https://arxiv.org/api//a89PcFS/b0/XR/4F1Ufew/dUhs 2026-04-21T08:49:18Z 8758 705 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04210v3 2025-04-02T16:42:25Z

The FCC-ee offers the potential to measure the electron Yukawa coupling via direct s-channel Higgs production, $e^+ e^- \rightarrow \text{H}$, at a centre-of-mass (CM) energy of ~125 GeV. This measurement is significantly facilitated if the CM energy spread of $e^+ e^-$ collisions can be reduced to a level comparable to the natural width of the Higgs boson, $Γ_{\text{H}}$ = 4.1 MeV, without substantial loss in luminosity. Achieving this reduction in collision-energy spread is possible through the "monochromatization" concept. The basic idea is to create opposite correlations between spatial position and energy deviation within the colliding beams, which can be accomplished in beam optics by introducing a nonzero dispersion function with opposite signs for the two beams at the interaction point. Since the first proposal in 2016, the implementation of monochromatization at the FCC-ee has been continuously improved, starting from preliminary parametric studies. In this paper, we present a detailed study of the interaction region optics design for this newly proposed collision mode, exploring different potential configurations and their implementation in the FCC-ee global lattice, along with beam dynamics simulations and performance evaluations including the impact of "beamstrahlung."

2024-11-06T19:12:15Z Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A 1073 (2025) 170268 Z. Zhang A. Faus-Golfe A. Korsun B. Bai H. Jiang K. Oide P. Raimondi D. d'Enterria S. Zhang Z. Zhou Y. Chi F. Zimmermann 10.1016/j.nima.2025.170268 http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01867v1 2025-04-02T16:21:07Z

The standard approach in the conventional theory of intrabeam scattering (IBS) is based on the analysis of binary Coulomb collisions of charged particles in the beam. This picture is only partially true: in reality, a given particle collides simultaneously with many partners and a more rigorous treatment should take this collective aspect of the collisions into account. A framework for such treatment has been known in plasma physics since beginning of the 1960s. In this work, we will show how it can be applied to IBS in relativistic beams for a particular problem of the growth of the beam energy spread. A preliminary conclusion of this work is that the conventional IBS theory might underestimate the effects of long-range correlations in Coulomb collisions in the beam.

2025-04-02T16:21:07Z Gennady Stupakov http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05651v2 2025-04-02T08:56:30Z

We propose a laser-based method for the preparation of high-energy polarized electrons, from the ionization of isolated spin-polarized hydrogen (SPH) atoms. The SPH atoms are prepared from the photodissociation of HCl, using two consecutive UV pulses of ps duration. By appropriately timing and focusing the pulses, we can spatially separate the highly polarized SPH from other unwanted photoproducts, which then act as the target for the acceleration lasers. We show how elastic collisions define number density $n$ and polarization P regimes ($10^{16}\leq$ $n$ $\leq 10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$, 0.99 $\geq$ P $\geq$ 0.40) for the pre-polarized targets, and use particle-in-cell simulations to demonstrate the method's feasibility.

2024-03-08T19:45:56Z Dimitris Sofikitis Lars Reichwein Marios G. Stamatakis Christos Zois Dimitrios G. Papazoglou Samuel Cohen Markus Büscher Alexander Pukhov T. Peter Rakitzis http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01434v1 2025-04-02T07:35:27Z

Advanced and novel accelerators (ANAs), driven a by laser pulse or a relativistic particle bunch, have made remarkable progress over the last decades. They accelerated electrons by 10GeV in 30cm (laser driven) and by 42GeV in 85cm (particle bunch driven). Rapid progress continues with lasers, plasma sources, computational methods, and more. In this document we highlight the main contributions made by the various major collaborations, facilities, and experiments that develop ANAs for applications to particle and high-energy physics. These include: ALiVE, ANL-AWA, AWAKE, BNL-ATF, CEPC Injector, DESY-KALDERA, ELI ERIC, EuPRAXIA, HALHF, LBNL-BELLA, LBNL-kBELLA, LCvison, PETRA IV Injector, 10TeV Collider design, SLAC-FACET II, as well as the development of structures, lasers and plasma sources, and sustainability, and demonstrate the intense activities in the field. ANAs can have, and already have, applications to particle and high-energy physics as subsystems, the so-called intermediate applications: injectors, lower energy experiments, beam dump experiments, test beds for detectors, etc. Additionally, an ANA could be an upgrade for any Higgs factory based on a linear accelerator, as proposed in the LCvison project. ANAs have advantages over other concepts for reaching multi-TeV energies: lower geographical and environmental footprints, higher luminosity to power ratio, and are thus more sustainable than other accelerators. However, ANAs must still meet a number of challenges before they can produce bunches with parameters and the luminosity required for a linear collider at the energy frontier. It is therefore extremely important to strongly support vigorous R&D of ANAs, because they are, at this time, the most sustainable acceleration scheme to reach very high energies with a linear accelerator.

2025-04-02T07:35:27Z 20 pages, no figures, input ESPP Update 2025 B. Cros P. Muggli L. Corner J. Farmer M. Ferarrio S. Gessner L. Gizzi E. Gschwendtner M. Hogan S. Hooker W. Leemans C. Lindstrøm J. List A. Maier J. Osterhoff P. Piot J. Power I. Pogorelsky M. Turner J. -L. Vay J. Wood http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01391v1 2025-04-02T06:11:59Z

High-power, continuously tunable narrowband terahertz (THz) sources are essential for advancing nonlinear optics, THz-driven material dynamics, and ultrafast spectroscopy. Conventional techniques typically impose a trade-off between pulse energy and frequency tunability. Here, we introduce a novel free-electron laser approach that overcomes these limitations by pre-modulating a relativistic electron beam with a frequency-beating laser pulse and leveraging bunch compression along with collective effects to enhance microbunching. Experimental results demonstrate that this technique generates narrowband THz emission with continuous frequency tunability from 7.8 to 30.8THz, achieving pulse energies up to 385μJ while maintaining spectral bandwidths between 7.7% and 14.7%. Moreover, the method exhibits exceptional robustness and scalability, highlighting its unique ability to bridge the long-standing THz gap and offering a promising solution for diverse cutting-edge scientific applications.

