https://arxiv.org/api/Gl/TaAAjJADEHKpZiLwHxryT5ig2026-06-22T01:16:58Z4927770515http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19310v1A Fourier-Free Density-Increment Proof of Roth's Theorem2026-05-19T03:45:29ZWe give an elementary, Fourier-free proof of Roth's theorem. The proof follows Roth's original density-increment strategy, but replaces the usual Fourier-analytic step with a direct combinatorial argument involving averages over sub-progressions.2026-05-19T03:45:29Z10 pages, no figuresMark Lewkohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10356v2On the Existence of Integers with at Most 3 Prime Factors Between Every Pair of Consecutive Squares2026-05-19T01:32:57ZWe prove an explicit analogue of Legendre's conjecture for almost primes. Namely, for every integer $n \geq 1$, the interval $(n^2,(n+1)^2)$ contains an integer having at most $3$ prime factors, counted with multiplicity. This improves the previous best result of Dudek and Johnston, who showed that every such interval contains an integer with at most $4$ prime factors. The proof is divided into two ranges. For $n^2 \leq 10^{31}$, we use prior computational results on primes in short intervals between consecutive squares, together with explicit bounds on maximal prime gaps. For $n^2 > 10^{31}$, we give a sieve-theoretic argument with explicit constants, adapting Richert's logarithmic weights to intervals between consecutive squares and employing an explicit linear sieve of Bordignon, Johnston, and Starichkova.2026-03-11T03:10:12Z15 pages, no figures. Revised version with expository changesPeter J. Campbellhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08818v3Values of algebraic functions at Liouville numbers2026-05-19T01:18:31ZIn 1953 LeVeque proved the existence of $U_m$-numbers by showing that for some specially defined Liouville number $λ$, the $m$th root $λ^{1/m}$ is in $U_m$. In this article we study the following question: let $u$ be an algebraic function of degree $m$ and $λ$ a Liouville number; under which conditions is $u(λ)$ a $U_m$-number? We consider a more refined notion of $\mathcal{L}$-numbers, and show that, under very general assumptions, an algebraic function of degree $m$ takes $U_m$-values at all $\mathcal{L}$-numbers.2026-04-09T23:17:42ZUpdated following referee's suggestionsYuri BiluDiego Marqueshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19177v1A formula of counting divisors in integers rings: a generalization of the divisor function $d_0(n)$2026-05-18T22:58:22ZIn this paper we establish a formal connection between the structure of ideals in integers rings and the theory of additive combinatorics. For integers rings with cyclic class groups, we prove a structural theorem demonstrating that every non-zero ideal can be decomposed into a maximal principal part and a product of ideals whose total length is bounded by the Davenport constant. With this decomposition we find divisors for generators of the ideal $I=(α, β)$. The central result of this work is the derivation of a closed formula using character theory over finite abelian groups to count the exact number of zero-sum subsequences of a given sequence. Under the established correspondence between principal ideals and zero-sum sequences, this formula provides a precise counting of the principal ideal divisors of any given ideal, and therefore counting common divisors of generators of the ideal $I=(α,β)$. This result constitutes a natural generalization of the classical divisor function $d_0(n)$ from unique factorization domains to any Dedekind domain with a finite class group. Finally, we characterize irreducible elements in $\mathcal{O}_K$ based on the counting of these zero-sum subsequences.2026-05-18T22:58:22Z10 pages, 0 figures, researchÁngel Martínez-AvelarMario Pineda-Ruelashttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19165v1On nonconvex constellations among primes II: (458,3240)2026-05-18T22:40:26ZExtending our work on the $k$-tuple conjecture, we previously applied those methods to the Engelsma counterexamples (narrow constellations) of length $J=459$ and span $|s|=3242$. Here we extend that analysis to the $116$ Engelsma counterexamples of length $J=458$ and $|s|=3240$.
We track the evolution of these $116$ counterexamples from inadmissible driving terms starting in the cycle of gaps ${\mathcal G}(11^\#)$ up through their first appearance in ${\mathcal G}(113^\#)$. We continue developing primorial coordinates for each admissible instance through a breadth-first exhaustive search through ${\mathcal G}(211^\#)$.
Each of the $(458,3240)$ constellations sits inside a $(459,3242)$ constellation, which we call its {\em parent}. We show that no $(458,3240)$ constellation occurs outside of its parent until the cycle ${\mathcal G}(227^\#)$. The early evolution of the $(458,3240)$ constellations is dominated by the evolution of their parents, which we have previously studied.
