https://arxiv.org/api/s2yDobOYmbw3GgYRZKYRf4uH5m4 2026-06-14T19:29:19Z 60385 600 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16290v4 Development and Testing of a Modular Large-Area Cosmic Ray Telescope Using Scintillator-Fiber Hybrid Design for Millimeter-Level Muon Tracking 2026-05-06T08:24:10Z Cosmic-ray muons, owing to their high penetration power and abundance, have been widely employed as a natural probe in experimental particle physics. We developed a meter-scale cosmic-ray muon telescope, consisting of two parallel super-layers (1 m $\times$ 1 m) separated vertically by one meter. A super-layer is composed of two orthogonal detection layers, of which each consists of eighteen modules arranged in parallel and packed closely together. A module consists of a plastic scintillating bar precisely aligned and stacked on top of an underlying scintillating fiber mat in which fibers are arranged in a row of bundles. For a detection layer, each scintillator bar is coupled to a PMT while fiber bundles at the same position within all modules are coupled to a single PMT. Signals from scintillating bars and fibers are combined together to determine hit positions. With this detection scheme, the telescope can meet the requirement of spatial resolution and reduce the number of readout electronic channels. This article presents the comprehensive development of the telescope, encompassing its geometric design, data acquisition system, and performance evaluation. Experimental results show that the telescope achieves a position resolution better than 2 mm and an overall detection efficiency of $\sim$85%. The innovative design keeps the manufacturing cost low while maintaining high spatial resolution and detection efficiency. 2025-11-20T12:12:55Z 7 pages, 20 figures Yan Niu Anqing Wang Xiangxiang Ren Dong Liu Meng Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19612v2 QCD-factorization amplitudes from flavour symmetries: beyond the $SU(3)$ symmetric case 2026-05-06T07:39:14Z Using experimental information on branching ratios as well as direct and mixing-induced CP asymmetries, we perform a data-driven analysis of charmless non-leptonic $B \to PP$ decays, where $P$ is any of the light pseudoscalar mesons. Implementing flavour-$SU(3)$ breaking at the level of transition form factors, decay constants and phase space factors, we find a good fit to the current experimental data. Our best-fit point materializes in QCD-factorization amplitudes whose central values resemble many features of the dynamical predictions obtained within the QCD factorization framework. Moreover, we do not find any strong indications that the size of annihilation amplitudes is numerically enhanced beyond the naïve $Λ_{\textrm{QCD}}/m_b$ scaling. Subsequently, we address a number of phenomenological applications, among which are various flavour puzzles that have been persisting in non-leptonic $B$ decays for quite some time. 2026-04-21T15:59:33Z 50 pages, 23 tables, and 3 figures; changed to JHEP format, references corrected and updated Wen-Sheng Fang Tobias Huber Xin-Qiang Li Eleftheria Malami Gilberto Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04584v1 Differential measurements of $γγ\toττ$ and constraints on $τ$-lepton electromagnetic moments in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV with ATLAS 2026-05-06T07:33:13Z This paper presents the first differential fiducial measurements of $γγ\toττ$ using 1.93 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb data at $\sqrt{s_{_\text{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV recorded by the ATLAS detector. Events in which one of the $τ$-leptons decays into a muon and two neutrinos $τ\toν_τ\barν_μμ$ are selected and are categorized into three regions by the presence of an electron or either one or three charged-particle track(s) from the second $τ$-lepton decay. The measurement is performed in events where both Pb ions remain intact and no neutrons are emitted. Differential cross-sections are measured for seven variables in three fiducial regions at particle level. The measurements are compared to theory predictions with different photon flux models and spin correlation effects. For the fiducial region with one muon and one electron in the final state, comparisons to next-to-leading-order electroweak predictions are also made. The transverse momentum ($p_\text{T}$) of the decay muon, the $p_\text{T}$ of the visible decay particles of the other $τ$-lepton, the total $p_\text{T}$, invariant mass, and pseudorapidity of the visible particles from the di-$τ$ system, and the rapidity and acoplanarity of the visible decay particles from either $τ$-lepton are measured. A maximum-likelihood fit to the muon transverse-momentum distributions in the three regions before unfolding is performed to extract the $τ$-lepton anomalous magnetic moment $a_τ$ and electric dipole moment $d_τ$, the latter for the first time in heavy ion collisions. The observed 95% confidence level intervals are $-0.057 <a_τ< 0.035$ and $|d_τ|< 2.7 \times 10^{-16}~e\text{cm}$.