https://arxiv.org/api/kHQdHYJQuEfle7ckYWw2rRO+8XA2026-06-15T02:28:44Z6039869015http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00615v1Observation of the rare decay $η$ $\to$ $μ^+μ^-$e$^+$e$^-$2026-05-01T12:32:29ZA first observation of the rare decay $η$ $\to$ $μ^+μ^-$e$^+$e$^-$ is reported by the CMS Collaboration at the CERN LHC. The result is based on a proton-proton collision data sample at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38.0 fb$^{-1}$, acquired in 2022 using a high-rate dimuon trigger. Using the $η$ $\to$ $μ^+μ^-γ$ decay channel for normalization, the branching fraction is measured to be $\mathcal{B}$($η$ $\to$ $μ^+μ^-$e$^+$e$^-$) = (2.4 $\pm$ 0.8)$\times$ 10$^{-6}$, with the uncertainty including statistical and systematic sources as well as the $\mathcal{B}$($η$ $\to$ $μ^+μ^-γ$) uncertainty. This result is close to two orders of magnitude smaller than the existing limit, and is consistent with recent theoretical predictions.2026-05-01T12:32:29ZSubmitted to Physical Review Letters. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/BPH-24-001 (CMS Public Pages) CMS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00549v1Bounds on massive graviton-like particles from searches for axion-like particles coupling to photons2026-05-01T10:04:25ZLimits on spin-0 axion-like-particles (ALPs) coupling to photons are reinterpreted as constraints on massive spin-2 graviton-like-particles (GLPs) with universal coupling $α_\text{G}/M_\text{P}$ (where $M_\text{P}$ is the reduced Planck mass) to the Standard Model fields. A minimally model-dependent recasting is performed, exploiting the formally analogous production and detection mechanisms for both particle types, based on the Primakoff and Gertsenshtein effects, i.e., photon-axion/graviton conversion. Constraints originally derived in the ALP mass vs. photon-coupling plane ($m_\text{a}, g_{\text{a}γ}$) are translated into the corresponding bounds in the GLP ($m_\text{G}, α_\text{G}/M_\text{P}$) parameter space over the full mass range, $m_\text{a,G} \approx 10^{-20}$--$10^{14}$eV probed in current and future experimental setups including cavity-based detectors (haloscopes and resonant upconversion devices), helioscopes, magnetometers, optical interferometers, beam dumps, fixed-target, and collider experiments, as well as astrophysical and cosmological constraints. Generic scenarios are considered in which GLPs are a dark matter candidate and not. Whereas current ALP searches do not set stronger bounds on massive spin-2 particles than fifth-force tests, future magnetometers, two-beam interferometers, and upconversion experiments have the potential to provide very strong sensitivity, down to $α_\text{G}/M_\text{P} \approx 10^{-32} \text{GeV}^{-1}$, for light graviton-like particles with $m_\text{G}\lesssim 10^{-8}$eV. These future detectors exhibit comparatively greater sensitivity to massive gravitons than to axions. For massive gravitons at the TeV scale, exclusive diphoton decay searches, employed in ALP studies, offer a complementary approach to standard searches for spin-2 resonances in other inclusive final states.2026-05-01T10:04:25Z45 pages, 9 figuresJordan GuéDavid d'Enterriahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15834v2Comprehensive analyses of rare $ Λ_b \rightarrow Λ\ell^+ \ell^-$, $Σ_b \rightarrow Σ\ell^+ \ell^-$ and $Ξ_b \rightarrow Ξ\ell^+ \ell^-$ decays in 2HDM2026-05-01T09:46:19ZWe investigate rare special dileptonic decays of $ Λ_b$, $Σ_b$ and $Ξ_b $ baryons in the Standard Model and context of the general Two-Higgs-Doublet Model with Type III. Specifically, we consider the decays $ Λ_b \rightarrow Λ\ell^+ \ell^-$, $Σ_b \rightarrow Σ\ell^+ \ell^-$ and $Ξ_b \rightarrow Ξ\ell^+ \ell^-$, where $\ell$ represents $μ$ or $τ$ lepton. By studying these rare decays, we aim to assess the impact of the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model with Type III on various observables, such as the differential branching ratio, total branching ratio, and lepton forward-backward asymmetries using the decay amplitude and the transition matrix elements in terms of form factors calculated via light cone QCD in full theory. We compare our results to those of the Standard Model, as well as existing lattice QCD predictions and experimental data, to assess the agreement and viability of the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model with Type