2025-04-02T06:11:59Z Yin Kang Tong Li Zhen Wang Yue Wang Cheng Yu Weiyi Yin Zhangfeng Gao Hanghua Xu Hang Luo Xiaofan Wang Jian Chen Taihe Lan Xiaoqing Liu Jinguo Wang Huan Zhao Fei Gao Liping Sun YanYan Zhu Yongmei Wen Qili Tian Chenye Xu Xingtao Wang Jiaqiang Xu Zheng Qi Tao Liu Bin Li Lixin Yan Kaiqing Zhang Chao Feng Bo Liu Zhentang Zhao http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.10601v4 2025-04-01T22:50:11Z

Superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) niobium cavities are critical for modern particle accelerators, as well as for advancing superconducting quantum systems and enabling ultra-sensitive searches for new physics. In this work, we report a systematic observation of an anomalous frequency dip in Nb cavities, which occurs at temperatures just below the critical temperature ($T_\mathrm{c}$), indicative of enhanced superconducting properties at $T \ll T_c$. The magnitude of this dip is strongly correlated with the RF surface resistance, impurity distribution near the surface, and $T_\mathrm{c}$. Additionally, we report measurements of the coherence peak in the AC conductivity of two Nb SRF cavities processed using distinct methods. By comparing recent theories developed to model this experimental data, we show that the frequency dip feature, larger coherence peak height, and reduction in the temperature-dependent surface resistance with RF current occur at minimal but finite levels of disorder.

2021-03-19T02:43:57Z 8 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables D. Bafia Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory A. Grassellino Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory M. Checchin SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory J. F. Zasadzinski Illinois Institute of Technology A. Romanenko Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.054052 http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14898v4 2025-04-01T19:23:49Z

Radioactive ion beams (RIB) are a key focus of current research in nuclear physics. Already long ago it was proposed that they could have applications in cancer therapy. In fact, while charged particle therapy is potentially the most effective radiotherapy technique available, it is highly susceptible to uncertainties in the beam range. RIB are well-suited for image-guided particle therapy, as isotopes that undergo \b{eta}+-decay can be precisely visualized using positron emission tomography (PET), enabling accurate real-time monitoring of the beam range. We successfully treated a mouse osteosarcoma using a radioactive 11C-ion beam. The tumor was located in the neck, in close proximity to the spinal cord, increasing the risk of radiation-induced myelopathy from even slight variations in the beam range caused by anatomical changes or incorrect calibration of the planning CT. We managed to completely control the tumor with the highest dose while minimizing toxicity. Low-grade neurological side effects were correlated to the positron activity measured in the spine. The biological washout of the activity from the tumor volume was dependent on the dose, indicating a potential component of vascular damage at high doses. This experiment marks the first instance of tumor treatment using RIB and paves the way for future clinical applications.

2024-09-23T10:48:01Z 56 pages, 13 figures, supplements. Video supplements available on request Daria Boscolo Giulio Lovatti Olga Sokol Tamara Vitacchio Francesco Evangelista Emma Haettner Walter Tinganelli Christian Graeff Uli Weber Christoph Schuy Munetaka Nitta Martina Moglioni Daria Kostyleva Sivaji Purushothaman Peter G. Thirolf Jonathan Bortfeldt Christoph Scheidenberger Katia Parodi Marco Durante 10.1038/s41567-025-02993-8 http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00577v1 2025-04-01T09:32:28Z

The Advanced Wakefield Experiment, AWAKE, is a well-established international collaboration and aims to develop the proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration of electron bunches to energies and qualities suitable for first particle physics applications, such as strong-field QED and fixed target experiments ($\sim$50-200GeV). Numerical simulations show that these energies can be reached with an average accelerating gradient of $\sim1$GeV/m in a single proton-driven plasma wakefield stage. This is enabled by the high energy per particle and per bunch of the CERN SPS 19kJ, 400GeV and LHC ($\sim$120kJ, 7TeV) proton bunches. Bunches produced by synchrotrons are long, and AWAKE takes advantage of the self-modulation process to drive wakefields with GV/m amplitude. By the end of 2025, all physics concepts related to self-modulation will have been experimentally established as part of the AWAKE ongoing program that started in 2016. Key achievements include: direct observation of self-modulation, stabilization and control by two seeding methods, acceleration of externally injected electrons from 19MeV to more than 2GeV, and sustained high wakefield amplitudes beyond self-modulation saturation using a plasma density step. In addition to a brief summary of achievements reached so far, this document outlines the AWAKE roadmap as a demonstrator facility for producing beams with quality sufficient for first applications. The plan includes: 1) Accelerating a quality-controlled electron bunch to multi-GeV energies in a 10m plasma by 2031; 2) Demonstrating scalability to even higher energies by LS4. Synergies of the R&D performed in AWAKE that are relevant for advancing plasma wakefield acceleration in general are highlighted. We argue that AWAKE and similar advanced accelerator R&D be strongly supported by the European Strategy for Particle Physics Update.

2025-04-01T09:32:28Z 10 pages, 5 figures, Input to the European Strategy for Particle Physics Update on behalf of the AWAKE Collaboration E. Gschwendtner P. Muggli M. Turner AWAKE Collaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21185v3 2025-04-01T05:50:29Z

The Muon Collider, proposed under the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC), represents a groundbreaking advancement in circular collider technology. By using muons instead of protons or electrons, this collider has the potential of unprecedented discovery reach, luminosity, and compact design, significantly increasing energy efficiency, reducing environmental impact and improving sustainability. However, achieving this vision necessitates overcoming unique and extreme challenges in superconducting magnet technology. This document summarizes the state of the art, challenges, and the proposed R&D roadmap for developing the next generation of superconducting magnet systems crucial for the Muon Collider over the next ten years. The goal is to advance accelerator magnet technology beyond current limits, with a special focus on High-Temperature Superconductors (HTS) materials for high-field and high-temperature applications. This note is a concise summary of the extensive proposal [BOT-2025] which we refer to for detailed referencing and as supporting material. We focus here on the technology gap to be filled by the proposed R&D, the structure and objectives of the proposed R&D, and provide the resource estimate for the next ten years.

