https://arxiv.org/api/OTasc8Mk6KkmzRVmsJVVtgIYQTQ2026-06-21T13:42:37Z6046287015http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24922v1The Angular Observables of $Λ_b \to Λ_c(\to Λ^0 π^+) \, τ^-(\to π^- ν_τ)\, \barν_τ$ within the Paradigm of FCCC Anomalies2026-04-27T19:03:44ZWe present a global analysis of the current $B$-meson flavor anomalies and extend it to the baryonic sector through the decay $Λ_b^0 \to Λ_c^+(\to Λ^0 π^+) τ^-(\to π^- ν_τ)\barν_τ$. The lepton flavor universality ratios $R_{τ/(μ,e)}(D^{(*)})$, measured by BaBar, Belle, and LHCb, exhibit a combined $3.8σ$ deviation from Standard Model (SM) predictions. Using the latest HFLAV averages and $B_c$-lifetime constraints, $\mathcal{B}(B_c \to τν) < 60\%, 30\%, 10\%$, found new physics (NP) solutions to the cascade decay $Λ_b^0 \to Λ_c^+(\to Λ^0 π^+) τ^-(\to π^- ν_τ)\barν_τ$. The scenario $(C_{V_L},C_{S_R})$ emerges as the most favored NP solution, largest pull from the SM and insensitive to branching-ratio constraints; followed by $C_{V_L}$ case. We study the impact of NP operators on a complete set of angular observables on the five-fold $Λ_b$ decay using Lattice-QCD form factors and find that the scenarios $(\Re[C_{S_L}=4C_T],\Im[C_{S_L}=4C_T])$ and $(C_{S_L},C_{S_R})$ generate the largest deviations from the SM predictions. In particular, the observables $\mathcal{K}_{1c}$, $\mathcal{K}_{2ss}$, $\mathcal{K}_{2cc}$, and $\mathcal{K}_{4s}$ show the highest sensitivity to NP effects. The correlation analysis reveals the $(\Re[C_{S_L}=4C_T],\Im[C_{S_L}=4C_T])$ scenario exhibits inverse correlations among $\mathcal{K}_{1c}$ and $\mathcal{K}_{2ss,2cc,4s}$ and direct correlations between $\mathcal{K}_{2ss}$ and $\mathcal{K}_{2cc,4s}$, pointing to a possible CP-violating phase, while the $(C_{S_L},C_{S_R})$ scenario displays complementary behavior consistent with CP-conserving dynamics. These results establish baryonic semileptonic decays as a powerful and independent probe of the $R_{τ/(μ,e)}(D^{(*)})$ anomalies, with future measurements providing critical tests of the underlying NP structure.2026-04-27T19:03:44Z23 pages, 5 figures and accepted for publication in EPJCEur. Phys. J. C 86, 463 (2026)Muhammad ArslanIshtiaq AhmedMuhammad Jamil Aslam10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15601-7http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24849v1Accidental Peccei-Quinn Symmetry from Chiral Gauge Symmetry and Mirror QCD2026-04-27T18:00:02ZWe present a solution to the strong CP problem in which a simple chiral U(1) gauge symmetry gives rise to an accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry that is both explicitly and spontaneously broken by mirror QCD dynamics, yielding a framework without massless fermions or a light QCD axion. The model contains no stable domain walls or colored relics, and it accommodates a sufficiently high reheating temperature to account for the baryon asymmetry of the Universe via leptogenesis. Metastable domain walls and first-order mirror QCD phase transition generate a stochastic background of primordial gravitational waves. Additionally, one of the pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons serves as a viable WIMP dark matter candidate. The gauge boson associated with the chiral U(1) gauge symmetry, which kinetically mixes with the Standard Model hypercharge gauge boson, provides a vector portal connecting dark matter to the Standard Model and plays a central role in the dark-matter phenomenology. Colored pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons can be probed at the LHC through searches for dijet resonances, jets plus missing energy, multijet events with leptons, and displaced vertices.2026-04-27T18:00:02Z27 pages, 4 figuresHajime FukudaKeisuke Harigayahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06947v2Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from Higgs boson decays using the 4$τ$ and 2$μ$2$τ$ final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV2026-04-27T14:57:41ZA search for a pair of light pseudoscalar bosons (a$_1$) produced in the decay of the 125 GeV Higgs boson is presented. The analysis examines decay modes where one a$_1$ decays into a pair of tau leptons and the other decays into either another pair of tau leptons or a pair of muons. The a$_1$ boson mass probed in this study ranges from 4 to 15 GeV. The data sample was recorded by the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. No excess above standard model (SM) expectations is observed. The study combines the 4$τ$ and 2$μ$2$τ$ channels to set upper limits at 95% confidence level (CL) on the product of the Higgs boson production cross section and the branching fraction to the 4$τ$ final state, relative to the Higgs boson production cross section predicted by the SM. In this interpretation, the a$_1$ boson is assumed to have Yukawa-like couplings to fermions, with coupling strengths proportional