https://arxiv.org/api/Bym4bYPYisNRQgv45NSXEFxpaqs2026-06-13T13:35:13Z101763015http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02452v1Symplectic capacities of $S^1$-invariant dynamically convex domains in $\mathbb{R}^4$2026-06-01T16:24:49ZIn this paper, we prove that all normalized symplectic capacities agree for dynamically convex domains in $\mathbb{C}^2$ that are invariant under any Hamiltonian $S^1$-action isotopic to the Hopf diagonal action. We also give necessary and sufficient conditions for $S^1$-invariant domains to be dynamically convex.2026-06-01T16:24:49ZArthur MeloVinicius G. B. RamosAlejandro Vicentehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02409v1Framed bordism of Lagrangian homotopy spheres via generating functions2026-06-01T15:52:47ZThis note combines a result of Bökstedt and Waldhausen concerning the so-called derivative map on tubes with the existence theorem for generating functions of tube type for nearby Lagrangian homotopy spheres due to Abouzaid, Courte, Guillermou and Kragh to obtain a restriction on the smooth structure of nearby Lagrangian homotopy spheres. Concretely, if a homotopy $n$-sphere $L$ admits a Lagrangian embedding in the cotangent bundle of some other homotopy $n$-sphere $M$, then the difference $[L]-[M]$ in $θ_n/bP_{n+1}$ is a multiple of the Hopf element $η\in π^1_s$. In particular it follows that $[L]-[M]$ is 2-torsion in $θ_n/bP_{n+1}$, hence if $n$ is even then $L\# L$ is diffeomorphic to $M \# M$. As another application, if a homotopy $8$-sphere $L$ admits a Lagrangian embedding in $T^*S^8$, then $L$ is diffeomorphic to $S^8$. The results presented in this note are subsumed by a joint work with Abouzaid, Courte and Kragh which treats the general case in which $M$ is an arbitrary smooth manifold. When $M$ is a homotopy sphere the situation is significantly simpler and the purpose of this note is to give a concise exposition of the main result in this special case.2026-06-01T15:52:47ZMinor edit of a 2020 preprint, to appear in the proceedings of the 2025 Georgia International Topology ConferenceDaniel Alvarez-Gavelahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12471v5New geometric structures on 3-manifolds: surgery and generalized geometry2026-06-01T07:20:19ZCosymplectic and normal almost contact structures are analogues of symplectic and complex structures that can be defined on 3-manifolds. Their existence imposes strong topological constraints. Generalized geometry offers a natural common generalization of these two structures: $B_3$-generalized complex structures. We prove that any closed orientable 3-manifold admits such a structure, which can be chosen to be stable, that is, generically cosymplectic up to generalized diffeomorphism.2024-02-19T19:18:03Z15 pages, to appear in Advances in MathematicsAdv. Math. 500 (2026), article 111062Joan PortiRoberto Rubio10.1016/j.aim.2026.111062http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19936v3Wonderful Compactification of a Cartan Subalgebra of a Semisimple Lie Algebra2026-06-01T06:17:22ZLet $\mathfrak h$ be a Cartan subalgebra of a complex semisimple Lie algebra $\mathfrak g.$ We define a compactification $\bar {\mathfrak h}$ of $\mathfrak h$, which is analogous to the closure $\bar H$ of the corresponding maximal torus $H$ in the adjoint group of $\mathfrak g$ in its wonderful compactification, which was introduced and studied by De Concini and Procesi \cite{DCP}. We observe that $\bar {\mathfrak h}$ is a matroid Schubert variety and prove that the irreducible components of the boundary $\bar {\mathfrak h} - \mathfrak h$ of $\mathfrak h$ are divisors indexed by root system data. We prove that $\bar {\mathfrak h}$ is a normal variety and find an affine paving of $\bar {\mathfrak h},$ where the strata are given by the orbits of $\mathfrak h.$ We show that the strata of $\bar {\mathfrak h}$ correspond bijectively to subspaces of the corresponding Coxeter hyperplane arrangement studied by Orlik and Solomon, and prove that the associated posets are isomorphic. As a consequence, we express the Betti numbers of $\bar {\mathfrak h}$ in terms of well-known combinatorial invariants in the classical cases. We show that the Weyl group $W$ acts on $\bar {\mathfrak h}$, and describe $H^{\bullet}(\bar {\mathfrak h}, \mathbb C)$ as a representation of $W$, and compute the cup product for $H^{\bullet}(\bar {\mathfrak h}, \mathbb Z)$.2024-11-29T18:51:58ZPublished versionSam EvensYu Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01749v1Towards a Floer theory for Mars I -- Twisted Zeeman systems2026-06-01T06:12:09ZIn this article we study periodic orbits of an electron attracted by a proton subject to Lorentz, electric, and Euler forces where each of them is allowed to depend periodically on time. This setup is motivated by the elliptic restricted three-body-problem where the Lorentz force corresponds to Coriolis force, the Coulomb force is replaced by the gravitational force, and the electric force of an external source is a combination of centrifugal forces and gravitational forces of other bodies. This is a singular version of a Euler-Hamilton system as discussed in [FW26b]. The singularity is due to collisions of the electron with the proton, respectively of two masses. Due to the possibility of collisions this problem has to be regularized. We show how periodic collisional solutions of this problem can be detected variationally in a non-local Lagrangian setup as well as in a non-local Hamiltonian setup.2026-06-01T06:12:09Z57 pages, 3 figuresUrs FrauenfelderJoa Weberhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10867v2Explicitly Computing with Fukaya Categories of Surfaces with Boundary2026-06-01T02:40:31ZFukaya categories are deep and rich invariants of symplectic manifolds which are notoriously difficult to compute explicitly. In the case of surfaces, however, the situation is simple, combinatorial,and is very well understood (at least by experts). In this expository paper we will give