} 2026-05-06T07:33:13Z 56 pages in total, author list starting page 38, 5 tables, 11 figures, submitted to JHEP. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HION-2025-07 The ATLAS Collaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04387v1 Landscape of Spontaneous CP Violation 2026-05-06T01:22:45Z Spontaneous CP violation (SCPV) provides a promising solution to the strong CP problem, explaining the smallness of the QCD $θ$-angle while generating the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) phase. In the present work, we review and discuss the realization of SCPV in the supersymmetric framework, which addresses critical issues such as the naturalness of the scale of SCPV and the presence of problematic higher dimensional operators and radiative corrections spoiling the mechanism. It is explicitly shown that SCPV is realized along flat directions and stabilized through supersymmetry-breaking effects and a non-perturbative dynamics, predicting light SCPV sector particles feebly coupled to the Standard Model particles. Furthermore, we discuss the issue of baryon asymmetric Universe in the SCPV framework and point out that the Affleck-Dine mechanism can successfully generate the observed baryon asymmetry with a low reheating temperature compatible with the gravitino dark matter. Our framework predicts a nonzero neutron electric dipole moment which is within the reach of near-future experiments. 2026-05-06T01:22:45Z Contribution to the 2026 Electroweak session of the 60th Rencontres de Moriond Yuichiro Nakai http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04383v1 Production of $D_s\bar{D}_s$ and $D\bar{D}$ bound states in the $B$ decays within the Bethe-Salpeter framework 2026-05-06T01:19:53Z Within the Bethe--Salpeter framework, we investigate the production of possible $D_s\bar{D}_s$ $(X_{s\bar{s}})$ and $D\bar{D}$ $(X_{q\bar{q}})$ bound states in $B$ decays. The bound state properties of the two heavy meson systems are studied in the one-boson-exchange model, and the resulting normalized Bethe--Salpeter wave functions are used to calculate the branching fractions of $B^+\to X_{s\bar s}K^+$ and $B^+\to X_{q\bar q}K^+$. We find that bound state solutions for the $D\bar{D}$ system exist for all the three coupling sets considered, whereas the $D_s\bar{D}_s$ system supports a bound-state solution only in a restricted parameter region. The predicted branching fractions are in the ranges of $1.09\times10^{-5}$--$20.06\times10^{-4}$ for the $D_s\bar{D}_s$ bound state and $1.56\times10^{-6}$--$4.14\times10^{-4}$ for the $D\bar{D}$ bound state. In particular, if $X(3915)$ is interpreted as a predominantly $D_s\bar{D}_s$ bound state, its production 2026-05-06T01:19:53Z 17 pages, 8 figures Zhen-Yang Wang Jing-Juan Qi Zhen-Hua Zhang Xin-Heng Guo http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04348v1 Observation of the charmless purely baryonic decay $\mathinner{\mathitΛ^0_b\!\to \mathitΛ p \overline{p}}$ 2026-05-05T23:08:46Z A search for the charmless purely baryonic decay $\mathinner{\mathitΛ^0_b\!\to \mathitΛ p \overline{p}}$ is performed using proton-proton collision data recorded by the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13\,\text{TeV}$ and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $6.0\,\text{fb}^{-1}$. The signal decay is observed with a significance of 5.1 standard deviations. Its branching fraction is measured for the first time, relative to that of the topologically similar decay $\mathinner{\mathitΛ^0_b\!\to \mathitΛ K^+ K^-}$. Contributions from intermediate charmonium resonances decaying to the $p \overline{p}$ and $K^+ K^-$ final states are explicitly excluded with a requirement on the invariant mass of the companion hadron system, $m(h\bar{h}) < 2.85\,\text{GeV}$, where $h$ stands for a proton or a charged kaon. The relative branching fraction is found to be $$ \frac{B(\mathinner{\mathitΛ^0_b\!\to \mathitΛ p \overline{p}})}{B(\mathinner{\mathitΛ^0_b\!