https://arxiv.org/api/SBr0rr1cp+ZWkGKjbeEMfVEkUL82026-06-14T14:47:23Z6038552515http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10243v1Electroweak physics and long-lived particles at LHCb2026-05-11T09:17:28ZExtensions of the Standard Model (SM) of Particle Physics can be probed either through precision measurements of SM observables or via direct searches for processes beyond the SM (BSM). This proceeding focuses on precision measurements in the electroweak sector, in particular the properties of the $Z$ boson, $W$ boson and top quark. Measurements of the $W$ and $t$ production cross-sections, as well as charge asymmetries, with an integrated luminosity of 5.1 and 5.4 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions collected by the LHCb experiment, are presented for the first time. In consequence of the forward coverage of the LHCb detector, these results provide complementary probes on parton distribution functions compared to measurements performed at central rapidity. Well-motivated BSM candidates include mediators between the visible and dark sectors. In this context, recent results from searches for axion-like particles and heavy neutral leptons are also discussed.2026-05-11T09:17:28ZContribution to the 2026 Electroweak session of the 60th Rencontres de MoriondFelicia Volleon behalf of the LHCb Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10221v1TeV-scale neutrino cross-section measurement using upward through-going muons in Super-Kamiokande2026-05-11T09:00:54ZNeutrinos provide a unique probe of both particle physics and the high-energy universe, traversing astronomical distances with minimal interaction. Their charged-current scattering cross section encodes fundamental information about weak interactions and nucleon structure across a vast energy range, yet measurements at TeV energies remain sparse. Here we report the first determination of the flux-averaged muon neutrino and anti-neutrino charged-current total cross section using high-energy atmospheric neutrinos observed in Super-Kamiokande. Using 3989 upward through-going muon events collected over 4269 days, together with a Bayesian fit to atmospheric flux and detector simulations, we measure the flux-averaged charged-current cross section in the 500-5000 GeV range to be $σ/E_ν=(0.51\pm 0.11)\times 10^{-38}$ cm$^2$GeV$^{-1}$, with the highest precision to date in the TeV regime. Our results are consistent with accelerator-based measurements at lower energies and collider-based measurements at higher energies, bridging a critical gap between accelerator experiments and neutrino telescopes. This work demonstrates the capability of large underground detectors to perform precision cross-section measurements with atmospheric neutrinos, opening a new window for probing Standard Model physics and potential new physics searches at multi-TeV energies.2026-05-11T09:00:54Z9 pages, 5 figures, 2 tablesN. BhuiyanK. AbeY. AsaokaM. HaradaY. HayatoK. HiraideT. H. HungK. IekiM. IkedaJ. KamedaY. KanemuraY. KataokaS. MikiS. MineM. MiuraS. MoriyamaK. NakagiriM. NakahataS. NakayamaY. NoguchiG. PronostK. SatoH. SekiyaR. ShinodaM. ShiozawaY. SuzukiA. TakedaY. TakemotoH. TanakaT. YanoS. ChenY. ItowT. KajitaR. NishijimaK. OkumuraT. TashiroT. TomiyaX. WangP. FernandezF. J. de Garay ArconesL. LabargaD. SamudioB. ZaldivarC. YanagisawaB. JargowskyE. KearnsJ. MirabitoL. WanT. WesterB. W. PointonJ. BianB. CortezN. J. GriskevichY. JiangM. B. SmyH. W. SobelV. TakhistovA. YankelevichJ. HillD. H. MoonR. G. ParkB. S. YangK. ScholbergC. W. WalterO. DrapierA. ErshovaM. FereyE. Le BlévecTh. A. MuellerP. PaganiniC. QuachR. RoglyT. NakamuraJ. S. JangR. P. LitchfieldL. N. MachadoF. J. P. SolerJ. G. LearnedK. ChoiS. CaoL. H. V. AnthonyN. W. ProuseM. ScottY. UchidaV. BerardiN. F. CalabriaM. G. CatanesiN. OspinaE. RadicioniA. LangellaG. De