https://arxiv.org/api/rR+A/3zggky/3EGx9Ng5DKG1Twk2026-06-14T00:59:29Z591018015http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14943v2Edge-ends versus topological ends of graphs2026-02-26T16:11:20ZDiestel and Kühn proved that the topological ends of an infinite graph are precisely its undominated graph ends, yielding a canonical embedding of the space of topological ends into the space of graph ends. For edge-ends, introduced by Hahn, Laviolette and Širáň, such an embedding does not exist in general.
In this note, we characterize the class of infinite graphs for which the topological ends admit a natural injective map into the space of edge-ends that is compatible with the canonical maps between end spaces. Our characterization is purely combinatorial and is expressed in terms of edge-equivalence classes of vertices.
Moreover, when such an embedding exists, we identify precisely which edge-ends arise from topological ends, showing that they are exactly the edge-ends containing a non-dominated ray. This establishes a parallel result to the theorem of Diestel and Kühn for edge-end spaces.2026-02-16T17:27:28ZLeandro AurichiPaulo Magalhães JúniorGuilherme Eduardo Pintohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23107v1Structure Theorems for locally compact modules over localizations of the integers2026-02-26T15:21:22ZGiven a multiplicatively closed subset $S$ of the integers, there exist Structure Theorems for $LC$ modules over the localization $\mathbb{Z}S^{-1}$ that are "similar" to those of $LCA$ groups. The most notable one is the 1st Theorem: Given such a module $M$, there exists a unique set of prime numbers $Σ$ (purely dependent on $S$) for which $M \cong \mathbb{R}^n \times \sideset{}{'}\prod_{q \in Σ} \mathbb{Q}_p^{n_p} \times N$, where $(n, (n_p)_{p \in Σ})$ is a sequence of nonnegative integers and $N$ contains a compact open submodule $K$ such that $K/K_0$ is a topological module over $\prod_{ q \in \mathbb{P}\setminusΣ} \mathbb{Z}_q$. Just like for $LCA$ groups, it is also possible to characterize the locally compact, compactly generated modules over $\mathbb{Z}S^{-1}$, as well as their Pontryagin Duals (which then allows to conclude that any locally compact $\mathbb{Z}S^{-1}$-module is an inverse limit of modules within a specific family). These characterizations are given in the 2nd and 3rd Structure Theorems respectively. Furthermore, as an elementary consequence of the 1st Structure Theorem, one can obtain a full classification of locally compact vector spaces over $\mathbb{Q}$.2026-02-26T15:21:22Z22 pages, 0 figures, Appendix by Pedro LourençoPedro LourençoUniversity of Portohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00987v2Joins of closed sublocales are not always a coframe2026-02-23T10:57:49ZGiven a locale $L$, the collection $\mathsf{S}_c(L)$ of joins of closed sublocales forms a frame--somewhat unexpectedly, as it is naturally embedded in the coframe of all sublocales of $L$, where by coframe we mean the order-theoretic dual of a frame. This construction has attracted attention in point-free topology: as a maximal essential extension in the category of frames, for its (non-)functorial properties, its relation to canonical extensions and exact filters of frames, etc.
A central open question of the theory, posed by Picado, Pultr, and Tozzi in 2019, asked whether $\mathsf{S}_c(L)$ is always a coframe, or whether there exists a locale for which this fails. In this paper, we resolve this question in the negative by constructing a locale $L$ such that $\mathsf{S}_c(L)$ is not a coframe. The main challenge in such questions lies in the difficulty of understanding exact infima in $\mathsf{S}_c(L)$; we circumvent this by analysing a certain separation property satisfied by $\mathsf{S}_c(L)$.2025-10-01T14:59:51ZOrder, Volume 43, article number 15, (2026)Igor Arrieta10.1007/s11083-025-09725-whttp://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11800v6The topology of finite and infinite-dimensional Stiefel manifolds2026-02-23T10:15:08ZStiefel manifolds arise naturally as spaces of injective operators and as total spaces of principal bundles over Grassmannians. While their finite-dimensional topology is governed by Bott periodicity, the infinite-dimensional theory exhibits a striking collapse phenomenon stemming from Kuiper's contractibility theorem. In this expository article, we present a unified treatment of finite and infinite-dimensional Stiefel manifolds over real and complex Hilbert spaces, emphasizing three structural principles:
(i) the interpretation of Stiefel manifolds as spaces of injective operators,
(ii) the polar decomposition as a canonical factorization yielding a homotopy decomposition,
(iii) the role of Grassmannians as classifying spaces for $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{F})$ in the stable limit.