2025-03-27T06:07:48Z L. Bottura B. Auchmann F. Boattini B. Bordini B. Caiffi L. Cooley S. Fabbri S. Gourlay S. Mariotto T. Nakamoto S. Prestemon M. Statera http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20214v2 2025-03-31T19:05:46Z

This document outlines a community-driven Design Study for a 10 TeV pCM Wakefield Accelerator Collider. The 2020 ESPP Report emphasized the need for Advanced Accelerator R\&D, and the 2023 P5 Report calls for the ``delivery of an end-to-end design concept, including cost scales, with self-consistent parameters throughout." This Design Study leverages recent experimental and theoretical progress resulting from a global R\&D program in order to deliver a unified, 10 TeV Wakefield Collider concept. Wakefield Accelerators provide ultra-high accelerating gradients which enables an upgrade path that will extend the reach of Linear Colliders beyond the electroweak scale. Here, we describe the organization of the Design Study including timeline and deliverables, and we detail the requirements and challenges on the path to a 10 TeV Wakefield Collider.

2025-03-26T04:17:46Z Contribution prepared for the 2025 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics Spencer Gessner Jens Osterhoff Carl A. Lindstrøm Kevin Cassou Simone Pagan Griso Jenny List Erik Adli Brian Foster John Palastro Elena Donegani Moses Chung Mikhail Polyanskiy Lindsey Gray Igor Pogorelsky Gongxiaohui Chen Gianluca Sarri Brian Beaudoin Ferdinand Willeke David Bruhwiler Joseph Grames Yuan Shi Robert Szafron Angira Rastogi Alexander Knetsch Xueying Lu Douglas Storey Thomas Grismayer Michael Ehrlichman Maksim Kravchenko Christiane Scherb Vasyl Maslov Claudio Emma Daniel Kalvik Ivan Rajkovic Jean-Luc Vay Michael Peskin Tong Zhou Jeroen van Tilborg Patrick Meade Mario Galletti Carlo Benedetti Stewart Boogert Timothy Barklow Antonino Di Piazza Chaojie Zhang Yiheng Ye Stepan Bulanov Pratik Manwani Eric Esarey Cameron Geddes Livio Verra Laura Corner Oznur Apsimon Vera Cilento Allen Caldwell Rachel Margraf-O'Neal Qianqian Su Michael Litos Gerard Andonian Mark Hogan Carl Schroeder Kei Nakamura Jonathan Wood Anthony Vazquez Keegan Downham Davide Terzani Alexander Ody Sarah Schroeder Arianna Formenti Ulascan Sarica Thamine Dalichaouch Patric Muggli Rob Shalloo Francesco Massimo Alessandro Cianchi Jorge Vieira Felipe Peña Chunguang Jing Francesco Filippi Pierre Drobniak Dillon Merenich Mariastefania De Vido Massimo Ferrario Robert Ariniello Andrei Seryi Weishuang Linda Xu Gemma Costa Jian Bin Ben Chen Lewis Kennedy Brendan O'Shea Kevin Langhoff Ole Gunnar Finnerud Nathan Majernik Lewis Boulton Dimitrios Ntounis Ankur Dhar Thomas Schörner Angelo Biagioni Ariel Schwartzman Kyoungchul Kong Roman Pöschl Sophia Morton Gwanghui Ha Samuel Homiller John Farmer Csaba Balazs Jie Gao River Robles Emilio Nanni Graham Wilson Rogelio Tomas Garcia Bluemlein Johannes Juergen Reuter Angeles Faus Golfe Dirk Zerwas Jan Kalinowski Jonas Björklund Svensson Ivanka Bozovic Mohammad Mahdi Altakach Marco Garten Johannes Braathen Francesco Giovanni Celiberto Carolina Amoedo Richard D'Arcy Edda Gschwendtner Joshua Gregory Pavel Karataev Patrick Koppenburg Leonhard Reichenbach Jan Pucek Matthew Wing Eduardo Granados Nigel Watson Tom Tong Ivo Schulthess Maria Enrica Biagini Hossein Saberi Jan Klamka Guoxing Xia Lars Reichwein Kyrre Ness Sjobak Andrea Renato Rossi Steffen Doebert Alban Sublet Samuel Norman Navid Vafaei-Najafabadi Ans Pardons Jonathan Bagger Paul Grannis Dongxing He Keisho Hidaka Alexander Pukhov Eugene Bulyak Leily Kiani Naveen Pathak William Li Pouya Asadi Anthony Gonsalves Eir Eline Hørlyk Fanting Kong Lance Labun Mahek Logantha Ken Marsh Michele Bergamaschi Marcel Demarteau Mikael Berggren Maximilian Swiatlowski Eleni Vryonidou Oksana Chubenko Philippe Piot Katherine Fraser Siddharth Karkare Brigitte Cros Armando Valter Felicio Zuffi Nicole Hartman Aishik Ghosh Nelson Lopes Jaron Shrock Caterina Vernieri Tor Raubenheimer Marlene Turner Katharine Leney David Cooke Louis Forrester Thandikire Madula Anna Giribono Ou Labun Sebastien Corde Remi Lehe Noe Gonzalez Max Varverakis Matthias Fuchs Maxence Thevenet Sharon Perez Simon Knapen Aodhan McIlvenny Valentina Lee Claire Hansel Severin Diederichs Alexander Scheinker Rafi Hessami http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21179v2 2025-03-31T09:43:12Z

A proton-driven Muon Collider, in the configuration that has resulted from the efforts of the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC), poses multiple and exceptional magnet system challenges. Addressing these challenges will require a focused effort to advance accelerator magnet technology well beyond the present state of the art, including activities that have not previously been supported by High Energy Physics (HEP) programs, but are synergic with them. This proposal presents the motivation for a directed effort focusing on the development and testing of small- and full-scale magnet prototypes, ultimately culminating in their validation under collider-relevant conditions. This document summarizes technology status, challenges, and development targets, and outlines a detailed plan with staged milestones to advance the technological readiness of magnet systems, bringing the realization of the Muon Collider closer to reality. The total resources to achieve this goal are estimated at 82.5 MCHF and 414 FTE y over ten years, of which 39 MCHF and 199 FTE y are engaged over the first five years. Reaching the desired performance with sustainable technology will depend greatly on exploiting the potential of High Temperature Superconductors (HTS). Mainly because of this, the R&D proposed here has significant potential to broadly impact HEP and its other circular collider considerations such as the FCC-hh, as well as other fields of scientific and societal application, e.g. science in high magnetic fields, NMR and MRI, fusion and other power and mobility applications.

