https://arxiv.org/api/3kI06+RZWmwRhntsceO25Sut7Dw 2026-06-21T10:22:29Z 60462 825 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26817v1 2026-04-29T15:44:53Z

We identify a novel next-to-leading order renormalization effect in the dimension-six SMEFT with direct phenomenological impact. The Higgs-Yukawa operator that modifies the top-Higgs coupling $κ_t$ induces a shift in the $ W $ mass at two-loop order through a large anomalous dimension, rendering electroweak precision observables a powerful indirect probe of $κ_t$. We show that this effect is essential for the consistent interpretation of data from future Tera-$Z$ and Giga-$W$ factories such as FCC-ee. The effect is realized in a simple renormalizable two-Higgs doublet model.

2026-04-29T15:44:53Z 12 pages, 4 figures, 1 table Lukas Born Admir Greljo Anders Eller Thomsen http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19879v2 2026-04-29T15:27:50Z

In this Letter we explore the modelling of hadron production in electromagnetic ion dissociation (EMD) processes in high-energy ultraperipheral collisions at LHC energies. Since EMD can accompany exclusive particle production in these interactions, we demonstrate that the resulting hadrons can break the exclusivity vetos typically imposed by experiments. As two representative examples, we calculate the impact on existing LHC measurements of exclusive muon pair production ($γγ\toμμ$) and exclusive coherent $J/ψ$ production. We demonstrate that accounting for this effect resolves long-standing tensions between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements.

2026-04-21T18:01:58Z 9 pages, 8 figures, version submitted to journal M. Dyndal L. A. Harland-Lang http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26780v1 2026-04-29T15:11:50Z

Multi-messenger astronomy requires real-time systems capable of rapidly responding to external alerts and sharing significant detections with partner observatories. KM3NeT, a deep-sea Cherenkov neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea, is actively contributing to these efforts through a dedicated real-time analysis framework. It comprises two detectors - ARCA, optimised for TeV-PeV neutrinos, and ORCA, for GeV-TeV neutrinos - both also sensitive to MeV neutrinos from core-collapse supernovae, providing a wide field of view and an almost continuous duty cycle. The framework performs low-latency event reconstruction and classification, follows up external alerts from the multi-messenger community, monitors for core-collapse supernova neutrino bursts, and autonomously identifies and distribute cosmic neutrino alerts. Now in advanced commissioning, the KM3NeT real-time alert system represents a major step toward rapid, coordinated multi-messenger observations.

2026-04-29T15:11:50Z Contribution to the 2026 Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe session of the 60th Rencontres de Moriond Martina Marconi on behalf of the KM3NeT Collaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27028v1 2026-04-29T14:56:07Z

Based on a sample of $(10087 \pm 44) \times 10^6$ $J/ψ$ events collected with the BESIII detector at BEPCII, we report the first observation of the decay $J/ψ\rightarrow K^- Σ^0 \barΞ^++c.c.$. A partial wave analysis is performed to investigate the involved excited states. In addition to the well-established $Ξ(1690)$, a new doubly-strange hyperon $Ξ(1720) $ is observed decaying to $K^- Σ^0$ with a mass of $1721.0 \pm 5.2_{\rm stat.} \pm 3.4_{\rm syst.} ~{\rm MeV}/c^2$ and a width of $31.3 \pm 18.3_{\rm stat.} \pm 15.4_{\rm syst.} ~{\rm MeV}$, with a statistical significance exceeding $10σ$. The spin-parity hypothesis testing across various quantum number configurations reveals that the spin-parity of $Ξ(1720)$ favors $J^P = {\frac{3}{2}}^+$. Furthermore, the branching fraction of $J/ψ\rightarrow K^- Σ^0 \barΞ^++c.c.$ is determined to be $(2.68 \pm 0.04_{\rm stat.} \pm 0.17_{\rm syst.}) \times 10^{-5}$.

