https://arxiv.org/api/UPlVnCItqWzTXgoHCDmt0m2UB8k2026-09-10T18:16:01Z90111515http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04571v1Nonlinear Photoemission for Bright Beams in X-Band Photoinjectors2026-09-03T23:59:27ZThe ongoing development of low-cost and compact x-ray light sources is vital for increasing the number of experiments that can be performed at the atomic scale. Smaller sources can be operated in blow-out mode, in which a high-charge, short-bunch length electron beam self compresses into a uniformly ellipsoidal shape. This mode necessitates a photoinjector whose laser has a pulse duration on the order of $10^2$ fs. In this case, linear photoemission with an ultraviolet laser presents significant technical challenges, as many optical substrates degrade at these wavelengths. In this paper, we present an alternative design that uses nonlinear photoemission to produce electron beams with high charge and short bunch length. This photoinjector design produces an electron beam with a bunch charge of up to $200$ pC, an RMS bunch length of $140$ fs, a normalized transverse emittance of $1$ to $1.4$ mm$\cdot$mrad, and an energy spread of $10^{-4}$. This results in a beam brightness of $9.74\times10^{18}$ A/m$^2$, which is bright enough for our beamline's purposes. Ongoing efforts are aimed at further increasing the electron beam brightness by using a spatial light modulator to shape the laser2026-09-03T23:59:27ZCasey TimmsBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityLucas MalinBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityKevin EckroshBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversitySean E. TiltonBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversityLidia C. SantanderBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversityHyung Seo LeeBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversityRejul JaswalBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversityAlex GardeckBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityEric EverettBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversityAlan DupreBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityMukhtar HussainBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversitySami TantawiBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversityWilliam GravesBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Applied Structural Discovery, Arizona State UniversityHenrik LoosBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityMark HollBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityArvinder SandhuBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversityRobert KaindlBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Applied Structural Discovery, Arizona State UniversitySamuel TeitelbaumBiodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Physics, Arizona State UniversityCenter for Applied Structural Discovery, Arizona State Universityhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04421v1HELIX: a hybrid envelope-multiparticle linac code with differentiable space-charge optimization2026-09-03T19:38:12ZHELIX (Hybrid Envelope-multiparticle LInac eXplorer) is a Python hadron-linac framework developed at Fermilab for the PIP-II superconducting H- linac. It combines exact-gradient matching through a self-consistent nonlinear particle-in-cell (PIC) space-charge solve with the lattice-card workflow used for machine design. One TraceWin-format lattice drives an rms-envelope solver with 3-D linearized space charge, a multiparticle tracker with a 3-D FFT PIC solve, and linear matrix analysis over one data model, and the constraint cards that steer six classical matching algorithms also steer a differentiable seventh, which re-expresses a fixed-energy subset of the tracking-plus-PIC map as a single PyTorch graph and returns reverse-mode Jacobians exact to floating-point precision at a cost set by the number of constraints rather than of knobs. On a six-quadrupole manufactured verification problem the exact-Jacobian run reaches a tolerance-normalized residual