2025-03-27T06:02:46Z L. Bottura B. Auchmann F. Boattini B. Bordini B. Caiffi L. Cooley S. Fabbri S. Gourlay S. Mariotto T. Nakamoto S. Prestemon M. Statera http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23744v1 2025-03-31T05:47:29Z

The Proton Improvement Plan (PIP-II) to the FNAL accelerator chain and the Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) will provide the world's most intense neutrino beam to the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) enabling a wide-ranging physics program. This document outlines the significant contributions made by European national laboratories and institutes towards realizing the first phase of the project with a 1.2 MW neutrino beam. Construction of this first phase is well underway. For DUNE Phase II, this will be closely followed by an upgrade of the beam power to > 2 MW, for which the European groups again have a key role and which will require the continued support of the European community for machine aspects of neutrino physics. Beyond the neutrino beam aspects, LBNF is also responsible for providing unique infrastructure to install and operate the DUNE neutrino detectors at FNAL and at the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF). The cryostats for the first two Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber detector modules at SURF, a contribution of CERN to LBNF, are central to the success of the ongoing execution of DUNE Phase I. Likewise, successful and timely procurement of cryostats for two additional detector modules at SURF will be critical to the success of DUNE Phase II and the overall physics program. The DUNE Collaboration is submitting four main contributions to the 2026 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics process. This paper is being submitted to the 'Accelerator technologies' and 'Projects and Large Experiments' streams. Additional inputs related to the DUNE science program, DUNE detector technologies and R&D, and DUNE software and computing, are also being submitted to other streams.

