https://arxiv.org/api/Mu6ENRXN9EsmDwR/tsEK3gwv8U82026-06-13T12:39:12Z48081515http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06549v1The uncertainty principles of random signals related to the linear canonical transform2026-06-04T08:10:38ZIn this paper, we investigate uncertainty principles for random signals associated with the linear canonical transform (LCT). First, the LCT of random signals is formulated on the probability space. Based on this representation, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is established to characterize the relationship between the expectations in the time and frequency domains. Furthermore, the Donoho-Stark uncertainty principle, developed from a measure theoretic perspective, reveals that a random signal cannot be simultaneously concentrated on arbitrarily small sets in both the time and frequency domains. The bounds obtained in these two uncertainty principles explicitly depend on the LCT parameters, indicating that the LCT offers greater flexibility than the Fourier transform (FT). The corresponding results in the fractional Fourier transform and FT domains are also given as special cases.2026-06-04T08:10:38Z22 pagesJia-Yin PengBing-Zhao Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06544v1Dense signed sums of non-integer powers2026-06-04T06:58:45ZWe prove that if $j>0$ is not an integer, then there is a choice of signs $\varepsilon_k\in\{\pm1\}$ such that the partial sums $ \sum_{k=1}^{N}\varepsilon_k k^j $ are dense in $\mathbb R$. The proof groups consecutive terms into Thue--Morse blocks, whose Prouhet--Tarry--Escott cancellation produces nonzero block sums tending to zero but with divergent total variation. A standard steering argument then chooses block signs so that the resulting partial sums visit arbitrarily small neighbourhoods of every real number.2026-06-04T06:58:45ZDavid Treebyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14248v3New identities for the Laplace transform and their applications2026-06-02T09:28:14ZIn this paper, we begin by applying the Laplace transform to derive closed forms for several challenging integrals that seem nearly impossible to evaluate. By utilizing the solution to the Pythagorean equation $a^2 + b^2 = c^2$, these closed forms become even more intriguing. This approach allows us to provide new integral representations for the error function. Additionally, by leveraging an identity we derived for the inverse Laplace transform and applying a result based on Srivastava and Yürekli's identity, we provide a closed form for a nontrivial generalized integral.2024-05-23T07:26:05Z22 pagesIntegral Transforms and Special Functions 36 (2025), no. 5, 413--438Abdulhafeez A. AbdulsalamAmmar K. Mohammed10.1080/10652469.2024.2429142http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07644v1Multicriticality and Scaling: Mellin Spectral Theory, and the Decoupling of Geometric and Spectral Exponents2026-06-01T19:39:08ZWe develop a spectral theory of scale-invariant operators on the multiplicative half-line $(\mathbb{R}_+, dx/x)$. A symmetric kernel $M(x, y)$ satisfying $M(kx, ky) = k^{-a}M(x, y)$ necessarily factorizes as $(xy)^{-a/2}F(x/y)$, where the shape function $F$ depends only on the ratio of its arguments. The Mellin transform diagonalizes such operators: the generalized eigenfunctions are $ψ_ω(x) = x^{-a/2+iω}$, and the eigenvalues are the Mellin multiplier $\tilde{F}(ω)$. This structure reveals a fundamental decoupling of two exponents. The geometric exponent $a$, carried by the power-law envelope $(xy)^{-a/2}$, governs the matrix scaling under dilation. The spectral exponent $b$, measured from the eigenvalue decay of the finite-dimensional truncation, is an effective quantity determined by the shape of $\tilde{F}(ω)$. For the explicit kernel $F(t) = c ρ^{|\ln t|}$, the Mellin multiplier is a Lorentzian of width $σ= -\ln ρ$, not a power law -- so $b$ is generically distinct from $a$. This decoupling provides a precise mathematical characterization of multicriticality: the equality $a = b$ corresponds to a simple critical fixed point of the Renormalization Group, while $a \neq b$ signals the presence of multiple independent scaling dimensions. We prove that the discrete self-similarity condition forces eigenvector collapse on the lattice, motivating the continuum formulation. Finite-size corrections from lattice sampling are quantified numerically.2026-06-01T19:39:08ZLaurence A. JacobsAlejandro Frankhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1708.02653v22On Hilbert's 8th Problem2026-06-01T13:45:54ZA Hadamard factorisation of the Riemann $ξ$-function is constructed to characterise the zeros of the Riemann zeta function. The argument proceeds via a probabilistic reformulation: the Riemann Hypothesis is shown to be equivalent to Thorin's condition, namely that $ξ(\half)/ξ(\half+\sqrt s\,)$ is the Laplace transform of a generalised gamma convolution (GGC). A GGC random variable realising this Laplace transform is constructed unconditionally, using Lévy representations of the Gamma function, the Euler product for the zeta function, and Ramanujan's Master Theorem, thereby establishing the hypothesis.2017-08-07T12:53:52ZNicholas G. Polsonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1282v13On the arithmetization of syntax2026-06-01T04:47:46ZIt is generally accepted that the incompleteness of first-order number theory (PA) is established by an application of Godel's proof. This paper shows that the arithmetization