https://arxiv.org/api/oFeVf5vDTmNCXVCely3jEGsCIuE 2026-06-15T04:34:39Z 60398 720 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04471v2 2026-04-29T18:13:06Z

We investigate the physics reach and potential for the study of $B$-meson decays to invisible final states at the Future Circular Collider running electron-positron collisions at the $Z$ pole (FCC-ee). Signal and background candidates are simulated for a proposed multipurpose detector, including inclusive contributions from $Z$ decays to leptons or quarks. Signal candidates are selected by a mixture of rectangular cuts and a multiclass boosted decision tree classifier. We determine that branching fractions above $7.6\times10^{-9}$ ($9.7\times10^{-9}$) would be excluded at 90% (95%) confidence level, and branching fractions above $3.0\times10^{-8}$ would be within discovery reach at FCC-ee if $6\times 10^{12}$ $Z$ bosons are produced.

2025-08-06T14:18:54Z JHEP 04 (2026) 011 P. Alvarez Cartelle M. Kenzie R. Mangrulkar A. R. Wiederhold E. Wood 10.1007/JHEP04(2026)011 10.17181/q9yx5-9cx10 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27044v1 2026-04-29T17:54:15Z

Measurements of Higgs boson pair (HH) production in the four bottom quark (4b) final state are presented using proton-proton (pp) collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 62 fb$^{-1}$. Events in which the Higgs boson decays, H$\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$, are separately reconstructed as pairs of small-radius jets (resolved), as well as those where they are reconstructed as single large-radius jets (merged), are studied exclusively. Benefiting from new methods in trigger selection, event selection, and signal extraction, the combination of analyses in the resolved and merged topologies gives an observed (expected) upper limit on the HH signal strength, $μ_\mathrm{HH}$, of 4.4 (4.4) at 95% confidence level (CL). Compared to previously published LHC results in the 4b final state, the expected limit with an equivalent integrated luminosity is improved by more than a factor of two in the resolved topology and is better in the merged topology as well. An updated analysis of the resolved topology using 138 fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV pp collision data yields an observed (expected) 95% CL upper limit on $μ_\mathrm{HH}$ of 10.0 (5.9), an improvement of about 25% in the expected limit compared to the published results using the same data. Results in the 4b final state with 13 and 13.6 TeV are combined, resulting in an observed (expected) 95% CL upper limit on $μ_\mathrm{HH}$ of 4.7 (2.8). The allowed ranges for the Higgs boson trilinear self-coupling and quartic coupling between two Higgs bosons and two vector bosons are also reported. These are the most stringent constraints achieved in the 4b final state to date.

2026-04-29T17:54:15Z Submitted to Physical Review D. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-24-010 (CMS Public Pages) CMS Collaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26879v1 2026-04-29T16:47:07Z

The Standard Model (SM) predicts the universality of lepton couplings with the electroweak gauge bosons. Semileptonic decays of $b$-hadrons provide a powerful framework for testing the SM and probing possible New Physics effects. In particular, the processes mediated by charged-current interactions benefit from a relatively large branching fractions and theoretically well-controlled hadronic matrix elements. This contribution presents three recent results from the LHCb experiment: the first measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $\mathcal{R}(D^{**})$ using $B^{-} \to D^{**0} τ^{-} \barν_τ$ decays, the determination of the branching fraction for $Λ\to p μ^{-} \barν_μ$ and the extraction of form-factor parameters from $B^0 \to D^{*-} μ^{+} ν_μ$ decays.

2026-04-29T16:47:07Z Contribution to the 2026 QCD session of the 60th Rencontres de Moriond Davide Fazzini http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26817v1 2026-04-29T15:44:53Z

We identify a novel next-to-leading order renormalization effect in the dimension-six SMEFT with direct phenomenological impact. The Higgs-Yukawa operator that modifies the top-Higgs coupling $κ_t$ induces a shift in the $ W $ mass at two-loop order through a large anomalous dimension, rendering electroweak precision observables a powerful indirect probe of $κ_t$. We show that this effect is essential for the consistent interpretation of data from future Tera-$Z$ and Giga-$W$ factories such as FCC-ee. The effect is realized in a simple renormalizable two-Higgs doublet model.

