https://arxiv.org/api/1mtyew/9ttqg3x85jTc8CHbkzf02026-04-10T12:46:51Z653569015http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14561v1Duplicial functors, descent categories and generalized Hopf modules2025-01-24T15:05:18ZBöhm and Ştefan have expressed cyclic homology as an invariant that assigns homology groups $\mathrm{HC}^χ_i(\mathrm N, \mathrm M)$ to right and left coalgebras $\mathrm N$ respectively $\mathrm M$ over a distributive law $χ$ between two comonads. For the key example associated to a bialgebra $H$, right $χ$-coalgebras have a description in terms of modules and comodules over $H$. The present article formulates conditions under which such a description is simultaneously possible for the left $χ$-coalgebras. In the above example, this is the case when the bialgebra $H$ is a Hopf algebra with bijective antipode. We also discuss how the generalized Hopf module theorem by Mesablishvili and Wisbauer features both in theory and examples.2025-01-24T15:05:18Z32 pages, many figuresIvan BartulovićJohn BoiquayeUlrich Krähmerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15136v2A motivic spectrum representing hermitian K-theory2025-01-24T08:25:32ZWe establish fundamental motivic results about hermitian K-theory without assuming that 2 is invertible on the base scheme. In particular, we prove that both quadratic and symmetric Grothendieck-Witt theory satisfy Nisnevich descent, and that symmetric Grothendieck-Witt theory further satisfies a projective bundle formula, as well as dévissage and A^1-invariance over a regular Noetherian base of finite Krull dimension. We use this to show that over a regular Noetherian base, symmetric Grothendieck-Witt theory is represented by a motivic E-infinity-ring spectrum, which we then show is an absolutely pure spectrum, answering a question of Déglise. As with algebraic K-theory, we show that over a general base, one can also construct a hermitian K-theory motivic spectrum, representing this time a suitable homotopy invariant and Karoubi-localising version of Grothendieck-Witt theory.2024-02-23T06:43:14Z113 pagesBaptiste CalmèsYonatan HarpazDenis Nardinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14106v1Mixed Motives2025-01-23T21:32:29ZA mixed Weil cohomology with values in an abelian rigid tensor category is a cohomological functor on Voevodsky's category of motives which is satisfying Künneth formula and such that its restriction to Chow motives is a Weil cohomology. We show that the universal mixed Weil cohomology exists. Nori motives can be recovered as a universal enrichment of Betti cohomology via a localisation. This new picture is drawing some consequences with respect to the theory of mixed motives in arbitrary characteristic.2025-01-23T21:32:29ZL. Barbieri-Viale10.1016/j.indag.2025.03.002http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13909v1Synchronizing Dynamical Systems: Finitely presented systems and Ruelle algebras2025-01-23T18:48:13ZThe main goals of the present paper are to determine the structure of the $C^\ast$-algebras associated to a finitely presented system and to develop the basic theory of the Ruelle algebras associated to a general synchronizing system. The later is related to the former in the sense that we show that Ruelle algebras associated to a finitely presented system are explicitly related to the Smale space case. Nevertheless, we give an example of a sofic shift where the Ruelle algebras are not Poincare dual (whereas this duality holds in the Smale space case). The relevant $C^\ast$-algebras are the synchronizing heteroclinic algebras that were introduced in our previous work on synchronizing systems. They are very much related to previous work of Thomsen, who in turn was building on work of Ruelle, Putnam, and Spielberg.2025-01-23T18:48:13Z24 pages, 3 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2206.04755Robin J. DeeleyAndrew M. Stockerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.03108v2On the differential $K$-theory of moduli stacks2025-01-21T19:39:26ZWe compute the connective differential $K$-theory and the differential cohomology of the moduli stack of principal $G$-bundles with connection. The results are formulated in terms of invariant polynomials and the representation ring of $G$. We use the homotopy theory of presheaves of spaces and presheaves of spectra to establish the results.2025-01-06T16:15:01Z22 pages, minor correctionsDaniel Gradyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12250v1Realizing the Tutte polynomial as a cut-and-paste K-theoretic invariant2025-01-21T16:10:44ZCut-and-paste $K$-theory is a new variant of higher algebraic $K$-theory that has proven to be useful in problems involving decompositions of combinatorial and geometric objects, e.g., scissors congruence of polyhedra and reconstruction problems in graph theory. In this paper, we show that this novel machinery can also be used in the study of matroids. Specifically, via the $K$-theory of categories with covering families developed by Bohmann-Gerhardt-Malkiewich-Merling-Zakharevich, we realize the Tutte polynomial map of Brylawski (also known as the universal Tutte-Grothendieck invariant for matroids) as the $K_0$-homomorphism induced by a map of $K$-theory spectra.2025-01-21T16:10:44Z29 pages, comments welcomeMauricio Gomez Lopezhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11504v1Corner embeddings into algebras of compact operators in $K$-theory2025-01-20T14:25:14ZWe show that in $K$-theory-like categories many corner embeddings into a discrete algebra of compact operators are invertible, and consequently functors on splitexact algebraic $KK$-theory are faithful if and only if they are faithful on the subcategory generated by the homomorphisms.2025-01-20T14:25:14ZBernhard Burgstallerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2210.17364v3Characters and transfer maps via categorified traces2025-01-19T18:21:01ZWe develop a theory of generalized characters of local systems in $\infty$-categories, which extends classical character theory for group representations and, in particular, the induced character formula. A key aspect of our approach is that we utilize the interaction between traces and their categorifications. We apply this theory to reprove and refine various results on the composability of Becker-Gottlieb transfers, the Hochschild homology of Thom spectra, and the additivity of traces in stable $\infty$-categories.2022-10-31T14:41:45Z99 pages, comments welcome! v2: updated section 4.2. v3: incorporated feedback from anonymous referee, fixed proof of Lemma 4.49Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 13 (2025) e93Shachar CarmeliBastiaan CnossenMaxime RamziLior Yanovski10.1017/fms.2025.23http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05620v3$E_\infty$-cells and general linear groups of infinite fields2025-01-18T21:56:00ZWe study the general linear groups of infinite fields (or more generally connected semi-local rings with infinite residue fields) from the perspective of $E_\infty$-algebras. We prove that there is a vanishing line of slope 2 for their $E_\infty$-homology, and analyse the groups on this line by determining all invariant bilinear forms on Steinberg modules. We deduce from this a number of consequences regarding the unstable homology of general linear groups, in particular answering questions of Rognes, Suslin, Mirzaii, and others.2020-05-12T08:54:07Z82 pages; final version to appear in Duke Mathematical JournalSoren GalatiusAlexander KupersOscar Randal-Williamshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10779v1On the centre of crossed modules of Lie algebras2025-01-18T14:27:11ZThis paper studies the relationship between crossed modules of Lie algebras and their centres. We show that any crossed module \(\partial : L_1\to L_0\) of Lie algebras fits in an exact sequence involving cohomology of the homotopy Lie algebras \(π_0(L_*)\) and \(π_1(L_*)\).2025-01-18T14:27:11ZarXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2109.00981Mariam Pirashvilihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06660v3The maximal coarse Baum-Connes conjecture for spaces that admit an A-by-FCE coarse fibration structure2025-01-18T03:12:00ZIn this paper, we introduce a concept of A-by-FCE coarse fibration structure for metric spaces, which serves as a generalization of the A-by-CE structure for a sequence of group extensions proposed by Deng, Wang, and Yu. We prove that the maximal coarse Baum-Connes conjecture holds for metric spaces with bounded geometry that admit an A-by-FCE coarse fibration structure. As an application, the relative expanders constructed by Arzhantseva and Tessera, as well as the box spaces derived from an ``amenable-by-Haagerup'' group extension, admit the A-by-FCE coarse fibration structure. Consequently, the maximal coarse Baum-Connes conjecture holds for these