https://arxiv.org/api/y3dfJT82+uE15JktFO7toO/MN7k 2026-06-15T01:20:28Z 60396 675 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01363v1 2026-05-02T10:16:13Z

Flavor-tagging calibrations are often provided either as scale factors measured at a finite set of working points or as binned corrections to a chosen one-dimensional discriminant. However, this approach falls short of providing continuous, event-level calibration across the full multicomponent outputs of modern taggers. This limitation leads to information loss in analyses that demand high-performance flavor tagging, restricting analyses to a limited set of predefined variables. In this work, we propose a geometry-aware framework that formulates flavor-tagger calibration as an optimal transport problem on the probability simplex. The transport maps are parameterized and trained in the isometric log-ratio coordinate system. Because the quadratic Euclidean cost of Brenier transport in this coordinate system is equivalent to the Aitchison distance on the simplex, the learned map induces a minimal deformation under the Aitchison geometry. Furthermore, we extract flavor-conditional target distributions directly from control-region data using an expectation-maximization (EM) technique that simultaneously fits multiple control regions, models each flavor component with a normalizing flow, and estimates the regional mixture fractions. The extracted targets are subsequently used to learn flavor-factorized transport maps. Because the joint estimation of mixture fractions and flexible component densities admits weakly constrained directions, we further introduce a linearized feedback-operator analysis that propagates the fitted composition covariance into the extracted component densities, separating data-constrained modes from those dominated by the composition prior. The simulation-based closure study demonstrates improved closure in dedicated control regions and in independent validation mixtures.

2026-05-02T10:16:13Z 32 Pages, 12 Figures Yeonjoon Kim Un-ki Yang http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12253v2 2026-05-02T10:15:38Z

A global fit for $α_s(m_Z)$ is performed on available $e^+e^-$ data for the heavy jet mass distribution. The state-of-the-art theory prediction includes $\mathcal{O}(α_s^3)$ fixed-order results, N$^3$LL$^\prime$ dijet resummation, N$^2$LL Sudakov shoulder resummation, and a first-principles treatment of power corrections in the dijet region. Theoretical correlations are incorporated through a flat random-scan covariance matrix. The global fit results in $0.1148^{+ 0.0015}_{-0.0022}$, compatible with similar determinations from thrust and $C$-parameter. Dijet resummation is essential for a robust fit, as it engenders insensitivity to the fit-range lower cutoff; without resummation the fit-range sensitivity is overwhelming. In addition, we find evidence for a negative power correction in the trijet region if and only if Sudakov shoulder resummation is included.

2025-02-17T19:00:13Z 4 pages + supplemental material, 8 figures, 3 tables Miguel A. Benitez Arindam Bhattacharya Andre H. Hoang Vicent Mateu Matthew D. Schwartz Iain W. Stewart Xiaoyuan Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13456v2 2026-05-02T00:02:26Z

Recently, many new excited states of heavy mesons have been discovered in recent experiments, including radially excited states. The production processes of these states from the $B_{(s)}$ meson have drawn significant interest. In this paper, we use the covariant light-front approach to study the nonleptonic $B_{(s)}$ meson decays to the first radially excited states $D_{(s)}(2S)$ and $D^{*}_{(s)}(2S)$. Our results reveal that many channels exhibit large branching ratios in the range $10^{-5}\sim 10^{-4}$, even up to $10^{-3}$ for individual channels, which are detectable by current experiments. Our predictions for the decays $B_{(s)}\to D^{(*)}_{(s)}(2S)(π,ρ,K^{(*)})$ are larger than those given by the Bethe-Salpeter (BS) equation method, but agree well with the relativistic quark mode (RQM) and the relativistic independent quark model (RIQM) calculations. For comparison, we also present the branching ratios of the decays $B_{(s)}\to D^{(*)}_{(s)}(1S)(π,ρ,K^{(*)})$, which are comparable with other theoretical results and the data. Although the branching ratios of the decays $B_{(s)} \to D^{*}_{(s)}(1S)(ρ,K^*)$ are much larger than those of the decays $B_{(s)} \to D^{*}_{(s)}(2S)(ρ,K^*)$, the polarization properties between them are similar, that is, the longitudinal polarization fractions are dominant and can amount roughly to $90\%$.

2025-11-17T14:59:50Z 25 page, 3 figures Phys.Rev.D 113, 033008 (2026) Zhi-Jie Sun Yong-Jin Sun Zhi-Qing Zhang You-Ya Yang Si-Yang Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17192v3 2026-05-01T19:14:09Z

The next generation of rare-event searches, such as those aimed at determining the nature of particle dark matter or in measuring fundamental neutrino properties, will benefit from particle detectors with thresholds at the meV scale, 100-1000x lower than currently available. Quantum parity detectors (QPDs) are a class of proposed quantum devices, extending recent work on superconducting qubit sensors, that exploit the fingerprints of single quasiparticle tunneling across a coherent weak-link as their detection concept. As envisioned, phonons generated by particle interactions within a crystalline substrate cause an eventual quasiparticle cascade within a surface-patterned superconducting qubit element. This process alters the fundamental charge parity of the device in a binary manner, which can be used to deduce the initial properties of the energy deposition. This work lays out multiple resonator coupled readout schemes depending on qubit architecture, provides an analytic formulation for reconstructing sensor energies, and details strategies for multiplexing large arrays of sensors. We further compute the sensitivity of QPDs and detail an R&D pathway to demonstrating sub-eV energy deposit thresholds.