to the respective fermion masses. The observed (expected) upper limits range between 0.007 (0.011) and 0.079 (0.066) across the mass range considered. The results are also interpreted in the context of models with two Higgs doublets and an additional complex singlet field (2HD+S). The tightest constraints are obtained for the Type III 2HD+S model. In this case, assuming the Higgs boson production cross section equals the SM prediction, values of the branching ratio for the Higgs boson decay into a pair of a$_1$ bosons exceeding 16% are excluded at 95% CL for a$_1$ boson masses between 5 and 15 GeV and $\tanβ$ $\gt$ 2, with the exception of scenarios in which the a$_1$ boson mixes with charm or bottom quark-antiquark bound states.2025-08-09T11:43:00ZReplaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/SUS-24-002 (CMS Public Pages)JHEP 04 (2026) 132 CMS Collaboration10.1007/JHEP04(2026)132http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00501v2Dispersive analysis of the $J/ψ\toπ^0 γ^\ast$ transition form factor with $ρ$-$ω$ mixing effects2026-04-27T14:32:53ZMotivated by the discrepancies noted recently between the theoretical predictions of the electromagnetic $J/ψ\to π^0 γ^*$ transition form factor and the BESIII data, we reanalyze this transition form factor using the dispersive Khuri-Treiman equations, with final-state interactions in both the direct channel and the crossed channels properly considered. This improved framework incorporates $ρ$-$ω$ mixing effects. The effect of four-pion states is evaluated through a dispersively improved vector-meson-dominance model. From this information, we propose a two-parameter fit that provides an excellent description of the BESIII data over the broad energy range from 0 to 2.8GeV. We demonstrate that the $ρπ^0$ decay mode of the $J/ψ$ is dominated by strong interaction, while the $ωπ^0$ mode is dominated by one-photon exchange. From this, we extract the relative phase between the strong and the one-virtual-photon (electromagnetic) modes in hadronic decays of $J/ψ$ as $(62 \pm 21)^{\circ}$. This could provide useful information in understanding the long-standing $ρπ$ puzzle in $J/ψ$ decays.2025-11-29T14:16:10Z37 pages, 10 figures, 4 tables; references added, version accepted in Phys. Rev. DPhys. Rev. D 113, 074030 (2026)Xiong-Hui CaoFeng-Kun GuoChristoph HanhartBastian Kubis10.1103/gmj6-hd9jhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24531v1Search for associated production of a Higgs boson and two vector bosons via vector boson scattering at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV2026-04-27T14:30:10ZA search for Higgs boson (H) production in association with two vector bosons (V = W, Z) via vector boson scattering (VBS) is presented using proton-proton collision data collected at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV by the CMS experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Events containing two forward jets consistent with VBS, a large-radius jet from the decay of a boosted H to a pair of b quarks, and 0, 1, or 2 charged leptons coming from V decays are selected. The process is excluded at 95% CL for observed (expected) values of the VVHH coupling modifier $κ_\mathrm{VV}$ outside the interval 0.40 $\lt$ $κ_\mathrm{VV}$ $\lt$ 1.60 (0.34 $\lt$ $κ_\mathrm{VV}$ $\lt$ 1.66), assuming standard model values for all other couplings, thus establishing a novel probe of the VVHH interaction. Constraints are also set on the individual $κ_\mathrm{2W}$ and $κ_\mathrm{2Z}$ coupling modifiers, and on the allowed region in the $κ_\mathrm{2W}$-$κ_\mathrm{2Z}$ plane.2026-04-27T14:30:10ZSubmitted to Physical Review Letters. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-24-003 (CMS Public Pages) CMS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15976v2Searches for CEνNS and Physics beyond the Standard Model using Skipper-CCDs at CONNIE2026-04-27T14:21:43ZThe Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Interaction Experiment (CONNIE) aims to detect the coherent scattering (CE$ν$NS) of reactor antineutrinos off silicon nuclei using thick fully-depleted high-resistivity silicon CCDs. Two Skipper-CCD sensors with sub-electron readout noise capability were installed at the experiment next to the Angra-2 reactor in 2021, making CONNIE the first experiment to employ Skipper-CCDs for reactor neutrino detection. We report on the performance of the Skipper-CCDs, the new data processing and data quality selection techniques and the event selection for CE$ν$NS interactions, which enable CONNIE to reach a record low detection threshold of 15 eV. The data were collected over 300 days in 2021-2022 and correspond to exposures of 14.9 g-days with the reactor-on and 3.5 g-days with the reactor-off. The difference between the reactor-on and off event rates shows no excess and yields upper limits at 95% confidence level for the neutrino interaction rates comparable