RosaG. CollazuolM. FeltreM. MattiazziL. LudoviciM. GoninL. PérisséB. QuilainM. FukazawaS. HoriuchiA. KawabataM. KobayashiY. M. LiuY. MaekawaY. NishimuraA. OkaR. AkutsuM. FriendT. HasegawaY. HinoT. IshidaT. KobayashiT. MatsubaraT. NakadairaY. OyamaA. Portocarrero YreyK. SakashitaT. SekiguchiG. T. BurtonF. Di LodovicoT. KatoriR. KralikN. LathamR. M. RamsdenV. SiccardiS. AoyamaH. BanbaraY. InabaH. ItoM. NishigamiT. SoneA. T. SuzukiY. TakeuchiS. WadaH. ZhongJ. FengL. FengS. HanJ. HikidaJ. R. HuZ. HuM. KawaueT. KikawaT. NakayaT. V. NgocR. A. WendellS. J. JenkinsN. McCauleyA. TarrantM. FanìM. J. WilkingZ. XieY. FukudaH. MenjoY. YoshiokaJ. LagodaM. MandalJ. ZalipskaM. MoriJ. JiangY. AsanoK. HamaguchiH. IshinoY. KoshioF. NakanishiS. OhshitaT. TadaT. IshizukaG. BarrD. BarrowL. CookS. SamaniD. WarkA. HolinF. NovaM. JoS. JungJ. YooJ. E. P. FannonL. KnealeT. PeacockP. StowellH. OkazawaS. M. LakshmiS. HongE. KwonM. W. LeeJ. W. SeoI. YuY. AshidaA. K. IchikawaK. D. NakamuraS. AbeS. GotoS. KodamaY. KongH. HayasakiY. MasakiY. MizunoT. MuroK. NakagiriY. NakajimaM. SekiyamaN. TaniuchiT. YamazumiM. YokoyamaP. de PerioS. FujitaC. Jesús-VallsK. MartensLl. MartiA. D. SantosK. M. TsuiM. R. VaginsS. IzumiyamaM. KuzeR. MatsumotoR. AsakaC. IseM. IshitsukaM. SugoM. WakoK. YamauchiY. NakanoF. CormierR. GaurM. HartzA. KonakaX. LiB. R. SmithersS. ChenY. WuB. D. XuA. Q. ZhangB. ZhangH. AdhikaryM. GirgusP. GovindarajM. Posiadala-ZezulaY. S. PrabhuS. B. BoydR. EdwardsD. HadleyM. O'FlahertyB. RichardsA. AliB. JamiesonC. BronnerD. HoriguchiA. MinaminoY. SasakiR. ShibayamaR. Shimamurahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10023v1Search for invisible decays of light mesons via $J/ψ\to VP$ $(V=ω/φ,P=η/η')$ decays at STCF2026-05-11T05:46:09ZWe present a preliminary feasibility study of searches for invisible decays of light mesons via $J/ψ\to VP$ $(V=ω/φ,P=η/η')$ using a traditional analytical method at the proposed Super $τ$-Charm facility (STCF) which is expected to accumulate $3.4\times10^{12}$ $J/ψ$ events per year, based on an inclusive Monte Carlo sample of $1.3 \times 10^{9}$ $J/ψ$ events. The upper limits on the invisible decay branching fractions at the 90\% confidence level are set as $\mathcal{B}(ω\to invisible) < 3.7 \times 10^{-7}$, $\mathcal{B}(φ\to invisible) < 8.9 \times 10^{-7}$, $\mathcal{B}(η\to invisible) < 1.8 \times 10^{-7}$ and $\mathcal{B}(η' \to invisible) < 4.1 \times 10^{-7}$, respectively, using a projected toy data corresponding to the expected STCF statistics. By using the machine learning technique such as Deep Learning, the upper limit may be further improved to approach theoretical predictions for light dark matter.2026-05-11T05:46:09Z11 pages, 8 figures, Proceedings of FTCF 2025Zhibo TaoYihang XiaVindhyawasini PrasadXu GaoWeimin Songhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22383v3Complete one-loop QED corrections to $D_s^+$ leptonic decays and impact on the CKM unitarity test2026-05-11T03:51:39ZRecently, a violation of the CKM unitarity condition has been reported in the latest charm-meson data and the latest lattice results, once the universal electroweak correction is taken into account. In this article, we analytically derive for the first time the complete one-loop electroweak (EW) and QED corrections to the $D_{s}^+ \to \ell^+ ν_\ell$ decays for $\ell = μ, τ$. Our analysis incorporates both short-distance EW-QED corrections, which are beyond the leading-logarithmic approximation (the so-called Sirlin factor), and long-distance soft-photon corrections depending on the maximum total energy of undetected photons with their resummation. Although the inclusive photon QED corrections to the meson leptonic decays are well known, they do not match the actual measurement circumstances in $D_s^+ \to μ^+ ν_μ$. We find $ |V_{cs}|_{D_s} = 0.991 \pm 0.007 $ from the latest data on $D_s^+$ leptonic decays. We show that properly including these radiative corrections is essential to bring the second-column