2026-04-29T15:44:53Z 12 pages, 4 figures, 1 table Lukas Born Admir Greljo Anders Eller Thomsen http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19879v2 2026-04-29T15:27:50Z

In this Letter we explore the modelling of hadron production in electromagnetic ion dissociation (EMD) processes in high-energy ultraperipheral collisions at LHC energies. Since EMD can accompany exclusive particle production in these interactions, we demonstrate that the resulting hadrons can break the exclusivity vetos typically imposed by experiments. As two representative examples, we calculate the impact on existing LHC measurements of exclusive muon pair production ($γγ\toμμ$) and exclusive coherent $J/ψ$ production. We demonstrate that accounting for this effect resolves long-standing tensions between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements.

2026-04-21T18:01:58Z 9 pages, 8 figures, version submitted to journal M. Dyndal L. A. Harland-Lang http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26780v1 2026-04-29T15:11:50Z

Multi-messenger astronomy requires real-time systems capable of rapidly responding to external alerts and sharing significant detections with partner observatories. KM3NeT, a deep-sea Cherenkov neutrino telescope in the Mediterranean Sea, is actively contributing to these efforts through a dedicated real-time analysis framework. It comprises two detectors - ARCA, optimised for TeV-PeV neutrinos, and ORCA, for GeV-TeV neutrinos - both also sensitive to MeV neutrinos from core-collapse supernovae, providing a wide field of view and an almost continuous duty cycle. The framework performs low-latency event reconstruction and classification, follows up external alerts from the multi-messenger community, monitors for core-collapse supernova neutrino bursts, and autonomously identifies and distribute cosmic neutrino alerts. Now in advanced commissioning, the KM3NeT real-time alert system represents a major step toward rapid, coordinated multi-messenger observations.

2026-04-29T15:11:50Z Contribution to the 2026 Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe session of the 60th Rencontres de Moriond Martina Marconi on behalf of the KM3NeT Collaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27028v1 2026-04-29T14:56:07Z

Based on a sample of $(10087 \pm 44) \times 10^6$ $J/ψ$ events collected with the BESIII detector at BEPCII, we report the first observation of the decay $J/ψ\rightarrow K^- Σ^0 \barΞ^++c.c.$. A partial wave analysis is performed to investigate the involved excited states. In addition to the well-established $Ξ(1690)$, a new doubly-strange hyperon $Ξ(1720) $ is observed decaying to $K^- Σ^0$ with a mass of $1721.0 \pm 5.2_{\rm stat.} \pm 3.4_{\rm syst.} ~{\rm MeV}/c^2$ and a width of $31.3 \pm 18.3_{\rm stat.} \pm 15.4_{\rm syst.} ~{\rm MeV}$, with a statistical significance exceeding $10σ$. The spin-parity hypothesis testing across various quantum number configurations reveals that the spin-parity of $Ξ(1720)$ favors $J^P = {\frac{3}{2}}^+$. Furthermore, the branching fraction of $J/ψ\rightarrow K^- Σ^0 \barΞ^++c.c.$ is determined to be $(2.68 \pm 0.04_{\rm stat.} \pm 0.17_{\rm syst.}) \times 10^{-5}$.

2026-04-29T14:56:07Z 10 pages, 3 figures BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai C. S. Akondi R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. H. An Y. Bai O. Bakina H. -R. Bao X. L. Bao M. Barbagiovanni V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann D. Cabiati H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen W. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori E. Di Fiore X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding Yi. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Shaoxu Du X. L. Du Y. Q. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang Jin Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng L. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Yunong Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. Gollub J. B. Gong J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo H. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez J. Y. Han T. T. Han X. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Y. X. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji L. K. Jia X. Q. Jia D. Jiang H. B. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao L. C. L. Jin S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana X. L. Kang X. S. Kang B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger L. Krümmel Y. Y. Kuang M. Kuessner X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li Chunkai Li Cong Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li H. P. Li Hui Li J. N. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li M. T. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. L. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat C. C. Lin C. X. Lin D. X. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu Kun Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu T. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. P. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Yi Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. L. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. X. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma Y. M. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Maity S. Malde Q. A. Malik H. X. Mao Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti X. Pan Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus G. L. Peng H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad L. Pöpping F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi M. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas M. Schernau K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi Ch. Y. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi M. H. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S. Stansilaus F. Stieler M. Stolte S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun H. Tabaharizato C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang Z. H. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian I. Uman E. van der Smagt B. Wang Bin Wang Bo Wang C. Wang Chao Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang H. J. Wang H. R. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang Mi Wang N. Y. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang T. J. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Yanning Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Zhi Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei D. J. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner H. R. Wen S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. W. Wu Z. Wu H. L. Xia L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing D. B. Xiong C. J. Xu G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan Y. Y. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang X. Y. Yang Y. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. M. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Youhua Yang Z. Y. Yang Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Yongchao Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan Jie Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang Gengyuan Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang Han Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang Jin Zhang Jiyuan Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang Q. Z. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang S. N. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Yu Zhang Z. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang Zhilong Zhang Ziyang Zhang Ziyu Zhang G. Zhao J. -P. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao Lei Zhao M. G. Zhao R. P. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. P. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng W. Q. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. X. Zhu Lin Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang M. Zhuge J. H. Zou J. Zu http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13081v2 2026-04-29T14:39:37Z