with previous CONNIE limits from standard CCDs and higher exposures. Searches for new neutrino interactions beyond the Standard Model were performed, yielding an improvement on the previous CONNIE limit on a simplified model with light vector mediators. A first dark matter (DM) search by diurnal modulation was performed by CONNIE and the results represent the best limits on the DM-electron scattering cross-section, obtained by a surface-level experiment. These promising results, obtained using a very small-mass sensor, illustrate the potential of Skipper-CCDs to probe rare neutrino interactions and motivate the plans to increase the detector mass in the near future.2024-03-24T01:19:15ZAlexis A. Aguilar-ArevaloNicolas AvalosXavier BertouCarla BonifaziGustavo CanceloBrenda A. Cervantes-VergaraClaudio ChavezFernando ChierchieGustavo Coelho CorrêaJuan Carlos D'OlivoJoão dos AnjosJuan EstradaGuillermo Fernandez MoroniAldo R. Fernandes NetoRichard FordBen KilminsterKevin KukAndrew LathropPatrick LemosHerman P. LimaMartin MaklerKatherine MaslovaFranciole MarinhoJorge MolinaIrina NastevaAna Carolina OliveiraLaura PaulucciDario RodriguesY. SarkisMiguel Sofo-HaroDiego StalderJavier TiffenbergSho UemuraPedro Venturahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24435v1Measurement of jet photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions without nuclear breakup at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector2026-04-27T13:02:59ZIn ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions at the LHC, each nucleus acts as a source of high-energy quasi-real photons that can participate in scattering processes without causing either participating nucleus to break up and emit forward neutrons. This paper extends recent measurements of $γ+A\rightarrow\mathrm{jets}$ production in ultra-peripheral Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV with forward neutron emission on exactly one side of the event. The data presented here was recorded by the ATLAS collaboration at the LHC in 2018, corresponding to a luminosity of $1.72$ nb$^{-1}$. These results examines $5.02$ TeV Pb+Pb collisions where neither nucleus breaks up ($0n0n$), providing a mixture of photon--pomeron ($γ+I\!\!P\rightarrow\mathrm{jets}$), photon--photon ($γ+γ\rightarrow\mathrm{jets}$), and peripheral photonuclear ($γ+A\rightarrow\mathrm{jets}$) events. The different processes are statistically separated via a template fit of the minimum rapidity gap distribution. The kinematics of the hard processes are determined from $R = 0.4$ jets reconstructed using the anti-$k_t$ algorithm. The statistical separation of the different processes then allows for the first measurement of $γ+I\!\!P\rightarrow\mathrm{jets}$ cross-sections in nuclear collisions at the LHC. The rate for electromagnetic dissociation of $0n0n$ $γ+A\rightarrow\mathrm{jets}$ events is also measured and compared to the analogous result from collisions with single-sided neutron emission. These comparisons support the hypothesis that $γ+A\rightarrow\mathrm{jets}$ events without forward neutron emission select a more peripheral class of $γ+A$ collisions.2026-04-27T13:02:59Z44 pages in total, author list starting page 28, 15 figures, 1 table, submitted to Phys. Rev. C. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HION-2026-01 ATLAS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24383v1Same-Sign Tetralepton Signature at $μ$TRISTAN2026-04-27T12:15:32ZNaturally tiny neutrino masses can be explained by the low scale seesaw with heavy neutral lepton $N$ coupling to the neutrinophilic Higgs doublet $Φ_ν$, which obtains a much smaller vacuum expectation value than the standard Higgs doublet $Φ$. Within this model, the neutrino masses originate from the new Yukawa interaction $y \overline{L}\tildeΦ_νN$. In this paper, we propose the novel same-sign tetralepton signature at the 2 TeV same-sign muon mode $μ^+μ^+$ of $μ$TRISTAN. We investigate two distinct channels of this signature, which are both generated by the Yukawa interaction $y \overline{L}\tildeΦ_νN$. One is from the pair production of charged Higgs $μ^+μ^+\to H^+ H^+\to μ^+N +μ^+ N\to μ^+ μ^+ jj + μ^+ μ^+ jj\to 4μ^+ + 4j$, and the other one is from the single production of charged Higgs $μ^+μ^+ \to μ^+ N H^+ \to μ^+N +μ^+ N\to μ^+ μ^+ jj + μ^+ μ^+ jj\to 4μ^+ + 4j$. We then perform a detailed simulation of this same-sign tetralepton signature, and obtain the promising region at $μ$TRISTAN.2026-04-27T12:15:32Z14 pages, 3 figuresLin-Kun YanZhi-Long HanFeng-Lan ShaoFa-Xin Yanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24335v1CP violation in $Σ^+\to p\ell^+\ell^-$ within the standard model and beyond2026-04-27T11:25:00ZThe LHCb collaboration has recently observed the rare hyperon decay $Σ^+\to pμ^+μ^-$. It can also measure the corresponding antihyperon channel with comparable precision and is thus in a position to extract information on $CP$ violation