https://arxiv.org/api/IBrkEU+6qkuneeZtJUOfTz3dFU42026-06-10T05:34:09Z603656015http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07398v1Correlating lepton flavor violating $b \to s$ and leptonic decay modes in a minimal abelian extension of the Standard Model2026-06-05T15:39:08ZWe examine possible correlations between $b \to s \ell_1^- \ell_2^+$ transitions -- both in the lepton flavor conserving ($\ell_1=\ell_2$) and violating case ($\ell_1 \neq \ell_2$) -- and purely leptonic flavor violating decays within the ABCD model [1], a minimal abelian extension of the Standard Model (SM) introducing a new $\text{U}(1)'$ symmetry. The associated neutral $Z'$ boson has generation-dependent, flavor non-universal couplings to SM fermions, governed by three rational parameters $ε_{1,2,3}$, which sum to zero to ensure gauge anomaly cancellation. Each $ε_i$ is common to all fermions of a given generation, thus inducing correlations among quark and lepton observables. For lepton flavor conserving (LFC) processes, only small deviations from SM predictions were found [2], reflecting the mutual constraints between the quark and lepton sectors, which preclude large discrepancies. On the other hand, the model allows tree-level lepton flavor violating (LFV) decays, yielding correlations between LFV $b\to s$ transitions and charged lepton decays. The analysis of such correlations shows that the current experimental upper bounds for the rates of $τ^- \to μ^-μ^+μ^-$, \ $μ^-\to e^- γ$, \ $μ^- \to e^- e^+e^-$ and $μ^- \to e^-$ conversion in nuclei constrain branching ratios of LFV $B_{(s)}$ decays in hierarchical order [2].2026-06-05T15:39:08ZLaTeX, 8 pages, 4 figures. Talk given at WIFAI 2025, Bari, November 11-14Davide Milillohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05385v2GPU optical photon Monte Carlo for noble liquid detectors: validation against Geant4 in a large liquid argon TPC benchmark2026-06-05T14:24:03ZOptical photon Monte Carlo simulation is a computational bottleneck for noble liquid Time Projection Chambers. Design studies require repeated, geometry dependent simulations of timing, wavelength shifting, and optical response, while reconstruction and particle identification workflows need labeled optical datasets. We present Simphony, a GPU optical simulation tool, formerly EIC-Opticks, built on Opticks with CUDA and NVIDIA OptiX. Simphony implements a GPU version of the Geant4 G4OpWLS wavelength-shifting model and returns Monte Carlo truth for detected hits with low per-photon overhead. We validate Simphony against Geant4 11.3.2 in a simplified 14.7 kt liquid argon Time Projection Chamber benchmark with a two-stage wavelength-shifting shell and idealized photon counting detector. For three paired 2.5 GeV electron simulations, each producing about 61 M optical photons, the integrated detected-photon ratio agrees with Geant at the subpercent level. The detected arrival time and wavelength spectra give $χ^2/\mathrm{ndf}$ values of 0.98 and 1.08. Contained muon and near-Cerenkov-threshold proton samples give $R_N=1.0017\pm0.0008$ and $R_N=1.0005\pm0.0014$, confirming agreement for distinct source topologies. On an NVIDIA RTX 4090, a stacked launch of four 2.5 GeV electron events transports 243 M optical photons in $3.03\pm0.06$ s, giving $80.2\pm1.6$ M photons s$^{-1}$. Relative to a single-thread Geant reference and including GPU overheads and host-device transfers, the optical transport speedup is $1053\pm55$; the end-to-end wall time acceleration is $89\pm5$. These results show that Simphony can make explicit optical photon Monte Carlo practical for detector development studies and for generating machine learning optical response datasets.2026-06-03T19:40:05ZGabor GalgocziXuyang NingDmitri SmirnovBrett