an introduction with many examples to welcome newcomers to the area and hopefully equip them with the tools to independently compute Fukaya categories of surfaces.2025-10-13T00:18:54ZBased on a talk given at the 2025 AWM WiSCon Special Session. Major changes to figures and examples since the previous version. Comments welcomeChris Grossackhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02501v2Non-squeezing and capacities for some calibrated geometries2026-05-31T23:29:38ZIt was shown by Barron--Shafiee that an analogue of Gromov's non-squeezing theorem holds for affine maps which preserve a power $ω^k$ of the symplectic form $ω$ on $\mathbb{R}^{2n}$. In the present paper, we state and prove in two ways an improved version of their result which is closer to the classical affine non-squeezing theorem. One proof closely follows their argument, and the other consists of a reduction to the classical case by showing that, except for the case $k = n$, every linear map that preserves $ω^k$ must be symplectic or anti-symplectic.
We then study when a calibration form satisfies an (affine) non-squeezing theorem. Particular focus is given to the special Lagrangian case, where we are able to establish an affine non-squeezing theorem for the holomorphic volume form $Ω= dz^1 \wedge \cdots \wedge dz^n$. The classical symplectic affine rigidity theorem states roughly that a non-singular linear map is symplectic or anti-symplectic if and only if it preserves the "capacity" of every ellipsoid. We establish an affine special Lagrangian version of this theorem under the necessary assumption that the map is complex-linear. We also discuss some natural future questions.2025-10-02T19:09:24Z32 pages, 1 figure. Version 2: Following referee's reports: we added references, changed some notation, clarified some statements, and improved the result of Theorem 5.10, because the complex-linearity assumption is in fact necessary. Final version, to appear in "Mathematical Physics, Analysis, and Geometry"Kain DineenSpiro Karigiannishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00693v1The kei word metric on the transvection group and its unit ball2026-05-30T12:04:26ZWe define a bi-invariant word metric on a group using keis. We discuss whether such a word metric is trivial or non-trivial in various examples coming from group theory, dynamical systems, as well as complex and symplectic geometry.2026-05-30T12:04:26Z24 pagesUrs FrauenfelderLei Zhaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00687v1A topological classification of generating functions2026-05-30T11:49:51ZFrom a generating function for a Legendrian in a $1$-jet bundle, we may extract the following topological information: (1) a trivialization of the stable Gauss map, (2) the sheaf of sub-level-set stable cohomotopies, and (3) an identification of the microlocalization of the latter with the J-homomorphism image of the former. Here we show that in fact (1), (2), (3) completely classify generating functions up to the classical equivalence relations of stabilization and fiberwise diffeomorphism.2026-05-30T11:49:51ZComments welcome!Sylvain CourteVivek Shendehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08404v2Instanton construction of the mapping cone Thom-Smale complex2026-05-29T17:00:09ZThe wedge by a smooth closed $\ell$-form induces the mapping cone de Rham cochain complex. This complex is quasi-isomorphic to the mapping cone Thom-Smale cochain complex. In this paper, we give a purely analytic instanton construction of the mapping cone Thom-Smale complex. More precisely, for a Morse function with the transversality condition on a closed oriented Riemannian manifold, we construct an instanton cochain complex using the eigenspaces of the mapping cone Laplacian deformed by the Morse function and two parameters. One parameter is inherited from the classical Witten deformation. The other parameter points to the cup product issue affecting the mapping cone situation. As the main result, we prove that our instanton complex is cochain isomorphic to the topologically constructed mapping cone Thom-Smale complex.2026-03-09T14:01:00Zv2: Corrected some typos. Clarified main technology and background information in Section 1. v1: 33 pages. Comments are welcomeHao Zhuanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31422v1Weinstein manifolds as cotangent buildings2026-05-29T15:21:22ZWe introduce the framework of cotangent buildings to complement and refine that of Weinstein handlebodies. While Weinstein handlebodies are suitable for a ``bottom-up" analysis of the Weinstein structure, cotangent buildings also enable a ``top down" analysis. Further, cotangent buildings include a precise control over the interaction of any subcollection of the various building blocks, each of which is modeled on the cotangent bundle of a manifold with corners. Our main result is that any Weinstein manifold is Weinstein homotopic to one admitting the structure of a cotangent building.2026-05-29T15:21:22ZDaniel Álvarez-GavelaYakov EliashbergDavid Nadlerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29046v2The Moyal cohomology of the N=1 spinning particle2026-05-28T23:40:04ZThe Batalin-Fradkin-Vilkovisky formalism studies a differential graded symplectic supermanifold whose cohomology vanishes in negative degree. This hypothesis is violated by the N=1 spinning particle arXiv:1605.04762; its cohomology is nontrivial in all negative degrees. Replacing the Poisson bracket by the Moyal bracket has the effect of eliminating these cohomology classes.2026-03-30T22:25:51ZMany revisions and corrections from first version, and added discussion of relationship of these results to the BFV formalism. 13 pagesEzra Getzlerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14604v7Recovering contact forms from boundary data2026-05-28T23:08:16ZLet $X$ be a compact smooth manifold with boundary. The paper deals with contact $1$-forms $β$ on $X$, whose Reeb vector fields $v_β$ admit Lyapunov functions $f$.