of $3.2\times10^{-10}$, some 200 times below the finite-difference endpoint at the same forward-equivalent budget; the Jacobian cost is flat in the knob count, with the crossover between ten and twelve knobs and reverse mode 1.45 times faster at sixteen. Verification is hierarchical, from analytic envelope references through $10^{-9}$-$10^{-13}$ cross-implementation PIC parity to TraceWin benchmarks on the PIP-II low-energy, medium-energy and accelerating lines: with space charge on, the rms moments along the MEBT and half-wave-resonator line agree within 0.7%, and over the 186-m linac the energy agrees within 0.03% and transmission within the combined statistical uncertainty. HELIX also provides machine-learned field-map surrogates, Pareto exploration, error Monte Carlo with orbit correction, failure compensation, and RFQ transport, with NumPy, C++/OpenMP, CUDA and Metal backends.2026-09-03T19:38:12ZAbhishek Pathakhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04293v1Design optimization, commissioning, and uncertainty analysis of the quadrupole resonator system at Jefferson Lab for SRF material characterization2026-09-03T13:06:45ZA quadrupole resonator (QPR) provides a sample-based platform for characterizing materials for superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) applications under controlled field, frequency, and temperature conditions. This paper presents the design optimization, commissioning, and validation of the Jefferson Lab QPR system, including a quantitative assessment of measurement uncertainty. The resonator geometry was re-optimized from the CERN version-II design to improve quadrupole-mode separation and enable four usable modes at 400, 806, 1221, and 1640 MHz. The measurement system combines self-excited-loop RF operation, cable-loss-corrected power calibration, decay-based external-Q calibration, and RF-DC thermal-substitution calorimetry to determine the peak surface magnetic field Bpk and sample surface resistance Rs. Commissioning measurements on bulk Nb and Nb3Sn-Ta-Cu samples validated the system response over a broad range of frequency, temperature, and RF field. The extracted superconducting energy-gap parameters are consistent with the reported values for Nb and Nb3Sn, as well as with those obtained from single-cell cavity measurements. The commissioned system operates from 1.8 K to near the superconducting transition temperature of the sample, with accessible Bpk values from approximately 5 mT to a sample- and temperature-dependent heater-power-budget limit; a maximum field of 60 mT was demonstrated for bulk Nb at 400 MHz and 4 K. The combined relative standard uncertainties are 8.3% for Bpk and below 18% for Rs when r = PDC2/PDC1 is less than 0.9. The worst-case Bpk resolution at the 95% confidence level is approximately 1.35 mT, while the Rs resolution is below 1 nOhm at 10 mT and 2 K. These results establish the JLab QPR as a calibrated, multi-frequency platform with quantified measurement uncertainty for SRF material characterization.2026-09-03T13:06:45ZMingqi GeSarra BiraKristof BrunnerNatalie GaleMarco GarlascheValentin GigliaOleksandr HryhorenkoJustin KentPeter OwenUttar PudasainiGuillaume RosazKarol SciborPramita TiwariAnne-Marie Valente-FelicianoLorena Vega CidWalter VenturiniHaipeng Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03771v1Effects of the Direct Space Charge on Transverse Coupled-Bunch Instabilities2026-09-03T12:42:14ZThe ultralow transverse emittance of diffraction-limited electron storage rings leads to high beam densities, making direct space-charge effects increasingly relevant despite their relativistic suppression at high energy. In this work, we investigate the impact of direct space charge on transverse coupled-bunch instabilities, using PETRA-IV as a representative example. A Vlasov solver, multi-bunch particle tracking, and analytical calculations in normalized phase space are combined to study the coupled-bunch mode spectrum, the nonlinear incoherent tune spread, and the associated Landau damping. Particle-tracking