https://arxiv.org/api/JDSsqqkK1fHjdtDtL9pOl+sJq242026-06-21T07:51:52Z791053015http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19851v1An exact robust Ramsey theorem for matchings2026-06-18T07:00:39ZKeevash and Michaeli recently proved that, under the robustness assumption that \(G\) is an \(s\)-connector (i.e. \(\overline G\) is \(K_{s,s}\)-free), \(G\) has essentially the same multicolour Ramsey matching properties as complete graphs, with an additive error \(O(qs)\), where \(q\) is the number of colours. They asked whether the dependence on \(q\) can be removed. We answer this question in a stronger exact form. For \({\bf t}=(t_1,\ldots,t_q)\in\mathbb N_+^q\), let \(R_s({\bf t})\) be the smallest integer \(N\) such that every \(N\)-vertex \(s\)-connector \(G\) satisfies \(
G\to (t_1K_2,\ldots,t_qK_2). \) We determine the exact value \[
R_s({\bf t})=\sum_{j\in[q]}(t_j-1)+
\max\left\{2s,\ s+\max_{j\in[q]}t_j\right\}. \] While Keevash and Michaeli's proof uses a compression algorithm based on the Gallai--Edmonds decomposition to reduce the colouring to a structured form, our proof is a direct minimal-counterexample argument together with a new counting method for monochromatic matchings which can be applied to \(s\)-connectors.2026-06-18T07:00:39Z13 pagesMengyuan NiuLanchao Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19820v1On applications of the clique-adjacency polynomial to arbitrary finite graphs2026-06-18T05:51:44ZThe clique adjacency polynomial (CAP), introduced by Soicher (2015), provides a powerful method for bounding the clique numbers of edge-regular graphs. In this paper, we extend the CAP framework to arbitrary finite graphs by expressing the relevant parameters in terms of average vertex degree and average edge-degree over potential cliques. This leads to a generalised CAP bound and an associated clique existence polynomial (CEP), which removes the dependence on an auxiliary integer variable and facilitates computation. We compare the resulting bounds with classical spectral and linear programming bounds, including those of Delsarte, Hoffman, and Haemers. We show that the generalised CAP improves upon these bounds for several families of graphs. In particular, we identify infinite families of edge-regular graphs arising from projective geometry for which the CAP outperforms the Delsarte bound, as well as families of regular and non-regular graphs where the generalised CAP improves upon the Hoffman and Haemers bounds. We also develop techniques for bounding feasible parameter regions, enabling practical application of the method to both structured and unstructured graphs.2026-06-18T05:51:44Z14 pages, 6 figures, 2 tablesJake RiggJohn Bamberghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22730v2Path-Minimality of $p$-Energy for Connected Graphs2026-06-18T05:15:38ZLet $G$ be a simple connected graph on $n$ vertices, and let $λ_1(G),λ_2(G),\ldots,λ_n(G)$ be the eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix $A(G)$. For $p>0$, define the $p$-energy of $G$ by $\mathcal E_p(G)=\sum_{i=1}^n |λ_i(G)|^p$. We prove that, for every real number $p\ge 2$ and every simple connected graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, $$ \mathcal E_p(G)\ge \mathcal E_p(P_n), $$ where $P_n$ denotes the path on $n$ vertices. Moreover, for each fixed $p>2$, equality holds if and only if $G\cong P_n$. Together with the previously known star-minimality results, this completes the solution of two questions of Nikiforov.