For each $(458,3240)$-counterexample we calculate its asymptotic relative population, among other constellations of length $J=458$.2026-05-18T22:40:26Z14 pages, 7 figuresFred B. Holthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19105v1Halász theorems for Gaussian ideals in sectors and short intervals2026-05-18T20:47:26ZWe prove a quantitative Halász theorem for multiplicative functions on the nonzero ideals of $\mathbb{Z}[i]$, with bounds controlled by pretentious distance to the Archimedean characters $N^{it}$. We also prove a sectorial analogue: under angular non-pretentiousness, the sum of $f$ over ideals lying in a fixed sector is asymptotically given by the expected proportion of the unrestricted sum. Finally, under angular non-pretentiousness and a non-degeneracy condition on conjugate prime pairs, we prove a sectorial short-interval version of the Halász theorem for annular sectors whose radial thickness tends to infinity. The proof of the sectorial short-interval Halász theorem uses angular Fourier expansion, norm-compression to multiplicative functions on $\mathbb{N}$, and a theorem of Mangerel.2026-05-18T20:47:26Z33 pages, no figuresJan Kuśhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13898v2Upper bounds on gaps between zeros of $L$-functions2026-05-18T19:34:32ZWe prove two unconditional upper bounds on the gaps between ordinates of consecutive non-trivial zeros of a general $L$-function $L(s)$. This extends previous work of Hall and Hayman (2000) on the Riemann zeta-function and work of Siegel (1945) on Dirichlet $L$-functions. Interestingly, we observe that while Hall and Hayman's method gives a sharper estimate when the degree of $L(s)$ is sufficiently small compared to the analytic conductor, Siegel's method does better in the other regime.2025-11-17T20:48:41ZTo appear in Expo. MathTianyu Zhaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19013v1Short Salem polynomials2026-05-18T18:35:07ZWe give a complete classification of all Salem polynomials of length 5. For length 6 we show that all but finitely many Salem polynomials lie in one of 12 infinite families, and subject to Lehmer's Conjecture we give a complete list of the 126 exceptions. We provide a table of short polynomials for all known Salem numbers below the smallest Pisot number.2026-05-18T18:35:07Z21 pages, 4 tablesJames McKeeChris Smythhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18996v1The generalized Montgomery-Hooley formula: A survey2026-05-18T18:14:29ZThis memoir is a survey of theorems and inequalities which have grown out of, and extended, the seminal estimate of Montgomery \cite{HM70} \begin{multline*} V(x,Q)=\sum_{q\le Q}\sum_{\substack{a=1\\ (a,q)=1}}^q \left| ψ(x;q,a) - \frac{x}{φ(q)} \right|^2 \\ = Qx\log x + \textstyle O\big(Qx\log\frac{2x}{Q}\big) + O\big(x^2(\log x)^{-A}\big)., \end{multline*}2026-05-18T18:14:29ZRobert C. Vaughanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18389v5Heavenly elliptic curves over quadratic fields2026-05-18T17:36:51ZAn abelian variety $A/K$ is heavenly at $\ell$ if the extension $K(A[\ell^\infty])/K(μ_{\ell^{\infty}}\!)$ is both pro-$\ell$ and unramified away from $\ell$. It is known that for a fixed quadratic field $K$, the number of $K$-isomorphism classes of heavenly elliptic curves is finite, even running over all primes $\ell$. We prove a complementary result, that for a fixed prime $\ell\geq 7$, there are only finitely many such classes, even running over all quadratic fields. This naturally raises the question of whether to expect a finiteness result when both $K$ and $\ell$ are allowed to vary. We demonstrate similarities in the behavior of heavenly elliptic curves and elliptic curves with complex multiplication, in terms of their Frobenius traces modulo $\ell$. We determine the complete list of heavenly elliptic curves defined over quadratic fields with complex multiplication and with irrational $j$-invariant (up to isomorphism). We include various extensions of our results to higher degree fields and higher-dimensional abelian varieties where possible.2024-10-24T03:01:53Z28 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables; minor corrections in sections 2, 5, 6Cam McLemanChristopher Rasmussenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16240v2Evaluation of two determinants involving $q$-integers2026-05-18T17:28:05ZThe $q$-analogue of an integer $m$ is given by $[m]_q=(1-q^m)/(1-q)$. Let $a$ be an integer, and let $n$ be a positive odd integer. Via discrete Fourier transforms, we establish the following two identities: $$\det\left[\left[\left\lfloor\frac{aj-(a+1)k}n\right\rfloor\right]_q\right]_{1\leqslant j,k\leqslant n}=-\left(\frac{a(a+1)}n\right)q^{(1-3n)/2}$$ and $$\det\left[\left[\left\lceil\frac{(a+1)j-ak}n\right\rceil\right]_q\right]_{1\leqslant j,k\leqslant n}=\left(\frac{a(a+1)}n\right)q^{(n-1)/2},$$ where $(\frac{\cdot}n)$ denotes the Jacobi symbol.2026-05-15T17:48:24Z10 pages. Correct typos and make Theorem 1.3 more generalZhi-Wei Sunhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18676v1Linear