simulations show that the space-charge-induced tune spread can provide sufficient Landau damping to stabilize higher-order head-tail modes. Landau stability diagrams constructed from the analytical tune spread of a frozen bi-Gaussian beam predict the stabilization of these higher-order modes, in agreement with the tracking simulations. These results demonstrate the important role of direct space charge in transverse coupled-bunch dynamics. The analysis framework developed here can also be extended to collective-instability studies in both electron and hadron accelerators.2026-09-03T12:42:14ZChao Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03479v1Dependence of self-injected bunch parameters on the plasma density gradient and laser pulse amplitude at LWFA in a conical plasma channel2026-09-03T07:36:51ZLaser wakefield acceleration (LWFA) is an advanced method of high gradient acceleration of charged particles with wakefield excited in plasma by laser pulse. A distinctive feature of this method is the ability to create and accelerate so-called self-injected bunches with unique parameters - charge, energy, emittance, and geometric dimensions - without the need for an external injector of the required bunches for their subsequent acceleration to higher energies. Self-injected bunches emerge due to the plasma electrons trapping by the excited wakefield (self-injection phenomenon). For many applications, self-injected bunches can be used directly in relevant experiments. In this paper the dependence of the self-injected bunch parameters on the laser pulse amplitude and longitudinal gradient of plasma density in tapered plasma channel is investigated using numerical simulation with the WarpX code. At the laser amplitude $a_0=E_0(m_{e0}cω/e)^{-1}=3.6$ in a conical channel with the radius decreasing from $4.0\,c/ω_{pe}$ to $2.16\,c/ω_{pe}$ and with the plasma density increasing linearly from $n_e=2.61\cdot10^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$ at the channel entrance to $3n_e$ at the exit, a self-injected bunch is obtained with the charge $32.1\,μ$C/m, the mean longitudinal momentum $111.9\,m_ec$, the length $5.10\,μ$m, the area $5.3\,μ$m$^2$, the transverse emittance $1.6\cdot10^{-2}$ mm$\cdot$mrad.2026-09-03T07:36:51Z7 pages, 9 figuresD. S. BondarV. I. MaslovI. N. Onishchenkohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19551v2Photoemission from Semi-Infinite Crystals: First-Principles Scattering States and Quantitative Ag(111) Validation2026-09-02T19:06:02ZPhotoemission is an escape problem, yet first-principles calculations usually trap the electron in a periodic box. We present a parameter-free \emph{ab initio} framework that removes this artificial boundary by constructing open scattering states for semi-infinite crystal-vacuum interfaces from Wannier Hamiltonians and Green-function embedding. The method gives continuum-normalized time-reversed LEED final states with microscopic quasiparticle attenuation. For Ag(111), it predicts absolute quantum efficiency, vectorial photoemission, and mean transverse energy on the experimental scale.2026-07-21T20:11:33ZTo be submitted to Physical Review LettersTyler WuTruman IdsoSiddharth KarkareTomás Ariashttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02877v1Controlling a digital twin of the CEBAF injector from EPICS2026-09-02T17:56:10ZThe Experimental and Instrumental Control System EPICS is used to control magnets and to read data from diagnostic devices in the CEBAF accelerator. We describe a prototype system where an EPICS installation, local on a laptop or Raspberry Pi, controls beam optics simulations. They can be running on the same computer or on a separate computer connected via the network. The prototype focuses on modeling and controlling the moderately complex injector beam line of CEBAF, which only comprises a few dozen magnets and beam monitors.2026-09-02T17:56:10Z16 pages, 6 figuresJude DoredantVolker Ziemannhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09176v2Implementation and Deployment of an Injection Tuning Tool