in this mode. Interestingly, the long-distance contributions that dominate it within the standard model provide large absorptive phases that could drive substantial $CP$ violation through interference with potential new-physics contributions. Here we explore this possibility, finding that the decay rate asymmetry is currently allowed to be as high as tens of percent, which can be probed by LHCb in the near future. We additionally consider the same with regard to the dielectron mode $Σ^+\to pe^+e^-$ as well as the related radiative one $Σ^+\to pγ$.2026-04-27T11:25:00Z18 pages, no figureXiao-Gang HeJusak TandeanGerman Valenciahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08406v2Temperature Dependence of Gain and Time Resolution in LGAD Detectors2026-04-27T11:21:34ZLow-Gain Avalanche Diodes (LGADs) provide moderate internal gain and time resolutions of a few tens of picoseconds, making them a key technology for ultrafast timing in high-energy physics and beyond. However, both their gain and timing characteristics vary strongly with reverse-bias voltage and temperature. This work establishes a compact analytical framework that describes multi-temperature LGAD gain and timing behavior through an equivalent representation of the gain layer. The non-uniform multiplication region is replaced by an equivalent rectangular gain layer, from which a first-order bias-compensation relation for constant gain is derived and validated. Using multi-temperature measurements of LGADs designed by IHEP and fabricated by IME, together with an independent HPK dataset, we show that the gain-voltage curve family can be reconstructed from a reference-temperature main curve, substantially reducing characterization effort. The same idea is then extended to timing by decomposing the total time resolution into jitter and intrinsic components and representing their temperature dependences as component-wise equivalent bias offsets. The resulting framework provides a function-level description of multi-temperature LGAD time-resolution curves and offers a practical tool for calibration, operation, and reduced-density characterization of LGAD-based ultrafast timing systems.2025-09-10T08:54:10ZWeiyi SunMengzhao LiMei ZhaoZhijun Lianghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24270v1How to understand $ρ$ Resonance from the Quark Model and $ππ$ $P$-wave phase shift2026-04-27T10:01:57ZAs the lightest isovector vector meson, the $ρ$ meson is an important object for investigating the structure of resonant states in strong interactions. Owing to its strong coupling to the $ππ$ channel and its large decay width, the conventional constituent quark model treatment, in which it is simply regarded as a pure $q\bar q$ bound state while the hadronic-channel coupling effects are neglected, is insufficient to fully characterize its physical properties. To this end, in the present work we establish a unified framework for studying the structure and resonant properties of the $ρ$ meson by combining the quark-gluon and hadronic degrees of freedom. At the quark-gluon level, we first determine the parameters of the chiral quark model by refitting a set of narrow mesons for which open OZI-allowed strong-decay channels are absent or strongly suppressed. With these parameters fixed, the bare mass of the $ρ$ meson is obtained and used as the input for the subsequent hadronic-level analysis. At the hadronic level, based on inverse scattering theory, we construct a model including the coupling between the bare state and the $ππ$ continuum, extract the $ρ_0-ππ$ interaction using the $P$-wave $ππ$ scattering phase-shift data, and further calculate the width of the $ρ$ meson as well as the bare-state component in the physical state. The present work also provides a generalizable analytical framework for further studies of other hadronic resonances with significant channel-coupling effects.2026-04-27T10:01:57Z13 pages, 3 figuresWen-Ze ZhaoRu-Hui NiJia-Jun Wuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24152v1Probing the electron Yukawa coupling via resonant Higgs boson production at FCC-ee via $e^+e^- \to H \to WW^*$ in lepton-plus-jets final states2026-04-27T08:07:42ZWe report a detailed simulation study of the search for $s$-channel Higgs boson production in $e^+e^-$ collisions at a center-of-mass (c.m.) energy of $\sqrt{s}=125\,\mathrm{GeV}$ at the CERN Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee), as a means to constrain the electron Yukawa coupling, $y_e$. The process of interest is $e^+e^-\to H\to WW^*\to \ell^\pmν+ jj$ with four different $WW^*$ final states considered, involving both on- and off-shell $W$ bosons decaying either into dileptons ($\ell^\pm = e^\pm$ and $μ^\pm$, including those from $τ^\pm$ decays) or into dijets ($jj$). Signal and background events are discriminated through a multiclass gradient boosted decision tree exploiting a comprehensive set of kinematic