III. Furthermore, we highlight the potential for experimental investigations of these decay channels in the near future. The soon-to-be updated LHCb and/or Belle II detectors, renowned for their capabilities in studying rare decays, present excellent opportunities for probing the predicted branching ratios.2026-04-17T08:36:41Z35 Pages, 27 Figures and 6 TablesZ. TavukoğluA. T. OlgunK. Azizihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00430v1Twist-2 relations for the twist-3 tensor-polarized distribution function $f_{LT}$ of a spin-1 hadron by the operator-product-expansion method2026-05-01T06:05:05ZIn a spin-1 hadron, tensor-polarized parton distribution functions (PDFs) exist. The twist-2 function is $f_{1LL}$ and a twist-3 one is $f_{LT}$. Because an experiment is under preparation at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab) to measure the cross section of electron-deuteron deep inelastic scattering with the tensor-polarized deuteron target, these PDFs need to be understood theoretically. Especially, measurements will be done in a relatively low-$Q^2$ region at JLab, so that twist-3 contributions could become sizable in the cross section. In a previous work, a twist-2 relation was derived for $f_{LT}$ in terms of $f_{1LL}$ by using a nonlocal operator, and it corresponds to the Wandzura-Wilczek (WW) relation between $g_1$ and $g_2$. In addition, another relation similar to the Burkhardt-Cottingham (BC) sum rule was obtained. It is known that a formal way to derive the WW relation and the BC sum rule is to use the operator product expansion (OPE) with local operators. In this work, the WW-like relation and the BC-like sum rule for $f_{LT}$ are derived by using the local OPE method as a reliable independent way to establish these relations.2026-05-01T06:05:05Z5 pagesS. KumanoKenshi Kurokihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00339v1Evidence for Quark Confinement in the Proton2026-05-01T01:43:06ZThe strong interaction is the fundamental force that holds quarks and the gluon force carriers together to form protons and neutrons and also binds the atomic nucleus. The theory governing quark-gluon interactions is Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). A wide variety of experimental data teaches us that quarks and gluons cannot be observed in isolation, a phenomenon known as confinement that is unique to QCD. But no one has used QCD to mathematically prove confinement. Here we show how to define and measure the force on quarks in the proton using available experimental data. Direct evidence for confinement is obtained because the force is found to be attractive and constant for a wide range of quark positions. This work guides future experimental efforts at future Electron-Ion Colliders aimed at obtaining a rigorous quantitative understanding of confinement and the origin of nuclear mass.2026-05-01T01:43:06Z20 pages, 2 figures. Includes 6 pages of Supplementary MaterialsXiangdong JiGerald A. MillerChen Yanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05186v2$b \to c$ semileptonic sum rule: SU(3)$_{\rm{F}}$ symmetry violation2026-05-01T01:41:50ZTo clarify possible deviations in $b\to cτ\overlineν$ processes, the $b\to c$ semileptonic sum rule provides a valuable tool. This relation, derived based on heavy quark symmetry (HQS), offers a powerful consistency check among experimental results. In this work, we extend the previously proposed sum rule for $\{B\to D^{(*)} l\overlineν,\,Λ_b\to Λ_c l\overlineν\}$ to include $\{B_s\to D_s^{(*)} l\overlineν,\,Ξ_b\to Ξ_c l\overlineν\}$, thereby enabling more useful cross-checks. Although the relation is supported by HQS and SU(3) flavor symmetry, both symmetries are broken in reality, and the size of the violation needs to be quantified to assess the validity of the sum rule. While the violation is expected to be moderate based on chiral perturbation theory, we perform a numerical evaluation and compare it with future experimental sensitivities. We find that the violation remains smaller than the expected experimental uncertainty. Therefore another new physics agnostic and predictive sum rules are constructed to check the consistency.2026-04-06T21:32:09Z8 pages, 1+3 figures, two tables, contribution to the 2026 QCD session of the 60th Rencontres de MoriondSyuhei Igurohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00232v1Cosmic Ray Physics with the KM3NeT