https://arxiv.org/api//MQ0Yi0VaPT4NRinK8eP5WA1ppw 2026-06-14T17:38:38Z 60385 570 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06768v1 2026-05-07T18:00:00Z

We introduce an unbinned method for extracting the CKM angle $γ$ from the decay chain $B^\pm \to (D \to K_S π^+ π^-) K^\pm$ using normalizing flows (NFs). The NFs, trained on $D$ decay data, learn a faithful continuous representation of the amplitude and strong phase variation over the $D\to K_Sπ^+π^-$ Dalitz plot whose fidelity improves with increased data sample sizes. With this input, the $B$ decay data can be used to extract the parameters $r_B$, $δ_B$, and $γ$. We test the method on Monte Carlo generated data, where it successfully recovers the injected value of $γ$ within uncertainties. The present implementation propagates statistical uncertainties from finite training data via an ensemble of independently trained flows, and does not attempt to capture the effects of systematic experimental errors. We explore two versions of the method that differ in how the trigonometric constraint on phase variation is encoded, and comment on the possible extension to Bayesian NFs, which would provide direct uncertainty estimates on the learned densities without requiring ensemble training.

2026-05-07T18:00:00Z 35 pages, 11 figures Yuval Grossman Tony Menzo Stefan Schacht Chinhsan Sieng Jure Zupan http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06600v1 2026-05-07T17:22:19Z

The IceCube Upgrade, an extension designed to enhance the IceCube Neutrino Observatory's detection of neutrinos with energies between 1 GeV and 500 GeV, will markedly improve IceCube's sensitivity to low-mass dark matter scenarios. In this study, we present sensitivity projections for the IceCube Upgrade to neutrino fluxes arising from dark matter annihilation. In particular, we consider dark matter with masses between 3 GeV to 500 GeV from both the core of the Sun and the Galactic Center. These projections indicate that the IceCube Upgrade will enable stringent limits on dark matter in this parameter space, achieving leading sensitivities to some dark matter models with only three years of data taking.