2025-03-31T05:47:29Z Submitted to the 2026 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics DUNE Collaboration A. Abed Abud R. Acciarri M. A. Acero M. R. Adames G. Adamov M. Adamowski D. Adams M. Adinolfi C. Adriano A. Aduszkiewicz J. Aguilar F. Akbar F. Alemanno N. S. Alex K. Allison M. Alrashed A. Alton R. Alvarez T. Alves A. Aman H. Amar P. Amedo J. Anderson D. A. Andrade C. Andreopoulos M. Andreotti M. P. Andrews F. Andrianala S. Andringa F. Anjarazafy D. Antic M. Antoniassi M. Antonova A. Aranda-Fernandez L. Arellano E. Arrieta Diaz M. A. Arroyave J. Asaadi M. Ascencio A. Ashkenazi D. Asner L. Asquith E. Atkin D. Auguste A. Aurisano V. Aushev D. Autiero D. Ávila Gómez M. B. Azam F. Azfar A. Back H. Back J. J. Back I. Bagaturia L. Bagby D. Baigarashev S. Balasubramanian A. Balboni P. Baldi W. Baldini J. Baldonedo B. Baller B. Bambah R. Banerjee F. Barao D. Barbu G. Barenboim P. Barham Alzás G. J. Barker W. Barkhouse G. Barr J. Barranco Monarca A. Barros N. Barros D. Barrow J. L. Barrow A. Basharina-Freshville A. Bashyal V. Basque D. Basu C. Batchelor L. Bathe-Peters J. B. R. Battat F. Battisti F. Bay M. C. Q. Bazetto J. L. L. Bazo Alba J. F. Beacom E. Bechetoille B. Behera E. Belchior B. Bell G. Bell L. Bellantoni G. Bellettini V. Bellini O. Beltramello C. Benitez Montiel D. Benjamin F. Bento Neves J. Berger S. Berkman J. Bernal P. Bernardini A. Bersani E. Bertolini S. Bertolucci M. Betancourt A. Betancur Rodríguez Y. Bezawada A. T. Bezerra A. Bhat V. Bhatnagar J. Bhatt M. Bhattacharjee M. Bhattacharya S. Bhuller B. Bhuyan S. Biagi J. Bian K. Biery B. Bilki M. Bishai A. Blake F. D. Blaszczyk G. C. Blazey E. Blucher B. Bogart J. Bogenschuetz J. Boissevain S. Bolognesi T. Bolton L. Bomben M. Bonesini C. Bonilla-Diaz A. Booth F. Boran R. Borges Merlo N. Bostan G. Botogoske B. Bottino R. Bouet J. Boza J. Bracinik B. Brahma D. Brailsford F. Bramati A. Branca A. Brandt J. Bremer S. J. Brice V. Brio C. Brizzolari C. Bromberg J. Brooke A. Bross G. Brunetti M. B. Brunetti N. Buchanan H. Budd J. Buergi A. Bundock D. Burgardt S. Butchart G. Caceres V. T. Cai R. Calabrese R. Calabrese J. Calcutt L. Calivers E. Calvo A. Caminata A. F. Camino W. Campanelli A. Campani A. Campos Benitez N. Canci J. Capó I. Caracas D. Caratelli D. Carber J. M. Carceller G. Carini B. Carlus M. F. Carneiro P. Carniti I. Caro Terrazas H. Carranza N. Carrara L. Carroll T. Carroll A. Carter E. Casarejos D. Casazza J. F. Castaño Forero F. A. Castaño A. Castillo C. Castromonte E. Catano-Mur C. Cattadori F. Cavalier F. Cavanna S. Centro G. Cerati C. Cerna A. Cervelli A. Cervera Villanueva J. Chakrani M. Chalifour A. Chappell A. Chatterjee B. Chauhan C. Chavez Barajas H. Chen M. Chen W. C. Chen Y. Chen Z. Chen D. Cherdack S. S. Chhibra C. Chi F. Chiapponi R. Chirco N. Chitirasreemadam K. Cho S. Choate G. Choi D. Chokheli P. S. Chong B. Chowdhury D. Christian M. Chung E. Church M. F. Cicala M. Cicerchia V. Cicero R. Ciolini P. Clarke G. Cline A. G. Cocco J. A. B. Coelho A. Cohen J. Collazo J. Collot J. M. Conrad M. Convery K. Conway S. Copello P. Cova C. Cox L. Cremonesi J. I. Crespo-Anadón M. Crisler E. Cristaldo J. Crnkovic G. Crone R. Cross A. Cudd C. Cuesta Y. Cui F. Curciarello D. Cussans J. Dai O. Dalager W. Dallaway R. D'Amico H. da Motta Z. A. Dar R. Darby L. Da Silva Peres Q. David G. S. Davies S. Davini J. Dawson R. De Aguiar P. De Almeida P. Debbins M. P. Decowski A. de Gouvêa P. C. De Holanda P. De Jong P. Del Amo Sanchez G. De Lauretis A. Delbart D. Delepine M. Delgado A. Dell'Acqua G. Delle Monache N. Delmonte P. De Lurgio R. Demario G. De Matteis J. R. T. de Mello Neto A. P. A. De Mendonca D. M. DeMuth S. Dennis C. Densham P. Denton G. W. Deptuch A. De Roeck V. De Romeri J. P. Detje J. Devine R. Dharmapalan M. Dias A. Diaz J. S. Díaz F. Díaz F. Di Capua A. Di Domenico S. Di Domizio S. Di Falco L. Di Giulio P. Ding L. Di Noto E. Diociaiuti V. Di Silvestre C. Distefano R. Diurba M. Diwan Z. Djurcic S. Dolan M. Dolce F. Dolek M. J. Dolinski D. Domenici S. Donati Y. Donon S. Doran D. Douglas T. A. Doyle F. Drielsma L. Duarte D. Duchesneau K. Duffy K. Dugas P. Dunne B. Dutta H. Duyang D. A. Dwyer A. S. Dyshkant S. Dytman M. Eads A. Earle S. Edayath D. Edmunds J. Eisch W. Emark P. Englezos A. Ereditato T. Erjavec C. O. Escobar J. J. Evans E. Ewart A. C. Ezeribe K. Fahey A. Falcone M. Fani' C. Farnese S. Farrell Y. Farzan J. Felix Y. Feng M. Ferreira da Silva G. Ferry E. Fialova L. Fields P. Filip A. Filkins F. Filthaut G. Fiorillo M. Fiorini S. Fogarty W. Foreman J. Fowler J. Franc K. Francis D. Franco J. Freeman J. Fried A. Friedland M. Fucci S. Fuess I. K. Furic K. Furman A. P. Furmanski R. Gaba A. Gabrielli A. M. Gago F. Galizzi H. Gallagher M. Galli N. Gallice V. Galymov E. Gamberini T. Gamble R. Gandhi S. Ganguly F. Gao S. Gao D. Garcia-Gamez M. Á. García-Peris F. Gardim S. Gardiner D. Gastler A. Gauch P. Gauzzi S. Gazzana G. Ge N. Geffroy B. Gelli S. Gent L. Gerlach A. Ghosh T. Giammaria D. Gibin I. Gil-Botella S. Gilligan A. Gioiosa S. Giovannella A. K. Giri C. Giugliano V. Giusti D. Gnani O. Gogota S. Gollapinni K. Gollwitzer R. A. Gomes L. V. Gomez Bermeo L. S. Gomez Fajardo D. Gonzalez-Diaz M. C. Goodman S. Goswami C. Gotti J. Goudeau E. Goudzovski C. Grace E. Gramellini R. Gran E. Granados P. Granger C. Grant D. R. Gratieri G. Grauso P. Green S. Greenberg J. Greer W. C. Griffith K. Grzelak L. Gu W. Gu V. Guarino M. Guarise R. Guenette M. Guerzoni D. Guffanti A. Guglielmi B. Guo F. Y. Guo V. Gupta G. Gurung D. Gutierrez P. Guzowski M. M. Guzzo S. Gwon A. Habig L. Haegel R. Hafeji L. Hagaman A. Hahn J. Hakenmüller T. Hamernik P. Hamilton J. Hancock M. Handley F. Happacher D. A. Harris A. L. Hart J. Hartnell T. Hartnett J. Harton T. Hasegawa C. M. Hasnip R. Hatcher S. Hawkins J. Hays M. He A. Heavey K. M. Heeger A. Heindel J. Heise P. Hellmuth L. Henderson K. Herner V. Hewes A. Higuera C. Hilgenberg A. Himmel E. Hinkle L. R. Hirsch J. Ho J. Hoefken Zink J. Hoff A. Holin T. Holvey C. Hong E. Hoppe S. Horiuchi G. A. Horton-Smith R. Hosokawa T. Houdy B. Howard R. Howell I. Hristova M. S. Hronek H. Hua J. Huang R. G. Huang X. Huang Z. Hulcher G. Iles N. Ilic A. M. Iliescu R. Illingworth G. Ingratta A. Ioannisian B. Irwin M. Ismerio Oliveira C. M. Jackson V. Jain E. James W. Jang B. Jargowsky D. Jena I. Jentz X. Ji C. Jiang J. Jiang A. Jipa J. H. Jo F. R. Joaquim W. Johnson C. Jollet R. Jones N. Jovancevic M. Judah C. K. Jung K. Y. Jung T. Junk Y. Jwa M. Kabirnezhad A. C. Kaboth I. Kadenko O. Kalikulov D. Kalra M. Kandemir D. M. Kaplan G. Karagiorgi G. Karaman A. Karcher Y. Karyotakis S. P. Kasetti L. Kashur A. Kauther N. Kazaryan L. Ke E. Kearns P. T. Keener K. J. Kelly R. Keloth E. Kemp O. Kemularia Y. Kermaidic W. Ketchum S. H. Kettell N. Khan A. Khvedelidze D. Kim J. Kim M. J. Kim S. Kim B. King M. King M. Kirby A. Kish J. Klein J. Kleykamp A. Klustova T. Kobilarcik L. Koch K. Koehler L. W. Koerner D. H. Koh M. Kordosky T. Kosc V. A. Kostelecký K. Kothekar I. Kotler M. Kovalcuk R. Kralik M. Kramer L. Kreczko F. Krennrich T. Kroupova S. Kubota M. Kubu V. A. Kudryavtsev G. Kufatty S. Kuhlmann J. Kumar M. Kumar P. Kumar P. Kumar S. Kumaran J. Kunzmann R. Kuravi V. Kus T. Kutter J. Kvasnicka T. Labree T. Lackey I. Lalău A. Lambert B. J. Land C. E. Lane N. Lane K. Lang T. Langford M. Langstaff F. Lanni J. Larkin P. Lasorak D. Last A. Laundrie G. Laurenti E. Lavaut P. Laycock I. Lazanu R. LaZur M. Lazzaroni T. Le S. Leardini J. Learned T. LeCompte G. Lehmann Miotto R. Lehnert M. Leitner H. Lemoine D. Leon Silverio L. M. Lepin J. -Y. Li S. W. Li Y. Li H. Liao R. Lima C. S. Lin D. Lindebaum S. Linden R. A. Lineros A. Lister B. R. Littlejohn H. Liu J. Liu Y. Liu S. Lockwitz I. Lomidze K. Long T. V. Lopes J. Lopez I. López de Rego N. López-March J. M. LoSecco W. C. Louis A. Lozano Sanchez X. -G. Lu K. B. Luk X. Luo