and topological variables across the four final-state categories. Assuming a monochromatized c.m. energy spread of 4.1 MeV, yielding a $σ_{e^+e^-\to H} = 280\,\mathrm{ab}$ resonant cross section, and an integrated luminosity of $10\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$, the analysis achieves a combined statistical significance of 2.0 standard deviations. This corresponds to an upper limit on the coupling modifier $κ_e = y_e/y_e^{\rm SM} \lesssim 1.35$ at 95\% confidence level, and provides the most stringent constraint on the electron Yukawa coupling achieved in simulation-based studies to date.2026-04-27T08:07:42Z36 pages, 9 tables, 13 figuresApranik FatehiReza Jafari SeyedabadAmir AmiriKazem AziziDavid d'EnterriaLouis PortalesMichele Selvaggihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23966v1Design of the DUNE horizontal drift far detector charge readout electronics and performance in ProtoDUNE-HD2026-04-27T02:26:17ZDUNE (Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment) is a long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment currently under construction, whose far detectors will be the largest liquid argon time projection chambers ever built. This detector design calls for custom-built cryogenic front-end electronics to attain the required detector performance. This paper describes the charge readout electronics that will be used in the DUNE horizontal drift (HD) far detector and presents performance results using data from the ProtoDUNE-HD detector, a 770 ton liquid argon time projection chamber operated at the CERN Neutrino Platform in 2024 that served as the final prototype of the DUNE HD design.2026-04-27T02:26:17Z DUNE CollaborationS. AbbasluF. Abd AlrahmanA. Abed AbudR. AcciarriL. P. AccorsiM. A. AceroM. R. AdamesG. AdamovM. AdamowskiK. AdhikariC. AdrianoK. Agudelo-JaramilloF. AkbarF. AlemannoN. S. AlexL. Aliaga SoplinA. AlqaisiM. AlrashedA. AltonR. AlvarezT. AlvesA. AmanH. AmarR. AmarineiP. AmedoE. P. M. AmorimJ. AndersonD. A. AndradeC. AndreopoulosM. AndreottiM. P. AndrewsF. AndrianalaS. AndringaF. AnjarazafyS. AnsarifardD. AnticA. AntonakisA. Aranda-FernandezT. Araya-SantanderL. ArellanoE. Arrieta DiazM. A. ArroyaveM. Artero PonsJ. AsaadiM. AscencioA. AshkenaziL. AsquithE. AtkinD. AugusteA. AurisanoV. AushevD. AutieroD. Ávila GómezM. B. AzamF. AzfarJ. J. BackY. BaeI. BagaturiaL. BagbyH. BagduS. BalasubramanianA. BalboniP. BaldiW. BaldiniE. BaldoJ. BaldonedoB. BallerB. BambahF. BaraoD. BarbuG. BarenboimP. Barham AlzásG. J. BarkerW. BarkhouseE. Barlas YucelG. BarrW. BarrettD. BarrowJ. L. BarrowA. Basharina-FreshvilleA. BashyalV. BasqueM. BassaniD. BasuL. Bathe-PetersJ. G. Batista SigoloJ. B. R. BattatF. BattistiJ. BautistaF. BayJ. L. L. Bazo AlbaJ. F. BeacomE. BechetoilleA. BeeverB. BeheraE. BelchiorB. BellG. BellL. BellantoniG. BellettiniV. BelliniO. BeltramelloC. Benitez MontielD. BenjaminK. BenslamaF. Bento NevesJ. BergerS. BerkmanJ. BermudezJ. BernalP. BernardiniA. BersaniE. BertholetE. BertoliniS. BertolucciM. BetancourtA. Betancur RodríguezY. BezawadaA. T. BezerraA. BhatV. BhatnagarM. BhattacharjeeS. BhattacharjeeM. BhattacharyaS. BhullerB. BhuyanS. BiagiJ. BianK. BieryB. BilkiA. BinauM. BishaiP. BishopA. BlakeA. BlanchetF. D. BlaszczykG. C. BlazeyE. BlucherA. BodekB. BogartJ. BoissevainS. BolognesiT. BoltonL. BombenM. BonesiniC. Bonilla-DiazA. BoothF. BoranC. BordenR. Borges MerloD. BorodulinaN. BostanG. BotogoskeB. BottinoR. BouetJ. BozaB. BrahmaD. BrailsfordF. BramatiA. BrancaA. BrandtJ. BremerS. J. BriceS. BricknerV. BrioC. BrizzolariC. BrombergJ. BrookeA. BrossG. BrunettiM. B. BrunettiN. BuchananH. BuddJ. BuergiA. BundockD. BurgardtS. ButchartG. Caceres V.R. CalabreseR. CalabreseJ. CalcuttL. CaliversS. CalvezE. CalvoA. CaminataA. F. CaminoW. CampanelliA. CampaniA. Campos BenitezN. CanciJ. CapóI. CaracasD. CaratelliD. CarberG. CariniM. F. CarneiroP. CarnitiI. Caro TerrazasH. CarranzaN. CarraraL. CarrollA. CarterJ. Carvalho RobertoE. CasarejosD. CasazzaJ. F. Castaño ForeroF. A. CastañoC. CastromonteE. Catano-MurC. CattadoriF. CavalierF. CavannaS. CentroG. CeratiC. CernaA. CervelliA. Cervera VillanuevaJ. ChakraniM. ChalifourA. ChappellA. ChatterjeeB. ChauhanC. Chavez BarajasH. ChenM. ChenW. C. ChenY. ChenZ. ChenD. CherdackS. S. ChhibraC. ChiF. ChiapponiR. ChircoN. ChitirasreemadamK. ChoS. ChoateG. ChoiD. ChokheliP. S. ChongO. ChowB. ChowdhuryD. ChristianE. ChurchM. F. CicalaM. CicerchiaV. CiceroR. CioliniP. ClarkeG. ClineA. G. CoccoJ. A. B. CoelhoA. CohenJ. CollazoJ. CollotH. CombsJ. M. ConradL. ContiT. ContrerasM. ConveryK. ConwayS. CopelloP. CovaC. CoxL. CremonesiJ. I. Crespo-AnadónM. CrislerE. CristaldoJ. CrnkovicG. CroneR. CrossT. CruzA. CuddC. CuestaY. CuiF. CurciarelloD. CussansO. DalagerW. DallawayR. D'AmicoH. da MottaZ. A. DarR. DarbyL. Da Silva PeresQ. DavidG. S. DaviesS. DaviniJ. DawsonR. De AguiarK. H. De BarrosP. DebbinsM. P. DecowskiA. de GouvêaP. C. De HolandaP. De JongP. Del