Using Bayesian Optimization at the SuperKEKB Accelerator2026-09-02T13:50:19ZAs of July 2025, the SuperKEKB accelerator, which collides 7 GeV electrons with 4 GeV positrons to abundantly produce particles such as B mesons and tau leptons, holds the world record for the highest instantaneous luminosity. Continuous operation and upgrades are underway to achieve even higher luminosities. Maintaining a high instantaneous luminosity requires sustaining high beam currents in the storage rings, which in turn demands efficient beam injection from the injector. In particular, a high injection efficiency, defined as the ratio of the beam current successfully accumulated in the ring to the current delivered from the beam transport line, must be ensured. In the present study, we developed a tool to automate the injection tuning process using Bayesian optimization, a machine-learning-based technique, in order to improve the injection efficiency. During test operations conducted in November-December 2024, this tool successfully enhanced the injection efficiency by up to 32%.2025-10-10T09:19:22Z10 pages, 15 figures. Accepted for publication in Physical Review Accelerators and BeamsShinnosuke KatoGaku Mitsuka10.1103/g523-xdgfhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02070v1Rapid Mapping of Photocathode Quantum Efficiency: A Magnetized Electron Beam Imaging Approach2026-09-02T03:55:24ZQuantum efficiency (QE) is a key property of photocathodes, and its uniformity is essential for producing high-brightness electron beams. Cathode imaging provides an \textit{in-situ} and real-time approach for QE mapping, but in RF guns, a high charge per bunch is often needed to obtain a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio. Under such conditions, space charge effects can significantly degrade the imaging resolution and may even make point-to-point cathode imaging ineffective. In this paper, we propose a novel cathode imaging method based on a magnetized electron beam. Its feasibility is examined through theoretical analysis and beam dynamics simulations. The results show that the proposed method enables point-to-point cathode imaging in the ten picocoulomb charge regime. For a 10 pC, 3ps beam with a cathode magnetic field of 1200 Gauss, simulations indicate an imaging resolution of 11 um, representing nearly an order-of-magnitude improvement over the non-magnetized beam method.2026-09-02T03:55:24ZYihan LiuLianmin ZhengYingchao Duhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12979v2Evidence for Umklapp electron scattering emission from metal photocathodes2026-08-31T22:49:36ZComparison of the measured spectral emission properties of single-crystal Cu(001) and W(111) photocathodes to established photoemission theories reveal evidence for an additional one photon emission process predominantly affecting electron emission near and below the photoemission threshold. This additional photoemission process is postulated to be due to a momentum-resonant Franck-Condon mechanism mediated by inelastic Umklapp electron scattering. An initial first-principles simulation of this emission process (involving the electron thermal effective mass, the inelastic electron mean free path at the vacuum level, and the number of Fermi surfaces in the metal), when combined with a direct one-step band emission model, is consistent with the measured spectral dependencies of both the quantum efficiency and mean transverse energy of electron photoemission from the two single-crystal metal photocathodes.2026-04-14T17:12:46Z25 pages 5 figures, Accepted for publication in APS Open Science as Regular ArticleI-J. ShanL. A. AngeloniW. Andreas Schroederhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00289v1A particle-in-cell model of beam dynamics in a dielectric wall accelerator2026-08-31T19:34:48ZDielectric wall accelerator (DWA) technology has been proposed as a compact, cost-effective alternative to rf accelerators for proton therapy, but its beam dynamics and practical feasibility remain relatively unexplored. In this work, we