The proof combines two different comparison principles. For $2<p<4$, we use a bipartite reduction, a Mellin representation of fractional powers, and a determinant comparison involving matching generating polynomials and tree shifts. For $p\ge4$, we prove a second-order stop-loss comparison for the squared singular values of bipartite graphs. This comparison is established by rank-one spectral-shift estimates, deletion-minimal counterexamples, and a finite certified analysis of the terminal sparse-sun configurations.2026-05-21T17:03:10Z65 pages, 2 figures. Applications have been moved to a separate companion paper, which will appear shortlyYinchen LiuQuanyu Tanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19796v1Injectivity of symmetric polynomial maps on partitions2026-06-18T04:59:10ZIntroduced by Ballantine, Beck, and Merca, the elementary symmetric partition function $\mathrm{pre}_k$, defined on the set of partitions with at least $k$ parts, has been a topic of recent interest. We prove that $\mathrm{pre}_k$ is injective on the set of $m$-ary partitions for positive integers $m \ge k$, generalizing the binary $k = 2$ result of Ballantine, Beck, and Merca, and complementing a result of Hadelyn, Niergarth, Li and Li showing that, for each $k \ge 3$, $\mathrm{pre}_k$ is not injective on partitions of $n$ with length $2k$ for infinitely many $n$. We introduce the skew Schur partition function $\mathrm{prs}_{λ'/μ'}$, prove injectivity results for particular choices of $λ',μ'$, and describe an application to representation theory.2026-06-18T04:59:10Z19 pagesRohith ThomasKatherine Tunghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15394v2Dominant Zeros of Nekrasov--Okounkov Polynomials2026-06-18T03:57:56ZWe give an exact finite-dimensional Perron--Frobenius realization of the dominant zero of the Nekrasov--Okounkov polynomials $\nop _n(z)$. For a normalized positive sequence $h=(h(n))_{n\ge 1}$ with $h(1)=1$, define $\pol _0^h(z)=1$ and, for $n\ge 1$, \[ \pol _n^h(z)=\frac{z}{h(n)}\sum_{k=1}^n σ(k)\pol _{n-k}^h(z),\] where $σ(k)$ denotes the sum of divisors of $k$. The Nekrasov--Okounkov polynomials are obtained from the specialization $h(n)=n$ by the shift $\nop _n(z)=\pol _n^h(z+1)$. We derive a Hessenberg determinant representation for $\pol _n^h(z)$. After separating the trivial zero at the origin, the remaining zeros of $\pol _n^h(-z)$ are identified with the eigenvalues of an explicit $(n-1)\times(n-1)$ nonnegative matrix $M_n^h$. We prove that $M_n^h$ is primitive and apply Perron--Frobenius theory to show that $\pol _n^h(z)$ has a unique zero of maximal modulus; this zero is real, negative, and simple. As a consequence, the same property holds for the Nekrasov--Okounkov polynomials. We also prove strict monotonicity of the associated spectral radii.2026-06-13T16:56:59ZBernhard HeimMarkus Neuhauserwith an appendix by Ken Onohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19742v1An upper bound on the largest eigenvalue of the Helmholtzian of a graph2026-06-18T03:14:19ZThe Helmholtzian of a graph $G$ is the Hodge $1$-Laplacian $L_1=L_1^{\mathrm{up}}+L_1^{\mathrm{down}}$ of its clique complex, built from the triangle--edge and edge--vertex boundary operators $\partial_2$ and $\partial_1$. Problem~5.5 of Lu, Shi, Stanić, Wang and Wang asks whether $λ_{\max}(L_1)=μ_1(G)$ for every graph $G$, where $μ_1(G)$ is the largest Laplacian eigenvalue; by the Hodge decomposition this is equivalent to $λ_{\max}(L_1^{\mathrm{up}})\leμ_1(G)$. We recast it as a question about the complement of $G$: localizing $L_1^{\mathrm{up}}$ on the cycle space of $K_n$ turns it into the inequality $λ_{\min}(\bar L|_{Z_1})\ge a(\overline{G})$, where $\bar L$ is the up Laplacian of the missing triangles of $G$ and $a(\overline{G})=n-μ_1(G)$ is the algebraic connectivity of the complement. From this viewpoint, we prove the unconditional bound \[ λ_{\max}\!