of the syntax of PA implies that the hypothesised class of PA theorems is not well defined. This is a consequence of the fact that the theoremhood (or non-theoremhood) of a PA formula is implied if the existence of a Godel number of a proof of the formula may be formally proved (or disproved respectively), using the systems own axioms and inference rules. Hence it is a PA theorem that the the negation of a Godel sentence for PA (Not G) implies G itself, i.e. ((Not G) => G) is a PA theorem; from which, both the theoremhood and non-theoremhood of G may be established. The conclusion is taken as evidence of a failure of the devices relied upon for the avoidance of paradox in metamathematical definitions of a proof, a formal theory etc. The main proposition is derived using only assumptions supported by proofs already accepted in the existing literature.2010-10-06T21:11:30ZStephen Boycehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06895v3Explicit Evaluations of Euler Sums Involving Harmonic Numbers with Rational Arguments2026-06-01T01:11:37ZThis paper derives closed-form expressions for four-parameter Euler sums containing generalized harmonic numbers with rational arguments, expressed in terms of the polylogarithm and Lerch transcendent, and reducible (under admissible parameter choices) to Riemann zeta and Hurwitz zeta values. It further obtains closed forms for related polylogarithmic integrals.2026-01-11T12:37:56ZAli Olaikhanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/math/0104025v10On the Goedel's formula2026-05-29T21:57:22ZThe proof of Goedel's first incompleteness theorem includes the construction of an arithmetic formula G that represents the metamathematical statement: the formula G is not provable. This article examines the formula G (of Goedel). We demonstrated that there is no Goedel's number for the formula G if number of provable well formed formulae with one free variable is finite. If there is a non-finite number of provable propositions in the theory, then Goedel's formula also does not possess the Goedel's number.2001-04-02T20:22:43Z4 pages. Section 3 rewrittenJailton C. Ferreirahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05220v1The α -Discounting (α-DMCDM) as an extension of AHP, TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE, and Weighted Sum2026-05-29T17:51:02ZThe Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and other classic Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques excel when decision makers can provide consistent pair wise judgments. Real world problems, however, often involve inconsistent, n-wise, or non-linear preference structures that render traditional methods inadequate. The α-Discounting MCDM (α-D MCDM) extends AHP by embedding a global discounting parameter α that transforms an inconsistent system of preference equations into a solvable algebraic system.2026-05-29T17:51:02Z16 pagesNeutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 98, 2026, pp. 252-267Florentin Smarandachehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2201.09801v12A logical treatment of noise: Solving The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever and its generalizations2026-05-29T13:26:17ZRaymond Smullyan came up with a puzzle that George Boolos called The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever.[1] The puzzle has truthful, lying, and random gods who answer yes or no questions with words that we don't know the meaning of. The challenge is to figure out which type each god is. The puzzle has attracted some general attention -- for example, one popular presentation of the puzzle has been viewed 10 million times.[2] Various "top-down" solutions to the puzzle have been developed.[1,3] We present a systematic bottom-up approach to the puzzle and its generalization. We prove that an n gods puzzle is solvable if and only if the random gods are less than the non-random gods, for arbitrary cardinals. We develop a solution using 4.15 questions on average to the 5 gods variant with 2 random and 3 lying gods. We introduce an algorithm and an implementation for finding solutions to the generalized problem, together with upper bounds. Finally, we note that random gods act like noisy sources, which provides a connection to fault-tolerant computing.2022-01-24T17:01:34ZAdded "A logical treatment of noise" to the title and expanded a little on that, updated bounds, updated referencesDaniel Vallstromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05218v1Counting Votes with Multisets2026-05-29T08:58:26ZA multiset is a 'set' in which elements may occur multiple times. These structures are ideal for expressing the outcome of an election, for instance of the form 60 'yes' and 40 'no'. Moreover, multisets are a useful datatype in vote counting algorithms. This will be illustrated in three different forms of vote counting, known as: 'instant-runoff', 'De Borda', and 'single transferrable vote'. The relevant abstract properties of multisets are: (1) they form a (free) commutative monoid, and (2) they form a functor, and (3) also a monad. This paper illustrates how such categorical properties can be put to good use in deriving and expressing election outcomes. The emphasis is not on the (elementary) category theory involved, but on its application in voting systems.2026-05-29T08:58:26ZBart JacobsMichael JohnsonRichard Bucklandhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01890v46A Simple Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis2026-05-28T10:35:47ZIn