We tackle the question: how to recover $X$ and $β$ from the appropriate data along the boundary $\partial X$? We describe such boundary data and prove that they allow for a reconstruction of the pair $(X, β)$, up to a diffeomorphism of $X$. We use the term ``holography" for the reconstruction. We say that objects or structures inside $X$ are {\it holographic}, if they can be reconstructed from their $v_β$-flow induced ``shadows" on the boundary $\partial X$.
We also introduce numerical invariants that measure how ``wrinkled" the boundary $\partial X$ is with respect to the $v_β$-flow and study their holographic properties under the contact forms preserving embeddings of equidimensional contact manifolds with boundary. We get some ``non-squeezing results" about such contact embedding, which are reminiscent of Gromov's non-squeezing theorem in symplectic geometry.2023-09-26T01:22:32Z46 pages, 3 figuresGabriel Katzhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01103v2On Quantum Indeterminacy2026-05-28T17:41:54ZWe introduce a geometric formulation of quantum indeterminacy from which the standard uncertainty inequalities emerge as necessary consequences. Our approach is based on convex geometry in phase space and on methods from symplectic topology, and does not rely on statistical descriptors such as variances or covariances. Instead, we associate to empirical position and momentum data with convex bodies whose mutual relations encode the fundamental constraints of quantum mechanics. The central tools are h-polar duality and symplectic capacities, which provide intrinsic, coordinate-free bounds on admissible phase-space configurations. Within this framework, the Robertson-Schrodinger inequalities arise naturally as manifestations of deeper geometric and topological principles. This perspective suggests that quantum indeterminacy is not primarily a statistical phenomenon, but rather a structural property of phase space governed by symplectic covariance. The results thus provide a unified and conceptually transparent foundation for the uncertainty principle.2026-05-01T21:18:25ZFirst versionMaurice de Gossonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1910.14466v2Poisson geometrical aspects of the Tomita-Takesaki modular theory2026-05-28T15:32:14ZWe investigate some genuine Poisson geometric objects in the modular theory of an arbitrary von Neumann algebra $\mathfrak{M}$. Specifically, for any standard form realization $(\mathfrak{M},\mathcal{H},J,\mathcal{P})$, we find a canonical foliation of the Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$, whose leaves are Banach manifolds that are weakly immersed into~$\mathcal{H}$, thereby endowing $\mathcal{H}$ with a richer Banach manifold structure to be denoted by~$\widetilde{\mathcal{H}}$. We also find that $\widetilde{\mathcal{H}}$ has the structure of a Banach-Lie groupoid $\widetilde{\mathcal{H}}\rightrightarrows\mathfrak{M}_*^+$ which is isomorphic to the action groupoid $\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{M})\ast\mathfrak{M}_*^+\rightrightarrows\mathfrak{M}_*^+$ defined by the natural action of the Banach-Lie groupoid of partial isometries $\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{M})\rightrightarrows\mathcal{L}(\mathfrak{M})$ on the positive cone in the predual $\mathfrak{M}_*^+$, where $\mathcal{L}(\mathfrak{M})$ is the projection lattice of $\mathfrak{M}$. There is also a presymplectic form $\widetilde{\boldsymbolω}\inΩ^2(\widetilde{\mathcal{H}})$ that comes from the scalar product of $\mathcal{H}$ and is multiplicative in the usual sense of finite-dimensional Lie groupoid theory. We further explore some aspects of reduction theory for the groupoid endowed with the multiplicative presymplectic form $(\widetilde{\mathcal{H}},\widetilde{\boldsymbolω})\rightrightarrows \mathfrak{M}_*^+$, including the Poisson manifold structures of its orbits and the foliation defined by the degeneracy kernel of the presymplectic form~$\widetilde{\boldsymbolω}$.2019-10-31T13:46:50Z67 pagesDaniel BeltitaAnatol Odzijewicz