E. Luppi A. A. Machado P. Machado C. T. Macias J. R. Macier M. MacMahon S. Magill C. Magueur K. Mahn A. Maio A. Major K. Majumdar A. Malige S. Mameli M. Man R. C. Mandujano J. Maneira S. Manly A. Mann K. Manolopoulos M. Manrique Plata S. Manthey Corchado V. N. Manyam L. Manzanillas-Velez M. Marchan A. Marchionni W. Marciano D. Marfatia C. Mariani J. Maricic F. Marinho A. D. Marino T. Markiewicz F. Das Chagas Marques C. Marquet M. Marshak C. M. Marshall J. Marshall L. Martina J. Martín-Albo N. Martinez D. A. Martinez Caicedo M. Martinez-Casales F. Martínez López P. Martínez Miravé S. Martynenko V. Mascagna A. Mastbaum M. Masud F. Matichard G. Matteucci J. Matthews C. Mauger N. Mauri K. Mavrokoridis I. Mawby F. Mayhew R. Mazza T. McAskill N. McConkey K. S. McFarland C. McGrew A. McNab C. McNulty J. Mead L. Meazza V. C. N. Meddage M. Mehmood B. Mehta P. Mehta F. Mei P. Melas L. Mellet O. Mena H. Mendez D. P. Méndez A. Menegolli G. Meng A. C. E. A. Mercuri A. Meregaglia M. D. Messier S. Metallo W. Metcalf M. Mewes H. Meyer T. Miao J. Micallef A. Miccoli G. Michna R. Milincic F. Miller G. Miller W. Miller A. Minotti L. Miralles Verge C. Mironov S. Miryala S. Miscetti C. S. Mishra P. Mishra S. R. Mishra A. Mislivec D. Mladenov I. Mocioiu A. Mogan R. Mohanta T. A. Mohayai N. Mokhov J. Molina L. Molina Bueno E. Montagna A. Montanari C. Montanari D. Montanari D. Montanino L. M. Montaño Zetina M. Mooney A. F. Moor M. Moore Z. Moore D. Moreno G. Moreno-Granados O. Moreno-Palacios L. Morescalchi R. Moretti C. Morris C. Mossey E. Motuk C. A. Moura G. Mouster W. Mu L. Mualem J. Mueller M. Muether F. Muheim A. Muir Y. Mukhamejanov A. Mukhamejanova M. Mulhearn D. Munford L. J. Munteanu H. Muramatsu J. Muraz M. Murphy T. Murphy J. Muse A. Mytilinaki J. Nachtman Y. Nagai S. Nagu D. Naples S. Narita J. Nava A. Navrer-Agasson N. Nayak M. Nebot-Guinot A. Nehm J. K. Nelson O. Neogi J. Nesbit M. Nessi D. Newbold M. Newcomer R. Nichol F. Nicolas-Arnaldos A. Nielsen A. Nikolica J. Nikolov E. Niner X. Ning K. Nishimura A. Norman A. Norrick P. Novella A. Nowak J. A. Nowak M. Oberling J. P. Ochoa-Ricoux S. Oh S. B. Oh A. Olivier T. Olson Y. Onel Y. Onishchuk A. Oranday M. Osbiston J. A. Osorio Vélez L. O'Sullivan L. Otiniano Ormachea L. Pagani G. Palacio O. Palamara S. Palestini J. M. Paley M. Pallavicini C. Palomares S. Pan M. Panareo P. Panda V. Pandey W. Panduro Vazquez E. Pantic V. Paolone A. Papadopoulou R. Papaleo D. Papoulias S. Paramesvaran S. Parke S. Parsa Z. Parsa S. Parveen M. Parvu D. Pasciuto S. Pascoli L. Pasqualini J. Pasternak J. L. Paton C. Patrick L. Patrizii R. B. Patterson T. Patzak A. Paudel L. Paulucci Z. Pavlovic G. Pawloski D. Payne A. Peake V. Pec E. Pedreschi S. J. M. Peeters W. Pellico E. Pennacchio A. Penzo O. L. G. Peres L. Pérez-Molina C. Pernas J. Perry D. Pershey G. Pessina G. Petrillo C. Petta R. Petti M. Pfaff V. Pia L. Pickering L. Pierini F. Pietropaolo V. L. Pimentel G. Pinaroli S. Pincha J. Pinchault K. Pitts K. Pletcher K. Plows C. Pollack T. Pollmann F. Pompa X. Pons N. Poonthottathil V. Popov F. Poppi J. Porter L. G. Porto Paixão M. Potekhin M. Pozzato R. Pradhan T. Prakash M. Prest F. Psihas D. Pugnere D. Pullia X. Qian J. Queen J. L. Raaf M. Rabelhofer V. Radeka J. Rademacker B. Radics F. Raffaelli A. Rafique E. Raguzin A. Rahe S. Rajagopalan M. Rajaoalisoa I. Rakhno L. Rakotondravohitra M. A. Ralaikoto L. Ralte M. A. Ramirez Delgado B. Ramson S. S. Randriamanampisoa A. Rappoldi G. Raselli T. Rath P. Ratoff R. Ray H. Razafinime R. F. Razakamiandra E. M. Rea J. S. Real B. Rebel R. Rechenmacher J. Reichenbacher S. D. Reitzner E. Renner S. Repetto S. Rescia F. Resnati C. Reynolds M. Ribas S. Riboldi C. Riccio G. Riccobene J. S. Ricol M. Rigan A. Rikalo E. V. Rincón A. Ritchie-Yates S. Ritter D. Rivera A. Robert A. Roberts E. Robles J. L. Rocabado Rocha M. Roda D. Rodas Rodríguez M. J. O. Rodrigues J. Rodriguez Rondon S. Rosauro-Alcaraz P. Rosier D. Ross M. Rossella M. Rossi M. Ross-Lonergan N. Roy P. Roy P. Roy C. Rubbia D. Rudik A. Ruggeri G. Ruiz Ferreira K. Rushiya B. Russell S. Sacerdoti N. Saduyev S. K. Sahoo N. Sahu S. Sakhiyev P. Sala G. Salmoria S. Samanta N. Samios M. C. Sanchez A. Sánchez Bravo A. Sánchez-Castillo P. Sanchez-Lucas D. A. Sanders S. Sanfilippo D. Santoro N. Saoulidou P. Sapienza I. Sarcevic I. Sarra G. Savage V. Savinov G. Scanavini A. Scaramelli A. Scarff T. Schefke H. Schellman S. Schifano P. Schlabach D. Schmitz A. W. Schneider K. Scholberg A. Schukraft B. Schuld S. Schwartz A. Segade E. Segreto C. R. Senise J. Sensenig S. H. Seo D. Seppela M. H. Shaevitz P. Shanahan P. Sharma R. Kumar S. Sharma Poudel K. Shaw T. Shaw K. Shchablo J. Shen C. Shepherd-Themistocleous J. Shi W. Shi S. Shin S. Shivakoti A. Shmakov I. Shoemaker D. Shooltz R. Shrock M. Siden J. Silber L. Simard J. Sinclair G. Sinev Jaydip Singh J. Singh L. Singh P. Singh V. Singh S. Singh Chauhan R. Sipos C. Sironneau G. Sirri K. Siyeon K. Skarpaas J. Smedley J. Smith P. Smith J. Smolik M. Smy M. Snape E. L. Snider P. Snopok M. Soares Nunes H. Sobel M. Soderberg C. J. Solano Salinas S. Söldner-Rembold N. Solomey V. Solovov W. E. Sondheim M. Sorbara M. Sorel J. Soto-Oton A. Sousa K. Soustruznik D. Souza Correia F. Spinella J. Spitz N. J. C. Spooner D. Stalder M. Stancari L. Stanco J. Steenis R. Stein H. M. Steiner A. F. Steklain Lisbôa J. Stewart B. Stillwell J. Stock T. Stokes M. Strait T. Strauss L. Strigari A. Stuart J. G. Suarez J. Subash A. Surdo L. Suter K. Sutton Y. Suvorov R. Svoboda S. K. Swain C. Sweeney B. Szczerbinska A. M. Szelc A. Sztuc A. Taffara N. Talukdar J. Tamara H. A. Tanaka S. Tang N. Taniuchi A. M. Tapia Casanova A. Tapper S. Tariq E. Tarpara E. Tatar R. Tayloe D. Tedeschi A. M. Teklu K. Tellez Giron Flores J. Tena Vidal P. Tennessen M. Tenti K. Terao F. Terranova G. Testera T. Thakore A. Thea S. Thomas A. Thompson C. Thorn C. Thorpe S. C. Timm E. Tiras V. Tishchenko S. Tiwari N. Todorović L. Tomassetti A. Tonazzo D. Torbunov D. Torres Muñoz M. Torti M. Tortola Y. Torun N. Tosi D. Totani M. Toups C. Touramanis V. Trabattoni D. Tran R. Travaglini J. Trevor E. Triller S. Trilov D. Trotta J. Truchon D. Truncali W. H. Trzaska Y. Tsai Y. -T. Tsai Z. Tsamalaidze K. V. Tsang N. Tsverava S. Z. Tu S. Tufanli C. Tunnell M. Tuzi J. Tyler E. Tyley M. Tzanov M. A. Uchida J. Ureña González J. Urheim T. Usher H. Utaegbulam S. Uzunyan M. R. Vagins P. Vahle G. A. Valdiviesso V. Vale E. Valencia R. Valentim Z. Vallari E. Vallazza J. W. F. Valle R. Van Berg D. V. Forero A. Vannozzi M. Van Nuland-Troost F. Varanini D. Vargas Oliva N. Vaughan K. Vaziri A. Vázquez-Ramos J. Vega J. Vences S. Ventura A. Verdugo S. Vergani M. Verzocchi K. Vetter M. Vicenzi H. Vieira de Souza C. Vignoli C. Vilela E. Villa S. Viola B. Viren G. V. Stenico R. Vizarreta A. P. Vizcaya Hernandez S. Vlachos G. Vorobyev Q. Vuong A. V. Waldron M. Wallach J. Walsh T. Walton L. Wan B. Wang H. Wang J. Wang L. Wang M. H. L. S. Wang X. Wang Y. Wang K. Warburton D. Warner L. Warsame M. O. Wascko D. Waters A. Watson K. Wawrowska A. Weber C. M. Weber M. Weber H. Wei A. Weinstein S. Westerdale M. Wetstein K. Whalen A. White L. H. Whitehead D. Whittington F. Wieler J. Wilhlemi M. J. Wilking A. Wilkinson C. Wilkinson F. Wilson R. J. Wilson P. Winter J. Wolcott J. Wolfs T. Wongjirad A. Wood K. Wood E. Worcester M. Worcester K. Wresilo M. Wright M. Wrobel S. Wu W. Wu W. Wu M. Wurm J. Wyenberg B. M. Wynne Y. Xiao I. Xiotidis B. Yaeggy N. Yahlali E. Yandel G. Yang J. Yang T. Yang A. Yankelevich L. Yates K. Yonehara T. Young B. Yu H. Yu J. Yu Y. Yu W. Yuan R. Zaki J. Zalesak L. Zambelli B. Zamorano A. Zani O. Zapata L. Zazueta G. P. Zeller J. Zennamo J. Zettlemoyer K. Zeug C. Zhang S. Zhang M. Zhao E. Zhivun E. D. Zimmerman S. Zucchelli V. Zutshi R. Zwaska http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23489v1 2025-03-30T15:42:20Z