In particular, we show that the polar decomposition provides a global homeomorphism \[ \operatorname{St}(n,H) \cong \operatorname{St}_{\operatorname{orth}}(n,H) \times \operatorname{P}_n(\mathbb{F}) \] valid in arbitrary Hilbert dimension, and that this factorization isolates the entire difference between finite and infinite-dimensional topology. Then, we discuss the implications for the homotopy type of Stiefel manifolds and the relation of Stiefel manifolds to the theory of classifying spaces and characteristic classes.2023-11-20T14:33:16Z13 pagesNizar El Idrissihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09604v2Toposes with enough points as categories of étale spaces2026-02-23T07:49:07ZWe extend Makkai duality between coherent toposes and ultracategories to a duality between toposes with enough points and ultraconvergence spaces. Our proof generalizes and simplifies Makkai's original proof. Our main result can also be seen as an extension to ionads of Barr's equivalence between topological spaces and relational modules for the ultrafilter monad. In view of the correspondence between toposes and geometric theories, we obtain a strong conceptual completeness theorem, in the sense of Makkai, for geometric theories with enough Set-models. The same result has recently been obtained independently by Saadia (arXiv:2506.23935) and by Hamad (arXiv:2507.07922). Both of their proofs rely on groupoid representations of toposes, which our proof here does not assume.2025-08-13T08:35:40ZSam van GoolJérémie MarquèsUmberto Tarantinohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20980v5A new characterization of (pre)liminary C*-algebras2026-02-22T12:05:08ZGiven an arbitrary countable ordinal $α$, we introduce the notion of type $I_{α}$ C*-algebra and $α$-subhomogeneous C*-algebra. When $α=0$, these recover the notions of Fell C*-algebra and of commutative C*-algebra, respectively. When $α=n<ω$, these recover the notions of type $I_{n}$ C*-algebra and of $n$-subhomogeneous C*-algebra, respectively. We prove that a separable C*-algebra is liminary if and only if it is type $I_{α}$ for some $α<ω_{1}$, and it is preliminary (i.e., has no infinite-dimensional irreducible representation) if and only if it is $α$-subhomogeneous for some $α<ω_{1}$. We also prove that for any countable ordinal $α$ there exists a separable C*-algebra that is type $I_{α}$ and not type $I_{β}$ for $β<α$, and a separable C*-algebra that is $α$-subhomogeneous and not $β$-subhomogeneous for any $β<α$.2025-09-25T10:23:54Z25 pages, slightly changed some of the notation, terminology, and proofsMartino Lupinihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19106v1Soft Uniform Spaces and Soft Uniform Continuity: Induced Topologies, Separation, and Compactness-Type Results2026-02-22T09:32:54ZSoft uniform structures provide a way to speak about uniform closeness in a parameterized setting. Working over a fixed parameter set, we treat entourages as soft relations and introduce a notion of \emph{soft uniformity} whose axioms parallel the classical entourage approach. Every soft uniformity induces a canonical soft topology; moreover, the uniformity is separated exactly when the induced topology is soft $T_1$, and the induced topology is soft regular. We then study soft uniformly continuous mappings and prove a soft Heine--Cantor type theorem: on a soft compact domain, soft continuity already forces soft uniform continuity. Finally, soft total boundedness and soft completeness are formulated via soft Cauchy filters, and we show that soft compactness implies both properties. Examples are included to relate the theory to uniformities generated from classical structures and to highlight the role played by parameters.2026-02-22T09:32:54Z8 pages, no figuresS. Rayhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18828v1Countability Properties of Weakly Compact Sets in Asymmetric Locally Convex Spaces2026-02-21T13:04:32ZA dual pair formulation for asymmetric locally convex spaces is developed that strictly generalises the ordinary vector space setting. The concept of a polar topology carries over to the asymmetric case and some familiar results are reproduced or generalised such as the bipolar theorem and a Mackey-Arens type theorem. The implications of weak compactness and countability properties are studied and appear intimately connected to separation properties. An asymmetric analogue $C_a(K)$ of the well-known space $C_p(K)$ is introduced and the properties of (relatively) (countably respectively sequentially) compact subspaces are investigated. In particular, it is shown that $C_a([0,1])$ is not angelic. However, for Hausdorff subspaces satisfying a simple closure condition, the different compactness conditions are equivalent and imply the Fréchet-Urysohn property. Moreover, an analogue of the Eberlein-Šmulian theorem holds in asymmetrically normed spaces.2026-02-21T13:04:32ZJobst Ziebellhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18245v1Algebraic $K$-theory of stably compact spaces2026-02-20T14:29:00ZWe compute the value of finitary localizing invariants, including algebraic $K$-theory, on categories of sheaves over stably locally compact spaces $X$. Our formula simultaneously generalizes the cases of locally compact Hausdorff and coherent (spectral) spaces and recovers several smaller $K$-theory calculations as special instances.2026-02-20T14:29:00ZGeorg Lehnerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13363v2Center of distances of ultrametric spaces generated by labeled trees2026-02-20T07:13:43ZThe center of distances of a metric space $(X,d)$ is the set $C(X)$ of all $t\in \mathbb R^+$ for which the equation $d(x,p)=t$ has a solution for each $p\in X$. We prove that the equalities $C(X)=\{0\}$ or $C(X)=\{0,\operatorname{diam}X\} $ hold if $(X,d)$ is an ultrametric space generated by labeled trees. The necessary and sufficient conditions under which $\operatorname{diam} X\in C(X)$ are found.2026-01-19T19:57:50ZOleksiy DovgosheyOlga Rovenskahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00528v4Complexity of deep computations via topology of function spaces2026-02-17T21:57:29ZWe use topological methods to study complexity of deep computations and limit computations. We use topology of function spaces, specifically, the classification Rosenthal compacta, to identify new complexity classes. We use the language of model theory, specifically, the concept of \emph{independence} from Shelah's classification theory, to translate between topology and computation. We use the theory of Rosenthal compacta to characterize approximablility of deep computations, both deterministically and probabilistically.2026-01-02T01:49:41ZEduardo DueñezJosé IovinoTonatiuh Matos-WiederholdLuciano SalvettiFranklin D. Tallhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16046v1Productively Scheepers spaces and their relatives2026-02-17T21:56:20ZWe prove that assuming $\mathfrak{b}=\mathfrak{d}$, in the class of hereditarily Lindelöf spaces, each productively Scheepers space is productively Hurewicz. The above statement remains true in the class of all general topological spaces assuming that $\mathfrak{d}=\aleph_1$. To this end we use combinatorial methods and the Menger covering property parametrized by ultrafilters. We also show that if near coherence of filters holds, then the Scheepers property is equivalent to a Menger property parametrized by any ultrafilter.2026-02-17T21:56:20Z13 pMarta Kładź-DudaPiotr SzewczakLyubomyr Zdomskyyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15696v1A Knaster--Reichbach type theorem for graph structures2026-02-17T16:24:42ZWe study the properties of a generic object $\mathbb{P}$ in the category of finite graphs. It turns out that this object, being topologically a Cantor set, has the Knaster--Reichbach type property. Namely, every homeomorphism and isomorphism $h\colon K\to L$ where $K$ and $L$ are nowhere dense closed sets in $\mathbb{P}$ and consisting only of isolated vertices in $K$ and $L$ can be extended to the autohomeomorphism and autoisomorphism of the whole graph $\mathbb{P}$.2026-02-17T16:24:42ZWiesław KubiśAndrzej KucharskiSławomir Turekhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15480v1Meekly SC*-Normal Spaces in Topological Spaces2026-02-17T10:35:31ZThis chapter develops the concept of \textbf{meekly $SC^*$-normality}, a novel generalization of the classical notion of normality in topology. The proposed framework simultaneously broadens $SC^*$-normality and other established forms of normality, offering a unified perspective on generalized separation axioms. Fundamental properties are systematically derived, several equivalent characterizations are obtained, and the relationships between meekly $SC^*$-normal spaces and a range of existing normal-type spaces are rigorously analyzed. By establishing these structural connections, the chapter not only enriches the theory of generalized closed sets and separation axioms but also opens new directions for further research in advanced topological studies.2026-02-17T10:35:31ZNeeraj Kumar TomarSaroj Ranihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07692v2Ideal-Aura Topological Spaces, New Local Functions, and Generalized Open Sets2026-02-16T21:35:04ZWe combine an ideal topological space $(X, τ, \mathcal{I})$ with a scope function $\mathfrak{a}: X \to τ$, $x \in \mathfrak{a}(x)$, to form what we call an ideal-aura topological space $(X, τ, \mathcal{I}, \mathfrak{a})$. The central new object is the aura-local function $A^{\mathfrak{a}}(\mathcal{I}) = \{x \in X : \mathfrak{a}(x) \cap A \notin \mathcal{I}\}$, which extends the Jankovic-Hamlett local function: we always have $A^{*}(\mathcal{I}, τ) \subseteq A^{\mathfrak{a}}(\mathcal{I})$. The closure $\operatorname{cl}^{*}_{\mathfrak{a}}(A) = A \cup A^{\mathfrak{a}}(\mathcal{I})$ is an additive Cech closure operator that, in general, fails to be idempotent; we prove that idempotency is equivalent to transitivity of $\mathfrak{a}$. The resulting Cech topology $τ^{*}_{\mathfrak{a}}$ sits in the chain $τ_{\mathfrak{a}} \subseteq τ^{*}_{\mathfrak{a}} \subseteq τ^{*}$, interpolating between the pure aura topology and the classical ideal topology. We introduce a $ψ_{\mathfrak{a}}$-operator and use it to give an alternative description of $τ^{*}_{\mathfrak{a}}$. Five classes of $\mathcal{I}\mathfrak{a}$-generalized open sets are defined and arranged in a hierarchy, with strict inclusions separated by counterexamples. Decomposition theorems for $\mathcal{I}\mathfrak{a}$-continuity are proved. Three special cases are examined: the trivial ideal recovers the pure aura topology, the improper ideal gives the discrete topology, and the ideal of finite sets exhibits a localization phenomenon.2026-02-07T20:30:54Z19 pages. Third paper in the Aura Topological Spaces seriesAhu AcikgozMurad Ozkoc