derive a three-dimensional, time-dependent axisymmetric electromagnetic field model from a prescribed on-wall excitation and implement it as stacked external field elements in the particle-in-cell code Warp. In the absence of experimental DWA beam-transport data, the implementation is cross-checked against a previously developed linear optics model in TRANSOPTR using deliberately idealized beam conditions. Strong agreement is observed between the two models in this regime. The models are then compared for larger transverse and longitudinal emittances, bunch charges up to 1x10^8e, and beam parameters representative of a low-energy proton source. The PIC simulations remain consistent with the linear predictions over much of the investigated range, while also identifying wall interactions, longitudinal phase-space distortions, and space-charge induced aberrations. The PIC model represents an intermediate step between linear optics and combined, geometry-specific electromagnetic and particle-transport simulations. It resolves particle-level transport and beam self-fields while retaining an analytical field description that can be varied without committing to a particular DWA structure. More detailed effects may be introduced through externally generated field data or empirical corrections, including models of cell-to-cell coupling, providing a practical basis for increasingly realistic DWA field and beamline studies.2026-08-31T19:34:48Z27 pages, 7 figuresChristopher M. LundPaul M. JungJamiel NasserMorgan J. MaherJulien BancheriChau Giang BuiThomas PlancheRick BaartmanJan Seuntjenshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00212v1Cryogenic Enhancement of Electron Spin Polarization from a Strained GaAs/GaAsP Superlattice Photocathode2026-08-31T18:23:24ZWe report electron spin polarization of 95.0 +/- 0.8 (stat) +/- 2.4 (sys)% from a strained GaAs/GaAsP superlattice photocathode grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) and cooled to dry-ice temperature (195 K). We achieved this polarization with 97.8% circularly polarized excitation light and a quantum efficiency of 0.7% at the peak polarization wavelength. This measurement exceeds the values of previously reported GaAs-based photocathode polarizations, which have clustered near 92% for two decades. We vary the temperature of the cathode and measure the polarization and quantum-efficiency spectra at 295 K, 273 K, 195 K, and 77 K. The polarization rises from 91.2(1)% at 295 K to its maximum at 195 K, while the spectral peak shifts from 775 nm to 739 nm (78 meV) over the full temperature range, tracking the widening band gap. The spectra probe two depolarization mechanisms: a thermalized transport channel that is suppressed on cooling, and energy-dependent hot-electron relaxation that persists and sets the low-temperature saturation. The polarization recovers after a full cooling and warmup cycle and is stable while the quantum efficiency decays, which disfavors surface energy filtering as the origin of the gain. These results indicate that modest cooling to 195 K, for which dry ice suffices, is a practical route to higher-polarization GaAs-based electron sources.2026-08-31T18:23:24Z7 pages, 3 figures; Supplemental Material contains 8 pages, 3 figures, and 1 table. Ancillary files contain the measured spectra and a Jupyter notebook that reproduces figures and values, also archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22212862Matt GrauColin KirkGreg BlumeJohn HillSushil PoudelAlimohammed KachwalaMarcy StutzmanJoseph Michael GramesSylvain MarsillacMatt Poelkerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19983v5A Linear Collider Vision for the Future of Particle Physics2026-08-31T17:57:19ZIn this paper we review the physics opportunities at linear $e^+e^-$ colliders with a special focus on high centre-of-mass energies and beam polarisation, take a fresh look at the various accelerator technologies available or under development and, for the first time, discuss how a facility first equipped with a technology mature today could