\to \mathitΛ K^+ K^-})} = (5.1 \pm 1.3_{\text{(stat)}} \pm 0.3_{\text{(syst)}}) \times 10^{-2} \,. $$ 2026-05-05T23:08:46Z All figures and tables, along with machine-readable versions and any supplementary material and additional information, are available at https://lbfence.cern.ch/alcm/public/analysis/full-details/1600/ (LHCb public pages) LHCb collaboration R. Aaij M. Abdelfatah A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb C. Abellan Beteta F. Abudinén T. Ackernley A. A. Adefisoye B. Adeva M. Adinolfi P. Adlarson C. Agapopoulou C. A. Aidala S. Akar K. Akiba P. Albicocco J. Albrecht R. Aleksiejunas F. Alessio P. Alvarez Cartelle S. Amato J. L. Amey Y. Amhis L. An L. Anderlini M. Andersson P. Andreola M. Andreotti S. Andres Estrada A. Anelli D. Ao C. Arata F. Archilli Z. Areg M. Argenton S. Arguedas Cuendis L. Arnone M. Artuso E. Aslanides R. Ataíde Da Silva M. Atzeni B. Audurier J. A. Authier D. Bacher I. Bachiller Perea S. Bachmann M. Bachmayer J. J. Back Z. B. Bai V. Balagura A. Balboni W. Baldini Z. Baldwin L. Balzani H. Bao J. Baptista de Souza Leite C. Barbero Pretel M. Barbetti I. R. Barbosa R. J. Barlow M. Barnyakov S. Barsuk W. Barter J. Bartz S. Bashir B. Batsukh P. B. Battista A. Bavarchee A. Bay A. Beck M. Becker F. Bedeschi I. B. Bediaga N. A. Behling S. Belin A. Bellavista I. Belov I. Belyaev G. Bencivenni E. Ben-Haim R. Bernet A. Bertolin F. Betti J. Bex O. Bezshyyko S. Bhattacharya M. S. Bieker N. V. Biesuz A. Biolchini M. Birch F. C. R. Bishop A. Bitadze A. Bizzeti T. Blake F. Blanc J. E. Blank S. Blusk J. A. Boelhauve O. Boente Garcia T. Boettcher A. Bohare C. Bolognani R. Bolzonella R. B. Bonacci A. Bordelius F. Borgato S. Borghi M. Borsato J. T. Borsuk E. Bottalico S. A. Bouchiba M. Bovill T. J. V. Bowcock A. Boyer C. Bozzi J. D. Brandenburg A. Brea Rodriguez N. Breer C. Breitfeld J. Brodzicka J. Brown D. Brundu E. Buchanan M. Burgos Marcos C. Burr C. Buti J. S. Butter J. Buytaert W. Byczynski S. Cadeddu H. Cai Y. Cai A. Caillet R. Calabrese L. Calefice M. Calvi M. Calvo Gomez P. Camargo Magalhaes J. I. Cambon Bouzas P. Campana A. C. Campos A. F. Campoverde Quezada Y. Cao S. Capelli M. Caporale L. Capriotti R. Caravaca-Mora A. Carbone L. Carcedo Salgado R. Cardinale A. Cardini P. Carniti L. Carus A. Casais Vidal R. Caspary G. Casse M. Cattaneo G. Cavallero V. Cavallini S. Celani I. Celestino S. Cesare A. J. Chadwick I. Chahrour M. Charles Ph. Charpentier E. Chatzianagnostou R. Cheaib M. Chefdeville C. Chen J. Chen S. Chen Z. Chen A. Chen Hu M. Cherif S. Chernyshenko X. Chiotopoulos G. Chizhik V. Chobanova M. Chrzaszcz V. Chulikov P. Ciambrone X. Cid Vidal P. Cifra P. E. L. Clarke M. Clemencic H. V. Cliff J. Closier C. Cocha Toapaxi V. Coco J. Cogan E. Cogneras L. Cojocariu S. Collaviti P. Collins T. Colombo M. Colonna A. Comerma-Montells L. Congedo J. Connaughton A. Contu N. Cooke G. Cordova C. Coronel I. Corredoira A. Correia G. Corti G. C. Costantino J. Cottee Meldrum B. Couturier D. C. Craik N. Crepet M. Cruz Torres M. Cubero Campos E. Curras Rivera R. Currie C. L. Da Silva X. Dai J. Dalseno C. D'Ambrosio G. Darze A. Davidson J. E. Davies O. De Aguiar Francisco C. De Angelis F. De Benedetti J. de Boer K. De Bruyn S. De Capua M. De Cian U. De Freitas Carneiro Da Graca E. De Lucia J. M. De Miranda L. De Paula M. De Serio P. De Simone F. De Vellis J. A. de Vries F. Debernardis D. Decamp S. Dekkers L. Del Buono B. Delaney J. Deng V. Denysenko O. Deschamps F. Dettori B. Dey P. Di Nezza S. Ding Y. Ding L. Dittmann A. D. Docheva A. Doheny C. Dong F. Dordei A. C. dos Reis A. D. Dowling L. Dreyfus W. Duan P. Duda L. Dufour V. Duk P. Durante M. M. Duras J. M. Durham O. D. Durmus K. Duwe A. Dziurda S. Easo E. Eckstein U. Egede S. Eisenhardt E. Ejopu L. Eklund M. Elashri D. Elizondo Blanco J. Ellbracht S. Ely A. Ene J. Eschle T. Evans F. Fabiano S. Faghih L. N. Falcao B. Fang R. Fantechi L. Fantini M. Faria K. Farmer F. Fassin D. Fazzini L. Felkowski C. Feng M. Feng A. Fernandez Casani M. Fernandez Gomez A. D. Fernez F. Ferrari F. Ferreira Rodrigues M. Ferrillo M. Ferro-Luzzi R. A. Fini M. Fiorini M. Firlej K. L. Fischer D. S. Fitzgerald C. Fitzpatrick T. Fiutowski F. Fleuret A. Fomin M. Fontana L. A. Foreman R. Forty D. Foulds-Holt V. Franco Lima M. Franco Sevilla M. Frank E. Franzoso G. Frau C. Frei D. A. Friday J. Fu Q. Führing T. Fulghesu G. Galati M. D. Galati A. Gallas Torreira D. Galli S. Gambetta M. Gandelman P. Gandini B. Ganie H. Gao R. Gao T. Q. Gao Y. Gao Y. Gao Y. Gao L. M. Garcia Martin P. Garcia Moreno J. García Pardiñas P. Gardner L. Garrido C. Gaspar A. Gavrikov E. Gersabeck M. Gersabeck T. Gershon S. Ghizzo