2026-04-29T14:56:07Z 10 pages, 3 figures BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai C. S. Akondi R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. H. An Y. Bai O. Bakina H. -R. Bao X. L. Bao M. Barbagiovanni V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann D. Cabiati H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen W. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori E. Di Fiore X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding Yi. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Shaoxu Du X. L. Du Y. Q. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang Jin Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng L. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Yunong Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. Gollub J. B. Gong J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo H. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez J. Y. Han T. T. Han X. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Y. X. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji L. K. Jia X. Q. Jia D. Jiang H. B. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao L. C. L. Jin S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana X. L. Kang X. S. Kang B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger L. Krümmel Y. Y. Kuang M. Kuessner X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li Chunkai Li Cong Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li H. P. Li Hui Li J. N. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li M. T. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. L. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat C. C. Lin C. X. Lin D. X. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu Kun Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu T. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. P. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Yi Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. L. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. X. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma Y. M. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Maity S. Malde Q. A. Malik H. X. Mao Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti X. Pan Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus G. L. Peng H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad L. Pöpping F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi M. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas M. Schernau K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi Ch. Y. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi M. H. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S. Stansilaus F. Stieler M. Stolte S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun H. Tabaharizato C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang Z. H. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian I. Uman E. van der Smagt B. Wang Bin Wang Bo Wang C. Wang Chao Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang H. J. Wang H. R. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang Mi Wang N. Y. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang T. J. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Yanning Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Zhi Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei D. J. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner H. R. Wen S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. W. Wu Z. Wu H. L. Xia L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing D. B. Xiong C. J. Xu G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan Y. Y. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang X. Y. Yang Y. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. M. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Youhua Yang Z. Y. Yang Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Yongchao Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan Jie Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang Gengyuan Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang Han Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang Jin Zhang Jiyuan Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang Q. Z. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang S. N. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Yu Zhang Z. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang Zhilong Zhang Ziyang Zhang Ziyu Zhang G. Zhao J. -P. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao Lei Zhao M. G. Zhao R. P. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. P. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng W. Q. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. X. Zhu Lin Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang M. Zhuge J. H. Zou J. Zu http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13081v2 2026-04-29T14:39:37Z

Precision measurements of Higgs boson differential production cross sections are a key tool to probe the properties of the Higgs boson and test the standard model. New physics can affect both Higgs boson production and decay, leading to deviations from the distributions that are expected in the standard model. In this paper, combined measurements of differential spectra in a fiducial region matching the experimental selections are performed, based on analyses of four Higgs boson decay channels ($γγ$, ZZ$^{(*)}$, WW$^{(*)}$, and $ττ$) using proton-proton collision data recorded with the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The differential measurements are extrapolated to the full phase space and combined to provide the differential spectra. A measurement of the total Higgs boson production cross section is also performed using the $γγ$ and ZZ decay channels, with a result of 53.4 $^{+2.9}_{-2.9}$ (stat) $^{+1.9}_{-1.8}$ (syst) pb, consistent with the standard model prediction of 55.6 $\pm$ 2.5 pb. The fiducial measurements are used to compute limits on Higgs boson couplings using the $κ$-framework and the SM effective field theory.

2025-04-17T16:48:08Z Replaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-23-013 (CMS Public Pages) JHEP 04 (2026) 093 CMS Collaboration 10.1007/JHEP04(2026)093 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04095v1 2026-04-29T14:23:09Z

After the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) upgrade into High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), the instantaneous luminosity is expected to reach values up to 7.5x10^34cm^2/s, causing a harsher radiation environment as well as a significant increase in data rate. The current CMS Tracker detector would not be able to operate under these conditions and it will be replaced by an upgraded version known as Phase-2. In view of the detector upgrade and as part of the design validation process, a Quality Control (QC) test flow has been developed to characterize the first pixel modules prototypes and evaluate their performance. The results of this procedure were the starting point for small design adjustments, especially for the the High Density Interconnect or HDI, the flexible low mass PCB that distributes power and signals to the module and controls the readout through a high speed data transmission channel. This talk includes qualification tests performed on the CMS Phase-2 design to ensure that all the pixel module components satisfy the upgrade specifications, for example in terms of power consumption and leakage current stability. Additionally, stress tests were conducted to probe the limits of the design, demonstrating the robustness and endurance of the module layout. Due to the differing material properties of the HDI copper layers and the silicon sensor and readout chip, temperature gradients induce different thermal expansion and contraction, resulting in mechanical stress on the bump-bond interface. For this reason, among the destructive measurements, dedicated thermal stress tests were carried out to evaluate the bump-bond strength and durability for different bump bonding techniques.

2026-04-29T14:23:09Z Giorgia Bonomelli on behalf of the CMS Tracker Group 10.1109/NSS/MIC/RTSD57106.2025.11286599 http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20932v3 2026-04-29T14:21:41Z

We investigate the time modulation of weak nuclear decays as a method to probe axion dark matter. To this end, we develop a theoretical framework to compute the $θ$-dependence of weak nuclear decays, including electron capture and $β$ decay, which enables us to predict the time variation of weak radioactivity in response to an oscillating axion dark matter background. As an application, we recast old data sets, from the weak nuclear decays of ${^{40}\text{K}}$ and ${^{137}\text{Cs}}$ taken at the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory, in order to set constraints on the axion decay constant, specifically in the axion mass range from few $10^{-23}\;$eV up to $10^{-19}\;$eV. We finally propose a new measurement at the Gran Sasso Laboratory, based on the weak nuclear decay of ${^{40}\text{K}}$ via electron capture, in order to explore even shorter timescales, thus reaching sensitivities to axion masses up to $10^{-9}\;$eV.

