https://arxiv.org/api/qVd8ROb4wkF9DlWJr2sUoCQAODs2026-09-11T19:06:59Z4685015http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13344v2What good is modeling? Introducing ecology and evolution students to theory2026-09-10T17:43:42ZTheory and empirical science should be in constant dialogue, but often find it hard to understand one another. Here we describe a graduate-level university course we developed to improve matters. The course was designed to help empirically focused biology graduate students read and understand theory papers, despite little prior mathematical training. It uses several evidence-based principles of modern teaching: backwards design, active learning, and just-in-time teaching. This curricular content, emphasizing the nature of evidence and the role of theory in science, aims to improve critical thinking as a means of accelerating scientific progress.2026-04-14T23:10:05ZAnna DornhausJoanna Maselhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11659v1Questioning your brilliance in physics: Differential shifts in fixed mindsets by grade and gender2026-09-10T15:02:40ZStudents' domain-specific mindsets and their beliefs about their capacity to improve through effort play a crucial role in shaping their experiences and decisions to persist in STEM disciplines. Physics is generally seen as a field requiring innate brilliance, which can reinforce fixed mindsets, particularly after initial setbacks in performance that are common in introductory university courses. In this study, we examine changes in fixed mindsets and potential gender differences in an introductory calculus-based physics course. Our sample consisted of 508 students with an average age of 18, predominantly White, with men comprising the majority. Based upon survey response distributions, three distinct mindset categories were identified: Hesitant, Hopeful, and Confident, describing how strongly students rejected a fixed mindset in physics. The results suggested large gender differences in distributions at the high and low-end groups. We also found an overall decline toward fixed mindsets across the course, and logistic regressions controlling for initial mindsets showed that women were significantly more likely than men to shift away from the Confident category. While the majority of men tended to stay within the Confident category, the majority of women moved away from it. Particularly, this differential shift was seen among students receiving Bs or Cs, the most commonly awarded grades in this course. Furthermore, there were relatively small differences in the probability of change within men as a function of grades received, whereas women showed marked declines toward fixed beliefs with either a B or C. Our findings provide empirical evidence for the dynamic, grade-sensitive nature of students' mindsets in a calculus-based physics course.2026-09-10T15:02:40ZSeifollahi, F., C. D. Schunn, and C. Singh. 2026. "Questioning Your Brilliance in Physics: Differential Shifts in Fixed Mindsets by Grade and Gender." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 63, no. 6: 514-530Fargol SeifollahiChristian D. SchunnChandralekha Singh10.1002/tea.70054http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06490v3Learning Together: A Format for Reflective Turn-Based Sharing in STEM Communities2026-09-09T19:39:01ZHere, we present \textit{Learning Together}: a simple, low-cost format for structured speaking and listening on historical, cultural, and equity-related topics within a physics community. In this article, we describe the process of running these hour-long sessions, including what is needed, how to set expectations for participants, and practical facilitation moves that help participants reflect safely on unfamiliar and sometimes difficult material. We aim to offer a replicable recipe that instructors and departments can adapt to their own contexts.2026-03-06T17:17:33Z13 pagesJames DayKatherine R. HerpergerKyle Monkmanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10717v1GW Explorer: A Beginner's Guide -- Developing a Computational Gravitational-Wave Outreach Curriculum for High School Students2026-09-09T18:13:54ZWe present GW Explorer: A Beginner's Guide, an outreach curriculum designed to introduce high school students to gravitational-wave (GW) astrophysics through interactive Python Jupyter notebooks. Most existing GW resources target beginning audiences and advanced students, leaving a gap at the pre-college level that we directly address. The curriculum integrates foundational physics with hands-on computation implemented through both self-directed and workshop-based instructional formats. In the self-directed format, students completed the curriculum independently on cloud-based platforms such as Google Colab. During the workshop format, students worked through the same activities under the guidance of University of Nevada, Las Vegas graduate student mentors. Topics span gravity, spacetime, GW sources, interferometric