https://arxiv.org/api/pzfsLjwKVnNTYKkl8Jm8bA598cE2026-04-14T16:19:13Z874555515http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23691v1Surface Finishing and Coatings for Accelerator Vacuum Applications2025-06-30T10:10:56ZThe main applications and techniques of thin film coating and plating on vacuum components for particle accelerators are reviewed through significative examples.2025-06-30T10:10:56Z11 pages, contribution to the CAS - CERN Accelerator School: Mechanical & Materials Engineering for Particle Accelerators and Detectors, 2-15 June 2024, Sint-Michielsgestel, NetherlandsMauro Taborellihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01597v3Simulation studies of a high-repetition-rate electron-driven surface muon beamline at SHINE2025-06-30T00:56:28ZA high-repetition-rate pulsed muon source operating at approximately 50\,kHz holds the potential to improve the sensitivity of various particle physics and material science experiments involving muons. In this article, we propose utilizing the high-repetition-rate pulsed electron beam at the SHINE facility to generate a surface muon beam. Our simulation studies indicate that an 8\,GeV, 100\,pC charge pulsed electron beam impinging on a copper target can produce up to $2 \times 10^{3}$ muons per pulse. Beamline optimization results demonstrate that approximately 60 surface muons per electron bunch can be efficiently transported to the end of the beamline. This translates to a surface muon rate of $3 \times 10^{6}\,μ^{+}$/s when the pulsed electron beam is operated at 50\,kHz, which is comparable to existing muon facilities. This high-repetition-rate pulsed muon beam, with its ideal time structure, represents a unique and pioneering effort once constructed. It serves as a model for building cost-effective muon sources at existing electron machines with GeV electron energies. In addition to the typical challenges encountered in conventional muon beamlines, such as the installation and construction of the target station and beamline, the removal of substantial quantities of positrons is also a major challenge. A potential solution to this issue is also discussed.2025-03-03T14:33:16Z30 pages, 15 figuresPhys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 083401 (2025)Fangchao LiuYusuke TakeuchiSi ChenSiyuan ChenKim Siang KhawMeng LyuZiwen PanDong WangJiangtao WangLiang WangWenzhen Xu10.1103/t2d3-xqnphttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17384v2Nuclear Physics at BRIF2025-06-28T01:53:59ZThe Beijing Radioactive Ion-beam Facility (BRIF), which is based on Isotope Separation On-Line (ISOL) technique, consists of a 100 MeV proton cyclotron as the driving accelerator, a two-stage ISOL system for ion separation, a 13-MV tandem accelerator for post-acceleration, a superconducting linac for further boosting beam energies. It is capable of providing ISOL beams in the energy range from 60 to 300 keV, and post-accelerated beams in the energy range from 3 to 10 MeV/u for nuclei with mass numbers of A < 80 by Isotope Separation On-Line (ISOL) technique. For nuclei with A up to 170, energies are still able to reach 3 MeV/u. This facility offers opportunities to address key questions of current interest in nuclear astrophysics, nuclear structure and reactions of unstable nuclei. In this review we present a comprehensive introduction to the BRIF and the typical experimental instruments installed on it, and then summarize current experimental results on unstable Na and Rb isotopes and future plan for further development of the BRIF to improve its performance.2025-03-16T10:15:15Z82 pages, 77 figuresWei NanBing GuoJie ChenBaoqun CuiWei FuXianlu JiaChaoxin KanJiayinghao LiYunju LiChengjian LinYihui LiuNanru MaZhaohua PengYangping ShenGuofang SongJun SuBing TangHaorui WangYoubao WangLei YangXiaofei YangZhiguo YinYun ZhengTianjue ZhangWeiping Liuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21289v1Dynamic Focusing to Suppress Emittance Transfer in Crab-Crossing