Amo SanchezG. De LauretisA. DelbartM. DelgadoA. Dell'AcquaG. Delle MonacheN. DelmonteP. De LurgioG. De MatteisJ. R. T. de Mello NetoA. P. A. De MendoncaD. M. DeMuthS. DennisC. DenshamP. DentonG. W. DeptuchV. De RomeriJ. P. DetjeJ. DevineK. DhanmeherR. DharmapalanM. DiasA. DiazJ. S. DíazF. DíazF. Di CapuaA. Di DomenicoS. Di DomizioS. Di FalcoD. Di FerdinandoL. Di GiulioP. DingL. Di NotoE. DiociaiutiG. Di SciascioC. DistefanoR. Di StefanoR. DiurbaM. DiwanZ. DjurcicS. DolanM. DolceM. J. DolinskiD. DomeniciS. DominguezS. DonatiS. DoranD. DouglasT. A. DoyleF. DrielsmaD. J. DrobnerD. DuchesneauK. DuffyK. DugasP. DunneS. DurandoB. DuttaD. A. DwyerA. S. DyshkantS. DytmanM. EadsA. EarleS. EdayathD. EdmundsJ. EischS. EliasJ. EllisW. EmarkP. EnglezosA. EreditatoD. T. ErgonulT. ErjavecC. O. EscobarJ. J. EvansE. EwartA. C. EzeribeK. FaheyA. FalconeC. FangM. Fani'F. FanomezanaD. FaragherC. FarneseY. FarzanJ. FelixY. FengM. Ferreira da SilvaE. FialovaL. FieldsP. FilipA. FilkinsF. FilthautG. FiorilloM. FioriniN. F. Fiuza De BarrosS. FogartyW. ForemanB. FossingJ. FowlerJ. FrancK. FrancisD. FrancoJ. FranklinJ. FreemanJ. FriedA. FriedlandS. FuessI. K. FuricK. FurmanA. P. FurmanskiR. GabaA. GabrielliA. M GagoF. GalizziH. GallagherM. GalliN. GalliceV. GalymovE. GamberiniT. GambleR. GanR. GandhiS. GangulyF. GaoS. GaoA. GarciaD. Garcia-GamezM. Á. García-PerisV. Garcia PolS. GardinerP. GauzziG. GeN. GeffroyB. GelliS. GentA. GhoshT. GiammariaD. GibinI. Gil-BotellaA. GioiosaS. GiovannellaA. K. GiriV. GiustiD. GnaniO. GogotaS. GollapinniK. GollwitzerR. A. GomesL. S. Gomez FajardoD. Gonzalez-DiazJ. Gonzalez-SantomeM. C. GoodmanS. GoswamiC. GottiJ. GoudeauC. GraceE. GramelliniR. GranP. GrangerC. GrantD. R. GratieriG. GrausoP. GreenS. GreenbergW. C. GriffithA. GruberK. GrzelakL. GuW. GuV. GuarinoM. GuariseR. GuenetteM. GuerzoniD. GuffantiA. GuglielmiF. Y. GuoA. GuptaV. GuptaG. GurungD. GutierrezP. GuzowskiM. M. GuzzoS. GwonA. HabigR. HafejiL. HagamanA. HahnJ. HakenmüllerA. HambardzumyanT. HamernikP. HamiltonJ. HancockM. HandleyF. HappacherB. HarrisD. A. HarrisL. HarrisA. L. HartJ. HartnellT. HartnettT. HasegawaC. M. HasnipK. HassininR. HatcherS. HawkinsJ. HaysM. HeA. HeaveyK. M. HeegerA. HeindelJ. HeiseK. HellerP. HellmuthL. HendersonA. HergenhanJ. HernándezM. A. Hernandez MorquechoK. HernerV. HewesA. HigueraA. HimmelE. HinkleL. R. HirschJ. HoJ. Hoefken ZinkJ. HoffA. HolinC. HongS. HoriuchiG. A. Horton-SmithR. HosokawaT. HoudyB. HowardI. HristovaM. S. HronekY. HuaJ. HuangR. G. HuangX. HuangZ. HulcherA. HussainG. IlesN. IlicA. M. IliescuR. IllingworthF. ImamogluG. IngrattaA. IoannisianM. Ismerio OliveiraC. M. JacksonA. JacobiV. JainC. JamesE. JamesW. JangB. JargowskyD. JenaI. JentzC. JiangJ. JiangA. JipaJ. H. JoF. R. JoaquimA. M. JohnsonW. JohnsonC. JolletM. JoshiN. JovancevicM. JudahC. K. JungK. Y. JungT. JunkY. JwaM. KabirnezhadA. C. KabothI. KadenkoO. KalikulovD. KalraM. KandemirS. KarC. KaragianniG. KaragiorgiG. KaramanA. KarcherY. KaryotakisS. P. KasettiL. KashurA. KautherN. KazaryanL. KeE. KearnsP. T. KeenerA. KellyK. J. KellyR. KelothO. KemulariaJ. KerbyY. KermaidicW. KetchumS. H. KettellN. KhanA. KhvedelidzeD. KimJ. KimM. J. KimS. KimB. KingM. KingM. KirbyA. KishJ. KleinJ. KleykampT. KobilarcikL. KochK. KoehlerL. W. KoernerD. H. KohK. KongM. KordoskyV. A. KosteleckýI. KotlerM. KramerF. KrennrichT. KroupovaS. KubotaM. KubuV. A. KudryavtsevG. KufattyA. KumarJ. KumarM. KumarP. KumarS. KumaranJ. KunzmannV. KusT. KutterJ. KvasnickaT. LabreeM. LachatT. LackeyI. LalăuA. LambertB. J. LandC. E. LaneN. LaneK. LangM. LangstaffF. LanniS. LanziJ. LarkinP. LasorakD. LastG. LaurentiE. LavautW. LavrijsenH. LayI. LazanuR. LaZurM. LazzaroniS. LeardiniJ. LearnedG. Lehmann MiottoR. LehnertM. LeitnerH. LemoineD. Leon SilverioL. M. LepinJ. D. LewisJ. -Y LiS. W. LiY. LiR. C. R. LimaR. LimaC. S. LinD. LindebaumS. LindenA. ListerB. R. LittlejohnJ. LiuY. LiuM. LkhagvadorjS. LockwitzI. LomidzeJ. LopezI. López de RegoN. López-MarchA. Lopez MorenoJ. M. LoSeccoA. Lozano SanchezX. -G. LuK. B. LukX. LuoG. LupiE. LuppiA. A. MachadoP. MachadoC. T. MaciasJ. R. MacierA. MadorskyS. MagillC. MagueurK. MahnA. MaioN. MajeedK. MajumdarA. MaligeS. MameliM. ManR. C. MandujanoJ. ManeiraS. ManlyK. ManolopoulosM. Manrique PlataS. Manthey CorchadoL. Manzanillas-VelezE. MaoM. MarchanA. MarchionniD. MarfatiaC. MarianiJ. MaricicR. MarieF. MarinhoA. D. MarinoT. MarkiewiczF. Das Chagas MarquesM. MarshakC. M. MarshallJ. MarshallJ. MartinM. MartinL. MartinaJ. Martín-AlboD. A. Martinez CaicedoM. Martinez-CasalesF. Martínez LópezS. MartynenkoV. MascagnaA. MastbaumM. MasudF. MatichardG. MatteucciJ. MatthewsC. MaugerN. MauriK. MavrokoridisI. MawbyT. McAskillN. McConkeyB. McConnellK. S. McFarlandC. McGivernC. McGrewA. McNabC. McNultyJ. MeadL. MeazzaV. C. N. MeddageA. MedhiM. MehmoodB. MehtaP. MehtaF. MeiP. MelasL. MelletT. C. D. MeloO. MenaD. P. MéndezA. MenegolliG. MengA. MengarelliA. C. E. A. MercuriA. MeregagliaG. MerinoM. D. MessierS. MetalloW. MetcalfM. MewesH. MeyerT. MiaoJ. MicallefA. MiccoliG. MichnaR. MilincicF. MillerG. MillerW. MillerA. MinottiL. Miralles