2024-12-30T13:22:39Z 23 pages, 3 figures, version published in Phys. Rev. D. Typo in Eq. (4.5) corrected; results unchanged Phys. Rev. D 111, 035022 (2025) Jorge Alda Carlo Broggini Giuseppe Di Carlo Luca Di Luzio Denise Piatti Stefano Rigolin Claudio Toni 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.035022 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23081v2 2026-04-29T13:39:05Z

Using $(10\,087 \pm 44) \times 10^6$ $J/ψ$ events collected with the BESIII detector, we perform the first amplitude analysis of the process $J/ψ\toγηπ^0$. The decay is dominated by the intermediate processes $J/ψ\toπ^0 b_1(1235)^0 \toγηπ^0$, $J/ψ\toπ^{0}ρ(1450)^0 \toγηπ^0$ and $J/ψ\toηh_1(1170) \toγηπ^0$. Contributions from $J/ψ\toγa_0(980)^0\toγηπ^0$, $J/ψ\toγa_2(1320)^0\toγηπ^0$ and $J/ψ\toγa_2(1700)^0\toγηπ^0$ are observed with a statistical significance exceeding $5σ$, constituting the first observation of radiative transitions of $J/ψ$ to isospin-triplet scalar mesons. The total branching fraction of $J/ψ\toγηπ^0$ is measured to be $(25.7\pm0.3\pm1.5)\times 10^{-6}$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. This result is consistent with the previous measurement, with the precision improved by more than a factor of two.

2026-03-24T11:23:21Z 12 pages, 2 figures BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai C. S. Akondi R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. H. An Y. Bai O. Bakina H. -R. Bao X. L. Bao M. Barbagiovanni V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann D. Cabiati H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen W. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori E. Di Fiore X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding Yi. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Shaoxu Du X. L. Du Y. Q. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang Jin Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng L. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Yunong Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. Gollub J. B. Gong J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo H. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez J. Y. Han T. T. Han X. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Y. X. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji L. K. Jia X. Q. Jia Z. K. Jia D. Jiang H. B. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao L. C. L. Jin S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana X. L. Kang X. S. Kang B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger L. Krümmel Y. Y. Kuang M. Kuessner X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li Chunkai Li Cong Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li H. P. Li Hui Li J. N. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li M. T. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. L. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat C. C. Lin C. X. Lin D. X. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu Kun Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu T. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. P. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Yi Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. L. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. X. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma Y. M. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Maity S. Malde Q. A. Malik H. X. Mao Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti X. Pan Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus G. L. Peng H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad L. Pöpping F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi M. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas M. Schernau K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi Ch. Y. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi M. H. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S. Stansilaus F. Stieler M. Stolte S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun H. Tabaharizato C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang Z. H. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian I. Uman E. van der Smagt B. Wang Bin Wang Bo Wang C. Wang Chao Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang H. J. Wang H. R. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang Mi Wang N. Y. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang T. J. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Yanning Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Zhi Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei D. J. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner H. R. Wen S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. W. Wu Z. Wu H. L. Xia L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing D. B. Xiong C. J. Xu G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan Y. Y. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang X. Y. Yang Y. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. M. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Youhua Yang Z. Y. Yang Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Yongchao Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan Jie Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang Gengyuan Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang Han Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang Jin Zhang Jiyuan Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang Q. Z. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang S. N. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Yu Zhang Z. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang Zhilong Zhang Ziyang Zhang Ziyu Zhang G. Zhao J. -P. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao Lei Zhao M. G. Zhao R. P. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. P. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng W. Q. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. X. Zhu Lin Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang M. Zhuge J. H. Zou J. Zu 10.1103/8wdg-kwqj http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.23091v2 2026-04-29T13:34:10Z

The top-quark mass is measured using top-quark decays producing an isolated lepton and $J/ψ$ meson reconstructed in its $μ^+μ^-$ decay mode. The data sample was recorded with the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$. The measurement is based on the invariant mass $m(\ell μ^+μ^-)$ of the system made of the isolated lepton $\ell$ from the $W$ boson decay and the non-isolated $μ^+μ^-$ pair from a $J/ψ$ decay of a $b$-hadron, exploiting its sensitivity to the top-quark mass. An unbinned maximum-likelihood fit to the $m(\ell μ^+μ^-)$ distribution is performed to extract the top-quark mass. The top-quark mass is measured to be $m_{top} = 172.17 \pm 0.80 (stat) \pm 0.81 (syst) \pm 1.07 (recoil)$ GeV, with a total uncertainty of 1.56 GeV. The third uncertainty arises from changing the dipole parton shower gluon-recoil scheme used in top-quark decays.