VirenChao Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07278v1Sensor Quality Control and Annealing Studies of HGCAL Silicon Sensors2026-06-05T13:55:38ZWe summarise Sensor Quality Control (SQC) results of non-irradiated silicon sensors for the CMS HGCAL detector, as well as the first detailed annealing campaign with a wafer-scale 120\,\textmu m (Epitaxial) sensor exposed to \(2\times10^{15}\)\,\si{n_{eq}/cm^2} at the Rhode Island Nuclear Science Center (RINSC). For the non-irradiated sensors, we present an overview of the QC workflow developed for HGCAL, including automated handling of vendor data, validation of electrical measurements, and cross-checking of wafer-level characteristics. The study investigates, for the first time, the isothermal annealing behaviour at 60\,\si{\celsius} after annealing periods ranging from 10 to 5000 minutes. Hamburg-model parameters for effective doping concentration changes with annealing time, extracted from full-sensor data, are presented. The post-irradiation behaviour of sensors with hot regions in the pre-irradiation leakage current measurements, as well as epitaxial sensors with stacking faults in individual cells, is also investigated.2026-06-05T13:55:38ZGizem Gul Dinceron behalf of the CMS HGCAL Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07232v1Current and future constraints on heavy New Physics from $τ$ weak dipole moments2026-06-05T12:59:24ZWe study the weak magnetic and electric dipole moments of the $τ$ lepton as precision tests of the Standard Model (SM) and probes of heavy New Physics (NP). We present an updated SM prediction for the $τ$ weak magnetic dipole moment at one loop, including a careful assessment of theoretical uncertainties from electroweak scheme dependence. Working within the SM Effective Field Theory, we derive comprehensive current constraints on the $τ$ dipole operators from a combination of observables: the $τ$ weak and electromagnetic dipole moments, high-mass Drell-Yan tails at the LHC, $Z$ partial decay widths, and the electron electric dipole moment. Finally, we assess the prospects of measuring the SM value of the $τ$ weak magnetic moment at the FCC-$ee$ Tera-$Z$ run, and project the sensitivities of the leading observables to heavy NP at FCC-$ee$ and HL-LHC, paying particular attention to systematic uncertainties. We find that the $τ$ weak dipole moments are already among the leading probes of the $τ$ dipole operators, and will become increasingly dominant at future colliders.2026-06-05T12:59:24Z30 pages, 4 figures, 4 tablesNejc KošnikZachary PolonskyAleks Smolkovičhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07008v1Macroscopic Quantum Interference in Dark Matter Wave Scattering with MICROSCOPE2026-06-05T07:53:01ZUltralight dark matter behaves as a coherent wave, yet its quantum interference effects of elastic scattering with multiple targets have remained unexplored. We show that the nested test masses of MICROSCOPE realize such an ``interferometer'' for dark-matter wave scattering. Amplitudes from the two concentric cylinders interfere and redistribute the induced force between them. This effect produces unique and rotation-modulated signals set by the target geometry. Developing the theoretical framework and applying it to MICROSCOPE data, we obtain leading constraints on quadratic dark-matter--nucleon coupling for masses $10^{-3}$--$10^{-2}\,$eV, reaching cross sections of order $10^{-52}$ cm$^2$.2026-06-05T07:53:01ZCheng-Tao FuPeng-Shun LuoRui LuoJie ShengChuan-Yang Xinghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21872v2Study of the $Ω_{ccc}Ω_{ccc}$ and $Ω_{bbb}Ω_{bbb}$ dibaryons in QCD Sum Rules2026-06-05T03:40:09ZThe recent observation of a family of fully-charm tetraquark states by the LHCb, ATLAS and CMS Collaborations suggests the