2026-05-07T17:22:19Z R. Abbasi M. Ackermann J. Adams J. A. Aguilar M. Ahlers J. M. Alameddine S. Ali N. M. Amin K. Andeen C. Argüelles Y. Ashida S. Athanasiadou S. N. Axani R. Babu X. Bai A. Balagopal V. S. W. Barwick V. Basu R. Bay J. J. Beatty J. Becker Tjus P. Behrens J. Beise C. Bellenghi S. Benkel S. BenZvi D. Berley E. Bernardini D. Z. Besson E. Blaufuss L. Bloom S. Blot F. Bontempo J. Y. Book Motzkin C. Boscolo Meneguolo S. Böser O. Botner J. Böttcher J. Braun B. Brinson Z. Brisson-Tsavoussis R. T. Burley D. Butterfield K. Carloni J. Carpio N. Chau Y. C. Chen Z. Chen D. Chirkin S. Choi A. Chubarov B. A. Clark G. H. Collin D. A. Coloma Borja A. Connolly J. M. Conrad D. F. Cowen C. De Clercq J. J. DeLaunay D. Delgado T. Delmeulle S. Deng P. Desiati K. D. de Vries G. de Wasseige T. DeYoung J. C. Díaz-Vélez S. DiKerby T. Ding M. Dittmer A. Domi L. Draper L. Dueser D. Durnford K. Dutta M. A. DuVernois T. Ehrhardt L. Eidenschink A. Eimer C. Eldridge P. Eller E. Ellinger D. Elsässer R. Engel H. Erpenbeck W. Esmail S. Eulig J. Evans P. A. Evenson K. L. Fan K. Fang K. Farrag A. R. Fazely A. Fedynitch N. Feigl C. Finley D. Fox A. Franckowiak S. Fukami P. Fürst J. Gallagher E. Ganster A. Garcia M. Garcia E. Genton L. Gerhardt A. Ghadimi C. Glaser T. Glüsenkamp J. G. Gonzalez S. Goswami A. Granados D. Grant S. J. Gray S. Griffin K. M. Groth D. Guevel C. Günther P. Gutjahr C. Ha A. Hallgren L. Halve F. Halzen L. Hamacher M. Handt K. Hanson J. Hardin A. A. Harnisch P. Hatch A. Haungs J. Häußler K. Helbing J. Hellrung B. Henke L. Hennig F. Henningsen L. Heuermann R. Hewett N. Heyer S. Hickford A. Hidvegi C. Hill G. C. Hill R. Hmaid K. D. Hoffman A. Hollnagel D. Hooper S. Hori K. Hoshina M. Hostert W. Hou M. Hrywniak T. Huber K. Hultqvist K. Hymon A. Ishihara W. Iwakiri M. Jacquart S. Jain O. Janik M. Jansson M. Jin N. Kamp D. Kang W. Kang A. Kappes L. Kardum T. Karg A. Karle A. Katil M. Kauer J. L. Kelley M. Khanal A. Khatee Zathul A. Kheirandish T. Kim H. Kimku F. Kirchner J. Kiryluk C. Klein S. R. Klein Y. Kobayashi S. Koch A. Kochocki R. Koirala H. Kolanoski T. Kontrimas L. Köpke C. Kopper D. J. Koskinen P. Koundal M. Kowalski T. Kozynets A. Kravka N. Krieger T. Krishnan K. Kruiswijk E. Krupczak A. Kumar E. Kun N. Kurahashi C. Lagunas Gualda L. Lallement Arnaud M. J. Larson F. Lauber J. P. Lazar K. Leonard DeHolton A. Leszczyńska C. Li J. Liao C. Lin Q. R. Liu Y. T. Liu M. Liubarska C. Love L. Lu F. Lucarelli W. Luszczak Y. Lyu M. Macdonald E. Magnus Y. Makino E. Manao S. Mancina A. Mand I. C. Mariş S. Marka Z. Marka L. Marten I. Martinez-Soler R. Maruyama J. Mauro F. Mayhew F. McNally K. Meagher A. Medina M. Meier Y. Merckx L. Merten J. Mitchell L. Molchany S. Mondal T. Montaruli R. W. Moore Y. Morii A. Mosbrugger D. Mousadi E. Moyaux T. Mukherjee M. Nakos U. Naumann L. Neste M. Neumann H. Niederhausen M. U. Nisa K. Noda A. Noell A. Novikov A. Obertacke V. O'Dell A. Olivas R. Orsoe J. Osborn E. O'Sullivan B. Owens V. Palusova H. Pandya A. Parenti N. Park V. Parrish E. N. Paudel L. Paul C. Pérez de los Heros T. Pernice T. C. Petersen J. Peterson S. Pick M. Plum A. Pontén V. Poojyam B. Pries R. Procter-Murphy G. T. Przybylski L. Pyras C. Raab J. Rack-Helleis N. Rad M. Ravn K. Rawlins Z. Rechav A. Rehman I. Reistroffer E. Resconi C. D. Rho W. Rhode L. Ricca B. Riedel A. Rifaie E. J. Roberts S. Rodan M. Rongen A. Rosted C. Rott T. Ruhe L. Ruohan D. Ryckbosch J. Saffer D. Salazar-Gallegos P. Sampathkumar A. Sandrock G. Sanger-Johnson M. Santander S. Sarkar M. Scarnera M. Schaufel H. Schieler S. Schindler L. Schlickmann B. Schlüter F. Schlüter N. Schmeisser T. Schmidt A. Scholz F. G. Schröder S. Schwirn S. Sclafani D. Seckel L. Seen M. Seikh S. Seunarine P. A. Sevle Myhr R. Shah S. Shah S. Shefali N. Shimizu B. Skrzypek R. Snihur J. Soedingrekso D. Soldin P. Soldin G. Sommani D. Song C. Spannfellner G. M. Spiczak C. Spiering J. Stachurska M. Stamatikos T. Stanev T. Stezelberger T. Stürwald T. Stuttard G. W. Sullivan I. Taboada S. Ter-Antonyan A. Terliuk A. Thakuri M. Thiesmeyer W. G. Thompson J. Thwaites S. Tilav K. Tollefson J. A. Torres S. Toscano D. Tosi K. Upshaw A. Vaidyanathan N. Valtonen-Mattila J. Valverde J. Vandenbroucke T. Van Eeden N. van Eijndhoven L. Van Rootselaar J. van Santen J. Vara F. Varsi M. Venugopal M. Vereecken S. Vergara Carrasco S. Verpoest D. Veske A. Vijai J. Villarreal C. Walck A. Wang E. H. S. Warrick C. Weaver P. Weigel A. Weindl J. Weldert A. Y. Wen C. Wendt J. Werthebach M. Weyrauch N. Whitehorn C. H. Wiebusch D. R. Williams L. Witthaus G. Wrede X. W. Xu J. P. Yanez Y. Yao E. Yildizci S. Yoshida R. Young F. Yu S. Yu T. Yuan S. Yun-Cárcamo A. Zander Jurowitzki A. Zegarelli S. Zhang Z. Zhang P. Zhelnin P. Zilberman C. Zilleruelo Cañas http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06567v1 2026-05-07T16:59:46Z