detection, and data analysis. An implementation in local high school classrooms informed the content and pacing, and survey results demonstrate gains in conceptual understanding and coding confidence. GW Explorer offers a scalable, open-access framework for authentic astrophysics research in the high school classroom.2026-09-09T18:13:54Z16 pages, 4 figures, 4 tablesRachel LangginBradlee TejedaCarl-Johan Hasterhttp://arxiv.org/abs/0812.3911v3Sunsets, tall buildings and the Earth's radius2026-09-09T14:52:30ZIt is shown how repeated observations of the sunset from various points up a tall building can be used to determine the Earth's radius. The same observations can also be used, at some latitudes, to deduce an approximate value for the amount of atmospheric refraction at the horizon.2008-12-20T02:55:28ZA new endnote has been added to the previous oneP. K. Aravindhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09584v1Mechanics Cognitive Diagnostic: Testing Fine-Grained Learning Objectives in Introductory Physics2026-09-09T01:14:21ZPhysics courses use research-based assessments (RBAs) such as the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE), and Energy and Momentum Conceptual Survey (EMCS) to measure learning in introductory mechanics, but their fixed-length, pretest-posttest design makes them retrospective: posttest scores summarize completed instruction and arrive after a course ends. We are developing the Mechanics Cognitive Diagnostic (MCD), a cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive test that reports students' mastery of fine-grained learning objectives (LOs) throughout instruction. Using evidence-centered design, we defined 14 LOs from introductory mechanics textbooks and AP Physics standards, mapped FCI, FMCE, and EMCS items onto them with a Q-matrix, and refined the mapping with the deterministic inputs, noisy "and" gate (DINA) model, using posttest responses from 24,394 students in 807 courses across 79 institutions through LASSO. The FCI and EMCS achieved good DINA model fit; the FMCE showed marginal fit. Classification accuracy for most LOs met or exceeded benchmarks for low-stakes formative assessment. RBA items, though not developed for LO-level diagnosis, support it reliably, giving the MCD a working 14-LO item bank built from RBAs that physics courses already use. As data accumulate, we can revise or retire weak LOs and items and add new items through online calibration without interrupting testing. We plan to expand the MCD to 35 LOs, two per week, to cover a typical introductory mechanics course.2026-09-09T01:14:21Z16 pages, 9 tables, and 3 figures. This is a preprint intended for submission to Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVy LeJayson M. NissenJason W. MorphewHua Hua ChangBen Van Dusenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08834v1From Local Context to Climate Science: Low-Cost Experimentation in the Initial Training of Physics Teachers2026-09-08T14:54:27ZClimate change poses a major scientific, environmental, and educational challenge, requiring approaches that connect physical concepts, empirical evidence, and socially relevant environmental issues. This study presents and analyzes a low-cost experimental investigation developed within the "Physics and the Environment" course of a Physics teacher training program at the State University of the Tocantina Region of Maranhão (UEMASUL), Brazil. The experiment involved constructing a simplified thermal simulator using accessible materials and comparing a confined system with an open control system, both exposed simultaneously to solar radiation. The results showed that the average temperature inside the simulator was $45.91^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$, compared to $38.58^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ in the external control system, corresponding to a mean temperature difference of $7.33^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ (among other analyses). These results demonstrate that the experimental setup was capable of producing and measuring a significant thermal difference between the two systems. However, the observed temperature rise should not be interpreted as a direct measure of the atmospheric greenhouse effect, given that the experimental apparatus involves both radiative and non-radiative heat transfer mechanisms. The study emphasizes the educational potential of low-cost experimentation as a strategy to integrate electromagnetic radiation, energy balance, temperature, heat transfer, and climate science into the initial training of physics teachers. It also highlights the importance of explicitly discussing the limitations of experimental models and distinguishing local experimental evidence from conclusions regarding global climate processes.2026-09-08T14:54:27Z30 pages, 7 figures, 2 tablesAndré A. A. MarinhoEdson R. L. LopesJhon KF V. SilvaMariana S. CostaMaria A. Moraishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08792v1From