https://arxiv.org/api/qVd8ROb4wkF9DlWJr2sUoCQAODs 2026-03-24T08:33:29Z 4506 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11247v4 2026-03-23T16:35:36Z

I present a new "Pairs and Squares" rendering of the Periodic Table. It takes advantage of the number of orbitals at each atomic energy level being a whole square. This makes the table very regular and intuitive in contrast with its currently used presentations.

2025-06-12T19:36:55Z 4 pages, 3 table variations, more references Leonid A. Levin http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20412v1 2026-03-20T18:32:20Z

This study explores how generative artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, can assist in the evaluation of laboratory reports in Experimental Physics. Two interaction modalities were implemented: an automated API-based evaluation and a customized ChatGPT configuration designed to emulate instructor feedback. The analysis focused on two complementary dimensions-formal and structural integrity, and technical accuracy and conceptual depth. Findings indicate that ChatGPT provides consistent feedback on organization, clarity, and adherence to scientific conventions, while its evaluation of technical reasoning and interpretation of experimental data remains less reliable. Each modality exhibited distinctive limitations, particularly in processing graphical and mathematical information. The study contributes to understanding how the use of AI in evaluating laboratory reports can inform feedback practices in experimental physics, highlighting the importance of teacher supervision to ensure the validity of physical reasoning and the accurate interpretation of experimental results.

2026-03-20T18:32:20Z 16 pages, 1 fig Marcos Abreu Álvaro Suárez Cecilia Stari Arturo C. Marti http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17966v1 2026-03-18T17:34:28Z

Despite nation efforts to promote diversity and inclusion, women and gender minorities remain underrepresented in physics. One common approach to studying gender in physics contexts treats gender as a categorical identity variable (e.g. "man," "woman"). In contrast, approaches that center gender expression focus on the nuanced and context-dependent ways in which gender is socially enacted and interpreted. They are therefore well-suited for exploring how gender permeates the small-scale interactions that ultimately shape students' persistence and perceptions of inclusivity. In the present study, we utilized gender expression as a lens to investigate gendered patterns in introductory undergraduate physics students' sense of belonging in the discipline. Specifically, this qualitative investigation expands on our previous quantitative work to investigate why students may feel misperceived by their peers in physics and how that experience influences their belonging. Results indicated that students' sense of belonging may be impacted by perceived pressures to alter their gender expression in physics contexts. Many interviewees expressed a felt need to present themselves more "masculinely" to fit in. Contrastingly, pressure to present "femininely" was most often associated with standing out. Implications for supporting students' authentic self-ex in physics contexts are discussed.

2026-03-18T17:34:28Z Noah Leibnitz Yangqiuting Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16638v1 2026-03-17T15:11:22Z

The aim of this study is to investigate the decisions and reasoning of undergraduate students when choosing simple measurement instruments in an introductory physics laboratory course. For this study, we have developed a questionnaire and implemented it in a pre-/post-test manner to analyze the influence of lab instruction on both students' decisions and reasoning. To characterize students' justifications, we have inductively developed a coding manual that captures the nuances of students' reasoning when choosing an instrument. It shows that students consider different aspects for their decisions, such as data quality, practical and personal considerations. We have also found that laboratory instruction influenced both students' decisions and justifications, leading to a stronger emphasis on data quality. In fact, after instruction, the majority of students choose the instrument with lower uncertainty and base their justifications mainly on the aim of reducing uncertainties, avoiding systematic effects or mistakes in the instrument reading, and less often than before instruction on personal experience and intuition. These findings suggest that dedicating specific laboratory instruction sessions on measurements and data quality, and having students choose between different instrumentation and provide a justification for their decision, can positively impact students' habits in the laboratory and encourage them to base their choices on evidence rather than intuition.

