https://arxiv.org/api/+bjehfZ5Z4/NrqfJx2dhvATi3iM2026-04-13T02:15:23Z653696015http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01664v2The category $Θ_2$, derived modifications, and deformation theory of monoidal categories2024-06-07T17:16:09ZA complex $C^\bullet(C,D)(F,G)(η, θ)$, generalising the Davydov-Yetter complex of a monoidal category, is constructed. Here $C,D$ are $\Bbbk$-linear (dg) monoidal categories, $F,G\colon C\to D$ are $\Bbbk$-linear (dg) strict monoidal functors, $η,θ\colon F\Rightarrow G$ are monoidal natural transformations. Morally, it is a complex of ``derived modifications'' $η\Rrightarrow θ$, likewise for the case of dg categories one has the complex of ``derived natural transformations'' $F\Rightarrow G$, given by the Hochschild cochain complex of $C$ with coefficients in $C$-bimodule $D(F-,G=)$. As well, an intrinsic homological algebra interpretation of $C^\bullet(C,D)(F,G)(η,θ)$ as $RHom$ in an abelian category of 2-bimodules over $C$, is provided.
The complex $C^\bullet(C,D)(F,G)(η,θ)$ naturally arises from a 2-cocellular dg vector space $A(C,D)(F,G)(η,θ)\colon Θ_2\to C^\bullet(\Bbbk)$, as its $Θ_2$-totalization (here $Θ_2$ is the category dual to the category of Joyal 2-disks).
It is shown that $H^3(C^\bullet(C,C)(\mathrm{Id},\mathrm{Id})(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})))$ is isomorphic to the vector space of the outer infinitesimal deformations of the $\Bbbk$-linear monoidal category which we call {\it full} deformations. It means that the following data is to be deformed: (a) the underlying dg category structure, (b) the monoidal product on morphisms (the monoidal product on objects is a set-theoretical datum and is maintained under the deformation), (c) the associator. It is shown that $C^\bullet(C,D)(F,F)(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})$ is a homotopy $e_2$-algebra. Conjecturally, $C^\bullet(C,C)(\mathrm{Id},\mathrm{Id})(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})$ is a homotopy $e_3$-algebra; however the proof requires more sophisticated methods and we hope to complete it in our next paper.2022-10-04T15:03:51Zv2, essentially improved and corrected, 69 pagesPiergiorgio PaneroBoris Shoikhethttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08660v3Filtered derived categories of curved deformations2024-06-06T20:20:26ZWe propose a solution to the "curvature problem" from arXiv:1505.03698 and arXiv:0905.3845 for infinitesimal deformations. Let $k$ be a field, $A$ a dg algebra over $k$ and $A_n = A[t]/(t^{n+1})$ a cdg algebra over $R_n = k[t]/(t^{n+1})$, $n \geq 0$, with reduction $A_n/tA_n = A$. We define the $n$-derived category $D^n(A_n)$ as the quotient of the homotopy category by the modules for which all quotients appearing in the associated graded object are acyclic. We prove this to be a compactly generated triangulated category with a semiorthogonal decomposition by $n + 1$ copies of $D(A)$, in which Positselski's semiderived category embeds admissibly.2024-02-13T18:42:28Z39 pages, no figures; v3: New introduction. Added Section 6.1 and Proposition 7.10Alessandro LehmannWendy Lowenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16082v3Support varieties for finite tensor categories: the tensor product property2024-06-06T07:41:51ZWe show that in a finite tensor category, the tensor product property holds for support varieties if and only if it holds between indecomposable periodic objects. We apply this to certain Hopf algebras in the form of skew group algebras. In particular, we show that the tensor product property holds for all objects in a symmetric finite tensor category over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.2023-06-28T10:29:19Z29 pagesPetter Andreas BerghJulia Yael PlavnikSarah Witherspoonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01977v2Relative K-homology of higher-order differential operators2024-06-04T11:02:06ZWe extend the notion of a spectral triple to that of a higher-order relative spectral triple, which accommodates several types of hypoelliptic differential operators on manifolds with boundary. The bounded transform of a higher-order relative spectral triple gives rise to a relative K-homology cycle. In the case of an elliptic differential operator on a compact smooth manifold with boundary, we calculate the K-homology boundary map of the constructed relative K-homology cycle to obtain a generalization of the Baum-Douglas-Taylor