possible existence of fully-heavy dibaryons. In this work, we investigate the $Ω_{ccc}Ω_{ccc}$ and $Ω_{bbb}Ω_{bbb}$ dibaryons in both the $^1S_0$ and $^5S_2$ channels using the method of QCD sum rules. We employ the iterative dispersion relation (IDR) method to efficiently compute the massive five-loop banana diagrams that appear in these systems, and properly address the tricky small-circle divergence problem in the nonperturbative terms. Our analyses reveal that for both charm and bottom systems, the scalar dibaryon lies lower than its tensor counterpart. In $\overline{\text{MS}}$ scheme, the mass of the scalar $Ω_{ccc}Ω_{ccc}$ dibaryon is found to be slightly above the $2Ω_{ccc}$ mass threshold, while the $Ω_{bbb}Ω_{bbb}$ systems may form bound states. However, they are predicted to be much heavier in the on-shell scheme.2026-02-25T12:57:17Z8 pages, 7 figures. Accepted for publication on Physical Review DPhys. Rev. D 113, 114015 (2026)Xu-Liang ChenJin-Peng ZhangZi-Xi Ou-YangWei ChenJia-Jun Wu10.1103/gs4y-n7lwhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06773v1Lepton interactions from GeV to EeV2026-06-04T23:34:44ZIn this work, we investigate the phenomenological consequences of neutrino and muon interactions with matter. In our studies, we focused in phenomenological predictions for two experiments: FASER and IceCube. FASER is a detector located at the LHC that measures neutrinos produced in proton-proton collisions. A new version of FASER, FASER2, has been proposed to operate in the Forward Physics Facility during the high-luminosity regime of the LHC. The intense flux of tau neutrinos expected at FASER2 motivated us to study the polarization effects of the tau produced in charged current interactions. Our results show that the produced taus will not be completely polarized. Among the Standard Model particles, only neutrinos and muons produced in proton-proton collisions at the LHC can reach FASER. In our study, we show that muon-initiated events can reveal interesting nucleon properties, such as nuclear effects and the existence of an intrinsic charm. The high number of events induced by neutrinos at FASER motivated us to study rare processes in neutrino interaction, such as the neutrino trident. Our results indicate that the neutrino trident process can be observed at FASER2. We have also studied muon trident at the LHC, and we showed that tau pair production can be observed for the first time in this reaction. In contrast to neutrinos detected at the LHC, the neutrinos observed at IceCube come from natural sources, being mainly atmospheric and astrophysical neutrinos. IceCube is capable of observing neutrinos across a wide energy spectrum, ranging from a few GeV to beyond PeV. We show that the study of these events can contribute to our understanding of the structure of target hadrons, as well as the search for physics effects beyond the Standard Model in the propagation of these neutrinos in the universe until they reach the Earth.2026-06-04T23:34:44ZPhD thesisReinaldo Francenerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06603v1Reweighting Adversarial Networks for Unbinned Unfolding2026-06-04T18:00:42ZDifferential cross sections are the currency of scientific exchange in particle and nuclear physics. Recently, machine learning methods have enabled unbinned and high-dimensional cross section measurements through new approaches to unfolding. A key challenge with unfolding is that it is a bi-level optimization problem where constraints are available at the detector level while the target is at the particle level, linked by a stochastic detector response. Further complications arise when the particle-level and detector-level distributions have non-overlapping or only partially overlapping support, which can