This document expands on the Comprehensive Summary submitted to the EPPSU 2026. It contains details on aspects of the HALHF project that could not be fitted into the Summary. Some sections contain work that is still preliminary and/or status reports on current progress.

2025-03-30T15:42:20Z Submitted to the European Particle Physics Strategy Update 2026 Erik Adli Joshua Appleby Timothy L. Barklow Marica Biagini Jonas Björklund Svensson Mikael Berggren Simone Bettoni Stewart Boogert Philip Burrows Allen Caldwell Jian Bin Ben Chen Vera Cilento Laura Corner Richard D'Arcy Steffen Doebert Wang Dou Pierre Drobniak Calvin Dyson Sinead Farrington John Farmer Angeles Faus-Golfe Manuel Formela Arianne Formenti Louis Forrester Brian Foster Jie Gao Spencer Gessner Niclas Hamann Alexander Harrison Mark J. Hogan Eir Eline Hørlyk Daniel Kalvik Antoine Laudrain Reme Lehe Wim Leemans Carl A. Lindstrøm Benno List Jenny List Xueying Lu Edward Mactavish Vasyl Maslov Emilio Nanni John Osborne Jens Osterhoff Felipe Peña Gudrid Moortgat Pick Kristjan Põder Jurgen Reuter Dmitrii Samoilenko Nela Sedlackova Andrei Seryi Kyrre Sjobak Terry Sloan Steinar Stapnes Rogelio Tomas Garcia Maxim Titov Malte Trautwein Maxence Thévenet Nicholas J. Walker Marc Wenskat Matthew Wing Jonathan Wood http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19880v2 2025-03-30T15:26:44Z