Flat Beam Collisions2025-06-26T14:10:05ZFlat hadron beam collisions, though expected to enhance peak luminosity by about an order of magnitude, have not yet been demonstrated. Our study reveals a critical limitation: realistic fluctuations, when amplified by synchro-betatron resonance, lead to transverse emittance transfer in flat-beam collisions. Using beam-beam simulations based on Electron-Ion Collider design parameters, we show that this effect leads to vertical emittance growth, which can distort the flat-beam profile and degrade luminosity. We propose a dynamic focusing scheme that combines sextupoles with crab cavities to suppress the hourglass-induced resonance. This approach increases tolerance to fluctuations and improves the robustness of flat-beam collisions. This practical mitigation facilitates the adoption of flat-beam collisions in next-generation lepton-hadron colliders.2025-06-26T14:10:05Z5 figuresDerong XuJ Scott BergMichael M BlaskiewiczYue HaoYun LuoChristoph MontagSergei NagaitsevBoris PodobedovVadim PtitsynFerdinand WillekeBinping Xiaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20840v1Design of a Fast Reactive Tuner for 1.3 GHz TESLA cavities at MESA2025-06-25T21:24:38ZThis work presents a state-of-the-art design of a Ferroelectric Fast Reactive Tuner (FE-FRT), capable of modulating high reactive power in TESLA type cavities on a microsecond time scale. The Mainz Energy-Recovering Superconducting Accelerator employs superconducting radio frequency cavities operating at 1.3 GHz, achieving quality factors on the order of $10^{10}$. However, detuning of $\pm$25 Hz induced by microphonics have led to the use of strong coupling for the fundamental power coupler, requiring high-power amplifiers, orders of magnitude above the intrinsic dissipation. Current solutions to mitigate microphonics rely on piezoelectric tuners, which are not fast enough for the spectral range of the microphonics. A novel alternative is the FE-FRT, a technology made possible by the development of low-loss ferroelectric materials, which offer sub-microsecond response times. Analytical results are provided along with their validation through finite-element simulations. The FE-FRT is expected to handle substantial reactive power while offering a tuning range of 50 Hz in these type of cavities, resulting in a reduction in peak forward RF power by about an order of magnitude.2025-06-25T21:24:38Z7 pages, 8 figuresRicardo Monroy-VillaIlan Ben-ZviFlorian HugTimo Stenglerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20663v1Operational Experience of the NML Cryogenic Plant at the FAST Test Facility2025-06-25T17:55:14ZThe NML cryogenic plant cools two individually cryostated superconducting radio frequency (SRF) capture cavities and one prototype ILC cryomodule with eight SRF cavities. This complex accelerates electrons at 150 MeV for the Integrable Optics Test Accelerator (IOTA) ring, located at the Fermilab Accelerator Science and Technology (FAST) facility. The cryogenic plant is composed of two nitrogen precooled Tevatron satellite refrigerators, two Mycom 2016C compressors, a cryogenic distribution system, a Frick purifier compressor, two charcoal bed adsorber purifiers, and a liquid ring vacuum pump with a roots booster. The SRF cavities are immersed in a 2.0 K liquid helium bath, shielded with a 5 K gaseous helium shield and a liquid nitrogen cooled thermal shield. Since 2019, this R&D accelerator complex has gone through four science runs with an average duration of 12 months. Operational experience for each run, availability metrics, performance data and common outages are presented in this paper.2025-06-25T17:55:14Z26th joint CEC/ICMC ConferenceTimothy WallaceFermilabJoaquim Creus-PratsFermilabJoseph HurdFermilabMichael J WhiteFermilabJerry MakaraFermilabLiujin PeiFermilabBenjamin HansenFermilabJay TheilackerFermilabRick BossertFermilabAlexander MartinezFermilabJames K SantucciFermilabSasha RomanovFermilabhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19763v2Optimization Studies of Radiation Shielding for the PIP-II Project at Fermilab2025-06-25T11:49:57ZThe PIP-II project at Fermilab, which includes an 800-MeV superconducting LINAC, demands rigorous radiation shielding optimization to meet safety requirements. We updated the MARS geometry model to reflect new magnet and collimator designs and introduced high-resolution detector planes to better capture radiation field distributions. To overcome the significant computational demands, we implemented a well-known branching technique that drastically reduced simulation runtimes while maintaining statistical integrity. This was achieved through particle splitting and the application of Russian Roulette techniques. Additionally, new graphical tools were created to streamline data visualization and MARS code usability.2025-06-24T16:23:45Z16th workshop on Shielding aspects of Accelerators, Targets and Irradiation Facilities (SATIF-16)Alajos MakovecFermilabDali GeorgobianiFermilabIgor RakhnoFermilabIgor TropinFermilabhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20313v1Performance of High-Intensity Electron Linacs as Drivers for Compact Neutron Sources2025-06-25T10:51:15ZThe demand for neutron production facilities is increasing, as the applications of neutron science are manifold. These applications drive the need for efficient and compact neutron sources. In this context, this paper explores the potential performance of normal-conducting compact electron linacs from 20 MeV to 500 MeV as drivers for neutron sources. Results from a G4BEAMLINE simulation study find optimum dimensions of a tungsten target and characterize the emitted neutron spectrum. Two electron linac are then evaluated as drivers of such target: HPCI, an X-band linac; and CTF3 drive beam linac, an S-band alternative. The simulation study shows neutron strength values up to $1.5\cdot 10^{15}$ n/s can be attained, as well as low energy consumed per neutron produced values up to $5.65 \cdot 10^{-10}$ J/n, suggesting these electron-based neutron sources may be a compact and energy-efficient solution for many research, industry and medical applications.2025-06-25T10:51:15ZJavier Olivares HerradorLaurence M. WroeAndrea LatinaRoberto CorsiniWalter WuenschSteinar StapnesNuria Fuster-MartınezBenito GimenoDaniel Esperantehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19824v1Laser Wakefield Acceleration Driven by a Discrete Flying Focus2025-06-24T17:40:08ZLaser wakefield acceleration (LWFA) may enable the next generation of TeV-scale lepton colliders. Reaching such energies will likely require multiple LWFA stages to overcome limitations on the energy gain achievable in a single stage. The use of stages, however, introduces challenges such as alignment, adiabatic matching between stages, and a lower average accelerating gradient. Here, we propose a discrete flying focus that can deliver higher energy gain in a single stage, thereby reducing the number of stages required for a target energy. A sequence of laser pulses with staggered focal points and delays drives a plasma wave in which an electron beam experiences a near-constant accelerating gradient over distances beyond those attainable with a conventional pulse. Simulations demonstrate that a discrete flying focus with a total energy of 150 J can transfer 40 GeV per electron to a 50-pC beam in a single 30-cm stage, corresponding to 50 dephasing lengths.2025-06-24T17:40:08ZJacob R. PierceKyle G. MillerFei LiJohn P. PalastroWarren B. Morihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19736v1Dual-energy extraction for proton therapy and imaging: validation on a clinical synchrotron-based facility2025-06-24T15:54:38ZThe purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of extracting proton beams with two distinct energies within a single synchrotron cycle. The energy difference between the beams should be sufficient to use one beam as a range probe to guide