2026-03-17T15:11:22Z 15 pages, 4 figures Micol Alemani Karel Kok Eva Philippaki http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12127v2 2026-03-17T06:16:16Z

The Bernstein-Vazirani (BV) algorithm is frequently taught as a canonical example of quantum parallelism, yet the standard interference-based explanation often obscures its underlying simplicity. We present a geometric reframing in which the Hadamard gate "wrapping" acts as a global basis rotation rather than a generator of computational complexity. This perspective reveals that the algorithm is effectively a classical linear computation over GF(2) performed in the conjugate Fourier basis, with the apparent parallelism arising from coordinate transformation. Building on Mermin's earlier pedagogical shortcut, which presented a 'classical' circuit equivalent but stopped short of explicitly labeling it as such, we elevate this to a formal geometric framework. In the extension, we distinguish between globally rotated circuits -- which we reveal as classical linear computations -- and topologically twisted circuits that generate quantum entanglement. We introduce a pedagogical taxonomy distinguishing (1) pure computational-basis circuits, (2) globally rotated circuits (exemplified by Bernstein-Vazirani), and (3) topologically twisted circuits involving non-aligned subsystem bases. This framework allows viewing the Gottesman-Knill theorem from a new angle, extends students' understanding of phase kickback and the 'Ricochet Property'. Furthermore, it provides a more intuitive starting point for explaining Bell-pair extensions through concrete circuit derivations and Qiskit simulations suitable for undergraduate quantum information courses. The outlook explores how this geometric view paves the way for understanding entanglement as topological twists.

2026-03-12T16:29:39Z 28 pages, 11 figures. Includes Qiskit circuit simulations in Appendix and an ancillary Jupyter Notebook Bartosz Chmura http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15056v1 2026-03-16T10:07:59Z

We present a low-cost experimental setup to measure the Boltzmann constant (kB) and the elementary charge (e) through thermal and shot noise, achieving relative accuracies of up to 1%. The system utilizes a cost-effective ADC module integrated with a carefully selected low-noise audio operational amplifier, resulting in a simple and compact circuit design that better satisfies experimental requirements. Furthermore, the approach employs a dual-channel sampling method to measure cross-correlation noise, thereby significantly reducing the uncorrelated background noise of the device and improving the signal-to-noise ratio. The noise measurement methodology offers an intuitive demonstration of microscopic fluctuations, making it a valuable teaching tool. In addition, the experimental setup employs standard electronic components, is low cost and robust, making it well-suited for widespread adoption in university and even high school laboratories.

2026-03-16T10:07:59Z Zitong Peng Jie Zheng Xiaokai Yue http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14888v1 2026-03-16T06:38:36Z

We present a fully reproducible demonstration of an AI-assisted scientific workflow designed for a broad physics, mathematics, and computer-science readership. The initial project artifact stack was generated from one single user prompt and then reviewed and curated for submission by the human author. Rather than claiming a new scientific discovery, the manuscript uses canonical benchmark problems with exact, manufactured, or independently checkable answers. The analytical component starts from the one-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator, derives its dimensionless form, and validates finite-difference eigenpairs against exact Hermite-function benchmarks. The numerical partial-differential-equation component solves a heat equation with a known modal solution and a Poisson problem verified by a manufactured solution, with explicit convergence studies. The inverse-modeling component fits synthetic damped-oscillation data by nonlinear least squares and quantifies parametric uncertainty by bootstrap resampling. The computational-science component compares dense and sparse eigensolvers and contrasts direct and iterative sparse linear solvers, with careful interpretation of machine-dependent timing data. Taken together, the results show that contemporary AI can already serve as a useful scientific copilot for derivation, implementation, validation, visualization, and manuscript preparation, provided that each stage is constrained by benchmark theory, explicit verification, and transparent artifacts. The demonstration is therefore relevant not because the underlying science is novel, but because it offers a concrete template for trustworthy AI use in technical research practice.

2026-03-16T06:38:36Z 10 pages, 5 figures Kin Hung Fung http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14732v1 2026-03-16T02:09:06Z