In this paper we revisit, from a different perspective, a long-standing question: ``Is the systematic deficit observed in all branching ratios mediated by a $b\to s μμ$ transition due to New Physics, or to a hypothetical constant unknown universal hadronic contribution that mimics New Physics?'' The key observation that allows us to distinguish between these two possibilities is that non-perturbative contributions associated with $c\bar c$ loops affect inclusive $B\to X_s \ell\ell$ and exclusive $B\to K^{(*)}\ell\ell$ modes differently. In inclusive decays, factorizable contributions are exactly determined from data on $e^+e^-\to \mathrm{hadrons}$, while non-factorizable corrections are described by resolved-photon contributions at low $q^2$ and by local power corrections at high $q^2$. In exclusive decays, by contrast, hypothetical charming-penguin effects, beyond those already included in current uncertainty estimates, could appear, in a worst-case scenario, as a constant, universal contribution that it seems, in principle, indistinguishable from genuine New Physics. We identify two observables, constructed from ratios of exclusive to inclusive modes, that can discriminate between a New Physics contribution and a constant hadronic contribution. Moreover, these ratios can be measured directly by LHCb, as they do not require any normalisation to $J/ψK^{(*)}$ branching fractions from B factories. A preliminary evaluation of these observables with present data shows some preference for the New Physics interpretation. In a complementary test, a comparison between inclusive measurements and the corresponding sum of exclusive modes at high $q^2$ similarly disfavours an explanation based on a constant hadronic contribution. Finally, we provide projections for the new observables based on expected LHCb and Belle II measurements in the near future.

2026-05-07T16:59:46Z 24 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables P. Alvarez-Cartelle B. Capdevila E. Lunghi J. Matias http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06559v1 2026-05-07T16:53:53Z

The singlet axial form factor of the nucleon provides essential input for a complete understanding of the nucleon axial structure. Together with the isovector and isoscalar octet channels, in the forward limit it forms the basis for a full flavor decomposition of the proton spin. In this work we present a lattice QCD determination of the singlet axial form factor $G^{u+d+s}_A(Q^2)$ and related strange contribution $G^{s}_A(Q^2)$ using a set of $N_f = 2 + 1$ CLS gauge ensembles with $O(a)$-improved Wilson fermions, with a full error budget for the extrapolation to the chiral, continuum and infinite-volume limits. Particular focus is placed on the treatment of the disconnected contributions, which constitute the crucial element for the extraction of the strange component. Together with determinations of the isovector and isoscalar octet axial form factors, this work provides a comprehensive lattice QCD determination of the nucleon axial structure across different flavor channels.