spaces, which may not admit an FCE structure, i.e. fibred coarse embedding into Hilbert space.2024-08-13T06:20:05ZarXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1208.4543Liang GuoQin WangChen Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10518v12-Segal sets from cuts of rooted trees2025-01-17T19:35:49ZThe theory of 2-Segal sets has connections to various important constructions such as the Waldhausen $S_\bullet$-construction in algebraic $K$-theory, Hall algebras, and (co)operads. In this paper, we construct 2-Segal sets from rooted trees and explore how these applications are illustrated by this example.2025-01-17T19:35:49Z28 pages, to appear in WIT IV proceedingsJulia E. BergnerOlivia BorghiPinka DeyImma Gálvez-CarrilloTeresa Hoekstra-Mendozahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20382v2Non-representable six-functor formalisms2025-01-17T16:31:01ZIn this article, we study the properties of motivic homotopy category $\mathcal{SH}_{\operatorname{ext}}(\mathcal{X})$ developed by Chowdhury and Khan-Ravi for $\mathcal{X}$ a Nis-loc Stack. In particular, we compare the above construction with Voevodsky's original construction using NisLoc topology. Using the techniques developed by Liu-Zheng and Mann's notion of $\infty$-category of correspondences and abstract six-functor formalisms, we also extend the exceptional functors and extend properties like projection formula, base change and purity to the non-representable situation.2024-09-30T15:18:15ZSecond version with some details on the extensions to higher derived stacks. Comments are welcome!Chirantan ChowdhuryAlessandro D'Angelohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06435v2Hochschild homology of reductive $p$-adic groups2025-01-17T12:09:26ZConsider a reductive $p$-adic group $G$, its (complex-valued) Hecke algebra $H(G)$ and the Harish-Chandra--Schwartz algebra $S(G)$. We compute the Hochschild homology groups of $H(G)$ and of $S(G)$, and we describe the outcomes in several ways.
Our main tools are algebraic families of smooth $G$-representations. With those we construct maps from $HH_n (H(G))$ and $HH_n (S(G))$ to modules of differential $n$-forms on affine varieties. For $n = 0$ this provides a description of the cocentres of these algebras in terms of nice linear functions on the Grothendieck group of finite length (tempered) $G$-representations.
It is known from earlier work that every Bernstein ideal $H(G)^s$ of $H(G)$ is closely related to a crossed product algebra of the from $O(T) \rtimes W$. Here $O(T)$ denotes the regular functions on the variety $T$ of unramified characters of a Levi subgroup $L$ of $G$, and $W$ is a finite group acting on $T$. We make this relation even stronger by establishing an isomorphism between $HH_* (H(G)^s)$ and $HH_* (O(T) \rtimes W)$, although we have to say that in some cases it is necessary to twist $C[W]$ by a 2-cocycle.
Similarly we prove that the Hochschild homology of the two-sided ideal $S(G)^s$ of $S(G)$ is isomorphic to $HH_* (C^\infty (T_u) \rtimes W)$, where $T_u$ denotes the Lie group of unitary unramified characters of $L$. In these pictures of $HH_* (H(G))$ and $HH_* (S(G))$ we also show how the Bernstein centre of $H(G)$ acts.
Finally, we derive similar expressions for the (periodic) cyclic homology groups of $H(G)$ and of $S(G)$ and we relate that to topological K-theory.2022-03-12T13:38:10ZJournal of Noncommutative Geometry 18.4 (2024), 1349-1413Maarten Solleveldhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00981v4On the Gottlieb group, Drinfeld centre and the centre of a crossed module2025-01-17T10:13:18ZThis new version includes a connection of the main construction to the Gottlieb group, which was absent in the previous versions. However, the first version included material about Lie algebras which will become available soon as a separate paper.
The aim of this paper is to introduce the concept of the centre of a crossed module $\G_* = (\G_1\to \G_0)$. This centre is closely related to the Gottlieb group of the classifying space of a crossed module and also to the Drinfeld centre of a monoidal category introduced independently by Drinfeld and Joyal and Street. Our definition of the centre is based on certain crossed homomorphisms $\G_0\to \G_1$, which makes it easy to relate it to group cohomology. This connection is used to relate the Gottlieb group of a 2-type to its Whitehead centre.2021-09-02T14:33:11ZMariam Pirashvili