Telescopes2026-04-30T21:09:37ZThe KM3NeT research infrastructure instruments a large volume of seawater using photomultiplier tubes, which are sensitive to the Cherenkov radiation stimulated by the products of neutrino interactions in the water, as well as that stimulated by atmospheric muons which penetrate the sea depths. The KM3NeT/ARCA and KM3NeT/ORCA detectors are situated at different depths in the Mediterranean Sea, with different extension and densities of the photo-detection elements. Although operating independently, taken as a whole the two detectors provide a wide energy coverage for the atmospheric muons flux. Through the detection and analysis of these atmospheric muons, a variety of physics studies are possible with the KM3NeT telescope. A measurement of the atmospheric muon neutrino flux has been carried out with data from the initial six detection units of the KM3NeT/ORCA detector. Relatedly to the atmospheric muon flux, the recent atmospheric lepton model `Daemonflux' has been incorporated into the KM3NeT Monte Carlo event generator for atmospheric muon bundles. This has resulted in a stark alleviation of the atmospheric muon data-Monte Carlo simulation discrepancy - a systemic issue in cosmic ray experiments referred to as the `Muon Puzzle' - and a comprehensive description of the atmospheric muon data in KM3NeT. These atmospheric muons are also used in the calibration of the detectors, as well as constraining systematic uncertainties in the detectors such as the optical properties of the instrumented seawater. An overview of these topics, and other cosmic ray analyses, is presented.2026-04-30T21:09:37ZContribution to the 2026 Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe session of the 60th Rencontres de MoriondBrían Ó Fearraighon behalf of the KM3NeT Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17310v2Search for new physics in the final state with a single photon and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV2026-04-30T19:51:54ZA search for new physics in events featuring a single photon and missing transverse momentum is presented, using proton-proton $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 101 fb$^{-1}$ collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC between 2017 and 2018. This analysis, combined with a previous study of 36 fb$^{-1}$ of 2016 data (totaling 137 fb$^{-1}$), reveals no significant deviations from standard model expectations. The results are then used to establish 95% confidence level limits on parameters in theoretical models involving dark matter and large extra dimensions. Compared to the 2016-only analysis, this search achieves up to a 14% improvement in exclusion reach for mediator masses in simplified dark matter models, along with 11% and 10% enhancements in the limits on the effective field theory suppression scale and the fundamental Planck scale, respectively. These results are the most stringent constraints on these parameters to date.2025-11-21T15:25:58ZReplaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/SUS-23-016 (CMS Public Pages)Phys. Rev. D 113 (2026) 072020 CMS Collaboration10.1103/f9r8-styjhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21641v2Search for dijet resonances with data scouting in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV2026-04-30T19:33:10ZA search is presented for narrow resonances, with a mass between 0.6 and 1.8 TeV, decaying to pairs of jets, in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV. The search is performed using dijets that are reconstructed, selected, and recorded in a compact form by the high-level trigger in a technique referred to as "data scouting", from data collected in 2016$-$2018 corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 117 fb$^{-1}$. The dijet mass spectra are well described by a smooth parameterization, and no significant evidence for the production of new particles is observed. Model-independent upper limits are presented on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for the individual cases of narrow quark-quark, quark-gluon, and gluon-gluon resonances, and are compared to the predictions from a variety of models of narrow dijet resonance production. The upper limit on the coupling of a dark matter mediator to quarks is presented as a function of the mediator mass. The sensitivity of this search goes beyond what is expected from statistical scaling with the