2024-05-27T14:17:33Z 20 pages, 14 figures, 5 appendices APS Open Sci. 1 (2026), 000013 Karthik Ramanathan Brandon J. Sandoval John E. Parker Lalit M. Joshi Andrew D. Beyer Pierre M. Echternach Serge Rosenblum Sunil R. Golwala 10.1103/kqd2-spb1 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00989v1 2026-05-01T18:00:01Z

We study CP violation induced by neutral kaon mixing in $a_{CP}(D^0 \rightarrow K_S K_S)$. We show that the contribution from neutral kaon mixing arises only in connection with second-order weak interactions in $D$ decays. We estimate this effect to be at the $10^{-6}$ level, and thus negligible compared to current experimental sensitivity and to the expected contribution from CP violation in the charm sector.

2026-05-01T18:00:01Z 14 pages, 1 figure Yuval Grossman Guglielmo Papiri Stefan Schacht http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07855v3 2026-05-01T16:22:50Z

Minicharged particles (mCPs), hypothetical free particles with effective electric charges much smaller than the elementary charge, $e$, offer a valuable probe of dark sectors and fundamental physics through several clear experimental signatures. Various models of physics beyond the Standard Model predict such particles, the existence of which could help elucidate the ongoing mysteries regarding electric charge quantization and the nature of dark matter. Moreover, a hypothetical scenario involving a small minicharged subcomponent of dark matter has recently been demonstrated as a viable explanation of the anomaly in the 21 cm hydrogen absorption signal reported by the EDGES collaboration. Although several decades of indirect observations and direct experimental searches for mCPs at particle accelerators have led to severe constraints, a substantial window of the mCP mass$\unicode{x2013}$mixing parameter space remains unexplored at the energy frontier accessible to current state-of-the-art accelerators, such as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Consequently, mCPs have remained topical over the years, and new experimental searches at accelerators have been gaining interest. In this article, we review the theoretical frameworks in which mCPs emerge and their phenomenological implications, the current direct and indirect constraints on mCPs, and the present state of the ongoing and upcoming searches for mCPs at particle accelerators.

2023-07-15T17:26:04Z 22 pages, 3 figures. Paper accepted for publication in the European Physical Journal ST issue titled The MoEDAL-MAPP Experiment $\unicode{x2014}$ The LHC's First Dedicated Search Experiment for BSM Physics Marc de Montigny Pierre-Philippe A. Ouimet James Pinfold Ameir Shaa Michael Staelens 10.1140/epjs/s11734-026-02362-3 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00748v1 2026-05-01T15:56:00Z

We present a comprehensive theoretical study of the masses of possible baryonic and mesonic configurations containing a single top quark. Our analysis includes the baryons $Λ_t$, $Ξ_t$, $Σ_t$, $Ξ'_t$, $Ω_t$, $Ω_{tcc}$, and $Ω_{tbb}$, together with the pseudoscalar and vector mesons $T_{t\bar n}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, $T_{t\bar n}^{\mathrm{V}}$, $T_{t\bar s}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, $T_{t\bar s}^{\mathrm{V}}$, $T_{t\bar c}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, $T_{t\bar c}^{\mathrm{V}}$, $T_{t\bar b}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, and $T_{t\bar b}^{\mathrm{V}}$. Motivated in part by recent experimental indications of a pseudoscalar enhancement near the $t\bar t$ threshold reported by the CMS and ATLAS collaborations, this study is carried out within the framework of two-point QCD sum rules to determine the corresponding ground-state masses by including perturbative contributions and nonperturbative condensates up to dimension eight. For several channels, including the $Λ_t$, $Ξ_t$, $Σ_t$, $T_{t\bar b}^{\mathrm{Ps}}$, and $T_{t\bar b}^{\mathrm{V}}$ states, the extracted central masses lie slightly below the corresponding sums of constituent quark masses, which may indicate nontrivial binding dynamics or near-threshold multiquark configurations within the uncertainties of the method. Moreover, when the full theoretical uncertainties are taken into account in a conservative manner, a larger subset of the investigated states exhibits a consistent tendency toward weak binding behavior, suggesting that the possibility of loosely bound configurations cannot be excluded for most of the considered baryonic and mesonic channels. These results provide useful first-principles theoretical benchmarks for possible top-containing hadronic systems, which may support future searches at the LHC, along with sensitivity analyses for next-generation facilities such as the FCC.

2026-05-01T15:56:00Z 12 Pages, 1 Figure and 3 Tables Z. Rajabi Najjar M. Ahmadi K. Azizi http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01411v2 2026-05-01T15:42:18Z

Fine-tuning and naturalness, the sensitivity of low-energy observables to small changes in the fundamental parameters of a theory, are cornerstones of physics beyond the Standard Model. We propose a new measure of fine-tuning based on information theory. To each point in parameter space we associate a probability distribution over observables. Divergence measures encode the sensitivity of observables to model parameters and determine a Riemannian metric on parameter space. By Chentsov's theorem, the physically motivated metric is the Fisher information metric, up to scaling. We propose a rescaled fine-tuning matrix $\mathcal{F}_{ij}$ derived from the Fisher information matrix, whose non-zero eigenvalues serve as our measure of fine-tuning. When the number of observables exceeds the number of parameters, $\mathcal{F}_{ij}$ admits a natural geometric interpretation as the pullback of the Euclidean metric from observable space to the submanifold of admissible predictions, with large eigenvalues corresponding to highly stretched directions and indicative of fine-tuning. Our measure reproduces the familiar Barbieri--Giudice criterion as a special case, while generalising it to multiple correlated parameters. We illustrate its behaviour on dimensional transmutation, the Wilson--Fisher fixed point, a simple model of the hierarchy problem, and the electron Yukawa coupling, finding agreement with physical intuition in each case.