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly considered for automated assessment and feedback, understanding when LLM marking can be trusted is essential. We evaluate LLM-as-a-judge marking across three physics assessment formats - structured questions, written essays, and scientific plots - comparing GPT-5.2, Grok 4.1, Claude Opus 4.5, DeepSeek-V3.2, Gemini Pro 3, and committee aggregations against human markers under blind, solution-provided, false-solution, and exemplar-anchored conditions. For $n=771$ blind university exam questions, models achieve fractional mean absolute errors (fMAE) $\approx 0.22$ with robust discriminative validity (Spearman $ρ> 0.6$). For secondary and university structured questions ($n=1151$), providing official solutions reduces MAE and strengthens validity (committee $ρ= 0.88$); false solutions degrade absolute accuracy but leave rank ordering largely intact (committee $ρ= 0.77$; individual models $ρ\geq 0.59$). Essay marking behaves fundamentally differently. Across $n=55$ scripts ($n=275$ essays), blind AI marking is harsher and more variable than human marking, with discriminative validity already poor ($ρ\approx 0.1$). Adding a mark scheme does not improve discrimination ($ρ\approx 0$; all confidence intervals include zero). Anchored exemplars shift the AI mean close to the human mean and compress variance below the human standard deviation, but discriminative validity remains near-zero - distributional agreement can occur without valid discrimination. For code-based plot elements ($n=1400$), models achieve exceptionally high discriminative validity ($ρ> 0.84$) with near-linear calibration. Across all task types, validity tracks criterion-referenceability - the extent to which a task maps to explicit, observable grading features - and benchmark reliability, rather than raw model capability.

2026-03-16T02:09:06Z 25 pages, 26 figures Will Yeadon Tom Hardy Paul Mackay Elise Agra http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14652v1 2026-03-15T23:13:48Z

This research uses 10 years of institutional data at a large public university in the USA to investigate trends in the undergraduate majors students declare, drop, and earn degrees, especially comparing physics to other disciplines. We find that physics has the lowest number of students of all science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines and it also has the highest rates of attrition of students who declare a major. While many STEM disciplines have students migrating both in and out of those majors, physics primarily has a uni-directional migration of students out of the major. Furthermore, physics has the lowest percentage of women undergraduate majors. Using an equity framework, we view these findings as signatures of inequitable and non-inclusive culture. We suggest that important roles may be played by stereotypes such as the incorrect belief that physics is accessible only to brilliant men, the issue of first-year college physics courses failing to energize students, and apathy in large physics departments toward improving intentional recruitment and retention of physics majors.

2026-03-15T23:13:48Z Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice; West Palm Beach Vol. 22, Iss. 17, (2022): 63-81 Kyle M. Whitcomb Danny Doucette Chandralekha Singh http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14335v1 2026-03-15T11:58:17Z

Over the past several decades, a large body of research has shown that undergraduate science students learn more and more equitably in classrooms that are not entirely lecture-based. Non-lecture activities are collectively referred to as ``active learning;" however, this term lacks definition and little research has examined which types and combinations of active learning strategies are most effective. In this study, we use a dataset that includes more than 10,000 students and spans a range of scientific disciplines, institutions, and instructors to create a predictive model that maps time spent on different classroom activities to student conceptual learning. We find that four variables -- classroom time spent on lecture, group worksheets, clicker questions, and student questions -- are sufficient to reliably predict student learning, as measured by concept inventory scores. We identify two types of classes that consistently lead to exceptional student learning gains (effect sizes greater than 2). The first are classes that spend 10-20\% of class time on group worksheets, 20-40\% of class time on group clicker questions, and average two or more student questions per hour of class time. The second is classes spending 30\% or more of class time on group worksheets. We also find that classes which do not include any group worksheets consistently have learning outcomes comparable to fully lecture classes, even when other active learning strategies are used. These results provide testable recommendations for future controlled studies to investigate effective active learning implementation.

2026-03-15T11:58:17Z 9 pages, 5 figures Olive Ross Meagan Sundstrom N. G. Holmes http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13512v1 2026-03-13T18:44:34Z

Internal waves, or waves that propagate within a stratified fluid, may break and cause mixing. While each individual mixing event may be small, collectively, internal wave breaking drive processes in the ocean that are critical to understanding the maritime climate and biosphere. In this paper we show how to set up an experiment, suitable for an undergraduate-level lab, that illustrates a common generation and breaking mechanism in the ocean. In particular, we show how the process changes in response to a non dimensional parameter, the buoyancy Reynolds number, that can be easily varied. This parameter highlights the role of viscous vs. inertial/buoyancy forces. We outline our methods of creating a linear stratification, injecting energy with a forced topography, and analyzing the resulting dynamics with Background Oriented Schlieren and energy spectra from a conductivity probe. By altering our forcing to accommodate three values of the buoyancy Reynolds, three distinct internal wave regimes can be observed: no turbulence, slight turbulence, and extreme turbulence. Our methods aim to increase the accessibility to studying these internal waves in future experimental work, ocean modeling, and math and physics undergraduate learning.