the second therapeutic beam in a synchrotron-based proton therapy facility. A clinical synchrotron-based proton therapy facility with a maximum clinical energy of 250 megaeV (MeV) and an experimental energy capability of 330 MeV was used for the study. The synchrotron's internal diagnostic equipment, including beam orbit monitors, dipole magnetic field sensors, acceleration frequency monitors, and energy measurement devices, was used to characterize the properties of the beams within the synchrotron and during extraction. External dosimetric equipment included a PTW water tank fitted with two ionization chambers and an ionization chamber array. These were used to validate dual-energy extraction at the irradiation isocenter independently. Dual-energy extraction was demonstrated across three defined energy ranges: low (75-110 MeV), intermediate (120-155 MeV), and high (195-230 MeV). Both re-acceleration and de-acceleration modes were tested and validated. This preliminary study achieved an energy difference of 35 MeV between extracted beams across the three evaluated energy ranges. This corresponds to clinical targets used under standard operating conditions and does not require hardware modifications. Future studies should explore adjusting the control software to enable target switching during a single cycle or the use of suboptimal targets for higher-energy beams. This would allow for active, real-time range probing. Combining modified dual-energy extraction parameters with low-intensity extraction for high-energy beams shows great promise in enabling simultaneous proton imaging and therapy within a single synchrotron cycle.2025-06-24T15:54:38ZAlexander A. PryanichnikovDmitry ShwartzJon FeldmandJoao SecoMaria Francesca Spadeahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06469v3AI-Assisted Transport of Radioactive Ion Beams2025-06-24T15:36:26ZBeams of radioactive heavy ions allow researchers to study rare and unstable atomic nuclei, shedding light into the internal structure of exotic nuclei and on how chemical elements are formed in stars. However, the extraction and transport of radioactive beams rely on time-consuming expert-driven tuning methods, where hundreds of parameters are manually optimized. Here, we introduce a system that employs Artificial Intelligence (AI), specifically utilizing Bayesian Optimization, to assist in the transport process of radioactive beams. We apply our methodology to real-life scenarios showing advantages when compared with standard tuning methods. This AI-assisted approach can be extended to other radioactive beam facilities around the world to improve operational efficiency and enhance scientific output.2025-04-08T22:21:54Z6 pages, 6 figures; Results section expanded. More references and DOI addedSergio Lopez-CaceresDaniel Santiago-Gonzalez10.1103/bwxw-w9jchttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18492v1Relativistic quantum mechanics of charged vortex particles accelerated in a uniform electric field2025-06-23T10:44:11ZThe relativistic quantum-mechanical description of a charged Laguerre-Gauss beam accelerated in a uniform electric field has been fulfilled. Stationary wave eigenfunctions are rigorously derived. The evolution of the beam parameters during acceleration is considered in detail. The practically important effect of extraordinary suppression of transverse spreading of the beam is discovered, carefully analyzed, and properly explained. Our results provide direct evidence that vortex particle beams can be accelerated without destroying their intrinsic vortex properties, paving the way for high-energy vortex beam applications.2025-06-23T10:44:11ZQi MengZiqiang HuangXuan LiuWei MaZhen YangLiang LuAlexander J. SilenkoPengming ZhangLiping Zouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.20078v2A Time-Dependent Ginzburg-Landau Framework for Sample-Specific Simulation of Superconductors for SRF Applications2025-06-20T07:14:27ZModern superconducting radio