Precision measurements of Higgs boson differential production cross sections are a key tool to probe the properties of the Higgs boson and test the standard model. New physics can affect both Higgs boson production and decay, leading to deviations from the distributions that are expected in the standard model. In this paper, combined measurements of differential spectra in a fiducial region matching the experimental selections are performed, based on analyses of four Higgs boson decay channels ($γγ$, ZZ$^{(*)}$, WW$^{(*)}$, and $ττ$) using proton-proton collision data recorded with the CMS detector at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The differential measurements are extrapolated to the full phase space and combined to provide the differential spectra. A measurement of the total Higgs boson production cross section is also performed using the $γγ$ and ZZ decay channels, with a result of 53.4 $^{+2.9}_{-2.9}$ (stat) $^{+1.9}_{-1.8}$ (syst) pb, consistent with the standard model prediction of 55.6 $\pm$ 2.5 pb. The fiducial measurements are used to compute limits on Higgs boson couplings using the $κ$-framework and the SM effective field theory.

2025-04-17T16:48:08Z Replaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-23-013 (CMS Public Pages) JHEP 04 (2026) 093 CMS Collaboration 10.1007/JHEP04(2026)093 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04095v1 2026-04-29T14:23:09Z

After the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) upgrade into High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), the instantaneous luminosity is expected to reach values up to 7.5x10^34cm^2/s, causing a harsher radiation environment as well as a significant increase in data rate. The current CMS Tracker detector would not be able to operate under these conditions and it will be replaced by an upgraded version known as Phase-2. In view of the detector upgrade and as part of the design validation process, a Quality Control (QC) test flow has been developed to characterize the first pixel modules prototypes and evaluate their performance. The results of this procedure were the starting point for small design adjustments, especially for the the High Density Interconnect or HDI, the flexible low mass PCB that distributes power and signals to the module and controls the readout through a high speed data transmission channel. This talk includes qualification tests performed on the CMS Phase-2 design to ensure that all the pixel module components satisfy the upgrade specifications, for example in terms of power consumption and leakage current stability. Additionally, stress tests were conducted to probe the limits of the design, demonstrating the robustness and endurance of the module layout. Due to the differing material properties of the HDI copper layers and the silicon sensor and readout chip, temperature gradients induce different thermal expansion and contraction, resulting in mechanical stress on the bump-bond interface. For this reason, among the destructive measurements, dedicated thermal stress tests were carried out to evaluate the bump-bond strength and durability for different bump bonding techniques.

2026-04-29T14:23:09Z Giorgia Bonomelli on behalf of the CMS Tracker Group 10.1109/NSS/MIC/RTSD57106.2025.11286599 http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20932v3 2026-04-29T14:21:41Z

We investigate the time modulation of weak nuclear decays as a method to probe axion dark matter. To this end, we develop a theoretical framework to compute the $θ$-dependence of weak nuclear decays, including electron capture and $β$ decay, which enables us to predict the time variation of weak radioactivity in response to an oscillating axion dark matter background. As an application, we recast old data sets, from the weak nuclear decays of ${^{40}\text{K}}$ and ${^{137}\text{Cs}}$ taken at the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory, in order to set constraints on the axion decay constant, specifically in the axion mass range from few $10^{-23}\;$eV up to $10^{-19}\;$eV. We finally propose a new measurement at the Gran Sasso Laboratory, based on the weak nuclear decay of ${^{40}\text{K}}$ via electron capture, in order to explore even shorter timescales, thus reaching sensitivities to axion masses up to $10^{-9}\;$eV.