2025-11-28T11:23:03Z 50 pages in total, author list starting page 33, 19 figures, 8 tables, published on JHEP. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at <http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/TOPQ-2018-19>. HEP-Data record at <https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins3087833> JHEP 04 (2026) 099 ATLAS Collaboration 10.1007/JHEP04(2026)099 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26581v1 2026-04-29T12:01:29Z

Identifying compact binary coalescences buried within the non-Gaussian and non-stationary data taken by gravitational-wave interferometers requires sophisticated search pipelines, such as the PyCBC analysis. A critical task for these pipelines is determining the statistical significance of candidate events by comparing a "ranking statistic" against a large background set. Currently, PyCBC's ranking statistic incorporates the joint probability of the relative arrival times, phase delays and amplitude ratios of the signals seen in different detectors. These parameters are tightly constrained for physical signals but are more broadly distributed for noise. PyCBC currently relies on precomputed binned histogram-based density estimators using Monte-Carlo simulations to obtain these probabilities. However, the storage requirements for these histograms scale prohibitively with the size of the detector network, preventing PyCBC from effectively analyzing four or more detectors. In this paper, we demonstrate that these histograms can be replaced with normalizing flows, a machine learning approach to density estimation. Applying this method to data from the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Virgo, we demonstrate that normalizing flows reduce storage requirements by over three orders of magnitude. Furthermore, our approach maintains high sensitivity, with less than a 0.05% drop in the recovery of simulated signals at a fixed false-alarm rate. By relaxing several simplifying assumptions previously required by Monte-Carlo methods, we also achieved up to a 6.55% increase in recovered signals for specific detector combinations. These results suggest that normalizing flows provide a scalable, flexible framework for the PyCBC pipeline as it expands to include four or more detectors, or to extend to searches for precessing or higher-mode signals, in future observing runs.

2026-04-29T12:01:29Z 15 pages, 10 figures Sam Insley Michael J. Williams Rahul Dhurkunde Ian Harry http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23030v2 2026-04-29T09:10:01Z

Hadronic molecules $\mathfrak{M}=J/ψB_{c}^{+}$ and $\widetilde{\mathfrak{ \ M}}=η_{c}B_{c}^{\ast +}$ are investigated in the framework of QCD sum rule method. These particles with spin-parities $J^{\mathrm{P}}=1^+$ have the quark contents $cc \overline{c}\overline{b}$. We compute their masses and current couplings and find that they are numerically very close to each other coinciding within accuracy of the sum rule method. Therefore, we concentrate on the molecule $J/ψB_{c}^{+}$ and explore features of this state in a detailed form. Our prediction $m=(9740 \pm 70)~\mathrm{MeV}$ for its mass means that $\mathfrak{M}$ easily decays to pairs of ordinary mesons through strong interactions. There are two mechanisms responsible for transformations of $\mathfrak{M}$ to conventional mesons. The fall-apart mechanism generates the dominant decay channels $\mathfrak{M} \to J/ψB_{c}^{+}$ and $\mathfrak{M} \to η_{c}B_{c}^{\ast +}$. Annihilation of $ \overline{c}c$ quarks triggers subdominant processes with various final-state $B$ and $D$ mesons: Six of such channels are considered in this work. The partial widths all of decays are computed using the three-point sum rule approach. The width $Γ[ \mathfrak{M}]=(121 \pm 17)~ \mathrm{MeV }$ of the hadronic axial-vector molecule $\mathfrak{M}$, as well as its mass provide valuable information for running and future experiments.