this article, it is proved that the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function must lie on the critical line, known as the Riemann hypothesis.2022-09-05T10:40:42ZHatem A. Fayedhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22948v2A Compositional Characterization of the Z-relation via Closure and Additivity2026-05-27T21:53:39ZThis paper gives a structural explanation for the Z-relation by modelling pitch-class sets as complete weighted graphs and encoding their interval content in a composition of $n$ via an additivity rule. We introduce the realization number $\mathcal{R}(μ,n)$ -- the count of T/I-inequivalent compositions producing the same interval multiset $μ$ -- and show that Z-relation is precisely the condition $\mathcal{R}(μ,n)\geq 2$. We prove that Z-relation cannot occur at cardinality $k=3$ in any $\mathbb{Z}_n$, construct an explicit primitive Z-related pair at $k=4$ for every $n$ divisible by $4$ with $n\geq 8$, and establish a Scaling Theorem showing that any Z-pair in $\mathbb{Z}_m$ propagates to $\mathbb{Z}_{dm}$ for all $d\geq 1$. All results are verified computationally for $\mathbb{Z}_{12}$ and $\mathbb{Z}_{19}$.2026-05-21T18:24:35ZSpecial thanks to Emmanuel Amiot and Drew Flieder for advice and feedbackAleksa Joksimovićhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05214v1Analytic umbral transmutations and Bessel moments2026-05-27T21:44:19ZWe develop an analytic umbral approach to Bessel moments, using them as a concrete testbed justifying the passage from formal indicial umbral calculus to Mellin--Barnes umbral transmutation theory. [...] While the formal procedure reproduces the correct results in suitable convergence chambers, it may lead to non-admissible hypergeometric expansions at physically relevant parameter values. The cubic moment provides the basic example [...]
We show that this obstruction is removed by replacing the purely formal expansion with an analytic umbral transmutation. In this setting, exponential umbral pairings are interpreted through Mellin--Barnes integrals, and Ramanujan's Master Theorem acts as an inverse selection principle for the spectral ground state, or clock, associated with a given Bessel product. The factorisation \(J_0^3=J_0J_0^2\) produces two distinct clocks and reduces the cubic full-line moment to a one-dimensional Barnes integral, equivalently to a Meijer \(G\)-function. This gives the classical value of the cubic Bessel moment and clarifies why the divergent Appell realisation is only a local representation of a globally meaningful umbral identity.
The same mechanism is then applied to scaled cubic products and to the fourth Bessel moment. [...] The fifth moment marks the first genuinely higher-rank case: the natural umbral grouping leads to a bivariate Barnes transmutation rather than to an ordinary Meijer \(G\)-function.
Finally, we discuss real fractional powers \(J_0^α\), \(α>2\), showing that the same interpretation persists beyond integer moments. [...] The resulting picture identifies Bessel moments as values of effective umbral transmutations and separates the global analytic meaning of the umbral representation from the local convergence properties of its hypergeometric residue expansions.2026-05-27T21:44:19ZSubmitted to Journal of Mathematical Analysis and ApplicationsRoberto RicciGiuseppe Dattolihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05213v1Umbral methods, function factorisation and generalisation of the Fourier transform method2026-05-27T14:03:36ZWe propose a systematic way to construct trigonometric-like functions beyond the classical sine--cosine pair by factorising rational umbral operators. The guiding idea is simple: the usual trigonometric functions may be viewed as cyclic components arising from a finite factorisation, and the same principle can be extended to an $n$-fold decomposition of rational umbral expressions. For each integer $n\geq 2$, the construction produces $n$ functions which play the role of higher-order trigonometric components: their sum reconstructs the corresponding umbral function, while the individual components isolate the different cyclic sectors of its expansion.
The construction is developed first in the formal umbral setting. The quadratic case $n=2$ gives the Gaussian trigonometric functions, in which the cosine-like component is a Gaussian and the sine-like component is its natural umbral companion. The cubic case $n=3$ yields a three-component cyclic system and shows how the same idea extends beyond the usual even--odd decomposition. These examples suggest that trigonometric factorisation is not restricted to ordinary rotations, but belongs to a broader cyclic principle in umbral calculus.
We then reinterpret the same formal identities through the recently developed analytic umbral framework. In this second step, the cyclic components are realised by Mellin--Barnes pairings, and the root-of-unity decomposition is related to the splitting of the corresponding spectral kernel. This analytic formulation provides contour representations, local expansions, and sectorial asymptotics for the functions obtained formally. Finally, we indicate how the same cyclic kernels act on Fourier transforms. The resulting framework presents higher-order umbral trigonometric functions as natural cyclic components of factorised rational or exponential umbral operators.2026-05-27T14:03:36ZSubmitted to MDPI AxiomsGiuseppe DattoliRoberto RicciTommaso Severati