VergeC. MironovS. MiscettiP. MishraS. R. MishraD. MladenovI. MocioiuA. MoganP. S. MohanR. MohantaT. A. MohayaiN. MokhovJ. MolinaL. Molina BuenoE. MontagnaA. MontanariC. MontanariD. MontanariD. MontaninoL. M. Montaño ZetinaM. MooneyA. F. MoorM. MooreZ. MooreB. MoreiraD. MorenoG. Moreno-GranadosO. Moreno-PalaciosL. MorescalchiA. MoritaE. MotukC. A. MouraW. MuL. MualemJ. MuellerM. MuetherA. MuirY. MukhamejanovA. MukhamejanovaE. MuldoonM. MulhearnD. MunfordL. J. MunteanuH. MuramatsuJ. MurazM. MurphyT. MurphyA. MytilinakiJ. NachtmanY. NagaiS. NaguH. NamD. NaplesS. NaritaJ. NavaD. Navas-NicolásA. Navrer-AgassonN. NayakM. Nebot-GuinotA. NehmJ. K. NelsonO. NeogiJ. NesbitM. NessiD. NewboldM. NewcomerD. NewmarkL. NguyenR. NicholF. J. Nicolas-ArnaldosA. NielsenA. NikolicaJ. NikolovE. NinerX. NingK. NishimuraA. NormanA. NorrickF. NotoP. NovellaA. NowakJ. A. NowakM. OberlingJ. P. Ochoa-RicouxS. OhS. B. OhA. OlivierT. OlsonY. OnelY. OnishchukA. OrandayG. P. Orebi GannA. I. R. OrimogunjeM. OsbistonJ. E. Ossa SanchezL. O'SullivanL. Otiniano OrmacheaL. PaganiO. PalamaraS. PalestiniJ. M. PaleyM. PallaviciniC. PalomaresB. PanS. PanM. PanareoP. PandaV. PandeyW. Panduro VazquezE. PanticV. PaoloneA. PapadopoulouR. PapaleoD. PapouliasS. ParamesvaranJ. ParkJ. ParkY. ParkS. ParkeS. ParsaM. ParvuD. PasciutoS. PascoliL. PasqualiniG. PatelJ. L. PatonC. PatrickL. PatriziiR. B. PattersonT. PatzakA. PaudelL. PaulucciZ. PavlovicG. PawloskiD. PayneA. PeakeV. PecE. PedreschiS. J. M. PeetersL. Pelegrina-GutiérrezW. PellicoE. PennacchioA. PenzoO. L. G. PeresY. F. Perez GonzalezL. Pérez-MolinaC. PernasJ. PerryD. PersheyG. PessinaG. PetrilloC. PettaR. PettiM. PfaffV. PiaG. M. PiacentinoL. PickeringG. PiemontiL. PieriniF. PietropaoloM. Pimenta SampaioV. L. PimentelG. PinaroliS. PinchaJ. PinchaultK. PittsP. PlesniakK. PletcherK. PlowsC. PollackF. PolleriT. PollmannF. PompaX. PonsN. PoonthottathilF. PoppiJ. PorterL. G. Porto PaixãoM. PozzatoR. PradhanL. PraisT. PrakashM. PrestF. PsihasD. PugnereD. PulliaX. QianJ. Quelin-LechevrantonJ. L. RaafV. RadekaJ. RademackerF. RaffaelliA. RafiqueU. RahamanA. RaheS. RajagopalanM. RajaoalisoaI. RakhnoL. RakotondravohitraM. A. RalaikotoL. RalteL. RalteM. A. Ramirez DelgadoB. RamsonS. S. RandriamanampisoaA. RappoldiG. RaselliT. RathP. RatoffR. RautR. RayH. RazafinimeR. F. RazakamiandraE. M. ReaJ. S. RealB. RebelR. RechenmacherM. Reggiani-GuzzoJ. ReichenbacherS. D. ReitznerE. RennerS. RepettoS. ResciaF. ResnatiJ. V. Restrepo LaverdeC. ReynoldsS. RiboldiC. RiccioG. RiccobeneJ. S. RicolM. RiganA. RikaloA. Ritchie-YatesD. RiveraA. RivettiA. RobertE. RoblesA. RocheM. RodaD. Rodas RodríguezM. J. O. RodriguesJ. Rodriguez RondonS. Rosauro-AlcarazP. RosierD. RossM. RossellaM. Ross-LonerganN. RoyP. RoyC. RoyonC. RubbiaD. RudikA. RuggeriG. Ruiz FerreiraK. RushiyaB. RussellE. Sabater AndresS. SacerdotiN. SaduyevD. SagarS. SahaS. K. SahooN. SahuS. SakhiyevP. SalaN. SallinG. SalmoriaS. SamantaM. C. SanchezA. Sánchez-CastilloP. Sanchez-LucasD. A. SandersS. SanfilippoG. SantoniD. SantoroN. SaoulidouP. SapienzaI. SarcevicI. SarraC. SauerL. SauerG. SavageV. SavinovA. ScanuA. ScaramelliT. SchefkeH. SchellmanS. SchifanoP. SchlabachD. W. SchmitzA. W. SchneiderK. ScholbergA. SchroederA. SchukraftB. SchuldS. SchwartzA. SegadeH. SegalE. SegretoA. SelyuninD. SenadheeraC. R. SeniseJ. SensenigS. H. SeoD. SeppelaM. H. ShaevitzP. ShanahanP. SharmaR. KumarS. Sharma PoudelK. ShawT. ShawJ. ShenC. Shepherd-ThemistocleousJ. ShiW. ShiS. ShinS. ShivakotiA. ShmakovI. ShoemakerD. ShooltzR. ShrockM. SidenJ. SilberL. SimardJ. SinclairG. SinevJaydip SinghJ. SinghL. SinghP. SinghV. SinghS. Singh ChauhanR. SiposC. SironneauG. SirriK. SiyeonK. SkarpaasJ. SmedleyJ. SmithR. S. Smith-JonesJ. SmolikM. SmyM. SnapeE. L. SniderP. SnopokM. Soares NunesH. SobelM. SoderbergH. SogarwalC. J. Solano SalinasS. Söldner-RemboldN. SolomeyV. SolovovW. E. SondheimT. SoniusM. SorbaraM. SorelJ. Soto-OtonA. SousaK. SoustruznikD. Souza CorreiaF. SpinellaJ. SpitzN. J. C. SpoonerD. StalderM. StancariL. StancoJ. SteenisR. SteinH. M. SteinerA. F. Steklain LisbôaJ. StewartB. StillwellJ. StockT. StokesT. StraussL. StrigariA. StuartW. SuA. SurdoL. SuterA. SuttonY. SuvorovR. SvobodaS. K. SwainC. SweeneyB. SzczerbinskaA. M. SzelcA. SztucA. TaffaraN. TalukdarJ. TamaraH. A. TanakaS. TangN. TaniuchiA. M. Tapia CasanovaA. TapperS. TariqE. TatarR. TayloeA. M. TekluK. Tellez Giron FloresJ. Tena VidalP. TennessenM. TentiK. TeraoF. TerranovaS. TeruelG. TesteraA. TheaS. ThomasA. ThompsonC. ThorpeM. TimalsinaS. C. TimmE. TirasV. TishchenkoS. TiwariN. TodorovićL. TomassettiA. TonazzoL. TongD. TorbunovD. Torres MuñozM. TortiM. TortolaY. TorunN. TosiD. TotaniM. ToupsC. TouramanisV. TrabattoniD. TranJ. TrevorE. TrillerS. TrilovD. TrottaW. H. TrzaskaY. TsaiY. -T. TsaiZ. TsamalaidzeK. V. TsangN. TsveravaS. Z. TuS. TufanliC. TunnellS. TurnbergJ. TurnerM. TuziM. TzanovM. A. UchidaJ. Ureña