2026-05-07T16:53:53Z 14 pages, 8 figures, 5 tables; prepared for submission to PRD Alessandro Barone Dalibor Djukanovic Georg von Hippel Harvey B. Meyer Konstantin Ottnad Hartmut Wittig http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14587v3 2026-05-07T16:02:13Z

Charged Higgs-boson pair production at hadron colliders yields information about the trilinear couplings involving charged Higgs fields in extensions of the Standard Model (SM). We consider the type-I two-Higgs doublet model (2HDM) extension and obtain next-to-leading order QCD predictions for the charged-Higgs pair production ($H^+H^-$ production). All production modes, i.e. Drell--Yan-like production, gluon fusion and vector-boson fusion are included in the analysis. We determine uncertainties originating from the scale dependence, the parton-density functions and strong coupling $α_s$ at the LHC. We observe that the QCD corrections lead to a significant reduction of the relative scale dependences. These improved predictions will allow for a quantitative interpretation of experimental measurements, in case that charged Higgs states will be observed.

2025-12-16T16:56:21Z 28 pages, 18 figures, contribution to Report 5 of the LHCHWG, extended discussion based on SciPost referee feedback Mohamed Ahmed Lisa Biermann Harald Ita Irina Rusetski Michael Spira Yelyzaveta Yedelkina http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06753v1 2026-05-07T15:59:11Z

Based on (2712.4+-14.3)*10^{6} psi(3686) events collected with the BESIII detector, the decays Xi(1530)^{-} to Xi^{0} pi^{-} and Xi(1530)^{-} to Xi^{-} pi^{0} are investigated jointly via the process psi(3686) to anti-Xi^{+} Xi(1530)^{-} + c.c. Under the assumption of isospin symmetry, the two decay modes are treated as fully correlated, and we report the first measurement of their absolute branching fractions. The results are B(Xi(1530)^{-} to Xi^{0} pi^{-})=(61.4+-4.5+-4.6)% and B(Xi(1530)^{-} to Xi^{-} pi^{0}) =(29.7+-2.2+-2.2)%. The combined branching fraction of the two decays is B(Xi(1530)^{-} to (Xi pi)^{-})=(91.1+-6.7+-6.8)%, with uncertainties accounting for the correlations between the two modes. Here, the first uncertainties are statistical, while the second are systematic. Additionally, we update the branching fraction of the decay psi(3686) to anti-Xi^{+} Xi(1530)^{-} + c.c. The updated measurement is B(psi(3686) to anti-Xi^{+} Xi(1530)^{-} + c.c.)=(8.67+-0.52+-0.58+-0.57)*10^{-6}, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic related to event selection and the fit model, and the third is associated with the interference effect.

2026-05-07T15:59:11Z BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai C. S. Akondi R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. H. An Y. Bai O. Bakina H. -R. Bao X. L. Bao M. Barbagiovanni V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann D. Cabiati H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen W. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori E. Di Fiore X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding Yi. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Shaoxu Du X. L. Du Y. Q. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang Jin Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng L. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Yunong Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. Gollub J. B. Gong J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo H. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez J. Y. Han T. T. Han X. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Y. X. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji L. K. Jia X. Q. Jia D. Jiang H. B. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao L. C. L. Jin S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana X. L. Kang X. S. Kang B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger L. Krümmel Y. Y. Kuang M. Kuessner X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li Chunkai Li Cong Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li H. P. Li Hui Li J. N. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li M. T. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. L. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat C. C. Lin C. X. Lin D. X. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu Kun Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu T. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. P. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Yi Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. L. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. X. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma Y. M. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Maity S. Malde Q. A. Malik H. X. Mao Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti X. Pan Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus G. L. Peng H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad L. Pöpping F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi M. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas M. Schernau K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi Ch. Y. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi M. H. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S. Stansilaus F. Stieler M. Stolte S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun H. Tabaharizato C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang Z. H. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian I. Uman E. van der Smagt B. Wang Bin Wang Bo Wang C. Wang Chao Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang H. J. Wang H. R. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang Mi Wang N. Y. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang T. J. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Yanning Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Zhi Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei D. J. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner H. R. Wen S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. W. Wu Z. Wu H. L. Xia L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing D. B. Xiong C. J. Xu G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan Y. Y. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang X. Y. Yang Y. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. M. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Youhua Yang Z. Y. Yang Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Yongchao Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan Jie Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang Gengyuan Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang Han Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang Jin Zhang Jiyuan Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang Q. Z. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang S. N. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Yu Zhang Z. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang Zhilong Zhang Ziyang Zhang Ziyu Zhang G. Zhao J. -P. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao Lei Zhao M. G. Zhao R. P. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. P. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng W. Q. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. X. Zhu Lin Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang M. Zhuge J. H. Zou J. Zu http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06401v1 2026-05-07T15:10:52Z