destabilize training and degrade unfolding performance. In this paper, we introduce a new unbinned unfolding technique called the Reweighting Adversarial Network (RAN), which can be viewed as a generalization of the Moment Unfolding protocol to accommodate full phase-space unfolding. RANs address the bi-level optimization problem through a particle-level reweighting function steered by a Wasserstein critic at the detector level. RANs do not require overlapping support at the detector level, nor multiple iterations of training. We evaluate the performance of RANs with Gaussian data and jet substructure studies, including cases specifically designed to stress test the method under vanishing support overlap. We demonstrate that RANs outperform state-of-the-art methods in accuracy and have a lower computational overhead.2026-06-04T18:00:42Z15 pages, 4 figures, and 3 tables. Data and code are available at https://github.com/umarsqureshi/RANUmar Sohail QureshiKrish DesaiJesse ThalerBenjamin Nachmanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06446v1Method to study $CP$ violation in $B_s^0\to K_S K^\pm π^\mp$ decays2026-06-04T17:44:01ZThe $B_s^0\to K_S K^\pm π^\mp$ decays are of interest to test the Standard Model and search for new sources of $CP$ violation. A full study of these decays requires a tagged decay-time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis performed simultaneously in the two final states. Such an analysis has never previously been performed. The method to carry out such an analysis, relating the amplitudes for decays to resonances in the two final-states to each other, is set out and its feasibility is demonstrated using pseudoexperiments. The sensitivity to the weak phase difference, $φ_s^{\rm eff}$, between $B_s^0 \to K_S K^*(892)^0$ decays with and without $B_s^0$-$\bar{B}_s^0$ mixing is studied. Good precision on $φ_s^{\rm eff}$ is found to be achievable with a dataset corresponding to LHCb Runs 1-3, with further improvement expected with datasets to be collected in future. The method is implemented in the Laura++ Dalitz-plot analysis package, and can be applied to other multibody decays with multiple final states.2026-06-04T17:44:01Z13 pages, 4 figuresChen ChenTim GershonThomas Lathamhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06436v1Probing anomalous quartic gauge couplings in same-sign $W$ boson scattering with polarization and spin correlation2026-06-04T17:38:57ZThe study of quartic couplings of electroweak gauge bosons not only provides a test of the Standard Model (SM) predictions, but also can look for signals of new physics beyond the SM. We present a comprehensive study of anomalous quartic gauge couplings in same-sign $W^\pm W^\pm$ production via vector boson scattering at the LHC. The analysis is carried out within the framework of the SM Effective Field Theory, exploiting polarization and spin-correlation effects encoded in angular asymmetries in addition to conventional kinematic observables. We demonstrate that spin-correlation asymmetries provide sensitivity to anomalous $WWWW$ interactions that is comparable to that obtained from the transverse mass distribution of the $WW$ system. By identifying a minimal set of the most sensitive asymmetries, we show that the dominant constraints on the Wilson coefficients can be captured with a reduced number of observables. A combined analysis of angular asymmetries and kinematic information leads to improved limits compared to either approach alone. The impact of unitarity considerations is also examined by imposing invariant-mass cut-offs on the $WW$ system, allowing us to determine unitarity-safe regions for the anomalous couplings.2026-06-04T17:38:57Z15 pages, 5 tables, and 8 figuresOscar J. P. ÉboliRafiqul RahamanAmir Subbahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26732v2Semiautomatic dimensional screening of plastic scintillator cubes using image analysis and robotics2026-06-04T16:11:41ZLarge-scale particle physics detectors often contain millions of repeated components, making precise and efficient quality control essential. We have developed a semiautomatic system for dimensional screening of 1 cm$^3$ plastic scintillator cubes for their potential use in future neutrino detectors. The system employs a motorized rotating stage, six high-resolution cameras, and image analysis software to measure cube size, surface protrusions, and the positions of holes for wavelength-shifting fibers used in optical readout. Based on these measurements, each cube is automatically classified as either acceptable or defective. We constructed and validated a prototype system, achieving a measurement precision of 10 $μ$m and over 80% consistency with manual screening. To enable classification of cubes into 48 groups based on hole positions while preserving their orientation, we introduced a 6-axis robotic arm. The completed system achieved a rejection rate of 3.1%. Our approach contributes to scalable, precise, and efficient quality control for future large-scale particle physics detectors.2026-03-20T13:36:48ZJINST 21 P06005 (2026)Tatsuya KikawaMao TaniAtsuko K. IchikawaTsunayuki MatsubaraTsuyoshi NakayaTomohisa Ogawa10.1088/1748-0221/21/06/P06005http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16138v2Surrogate Neural Architecture Codesign Package (SNAC-Pack)2026-06-04T15:47:52ZNeural architecture search (NAS) is a powerful approach for automating model design, but existing methods often optimize for accuracy alone or rely on proxy metrics such as bit operations (BOPs) that correlate poorly with hardware cost. This gap is particularly large for FPGA deployment, where cost is dominated by a multi-dimensional budget of lookup tables, DSPs, flip-flops, BRAM, and latency. We present the Surrogate Neural Architecture Codesign Package (SNAC-Pack), an open-source AutoML framework for hardware-aware neural architecture codesign and end-to-end FPGA deployment. SNAC-Pack runs a multi-objective global search with Optuna and NSGA-II, loading trials to a shared SQLite store that enables parallel workers across compute nodes. A hardware surrogate model outputs per-trial resource and latency estimates, avoiding the synthesis cost that would otherwise dominate the search loop. A local search stage then applies quantization-aware training (QAT) together with iterative magnitude pruning in a combined compression loop, after which the final model is synthesized to FPGA firmware via the hls4ml Python library. A YAML configuration and an optional agentic frontend let users run the pipeline on new datasets without modifying the framework. We demonstrate SNAC-Pack on jet classification at the Large Hadron Collider and superconducting qubit readout, discovering compact architectures that match or exceed strong baselines on the task metric while reducing FPGA resource utilization and, in the qubit readout case, reducing the design space exploration process from months of manual fine-tuning to hours of automated search.2026-05-15T16:18:43Z15 Pages, 3 Figures, AutoML (International Conference on Automated Machine Learning) 2026Jason WeitzDmitri DemlerBenjamin HawksAaron WangNhan TranJavier Duartehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01777v2Search for the charmonium weak decay $ψ(2S)\to D_s^-π^+ + c.c.$ and $ψ(2S)\to D_s^-ρ^+ + c.c.$2026-06-04T14:02:05ZWe search for the weak decays $ψ(2S)\to D_s^-π^+ + c.c.$ and $ψ(2S)\to D_s^-ρ^+ + c.c.