2026-03-02T03:28:58Z 8 pages, 2 figures James Halverson Thomas R. Harvey Michael Nee http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04858v2 2026-05-01T15:29:46Z

Current multi-tonne-scale dark matter (DM) detectors are largely incapable of detecting light dark matter from the Galactic halo due to the energy threshold limitations of their recoil measurements. However, primordial black holes (PBHs) can evaporate via Hawking radiation to particles whose energies are set by the black hole temperature. Consequently, weakly interacting light dark matter (or dark radiation) particles produced in this manner can reach the Earth with sufficient flux and kinetic energy above the experimental thresholds. This opens up a novel avenue to probe the light dark sector in terrestrial experiments. In this work, we explore this possibility by considering fermionic DM produced through PBH evaporation and investigating its electron recoil signatures in direct detection experiments. We analyze both energy independent (constant) and energy dependent (scalar and vector mediated) DM-electron interactions, highlighting the strong dependence of the recoil spectra on the underlying Lorentz structure of the interaction. In addition, we also account for the attenuation effects due to the loss of kinetic energy while DM traverses through Earth's crust, which can significantly modify the incoming DM flux. Incorporating these effects carefully, we place constraints on light DM using the electron recoil data from XENONnT, LZ, and PandaX-4T. Finally, we also discuss the detection prospects of such dark matter in current and future generation neutrino detectors, such as Super-Kamiokande and Hyper-Kamiokande.

2026-02-04T18:43:59Z 35 pages, 17 figures, v2: attenuation ceiling for neutrino detectors included, results unchanged, accepted in JCAP Sk Jeesun Anirban Majumdar Rahul Srivastava http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26784v2 2026-05-01T13:56:24Z

The first evidence for the decay $B^+\toπ^+ e^+ e^-$ is reported using proton-proton collision data recorded by the LHCb experiment at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8 and 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb$^{-1}$. A signal excess with a significance of 3.2$σ$ is observed and the branching fraction is measured to be $\cal{BR}(B^+\toπ^+ e^+ e^-) = (2.4\,{}^{+0.9}_{-0.8} \,{}^{+0.4}_{-0.2}) \times 10^{-8}$, where the first set of uncertainties is statistical and the second is systematic. The result is consistent with the Standard Model expectation.