index theorem.2023-08-03T18:12:01Z34 pagesMagnus Frieshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01212v1Additive cycle complex and coherent duality2024-06-03T11:28:21ZLet $k$ be a field of positive characteristic $p$, and $X$ be a separated of finite type $k$-scheme of dimension $d$. We construct a cycle map from the additive cycle complex to the residual complex of Serre-Grothendieck coherent duality theory. This map is compatible with a cubical version of the map constructed in [Ren23] arXiv:2104.09662 when $k$ is perfect. As a corollary, we get injectivity statements for (additive) higher Chow groups as well as for motivic cohomology (with modulus) with $\mathbb{Z}/p$ coefficients when $k$ is algebraically closed.2024-06-03T11:28:21Z13 pages. v2 comes soonFei Renhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00275v2Chromatic Cardinalities via Redshift2024-06-02T11:55:48ZUsing higher descent for chromatically localized algebraic $K$-theory, we show that the higher semiadditive cardinality of a $π$-finite $p$-space $A$ at the Lubin-Tate spectrum $E_n$ is equal to the higher semiadditive cardinality of the free loop space $LA$ at $E_{n-1}$. By induction, it is thus equal to the homotopy cardinality of the $n$-fold free loop space $L^n A$. We explain how this allows one to bypass the Ravenel-Wilson computation in the proof of the $\infty$-semiadditivity of the $T(n)$-local categories.2023-09-30T06:47:47Z9 page, final versionInternational Mathematics Research Notices, 2024, rnae109Shay Ben-MosheShachar CarmeliTomer M. SchlankLior Yanovski10.1093/imrn/rnae109http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11383v2Tensor products and intertwining operators between two uniserial representations of the Galilean Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$2024-05-31T20:41:18ZLet $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$, $n\ge 1$, be the Galilean Lie algebra over a field of characteristic zero, here $\mathfrak{h}_{n}$ is the Heisenberg Lie algebra of dimension $2n+1$, and $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$ acts on $\mathfrak{h}_{n}$ so that $\mathfrak{h}_n\simeq V(2n-1)\oplus V(0)$ as $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-modules (here $V(k)$ denotes the irreducible $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-module of highest weight $k$). In this paper, we study the tensor product of two uniserial representations of $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$. We obtain the $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-module structure of the socle of $V\otimes W$ and we describe the space of intertwining operators $\text{Hom}_{\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n}(V,W)$, where $V$ and $W$ are uniserial representations of $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$. The structure of the radical of $V\otimes W$ follows from that of the socle of $V^*\otimes W^*$.
The result is subtle and shows how difficult is to obtain the whole socle series of arbitrary tensor products of uniserials. In contrast to the serial associative case, our results for $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n$ reveal that these tensor products are far from being a direct sum of uniserials; in particular, there are cases in which the tensor product of two uniserial $\big(\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{h}_n\big)$-modules is indecomposable but not uniserial. Recall that a foundational result of T. Nakayama states that every finitely generated module over a serial associative algebra is a direct sum of uniserial modules. This article extends a previous work in which we obtained the corresponding results for the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}(2)\ltimes \mathfrak{a}_m$ where $\mathfrak{a}_m$ is the abelian Lie algebra of dimension $m+1$ and $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$ acts so that $\mathfrak{a}_m\simeq V(m)$ as $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$-modules.2023-01-26T19:53:39ZTo appear in Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923 -). arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2201.10605Leandro CaglieroIván Gómez Rivera10.1007/s10231-024-01439-xhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20942v1$G$-tables and the Poisson structure of the even cohomology of cotangent bundle of the Heisenberg Lie group2024-05-31T15:40:58ZIn