https://arxiv.org/api/DongZ5PWv7fPz3QTXoBiLtNtH7M2026-03-26T15:56:28Z581722515http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03484v2Infinitely ludic categories2025-11-09T15:04:31ZPursuing a new approach to the study of infinite games in combinatorics, we introduce the categories $\mathbf{Game}_{A}$ and $\mathbf{Game}_{B}$ and improve some classical results concerning topological games related to the duality between covering properties of $X$ and convergence properties of $\mathrm{C}_{\mathrm {p}}(X)$ by establishing the existence and key role of certain natural transformations. We then describe these ludic categories in various equivalent forms, viewing their objects as certain structured trees, presheaves, or metric spaces, and we thereby obtain their arboreal, functorial and metrical appearances. We use their metrical disguise to demonstrate a universality property of the Banach-Mazur game. The various equivalent descriptions come with underlying functors to more familiar categories which help establishing some important properties of the game categories: they are complete, cocomplete, extensive, cartesian closed, and coregular, but neither regular nor locally cartesian closed. We prove that their classes of strong epimorphisms, of regular epimorphisms, and of descent morphisms, are all distinct, and we show that these categories have weak classifiers for strong partial maps. Some of the categorical constructions have interesting game-theoretic interpretations.2024-01-07T13:52:50ZMatheus DuziPaul SzeptyckiWalter Tholenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03472v2Every group retraction can be realized as a topological retraction2025-11-08T06:11:03ZGiven a group retraction $r: G \rightarrow H $, we construct a finite topological space $ X_r $ of height 1, together with a topological retraction $\overline{r}: X_r \rightarrow X_r $, such that the group of automorphisms $ \mathrm{Aut}(X_r) $ (or the group of self-homotopy equivalences $ \mathcal{E}(X_r) $) of $X_r$ is isomorphic to $ G $, and $ \mathrm{Aut}(\overline{r}(X_r)) $ (or $\mathcal{E}(\overline{r}(X_r)) $) is isomorphic to $ H$. Moreover, there is a natural map $\overline{r}' : \mathrm{Aut}(X_r) \rightarrow \mathrm{Aut}(\overline{r}(X_r)) $ that coincides with the original group retraction $ r $. As a direct consequence of this construction, we show that height 1 is the minimal height required to realize any finite group as the group of automorphisms (or the group of self-homotopy equivalences) of a finite topological space, except in the case where $ G $ is a symmetric group. In that unique case, the group can be realized by a finite topological space of height 0.2025-11-05T13:53:15ZNew reference addedPedro J. Chocanohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13169v2Monadic functors forgetful of (dis)inhibited actions2025-11-07T12:28:15ZWe prove a number of results of the following common flavor: for a category $\mathcal{C}$ of topological or uniform spaces with all manner of other properties of common interest (separation / completeness / compactness axioms), a group (or monoid) $\mathbb{G}$ equipped with various types of topological structure (topologies, uniformities) and the corresponding category $\mathcal{C}^{\mathbb{G}}$ of appropriately compatible $\mathbb{G}$-flows in $\mathcal{C}$, the forgetful functor $\mathcal{C}^{\mathbb{G}}\to \mathcal{C}$ is monadic. In all cases of interest the domain category $\mathcal{C}^{\mathbb{G}}$ is also cocomplete, so that results on adjunction lifts along monadic functors apply to provide equivariant completion and/or compactification functors. This recovers, unifies and generalizes a number of such results in the literature due to de Vries, Mart'yanov and others on existence of equivariant compactifications / completions and cocompleteness of flow categories.2024-04-19T20:36:06Zv2 matches published version, with typo fixes; 16 pages + referencesA. Chirvasitu, Monadic functors forgetful of (dis)inhibited actions, Theory Appl. Categ. {\bf 41} (2024), Paper No. 44, 1536--1556; MR4811433Alexandru Chirvasituhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04059v1On a variation of selective separability: S-separability2025-11-06T04:58:39ZA space $X$ is M-separable (selectively separable) (Scheepers, 1999; Bella et al., 2009) if for every