HALHF is a hybrid linear collider that uses electron-driven plasma-wakefield acceleration to accelerate electrons to high energy while using radio-frequency cavity technology to accelerate positrons. The most cost-effective solution collides low-energy positrons with high-energy electrons, producing a boost to the final state in the electron direction with $γ= 1.67$. The current HALHF baseline design produces a luminosity comparable to that of the baseline ILC but with a greatly reduced construction and carbon footprint and hence much lower cost than the mature linear-collider designs ILC and CLIC. Costs for HALHF are evaluated, together with that for the approximate 15-year R\&D programme necessary to realise HALHF. Time scales and cost for the R\&D are estimated. Upgrade paths for HALHF technology from a 250~GeV Higgs factory, through 380 and 550~GeV, up to 10~TeV are sketched.

2025-03-25T17:46:16Z Submitted to the European Strategy for Particle Physics, 2026 Update Erik Adli Joshua Appleby Timothy L. Barklow Marica Biagini Jonas Björklund Svensson Mikael Berggren Simone Bettoni Stewart Boogert Philip Burrows Allen Caldwell Jian Bin Ben Chen Vera Cilento Laura Corner Richard D'Arcy Steffen Doebert Wang Dou Pierre Drobniak Calvin Dyson Sinead Farrington John Farmer Angeles Faus-Golfe Manuel Formela Arianne Formenti Louis Forrester Brian Foster Jie Gao Spencer Gessner Niclas Hamann Alexander Harrison Mark J. Hogan Eir Eline Hørlyk Daniel Kalvik Antoine Laudrain Reme Lehe Wim Leemans Carl A. Lindstrøm Benno List Jenny List Xueying Lu Edward Mactavish Vasyl Maslov Emilio Nanni John Osborne Jens Osterhoff Felipe Peña Gudrid Moortgat Pick Kristjan Põder Jurgen Reuter Dmitrii Samoilenko Nela Sedlackova Andrei Seryi Kyrre Sjobak Terry Sloan Steinar Stapnes Rogelio Tomas Garcia Maxim Titov Malte Trautwein Maxence Thévenet Nicholas J. Walker Marc Wenskat Matthew Wing Jonathan Wood http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22834v1 2025-03-28T19:04:12Z

This document represents a contribution of the United States early career collider physics community to the 2025--2026 update to the European Strategy for Particle Physics. Preferences with regard to different future collider options and R&D priorities were assessed via a survey. The early career community was defined as anyone who is a graduate student, postdoctoral researcher, untenured faculty member, or research scientist under 40 years of age. In total, 105 participants responded to the survey between February and March 10th, 2025. Questions were formulated primarily to gauge the enthusiasm and preferences for different collider options in line with the recommendations of the United States' P5 report, relevant to the European Strategy Update.

2025-03-28T19:04:12Z Contribution to the 2025 European Strategy Update. 11 pages, 13 figures Oz Amram Grace Cummings