The interpretation of the SN1987A neutrino data continues to be hindered by significant absolute timing uncertainties and a well-known tension in the angular distributions. We perform a quantitative, high-precision alignment of the Kamiokande-II and Baksan data with the IMB clock, using for the first time the relative time offset (RTO) and reducing the temporal uncertainty by two orders of magnitude to the sub-second level. The chi-square analysis shows that Baksan's absolute timestamps require an advancement of 30.4 s, while those of Kamiokande-II require a delay of about 6.4 s. The knowledge of the unified timeline provides a necessary and rigorous basis for testing whether the first Kamiokande-II event arose from the neutronization burst - a possibility motivated by its angular properties. Our analysis favors an accretion phase electron anti-neutrino origin over a neutronization-burst origin, with a likelihood ratio of 3-6, depending on the specific MSW oscillation scenario. This result corroborates the standard interpretation - that only inverse beta decay events were detected. Our framework yields the most stringent constraints to date on the SN1987A chronology and establishes a precision benchmark for future Galactic supernova observations.

2026-05-07T15:10:52Z 14 pages, 4 figures Riccardo Maria Bozza Vigilante di Risi Veronica Oliviero Giulia Ricciardi Francesco Vissani http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18953v2 2026-05-07T14:51:48Z

We introduce a model-independent framework to reinterpret Belle II results using only public data, analytically reconstructing the mapping between true and reconstructed kinematic variables within the statistically dominant Inclusive Tagging Analysis. This enables rare-decay measurements to probe light invisible particles -- such as the QCD axion or axion-like particles, collectively denoted $a$ -- without relying on internal simulations. Applying the method to $B^+ \! \to \! K^+ ν\barν$ yields the strongest bound on the branching fraction for $B^+ \! \to \! K^+ a$, improving existing limits by about a factor of nine and constraining the axion's fundamental flavour-changing coupling to $b$ and $s$ quarks. The approach establishes $B^+ \! \to \! K^+ ν\barν$ as a dual probe -- simultaneously testing short-distance new physics and light invisible states, the two probes working independently to an excellent approximation -- and provides a general strategy for model-independent reinterpretation of collider data.

2025-10-21T18:00:00Z 10 pages, 6 figures. Matches journal version Merna Abumusabh Giulio Dujany Diego Guadagnoli Axel Iohner Claudio Toni 10.1103/nw6q-6nhz http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03740v2 2026-05-07T14:18:18Z

We identify an overlooked Wess--Zumino--Witten structure in the hidden-local-symmetry~(HLS) formulation of vector mesons. The newly identified term generically leads to the topological quantization of the vector-meson anomalous couplings. If confirmed experimentally, this structure would expose the gauge nature of vector mesons in the anomalous sector and single out HLS over matter-field descriptions. The observed success of vector-meson dominance in anomalous interactions can then be explained by topological-action saturation of the odd-intrinsic-parity processes. Precision measurements of $η^{(\prime)}\toπ^+π^-γ^*$ form factors at BESIII and the Super $τ$-Charm Facility can directly test this saturation picture.