2025-12-28T18:14:43Z 15 Pages and 6 Figures S. S. Agaev K. Azizi H. Sundu http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15585v2 2026-04-29T08:51:36Z

Discrimination of fast neutrons, thermal neutrons, and $γ$ rays in mixed radiation fields is important for radiation monitoring, reactor-related measurements, and background suppression in nuclear experiments. In this work, we investigate a compact plastic-scintillator sensor composed of EJ276 or EJ200 optically coupled to an EJ426 thermal neutron screen and read out by a single photomultiplier tube (PMT). The $γ$ equivalent energy response of the detector assemblies was calibrated using $^{137}$Cs, $^{22}$Na, and $^{60}$Co sources through Compton edge analysis, and pulse shape discrimination was evaluated with an AmBe neutron source under different moderator thicknesses. The EJ200+EJ426 assembly provides a well separated discrimination between thermal-neutron capture events and $γ$ dominated events over the measured range, with a figure of merit greater than 5. In contrast, the EJ276+EJ426 assembly produced three identifiable signal populations associated with $γ$ rays, fast neutrons, and thermal neutrons. These results show that the proposed sensor architecture is a promising compact approach for mixed field radiation applications

2025-12-17T16:45:13Z Sensors 26 (2026) 3462 Yuhang Liu Fengpeng An Guang Luo Wei Wang Xuesong Zhang Dixiao Lu Xiaohao Yin 10.3390/s26113462 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23913v2 2026-04-29T08:29:02Z

We report on an experimental demonstration of efficient neutron generation based on direct laser acceleration in microwire-array targets irradiated by ultrashort (tens of femtoseconds) laser pulses. The optimal array period was identified, at which the maximum proton energy and the number of protons with energies exceeding $1~\mathrm{MeV}$ were significantly increased. Using a $1~\mathrm{PW}$, $\sim25~\mathrm{fs}$ laser at a moderate intensity of $\sim10^{20}~\mathrm{W/cm^2}$, a high neutron yield of up to $(8.33\pm0.84)\times10^{6}~\mathrm{n/sr/J}$ was detected from the LiD converter via $^7\mathrm{Li}(p,n)$ and $\mathrm{D}(p,n+p)$ nuclear reactions. Self-consistent integrated simulations reproduced the experimental results and predicted that with a Be converter, a forward pulsed neutron source with an unprecedented yield per joule of $3.67\times10^{7}~\mathrm{n/sr/J}$ can be obtained under identical laser conditions. This type of neutron source is favorable for applications that require a high repetition rate utilizing compact and economical laser systems.

2026-04-26T23:58:37Z Kaiyuan Feng Debin Zou Bo Cui Shukai He Yingzi Dai Wei Qi Jinlong Luo Jie Feng Xinyan Li Zehao Chen Lixiang Hu Chengyu Qin Guobo Zhang Hui Zhang Zhigang Deng Xiaohu Yang Fuqiu Shao Liangliang Ji Weiming Zhou Tongpu Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26406v1 2026-04-29T08:21:01Z

The semileptonic decays of $B_q$ mesons ($q=u,d,s$) to $J^P=2^+$ charmed mesons are investigated. The form factors parametrising the hadronic matrix elements of the weak vector and axial-vector quark currents are evaluated using light-cone QCD sum rules with external $B_q$ state, including the 3-particle contributions. The form factors of pseudoscalar and tensor quark currents occurring in extensions of the Standard Model are also determined. The relations expected in the heavy quark limit are tested and the size of finite heavy quark mass corrections are determined for the various form factors. Results are presented for the semileptonic $B_q$ to heavy tensor meson decay rates in the Standard Model, and for the ratios testing Lepton Flavour Universality.

2026-04-29T08:21:01Z 41 pages, 9 figures Pietro Colangelo Fulvia De Fazio Carlo la Torre Giuseppe Roselli http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26386v1 2026-04-29T07:57:16Z

At the High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC), silicon pixel detectors will be exposed to radiation fluences about 5 to 10 times larger than those experienced by the current innermost pixel layers up to today. Signal loss will be the main limitation to tracking and vertexing performance due to radiation damage in hybrid pixel detectors, with the increase in leakage current and depletion voltage posing severe constraints on operating conditions. It is important to have reliable predictions for all observables - such as charge collection performance, leakage current level and breakdown voltage - after irradiation, in order to estimate operational voltage values and to test the robustness of tracking algorithms. In this paper, the predictions of Silvaco and Synopsys TCAD device simulations are compared when the surface and bulk defects and traps of the ``Perugia radiation damage model'' are included. The results are quite promising regarding leakage current, depletion voltage, electric field and trap statistics, at two distinct reference temperatures and fluences.

2026-04-29T07:57:16Z 8 pages, 7 figures, prepared for the proceedings of 21st Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation Detectors 17-19 February 2026 Perugia, Italy M. Bomben T. Croci K. Aouadj A. Fondacci F. Moscatelli A. Morozzi D. Passeri