CKM unitarity tests into agreement with the Standard Model expectation. The study emphasizes that the current limiting factor in confirming CKM unitarity is the precision of QED corrections, and it points out that improving lattice simulations, taking the QED corrections into account, would be desirable for a more robust confirmation.2025-11-27T12:15:09Z39 pages, 14 figures, 1 table; v2: minor updates; v3: references added, version published in JHEPJHEP 05 (2026) 041Teppei KitaharaJun MiyamotoKota Sasaki10.1007/JHEP05(2026)041http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09881v1Dissecting Jet-Tagger Through Mechanistic Interpretability2026-05-11T02:11:47ZMechanistic interpretability seeks to reverse engineer a trained neural network by identifying the minimal subset of internal components. We perform a mechanistic interpretability analysis of the Particle Transformer architecture, trained on the Top Quark Tagging reference dataset, with the goal of identifying the computational circuit responsible for jet classification and characterizing the physical content of its internal representations. Combining zero ablation, path patching with two complementary on-manifold corruption strategies and linear probing of the residual stream, we identify a sparse six-head circuit that recovers the great majority of the full model performance while admitting a clean source-relay-readout interpretation. In this circuit, a single early layer head serves as the primary causal source, a cluster of middle-layer heads acts as relays selectively attending to hard pairwise substructure and a single late-layer head reads out the aggregated signal. Linear probes show that the residual stream is preferentially aligned with the energy correlator basis over the $N$-subjettiness basis. Within the energy correlator basis, the model preferentially encodes 2-prong substructure observables over the 3-prong observables. A per-layer trained probe further reveals that the apparent single step commitment of the model to a classification decision in the first class attention block is in fact a basis rotation, with the discriminating signal already saturating in the particle attention stack. These results demonstrate that mechanistic interpretability methods developed for natural language models can be used for jet physics classifiers and indicate that gradient descent may rediscover physically meaningful aspects of jet tagging without supervision.2026-05-11T02:11:47Z40 pages, 14 figures, 12 tables. Comments are welcomeSaurabh RaiSanmay Gangulyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26890v2Baryon-antibaryon photoproduction cross sections off the proton2026-05-10T22:05:23ZThe GlueX experiment at Jefferson Lab has observed $p\bar{p}$ and, for the first time, $Λ\barΛ$ and $p\barΛ$ photoproduction from a proton target at photon energies up to 11.6 GeV. The angular distributions are forward peaked for all produced pairs, consistent with Regge-like $t$-channel exchange. Asymmetric wide-angle anti-baryon distributions show the presence of additional processes. In a phenomenological model, we find consistency with a double $t$-channel exchange process where anti-baryons are created only at the middle vertex. The model matches all observed distributions with a small number of free parameters. In the hyperon channels, we observe a clear distinction between photoproduction of the $Λ\barΛ$ and $p\barΛ$ systems but general similarity to the $p\bar{p}$ system. We report both total cross sections and cross sections differential with respect to momentum transfer and the invariant masses of the created particle pairs. No narrow resonant structures were found in these reaction channels. The suppression of $s\bar{s}$ quark pairs relative to $d\bar{d}$ quark pairs is similar to what has been seen in other reactions.2025-10-30T18:00:23Z34 pages, 29 figures, 7 tables, 1 