2026-01-07T09:29:39Z 5 pages, 2 figures Chao-Qiang Geng Chia-Wei Liu Yue-Liang Wu http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13759v2 2026-05-07T13:57:34Z

The angular distributions of Drell-Yan lepton pairs provide sensitive probes of the underlying dynamics of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) effects in vector-boson production. This paper presents for the first time the measurement of the full set of angular coefficients together with the differential cross-section as a function of the transverse momentum of the $W$ boson, in the full phase space of the decay leptons. The measurements are performed separately for the $W^-$ and $W^+$ channels. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider in 2017 and 2018, during special low-luminosity runs with a reduced number of interactions per bunch crossings (pile-up). The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of 338 pb$^{-1}$ at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV. The low pile-up environment provides excellent experimental conditions for high-precision measurements of $W$-boson production. All results agree with theoretical predictions incorporating finite-order QCD corrections up to order $α_S^2$.

2025-09-17T07:15:57Z 53 pages in total, author list starting page 36, 17 figures, 1 table, published in EPJC. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/STDM-2020-07 Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (2026) 483 The ATLAS Collaboration 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15264-w http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19952v2 2026-05-07T13:16:20Z

A novel machine-learning-based flavor-tagging algorithm combining same-side and opposite-side tagging is used to obtain the equivalent of 27$\,$000 tagged B$^0_\mathrm{s}$ $\to$ J/$ψ\, φ$(1020) decays from pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ $=$ 13 TeV, collected by the CMS experiment and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 96.5 fb$^{-1}$. A time- and flavor-dependent angular analysis of the $μ^+μ^-$K$^+$K$^-$ final state, consistent with a $φ$(1020) $\to$ K$^+$K$^-$ decay, is used to measure parameters of the $\mathrm{B}^0_\mathrm{s}-\overline{\mathrm{B}}^0_\mathrm{s}$ system. The weak phase is measured to be $φ_\mathrm{s}$ = $-$73 $\pm$ 22 (stat) $\pm$ 10 (syst) mrad, which, combined with the $\sqrt{s}$ $=$ 8 TeV CMS result, gives $φ_\mathrm{s}$ = $-$75 $\pm$ 23 mrad. This value differs from zero by 3.2 standard deviations, providing the first evidence for mixing-induced $CP$ violation in B$^0_\mathrm{s}$ $\to$ J/$ψ\,φ$(1020) decays. All measured physics parameters are found to agree with standard model predictions where available.

2024-12-27T23:21:20Z Replaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/BPH-23-004 (CMS Public Pages) Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (2026) 181801 CMS Collaboration 10.1103/ctqx-vxrj http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21207v2 2026-05-07T13:02:52Z

The Power over Fiber (PoF) technology delivers electrical power by transmitting laser light through a lightweight, non-conductive fiber optic cable to a remote photovoltaic optical converter, which in turn powers sensors or electrical devices. Among the several advantages offered by this solution are spark-free operation in the presence of electric fields, elimination of noise induced by power lines, immunity to electromagnetic interference, and high robustness in hostile environments. The R\&D for the application of PoF in cryogenic environments started at FNAL and BNL (USA) in 2020 to power the Photon Detection System of the DUNE Vertical Drift module. This paper presents the results obtained in the framework of Cryo-PoF project where we developed a single-laser input line system to power an electronic amplifier and the photosensors at cryogenic temperatures. Unlike the DUNE solution, our system allows tuning of the photosensor bias by adjusting the input laser power. We also demonstrate the operation of the optical converter at temperatures down to 4.6 K, opening the possibility of using this technology in a much broader range of applications.