sequence $(Y_n)$ of dense subspaces of $X$ there exists a sequence $(F_n)$ such that for each $n$ $F_n$ is a finite subset of $Y_n$ and $\cup_{n\in \mathbb{N}} F_n$ is dense in $X$. In this paper, we introduce and study a strengthening of M-separability situated between H- and M-separability, which we call S-separability: for every sequence $(Y_n)$ of dense subspaces of $X$ there exists a sequence $(F_n)$ such that for each $n$ $F_n$ is a finite subset of $Y_n$ and for each finite family $\mathcal F$ of nonempty open sets of $X$ some $n$ satisfies $U\cap F_n\neq\emptyset$ for all $U\in \mathcal F$.2025-11-06T04:58:39ZDebraj ChandraNur AlamDipika Royhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04049v1On a variation of selective separability using ideals2025-11-06T04:38:29ZA space $X$ is H-separable (Bella et al., 2009) if for every sequence $(Y_n)$ of dense subspaces of $X$ there exists a sequence $(F_n)$ such that for each $n$ $F_n$ is a finite subset of $Y_n$ and every nonempty open set of $X$ intersects $F_n$ for all but finitely many $n$. In this paper, we introduce and study an ideal variant of H-separability, called $\mathcal{I}$-H-separability.2025-11-06T04:38:29ZDebraj ChandraNur AlamDipika Royhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04038v1Certain results on selection principles associated with bornological structure in topological spaces2025-11-06T04:16:34ZWe study selection principles related to bornological covers in a topological space $X$ following the work of Aurichi et al., 2019, where selection principles have been investigated in the function space $C_\mathfrak{B}(X)$ endowed with the topology $τ_\mathfrak{B}$ of uniform convergence on bornology $\mathfrak{B}$. We show equivalences among certain selection principles and present some game theoretic observations involving bornological covers. We investigate selection principles on the product space $X^n$ equipped with the product bornolgy $\mathfrak{B}^n$, $n\in ω$. Considering the cardinal invariants such as the unbounding number ($\mathfrak{b}$), dominating numbers ($\mathfrak{d}$), pseudointersection numbers ($\mathfrak{p}$) etc., we establish connections between the cardinality of base of a bornology with certain selection principles. Finally, we investigate some variations of the tightness properties of $C_\mathfrak{B}(X)$ and present their characterizations in terms of selective bornological covering properties of $X$.2025-11-06T04:16:34ZDebraj ChandraSubhankar DasNur Alamhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14474v2Blending attractors of Iterated Function Systems2025-11-05T21:12:22ZIn this paper we discuss a new method to blend fractal attractors using the code map for the IFS formed by the Hutchinson--Barnsley operators of a finite family of hyperbolic IFSs. We introduce a parameter called blending coefficient to measure the similarity between the blended set and each one of the original attractors. We also introduce a discrete approximation algorithm and prove a rigorous error estimation used to approximate these new objects. Several simulation results are provided illustrating our techniques.2025-10-16T09:19:00Z23pages, 15 figuresElismar R. Oliveirahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03648v1Knotted surfaces, Homological Norm and Extendable Subgroup2025-11-05T17:08:08ZWe prove that for arbitrary g, there is a surface K of genus g embedded in S4, which has finitely many extendable self-homeomorphisms' action on H1(K,Z), by defining a norm on H1(K,Z) and proving its additivity.2025-11-05T17:08:08Z9 pages, 1 figureTop. and its App 377(2026), 1-6Qiling Liu10.1016/j.topol.2025.109644http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20791v2The weak Extension Principle2025-11-05T16:37:01ZWe prove a rigidity result for maps between Čech-Stone remainders under fairly mild forcing axioms.2024-07-30T12:55:36Z8 pages, version to appear in the JSLAlessandro VignatiDeniz Yilmaz10.1017/jsl.2025.10124http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03326v1Simplicial Homology Groups2025-11-05T09:44:58ZThis expository article presents a self-contained introduction to simplicial homology for finite simplicial complexes, emphasizing concrete computation and geometric intuition. Beginning with orientations of simplices and the construction of free