2024-12-30T13:22:39Z 23 pages, 3 figures, version published in Phys. Rev. D. Typo in Eq. (4.5) corrected; results unchanged Phys. Rev. D 111, 035022 (2025) Jorge Alda Carlo Broggini Giuseppe Di Carlo Luca Di Luzio Denise Piatti Stefano Rigolin Claudio Toni 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.035022 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23081v2 2026-04-29T13:39:05Z

Using $(10\,087 \pm 44) \times 10^6$ $J/ψ$ events collected with the BESIII detector, we perform the first amplitude analysis of the process $J/ψ\toγηπ^0$. The decay is dominated by the intermediate processes $J/ψ\toπ^0 b_1(1235)^0 \toγηπ^0$, $J/ψ\toπ^{0}ρ(1450)^0 \toγηπ^0$ and $J/ψ\toηh_1(1170) \toγηπ^0$. Contributions from $J/ψ\toγa_0(980)^0\toγηπ^0$, $J/ψ\toγa_2(1320)^0\toγηπ^0$ and $J/ψ\toγa_2(1700)^0\toγηπ^0$ are observed with a statistical significance exceeding $5σ$, constituting the first observation of radiative transitions of $J/ψ$ to isospin-triplet scalar mesons. The total branching fraction of $J/ψ\toγηπ^0$ is measured to be $(25.7\pm0.3\pm1.5)\times 10^{-6}$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. This result is consistent with the previous measurement, with the precision improved by more than a factor of two.

2026-03-24T11:23:21Z 12 pages, 2 figures BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai C. S. Akondi R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. H. An Y. Bai O. Bakina H. -R. Bao X. L. Bao M. Barbagiovanni V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann D. Cabiati H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen W. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori E. Di Fiore X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding Yi. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Shaoxu Du X. L. Du Y. Q. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang Jin Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng L. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Yunong Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. Gollub J. B. Gong J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo H. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez J. Y. Han T. T. Han X. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Y. X. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji L. K. Jia X. Q. Jia Z. K. Jia D. Jiang H. B. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao L. C. L. Jin S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana X. L. Kang X. S. Kang B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger L. Krümmel Y. Y. Kuang M. Kuessner X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li Chunkai Li Cong Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li H. P. Li Hui Li J. N. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li M. T. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. L. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat C. C. Lin C. X. Lin D. X. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu Kun Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu T. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. P. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Yi Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. L. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. X. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma Y. M. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Maity S. Malde Q. A. Malik H. X. Mao Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti X. Pan Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus G. L. Peng H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad L. Pöpping F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi M. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas M. Schernau K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi Ch. Y. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi M. H. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S. Stansilaus F. Stieler M. Stolte S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun H. Tabaharizato C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang Z. H. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian I. Uman E. van der Smagt B. Wang Bin Wang Bo Wang C. Wang Chao Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang H. J. Wang H. R. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang Mi Wang N. Y. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang T. J. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Yanning Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Zhi Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei D. J. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner H. R. Wen S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. W. Wu Z. Wu H. L. Xia L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing D. B. Xiong C. J. Xu G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan Y. Y. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang X. Y. Yang Y. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. M. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Youhua Yang Z. Y. Yang Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Yongchao Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan Jie Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang Gengyuan Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang Han Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang Jin Zhang Jiyuan Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang Q. Z. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang S. N. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Yu Zhang Z. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang Zhilong Zhang Ziyang Zhang Ziyu Zhang G. Zhao J. -P. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao Lei Zhao M. G. Zhao R. P. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. P. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng W. Q. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. X. Zhu Lin Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang M. Zhuge J. H. Zou J. Zu 10.1103/8wdg-kwqj http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.23091v2 2026-04-29T13:34:10Z

The top-quark mass is measured using top-quark decays producing an isolated lepton and $J/ψ$ meson reconstructed in its $μ^+μ^-$ decay mode. The data sample was recorded with the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$. The measurement is based on the invariant mass $m(\ell μ^+μ^-)$ of the system made of the isolated lepton $\ell$ from the $W$ boson decay and the non-isolated $μ^+μ^-$ pair from a $J/ψ$ decay of a $b$-hadron, exploiting its sensitivity to the top-quark mass. An unbinned maximum-likelihood fit to the $m(\ell μ^+μ^-)$ distribution is performed to extract the top-quark mass. The top-quark mass is measured to be $m_{top} = 172.17 \pm 0.80 (stat) \pm 0.81 (syst) \pm 1.07 (recoil)$ GeV, with a total uncertainty of 1.56 GeV. The third uncertainty arises from changing the dipole parton shower gluon-recoil scheme used in top-quark decays.