be upgraded with technologies of tomorrow to reach much higher energies and/or luminosities. In addition, we will discuss detectors and alternative collider modes, as well as opportunities for beyond-collider experiments and R\&D facilities as part of a linear collider facility (LCF). The material of this paper will support all plans for $e^+e^-$ linear colliders and additional opportunities they offer, independently of technology choice or proposed site, as well as R\&D for advanced accelerator technologies. This joint perspective on the physics goals, early technologies and upgrade strategies has been developed by the LCVision team based on an initial discussion at LCWS2024 in Tokyo and a follow-up at the LCVision Community Event at CERN in January 2025. It heavily builds on decades of achievements of the global linear collider community, in particular in the context of CLIC and ILC.2025-03-25T18:09:46ZCommunity document for EPPSU, major updates of several sections, in particular the global interpretation section v5: fixed mistake in H->inv projections in Tab 6 and Tab 11, added section 2.4 on expected event numbersH. AbramowiczE. AdliF. AlharthiM. Almanza-SotoM. M. AltakachW. AltmannshoferS. Ampudia CastelazoD. Angal-KalininJ. A. AnguianoR. B. ApplebyO. ApsimonA. ArbeyF. ArcoO. ArqueroA. AryshevS. AsaiD. AttieJ. L. Avila-JimenezH. BaerJ. A. BaggerY. BaiI. R. BaileyC. BalazsP. BambadeT. BarklowJ. BaudotP. BechtleT. BehnkeA. B. BelleriveS. BelomestnykhY. BenhammouJ. Berenguer-AntequeraM. BergerM. BerggrenM. BertucciM. BesanconD. BettP. -C. BhatT. BiekoetterS. BilanishviliB. BilkiB. BilkiJ. Bjorklund SvenssonV. M. BjellandC. BlanchB. BliewertM. BoehlerS. BoogertM. BoronatV. BoudryD. BourilkovI. BozovicJ. BraathenJ. E. BrauC. BreuningJ. -C. BrientI. BrockB. BrudnowskiK. BuesserE. BulyakP. N. BurrowsG. BurtO. CakirA. CaldwellA. C. CanbayF. G. CelibertoE. CenniI. ChaikovskaR. ChehabG. ChenJ. B. B. ChenT. ChikamatsuV. CilentoP. ColasM. ComanL. CornerF. CornetF. Cornet-GomezF. CorriveauR. CorsiniJ. CvachR. D'ArcyC. DamerellA. DasS. DasuJ. de BlasE. Del CoreM. DemarteauH. DenizliR. DermisekA. DharS. DittmaierF. DjurabekovaE. M. DoneganiA. DoyleP. DrobniakT. A. du PreeB. DudarH. Duran YildizG. DurieuxJ. DuttaS. EasoG. EckerlinU. EinhausC. EmmaE. EsareyD. EsperanteD. EspriuL. R EvansJ. FarmerA. Faus GolfeM. FernandezJ. C. Fernandez-OrtegaM. FormelaA. FormentiL. J. ForresterB. FosterN. FourchesM. C. FouzA. FreitasC. D. FuK. FujiiJ. FujimotoB. FuksJ. FusterN. Fuster-MartinezM. GabelmannF. GaedeM. GallettiE. GalloS. GanjourM. V. GarzelliR. L. GengS. GessnerI. D. GialamasB. GimenoJ. GoldsteinM. GoncerzA. J. GonsalvesF. J. GonzalezD. Gonzalez-IglesiasS. GoriJ. GramesP. GrannisL. GrayG. GrenierH. GulerH. E. HaberK. HamaguchiN. HamannO. HartbrichN. M. HartmanG. HuetsiS. HeinemeyerG. HeinrichC. HenselK. HidakaS. HiroseA. H. HoangM. J. HoganW. HollikY. HoriiR. HosokawaS. HuangD. HyndsM. I. IdzikS. IguroY. IiyamaK. IkematsuA. IrlesA. IshikawaM. IshinoI. P. IvanovY. IwashitaM. JacewiczR. JaramilloD. JeansC. JingR. M JonesW. KaabiM. KaganJ. KalinowskiD. K KalvikJ. KaminskiS. KanemuraK. KannikeA. KaramY. KatoK. KawagoeD. KaeferL. KennedyJ. KerstenS. A. KhanV. A. KhozeW. KilianJ. KlamkaP. KluitK. KongP. KoppenburgA. KorsunA. V. KotwalS. KramlK. KruegerK. KuboT. KuboM. KucharczykS. KudayA. KumarN. KumarM. KurataY. KuriharaM. KurikiJ. KvasnickaK. KyoyaI. LaktinehA. LatinaF. LeDiberderA. LevyM. LiepeC. A. LindstroemJ. ListB. ListM. LitosV. N. LitvinenkoA. Lopez-VirtoX. LuT. LuoM. LupbergerB. MadisonT. MadlenerJ. MaedaF. MahmoudiE. MainaN. MajernikR. Margraf-O'NealT. W. MarkiewiczP. Martin-LunaA. MartensV. J. MartinL. MarzolaV. I. MaslovK. T. MatchevS. MatsumotoK. MawatariJ. P. MarquezM. M. MuehlleitnerA. McIlvennyP. A. McIntoshK. MekalaD. MeliniF. MeloniA. MenandezS. MichizonoK. MimasuV. MirallesW. MitaroffV. A. MitsouL. MonacoG. Moortgat-PickM. Moreno-LlcerT. MoriJ. M. MoronS. MortonD. MoyaM. MulderP. MunbodhH. MurayamaE. MusumeciV. V. MytrochenkoN. NagataE. NagyT. NakadaJ. NakajimaK. NakamuraE. A. NanniE. NardiS. NaritaM. T. Nunez