data to structure: Construction, breakdown, and reconstruction of an empirical representation in a black-box RC circuit2026-09-08T14:22:12ZIn introductory physics laboratories, a central instructional goal is to help students construct, evaluate, and revise mathematical representations from experimental data rather than apply given formulas. We present a guided data-driven activity in which an RC circuit is treated as a black box defined through observable input-output relations. Experimental and graphical procedures are provided, while standard RC circuit theory is initially withheld. Students first examine discharging data obtained under different nominal values of R and C. They rescale time using T=t/RC and compare the normalized voltage v=V/E across circuit conditions, bringing the discharging data closer to a common trajectory. Graphical linearization through a plot of lnv versus T provides a basis for proposing an empirical representation and allows RC to be interpreted as a time scale rather than being assigned that meaning a priori. When the representation proposed for discharging is tested with charging data, logarithmic linearity is lost despite the continued organization of the data by T. Replacing v with the distance from the steady state, 1-v, restores linearity, and the resulting linear relation provides a basis for proposing a revised representation for charging. The activity thus uses a familiar physical system to make representation construction, breakdown, and reconstruction experimentally explicit. It also emphasizes that an empirical representation must be accompanied by a specified domain of validity and that standard circuit theory can be introduced a posteriori to interpret the physical meanings that emerge from representational constraints.2026-09-08T14:22:12Z38 pages, 3 figures. Substantially revised and retitled version of an earlier preprint posted on Jxiv (https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.4885). Expanded instructional framing and Supplementary Materials on implementation, instructor guidance, student outcomes, and informal classroom observationsKazumasa Kushidahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05719v1AI in Particle Physics Education: Research Problems and Foundational Skills2026-09-04T20:57:32ZGenerative AI can produce perfect solutions to standard physics homework, weakening the connection between submitted work and knowledge a student can use independently. We report a redesign of the introductory nuclear and particle physics course at Ruhr University Bochum, in which AI was permitted and encouraged alongside traditional tools on unusually difficult, research-shaped assignments. We found that most students remained engaged with the assignments throughout the course and produced ambitious work, while the course did not reliably secure its foundational objective. We offer this mixed experience as a reference point for discussion.2026-09-04T20:57:32Z5 pages, 2 figuresM. MikhasenkoM. StahlI. SegalD. ParmarA. ZimmerA. Kazatskyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21618v2AI-Augmented Inquiry and Regulation in Hybrid Systems: A Control Allocation Architecture for Preserving Epistemic Agency in Hybrid Human-AI Cognition2026-09-04T11:25:04ZGenerative artificial intelligence (genAI) systems are increasingly integral to epistemic processes such as hypothesis generation, explanation construction, and decision-making. Although they reliably enhance performance, emerging evidence reveals a metacognitive dilemma: as external generative capacity increases, internal monitoring, calibration, and cognitive engagement may decline. This reflects a redistribution of cognitive control within distributed human-AI systems that cannot be explained by automation bias or reliance on algorithms alone. We propose the AIRIS (AI-Augmented Inquiry and Regulation in Hybrid Systems) framework to analyze this dilemma and specify where regulatory intervention can counteract it. AIRIS is a multi-level control allocation architecture specifying the conditions under which epistemic agency can be preserved in hybrid generative systems. Drawing on distributed cognition, cognitive load theory, multimedia learning, and self-regulated learning, it identifies seven interacting mechanisms through which hybrid cognition may become destabilized, from delegation and calibration drift to motivational-affective drift. Five regulatory operators (Anticipate, Interrogate, Reflect, Integrate, and Synthesize) target internal generative engagement at points of emerging instability. The architecture does not itself improve learning; it specifies what must remain in place for genAI-supported work to sustain understanding, whether through instructional design, teacher guidance, or learners' own regulation. We derive testable propositions concerning the seven mechanisms and the five operators, reframing AI augmentation as a problem of control allocation in