2026-04-29T15:14:41Z All figures and tables, along with any supplementary material and additional information, are available at https://lbfence.cern.ch/alcm/public/analysis/full-details/4635 (LHCb public pages) LHCb collaboration R. Aaij A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb C. Abellan Beteta F. Abudinén T. Ackernley A. A. Adefisoye B. Adeva M. Adinolfi P. Adlarson C. Agapopoulou C. A. Aidala Z. Ajaltouni S. Akar K. Akiba M. Akthar P. Albicocco J. Albrecht R. Aleksiejunas F. Alessio P. Alvarez Cartelle R. Amalric S. Amato J. L. Amey Y. Amhis L. An L. Anderlini M. Andersson P. Andreola M. Andreotti S. Andres Estrada A. Anelli D. Ao C. Arata F. Archilli Z. Areg M. Argenton S. Arguedas Cuendis L. Arnone A. Artamonov M. Artuso E. Aslanides R. Ataíde Da Silva M. Atzeni B. Audurier J. A. Authier D. Bacher I. Bachiller Perea S. Bachmann M. Bachmayer J. J. Back P. Baladron Rodriguez V. Balagura A. Balboni W. Baldini Z. Baldwin L. Balzani H. Bao J. Baptista de Souza Leite C. Barbero Pretel M. Barbetti I. R. Barbosa R. J. Barlow M. Barnyakov S. Barsuk W. Barter J. Bartz S. Bashir B. Batsukh P. B. Battista A. Bay A. Beck M. Becker F. Bedeschi I. B. Bediaga N. A. Behling S. Belin A. Bellavista K. Belous I. Belov I. Belyaev G. Benane G. Bencivenni E. Ben-Haim A. Berezhnoy R. Bernet S. Bernet Andres A. Bertolin F. Betti J. Bex O. Bezshyyko S. Bhattacharya M. S. Bieker N. V. Biesuz A. Biolchini M. Birch F. C. R. Bishop A. Bitadze A. Bizzeti T. Blake F. Blanc J. E. Blank S. Blusk V. Bocharnikov J. A. Boelhauve O. Boente Garcia T. Boettcher A. Bohare A. Boldyrev C. Bolognani R. Bolzonella R. B. Bonacci N. Bondar A. Bordelius F. Borgato S. Borghi M. Borsato J. T. Borsuk E. Bottalico S. A. Bouchiba M. Bovill T. J. V. Bowcock A. Boyer C. Bozzi J. D. Brandenburg A. Brea Rodriguez N. Breer J. Brodzicka J. Brown D. Brundu E. Buchanan M. Burgos Marcos A. T. Burke C. Burr C. Buti J. S. Butter J. Buytaert W. Byczynski S. Cadeddu H. Cai Y. Cai A. Caillet R. Calabrese S. Calderon Ramirez L. Calefice M. Calvi M. Calvo Gomez P. Camargo Magalhaes J. I. Cambon Bouzas P. Campana A. F. Campoverde Quezada Y. Cao S. Capelli M. Caporale L. Capriotti R. Caravaca-Mora A. Carbone L. Carcedo Salgado R. Cardinale A. Cardini P. Carniti L. Carus A. Casais Vidal R. Caspary G. Casse M. Cattaneo G. Cavallero V. Cavallini S. Celani I. Celestino S. Cesare A. J. Chadwick I. Chahrour H. Chang M. Charles Ph. Charpentier E. Chatzianagnostou R. Cheaib M. Chefdeville C. Chen J. Chen S. Chen Z. Chen A. Chen Hu M. Cherif A. Chernov S. Chernyshenko X. Chiotopoulos V. Chobanova M. Chrzaszcz A. Chubykin V. Chulikov P. Ciambrone X. Cid Vidal G. Ciezarek P. Cifra P. E. L. Clarke M. Clemencic H. V. Cliff J. Closier C. Cocha Toapaxi V. Coco J. Cogan E. Cogneras L. Cojocariu S. Collaviti P. Collins T. Colombo M. Colonna A. Comerma-Montells L. Congedo J. Connaughton A. Contu N. Cooke G. Cordova C. Coronel I. Corredoira A. Correia G. Corti J. Cottee Meldrum B. Couturier D. C. Craik M. Cruz Torres M. Cubero Campos E. Curras Rivera R. Currie C. L. Da Silva S. Dadabaev X. Dai E. Dall'Occo J. Dalseno C. D'Ambrosio J. Daniel G. Darze A. Davidson J. E. Davies O. De Aguiar Francisco C. De Angelis F. De Benedetti J. de Boer K. De Bruyn S. De Capua M. De Cian U. De Freitas Carneiro Da Graca E. De Lucia J. M. De Miranda L. De Paula M. De Serio P. De Simone F. De Vellis J. A. de Vries F. Debernardis D. Decamp S. Dekkers L. Del Buono B. Delaney J. Deng V. Denysenko O. Deschamps F. Dettori B. Dey P. Di Nezza I. Diachkov S. Didenko S. Ding Y. Ding L. Dittmann V. Dobishuk A. D. Docheva A. Doheny C. Dong A. M. Donohoe F. Dordei A. C. dos Reis A. D. Dowling L. Dreyfus W. Duan P. Duda L. Dufour V. Duk P. Durante M. M. Duras J. M. Durham O. D. Durmus A. Dziurda A. Dzyuba S. Easo E. Eckstein U. Egede A. Egorychev V. Egorychev S. Eisenhardt E. Ejopu L. Eklund M. Elashri D. Elizondo Blanco J. Ellbracht S. Ely A. Ene J. Eschle T. Evans F. Fabiano S. Faghih L. N. Falcao B. Fang R. Fantechi L. Fantini M. Faria K. Farmer F. Fassin D. Fazzini L. Felkowski C. Feng M. Feng A. Fernandez Casani M. Fernandez Gomez A. D. Fernez F. Ferrari F. Ferreira Rodrigues M. Ferrillo M. Ferro-Luzzi S. Filippov R. A. Fini M. Fiorini M. Firlej K. L. Fischer D. S. Fitzgerald C. Fitzpatrick T. Fiutowski F. Fleuret A. Fomin M. Fontana L. A. Foreman R. Forty D. Foulds-Holt V. Franco Lima M. Franco Sevilla M. Frank E. Franzoso G. Frau C. Frei D. A. Friday J. Fu Q. Führing T. Fulghesu G. Galati M. D. Galati A. Gallas Torreira D. Galli S. Gambetta M. Gandelman P. Gandini B. Ganie H. Gao R. Gao T. Q. Gao Y. Gao Y. Gao Y. Gao L. M. Garcia Martin P. Garcia Moreno J. García Pardiñas P. Gardner L. Garrido C. Gaspar A. Gavrikov L. L. Gerken E. Gersabeck M. Gersabeck T. Gershon S. Ghizzo Z. Ghorbanimoghaddam F. I. Giasemis V. Gibson H. K. Giemza A. L. Gilman M. Giovannetti A. Gioventù L. Girardey