2025-11-28T11:23:03Z 50 pages in total, author list starting page 33, 19 figures, 8 tables, published on JHEP. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at <http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/TOPQ-2018-19>. HEP-Data record at <https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins3087833> JHEP 04 (2026) 099 ATLAS Collaboration 10.1007/JHEP04(2026)099 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26581v1 2026-04-29T12:01:29Z

Identifying compact binary coalescences buried within the non-Gaussian and non-stationary data taken by gravitational-wave interferometers requires sophisticated search pipelines, such as the PyCBC analysis. A critical task for these pipelines is determining the statistical significance of candidate events by comparing a "ranking statistic" against a large background set. Currently, PyCBC's ranking statistic incorporates the joint probability of the relative arrival times, phase delays and amplitude ratios of the signals seen in different detectors. These parameters are tightly constrained for physical signals but are more broadly distributed for noise. PyCBC currently relies on precomputed binned histogram-based density estimators using Monte-Carlo simulations to obtain these probabilities. However, the storage requirements for these histograms scale prohibitively with the size of the detector network, preventing PyCBC from effectively analyzing four or more detectors. In this paper, we demonstrate that these histograms can be replaced with normalizing flows, a machine learning approach to density estimation. Applying this method to data from the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Virgo, we demonstrate that normalizing flows reduce storage requirements by over three orders of magnitude. Furthermore, our approach maintains high sensitivity, with less than a 0.05% drop in the recovery of simulated signals at a fixed false-alarm rate. By relaxing several simplifying assumptions previously required by Monte-Carlo methods, we also achieved up to a 6.55% increase in recovered signals for specific detector combinations. These results suggest that normalizing flows provide a scalable, flexible framework for the PyCBC pipeline as it expands to include four or more detectors, or to extend to searches for precessing or higher-mode signals, in future observing runs.

2026-04-29T12:01:29Z 15 pages, 10 figures Sam Insley Michael J. Williams Rahul Dhurkunde Ian Harry http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23030v2 2026-04-29T09:10:01Z

Hadronic molecules $\mathfrak{M}=J/ψB_{c}^{+}$ and $\widetilde{\mathfrak{ \ M}}=η_{c}B_{c}^{\ast +}$ are investigated in the framework of QCD sum rule method. These particles with spin-parities $J^{\mathrm{P}}=1^+$ have the quark contents $cc \overline{c}\overline{b}$. We compute their masses and current couplings and find that they are numerically very close to each other coinciding within accuracy of the sum rule method. Therefore, we concentrate on the molecule $J/ψB_{c}^{+}$ and explore features of this state in a detailed form. Our prediction $m=(9740 \pm 70)~\mathrm{MeV}$ for its mass means that $\mathfrak{M}$ easily decays to pairs of ordinary mesons through strong interactions. There are two mechanisms responsible for transformations of $\mathfrak{M}$ to conventional mesons. The fall-apart mechanism generates the dominant decay channels $\mathfrak{M} \to J/ψB_{c}^{+}$ and $\mathfrak{M} \to η_{c}B_{c}^{\ast +}$. Annihilation of $ \overline{c}c$ quarks triggers subdominant processes with various final-state $B$ and $D$ mesons: Six of such channels are considered in this work. The partial widths all of decays are computed using the three-point sum rule approach. The width $Γ[ \mathfrak{M}]=(121 \pm 17)~ \mathrm{MeV }$ of the hadronic axial-vector molecule $\mathfrak{M}$, as well as its mass provide valuable information for running and future experiments.

2025-12-28T18:14:43Z 15 Pages and 6 Figures S. S. Agaev K. Azizi H. Sundu http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15585v2 2026-04-29T08:51:36Z

Discrimination of fast neutrons, thermal neutrons, and $γ$ rays in mixed radiation fields is important for radiation monitoring, reactor-related measurements, and background suppression in nuclear experiments. In this work, we investigate a compact plastic-scintillator sensor composed of EJ276 or EJ200 optically coupled to an EJ426 thermal neutron screen and read out by a single photomultiplier tube (PMT). The $γ$ equivalent energy response of the detector assemblies was calibrated using $^{137}$Cs, $^{22}$Na, and $^{60}$Co sources through Compton edge analysis, and pulse shape discrimination was evaluated with an AmBe neutron source under different moderator thicknesses. The EJ200+EJ426 assembly provides a well separated discrimination between thermal-neutron capture events and $γ$ dominated events over the measured range, with a figure of merit greater than 5. In contrast, the EJ276+EJ426 assembly produced three identifiable signal populations associated with $γ$ rays, fast neutrons, and thermal neutrons. These results show that the proposed sensor architecture is a promising compact approach for mixed field radiation applications

2025-12-17T16:45:13Z Sensors 26 (2026) 3462 Yuhang Liu Fengpeng An Guang Luo Wei Wang Xuesong Zhang Dixiao Lu Xiaohao Yin 10.3390/s26113462