2025-12-24T14:37:49Z A. Andreani C. Brizzolari E. J. Cristaldo Morales M. J. Delgado Gonzalez A. Falcone N. Gallice C. Gotti M. Lazzaroni L. Meazza G. Pessina D. Santoro F. Terranova M. Torti V. Trabattoni http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08907v2 2026-05-07T12:47:34Z

Minimal Flavor Violation (MFV) provides a compelling framework for exploring physics beyond the Standard Model, in which new QCD-singlet fields transforming under the global $\mathrm{SU}(3)^3$ quark flavor symmetry can naturally be stable and act as dark matter (DM) candidates. We show that the DM-MFV framework naturally accommodates the excess in either $K^+ \to π^+ ν\barν$ or $B^+ \to K^+ ν\barν$, while a unified explanation of both channels simultaneously cannot be achieved within a minimal setup containing only a single dark matter multiplet with nearly degenerate masses. Overall, our findings underscore the intricate interplay between MFV-based model building, flavored dark matter scenarios, and precision flavor experiments, highlighting flavored dark matter as a framework that is both theoretically robust and experimentally testable.

2026-01-13T19:00:01Z 26 pages, 2 figures. Matched to the published version Federico Mescia Shohei Okawa Joel Swallow Claudio Toni 10.1103/7dlz-bwlz http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03063v2 2026-05-07T12:24:30Z

Pairwise Fisher graphs capture local covariance information, but they cannot distinguish an irreducible multi-observable radiation pattern from a collection of ordinary pairwise correlations. We show that this missing structure is naturally supplied by higher-order Fisher tensors. In a finite basis of binned EECs, ECFs, or EFPs, and in the natural exponential-family coordinates generated by that basis, the same local tensor has three equivalent interpretations: a coefficient in the local Kullback-Leibler expansion, a connected cumulant of the chosen correlator observables, and a signed weight on a hyperedge linking those observables. This gives an exact Fisher-correlator-hypergraph triality in the local exponential-family embedding. The triality provides a direct construction of physics-informed hypergraphs from correlator data. Extending the quadratic Fisher matrix to the first non-trivial higher tensor identifies genuinely connected multi-observable radiation patterns, supplies hyperedge weights for higher-order Laplacians and message passing, and gives a principled criterion for compressing observable bases beyond pairwise information. We develop these constructions and spell out why the exact cumulant interpretation is special to natural exponential-family coordinates. We illustrate the framework in four applications. In a minimal local-KL study, the cubic Fisher tensor reduces the KL truncation error and isolates the dominant triplet structure. In a two-versus-three prong jet substructure benchmark, the hypergraph selector improves compressed-basis classification. In a 33-observable basis-design problem, the Fisher hypergraph retains more third-order local response at twelve observables. A low-capacity learning benchmark then shows how the same Fisher hyperedges can be used as an interpretable inductive bias for message passing on correlator observables.

2026-05-04T18:33:01Z 31 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables Aritra Bal Markus Klute Benedikt Maier Michael Spannowsky http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12649v3 2026-05-07T10:50:40Z

The ultra-rare decay $K^+\toπ^+ν\barν$ is a golden mode in flavor physics. The Standard Model prediction for its branching ratio is below $10^{-10}$. This decay mode is highly sensitive to new physics models at mass scales up to $\mathcal{O}(100\,\mathrm{TeV})$. The NA62 experiment at CERN SPS is designed to measure this decay mode. A preliminary result of the branching ratio measurement using data collected in 2023--2024 is presented. With the new dataset, the NA62 experiment doubled its signal sample while reducing the background in proportion. Combining the data collected in 2016--2024, the branching ratio is measured to be $\mathcal{B}(K^+\toπ^+ν\barν) = \left(9.6^{+1.9}_{-1.8}\right)\times10^{-11}$. The result is compatible with the Standard Model prediction with a precision better than $20\%$.

2026-04-14T12:19:01Z 6 pages, 5 figures, contribution to the 2026 Electroweak session of the 60th Rencontres de Moriond Xiafei Chang Laboratoire de Physique des Hautes Energies, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland for the NA62 Collaboration