equations in Piatetski-Shapiro primes2026-05-18T17:15:41ZWe establish discorrelation estimates between the Piatetski-Shapiro prime set \[ \mathcal{P}_γ := \{p \text{ is prime and } p = \lfloor n^{1/γ} \rfloor \text{ for some } n \in \mathbb{N}\} \] and arbitrary nilsequences when $γ\in (0,1)$ is sufficiently close to $1$. This extends earlier works which treated linear or polynomial exponential phase functions. As an application, we establish an asymptotic formula for the number of solutions in $\mathcal{P}_γ$ to any "finite-complexity" system of linear equations, including for the number of $k$-term arithmetic progressions in $\mathcal{P}_γ$ up to a threshold $N$ for any given $k \geq 3$. Furthermore, we show that there exists an absolute constant $C>0$ such that if \[ 1 - 2^{-Ck} < γ< 1, \] then the Piatetski-Shapiro primes $\mathcal{P}_γ$ contain infinitely many non-trivial $k$-term arithmetic progressions. This significantly improves upon the previous range of $γ$ obtained by Li and Pan, which is of triple exponential type.2026-05-18T17:15:41Z22 pagesXuancheng ShaoYu-Chen Sunhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18644v1Covering systems where the prime divisors of all moduli are only $2$, $3$, or $5$2026-05-18T16:51:26ZWe try to find all quadruples of positive integers $(m,a,b,c)$ with $a \geq b \geq c$ such that there exists a distinct covering system with minimum modulus $m$ and least common multiple of the moduli $2^a 3^b 5^c$. We obtain complete description of all such quadruples when $m=2,3,4,5$, or $6$, except when $m=6$ and $b=c=1$. We also show that if the LCM of the moduli has only $2$, $3$, or $5$ as prime divisors, then $m \leq 9$ and construct a distinct covering system with $m=8$, $a=8$, $b=3$, and $c=2$. When a covering system exists for a quadruple $(m,a,b,c)$ we provide an example. Nonexistence of covering systems is established via integer programming or by using a new estimate on the density of a set covered by a system of congruences.2026-05-18T16:51:26ZJoshua HarringtonJonah KleinJoshua LowranceOgnian Trifonovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15407v5Cross representations of additive complements of $r$-th powers2026-05-18T16:37:07ZLet $\mathbb{N}$ be the set of natural numbers and $\mathcal{S}_r=\big\{1^r, 2^r, 3^r,\cdots\big\}$ the set of $r$-th powers, where $r\ge 2$ is a natural number. Let $\mathcal{W}_r$ be an additive complement of $\mathcal{S}_r$ and $$ f_r(n)=\#\big\{(w,m^r)\in \mathcal{W}\times \mathcal{S}_r: n=w+m^r\big\}. $$ Motivated by a 1993 conjecture of Cilleruelo, we show that $$ \sum_{n\le N}f_r(n)-N\gg_r N^{1-\frac{1}{r}}. $$ Previously, the bound was only proved for $r=2$. In the case $r=2$, the lower bound above can be made more explicit as $$ \sum_{n\le N}f_2(n)-N\gg N^{1/2}(\log N)^δ $$ for some absolute constant $δ>0$, which improves a $\log$ factor upon a recent result of Ding, Sun, Wang and Xia.2025-12-17T12:57:36ZThe title of the article is revisedYuchen DingCsaba SándorZihan Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18555v1Three Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge primality proofs for Wagstaff numbers2026-05-18T15:35:56ZThe Wagstaff numbers $W_p = (2^p + 1)/3$ for odd primes $p$ are the natural $+1$ companions of the Mersenne numbers. Known primality proofs for $W_p$ with $p \geq 2617$ rely on the elliptic-curve primality proving algorithm of Atkin-Morain; Chebyshev/Lucas-type tests, while available as compositeness criteria, remain conjectural on the sufficiency side. We present fully verified primality proofs of $W_{2617}$ (788 digits), $W_{10501}$ (3161 digits), and $W_{12391}$ (3730 digits), independent of ECPP and relying only on classical $N-1$ machinery. The proofs apply the Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge (BLS) $N-1$ criterion to the cyclotomic decomposition $2^{p-1} - 1 = \prod_{d \mid p-1} Φ_d(2)$, harvesting factored content from the Cunningham project tables (used as evidence) and FactorDB (used only as a discovery aid, with every retrieved factor re-certified). As an independent check on the $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2}]$ arithmetic implementation, the Chua $N+1$ congruence $ω_3^{(W_p + 1)/2} \equiv -1 \pmod{W_p}$ -- the $a=3$ case of the Chua framework with $ω_3 = 3 + 2\sqrt{2}$, a necessary condition for Wagstaff primality -- is verified at each $W_p$.
BLS $N-1$ requires $p-1$ sufficiently smooth that enough cyclotomic factors $Φ_d(2)$ are fully factored. On the factorisation data consulted (Cunningham project tables and FactorDB, January-April 2026), $p = 10501$ and $p = 12391$ are the only exponents above $2617$ in the known Wagstaff prime/probable-prime list meeting this ceiling. Every cofactor primality is certified unconditionally by APR-CL; the method is independent of the Chebyshev sufficiency conjecture, and every step is reproducible from the archived scripts.2026-05-18T15:35:56Z11 pages. Code and certificates: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19645478Alexey Dolotov