$ for the first time. The search is based on $(2712.4\pm14.3)\times 10^6$ events containing the charmonium state $ψ(2S)$ collected at the center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=3.686\ \rm{GeV}$ with the BESIII detector. This search offers a unique opportunity to test the Standard Model and search for new physics. Since no signal excess above the background is observed, the upper limits on the branching fractions at the 90\% confidence level are set to be $1.4\times 10^{-6}$ and $7.0\times 10^{-6}$ for $ψ(2S)\to D_s^-π^+ + c.c.$ and $ψ(2S)\to D_s^-ρ^+ + c.c.$, respectively.2026-03-02T12:03:20Z BESIII CollaborationM. AblikimM. N. AchasovP. AdlarsonX. C. AiC. S. AkondiR. AlibertiA. AmorosoQ. AnY. H. AnY. BaiO. BakinaY. BanH. -R. BaoX. L. BaoV. BatozskayaK. BegzsurenN. BergerM. BerlowskiM. B. BertaniD. BettoniF. BianchiE. BiancoA. BortoneI. BoykoR. A. BriereA. BrueggemannH. CaiM. H. CaiX. CaiA. CalcaterraG. F. CaoN. CaoS. A. CetinX. Y. ChaiJ. F. ChangT. T. ChangG. R. CheY. Z. CheC. H. ChenChao ChenG. ChenH. S. ChenH. Y. ChenM. L. ChenS. J. ChenS. M. ChenT. ChenW. ChenX. R. ChenX. T. ChenX. Y. ChenY. B. ChenY. Q. ChenZ. K. ChenJ. ChengL. N. ChengS. K. ChoiX. ChuG. CibinettoF. CossioJ. Cottee-MeldrumH. L. DaiJ. P. DaiX. C. DaiA. DbeyssiR. E. de BoerD. DedovichC. Q. DengZ. Y. DengA. DenigI. DenisenkoM. DestefanisF. De MoriX. X. DingY. DingY. DingY. X. DingJ. DongL. Y. DongM. Y. DongX. DongM. C. DuS. X. DuS. X. DuX. L. DuY. Q. DuY. Y. DuanZ. H. DuanP. EgorovG. F. FanJ. J. FanK. X. FanY. H. FanJ. FangJ. FangS. S. FangW. X. FangY. Q. FangL. FavaF. FeldbauerG. FeliciC. Q. FengJ. H. FengL. FengQ. X. FengY. T. FengM. FritschC. D. FuJ. L. FuY. W. FuH. GaoY. GaoY. N. GaoY. N. GaoY. Y. GaoZ. GaoS. GarbolinoI. GarziaL. GeP. T. GeZ. W. GeC. GengE. M. GersabeckA. GilmanK. GoetzenJ. GollubJ. B. GongJ. D. GongL. GongW. X. GongW. GradlS. GramignaM. GrecoM. D. GuM. H. GuC. Y. GuanA. Q. GuoJ. N. GuoL. B. GuoM. J. GuoR. P. GuoX. GuoY. P. GuoZ. GuoA. GuskovJ. GutierrezJ. Y. HanT. T. HanX. HanF. HanischK. D. HaoX. Q. HaoF. A. HarrisC. Z. HeK. K. HeK. L. HeF. H. HeinsiusC. H. HeinzY. K. HengC. HeroldP. C. HongG. Y. HouX. T. HouY. R. HouZ. L. HouH. M. HuJ. F. HuQ. P. HuS. L. HuT. HuY. HuY. X. HuZ. M. HuG. S. HuangK. X. HuangL. Q. HuangP. HuangX. T. HuangY. P. HuangY. S. HuangT. HussainN. HüskenN. in der WiescheJ. JacksonQ. JiQ. P. JiW. JiX. B. JiX. L. JiL. K. JiaX. Q. JiaZ. K. JiaD. JiangH. B. JiangP. C. JiangS. J. JiangX. S. JiangY. JiangJ. B. JiaoJ. K. JiaoZ. JiaoL. C. L. JinS. JinY. JinM. Q. JingX. M. JingT. JohanssonS. KabanaX. L. KangX. S. KangB. C. KeV. KhachatryanA. KhoukazO. B. KolcuB. KopfL. KrögerL. KrümmelY. Y. KuangM. KuessnerX. KuiN. KumarA. KupscW. KühnQ. LanW. N. LanT. T. LeiM. LellmannT. LenzC. LiC. LiC. H. LiC. K. LiC. K. LiD. M. LiF. LiG. LiH. B. LiH. J. LiH. L. LiH. N. LiH. P. LiHui LiJ. S. LiJ. W. LiK. LiK. L. LiL. J. LiLei LiM. H. LiM. R. LiP. L. LiP. R. LiQ. M. LiQ. X. LiR. LiS. LiS. X. LiS. Y. LiShanshan LiT. LiT. Y. LiW. D. LiW. G. LiX. LiX. H. LiX. K. LiX. L. LiX. Y. LiX. Z. LiY. LiY. G. LiY. P. LiZ. H. LiZ. J. LiZ. L. LiZ. X. LiZ. Y. LiC. LiangH. LiangY. F. LiangY. T. LiangG. R. LiaoL. B. LiaoM. H. LiaoY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyA. LimphiratC. C. LinD. X. LinT. LinB. J. LiuB. X. LiuC. LiuC. X. LiuF. LiuF. H. LiuFeng LiuG. M. LiuH. LiuH. B. LiuH. M. LiuHuihui LiuJ. B. LiuJ. J. LiuK. LiuK. LiuK. Y. LiuKe LiuL. LiuL. C. LiuLu LiuM. H. LiuP. L. LiuQ. LiuS. B. LiuT. LiuW. M. LiuW. T. LiuX. LiuX. K. LiuX. L. LiuX. P. LiuX. Y. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. B. LiuZ. A. LiuZ. D. LiuZ. L. LiuZ. Q. LiuZ. Y. LiuX. C. LouH. J. LuJ. G. LuX. L. LuY. LuY. H. LuY. P. LuZ. H. LuC. L. LuoJ. R. LuoJ. S. LuoM. X. LuoT. LuoX. L. LuoZ. Y. LvX. R. LyuY. F. LyuY. H. LyuF. C. MaH. L. MaHeng MaJ. L. MaL. L. MaL. R. MaQ. M. MaR. Q. MaR. Y. MaT. MaX. T. MaX. Y. MaY. M. MaF. E. MaasI. MacKayM. MaggioraS. MaldeQ. A. MalikH. X. MaoY. J. MaoZ. P. MaoS. MarcelloA. MarshallF. M. MelendiY. H. MengZ. X. MengG. MezzadriH. MiaoT. J. MinR. E. MitchellX. H. MoB. MosesN. Yu. MuchnoiJ. MuskallaY. NefedovF. NerlingH. NeuwirthZ. NingS. NisarQ. L. NiuW. D. NiuY. NiuC. NormandS. L. OlsenQ. OuyangS. PacettiX. PanY. PanA. PathakY. P. PeiM. PelizaeusG. L. PengH. P. PengX. J. PengY. Y. PengK. PetersK. PetridisJ. L. PingR. G. PingS. PluraV. PrasadF. Z. QiH. R. QiM. QiS. QianW. B. QianC. F. QiaoJ. H. QiaoJ. J. QinJ. L. QinL. Q. QinL. Y. QinP. B. QinX. P. QinX. S. QinZ. H. QinJ. F. QiuZ. H. QuJ. RademackerC. F. RedmerA. RivettiM. RoloG. RongS. S. RongF. RosiniCh. RosnerM. Q. RuanN. SaloneA. SarantsevY. SchelhaasK. SchoenningM. ScodeggioW. ShanX. Y. ShanZ. J. ShangJ. F. ShangguanL. G. ShaoM. ShaoC. P. ShenH. F. ShenW. H. ShenX. Y. ShenB. A. ShiH. ShiJ. L. ShiJ. Y. ShiM. H. ShiS. Y. ShiX. ShiH. L. SongJ. J. SongM. H. SongT. Z. SongW. M. SongY. X. SongZirong SongS. SosioS. SpataroS. StansilausF. StielerM. StolteS. S SuG. B. SunG. X. SunH. SunH. K. SunJ. F. SunK. SunL. SunR. SunS. S. SunT. SunW. Y. SunY. C. SunY. H. SunY. J. SunY. Z. SunZ. Q. SunZ. T. SunH. TabaharizatoC. J. TangG. Y. TangJ. TangJ. J. TangL. F. TangY. A. TangL. Y. TaoM. TatJ. X. TengJ. Y. TianW. H. TianY. TianZ. F. TianI. UmanE. van der SmagtB. WangB. WangBo WangC. WangC. WangCong WangD. Y. WangH. J. WangH. R. WangJ. WangJ. J. WangJ. P. WangK. WangL. L. WangL. W. WangM. WangM. WangN. Y. WangS. WangShun WangT. WangT. J. WangW. WangW. P. WangX. F. WangX. L. WangX. N. WangXin WangY. WangY. D. WangY. F. WangY. H. WangY. J. WangY. L. WangY. N. WangY. N. WangYaqian WangYi WangYuan WangZ. WangZ. WangZ. L. WangZ. Q. WangZ. Y. WangZiyi WangD. WeiD. J. WEI WeiD. H. WeiH. R. WeiF. WeidnerS. P. WenU. WiednerG. WilkinsonM. WolkeJ. F. WuL. H. WuL. J. WuLianjie WuS. G. WuS. M. WuX. W. WuZ. WuH. L. XiaL. XiaB. H. XiangD. XiaoG. Y. XiaoH. XiaoY. L. XiaoZ. J. XiaoC. XieK. J. XieY. XieY. G. XieY. H. XieZ. P. XieT. Y. XingD. B. XiongC. J. XuG. F. XuH. Y. XuM. XuQ. J. XuQ. N. XuT. D. XuX. P. XuY. XuY. C. XuZ. S. XuF. YanL. YanW. B. YanW. C. YanW. H. YanW. P. YanX. Q. YanY. Y. YanH. J. YangH. L. YangH. X. YangJ. H. YangR. J. YangX. Y. YangY. YangY. H. YangY. H. YangY. M. YangY. Q. YangY. Z. YangZ. Y. YangZ. P. YaoM. YeM. H. YeZ. J. YeJunhao YinZ. Y. YouB. X. YuC. X. YuG. YuJ. S. YuL. W. YuT. YuX. D. YuY. C. YuY. C. YuC. Z. YuanH. YuanJ. YuanJ. YuanL. YuanM. K. YuanS. H. YuanY. YuanC. X. YueYing YueA. A. ZafarF. R. ZengS. H. ZengX. ZengY. J. ZengY. J. ZengY. C. ZhaiY. H. ZhanS. N. ZhangB. L. ZhangB. X. ZhangD. H. ZhangG. Y. ZhangG. Y. ZhangH. ZhangH. ZhangH. C. ZhangH. H. ZhangH. Q. ZhangH. R. ZhangH. Y. ZhangJ. ZhangJ. J. ZhangJ. L. ZhangJ. Q. ZhangJ. S. ZhangJ. W. ZhangJ. X. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Z. ZhangJianyu ZhangJin ZhangL. M. ZhangLei ZhangN. ZhangP. ZhangQ. ZhangQ. Y. ZhangQ. Z. ZhangR. Y. ZhangS. H. ZhangShulei ZhangX. M. ZhangX. Y. ZhangY. ZhangY. ZhangY. T. ZhangY. H. ZhangY. P. ZhangZ. D. ZhangZ. H. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. X. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZh. Zh. ZhangG. ZhaoJ. -P. ZhaoJ. Y. ZhaoJ. Z. ZhaoL. ZhaoL. ZhaoM. G. ZhaoR. P. ZhaoS. J. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoY. L. ZhaoY. P. ZhaoY. X. ZhaoZ. G. ZhaoA. ZhemchugovB. ZhengB. M. ZhengJ. P. ZhengW. J. ZhengW. Q. ZhengX. R. ZhengY. H. ZhengB. ZhongC. ZhongH. ZhouJ. Q. ZhouS. ZhouX. ZhouX. K. ZhouX. R. ZhouX. Y. ZhouY. X. ZhouY. Z. ZhouA. N. ZhuJ. ZhuK. ZhuK. J. ZhuK. S. ZhuL. X. ZhuLin ZhuS. H. ZhuT. J. ZhuW. D. ZhuW. J. ZhuW. Z. ZhuY. C. ZhuZ. A. ZhuX. Y. ZhuangJ. H. Zouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06180v1Vector charmonium(-like) states in the energy range of 4.1-4.6 GeV2026-06-04T13:53:42ZThe spectrum of vector charmonium(-like) states