integrated luminosity alone, as a consequence of the use of fewer parameters in the background function within a more robust statistical procedure.2025-10-24T16:54:45ZReplaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/EXO-23-004 (CMS Public Pages)JHEP 04 (2026) 133 CMS Collaboration10.1007/JHEP04(2026)133http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00093v1A New Robust Constraint on the Self-interaction Cross-section of Dark Matter with Double Radio Relic Clusters2026-04-30T18:00:02ZMerging galaxy clusters are a promising laboratory for measuring the self-interaction cross-section (SICS) of dark matter. However, previous studies have focused on galaxy-mass offsets, which numerical simulations have shown to be intrinsically small because galaxies remain tightly coupled to the dominant dark matter potential even with significant self-interaction. Their interpretation is further complicated by unknowns of the merger phase, geometry, and initial conditions. In this paper, we overcome these obstacles by introducing the shock-to-shock distance, traced by double radio relics, as a merger chronometer that time-stamps the post-pericenter dynamical phase. Because the propagation speed of merger shocks is nearly independent of the SICS, while the halo-to-halo distance is depressed by SIDM-induced drag, the ratio of the two distances translates directly into a constraint on sigma/m. Applying this method to a gold sample of eleven cluster mergers hosting symmetric double radio relics, we determine a 68% upper limit on the SICS of sigma/m < 0.22 cm^2/g. This is the first constraint from cluster collisions that fully marginalizes over mass uncertainty, viewing angle, collision speed, merger phase, impact parameter, and gas profile slope.2026-04-30T18:00:02Z13 pages, 8 figuresM. James JeeDongak ParkWonki Leehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.28133v1The DAMSA Experiment2026-04-30T17:17:55ZDAMSA (DArk Messenger Searches at an Accelerator) is a novel short-baseline accelerator/beam dump experiment aimed at probing short-lived physics processes, including searches for evidence of a dark sector of particle physics and well-motivated rare Standard Model signals. Motivated by open questions in neutrino physics and the absence of conclusive evidence for conventional weakly interacting massive particles, DAMSA targets MeV-to-sub-GeV dark-sector messengers with feeble couplings that can be produced in abundance at a beam dump/target. By employing an ultra-short baseline, DAMSA is uniquely positioned to overcome the beam-dump "ceiling" that limits sensitivity to fast decaying particles in longer-baseline experiments. The conceptual design emphasizes a beam-dump production scheme combined with a compact detector optimized for rare decays while mitigating intense neutron-induced backgrounds, inherent to high-power proton beams. To validate the experimental strategy and detector technologies, the DAMSA Path-Finder (DPF) proof-of-concept experiment is also proposed, focusing on axion-like particles decaying to two photons, as the benchmark physics case and operating with 8 GeV electron beams at SLAC Linac-to-ESA (LESA) facility. Successful realization of DPF will establish the feasibility of the DAMSA approach, enabling a broad and powerful program to explore short-lived new physics and precision Standard Model processes in a previously inaccessible regime. This paper outlines the technical details of DAMSA's physics goals, key experimental challenges, and how to overcome them.2026-04-30T17:17:55Z35 pages, 26 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2601.15255Prithak BhattaraiAndrew BrandtAlan BrossBradley BrownSamriddha ChakrabortyHaohui CheBhupal DevBhaskar DuttaJuan V. EstradaEric GarciaAnthony GomezGajendra GurungBrian Joshua Gomez HernandezWooyoung JangJay Hyun JoKrzysztof JodłowskiDoojin KimEunsu KimHyunyong KimShin Hyung KimYoung-Kee KimJing LiuChang-Seong MoonDonna NaplesDavid NygrenMinseok OhVittorio PaoloneHyangkyu ParkJong-Chul ParkNathaniel J. PastikaRohit RautJuergen ReichenbacherPaul RubinovEunsuk SeoVeronika ShalamovaSeodong ShinMelvin ShochetAdrian ThompsonYau WahShawn WesterdaleGuang YangUn-Ki YangInseok YoonJaehoon Yuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.28063v1Phenomenology of $f_2(1270)$ photoproduction at energies measured with the CLAS facility2026-04-30T16:09:44ZWe investigate the photoproduction of