Z. Ghorbanimoghaddam F. I. Giasemis V. Gibson H. K. Giemza A. L. Gilman M. Giovannetti A. Gioventù L. Girardey M. A. Giza F. C. Glaser V. V. Gligorov C. Göbel L. Golinka-Bezshyyko E. Golobardes A. Golutvin S. Gomez Fernandez W. Gomulka F. Goncalves Abrantes I. Gonçales Vaz M. Goncerz G. Gong J. A. Gooding C. Gotti E. Govorkova J. P. Grabowski L. A. Granado Cardoso E. Graugés E. Graverini L. Grazette G. Graziani A. T. Grecu N. A. Grieser L. Grillo C. Gu M. Guarise L. Guerry A. -K. Guseinov Y. Guz T. Gys K. Habermann T. Hadavizadeh C. Hadjivasiliou G. Haefeli C. Haen S. Haken G. Hallett P. M. Hamilton Q. Han X. Han S. Hansmann-Menzemer N. Harnew T. J. Harris M. Hartmann S. Hashmi J. He N. Heatley A. Hedes F. Hemmer C. Henderson R. Henderson R. D. L. Henderson A. M. Hennequin K. Hennessy J. Herd P. Herrero Gascon J. Heuel A. Heyn A. Hicheur G. Hijano Mendizabal J. Horswill R. Hou Y. Hou D. C. Houston N. Howarth W. Hu X. Hu W. Hulsbergen R. J. Hunter D. Hutchcroft M. Idzik P. Ilten A. Iohner H. Jage S. J. Jaimes Elles S. Jakobsen T. Jakoubek E. Jans A. Jawahery C. Jayaweera A. Jelavic V. Jevtic Z. Jia E. Jiang X. Jiang Y. Jiang Y. J. Jiang E. Jimenez Moya N. Jindal M. John A. John Rubesh Rajan D. Johnson C. R. Jones S. Joshi B. Jost J. Juan Castella N. Jurik I. Juszczak K. Kalecinska D. Kaminaris S. Kandybei M. Kane Y. Kang C. Kar M. Karacson A. Kauniskangas J. W. Kautz M. K. Kazanecki F. Keizer M. Kenzie T. Ketel B. Khanji S. Kholodenko G. Khreich F. Kiraz T. Kirn V. S. Kirsebom N. Kleijne A. Kleimenova D. K. Klekots K. Klimaszewski M. R. Kmiec T. Knospe R. Kolb S. Koliiev L. Kolk A. Konoplyannikov P. Kopciewicz P. Koppenburg A. Korchin I. Kostiuk O. Kot S. Kotriakhova E. Kowalczyk O. Kravcov M. Kreps W. Krupa W. Krzemien O. Kshyvanskyi S. Kubis M. Kucharczyk A. Kupsc V. Kushnir B. Kutsenko J. Kvapil I. Kyryllin D. Lacarrere P. Laguarta Gonzalez A. Lai A. Lampis D. Lancierini C. Landesa Gomez J. J. Lane G. Lanfranchi C. Langenbruch T. Latham F. Lazzari C. Lazzeroni R. Le Gac H. Lee R. Lefèvre M. Lehuraux E. Lemos Cid O. Leroy T. Lesiak E. D. Lesser B. Leverington A. Li C. Li C. Li H. Li J. Li K. Li L. Li P. Li P. -R. Li Q. Li T. Li T. Li Y. Li Y. Li Y. Li Z. Lian Q. Liang X. Liang Z. Liang S. Libralon A. Lightbody T. Lin R. Lindner H. Linton R. Litvinov D. Liu F. L. Liu G. Liu K. Liu S. Liu W. Liu Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. L. Liu G. Loachamin Ordonez I. Lobo A. Lobo Salvia A. Loi T. Long F. C. L. Lopes J. H. Lopes A. Lopez Huertas C. Lopez Iribarnegaray Q. Lu C. Lucarelli D. Lucchesi M. Lucio Martinez Y. Luo A. Lupato M. Lupberger E. Luppi K. Lynch S. Lyu X. -R. Lyu H. Ma S. Maccolini F. Machefert F. Maciuc B. Mack I. Mackay L. M. Mackey V. Macko L. R. Madhan Mohan M. J. Madurai D. Magdalinski J. J. Malczewski S. Malde L. Malentacca G. Manca G. Mancinelli C. Mancuso R. Manera Escalero A. Mangalasseri F. M. Manganella D. Manuzzi S. Mao D. Marangotto J. F. Marchand R. Marchevski U. Marconi E. Mariani S. Mariani C. Marin Benito J. Marks A. M. Marshall L. Martel G. Martelli G. Martellotti L. Martinazzoli M. Martinelli C. Martinez D. Martinez Gomez D. Martinez Santos F. Martinez Vidal A. Martorell i Granollers A. Massafferri R. Matev A. Mathad C. Matteuzzi K. R. Mattioli A. Mauri E. Maurice J. Mauricio P. Mayencourt J. Mazorra de Cos M. Mazurek D. Mazzanti Tarancon M. McCann N. T. McHugh A. McNab R. McNulty B. Meadows D. Melnychuk D. Mendoza Granada P. Menendez Valdes Perez F. M. Meng M. Merk A. Merli L. Meyer Garcia D. Miao H. Miao M. Mikhasenko D. A. Milanes A. Minotti E. Minucci B. Mitreska D. S. Mitzel R. Mocanu A. Modak L. Moeser R. D. Moise E. F. Molina Cardenas T. Mombächer M. Monk T. Monnard S. Monteil A. Morcillo Gomez G. Morello M. J. Morello M. P. Morgenthaler A. Moro J. Moron W. Morren A. B. Morris A. G. Morris R. Mountain Z. Mu N. Muangkod E. Muhammad F. Muheim M. Mulder K. Müller F. Muñoz-Rojas V. Mytrochenko P. Naik T. Nakada R. Nandakumar G. Napoletano I. Nasteva M. Needham N. Neri S. Neubert N. Neufeld J. Nicolini D. Nicotra E. M. Niel L. Nisi Q. Niu B. K. Njoki P. Nogarolli P. Nogga C. Normand J. Novoa Fernandez G. Nowak H. N. Nur A. Oblakowska-Mucha T. Oeser O. Okhrimenko R. Oldeman F. Oliva E. Olivart Pino M. Olocco R. H. O'Neil J. S. Ordonez Soto D. Osthues J. M. Otalora Goicochea P. Owen A. Oyanguren O. Ozcelik F. Paciolla A. Padee K. O. Padeken B. Pagare T. Pajero A. Palano L. Palini M. Palutan C. Pan X. Pan S. Panebianco S. Paniskaki L. Paolucci A. Papanestis M. Pappagallo L. L. Pappalardo C. Pappenheimer C. Parkes D. Parmar G. Passaleva