\big(L_1^{\mathrm{up}}(G)\big)\ \le\ μ_1(G)+\frac13\big(n-μ_1(G)\big), \] which refines the integrality ceiling $λ_{\max}(L_1^{\mathrm{up}})\le n$ of Duval and Reiner and is sharp exactly when that ceiling is attained. We then isolate the single sharp inequality, on the dense part of $\overline{G}$, that stops the method short of Problem~5.5, and we show that the localization, the bound, and this obstruction all persist for the up Laplacian of an arbitrary finite simplicial complex, in every dimension.2026-06-18T03:14:19ZSuil Ohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19717v1Counting triangles in graphs with no wheels of order at least five2026-06-18T02:33:02ZFor a family of graphs $\mathcal F$, a graph $G$ is said to be $\mathcal F$-free if it contains no member of $\mathcal F$ as a subgraph. A wheel graph $W_k$ is a graph on $k+1$ vertices formed by joining a new vertex to all vertices of a $k$-cycle. Given an integer $k\ge 3$, we consider the problem of determining the maximum number of triangles in a $W_{\geq k}$-free graph, where $W_{\geq k}=\{W_\ell: \ell \geq k\}$. The case $k=3$ was raised by Gallai, who proposed a conjecture for this case (see Erdős [5]. Gallai's conjecture was disproved by Zhou [17] and independently by Füredi, Goemans, and Kleitman [9]. In this paper, we study the case $k=4$. Namely, for every integer $n\ge 3$, we determine the maximum number of triangles in an $n$-vertex $W_{\geq 4}$-free graph and characterize all extremal graphs.2026-06-18T02:33:02Z14 pagesChunyang DouBo NingXing Penghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11470v2Tight minimum degree conditions for apex-outerplanar minors and subdivisions in graphs and digraphs2026-06-18T02:27:29ZMotivated by Hadwiger's conjecture and related problems for list-coloring, we study graphs $H$ for which every graph with minimum degree at least $|V(H)|-1$ contains $H$ as a minor. We prove that a large class of apex-outerplanar graphs satisfies this property. Our result gives the first examples of such graphs whose vertex cover numbers are significantly larger than half of the number of its vertices, which breaks a barrier for attacking related coloring problems via extremal functions, and recovers all known such graphs that have arbitrarily large maximum degree. Our proof can be adapted to directed graphs to show that if $\vec H$ is the digraph obtained from a directed cycle or an in-arborescence by adding an apex source, then every digraph with minimum out-degree $|V(\vec H)|-1$ contains $\vec H$ as a subdivision or a butterfly minor respectively. These results provide the optimal upper bound for the chromatic number and dichromatic number of graphs and digraphs that do not contain the aforementioned graphs or digraphs as a minor, butterfly minor and a subdivision, respectively. Special cases of our results solve an open problem of Aboulker, Cohen, Havet, Lochet, Moura and Thomassé and strengthen results of Gishboliner, Steiner and Szabó.2024-03-18T04:42:24ZChun-Hung LiuYoungho Yoohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19696v1Two-colored generalized Frobenius partitions and minimal-excludant sums over bipartitions2026-06-18T01:48:09ZLet $\cpsi_{2,a}(n)$ denote the number of $(2,a)$-colored Frobenius partitions of weight $n$, where the two rows have prescribed length difference. We study the two cases $a=0$ and $a=1$ and connect them with minimal-excludant statistics on bipartitions. Let $σ\mex_2(n)$ be the sum of the Lin--Liu bipartition minimal excludants over all bipartitions of $n$, and let $E_2(n)$ be the number of bipartitions whose two component minimal excludants are equal. For all $n\geq 0$, we give a combinatorial proof of \[ \cpsi_{2,0}(n)=2σ\mex_2(n) \qquad\text{and}\qquad \cpsi_{2,1}(n)=2σ\mex_2(n)-E_2(n). \] These identities give direct combinatorial interpretations of two-colored Frobenius partition functions in terms of bipartition minimal-excludant sums.2026-06-18T01:48:09ZRong ChenKang-Yu WangYi-ning Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19677v1Randomly piercing algebraic sets2026-06-18T01:01:00ZWe show, for example, that if one samples \[\frac{\log p}{2\log(1+(p-1)^{-1})} \cdot n^2(1 + o_{n\to \infty}(1))\] points in $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ at random then asymptotically almost surely this set intersects every quadratic hypersurface. We furthermore show that this is tight in that sampling $o_{n\to\infty}(n^2)$ fewer points almost surely fails to intersect some quadratic hypersurface.