distributed generative systems. Beyond theory, AIRIS offers a research agenda, a design framework for genAI-integrated learning environments, and a conceptual toolkit for the governance of hybrid human-AI cognition.2026-08-21T20:32:44ZJochen KuhnPeter GerjetsUlrich TrautweinJeffrey A. GreeneSarah MalonePatrik VogtTim Füttererhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04711v1Building a research-software catalog with a coding agent: from hackathon prototype to public deployment2026-09-04T04:31:51ZGenerative AI and coding agents can accelerate research software development, but they also increase the need for efficient software discovery and maintenance. We developed a repository catalog during a three-day hackathon and subsequently examined the engineering required to make it suitable for public deployment, including adversarial review, data-quality checks, browser-level validation, and publication safeguards. We then explored whether the lessons learned from this prototype could be transferred to a much larger, human-curated portal, through a retrieval agent under development for MateriApps that combines curated portal metadata, external documentation, vector search, and local language-model generation. Implementation with coding agents was rapid, but achieving reliable operation required substantial additional engineering: the most consequential problems were not crashes but silent failures that produced plausible yet incomplete or incorrect outputs, arising from incomplete data acquisition, misleading assessments, and retrieval or preprocessing failures. These observations suggest that AI-assisted software portals require explicit validation, monitoring, and repeated review, and that curated metadata and maintained documentation remain essential. The MateriApps work is exploratory and remains under active development, so the observations reported for it are preliminary; a comparable combination of curated metadata, automatically collected documentation, and retrieval-based assistance may nevertheless be useful for extending other research-software portals.2026-09-04T04:31:51Z23 pages, 6 figures, 2 tablesKazuyoshi YoshimiSatoshi TerasakiGotai Yamadahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04326v1Why the better conductor surges in impedance: a low-cost demonstration of the skin effect at line frequency2026-09-03T18:00:38ZWhen alternating current flows through a conductor, induced internal eddy currents suppress current flow in the core and restrict it to a thin surface layer. Although this effect, known as the skin effect, is covered in virtually every undergraduate electrodynamics course, it is rarely explored experimentally without specialized and expensive equipment, and is sometimes even considered a mere high-frequency phenomenon. Here, we present a readily accessible, quantitative demonstration of the skin effect at line frequency using only standard laboratory supplies: an AC/DC power supply, basic multimeters, and laboratory support rods as cylindrical conductors. Based on a precise four-point Kelvin sensing scheme capable of resolving milliohm-range resistances, we exploit relative magnetic permeability rather than high frequency as the governing parameter to control skin depth. For non-magnetic stainless steel, line frequency represents an electrodynamically low frequency, resulting in identical AC and DC behaviour; whereas for ferromagnetic structural steel, high permeability compresses the skin depth to the millimeter scale, causing a sharp surge in AC impedance. This produces a counterintuitive outcome where the statically superior conductor suffers a marked relative impedance increase, whereas the poorer conductor remains unaffected, challenging common student expectations and catalyzing cognitive activation. Depending on the instructional setting, the approach can be implemented either as a quick lecture demonstration or as a quantitative experiment within an undergraduate laboratory course.2026-09-03T18:00:38ZFlorian PlattenHelmut Wenzhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02432v1Student responses to a modified Force Concept Inventory: The Newtonian Mechanics Quiz2026-09-02T10:54:24ZEven in the era of modern physics, understanding and applying Newton's classical Laws of Motion are key skills for physicists and form a core component of instructional programmes. Students arrive in the classroom with intuitive ideas about force and motion that are often misaligned with Newtonian thinking. Prior research has shown that these incorrect intuitive ideas are remarkably persistent, and can stay with students throughout their education and beyond. Reliable instruments, that can accurately evaluate student understanding of Newtonian mechanics, are required to track student progress and evaluate the efficacy of instructional programmes. The Force Concept Inventory (FCI), a conceptual quiz composed of multiple-choice questions, is a well-established instrument, developed to