in the 4.1-4.6 GeV energy region exhibits a long-standing tension. While the inclusive $R$-value indicates the presence of only vector charmonia that are usually interpreted as conventional states, exclusive $e^+e^-$ cross sections reveal additional structures whose parameters strongly depend on the observed final states when fitted with Breit-Wigner functions. This puzzling pattern suggests that coupled-channel and threshold effects play an essential role. In this work, we develop a unified coupled-channel framework relevant for the $1^{--}$ resonances in the considered energy region. The framework incorporates the $S$-wave open-charm channels $D\bar{D}_1$, $D^*\bar{D}_1$, and $D^*\bar{D}_2^*$, constrained by heavy-quark spin symmetry, optional bare poles corresponding to quark-model states which may be associated with the $ψ(4160)$ and the $ψ(4415)$, and final-state interaction in the $Z_c$ channels relevant for the three-body final states. We employ several benchmark models based on the constructed framework to perform simultaneous fits to the BESIII data for the cross sections of $e^+e^-\to J/ψπ^+π^-$, $h_cπ^+π^-$, $D\bar{D}^*π$, $D^*\bar{D}^*π$, $J/ψη$, and $χ_{c0}ω$, together with the available invariant-mass distributions that exhibit the $Z_c(3900)$ and $Z_c(4020)$ structures. The models differ in the number of bare seed states and the fitting strategy. We show that even the purely dynamical scheme captures the gross features of all the analyzed distributions. We therefore conclude that the nontrivial behavior of the measured line shapes in the studied energy range can be understood in terms of strong coupled-channel effects with dynamically generated poles. The inclusion of bare compact states leads to a quantitative improvement of the fit quality but does not alter this conclusion.2026-06-04T13:53:42Z58 pages, 14 figures and 8 tablesXiang-Kun DongVadim BaruLeon von DettenFeng-Kun GuoChristoph HanhartTeng JiUlf-G. MeißnerAlexey Nefedievhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06029v1Mountain Muography for China Jinping Underground Laboratory2026-06-04T11:22:14ZThe China Jinping Underground Laboratory (CJPL), located $\sim 2,400$~m beneath Jinping Mountain, is one of the world's deepest and largest ($\sim 300{,}000~\mathrm{m}^3$) underground facilities, hosting dark matter, nuclear astrophysics, and neutrino experiments. We report the first muon radiography (muography) conducted at this extraordinary depth. Cosmic muons detected by a one-ton prototype developed for the Jinping Neutrino Experiment were used to perform non-invasive subsurface density mapping over a 3~km lateral range. The 1.3~m diameter detector provides nearly isotropic acceptance and an angular resolution of $\sim 4.5^\circ$. By correlating the predicted surface muon flux distributions with the underground measurements, we reconstruct a directional opacity map that constrains the density structure of the overburden and shows excellent agreement with satellite-derived terrain models. This work demonstrates the feasibility of muography at extreme depths with kilometer-scale overburden and establishes a robust methodology for future geophysical applications and large-scale facilities, such as the full Jinping Neutrino Experiment. Based on this validated overburden model, we further predict the total muon fluxes for the eight experimental halls in CJPL-II, providing essential input for their physics programs.2026-06-04T11:22:14ZXinshun ZhangShaomin ChenWei DouHaoyang FuLei GuoZiyi GuoXiangPan JiJianmin LiJinjing LiBo LiangYe LiangQian LiuWentai LuoMing QiWenhui ShaoHaozhe SunJian TangYuyi WangZhe WangChangxu WeiJun WengYiyang WuBenda XuChuang XuTong XuTao XueHaoyan YangYuzi YangAiqiang ZhangBin ZhangYang ZhangZhicai ZhangLin ZhaoYangheng Zheng