Pardo de VeraM. NojiriD. NtounisA. OdyO. M. OgreidT. OhlY. OkadaC. OleariM. OlvegardM. OmetT. OmoriY. OnelH. OnoW. OotaniC. OreroJ. OsborneK. OsterbergJ. OsterhoffM. OuchemhouQ. OuyangS. Pagan GrisoR. PaparellaS. C. ParkJ. PataJ. R. PattersonR. PoeschlF. PenaL. K Pedraza-MotavitaM. E. PeskinF. PilatP. PiotS. PlaetzerI. PolakW. PorodK. PotamianosC. T. PotterP. PouloseJ. G. PowerD. ProtopopescuH. R. QiJ. Rabara BaileyA. RacioppiM. RaidalJ. P. RalstonA. RastogiL. ReichenbachL. ReichweinL. ReinaJ. ReuterF. RichardS. RiemannR. A. RimmerT. RobensA. RobsonG. RodrigoC. S. RoganJ. RojoM. Q. RuanS. RudrabhatlaA. Ruiz JimenoT. SaekiH. SakaiY. SakakiF. SalvatoreT. SanukiS. SasikumarT SchoernerA. ScheinkerC. B. SchroederS. SchroederI. SchulthessM. SchumacherA. SchwartzmanY. SeiyaA. SenolH. SertD. SertoreA. SeryiT. ShidaraK. SjobakI. SmiljanicS. SpannagelM. SpiraM. StanitzkiS. StapnesD. StoreyJ. StrubeS. SuA. SubbaA. SubbaT. SueharaH. SugawaraK. SugizakiZ. SunR. SzafronT. TakahashiT. TakeshitaT. TauchiG. TaylorN. TerunumaD. TerzaniT. TeubnerJ. TianJ. TimmermansM. TitovR. Tomas GarciaT. TongJ. M. TorndalM. TrautweinA. TricoliK. TsumuraB. TuchmingD. TucklerI. Turk CakirM. TytgatA. UklejaC. ValleeR. Van KootenJ. van TilborgA. VauthM. VellascoC. VernieriL. VerraM. Vicente Barreto PintoI. VidakovicH. VideauE. ViklundI. VilaM. VillaplanaM. VosN. VukasinovicN. WalkerK. Wandall-ChristensenY. WangB. F. L. WardZ. WasT. WatanabeN. K. WatsonG. WeigleinJ. D. WellsH. WennloefM. WenskatS. WesthoffJ. W. WetzelA. P. WhiteP. H. WilliamsM. WilliamsG. W. WilsonM. WingM. WinterA. WinterT. WojtonJ. C. WoodW. WuenschX. XiaK. YagyuK. YamamotoY. YamamotoH. YamamotoA. YamamotoS. YamashitaM. YamauchiK. YokoyaM. YoshiokaJ. ZalesakA. F. ZarneckiK. ZembaczynskiD. ZerwasJ. ZhangY. ZhangW. ZhangY. -M. ZhongM. ZielinskiM. Zobovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00094v1Modernization and Statistical Validation of a Multilayer TRIM.SP Code for Low-Energy Muon and Ion Implantation2026-08-31T14:01:24ZWe describe the staged modernization of a local multilayer TRIM.SP implementation, denoted TRIM.SP-NL. The work included behavior-preserving refactoring, correction of localized bookkeeping and initialization defects, support for more than five elements per layer, reproducible build modes, and a runtime-selectable random-number-generator (RNG) interface. The RANLUX RNG remains the default reference backend, while PCG32 and xoshiro256** provide faster alternatives without changing the input-deck format. The code validation combined exact regression testing with statistical comparisons over 13 representative target multilayer configurations, comprising 143 energy-configuration points per backend and 429 simulations in total. Across the test suite, PCG32 and xoshiro256** reduced runtime by factors of 1.98 and 2.01, respectively. The implanted, backscattered, and transmitted fractions, as well as the mean implantation depths, range straggling, and representative depth profiles showed no systematic RNG dependence. Together with a Node.js-based graphical interface for setup, scans, and result collection, the Fortran engine forms the open-source TRIM.SP-NL Workbench.2026-08-31T14:01:24Z9 pages, 5 figuresZaher SalmanRyan M. L. McFaddenThomas Prokschahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30455v1Magnetizing nonlinear plasma wakefields for positron acceleration2026-08-31T08:42:40ZIt is known that only a narrow plasma wakefield sliver in the electron-beam-driven blowout regime suits positron acceleration. Using 3D simulations, we show that matching the cyclotron frequency $ω_{c}$ with the plasma frequency $ω_{p}$ forms a stable electron column on axis, expanding the suitable phase space for positron acceleration sizably. For a plasma density $n_p = 10^{16}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ in a 35 T field, the interval expands 4.3 times, and a witness positron beam gains 100--150 MeV over 6 cm ($1.6$--$2.5$~GeV/m) with a 92\% capture rate.2026-08-31T08:42:40ZYung-Kun LiuPisin ChenChing-En LinSpencer GessnerBernhard Hidding