algorithmPhys. Rev. C 113, 045207 (2026) GlueX CollaborationF. AfzalM. AlbrechtM. AmaryanS. ArrigoV. ArroyaveA. AsaturyanA. AustregesiloZ. BaldwinF. BarbosaJ. BarlowE. BarrigaR. BarsottiD. BartonV. BaturinV. V. BerdnikovA. BergerW. BoeglinM. BoerW. J. BriscoeT. BrittonR. BrunnerS. CaoC. ChenE. ChudakovG. ChungP. L. ColeO. CortesV. CredeM. M. DaltonD. DarulisA. DeurL. DietrichS. DobbsA. DolgolenkoM. DuggerR. DzhygadloD. EbersoleM. EdoH. EgiyanP. EugenioA. FabriziC. FanelliS. FangM. FritschS. FurletovL. GanH. GaoA. GardnerA. GasparianD. I. GlazierC. GleasonB. GrubeJ. GuoJ. HernandezK. HernandezN. HerrmannN. D. HoffmanD. HornidgeG. M. HuberP. HurckW. ImoehlD. G. IrelandM. M. ItoI. JaegleN. S. JarvisT. JeskeM. JingR. T. JonesV. KakoyanG. KalicyX. KangV. KhachatryanC. KourkoumelisA. LaDukeI. LarinD. LawrenceD. I. LerschH. LiB. LiuK. LivingstonL. LorentiV. LyubovitskijH. MarukyanV. MatveevM. McCaughanM. McCrackenC. A. MeyerR. MiskimenR. E. MitchellP. MoranL. NgE. NissenS. OrešićA. I. OstrovidovZ. PapandreouL. PentchevK. J. PetersL. Puthiya VeetilS. RakshitJ. ReinholdA. RemingtonJ. RitmanG. RodriguezK. SaldanaS. SchadmandA. M. SchertzK. ScheuerA. SchmidtR. A. SchumacherJ. SchwieningM. ScottN. SeptianP. SharpV. J. ShenX. ShenM. R. ShepherdJ. SikesH. SinghA. SmithE. S. SmithA. SomovS. SomovJ. R. StevensI. I. StrakovskyB. SumnerK. SureshV. V. TarasovS. TaylorA. TeymurazyanA. ThielM. ThomsonT. ViducicT. WhitlatchY. WunderlichB. YuJ. ZarlingZ. ZhangX. ZhouB. Zihlmann10.1103/h197-l9dwhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12472v4Novel method to indirectly reconstruct neutrinos in collider experiments2026-05-10T20:36:03ZNeutrinos play a crucial role in particle physics, but cannot be tracked in collider experiments. If more than one neutrino is present in a collision event, it is impossible to extract neutrinos' information using any of the traditional methods. In this Letter, we introduce an innovative inclusive-tagging scheme that is capable of capturing the four-momentum of an undetected particle on the signal side, such as a neutrino, $K_L^0$, etc., in collider experiments. This is the first proposed solution to the longstanding challenge outlined above. Our scheme, based on an asymptotically recursive vector sequence, has the potential to catalyze a significant transformation in the reconstruction techniques for (semi-)leptonic decays of collider experiments. The application and development of this scheme will greatly improve the precision of measurements of Standard Model parameters in the (semi-)leptonic sector with the same data samples, and could play a pivotal role in the search for new physics. Additionally, the asymptotically recursive (vector) sequence introduced in our scheme might also have promising applications in other fields, such as machine learning.2024-08-22T15:11:16Z3 figuresHongrong QiPaoti Changhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09694v1Measurement of branching fractions of $D^+_s\to K^0_SK^0_S π^+π^0$ and $D^+_s\to K^0_S K^+π^0π^0$2026-05-10T18:28:53ZBy analyzing $e^+e^-$ collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 7.33~fb$^{-1}$ collected with the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies ranging from 4.128 to 4.226~GeV, we report the observations of the hadronic decays $D^+_s\to K^0_SK^0_Sπ^+π^0$ and $D^+_s\to K^0_S K^+π^0π^0$. Their decay branching fractions are determined to be ${\mathcal B}(D^+_s\to K^0_SK^0_S π^+π^0)=(4.08\pm0.46_{\rm stat}\pm0.45_{\rm syst})\times 10^{-3}$ and ${\mathcal B}(D^+_s\to K^0_S K^+π^0π^0)=(3.32\pm0.64_{\rm stat}\pm0.31_{\rm syst})\times 10^{-3}$, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic.2026-05-10T18:28:53Z BESIII CollaborationM. AblikimM. N. AchasovP. AdlarsonX. C. AiR. AlibertiA. AmorosoQ. AnY. BaiO. BakinaY. BanH. -R. BaoV. BatozskayaK. BegzsurenN. BergerM. BerlowskiM. B. BertaniD. BettoniF. BianchiE. BiancoA. BortoneI. BoykoR. A. BriereA. BrueggemannH. CaiM. H. CaiX. CaiA. CalcaterraG. F. CaoN. CaoS. A. CetinX. Y. ChaiJ. F. ChangT. T. ChangG. R. CheY. Z. CheC. H. ChenChao