the tensor meson $f_2(1270)$ on the proton within a Regge-based framework, focusing on the reaction $γp \to p f_2(1270)$ in the few-GeV energy region. The production mechanism is modeled through the exchange of vector-meson Regge trajectories in the $t$-channel, including both $ρ$ and $ω$ exchanges with phenomenologically motivated couplings. The scattering amplitudes are derived using Reggeized propagators and effective hadronic vertices, allowing for the calculation of differential cross sections in the narrow-width approximation. We further extend the analysis to the $π^+π^-$ invariant mass distribution by incorporating a relativistic Breit--Wigner description of the $f_2(1270)$ resonance.2026-04-30T16:09:44Z5 pages, 2 figuresK. E. S. MendesD. T da SilvaM. L. L. da Silvahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03083v2First evidence of the $B_s^0\rightarrow K^-π^+γ$ decay2026-04-30T15:31:37ZThe first search for the $B_s^0\rightarrow K^-π^+γ$ decay in the range $796<m(K^-π^+)<1800\,\text{MeV/}c^2$ is performed using data from proton-proton collisions collected by the LHCb experiment at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8, and 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb$^{-1}$. The photons are reconstructed through their conversion into an electron-positron pair, which significantly improves the mass resolution of the reconstructed decays with respect to decays with an unconverted photon. A signal excess with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations is measured, constituting the first experimental evidence for this decay. In the range $796<m(K^-π^+)<996\,\text{MeV/}c^2$, the ratio ${\cal R}$ between the branching fractions of the signal decay and the favoured $\kern 0.18em\overline{\kern -0.18em B}{}^0\rightarrow K^- π^+γ$ decay is measured to be ${\cal R} = (3.7\pm1.2\pm0.4)\times10^{-2}$ where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. This measurement is consistent with the value predicted in the Standard Model. In the range $996<m(K^-π^+)<1800\,\text{MeV/}c^2$, the ratio ${\cal R} = (0.2\pm2.7\pm1.3)\times10^{-2}$ is measured.2026-01-06T15:15:52ZAll figures and tables, along with machine-readable versions and any supplementary material and additional information, are available at https://lbfence.cern.ch/alcm/public/analysis/full-details/5390/ (LHCb public pages)Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (2026) 171801 LHCb collaborationR. AaijA. S. W. AbdelmottelebC. Abellan BetetaF. AbudinénT. AckernleyA. A. AdefisoyeB. AdevaM. AdinolfiP. AdlarsonC. AgapopoulouC. A. AidalaZ. AjaltouniS. AkarK. AkibaM. AktharP. AlbicoccoJ. AlbrechtR. AleksiejunasF. AlessioP. Alvarez CartelleR. AmalricS. AmatoJ. L. AmeyY. AmhisL. AnL. AnderliniM. AnderssonP. AndreolaM. AndreottiS. Andres EstradaA. AnelliD. AoC. ArataF. ArchilliZ. AregM. ArgentonS. Arguedas CuendisL. ArnoneA. ArtamonovM. ArtusoE. AslanidesR. Ataíde Da SilvaM. AtzeniB. AudurierJ. A. AuthierD. BacherI. Bachiller PereaS. BachmannM. BachmayerJ. J. BackP. Baladron RodriguezV. BalaguraA. BalboniW. BaldiniZ. BaldwinL. BalzaniH. BaoJ. Baptista de Souza LeiteC. Barbero PretelM. BarbettiI. R. BarbosaR. J. BarlowM. BarnyakovS. BarsukW. BarterJ. BartzS. BashirB. BatsukhP. B. BattistaA. BavarcheeA. BayA. BeckM. BeckerF. BedeschiI. B. BediagaN. A. BehlingS. BelinA. BellavistaK. BelousI. BelovI. BelyaevG. BenaneG. BencivenniE. Ben-HaimA. BerezhnoyR. BernetS. Bernet AndresA. BertolinF. BettiJ. BexO. BezshyykoS. BhattacharyaM. S. BiekerN. V. BiesuzA. BiolchiniM. BirchF. C. R. BishopA. BitadzeA. BizzetiT. BlakeF. BlancJ. E. BlankS. BluskV. BocharnikovJ. A. BoelhauveO. Boente GarciaT. BoettcherA. BohareA. BoldyrevC. BolognaniR. BolzonellaR. B. BonacciN. BondarA. BordeliusF. BorgatoS. BorghiM. BorsatoJ. T. BorsukE. BottalicoS. A. BouchibaM. BovillT. J. V. BowcockA. BoyerC. BozziJ. D. BrandenburgA. Brea RodriguezN. BreerJ. BrodzickaJ. BrownD. BrunduE. BuchananM. Burgos MarcosC. BurrC. ButiJ. S. ButterJ. BuytaertW. ByczynskiS. CadedduH. CaiY. CaiA. CailletR. CalabreseL. CaleficeM. CalviM. Calvo GomezP. Camargo MagalhaesJ. I. Cambon BouzasP. CampanaA. C. CamposA. F. Campoverde QuezadaS. CapelliM. CaporaleL. CapriottiR. Caravaca-MoraA. CarboneL. Carcedo SalgadoR. CardinaleA. CardiniP. CarnitiL. CarusA. Casais VidalR. CasparyG. CasseM. CattaneoG. CavalleroV. CavalliniS. CelaniI. CelestinoS. CesareA. J. ChadwickI. ChahrourH. ChangM. CharlesPh. CharpentierE. ChatzianagnostouR. CheaibM. ChefdevilleC. ChenJ. ChenS. ChenZ. ChenA. Chen