D. Passaro A. Pastore M. Patel J. Patoc C. Patrignani A. Paul C. J. Pawley A. Pellegrino J. Peng X. Peng M. Pepe Altarelli S. Perazzini H. Pereira Da Costa M. Pereira Martinez A. Pereiro Castro C. Perez P. Perret A. Perrevoort A. Perro M. J. Peters K. Petridis A. Petrolini S. Pezzulo J. P. Pfaller H. Pham L. Pica M. Piccini L. Piccolo B. Pietrzyk R. N. Pilato D. Pinci F. Pisani M. Pizzichemi V. M. Placinta M. Plo Casasus T. Poeschl F. Polci M. Poli Lener A. Poluektov I. Polyakov E. Polycarpo S. Ponce D. Popov K. Popp K. Prasanth C. Prouve D. Provenzano V. Pugatch A. Puicercus Gomez G. Punzi J. R. Pybus Q. Qian W. Qian N. Qin R. Quagliani R. I. Rabadan Trejo R. Racz J. H. Rademacker M. Rama M. Ramírez García V. Ramos De Oliveira M. Ramos Pernas M. S. Rangel G. Raven M. Rebollo De Miguel F. Redi J. Reich F. Reiss Z. Ren P. K. Resmi M. Ribalda Galvez R. Ribatti G. Ricart D. Riccardi S. Ricciardi K. Richardson M. Richardson-Slipper F. Riehn K. Rinnert P. Robbe G. Robertson E. Rodrigues A. Rodriguez Alvarez E. Rodriguez Fernandez J. A. Rodriguez Lopez E. Rodriguez Rodriguez J. Roensch A. Rogovskiy D. L. Rolf P. Roloff V. Romanovskiy A. Romero Vidal G. Romolini F. Ronchetti T. Rong M. Rotondo M. S. Rudolph M. Ruiz Diaz J. Ruiz Vidal J. J. Saavedra-Arias J. J. Saborido Silva S. E. R. Sacha Emile R. D. Sahoo N. Sahoo B. Saitta M. Salomoni I. Sanderswood R. Santacesaria C. Santamarina Rios M. Santimaria L. Santoro E. Santovetti A. Saputi A. Sarnatskiy G. Sarpis M. Sarpis C. Satriano A. Satta M. Saur H. Sazak F. Sborzacchi A. Scarabotto S. Schael S. Scherl M. Schiller H. Schindler M. Schmelling B. Schmidt N. Schmidt S. Schmitt H. Schmitz O. Schneider A. Schopper N. Schulte M. H. Schune G. Schwering B. Sciascia A. Sciuccati G. Scriven I. Segal S. Sellam T. Senger M. Senghi Soares A. Sergi N. Serra L. Sestini B. Sevilla Sanjuan Y. Shang D. M. Shangase R. S. Sharma L. Shchutska T. Shears J. Shen Z. Shen S. Sheng B. Shi J. Shi Q. Shi W. S. Shi E. Shmanin R. Silva Coutinho G. Simi S. Simone M. Singha I. Siral N. Skidmore T. Skwarnicki M. W. Slater E. Smith M. Smith L. Soares Lavra M. D. Sokoloff F. J. P. Soler A. Solomin K. Solovieva N. S. Sommerfeld R. Song Y. Song Y. Song Y. S. Song F. L. Souza De Almeida B. Souza De Paula K. M. Sowa E. Spadaro Norella E. Spedicato J. G. Speer P. Spradlin F. Stagni M. Stahl S. Stahl S. Stanislaus M. Stefaniak O. Steinkamp F. Suljik J. Sun J. Sun L. Sun D. Sundfeld W. Sutcliffe P. Svihra V. Svintozelskyi K. Swientek F. Swystun A. Szabelski T. Szumlak Y. Tan Y. Tang Y. T. Tang M. D. Tat J. A. Teijeiro Jimenez F. Terzuoli F. Teubert E. Thomas D. J. D. Thompson A. R. Thomson-Strong H. Tilquin V. Tisserand S. T'Jampens M. Tobin T. T. Todorov L. Tomassetti G. Tonani X. Tong T. Tork L. Toscano D. Y. Tou C. Trippl G. Tuci N. Tuning L. H. Uecker A. Ukleja A. Upadhyay B. Urbach A. Usachov U. Uwer V. Vagnoni A. Vaitkevicius V. Valcarce Cadenas G. Valenti N. Valls Canudas J. van Eldik H. Van Hecke E. van Herwijnen C. B. Van Hulse R. Van Laak M. van Veghel G. Vasquez R. Vazquez Gomez P. Vazquez Regueiro C. Vázquez Sierra S. Vecchi J. Velilla Serna J. J. Velthuis M. Veltri A. Venkateswaran M. Verdoglia M. Vesterinen W. Vetens D. Vico Benet P. Vidrier Villalba M. Vieites Diaz X. Vilasis-Cardona E. Vilella Figueras A. Villa P. Vincent B. Vivacqua F. C. Volle D. vom Bruch K. Vos C. Vrahas J. Wagner J. Walsh N. Walter E. J. Walton G. Wan A. Wang B. Wang C. Wang G. Wang H. Wang J. Wang J. Wang J. Wang J. Wang M. Wang N. W. Wang R. Wang X. Wang X. Wang X. Wang X. W. Wang Y. Wang Y. Wang Y. H. Wang Z. Wang Z. Wang J. A. Ward M. Waterlaat N. K. Watson D. Websdale Y. Wei Z. Weida J. Wendel B. D. C. Westhenry C. White M. Whitehead E. Whiter A. R. Wiederhold D. Wiedner M. A. Wiegertjes C. Wild G. Wilkinson M. K. Wilkinson M. Williams M. J. Williams M. R. J. Williams R. Williams S. Williams Z. Williams F. F. Wilson M. Winn W. Wislicki M. Witek L. Witola T. Wolf E. Wood G. Wormser S. A. Wotton H. Wu J. Wu X. Wu Y. Wu Z. Wu K. Wyllie S. Xian Z. Xiang Y. Xie T. X. Xing A. Xu L. Xu M. Xu R. Xu Z. Xu Z. Xu Z. Xu Z. Xu S. Yadav K. Yang X. Yang Y. Yang Y. Yang Z. Yang Z. Yang H. Yeung H. Yin X. Yin C. Y. Yu J. Yu X. Yuan Y Yuan J. A. Zamora Saa M. Zavertyaev M. Zdybal F. Zenesini C. Zeng M. Zeng S. H Zeng C. Zhang D. Zhang J. Zhang L. Zhang R. Zhang S. Zhang S. L. Zhang Y. Zhang Z. Zhang J. Zhao Y. Zhao A. Zhelezov S. Z. Zheng X. Z. Zheng Y. Zheng T. Zhou X. Zhou V. Zhovkovska L. Z. Zhu X. Zhu X. Zhu Y. Zhu V. Zhukov J. Zhuo D. Zuliani G. Zunica http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02256v2 