ChenG. ChenH. S. ChenH. Y. ChenM. L. ChenS. J. ChenS. M. ChenT. ChenX. R. ChenX. T. ChenX. Y. ChenY. B. ChenY. Q. ChenZ. K. ChenJ. C. ChengL. N. ChengS. K. ChoiX. ChuG. CibinettoF. CossioJ. Cottee-MeldrumH. L. DaiJ. P. DaiX. C. DaiA. DbeyssiR. E. de BoerD. DedovichC. Q. DengZ. Y. DengA. DenigI. DenisenkoM. DestefanisF. De~MoriX. X. DingY. DingY. X. DingJ. DongL. Y. DongM. Y. DongX. DongM. C. DuS. X. DuS. X. DuX. L. DuY. Y. DuanZ. H. DuanP. EgorovG. F. FanJ. J. FanY. H. FanJ. FangJ. FangS. S. FangW. X. FangY. Q. FangL. FavaF. FeldbauerG. FeliciC. Q. FengJ. H. FengL. FengQ. X. FengY. T. FengM. FritschC. D. FuJ. L. FuY. W. FuH. GaoY. GaoY. N. GaoY. N. GaoY. Y. GaoZ. GaoS. GarbolinoI. GarziaL. GeP. T. GeZ. W. GeC. GengE. M. GersabeckA. GilmanK. GoetzenJ. D. GongL. GongW. X. GongW. GradlS. GramignaM. GrecoM. D. GuM. H. GuC. Y. GuanA. Q. GuoJ. N. GuoL. B. GuoM. J. GuoR. P. GuoX. GuoY. P. GuoA. GuskovJ. GutierrezT. T. HanF. HanischK. D. HaoX. Q. HaoF. A. HarrisC. Z. HeK. L. HeF. H. HeinsiusC. H. HeinzY. K. HengC. HeroldP. C. HongG. Y. HouX. T. HouY. R. HouZ. L. HouH. M. HuJ. F. HuQ. P. HuS. L. HuT. HuY. HuZ. M. HuG. S. HuangK. X. HuangL. Q. HuangP. HuangX. T. HuangY. P. HuangY. S. HuangT. HussainN. HüskenN. in der WiescheJ. JacksonQ. JiQ. P. JiW. JiX. B. JiX. L. JiX. Q. JiaZ. K. JiaD. JiangH. B. JiangP. C. JiangS. J. JiangX. S. JiangY. JiangJ. B. JiaoJ. K. JiaoZ. JiaoS. JinY. JinM. Q. JingX. M. JingT. JohanssonS. KabanaN. Kalantar-NayestanakiX. L. KangX. S. KangM. KavatsyukB. C. KeV. KhachatryanA. KhoukazO. B. KolcuB. KopfM. KuessnerX. KuiN. KumarA. KupscW. KühnQ. LanW. N. LanT. T. LeiM. LellmannT. LenzC. LiC. LiC. H. LiC. K. LiD. M. LiF. LiG. LiH. B. LiH. J. LiH. L. LiH. N. LiHui LiJ. R. LiJ. S. LiJ. W. LiK. LiK. L. LiL. J. LiLei LiM. H. LiM. R. LiP. L. LiP. R. LiQ. M. LiQ. X. LiR. LiS. X. LiShanshan LiT. LiT. Y. LiW. D. LiW. G. LiX. LiX. H. LiX. K. LiX. L. LiX. Y. LiX. Z. LiY. LiY. G. LiY. P. LiZ. H. LiZ. J. LiZ. X. LiZ. Y. LiC. LiangH. LiangY. F. LiangY. T. LiangG. R. LiaoL. B. LiaoM. H. LiaoY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyA. LimphiratD. X. LinL. Q. LinT. LinB. J. LiuB. X. LiuC. X. LiuF. LiuF. H. LiuFeng LiuG. M. LiuH. LiuH. B. LiuH. H. LiuH. M. LiuHuihui LiuJ. B. LiuJ. J. LiuK. LiuK. LiuK. Y. LiuKe LiuL. LiuL. C. LiuLu LiuM. H. LiuP. L. LiuQ. LiuS. B. LiuW. M. LiuW. T. LiuX. LiuX. K. LiuX. L. LiuX. Y. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. B. LiuZ. A. LiuZ. D. LiuZ. Q. LiuZ. Y. LiuX. C. LouH. J. LuJ. G. LuX. L. LuY. LuY. H. LuY. P. LuZ. H. LuC. L. LuoJ. R. LuoJ. S. LuoM. X. LuoT. LuoX. L. LuoZ. Y. LvX. R. LyuY. F. LyuY. H. LyuF. C. MaH. L. MaHeng MaJ. L. MaL. L. MaL. R. MaQ. M. MaR. Q. MaR. Y. MaT. MaX. T. MaX. Y. MaY. M. MaF. E. MaasI. MacKayM. MaggioraS. MaldeQ. A. MalikH. X. MaoY. J. MaoZ. P. MaoS. MarcelloA. MarshallF. M. MelendiY. H. MengZ. X. MengG. MezzadriH. MiaoT. J. MinR. E. MitchellX. H. MoB. MosesN. Yu. MuchnoiJ. MuskallaY. NefedovF. NerlingZ. NingS. NisarQ. L. NiuW. D. NiuY. NiuC. NormandS. L. OlsenQ. OuyangS. PacettiX. PanY. PanA. PathakY. P. PeiM. PelizaeusH. P. PengX. J. PengY. Y. PengK. PetersK. PetridisJ. L. PingR. G. PingS. PluraV. PrasadF. Z. QiH. R. QiM. QiS. QianW. B. QianC. F. QiaoJ. H. QiaoJ. J. QinJ. L. QinL. Q. QinL. Y. QinP. B. QinX. P. QinX. S. QinZ. H. QinJ. F. QiuZ. H. QuJ. RademackerC. F. RedmerA. RivettiM. RoloG. RongS. S. RongF. RosiniCh. RosnerM. Q. RuanN. SaloneA. SarantsevY. SchelhaasK. SchoenningM. ScodeggioW. ShanX. Y. ShanZ. J. ShangJ. F. ShangguanL. G. ShaoM. ShaoC. P. ShenH. F. ShenW. H. ShenX. Y. ShenB. A. ShiH. ShiJ. L. ShiJ. Y. ShiS. Y. ShiX. ShiH. L. SongJ. J. SongM. H. SongT. Z. SongW. M. SongY. X. SongZirong SongS. SosioS. SpataroS StansilausF. StielerS. S