frequency (SRF) applications demand precise control over material properties across multiple length scales - from microscopic composition, to mesoscopic defect structures, to macroscopic cavity geometry. We present a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) framework that incorporates spatially varying parameters derived from experimental measurements and ab initio calculations, enabling realistic, sample-specific simulations. As a demonstration, we model Sn-deficient islands in Nb$_3$Sn and calculate the field at which vortex nucleation first occurs for various defect configurations. These thresholds serve as a predictive tool for identifying defects likely to degrade SRF cavity performance. We then simulate the resulting dissipation and show how aggregate contributions from multiple small defects can reproduce trends consistent with high-field $Q$-slope behavior observed experimentally. Our results offer a pathway for connecting microscopic defect properties to macroscopic SRF performance using a computationally efficient mesoscopic model.2024-10-26T04:57:19Z19 pages, 9 figuresAiden V. HarbickMark K. Transtrum10.1103/q9h5-83fyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16599v1Towards a New and Compact Gas-Dynamic Cooler- Buncher for the FAIR Laspec and MATS Experiments2025-06-19T21:00:52ZIn this article, we propose a new gas-dynamic ion beam cooler-buncher for the FAIR Laspec and MATS experiments. This very compact and having a simple design gas-dynamic cooler-buncher has a length of just 10.5 cm. It can convert continuous ion beams of various masses and with a transmission efficiency of around 100% into pulsed, high-quality ion beams. The special design of the supersonic nozzle and the RF-only funnel enables sufficient buffer gas (helium) thickness for effective ion beam cooling with an injection energy of up to several keV, without compromising the high vacuum in the other parts of the setup. The beams with a longitudinal emittance of down to 10 eV ns will be available. This emittance value is 20 times superior to the best current RFQ cooler-bunchers can deliver. We explored the operation of the proposed new gas-dynamic cooler-buncher by conducting detailed gas-dynamic and Monte Carlo ion-trajectory simulations. The results of these simulations are presented and discussed.2025-06-19T21:00:52ZVictor Varentsovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.24049v2The Linear Collider Facility (LCF) at CERN2025-06-19T10:45:57ZIn this paper we outline a proposal for a Linear Collider Facility as the next flagship project for CERN. It offers the opportunity for a timely, cost-effective and staged construction of a new collider that will be able to comprehensively map the Higgs boson's properties, including the Higgs field potential, thanks to a large span in centre-of-mass energies and polarised beams. A comprehensive programme to study the Higgs boson and its closest relatives with high precision requires data at centre-of-mass energies from the Z pole to at least 1 TeV. It should include measurements of the Higgs boson in both major production mechanisms, ee -> ZH and ee -> vvH, precision measurements of gauge boson interactions as well as of the W boson, Higgs boson and top-quark masses, measurement of the top-quark Yukawa coupling through ee ->ttH, measurement of the Higgs boson self-coupling through HH production, and precision measurements of the electroweak couplings of the top quark. In addition, ee collisions offer discovery potential for new particles complementary to HL-LHC.2025-03-31T13:12:13ZSubmission to the ESPPU, as updated version May 26H. AbramowiczE. AdliF. AlharthiM. Almanza-SotoM. M. AltakachS. Ampudia CastelazoD. Angal-KalininJ. A. AnguianoR. B. ApplebyO. ApsimonA. ArbeyO. ArqueroD. AttiéJ. L. Avila-JimenezH. BaerY. BaiC. BalazsP. BambadeT. BarklowJ. BaudotP. BechtleT. BehnkeA. B. BelleriveS. BelomestnykhY. BenhammouJ. Berenguer-AntequeraM. BergerM. BerggrenM. BertucciM. BesançonD. BettT. BiekötterS. BilanishviliB. BilkiB. BilkiJ. Björklund