HuM. CherifA. ChernovS. ChernyshenkoX. ChiotopoulosV. ChobanovaM. ChrzaszczA. ChubykinV. ChulikovP. CiambroneX. Cid VidalG. CiezarekP. CifraP. E. L. ClarkeM. ClemencicH. V. CliffJ. ClosierC. Cocha ToapaxiV. CocoJ. CoganE. CognerasL. CojocariuS. CollavitiP. CollinsT. ColomboM. ColonnaA. Comerma-MontellsL. CongedoJ. ConnaughtonA. ContuN. CookeG. CordovaC. CoronelI. CorredoiraA. CorreiaG. CortiJ. Cottee MeldrumB. CouturierD. C. CraikM. Cruz TorresM. Cubero CamposE. Curras RiveraR. CurrieC. L. Da SilvaS. DadabaevX. DaiE. Dall'OccoJ. DalsenoC. D'AmbrosioJ. DanielG. DarzeA. DavidsonJ. E. DaviesO. De Aguiar FranciscoC. De AngelisF. De BenedettiJ. de BoerK. De BruynS. De CapuaM. De CianU. De Freitas Carneiro Da GracaE. De LuciaJ. M. De MirandaL. De PaulaM. De SerioP. De SimoneF. De VellisJ. A. de VriesF. DebernardisD. DecampS. DekkersL. Del BuonoB. DelaneyJ. DengV. DenysenkoO. DeschampsF. DettoriB. DeyP. Di NezzaI. DiachkovS. DidenkoS. DingY. DingL. DittmannV. DobishukA. D. DochevaA. DohenyC. DongF. DordeiA. C. dos ReisA. D. DowlingL. DreyfusW. DuanP. DudaL. DufourV. DukP. DuranteM. M. DurasJ. M. DurhamO. D. DurmusA. DziurdaA. DzyubaS. EasoE. EcksteinU. EgedeA. EgorychevV. EgorychevS. EisenhardtE. EjopuL. EklundM. ElashriD. Elizondo BlancoJ. EllbrachtS. ElyA. EneJ. EschleT. EvansF. FabianoS. FaghihL. N. FalcaoB. FangR. FantechiL. FantiniM. FariaK. FarmerF. FassinD. FazziniL. FelkowskiM. FengA. Fernandez CasaniM. Fernandez GomezA. D. FernezF. FerrariF. Ferreira RodriguesM. FerrilloM. Ferro-LuzziS. FilippovR. A. FiniM. FioriniM. FirlejK. L. FischerD. S. FitzgeraldC. FitzpatrickT. FiutowskiF. FleuretA. FominM. FontanaL. A. ForemanR. FortyD. Foulds-HoltV. Franco LimaM. Franco SevillaM. FrankE. FranzosoG. FrauC. FreiD. A. FridayJ. FuQ. FühringT. FulghesuG. GalatiM. D. GalatiA. Gallas TorreiraD. GalliS. GambettaM. GandelmanP. GandiniB. GanieH. GaoR. GaoT. Q. GaoY. GaoY. GaoY. GaoL. M. Garcia MartinP. Garcia MorenoJ. García PardiñasP. GardnerL. GarridoC. GasparA. GavrikovL. L. GerkenE. GersabeckM. GersabeckT. GershonS. GhizzoZ. GhorbanimoghaddamF. I. GiasemisV. GibsonH. K. GiemzaA. L. GilmanM. GiovannettiA. GioventùL. GirardeyM. A. GizaF. C. GlaserV. V. GligorovC. GöbelL. Golinka-BezshyykoE. GolobardesD. GolubkovA. GolutvinS. Gomez FernandezW. GomulkaI. Gonçales VazF. Goncalves AbrantesM. GoncerzG. GongJ. A. GoodingI. V. GorelovC. GottiE. GovorkovaJ. P. GrabowskiL. A. Granado CardosoE. GraugésE. GraveriniL. GrazetteG. GrazianiA. T. GrecuN. A. GrieserL. GrilloS. GromovC. GuM. GuariseL. GuerryA. -K. GuseinovE. GushchinY. GuzT. GysK. HabermannT. HadavizadehC. HadjivasiliouG. HaefeliC. HaenS. HakenG. HallettP. M. HamiltonJ. HammerichQ. HanX. HanS. Hansmann-MenzemerL. HaoN. HarnewT. H. HarrisM. HartmannS. HashmiJ. HeN. HeatleyA. HedesF. HemmerC. HendersonR. HendersonR. D. L. HendersonA. M. HennequinK. HennessyL. HenryJ. HerdP. Herrero GasconJ. HeuelA. HeynA. HicheurG. Hijano MendizabalJ. HorswillR. HouY. HouD. C. HoustonN. HowarthW. HuX. HuW. HulsbergenR. J. HunterM. HushchynD. HutchcroftM. IdzikD. IlinP. IltenA. IniukhinA. IohnerA. IshteevK. IvshinH. JageS. J. Jaimes EllesS. JakobsenT. JakoubekE. JansB. K. JashalA. JawaheryC. JayaweeraA. JelavicV. JevticZ. JiaE. JiangX. JiangY. JiangY. J. JiangE. Jimenez MoyaN. JindalM. JohnA. John Rubesh RajanD. JohnsonC. R. JonesS. JoshiB. JostJ. Juan CastellaN. JurikI. JuszczakK. KalecinskaD. KaminarisS. KandybeiM. KaneY. KangC. KarM. KaracsonA. KauniskangasJ. W. KautzM. K. KazaneckiF. KeizerM. KenzieT. KetelB. KhanjiA. KharisovaS. KholodenkoG. KhreichF. KirazT. KirnV. S. KirsebomS. KlaverN. KleijneA. KleimenovaD. K. KlekotsK. KlimaszewskiM. R. KmiecT. KnospeR. KolbS. KoliievL. KolkA. KonoplyannikovP. KopciewiczP. KoppenburgA. KorchinI. KostiukO. KotS. KotriakhovaE. KowalczykA. KozachukP. KravchenkoL. KravchukO. KravcovM. KrepsP. KrokovnyW. KrupaW. KrzemienO. KshyvanskyiS. KubisM. KucharczykV. KudryavtsevE. KulikovaA. KupscV. KushnirB. KutsenkoJ. KvapilI. KyryllinD. LacarrereP. Laguarta GonzalezA. LaiA. LampisD. LancieriniC. Landesa GomezJ. J. LaneG. LanfranchiC. LangenbruchJ. LangerT. LathamF. LazzariC. LazzeroniR. Le GacH. LeeR. LefèvreA. LeflatS. LegotinM. LehurauxE. Lemos CidO. LeroyT. LesiakE. D. LesserB. LeveringtonA. LiC. LiC. LiH. LiJ. LiK. LiL. LiP. LiP. -R. LiQ. LiT. LiT. LiY. LiY. LiY. LiZ. LianQ. LiangX. LiangZ. LiangS. LibralonA. LightbodyC. LinT. LinR. LindnerH. LintonR. LitvinovD. LiuF. L. LiuG. LiuK. LiuS. LiuW. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. L. LiuG. Loachamin OrdonezI. LoboA. Lobo SalviaA. LoiT. LongF. C. L. LopesJ. H. LopesA. Lopez HuertasC. Lopez IribarnegarayS. López SoliñoQ. LuC. LucarelliD. LucchesiM. Lucio MartinezY. LuoA. LupatoE. LuppiK. LynchX. -R. LyuG. M. MaH. MaS. MaccoliniF. MachefertF. MaciucB. MackI. MackayL. M. MackeyL. R. Madhan MohanM. J. MaduraiD. MagdalinskiD. MaisuzenkoJ. J. MalczewskiS. MaldeL. MalentaccaA. MalininT. MaltsevG. MancaG. MancinelliC. MancusoR. Manera EscaleroF. M. ManganellaD. ManuzziD. MarangottoJ. F. MarchandR. MarchevskiU. MarconiE. MarianiS. MarianiC. Marin BenitoJ. MarksA. M. MarshallL. MartelG. MartelliG. MartellottiL. MartinazzoliM. MartinelliD. Martinez GomezD. Martinez SantosF. Martinez VidalA. Martorell i GranollersA. MassafferriR. MatevA. MathadV. MatiuninC. MatteuzziK. R. MattioliA. MauriE. MauriceJ. MauricioP. MayencourtJ. Mazorra de CosM. MazurekD. Mazzanti TaranconM. McCannN. T. McHughA. McNabR. McNultyB. MeadowsD. MelnychukD. Mendoza GranadaP. Menendez Valdes PerezF. M. MengM. MerkA. MerliL. Meyer GarciaD. MiaoH. MiaoM. MikhasenkoD. A. MilanesA. MinottiE. MinucciT. MirallesB. MitreskaD. S. MitzelR. MocanuA. ModakL. MoeserR. D. MoiseE. F. Molina CardenasT. MombächerM. MonkT. MonnardS. MonteilA. Morcillo GomezG. MorelloM. J. MorelloM. P. MorgenthalerA. MoroJ. MoronW. MorrenA. B. MorrisA. G. MorrisR. MountainZ. M. MuE. MuhammadF. MuheimM. MulderK. MüllerF. Muñoz-RojasV. MytrochenkoP. NaikT. NakadaR. NandakumarG. NapoletanoI. NastevaM. NeedhamE. NekrasovaN. NeriS. NeubertN. NeufeldP. NeustroevJ. NicoliniD. NicotraE. M. NielN. NikitinL. NisiQ. NiuB. K. NjokiP. NogarolliP. NoggaC. NormandJ. Novoa FernandezG. NowakC. NunezH. N. NurA. Oblakowska-MuchaV. ObraztsovT. OeserA. OkhotnikovO. OkhrimenkoR. OldemanF. OlivaE. Olivart PinoM. OloccoR. H. O'NeilJ. S. Ordonez SotoD. OsthuesJ. M. Otalora GoicocheaP. OwenA. OyangurenO. OzcelikF. PaciollaA. PadeeK. O. PadekenB. PagareT. PajeroA. PalanoL. PaliniM. PalutanC. PanX. PanS. PanebiancoS. PaniskakiG. PanshinL. PaolucciA. PapanestisM. PappagalloL. L. PappalardoC. PappenheimerC. ParkesD. ParmarG. PassalevaD. PassaroA. PastoreM. PatelJ. PatocC. PatrignaniA. PaulC. J. PawleyA. PellegrinoJ. PengX. PengM. Pepe AltarelliS. PerazziniD. PereimaH. Pereira Da CostaM. Pereira MartinezA. Pereiro CastroC. PerezP. PerretA. PerrevoortA. PerroM. J. PetersK. PetridisA. PetroliniS. PezzuloJ. P. PfallerH. PhamL. PicaM. PicciniL. PiccoloB. PietrzykG. PietrzykR. N. PilatoD. PinciF. PisaniM. PizzichemiV. M. PlacintaM. Plo CasasusT. PoeschlF. PolciM. Poli LenerA. PoluektovN. PolukhinaI. PolyakovE. PolycarpoS. PonceD. PopovK. PoppS. PoslavskiiK. PrasanthC. ProuveD. ProvenzanoV. PugatchA. Puicercus GomezG. PunziJ. R. PybusQ. Q. QianW. QianN. QinR. QuaglianiR. I. Rabadan TrejoR. RaczJ. H. RademackerM. RamaM. Ramírez GarcíaV. Ramos De OliveiraM. Ramos PernasM. S. RangelF. RatnikovG. RavenM. Rebollo De MiguelF. RediJ. ReichF. ReissZ. RenP. K. ResmiM. Ribalda GalvezR. RibattiG. RicartD. RiccardiS. RicciardiK. RichardsonM. Richardson-SlipperF. RiehnK. RinnertP. RobbeG. RobertsonE. RodriguesA. Rodriguez AlvarezE. Rodriguez FernandezJ. A. Rodriguez LopezE. Rodriguez RodriguezJ. RoenschA. RogachevA. RogovskiyD. L. RolfP. RoloffV. RomanovskiyA. Romero VidalG. RomoliniF. RonchettiT. RongM. RotondoM. S. RudolphM. Ruiz DiazR. A. Ruiz FernandezJ. Ruiz VidalJ. J. Saavedra-AriasJ. J. Saborido SilvaS. E. R. Sacha Emile R.N. SagidovaD. SahooN. SahooB. SaittaM. SalomoniI. SanderswoodR. SantacesariaC. Santamarina RiosM. SantimariaL. SantoroE. SantovettiA. SaputiD. SaraninA. SarnatskiyG. SarpisM. SarpisC. SatrianoA. SattaM. SaurD. SavrinaH. SazakF. SborzacchiA. ScarabottoS. SchaelS. ScherlM. SchillerH. SchindlerM. SchmellingB. SchmidtN. SchmidtS. SchmittH. SchmitzO. SchneiderA. SchopperN. SchulteM. H. SchuneG. SchweringB. SciasciaA. SciuccatiG. ScrivenI. SegalS. SellamA. SemennikovT. SengerM. Senghi SoaresA. SergiN. SerraL. SestiniB. Sevilla SanjuanY. ShangD. M. ShangaseM. ShapkinR. S. SharmaI. ShchemerovL. ShchutskaT. ShearsL. ShekhtmanZ. ShenS. ShengV. ShevchenkoB. ShiJ. ShiQ. ShiW. S. ShiY. ShimizuE. ShmaninR. ShorkinR. Silva CoutinhoG. SimiS. SimoneM. SinghaI. SiralN. SkidmoreT. SkwarnickiM. W. SlaterE. SmithM. SmithL. Soares LavraM. D. SokoloffF. J. P. SolerA. SolominA. SolovevK. SolovievaN. S. SommerfeldR. SongY. SongY. SongY. S. SongF. L. Souza