SuG. B. SunG. X. SunH. SunH. K. SunJ. F. SunK. SunL. SunR. SunS. S. SunT. SunW. Y. SunY. C. SunY. H. SunY. J. SunY. Z. SunZ. Q. SunZ. T. SunC. J. TangG. Y. TangJ. TangJ. J. TangL. F. TangY. A. TangL. Y. TaoM. TatJ. X. TengJ. Y. TianW. H. TianY. TianZ. F. TianI. UmanB. WangB. WangBo WangC. WangC. WangCong WangD. Y. WangH. J. WangJ. WangJ. J. WangJ. P. WangK. WangL. L. WangL. W. WangM. WangM. WangN. Y. WangS. WangS. WangT. WangT. J. WangW. WangW. P. WangX. WangX. F. WangX. L. WangX. N. WangXin WangY. WangY. D. WangY. F. WangY. H. WangY. J. WangY. L. WangY. N. WangY. N. WangYaqian WangYi WangYuan WangZ. WangZ. WangZ. L. WangZ. Q. WangZ. Y. WangZiyi WangD. WeiD. H. WeiH. R. WeiF. WeidnerS. P. WenU. WiednerG. WilkinsonM. WolkeJ. F. WuL. H. WuL. J. WuL. J. WuLianjie WuS. G. WuS. M. WuX. WuY. J. WuZ. WuL. XiaB. H. XiangD. XiaoG. Y. XiaoH. XiaoY. L. XiaoZ. J. XiaoC. XieK. J. XieY. XieY. G. XieY. H. XieZ. P. XieT. Y. XingC. F. XuC. J. XuG. F. XuH. Y. XuM. XuQ. J. XuQ. N. XuT. D. XuX. P. XuY. XuY. C. XuZ. S. XuF. YanL. YanW. B. YanW. C. YanW. H. YanW. P. YanX. Q. YanH. J. YangH. L. YangH. X. YangJ. H. YangR. J. YangY. YangY. H. YangY. Q. YangY. Z. YangZ. P. YaoM. YeM. H. YeZ. J. YeJunhao YinZ. Y. YouB. X. YuC. X. YuG. YuJ. S. YuL. W. YuT. YuX. D. YuY. C. YuY. C. YuC. Z. YuanH. YuanJ. YuanJ. YuanL. YuanM. K. YuanS. H. YuanY. YuanC. X. YueYing YueA. A. ZafarF. R. ZengS. H. ZengX. ZengY. J. ZengY. J. ZengY. C. ZhaiY. H. Zhan ZhangB. L. ZhangB. X. ZhangD. H. ZhangG. Y. ZhangG. Y. ZhangH. ZhangH. ZhangH. C. ZhangH. H. ZhangH. Q. ZhangH. R. ZhangH. Y. ZhangJ. ZhangJ. J. ZhangJ. L. ZhangJ. Q. ZhangJ. S. ZhangJ. W. ZhangJ. X. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Z. ZhangJianyu ZhangL. M. ZhangLei ZhangN. ZhangP. ZhangQ. ZhangQ. Y. ZhangR. Y. ZhangS. H. ZhangShulei ZhangX. M. ZhangX. Y. ZhangY. ZhangY. ZhangY. T. ZhangY. H. ZhangY. P. ZhangZ. D. ZhangZ. H. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. X. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Z. ZhangZh. Zh. ZhangG. ZhaoJ. Y. ZhaoJ. Z. ZhaoL. ZhaoL. ZhaoM. G. ZhaoS. J. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoY. L. ZhaoY. X. ZhaoZ. G. ZhaoA. ZhemchugovB. ZhengB. M. ZhengJ. P. ZhengW. J. ZhengX. R. ZhengY. H. ZhengB. ZhongC. ZhongH. ZhouJ. Q. ZhouS. ZhouX. ZhouX. K. ZhouX. R. ZhouX. Y. ZhouY. X. ZhouY. Z. ZhouA. N. ZhuJ. ZhuK. ZhuK. J. ZhuK. S. ZhuL. ZhuL. X. ZhuS. H. ZhuT. J. ZhuW. D. ZhuW. J. ZhuW. Z. ZhuY. C. ZhuZ. A. ZhuX. Y. ZhuangJ. H. ZouJ. Zuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09682v1Spin-flavor entanglement in $Λ_b \to ΛD$ and weak phase extraction2026-05-10T18:00:01ZWe identify a new spin-flavor entanglement structure in $Λ_b\toΛD$ decays, formed by the correlation between the $Λ$ spin and the $D$ flavor states ($D=D^0,\overline D^0,D_1,D_2$). The entanglement information is encoded in the decay rates and Lee-Yang parameters of the four neutral-$D$ modes. We then show that the same spin-flavor structure provides a new method to determine the weak phase $γ$, a key angle of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa unitarity triangle. We find that the experimental uncertainty scales as $σ_γ\propto 1/{\cal C}$, where ${\cal C}$ is the Wootters concurrence, thereby quantitatively relating the precision of the weak-phase extraction to the amount of spin-flavor entanglement.2026-05-10T18:00:01Z5 pages, 3 figuresYong DuChao-Qiang GengXiao-Gang HeChia-Wei LiuSheng-Lin LiuXin-Yi Liuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01435v2Simulation of the CYGNO Gaseous TPC Optical Readout2026-05-10T15:49:28ZGaseous Time Projection Chambers with Optical Readout are sensitive detectors suitable for 3D measurement of low-energy O(1 keV) particles and are proposed for detecting rare events such as Dark Matter particle interactions. The CYGNO collaboration is developing such a detector with a high spatial and energy resolution, leveraging an innovative optical readout system. A reliable simulation of the