GonzálezJ. UrheimT. UsherH. UtaegbulamS. UzunyanM. R. VaginsP. VahleG. A. ValdiviessoE. ValenciaR. ValentimZ. VallariE. VallazzaJ. W. F. ValleR. Van BergD. V. ForeroP. Van GemmerenA. VannozziM. Van Nuland-TroostF. VaraniniN. VaughanK. VaziriA. Vázquez-RamosJ. VegaJ. VencesS. VenturaA. VerdugoM. VerzocchiJ. VesicK. VetterM. VicenziH. Vieira de SouzaC. VignoliC. VilelaE. VillaS. ViolaB. VirenG. V. StenicoR. VizarretaA. P. Vizcaya HernandezS. VlachosG. VorobyevQ. VuongA. V. WaldronL. WalkerH. WallaceM. WallachJ. WalshT. WaltonL. WanB. WangJ. WangL. WangM. H. L. S. WangX. WangY. WangY. WangD. WarnerL. WarsameM. O. WasckoD. WatersA. WatsonK. WawrowskaA. WeberC. M. WeberM. WeberH. WeiA. WeinsteinS. WesterdaleM. WetsteinQ. WeyrichK. WhalenA. J. WhiteL. H. WhiteheadD. WhittingtonF. WielerJ. WilhelmiM. J. WilkingA. WilkinsonC. WilkinsonR. J. WilsonP. WinterJ. WolcottJ. WolfsT. WongjiradA. WoodK. WoodE. WorcesterM. WorcesterK. WresiloM. WrightM. WrobelS. WuZ. WuJ. WyenbergB. M. WynneY. XiaoZ. XieD. XingB. YaeggyA. YahayaN. YahlaliE. YandelG. YangJ. YangT. YangA. YankelevichL. YatesU. YevarouskayaK. YoneharaT. YoungB. YuH. YuJ. YuK. YuW. YuanR. ZakiJ. ZalesakL. ZambelliB. ZamoranoA. ZaniL. ZazuetaG. P. ZellerJ. ZennamoJ. ZettlemoyerK. ZeugC. ZhangS. ZhangY. ZhangL. ZhaoM. ZhaoK. ZhuE. D. ZimmermanS. ZucchelliA. ZummoV. ZutshiR. Zwaskahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23956v1Systematic Investigation of Acceptor Removal in HPK LGADs with Modified Gain Layers2026-04-27T02:00:42ZLow-Gain Avalanche Diodes (LGADs) are fast silicon sensors with internal charge multiplication and are key candidates for precision timing layers in future high-energy hadron colliders. Their operation in harsh radiation environments, however, is limited by acceptor removal in the gain layer, which reduces the active acceptor concentration and degrades the internal electric field required for avalanche multiplication. Improving the radiation tolerance of the gain layer is therefore essential for future 4D tracking applications. In this work, we investigated several LGAD prototypes produced in collaboration with Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. (HPK), featuring modified gain-layer designs, including oxygen-modified, carbon-implanted, and boron--phosphorus compensated structures. The sensors were studied after proton and reactor-neutron irradiation. Radiation tolerance was characterized using the acceptor-removal coefficient extracted from IV measurements and the operation voltage required to recover the timing performance after irradiation. The results show that carbon implantation is the only approach among those studied here that provides a clear improvement in radiation tolerance. In contrast, neither oxygen-related modification, including the Partially Activated Boron (PAB) approach, nor gain-layer compensation alone yields a significant improvement, and the compensated carbon-implanted structure shows no clear advantage over the carbon-only case. In addition, the acceptor-removal coefficient is found to depend on the irradiation particle type and energy.2026-04-27T02:00:42ZTo be submitted to NIMAYua MurayamaMahiro KobayashiTomoka ImamuraKoji NakamuraIssei HorikoshiKoji SatoMasato TeradaMinoru HiroseTatsuya MasubuchiSayuka Kitahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23923v1Development and Performance Study of Vertical GaN $α$-Particle Detector with High Energy Resolution2026-04-27T00:47:07ZHigh-energy-resolution GaN $α$-particle detectors have significant potential for space radiation, nuclear instrumentation, and harsh-environment applications. However, existing GaN $α$-particle detectors still face several key challenges, including reducing the dead-layer thickness, suppressing leakage current under high reverse bias, improving energy resolution, and clarifying the physical mechanism underlying the low-energy tail phenomenon. This study presents a vertical homoepitaxial GaN $α$-particle detector integrating a 20-nm ultrathin dead layer and a guard-ring structure. The detector exhibits an ultralow leakage current of 2.195 nA at -200 V and an intrinsic energy resolution of 2.69% with a charge collection efficiency (CCE) of 95.9% at -260 V. More importantly, this work demonstrates for the first time through Geant4 simulations that depletion-width nonuniformity is the dominant source of partial energy leakage, leading to an extended low-energy tail in the energy spectrum. We establish a depletion-width nonuniformity model and observe good agreement between simulation and experiment. This finding provides practical guidance for the design and optimization of high-performance GaN-based radiation detectors.2026-04-27T00:47:07ZMinjie YeYuzi YangJiangtao WeiWeilong QinHao HongDong HanJianping NiZhiyi LiuPo-Chung HuangCheng-Chang YuChao-Yi FangEntsai LinZewen LiuShaomin Chen