M. A. Giza F. C. Glaser V. V. Gligorov C. Göbel L. Golinka-Bezshyyko E. Golobardes D. Golubkov A. Golutvin S. Gomez Fernandez W. Gomulka F. Goncalves Abrantes I. Gonçales Vaz M. Goncerz G. Gong J. A. Gooding I. V. Gorelov C. Gotti E. Govorkova J. P. Grabowski L. A. Granado Cardoso E. Graugés E. Graverini L. Grazette G. Graziani A. T. Grecu N. A. Grieser L. Grillo S. Gromov C. Gu M. Guarise L. Guerry A. -K. Guseinov E. Gushchin Y. Guz T. Gys K. Habermann T. Hadavizadeh C. Hadjivasiliou G. Haefeli C. Haen S. Haken G. Hallett P. M. Hamilton J. Hammerich Q. Han X. Han S. Hansmann-Menzemer L. Hao N. Harnew T. J. Harris M. Hartmann S. Hashmi J. He N. Heatley A. Hedes F. Hemmer C. Henderson R. Henderson R. D. L. Henderson A. M. Hennequin K. Hennessy L. Henry J. Herd P. Herrero Gascon J. Heuel A. Heyn A. Hicheur G. Hijano Mendizabal J. Horswill R. Hou Y. Hou D. C. Houston N. Howarth W. Hu X. Hu W. Hulsbergen R. J. Hunter M. Hushchyn D. Hutchcroft M. Idzik D. Ilin P. Ilten A. Iniukhin A. Iohner A. Ishteev K. Ivshin H. Jage S. J. Jaimes Elles S. Jakobsen T. Jakoubek E. Jans B. K. Jashal A. Jawahery C. Jayaweera V. Jevtic Z. Jia E. Jiang X. Jiang Y. Jiang Y. J. Jiang E. Jimenez Moya N. Jindal M. John A. John Rubesh Rajan D. Johnson C. R. Jones S. Joshi B. Jost J. Juan Castella N. Jurik I. Juszczak K. Kalecinska D. Kaminaris S. Kandybei M. Kane Y. Kang C. Kar M. Karacson A. Kauniskangas J. W. Kautz M. K. Kazanecki F. Keizer M. Kenzie T. Ketel B. Khanji A. Kharisova S. Kholodenko G. Khreich T. Kirn V. S. Kirsebom S. Klaver N. Kleijne A. Kleimenova D. K. Klekots K. Klimaszewski M. R. Kmiec T. Knospe R. Kolb S. Koliiev L. Kolk A. Konoplyannikov P. Kopciewicz P. Koppenburg A. Korchin M. Korolev I. Kostiuk O. Kot S. Kotriakhova E. Kowalczyk A. Kozachuk P. Kravchenko L. Kravchuk O. Kravcov M. Kreps P. Krokovny W. Krupa W. Krzemien O. Kshyvanskyi S. Kubis M. Kucharczyk V. Kudryavtsev E. Kulikova A. Kupsc V. Kushnir B. Kutsenko J. Kvapil I. Kyryllin D. Lacarrere P. Laguarta Gonzalez A. Lai A. Lampis D. Lancierini C. Landesa Gomez J. J. Lane G. Lanfranchi C. Langenbruch J. Langer T. Latham F. Lazzari C. Lazzeroni R. Le Gac H. Lee R. Lefèvre A. Leflat S. Legotin M. Lehuraux E. Lemos Cid O. Leroy T. Lesiak E. D. Lesser B. Leverington A. Li C. Li C. Li H. Li J. Li K. Li L. Li M. Li P. Li P. -R. Li Q. Li T. Li T. Li Y. Li Y. Li Y. Li Z. Lian Q. Liang X. Liang Z. Liang S. Libralon A. Lightbody C. Lin T. Lin R. Lindner H. Linton R. Litvinov D. Liu F. L. Liu G. Liu K. Liu S. Liu W. Liu Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. L. Liu G. Loachamin Ordonez I. Lobo A. Lobo Salvia A. Loi T. Long F. C. L. Lopes J. H. Lopes A. Lopez Huertas C. Lopez Iribarnegaray S. López Soliño Q. Lu C. Lucarelli D. Lucchesi M. Lucio Martinez Y. Luo A. Lupato E. Luppi K. Lynch S. Lyu X. -R. Lyu G. M. Ma H. Ma S. Maccolini F. Machefert F. Maciuc B. Mack I. Mackay L. M. Mackey L. R. Madhan Mohan M. J. Madurai D. Magdalinski D. Maisuzenko J. J. Malczewski S. Malde L. Malentacca A. Malinin T. Maltsev G. Manca G. Mancinelli C. Mancuso R. Manera Escalero F. M. Manganella D. Manuzzi D. Marangotto J. F. Marchand R. Marchevski U. Marconi E. Mariani S. Mariani C. Marin Benito J. Marks A. M. Marshall L. Martel G. Martelli G. Martellotti L. Martinazzoli M. Martinelli D. Martinez Gomez D. Martinez Santos F. Martinez Vidal A. Martorell i Granollers A. Massafferri R. Matev A. Mathad V. Matiunin C. Matteuzzi K. R. Mattioli A. Mauri E. Maurice J. Mauricio P. Mayencourt J. Mazorra de Cos M. Mazurek M. McCann N. T. McHugh A. McNab R. McNulty B. Meadows D. Melnychuk D. Mendoza Granada P. Menendez Valdes Perez F. M. Meng M. Merk A. Merli L. Meyer Garcia D. Miao H. Miao M. Mikhasenko D. A. Milanes A. Minotti E. Minucci T. Miralles B. Mitreska D. S. Mitzel R. Mocanu A. Modak L. Moeser R. D. Moise E. F. Molina Cardenas T. Mombächer M. Monk T. Monnard S. Monteil A. Morcillo Gomez G. Morello M. J. Morello M. P. Morgenthaler A. Moro J. Moron W. Morren A. B. Morris A. G. Morris R. Mountain Z. Mu E. Muhammad F. Muheim M. Mulder K. Müller F. Muñoz-Rojas R. Murta V. Mytrochenko P. Naik T. Nakada R. Nandakumar T. Nanut G. Napoletano I. Nasteva M. Needham E. Nekrasova N. Neri S. Neubert N. Neufeld P. Neustroev J. Nicolini D. Nicotra E. M. Niel N. Nikitin L. Nisi Q. Niu B. K. Njoki P. Nogarolli P. Nogga C. Normand J. Novoa Fernandez G. Nowak C. Nunez H. N. Nur A. Oblakowska-Mucha V. Obraztsov T. Oeser A. Okhotnikov O. Okhrimenko R. Oldeman F. Oliva E. Olivart Pino M. Olocco R. H. O'Neil J. S. Ordonez Soto D. Osthues J. M. Otalora Goicochea P. Owen A. Oyanguren O. Ozcelik F. Paciolla A. Padee K. O. Padeken B. Pagare T. Pajero A. Palano L. Palini M. Palutan C. Pan X. Pan S. Panebianco S. Paniskaki G. Panshin L. Paolucci A. Papanestis M. Pappagallo L. L. Pappalardo C. Pappenheimer C. Parkes D. Parmar G. Passaleva D. Passaro A. Pastore M. Patel J. Patoc C. Patrignani