detector response is needed to properly assess the physics reach of this technique and to better understand the performance of the detector in the development phase. Such a simulation cannot entirely rely on existing software packages; indeed, none of the available tools is capable of properly and reliably treating the different phenomena occurring in the detector, from the primary interaction in the gas volume throughout the whole detector response model, including charge transport, light production and propagation, and the response of the optical sensors. In this paper, we present a modeling of the detector response tuned on the CYGNO Optical TPC case; a description of the method is reported together with comparisons with experimental data from the LIME prototype to demonstrate the simulation performances.2026-01-04T08:42:30ZF. D. AmaroR. AntoniettiE. BaracchiniL. BenussiS. BiancoC. CapocciaM. CaponeroL. G. M de CarvalhoG. CavotoI. A. CostaA. CroceM. D'AstolfoG. D'ImperioG. DhoE. Di MarcoJ. M. F. dos SantosD. FiorinaF. IacoangeliZ. IslamE. KempH. P. LimaG. MaccarroneR. D. P. ManoD. J. G. MarquesG. MazzitelliP. MeloniA. MessinaC. M. B. MonteiroR. A. NobregaI. F. PainsE. PaolettiF. PetrucciS. PiacentiniD. PierluigiD. PinciF. RengaA. RussoG. SavianoP. A. O. C. SilvaN. J. C. SpoonerR. TesauroS. TomassiniS. TorelliD. Tozzihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09381v1Probing the nature of $D_1 K$ and $D_2 K$ molecules through $D_s^{(*)}ππ$ and $D_{s0(s1)}π$ decays2026-05-10T07:12:23ZWe study the two- and three-body decays of the $I=0$ $D_1K$ and $D_2K$ molecular states $T_{c\bar{s}1}^*$ and $T_{c\bar{s}2}^*$ into $D_s^{(*)}$ mesons and pions. Triangle singularities produce narrow peaks in the $D_s^*π$ and $D_sπ$ invariant mass spectra near the $D^*K$ and $DK$ thresholds. The isospin-violating two-body decays $T_{c\bar{s}1}^*\to D_{s1}(2460)π^0$, $T_{c\bar{s}2}^*\to D_{s1}(2460)π^0$, and $T_{c\bar{s}2}^*\to D_{s0}^*(2317)π^0$ exhibit large partial widths, reflecting the strong couplings inherent to molecular states. These predictions, obtained within heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory and the chiral unitary approach, provide complementary signatures for identifying $D_1K$ and $D_2K$ molecules at experiments.2026-05-10T07:12:23Z12 pages, 13 figuresXing-Meng ZhaoLiu-Lin WangYing-Bo HeXiao-Yun WangXiao-Hai Liuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22590v2Short-range production of three bottom mesons2026-05-10T04:55:58ZPrevious investigations of the three-body dynamics of $B$ mesons have shown that no Efimov effect arises in systems composed of three $B$ and $B^*$ mesons. This implies that the properties of such three-body systems can be described reliably within nonrelativistic effective field theory (NREFT) with short-range interactions using only two-body input, as three-body forces are strongly suppressed. In this work, we present leading-order predictions for the three-body point production rates of systems consisting of three $B$ and $B^*$ mesons. These predictions provide a novel way to experimentally probe the $B^{(*)}$-$\bar{B}^{(*)}$ interactions, which play a crucial role in the hadronic-molecule interpretation of the $T_{b\bar{b}1}(10610)$ and $T_{b\bar{b}1}(10650)$ states. Moreover, they provide a way to test the approximate conformal symmetry predicted for such systems at low energies experimentally.2025-11-27T16:23:27Z26 pages, 11 figures; updated to the published versionJHEP 04 (2026) 092Yong-Hui LinHans-Werner HammerUlf-G. Meißner10.1007/JHEP04(2026)092http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23468v2Model-independent mass determination of near-threshold states from short-range production2026-05-10T04:25:23ZWe propose a novel observable for the precision measurements of a wide class of near-threshold dimer states: the short-range production rate of a dimer--spectator two-body