Our main result is a sharp threshold for the following problem: how many points in $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ does one need to randomly sample to almost surely intersect every algebraic set defined by at most $s$ polynomials each of degree at most $k$? As an application we improve lower bounds in the random Szemerédi theorem in $\mathbb{F}_p^n$, in particular obtaining a leading constant which grows as the threshold for what is considered a `dense' set in Szemerédi's theorem shrinks.2026-06-18T01:01:00Z20 pagesDaniel AltmanNathan Tunghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29938v2Probabilistic counting lemma for $K_4$2026-06-18T00:49:41ZThe sparse analogue of Szemerédi's regularity method has played a central role in the development of extremal results for random graphs. While the sparse embedding lemma (the KLR conjecture) has been resolved, the corresponding sparse counting lemma remains widely open. The conjecture, formulated by Gerke, Marciniszyn, and Steger, states that for every fixed graph $H$ and any $β>0$, there exists $\varepsilon>0$ such that the following holds. Consider a balanced blow-up of $H$ with vertex classes of size $n$, where each pair corresponding to an edge of $H$ forms an $(\varepsilon)$-regular bipartite graph with exactly $m$ edges. Assume that $m$ is above the natural threshold $m \gg n^{2-1/m_2(H)}$, then all but a $β^m$ proportion of such graphs contain at least $(1-δ)$ times the expected number of copies of $H$. In this paper, we establish the $H=K_4$ case of the conjecture.2026-03-31T16:10:35ZWarach Veeranonchaihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09254v2Highly connected non-formal Milnor fibers via polyhedral products2026-06-17T22:57:50ZWe show that the realization theorem of Fernández de Bobadilla, which identifies the Milnor fiber of a weighted-homogeneous polynomial with the complement of a germ of analytic set, can be combined with the systematic Massey product constructions of Grbić-Linton for moment-angle complexes $\mathcal{Z}_K = \mathcal{Z}_K(D^2, S^1)$ to produce weighted-homogeneous polynomials whose Milnor fibers are arbitrarily highly connected and non-formal. The original application of this strategy, due to Fernández de Bobadilla, used the Denham-Suciu classification of lowest-degree triple Massey products and yielded only 2-connected non-formal Milnor fibers. The Grbić-Linton framework, which constructs non-trivial $n$-fold Massey products in $H^*(\mathcal{Z}_K;\mathbb{Z})$ for arbitrary $n$ and in arbitrary cohomological degrees, removes this connectivity restriction entirely.2026-05-10T01:48:37Z23 pages, expanded and revisedAlexander I. Suciuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04561v3Differential operators, anisotropy, and simplicial spheres2026-06-17T22:48:10ZWe find identities involving differential operators in the generic artinian reduction of the Stanley-Reisner ring of a simplicial sphere in any positive characteristic. These identities generalize the characteristic 2 identities used by Papadakis and Petrotou to give a proof of the algebraic g-conjecture. We show that these identities are a shadow of an identity on the degree map, and we use them to prove the anisotropy of certain forms on the generic artinian reduction of the Stanley--Reisner ring and to prove weak Lefschetz results.2024-12-05T19:04:44ZTo appear in IMRNKalle KaruMatt LarsonAlan Stapledonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06514v2Combinatorial Characterizations and Branched Manifolds2026-06-17T21:57:02ZA family of compact n-manifolds is locally combinatorially defined (LCD) if it can be specified by a finite number of local triangulations. We show that LCD is equivalent to the existence of a compact branched n-manifold W, such that the family is precisely those manifolds that immerse into W. In subsequent papers, the equivalence will be used to show that, for each of the eight Thurston geometries, the family of closed 3-manifolds admitting that geometry is LCD.2025-10-07T23:11:07Z17 pages, 2 figures. Section 5 on branched manifolds was expanded to include results needed for subsequent papers. The definition of a PL branched manifold was also generalizedDaryl CooperLeslie MavrakisPriyam Patelhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27260v2Exact Flatness Constant for One-Point Convex Bodies and the Discrete Isominwidth Problem: The Planar Case2026-06-17T21:50:52ZA variant of the flatness problem from integer programming is studied, in which one considers convex bodies in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with at most $k$ interior lattice points. The maximum lattice width of such a body is denoted by Flt(d,k) and it is related to the classical flatness constant as well as a conjectural dual version of Minkowski's convex body theorem due to Makai. Moreover, it is shown that Flt(2, 1) = 3, i.e., any planar convex body with at most one interior point has lattice width at most three. This leads to an isominwidth inequality for the lattice point enumerator of planar convex bodies.2026-04-29T23:21:57ZGennadiy AverkovGiulia CodenottiAnsgar FreyerKyle Huang