A. Paul C. J. Pawley A. Pellegrino J. Peng X. Peng M. Pepe Altarelli S. Perazzini D. Pereima H. Pereira Da Costa M. Pereira Martinez A. Pereiro Castro C. Perez P. Perret A. Perrevoort A. Perro M. J. Peters K. Petridis A. Petrolini S. Pezzulo J. P. Pfaller H. Pham L. Pica M. Piccini L. Piccolo B. Pietrzyk G. Pietrzyk R. N. Pilato D. Pinci F. Pisani M. Pizzichemi V. M. Placinta M. Plo Casasus T. Poeschl F. Polci M. Poli Lener A. Poluektov N. Polukhina I. Polyakov E. Polycarpo S. Ponce D. Popov K. Popp S. Poslavskii K. Prasanth C. Prouve D. Provenzano V. Pugatch A. Puicercus Gomez G. Punzi J. R. Pybus Q. Qian W. Qian N. Qin R. Quagliani R. I. Rabadan Trejo R. Racz J. H. Rademacker M. Rama M. Ramírez García V. Ramos De Oliveira M. Ramos Pernas M. S. Rangel F. Ratnikov G. Raven M. Rebollo De Miguel F. Redi J. Reich F. Reiss Z. Ren P. K. Resmi M. Ribalda Galvez R. Ribatti G. Ricart D. Riccardi S. Ricciardi K. Richardson M. Richardson-Slipper F. Riehn K. Rinnert P. Robbe G. Robertson E. Rodrigues A. Rodriguez Alvarez E. Rodriguez Fernandez J. A. Rodriguez Lopez E. Rodriguez Rodriguez J. Roensch A. Rogachev A. Rogovskiy D. L. Rolf P. Roloff V. Romanovskiy A. Romero Vidal G. Romolini F. Ronchetti T. Rong M. Rotondo S. R. Roy M. S. Rudolph M. Ruiz Diaz R. A. Ruiz Fernandez J. Ruiz Vidal J. J. Saavedra-Arias J. J. Saborido Silva S. E. R. Sacha Emile R. N. Sagidova D. Sahoo N. Sahoo B. Saitta M. Salomoni I. Sanderswood R. Santacesaria C. Santamarina Rios M. Santimaria L. Santoro E. Santovetti A. Saputi D. Saranin A. Sarnatskiy G. Sarpis M. Sarpis C. Satriano A. Satta M. Saur D. Savrina H. Sazak F. Sborzacchi A. Scarabotto S. Schael S. Scherl M. Schiller H. Schindler M. Schmelling B. Schmidt N. Schmidt S. Schmitt H. Schmitz O. Schneider A. Schopper N. Schulte M. H. Schune G. Schwering B. Sciascia A. Sciuccati G. Scriven I. Segal S. Sellam A. Semennikov T. Senger M. Senghi Soares A. Sergi N. Serra L. Sestini A. Seuthe B. Sevilla Sanjuan Y. Shang D. M. Shangase M. Shapkin R. S. Sharma I. Shchemerov L. Shchutska T. Shears L. Shekhtman J. Shen Z. Shen S. Sheng V. Shevchenko B. Shi Q. Shi W. S. Shi Y. Shimizu E. Shmanin R. Shorkin J. D. Shupperd R. Silva Coutinho G. Simi S. Simone M. Singha N. Skidmore T. Skwarnicki M. W. Slater E. Smith M. Smith L. Soares Lavra M. D. Sokoloff F. J. P. Soler A. Solomin A. Solovev K. Solovieva N. S. Sommerfeld R. Song Y. Song Y. Song Y. S. Song F. L. Souza De Almeida B. Souza De Paula K. M. Sowa E. Spadaro Norella E. Spedicato J. G. Speer P. Spradlin F. Stagni M. Stahl S. Stahl S. Stanislaus M. Stefaniak O. Steinkamp D. Strekalina Y. Su F. Suljik J. Sun J. Sun L. Sun D. Sundfeld W. Sutcliffe P. Svihra V. Svintozelskyi K. Swientek F. Swystun A. Szabelski T. Szumlak Y. Tan Y. Tang Y. T. Tang M. D. Tat J. A. Teijeiro Jimenez A. Terentev F. Terzuoli F. Teubert E. Thomas D. J. D. Thompson A. R. Thomson-Strong H. Tilquin V. Tisserand S. T'Jampens M. Tobin T. T. Todorov L. Tomassetti G. Tonani X. Tong T. Tork L. Toscano D. Y. Tou C. Trippl G. Tuci N. Tuning L. H. Uecker A. Ukleja D. J. Unverzagt A. Upadhyay B. Urbach A. Usachov A. Ustyuzhanin U. Uwer V. Vagnoni A. Vaitkevicius V. Valcarce Cadenas G. Valenti N. Valls Canudas J. van Eldik H. Van Hecke E. van Herwijnen C. B. Van Hulse R. Van Laak M. van Veghel G. Vasquez R. Vazquez Gomez P. Vazquez Regueiro C. Vázquez Sierra S. Vecchi J. Velilla Serna J. J. Velthuis M. Veltri A. Venkateswaran M. Verdoglia M. Vesterinen W. Vetens D. Vico Benet P. Vidrier Villalba M. Vieites Diaz X. Vilasis-Cardona E. Vilella Figueras A. Villa P. Vincent B. Vivacqua F. C. Volle D. vom Bruch N. Voropaev K. Vos C. Vrahas J. Wagner J. Walsh E. J. Walton G. Wan A. Wang B. Wang C. Wang G. Wang H. Wang J. Wang J. Wang J. Wang J. Wang M. Wang N. W. Wang R. Wang X. Wang X. Wang X. W. Wang Y. Wang Y. Wang Y. H. Wang Z. Wang Z. Wang J. A. Ward M. Waterlaat N. K. Watson D. Websdale Y. Wei Z. Weida J. Wendel B. D. C. Westhenry C. White M. Whitehead E. Whiter A. R. Wiederhold D. Wiedner M. A. Wiegertjes C. Wild G. Wilkinson M. K. Wilkinson M. Williams M. J. Williams M. R. J. Williams R. Williams S. Williams Z. Williams F. F. Wilson M. Winn W. Wislicki M. Witek L. Witola T. Wolf E. Wood G. Wormser S. A. Wotton H. Wu J. Wu X. Wu Y. Wu Z. Wu K. Wyllie S. Xian Z. Xiang Y. Xie T. X. Xing A. Xu L. Xu M. Xu Z. Xu Z. Xu Z. Xu S. Yadav K. Yang X. Yang Y. Yang Y. Yang Z. Yang V. Yeroshenko H. Yeung H. Yin X. Yin C. Y. Yu J. Yu X. Yuan Y Yuan J. A. Zamora Saa M. Zavertyaev M. Zdybal F. Zenesini C. Zeng M. Zeng C. Zhang D. Zhang J. Zhang L. Zhang R. Zhang S. Zhang S. L. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. Z. Zhang Z. Zhang Y. Zhao A. Zhelezov S. Z. Zheng X. Z. Zheng Y. Zheng T. Zhou X. Zhou Y. Zhou V. Zhovkovska L. Z. Zhu X. Zhu X. Zhu Y. Zhu V. Zhukov J. Zhuo D. Zuliani G. Zunica http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00666v1 2026-05-01T13:45:58Z