system, composed of the given near-threshold state and one of its constituents. Within the framework of nonrelativistic effective field theory, these production rates exhibit characteristic line shapes for the specific partial wave and reach a model-independent minimum. This feature enables a precise extraction of their masses from experimental data, provided that the line shape can be resolved with sufficient accuracy. Applying this novel method to both the $T_{b\bar{b}1}(10610)B$ and $T_{b\bar{b}1}(10650)B^*$ systems allows for a precise determination of the binding energy $δ$ of the $T_{b\bar{b}1}(10610)$ and $T_{b\bar{b}1}(10650)$ via the relation of $δ=-{E_{\text{dip}}^{\text{exp}}}/{0.1983}$ once the respective dip position $E_{\text{dip}}^{\text{exp}}$ is experimentally identified.2025-10-27T16:06:44Z8 pages, 6 figures; updated to the accepted versionPhys. Lett. B 877 (2026) 140417Yong-Hui LinHans-Werner HammerUlf-G. Meißner10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140417http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05694v4Nearly Degenerate Majorana Dark Matter and Its Self-Interactions in a Gauged $U(1)_{L_μ- L_τ}$ Model2026-05-10T03:13:32ZWe propose a model of nearly degenerate Majorana dark matter (DM) in a gauged $U(1)_{L_μ- L_τ}$ extension of the Standard Model. Spontaneous symmetry breaking generates a dominant Majorana mass via a strong Yukawa coupling, splitting the dark fermion into two nearly degenerate states. The lighter state ($χ_-$) is the DM candidate, with an allowed mass of $\sim 10$ GeV to several hundred GeV. Crucially, within the $10 \sim 75$ GeV mass range and a scalar mediator at the tens of MeV scale, this strong coupling dictates the thermal relic abundance and induces significant elastic self-interactions. These self-interactions naturally resolve small-scale structure anomalies, such as the core-cusp problem, while satisfying massive cluster constraints. Furthermore, we place stringent joint constraints on the scalar mass and the Higgs mixing angle $α$ using the latest LZ 2025 direct detection data. The model's gauge boson $Z^\prime$ maintains early-Universe thermal equilibrium and accommodates the muon anomalous magnetic moment $(g-2)_μ$, remaining consistent with updated cosmological and experimental bounds.2025-12-05T13:22:33Z66 pages, 14 figures, 1 table. Major revision: text reorganized, and a new figure (Fig. 8) addedKwei-Chou Yanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09140v1Can a Nonstandard Invisible Pair Mimic the Michel Distribution?2026-05-09T19:52:26ZWe ask whether a measured Michel distribution, apparently in excellent agreement with the Standard Model interpretation of the $\ell_i \to \ell_j ν\barν$ decay, could instead arise from a different invisible sector. Within a general low-energy effective field theory, we analyze lepton decays $\ell_i \to \ell_j + X\bar X$ for electrically neutral, color-singlet, mutually conjugate invisible pairs $X\bar X$ of spin up to $2$, allowing (pseudo)scalar, (axial)vector, and antisymmetric tensor interactions in the lepton current, focusing on the massless limit relevant for exact degeneracies. We formulate a criterion for indistinguishability based on the full set of measurable differential distributions. Under these assumptions, besides the obvious spin $1/2$ case, there is a unique nontrivial solution: a massless complex scalar pair coupled through a purely left-handed vector current exactly reproduces the standard Michel pattern, including its extensions to daughter-lepton polarization and radiative channels. All other cases studied here are distinguishable, in particular because higher-spin invisible pairs produce additional kinematic prefactors. These results isolate the only nonstandard and nontrivial invisible sector that can remain hidden in Michel-type lepton decay measurements.2026-05-09T19:52:26Z5 pagesPablo Roig