Impact of Higgs-boson measurements on SMEFT fits 2026-05-05T21:16:26Z We present current bounds on SMEFT operators that are mainly constrained by Higgs-boson observables, under different assumptions for the flavour structure of the UV theory. We investigate how the accuracy reached through a dedicated Higgs-boson precision physics program is starting to have a major impact in setting a lower bound on the scale of new physics, and we discuss the relevance of considering the scale evolution of the SMEFT coefficients in this context. We compare our results with the literature, pointing out the consistency of the results in spite of the different assumptions adopted in each analysis, and we discuss future steps aimed at improving the accuracy of the fit. 2025-12-01T22:57:09Z 12 pages, 2 figures, 4 tables. Contribution to the Report 5 of the LHC Higgs Working Group J. de Blas A. Goncalves V. Miralles L. Reina L. Silvestrini M. Valli http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04240v1 Gamma Factory: A New Experimental Paradigm for CERN's HL-LHC--FCC-ee Transition 2026-05-05T19:27:34Z The Gamma Factory (GF) proposal \cite{Krasny:2015ffb} is motivated by the recognition of a largely untapped potential of the CERN accelerator complex to enable a new research programme at the intersection of particle, nuclear, atomic, fundamental, and applied physics. The central concept is to produce, accelerate, cool, and store atomic beams of highly relativistic partially stripped ions in the LHC, which would serve as an effective atomic trap. The internal degrees of freedom of these ions are then resonantly excited using laser photons. In the GF scheme, laser-cooled atomic beams serve both as high-precision probes and as low-emittance beam sources for high-luminosity LHC operation in the ion-ion collision mode. Interactions between laser pulses stored in Fabry--Perot cavities and circulating ion beams give rise to high-energy, highly collimated, and polarised secondary photon beams. Their expected intensities exceed those of existing gamma-ray sources by several orders of magnitude. These photon beams can further be used to generate unprecedented-intensity, tertiary beams of polarised electrons, positrons, muons, neutrons, radioactive ions, and flavour- or CP-tagged neutrinos. Furthermore, under a specific configuration, the same photon-driven processes may be exploited in an energy-production scheme generating the requisite plug-power for LHC operation. Together, cold relativistic atomic beams, high-intensity photon beams, and tertiary beams constitute a versatile experimental platform capable of opening a wide range of new scientific opportunities at CERN. By exploiting existing accelerator infrastructure and available state-of-the-art laser technologies, the GF offers a path to a cost-effective and timely programme capable of sustaining experimental innovation and bridging the gap between the HL-LHC era and the future FCC era. 2026-05-05T19:27:34Z 23 pages, 4 figures Mieczyslaw Witold Krasny http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04233v1 Indications for New Higgs Bosons 2026-05-05T19:19:55Z After the Higgs discovery, the question of whether particles beyond those of the Standard Model exist is more pressing than ever. In this context, the scalar sector is particularly promising, since it lies at the core of the internal problems of the Standard Model, while extensions of it allow us to resolve them and can provide explanations for Dark matter, non-zero neutrino masses, inflation etc. In these proceedings, we review the indications for new Higgs bosons at the electroweak scale with masses of $\approx$95 GeV and $\approx$152 GeV. These excesses are most significant in the di-photon channel but are supported by weaker-than-expected limits in other decay modes. While for the 95 GeV candidate the production mechanism is mostly unknown, the (hypothetical) 152 GeV Higgs is dominantly produced in association with leptons, $(b)$ jets and missing energy, pointing towards the Drell-Yan production of an $SU(2)_L$ triplet with $Y=0$. Interestingly, this model predicts $t\to H^\pm b$ with $H^\pm\to WZ$, which resembles the signature of $t\bar{t}Z$ production in the Standard Model and is in fact preferred by current data. Finally, we investigate the possibility that the significant tensions between the Standard Model predictions and the measurements in differential top-quark distributions are due to contamination from new physics involving both the 152 GeV and the 95 GeV scalar. 