De AlmeidaB. Souza De PaulaK. M. SowaE. Spadaro NorellaE. SpedicatoJ. G. SpeerP. SpradlinF. StagniM. StahlS. StahlS. StanislausM. StefaniakO. SteinkampD. StrekalinaY. SuF. SuljikJ. SunJ. SunL. SunD. SundfeldW. SutcliffeP. SvihraV. SvintozelskyiK. SwientekF. SwystunA. SzabelskiT. SzumlakY. TanY. TangY. T. TangM. D. TatJ. A. Teijeiro JimenezA. TerentevF. TerzuoliF. TeubertE. ThomasD. J. D. ThompsonA. R. Thomson-StrongH. TilquinV. TisserandS. T'JampensM. TobinT. T. TodorovL. TomassettiG. TonaniX. TongT. TorkL. ToscanoD. Y. TouC. TripplG. TuciN. TuningL. H. UeckerA. UklejaD. J. UnverzagtA. UpadhyayB. UrbachA. UsachovA. UstyuzhaninU. UwerV. VagnoniA. VaitkeviciusV. Valcarce CadenasG. ValentiN. Valls CanudasJ. van EldikH. Van HeckeE. van HerwijnenC. B. Van HulseR. Van LaakM. van VeghelG. VasquezR. Vazquez GomezP. Vazquez RegueiroC. Vázquez SierraS. VecchiJ. Velilla SernaJ. J. VelthuisM. VeltriA. VenkateswaranM. VerdogliaM. VesterinenW. VetensD. Vico BenetP. Vidrier VillalbaM. Vieites DiazX. Vilasis-CardonaE. Vilella FiguerasA. VillaP. VincentB. VivacquaF. C. VolleD. vom BruchN. VoropaevK. VosC. VrahasJ. WagnerJ. WalshE. J. WaltonG. WanA. WangB. WangC. WangG. WangH. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangM. WangN. W. WangR. WangX. WangX. WangX. W. WangY. WangY. WangY. H. WangZ. WangZ. WangJ. A. WardM. WaterlaatN. K. WatsonD. WebsdaleY. WeiZ. WeidaJ. WendelB. D. C. WesthenryC. WhiteM. WhiteheadE. WhiterA. R. WiederholdD. WiednerM. A. WiegertjesC. WildG. WilkinsonM. K. WilkinsonM. WilliamsM. J. WilliamsM. R. J. WilliamsR. WilliamsS. WilliamsZ. WilliamsF. F. WilsonM. WinnW. WislickiM. WitekL. WitolaT. WolfE. WoodG. WormserS. A. WottonH. WuJ. WuX. WuY. WuZ. WuK. WyllieS. XianZ. XiangY. XieT. X. XingA. XuL. XuM. XuZ. XuZ. XuZ. XuS. YadavK. YangX. YangY. YangY. YangZ. YangH. YeungH. YinX. YinC. Y. YuJ. YuX. YuanY YuanJ. A. Zamora SaaM. ZavertyaevM. ZdybalF. ZenesiniC. ZengM. ZengC. ZhangD. ZhangJ. ZhangL. ZhangR. ZhangS. ZhangS. L. ZhangY. ZhangY. Z. ZhangZ. ZhangY. ZhaoA. ZhelezovS. Z. ZhengX. Z. ZhengY. ZhengT. ZhouX. ZhouV. ZhovkovskaL. Z. ZhuX. ZhuX. ZhuY. ZhuV. ZhukovJ. ZhuoD. ZulianiG. Zunica10.1103/g8fs-djythttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27970v1$b \to c$ semileptonic sum rule: orbitally excited hadrons2026-04-30T15:02:35ZWe study semileptonic sum rules for $b \to c τ\overlineν$ transitions involving orbitally excited charm hadrons. Starting from the amplitude-level relation implied by the heavy quark symmetry, we construct sum rules relating these decays. We then examine deviations from the small-velocity limit. Our numerical analysis shows that the deviations generally increase once excited hadrons are involved, with tensor contributions often inducing sizable effects. At present, however, the relevant form factors are not yet sufficiently constrained. Further improvements in the hadronic inputs are essential for these sum rules to yield robust predictions for the corresponding lepton-universality ratios.2026-04-30T15:02:35Z23 pages, 6 figures, 6 tablesMotoi EndoSyuhei IguroSatoshi Mishimahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23159v2Muonphilic asymmetric dark matter at a future muon collider2026-04-30T14:57:10ZWe explore phenomenological constraints on, and future muon collider sensitivities to, the parameter spaces of various muonphilic portals to fermionic asymmetric dark matter (ADM). Both WEFT-level dimension-6 effective operators and two UV models based on gauged $L_μ- L_τ$ are considered. One of the latter features a vector coupling to the dark matter and the other an axial vector coupling. The ADM criterion that at least $99\%$ of the dark matter relic density is asymmetric is also imposed. We identify which of these scenarios are currently allowed by direct detection and collider constraints, and then determine how much more of the parameter space could be probed by 3 and 10 TeV muon colliders with 1 ab$^{-1}$ of data. For the UV models, the constraints from $g-2$ of the muon are included. The future sensitivity curves due to neutron star heating considerations are also depicted. We present results for both the few-GeV dark matter mass regime motivated by ADM approaches to the $Ω_b \simeq Ω_\text{DM}/5$ coincidence problem, and for larger masses in the context of more general ADM.2025-12-29T02:46:21Z28 pages, 9 figures, matches the published versionArnab RoyRaymond R. Volkas