SvenssonV. M. BjellandC. BlanchB. BliewertM. BoehlerS. BoogertM. BoronatV. BoudryD. BourilkovI. BozovicJ. BraathenJ. E. BrauC. BreuningJ. -C. BrientI. BrockB. BrudnowskiK. BuesserE. BulyakP. N. BurrowsG. BurtO. CakirA. CaldwellA. C. CanbayF. G. CelibertoE. CenniI. ChaikovskaR. ChehabG. ChenJ. B. B. ChenT. ChikamatsuV. CilentoP. ColasM. ComanL. CornerF. CornetF. Cornet-GomezF. CorriveauR. CorsiniJ. CvachR. D'ArcyC. DamerellA. DasS. DasuJ. de BlasE. Del CoreM. DemarteauH. DenizliR. DermisekA. DharS. DittmaierF. DjurabekovaE. M. DoneganiA. DoyleP. DrobniakT. A. du PreeB. DudarH. Duran YildizJ. DuttaS. EasoG. EckerlinU. EinhausC. EmmaE. EsareyD. EsperanteD. EspriuL. R EvansJ. FarmerA. Faus GolfeM. FernandezJ. C. Fernandez-OrtegaM. FormelaA. FormentiB. FosterN. FourchesM. C. FouzC. D. FuK. FujiiJ. FujimotoB. FuksJ. FusterN. Fuster-MartínezM. GabelmannF. GaedeM. GallettiE. GalloS. GanjourM. V. GarzelliC. G. R. GeddesR. L. GengS. GessnerI. D. GialamasB. GimenoJ. GoldsteinM. GoncerzA. J. GonsalvesF. J. GonzalezD. González-IglesiasJ. GramesP. GrannisL. GrayG. GrenierH. GulerH. E. HaberK. HamaguchiN. HamannO. HartbrichN. M. HartmanG. HütsiS. HeinemeyerC. HenselK. HidakaS. HiroseA. H. HoangM. J. HoganW. HollikY. HoriiR. HosokawaS. HuangD. HyndsM. I. IdzikY. IiyamaA. IrlesA. IshikawaM. IshinoI. P. IvanovM. JacewiczR. JaramilloD. JeansC. JingR. M JonesW. KaabiM. KaganJ. KalinowskiD. K KalvikJ. KaminskiK. KannikeA. KaramY. KatoK. KawagoeD. KäferL. KennedyJ. KerstenS. A. KhanV. A. KhozeW. KilianJ. KlamkaP. KluitK. KongP. KoppenburgA. KorsunA. V. KotwalS. KramlK. KrügerM. KucharczykN. KumarY. KuriharaJ. KvasnickaI. LaktinehA. LatinaF. LeDiberderA. LevyM. LiepeC. A. LindstrømB. ListJ. ListM. LitosV. N. LitvinenkoA. Lopez-VirtoX. LuT. LuoM. LupbergerB. MadisonT. MadlenerJ. MaedaF. MahmoudiE. MainaN. MajernikR. Margraf-O'NealT. W. MarkiewiczP. Martín-LunaA. MartensV. J. MartinL. MarzolaV. I. MaslovK. T. MatchevS. MatsumotoK. MawatariJ. P. MárquezM. M. MühlleitnerA. McIlvennyP. A. McIntoshK. MekalaD. MeliniF. MeloniA. MenéndezK. MimasuV. MirallesW. MitaroffV. A. MitsouL. MonacoG. Moortgat-PickM. Moreno-LlácerT. MoriJ. M. MoronS. MortonD. MoyaM. MulderH. MurayamaE. MusumeciV. V. MytrochenkoN. NagataE. NagyT. NakadaJ. NakajimaK. NakamuraE. A. NanniE. NardiS. NaritaM. T. Núñez Pardo de VeraM. NojiriD. NtounisA. OdyO. M. OgreidT. OhlC. OleariM. OlvegårdY. OnelH. OnoW. OotaniC. OreroJ. OsborneK. OsterbergJ. OsterhoffM. OuchemhouQ. OuyangS. Pagan GrisoR. PaparellaS. C. ParkJ. PataJ. R. PattersonR. PöschlF. PeñaL. K Pedraza-MotavitaM. E. PeskinF. PilatP. PiotS. PlätzerI. PolakW. PorodK. PotamianosC. T. PotterP. PouloseJ. G. PowerD. ProtopopescuH. R. QiJ. Rabara BaileyA. RacioppiM. RaidalJ. P. RalstonA. RastogiL. ReichenbachL. ReichweinL. ReinaJ. ReuterF. RichardS. RiemannR. A. RimmerT. RobensA. RobsonG. RodrigoC. S. RoganJ. RojoM. Q. RuanR. RuberS. RudrabhatlaA. Ruiz JimenoY. SakakiF. SalvatoreS. SasikumarT SchörnerA. ScheinkerS. SchroederC. B. SchroederI. SchulthessM. SchumacherA. SchwartzmanY. SeiyaA. SenolH. SertD. SertoreA. SeryiT. ShidaraK. SjobakI. SmiljanicS. SpannagelM. SpiraM. StanitzkiS. StapnesD. StoreyJ. StrubeS. SuA. SubbaA. SubbaT. SueharaK. SugizakiZ. SunT. TakahashiT. TakeshitaT. TauchiG. TaylorD. TerzaniT. TeubnerJ. TianJ. TimmermansM. TitovR. Tomas GarciaT. TongJ. M. TorndalM. TrautweinK. TsumuraB. TuchmingD. TucklerI. Turk CakirM. TytgatA. UklejaC. ValleeR. Van KootenJ. van TilborgA. VauthM. VellascoC. VernieriL. VerraI. VidakovicH. VideauI. VilaM. VillaplanaM. VosN. VukasinovicN. WalkerK. Wandall-ChristensenY. WangB. F. L. WardT. WatanabeN. K. WatsonG. WeigleinJ. D. WellsH. WennlöfM. WenskatS. WesthoffJ. W. WetzelA. P. WhiteP. H. WilliamsM. WilliamsG. W. WilsonM. WingA. WinterM. WinterT. WojtonJ. C. WoodW. WuenschX. XiaH. YamamotoA. YamamotoK. YamamotoS. YamashitaM. YamauchiM. YoshiokaJ. ZalesakA. F. ZarneckiK. ZembaczynskiD. ZerwasW. ZhangJ. ZhangY. ZhangM. ZielinskiM. Zobov