2026-05-05T19:19:55Z Proceedings of the Corfu Summer Institute 2025 "School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity" (CORFU2025) Andreas Crivellin Saiyad Ashanujjaman Sumit Banik Siddharth P. Maharathy Guglielmo Coloretti http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04150v1 Proton-Proton to Antinucleon Cross Sections for Cosmic Ray Applications 2026-05-05T18:00:05Z We present predictions of inclusive antiproton and antineutron production cross sections in proton-proton collisions relevant to primary and secondary antiproton production in cosmic ray interactions with interstellar matter. Our predictions are based on collinear factorisation in Quantum Chromodynamics and are accurate to next-to-leading order in the perturbative expansion of the strong coupling. We assess the relevance of cross sections measured at collider experiments, such as NA49 at the CERN SPS and ALICE at the LHC, to the kinetic energy ranges accessed by cosmic ray detectors. We characterise the associated uncertainties due to the input parton distribution and fragmentation functions, and to missing higher orders. We critically examine the ~30% excess of antineutron over antiproton production in proton-proton collisions preliminarily reported by the NA49 experiment by combining our predictions with a data-driven model. Our results do not support the NA49 finding, and point to a mild excess of a few percent. We finally show that the NA49 result could only be reconciled with our framework by invoking sizeable differences between antiproton and antineutron production in the poorly constrained region of small transverse momenta of the produced hadron. 2026-05-05T18:00:05Z 21 pages, 7 figures, 1 table Mariaelena Boglione Mattia di Mauro Fiorenza Donato Emanuele R. Nocera Jennifer Rittenhouse West Andrea Signori http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04143v1 Composite top partners in exotic colour representations 2026-05-05T18:00:01Z Composite Higgs models with partial compositeness generically predict coloured fermionic resonances associated with the strong dynamics responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking. While most phenomenological studies have focused on colour-triplet and colour-octet top partners, several UV-complete hypercolour constructions also contain fermionic colour sextets. We present a systematic study of these states in the minimal model classes where they arise, constructing the relevant low-energy interactions and deriving their characteristic decay patterns. The sextets predominantly decay through coloured pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons, leading to top-rich final states, while additional channels with $b$-jets and missing transverse energy can be important. We reinterpret existing ATLAS and CMS searches for high-multiplicity final states to derive the dedicated constraints on these resonances. For the benchmark spectra considered, current LHC data exclude individual sextet components up to masses in the $2-2.5$ TeV regime, with stronger bounds when the full sextet multiplet is included, while conservative extrapolations to the HL-LHC indicate a reach close to $3$ TeV. Our results therefore show that colour-sextet fermions provide a powerful and largely unexplored probe of composite Higgs models with partial compositeness. 2026-05-05T18:00:01Z 23 pages, 6 figures, two appendices Giacomo Cacciapaglia Rosy Caliri Aldo Deandrea Benjamin Fuks Mark Goodsell Jan Hadlik Manuel Kunkel Werner Porod http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04014v1 Predictions for the scalar partner of the LHC tetraquark $X(6600)$ 2026-05-05T17:37:21Z We consider how the recent CMS measurements of the masses and quantum numbers of $X(6600)$, $X(6900)$ and $X(7100)$ can help to reveal the internal structure of these apparent $cc\bar{c}\bar{c}$ tetraquark states. The measured $J^{PC} = 2^{++}$ quantum numbers of $X(6600)$ are consistent with our previous prediction, and imply the existence of lighter $0^{++}$ partner $X(6400)$ which also decays to $J/ψJ/ψ$. There may already be indications for this scalar partner in the recent CMS data fits, which include a Breit-Wigner peak with mass around 6400~MeV. We give predictions for the masses and decay properties of the scalar and other partner states, which are key experimental tests to discriminate between quark and diquark models. We urge closer experimental scrutiny in this mass region, to establish an S-wave multiplet of $cc \bar c \bar c$ states (the first of its kind), leading to a breakthrough in exotic hadron research and our understanding of exclusively heavy quark exotics. 