the first part of the paper, we define the concept of a $G$-table of a $G$-(co)algebra and we compute the $G$-table of some $G$-(co)algebras (here a $G$-algebra is an algebra on which $G$ acts, semisimply, by algebra automorphisms). The $G$-table of a $G$-(co)algebra $A$ is a set of scalars that provides very precise and concise information about both the algebra structure and the $G$-module structure of $A$. In particular, the ordinary multiplication table of $A$ can be derived from the $G$-table of $A$. From the $G$-table of a $G$-algebra $A$ we define a plain algebra $P(A)$ associated to it and we present some basic functoriality results about $P$. Obtaining the $G$-table of a given $G$-algebra $A$ requires a considerable amount of work but, the result, is a very powerful tool as shown in the second part of the paper. Here we compute the $SL(2)$-tables of the Poisson algebra structure of the even-degree part of the cohomology associated to the cotangent bundle of the 3-dimensional Heisenberg Lie group with Lie algebra $h$, that is $H_E(h)=H_E^{\bullet}(h,\bigwedge^{\bullet}h)$. This Poisson $SL(2)$-algebra has dimension 18. From these $SL(2)$-tables we deduce that the underlying Lie algebra of $H_E(h)$ is isomorphic to $gl(3)\ltimes gl(3)_{ab}$ with the first factor acting on the second (abelian) one by the adjoint representation. We find it remarkable that the Lie algebra structure on $H_{E}(h)$ contains a semisimple Lie subalgebra (in this case $sl(3)$) strictly larger than the Levi factor of $\text{Der}(h)$, which in this case is $sl(2)\subset H^{1}(h,h)$. This means that the Levi factor of the Lie algebra $H_{E}(h)$ has nontrivial elements outside $H^{1}(h,h)$. Finally, this leads us to find a family of commutative Poisson algebras whose underlying Lie structure is $gl(n)\ltimes gl(n)_{ab}$ (arbitrary $n$) such that, for $n=3$, is isomorphic to $H_E(h)$.2024-05-31T15:40:58ZLeandro CaglieroGonzalo Gutierrezhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20854v1Homotopy theory of pre-Calabi-Yau morphisms2024-05-31T14:37:21ZIn this article we study the homotopy theory of pre-Calabi-Yau morphisms, viewing them as Maurer-Cartan elements of an $L_{\infty}$-algebra. We give two different notions of homotopy: a notion of weak homotopy for morphisms between $d$-pre-Calabi-Yau categories whose underlying graded quivers on the domain (resp. codomain) are the same, and a notion of homotopy for morphisms between fixed pre-Calabi-Yau categories $(\mathcal{A},s_{d+1}M_{\mathcal{A}})$ and $(\mathcal{B},s_{d+1}M_{\mathcal{B}})$. Then, we show that the notion of homotopy is stable under composition and that homotopy equivalences are quasi-isomorphisms. Finally, we prove that the functor constructed by the author in a previous article between the category of pre-Calabi-Yau categories and the partial category of $A_{\infty}$-categories of the form $\mathcal{A}\oplus\mathcal{A}^*[d-1]$, for $\mathcal{A}$ a graded quiver, together with hat morphisms sends homotopic $d$-pre-Calabi-Yau morphisms to weak homotopic $A_{\infty}$-morphisms.2024-05-31T14:37:21Z54 pagesMarion Boucrothttp://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18885v1A general Greenlees-May splitting principle2024-05-29T08:41:49ZIn equivariant topology, Greenlees and May used Mackey functors to show that, rationally, the stable homotopy category of $G$-spectra over a finite group $G$ splits as a product of simpler module categories. We extend the algebraic part (also independently proved by Thévenaz and Webb) of this classical result to Mackey modules over an arbitrary Green functor, and use the case of the complex representation ring Green functor to obtain an algebraic model of the rational equivariant Kasparov category of $G$-cell algebras.2024-05-29T08:41:49Z15 pagesSerge BoucIvo Dell'AmbrogioRubén Martoshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17854v1Quantum $K$-theory of Lagrangian Grassmannian via parabolic Peterson isomorphism2024-05-28T06:13:32ZWe study Schubert calculus in the torus-equivariant quantum $K$-ring of the Lagrangian Grassmannian $\mathrm{LG}(n)$. Our main tool is the $K$-theoretic Peterson map due to Kato. The map is from the (localized) equivariant $K$-homology ring $K_{*}^{T}(\mathrm{Gr}_{G})$ of the affine Grassmannian $\mathrm{Gr}_{G}$ of the symplectic group $G=\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}(\mathbb{C})$ to the (localized) torus-equivariant quantum $K$-ring $QK_{T}(\mathrm{LG}(n))$. We determine explicitly the kernel of this map.2024-05-28T06:13:32Z18 pagesTakeshi IkedaTakafumi KounoYusuke NakayamaKohei Yamaguchihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03204v2Extension groups for the $C^*$-algebras associated with $λ$-graph systems2024-05-28T01:30:42ZA $λ$-graph system is a labeled Bratteli diagram with certain additional structure, which presents a subshift. The class of the $C^*$-algebras $\mathcal{O}_{\frak L}$ associated with the $λ$-graph systems is a generalized class of the class of Cuntz--Krieger algebras. In this paper, we will compute the strong extension groups $\operatorname{Ext}_{\operatorname{s}}(\mathcal{O}_{\frak L})$ for the $C^*$-algebras associated with $λ$-graph systems ${\frak L}$ and study their relation with the weak extension group $\operatorname{Ext}_{\operatorname{w}}(\mathcal{O}_{\frak L})$.2024-05-06T07:05:20ZSeveral typos were corrected. 25 pagesKengo Matsumotohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06064v3Equivariant Topological T-Duality2024-05-26T23:28:10ZTopological T-duality is a relationship between pairs (E, P ) over a fixed space X, where E over X is a principal torus bundle and P over E is a twist, such as a gerbe of principal PU(H)-bundle. This is of interest to topologists because of the T-duality transformation: a T-duality relation between pairs (E, P ) and (F, Q ) comes with an isomorphism (with degree shift) between the twisted K-theory of E and the twisted K-theory of F. We formulate topological T-duality in the equivariant setting, following the definition of Bunke, Rumpf, and Schick. We define the T-duality transformation in equivariant K-theory and show that it is an isomorphism for actions of compact Lie groups, equal to its own inverse and uniquely characterized by naturality and a normalization for trivial situations.2023-10-09T18:14:14Z36 pages, v2: added discussion of uniqueness of T-duality transform, correction of typos, update of references. v3 Added reference on physics background. Stressed that we deal with circle bundle case -final version, to appear in Communications in Mathematical PhysicsCommun. Math. Phys. (2024) 405:179Tom DoveUniversität GöttingenThomas SchickUniversität Göttingen10.1007/s00220-024-05044-0http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02332v3K-theory and index theory on manifolds with a proper Lie group action2024-05-26T15:27:00ZThe paper is devoted to the index theory of orbital and transverse elliptic operators on manifolds with a proper Lie group action. It corrects errors of my previous paper (published in JNCG in 2016) on transverse operators and contains new results. The two index theories, orbital and transverse, are very much intertwined and interdependent, and are treated together. The theory of orbital operators is developed from the basic definitions to the final index theorem. The KK-theoretic proofs of index theorems for elliptic, t-elliptic and orbital elliptic operators are given in sections 9, 10, 11. Throughout the paper, we use a simpler method in constructing pseudo-differential operators.2022-10-05T15:36:41Z52 pagesGennadi Kasparovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14465v1Foams with flat connections and algebraic K-theory2024-05-23T11:54:04ZThis paper proposes a connection between algebraic K-theory and foam cobordisms, where foams are stratified manifolds with singularities of a prescribed form. We consider $n$-dimensional foams equipped with a flat bundle of finitely-generated projective $R$-modules over each facet of the foam, together with gluing conditions along the subfoam of singular points. In a suitable sense which will become clear, a vertex (or the smallest stratum) of an $n$-dimensional foam replaces an $(n+1)$-simplex with a total ordering of vertices. We show that the first K-theory group of a ring $R$ can be identified with the cobordism group of decorated 1-foams embedded in the plane. A similar relation between the $n$-th algebraic K-theory group of a ring $R$ and the cobordism group of decorated $n$-foams embedded in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ is expected for $n>1$. An analogous correspondence is proposed for arbitrary exact categories. Modifying the embedding and other conditions on the foams may lead to new flavors of K-theory groups.2024-05-23T11:54:04Z57 pages, many figuresDavid GepnerMee Seong ImMikhail KhovanovNitu Kitchloo