address these challenges. The FCI, and how students respond to its questions, has been widely investigated and discussed in the literature. Notably, research has shown that: correct responses to questions do not always correspond to correct application of Newtonian concepts; and the limited response options given for multiple-choice questions often do not capture the full range of student thinking. There is therefore a burgeoning need to develop new instruments that probe students' understanding at a deeper level, by interrogating conceptual understanding from multiple perspectives and incorporating different question formats that require students to construct and consider their responses. We introduce the Newtonian Mechanics Quiz (NMQ), a modified version of the FCI that incorporates follow-up questions in a variety of formats, each with different diagnostic functions. This article describes the development and validation of the NMQ instrument, and illustrates several novel analyses enabled by the student response dataset that can offer deep insight into students' conceptual understanding of Newton's Laws.2026-09-02T10:54:24Z19 pages, 9 figures, articleAshutosh Kumar PathakMark A. J. ParkerAndrew J. A. JamesSally E. JordanJonathan Nylkhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01477v1What do student responses to the car-truck problems tell us? An investigation into two Force Concept Inventory questions2026-09-01T16:14:45ZConcept inventories are widely used in Physics Education Research to uncover student misconceptions and measure the effectiveness of instruction. Two questions in the widely used multiple-choice Force Concept Inventory concern a car that is pushing a truck, as the car is accelerating and then when a steady speed has been reached. We investigate the premise that correct answering of these questions is because of good conceptual understanding of Newton's Third Law, by analyzing responses to a modified inventory that randomly offers students multiple-choice or free-text versions of the questions and follows these with questions in which students select the physical principle(s) they used. The results from 674 attempts from students at six universities show a similar pattern of results for multiple-choice and free-text versions, also comparable with Force Concept Inventory results from one of the universities in the preceding five years, but with marked differences relative to early published Force Concept Inventory data. Free-text responses and the law-selection sub-questions can reveal more about conceptual understanding than can be seen in multiple-choice responses alone. For the accelerating system (Question 15), correct responses are usually attributed to Newton's Third Law and incorrect responses are usually attributed to Newton's Second Law. When speed is constant (Question 16), around 90% of responses are correct, but a significant number of these are attributed to Newton's First Law or the Superposition Principle rather than Newton's Third Law, especially pre-instruction. We conclude that students are confusing balanced forces on a single object moving at constant speed with the correct equal-and-opposite interaction pair between two objects, and correct responses to Question 16 may be concealing an underlying misconception.2026-09-01T16:14:45Z23 pages, 10 figuresAshutosh Kumar PathakMark A. J. ParkerRoss K. GallowayAndrew J. A. JamesSally E. JordanJonathan Nylkhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06479v5From Novice to Expert in Cloud Physics: a Network-Based Analysis of Learner Understanding2026-08-31T13:32:32ZUnderstanding how learners conceptualize complex scientific systems remains a key challenge in geoscience education. We investigate the evolution of conceptual understanding in cloud physics among 153 learners, ranging from bachelor students to disciplinary experts and representing diverse academic backgrounds across STEM. To do so, we trace how knowledge structures differ across levels of experience using metrics from a cross-sectional network analysis. The analysis characterizes the quantitative and qualitative dimensions of the epistemological shift that learners experience as they mature in their understanding of the discipline. We show that in their description of the life-cycle of a cloud, they progressively transition from the general physics of the water cycle to detailed descriptions of cloud micro-physical processes. A triangulation of data sources with a panel of experts complements and confirms the analysis. The results can assist lecturers in structuring their teaching toward higher levels of understanding and enable students to anticipate the key complexities and conceptual challenges in the field during their learning process. Furthermore, the generic nature of the analysis can be transferred to a wide range of disciplines.2024-11-10T14:40:39Z55 pages, 12 figures, 4 supplementary files available on requestJulien-Pooya WeihsVegard GjerdeHelge Drange