2026-05-05T17:37:21Z Muhammad Naeem Anwar Timothy J. Burns http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03908v1 Searching for long-lived particles with the ILD experiment 2026-05-05T16:01:49Z Future e$^+$e$^-$ colliders provide a unique opportunity for long-lived particle (LLP) searches. We present a full simulation study of LLP searches using the International Large Detector (ILD), where a gaseous time projection chamber as the main tracking device provides excellent prospects for LLP searches. Signatures of displaced vertices and kinked tracks are explored. We study challenging final states involving both very soft displaced tracks and boosted, nearly collinear tracks. Backgrounds from beam-induced interactions and other Standard Model processes are considered. We present expected exclusion limits for a model-independent analyses, as well as for Higgs boson decays to LLPs, for a range of LLP lifetimes. 2026-05-05T16:01:49Z 6 pages, 4 figures. Contribution to the International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders (LCWS 2025), 20-24 October 2025. Valencia, Spain (C25-10-20.1). This preprint has not undergone peer review or any post-submission improvements or corrections Eur. Phys. J. Plus 141, 481 (2026) Jan Klamka Aleksander Filip Żarnecki 10.1140/epjp/s13360-026-07701-w http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03786v2 Light new physics and the $τ$ lepton dipole moments 2026-05-05T15:55:07Z Testing New-Physics (NP) scenarios that couple predominantly to the third generation is notoriously difficult experimentally, as exemplified by comparing limits for the $τ$ lepton dipole moments to those of electrons and muons. In this case, extracting limits from processes such as $e^+e^-\toτ^+τ^-$ often relies on effective-field-theory (EFT) arguments, which allow for model-independent statements, but only apply if the NP scale is sufficiently large compared to the center-of-mass energy. In this work we offer a comprehensive analysis of light NP contributions to the $τ$ dipole moments, providing a detailed account of the interpretation of asymmetry measurements in $e^+e^-\toτ^+τ^-$ that are tailored towards the extraction of dipole moments, for the test cases of new light spin-$0$ and spin-$1$ bosons. Moreover, we study the decoupling to the EFT limit in these scenarios and discuss the complementarity to constraints from other related processes, such as production in $e^+e^-$ reactions. While covering a wide range of light NP scenarios, as specific case study we present a detailed discussion of a tauphilic gauge vector boson at Belle II. 2025-11-05T19:00:02Z 30 pages, 18 figures, journal version Phys. Rev. D 113, 095002 (2026) Martin Hoferichter Gabriele Levati 10.1103/7rsy-974z http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13966v2 Light new physics and the $τ$ lepton dipole moments: prospects at Belle II 2026-05-05T15:55:01Z While electron and muon dipole moments are well-established precision probes of physics beyond the standard model, it is notoriously challenging to test realistic new-physics (NP) scenarios for the $τ$ lepton. Constructing suitable asymmetries in $e^+e^-\toτ^+τ^-$ has emerged as a promising such avenue, providing access to the electric and magnetic dipole moment once a polarized electron beam is available, e.g., with the proposed polarization upgrade of the SuperKEKB $e^+e^-$ collider. However, this interpretation relies on an effective-field-theory (EFT) argument that only applies if the NP scale is large compared to the center-of-mass energy. In this Letter we address the consequences of the asymmetry measurements in the case of light NP, using light spin-0 and spin-1 bosons as test cases, to show how results can again be interpreted as constraints on dipole moments, albeit in a model-dependent manner, and how the decoupling to the EFT limit proceeds in these cases. In particular, we observe that the imaginary parts generated by light new particles can yield nonvanishing asymmetries even without electron polarization, which can again be interpreted as constraints on the $τ$ anomalous magnetic moment. This proposed measurement, thus, presents a novel opportunity for NP searches that can be realized already with present data at Belle II. 2025-10-15T18:00:09Z 8 pages, 3 figures, journal version Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 181804 (2026) Martin Hoferichter Gabriele Levati 10.1103/d3rt-69rd