicit convergence studies. The inverse-modeling component fits synthetic damped-oscillation data by nonlinear least squares and quantifies parametric uncertainty by bootstrap resampling. The computational-science component compares dense and sparse eigensolvers and contrasts direct and iterative sparse linear solvers, with careful interpretation of machine-dependent timing data. Taken together, the results show that contemporary AI can already serve as a useful scientific copilot for derivation, implementation, validation, visualization, and manuscript preparation, provided that each stage is constrained by benchmark theory, explicit verification, and transparent artifacts. The demonstration is therefore relevant not because the underlying science is novel, but because it offers a concrete template for trustworthy AI use in technical research practice.

2026-03-16T06:38:36Z 10 pages, 5 figures Kin Hung Fung http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14732v1 2026-03-16T02:09:06Z

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered for automated assessment and feedback, understanding when LLM marking can be trusted is essential. We evaluate LLM-as-a-judge marking across three physics assessment formats - structured questions, written essays, and scientific plots - comparing GPT-5.2, Grok 4.1, Claude Opus 4.5, DeepSeek-V3.2, Gemini Pro 3, and committee aggregations against human markers under blind, solution-provided, false-solution, and exemplar-anchored conditions. For $n=771$ blind university exam questions, models achieve fractional mean absolute errors (fMAE) $\approx 0.22$ with robust discriminative validity (Spearman $ρ> 0.6$). For secondary and university structured questions ($n=1151$), providing official solutions reduces MAE and strengthens validity (committee $ρ= 0.88$); false solutions degrade absolute accuracy but leave rank ordering largely intact (committee $ρ= 0.77$; individual models $ρ\geq 0.59$). Essay marking behaves fundamentally differently. Across $n=55$ scripts ($n=275$ essays), blind AI marking is harsher and more variable than human marking, with discriminative validity already poor ($ρ\approx 0.1$). Adding a mark scheme does not improve discrimination ($ρ\approx 0$; all confidence intervals include zero). Anchored exemplars shift the AI mean close to the human mean and compress variance below the human standard deviation, but discriminative validity remains near-zero - distributional agreement can occur without valid discrimination. For code-based plot elements ($n=1400$), models achieve exceptionally high discriminative validity ($ρ> 0.84$) with near-linear calibration. Across all task types, validity tracks criterion-referenceability - the extent to which a task maps to explicit, observable grading features - and benchmark reliability, rather than raw model capability.

2026-03-16T02:09:06Z 25 pages, 26 figures Will Yeadon Tom Hardy Paul Mackay Elise Agra http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14652v1 2026-03-15T23:13:48Z

This research uses 10 years of institutional data at a large public university in the USA to investigate trends in the undergraduate majors students declare, drop, and earn degrees, especially comparing physics to other disciplines. We find that physics has the lowest number of students of all science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines and it also has the highest rates of attrition of students who declare a major. While many STEM disciplines have students migrating both in and out of those majors, physics primarily has a uni-directional migration of students out of the major. Furthermore, physics has the lowest percentage of women undergraduate majors. Using an equity framework, we view these findings as signatures of inequitable and non-inclusive culture. We suggest that important roles may be played by stereotypes such as the incorrect belief that physics is accessible only to brilliant men, the issue of first-year college physics courses failing to energize students, and apathy in large physics departments toward improving intentional recruitment and retention of physics majors.

2026-03-15T23:13:48Z Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice; West Palm Beach Vol. 22, Iss. 17, (2022): 63-81 Kyle M. Whitcomb Danny Doucette Chandralekha Singh 10.33423/jhetp.v22i17.5658