abelian chain groups, the boundary operators are defined via the alternating-sum formula and shown to satisfy the chain-complex identity that the boundary of a boundary vanishes. Cycles and boundaries are then developed as kernels and images of the boundary maps, leading to homology groups that capture connected components, independent loops, and higher-dimensional voids. Throughout, detailed low-dimensional examples and step-by-step matrix calculations illustrate how to form boundary matrices, compute kernels and images, and identify generators and relations in \(H_p\). The presentation highlights universal properties of chain groups, clarifies sign conventions and induced orientations, and demonstrates the invariance of homology under combinatorial refinements, thereby connecting geometric features of spaces to computable algebraic invariants.2025-11-05T09:44:58ZSanjay Mishrahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01426v1Priestley perspective on pointfree topology2025-11-03T10:23:16ZPriestley duality has diverse applications in various branches of mathematics. In this survey, we discuss its usefulness in pointfree topology. This is done by providing Priestley perspective on several key notions, including spatiality, sublocales, separation axioms, compactness, and local compactness. This approach yields a new perspective on a number of classic results in pointfree topology.2025-11-03T10:23:16Z30 pagesGuram BezhanishviliSebastian D. Melzerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26439v2When is the operation $τ_{T,L}$ a triangle function on $\Del^+$?2025-11-03T09:12:04ZThis paper resolves an open problem posed by Schweizer and Sklar in 1983. We establish that the binary operation $\tauTL$ is a triangle function on $\Delp$ if and only if the following three conditions hold: (a) $L$ is a continuous t-conorm on $[0, \infty]$ satisfying $(LCS)$; (b) $T$ is a t-norm on $[0, 1]$; and (c) $T$ is weakly left continuous, with left continuity required when $L$ is non-Archimedean.2025-10-30T12:34:58Z15 pagesHongliang LaiMengyu LuoJie Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11803v1Spectre operator, achievement sets and sets of P-sums in a hyperspace of compact sets2025-11-02T13:36:42ZLet $(X,+,d)$ be an Abelian metric group and $A\subset X$. We investigate the spectre of a set $A$, defined as the set of all elements $z\in X$ such that for every $x\in A$ either $x+z \in A$ or $x-z \in A$. We consider the corresponding to this notion operator $S$ acting on the hyperspace of compact sets and examine its properties. Furthermore, we study the families of achievement sets and sets of $P$-sums in this hyperspace, as well as prove some properties of achievement sets in the plane.2025-11-02T13:36:42ZPiotr NowakowskiFranciszek Prus-WiśniowskiFilip Turobośhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00864v1Transitivity in CR-Dynamical Systems2025-11-02T09:04:08ZA CR-dynamical system is a pair $(X, G)$, where $X$ is a compact metric space and $G$ is a closed relation (CR) on $X$. In this paper, we introduce a new type of transitive point and transitivity in CR-dynamical systems. We develop a new tool called transitivity trees, which we use to determine the relationship between the different types of transitive points.2025-11-02T09:04:08ZSina GreenwoodAndrew Woodhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03531v2Non-commutative branched covers and bundle unitarizability2025-11-01T12:19:25ZWe prove that (a) the sections space of a continuous unital subhomogeneous $C^*$ bundle over compact metrizable $X$ admits a finite-index expectation onto $C(X)$, answering a question of Blanchard-Gogić (in the metrizable case); (b) such expectations cannot, generally, have ``optimal index'', answering negatively a variant of the same question; and (c) a homogeneous continuous Banach bundle over a locally paracompact base space $X$ can be renormed into a Hilbert bundle in such a manner that the original space of bounded sections is $C_b(X)$-linearly Banach-Mazur-close to the resulting Hilbert module over the algebra $C_b(X)$ of continuous bounded functions on $X$. This last result resolves quantitatively another problem posed by Gogić.2024-09-05T13:44:40Zv2 amends the statement of Proposition 2.8 and adds Remark 2.9; 17 pages + referencesAlexandru Chirvasitu