We present a comprehensive new global QCD analysis of unpolarized parton distribution functions (PDFs) based upon proton, deuteron and $A\!=\!3$ data, including the latest inclusive deep-inelastic scattering (DIS) measurements from Jefferson Lab at high Bjorken-$x$. Using the JAM Bayesian Monte Carlo framework, we systematically explore the stability of the PDFs with respect to variations in the cuts on the invariant mass $W$ of the DIS final state, the implementation of target mass and higher twist corrections, as well as on the nuclear wave functions for the $A\!=\!2$ and 3 data. We find the $u$ and $d$ quark PDFs (and the $d/u$ ratio) are relatively stable up to $x \approx 0.8$, and able to describe DIS data down to $W^2=3.5$ GeV$^2$ and $Q^2=m_c^2$. Within the collinear factorization framework, the fitted higher twist corrections to DIS are found to be positive, and largely isospin independent. The description of the nuclear data also requires nonzero isoscalar and isovector nucleon off-shell PDF contributions, which gives specific predictions for the ratio, $R_D$, of deuteron to isoscalar nucleon structure functions.

2026-05-01T13:45:58Z 35 pages, 10 figures C. Cocuzza W. Melnitchouk N. Sato A. W. Thomas http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19571v2 2026-05-01T13:26:33Z