2026-03-13T18:44:34Z Vohn Jacquez Zachary Phan Zachary Taebel Dylan Brunei Pierre-Yves Passaggia Alberto Scotti http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13451v1 2026-03-13T15:24:21Z

Ultralight dark matter is a hypothetical class of particle with a number of interesting theoretical and experimental properties, many of which are best understood by direct analogy with or application of undergraduate physics. We present a series of exercises and discussions which may inspire the reader to bring contemporary research on ultralight dark matter into the undergraduate classroom.

2026-03-13T15:24:21Z 4 pages, 1 figure, plus solutions and references. Submitted to Am. J. Phys. for a special issue on motivating physics learning through research applications Timothy D. Wiser http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12158v1 2026-03-12T16:55:00Z

Computational physics is a key part of what it means to do physics in the twenty-first century. However, upper division computational physics remains a largely understudied area. We set out to understand the experiences of students in an upper division computational physics lab course. To that end we conducted semi-structured interviews with five students at the end of their second of three terms in the course sequence. We then analyzed these interviews utilizing the emerging framework of Physics Computational Literacy. We found that the way students express how they learn computational physics implies they are making tradeoffs between their development of the different aspects of computational literacy. Additionally, we found that how students approach developing social computational literacy varies across individuals, and is driven by unspoken assumptions.

2026-03-12T16:55:00Z 2025 PERC Proceedings [Washington, DC, August 6-7, 2025], edited by A. Pawl, J. P. Zwolak, and A. E. Leak Luke Nearhood Patti Hamerski 10.1119/perc.2025.pr.Nearhood http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12154v1 2026-03-12T16:52:22Z

Generative Artificial Intelligence (gen-AI) is rapidly becoming more integrated into today's classrooms in all ranges of education. In higher education, Gen-AI is often seen as a resource for students, aiding them in drafting outlines, solving simple mathematical problems, or even decoding or constructing code. In this paper, we analyze essay-based interviews (N=6) from an upper-division computational physics course, in which physics majors addressed their views and attitudes towards Gen-AI and how it affects their learning. We analyzed the concepts of creativity and gen-AI using the Four C Model, a framework encompassing four types of creativity. Our analysis of the data involved coding and characterizing students' definitions of creativity and generative AI. Our findings revealed two main observations: first, students conceptualized their creativity primarily within mini-c and little-c; second, students perceived gen-AI as a resource and learning tool but expressed skepticism regarding its accuracy and creativity.

2026-03-12T16:52:22Z 2024 PERC Proceedings [Boston, MA, July 10-11, 2024], edited by Q. X. Ryan, A. Pawl, and J. P. Zwolak Pachi Her Patti Hamerski 10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Her http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10959v1 2026-03-11T16:47:32Z

According to the literature, mobile devices as experimental tools (MDET) can offer educational benefits by creating authentic, real-life contexts for physics learning, enhancing student motivation through the use of familiar technology, and supporting cognitive processes by providing multiple representations of phenomena. However, concerns have been raised about potential distractions and cognitive overload. Regarding these conflicting perspectives, few empirical studies on the impact of MDET in real classroom settings of regular, full-length physics courses are available, focusing on a non-specialized high-school target group. We present a study of a mechanics course in such a new setting, addressing the tight curricular, material, and practical constraints inherent to it. A quasi experimental pre post design comparing a treatment group using MDET and a control group without (same content, lesson plan, and teachers) was used. The 19-week teaching sequence focused on conceptual learning and motivational outcomes, controlled by several predictor variables. Findings reveal substantial pre post learning gains for both groups (Cohen d = 0.9) and small gains for perceived relation to reality (d = 0.29). But no significant differences between treatments were found, indicating that MDET do not outperform conventional teaching under the given constraints. Moreover, no evidence of negative effects such as distraction or cognitive overload was observed, and little to no interactions with predictors such as gender or prior knowledge were found. In conclusion, MDET show considerable potential as an effective option for integrating technology into teaching, offering learning outcomes comparable to those of successful conventional teaching, but not better.

2026-03-11T16:47:32Z 32 pages, 5 figures, 10 tables Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 22, 010129 (2026) Alice Gasparini Florian Stern Marine Delaval Andreas Müller 10.1103/96gp-gqvj