Using $(2.712\pm0.014)\times10^{9}$ $ψ(3686)$ events collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII collider, we report an evidence of $Ξ^{0}$ transverse polarization with a significance of 4.4$σ$, a precise measurement of the branching fraction and the ratios between the $S$-wave and $D$-wave contributions of $ψ(3686)\toΞ^{0}\barΞ^{0}$. The weak decay parameters ($φ_{Ξ^0/\barΞ^{0}}$, $α_{Ξ^0/\barΞ^{0}}$) and the angular distribution ($α_ψ$) are also measured with higher precision compared to the previous measurements. Furthermore, two the $CP$ observables are also determined to be $A^{Ξ^0}_{CP} = -0.014 \pm 0.030 \pm 0.010$ and $Δφ^{Ξ^0}_{CP} = 0.000 \pm 0.028 \pm 0.003$~rad, which are still consistent with $CP$ conservation at 1$σ$ level under the current statistics.

2025-10-22T13:22:47Z 10 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables, consistent with the publication in Phys. Rev. D (Letter) 113, L091501 (2026) Phys. Rev. D 113, L091501 (2026) BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. Bai O. Bakina Y. Ban H. -R. Bao V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. C. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du S. X. Du X. L. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang J. Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng L. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez T. T. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji X. Q. Jia Z. K. Jia D. Jiang H. B. Jiang P. C. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki X. L. Kang X. S. Kang M. Kavatsyuk B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger M. Kuessner X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li Hui Li J. R. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. X. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat D. X. Lin L. Q. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma Y. M. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Malde Q. A. Malik H. X. Mao Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti X. Pan Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi M. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S Stansilaus F. Stieler S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian I. Uman B. Wang B. Wang Bo Wang C. Wang C. Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang H. J. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang M. Wang N. Y. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang T. J. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Y. N. Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. Wu Y. J. Wu Z. Wu L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing C. J. Xu G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu M. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang Y. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Y. C. Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan J. Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. J. Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan Shunan Zhang B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang G. Y. Zhang H. Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Z. Z. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang G. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao L. Zhao M. G. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. Zhu L. X. Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang J. H. Zou J. Zu 10.1103/wrv9-t9vv http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27795v2 2026-05-01T12:47:55Z

A search is presented for a light charged Higgs boson H$^\pm$ in top quark pair production ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$), where one of the top quarks decays to an H$^\pm$ and a bottom quark, while the other decays to a W$^\mp$ boson and a bottom quark. The H$^\pm$ is assumed to decay into a charm and a strange quark, whereas the W$^\mp$ boson decays into a charged lepton (electron or muon) and a neutrino. Results are reported based on proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The analysis probes H$^\pm$ masses in the range 40 to 160 GeV using the invariant mass spectrum of the two light jets, where light jets are defined as jets that do not satisfy the bottom quark tagging requirement. The observed yield is found to be consistent with standard model predictions. Upper limits are set on the branching fraction $\mathcal{B}$(t $\to$ H$^\pm$ b), with values in the range of 0.07$-$1.12% at 95% confidence level, under the assumption that $\mathcal{B}$(H$^\pm$ $\to$ cs) = 100%. These are the first direct limits on charged Higgs bosons produced in top quark decays for masses between 40 and 50 GeV, and the most stringent limits to date in the 70$-$110 GeV range.

2026-04-30T12:40:10Z Submitted to the Journal of High Energy Physics. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/B2G-23-003 (CMS Public Pages). This version corrects the CERN preprint number CMS Collaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00615v1 2026-05-01T12:32:29Z

A first observation of the rare decay $η$ $\to$ $μ^+μ^-$e$^+$e$^-$ is reported by the CMS Collaboration at the CERN LHC. The result is based on a proton-proton collision data sample at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38.0 fb$^{-1}$, acquired in 2022 using a high-rate dimuon trigger. Using the $η$ $\to$ $μ^+μ^-γ$ decay channel for normalization, the branching fraction is measured to be $\mathcal{B}$($η$ $\to$ $μ^+μ^-$e$^+$e$^-$) = (2.4 $\pm$ 0.8)$\times$ 10$^{-6}$, with the uncertainty including statistical and systematic sources as well as the $\mathcal{B}$($η$ $\to$ $μ^+μ^-γ$) uncertainty. This result is close to two orders of magnitude smaller than the existing limit, and is consistent with recent theoretical predictions.

2026-05-01T12:32:29Z Submitted to Physical Review Letters. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/BPH-24-001 (CMS Public Pages) CMS Collaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00549v1 2026-05-01T10:04:25Z

Limits on spin-0 axion-like-particles (ALPs) coupling to photons are reinterpreted as constraints on massive spin-2 graviton-like-particles (GLPs) with universal coupling $α_\text{G}/M_\text{P}$ (where $M_\text{P}$ is the reduced Planck mass) to the Standard Model fields. A minimally model-dependent recasting is performed, exploiting the formally analogous production and detection mechanisms for both particle types, based on the Primakoff and Gertsenshtein effects, i.e., photon-axion/graviton conversion. Constraints originally derived in the ALP mass vs. photon-coupling plane ($m_\text{a}, g_{\text{a}γ}$) are translated into the corresponding bounds in the GLP ($m_\text{G}, α_\text{G}/M_\text{P}$) parameter space over the full mass range, $m_\text{a,G} \approx 10^{-20}$--$10^{14}$eV probed in current and future experimental setups including cavity-based detectors (haloscopes and resonant upconversion devices), helioscopes, magnetometers, optical interferometers, beam dumps, fixed-target, and collider experiments, as well as astrophysical and cosmological constraints. Generic scenarios are considered in which GLPs are a dark matter candidate and not. Whereas current ALP searches do not set stronger bounds on massive spin-2 particles than fifth-force tests, future magnetometers, two-beam interferometers, and upconversion experiments have the potential to provide very strong sensitivity, down to $α_\text{G}/M_\text{P} \approx 10^{-32} \text{GeV}^{-1}$, for light graviton-like particles with $m_\text{G}\lesssim 10^{-8}$eV. These future detectors exhibit comparatively greater sensitivity to massive gravitons than to axions. For massive gravitons at the TeV scale, exclusive diphoton decay searches, employed in ALP studies, offer a complementary approach to standard searches for spin-2 resonances in other inclusive final states.

2026-05-01T10:04:25Z 45 pages, 9 figures Jordan Gué David d'Enterria