https://arxiv.org/api/wMO0Y81mCCsEk8YifUKWU1x40VA2026-06-14T12:37:20Z6038549515http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12123v1Photoproduction of $J/Ψ$ in peripheral Oxygen-Oxygen collisions2026-05-12T13:41:45ZThe photoproduction of $J/Ψ$ in peripheral Oxygen - Oxygen ($OO$) collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is investigated considering distinct assumptions for the modeling of the nuclear photon flux, overlap function and dipole - proton scattering amplitude. Predictions for the associated rapidity distributions and total cross - sections are presented. Our results indicate that the experimental study of the photoproduction of $J/Ψ$ in peripheral $OO$ collisions is, in principle, feasible. In addition, they point out that the combination of the results for this final state in $OO$ collisions with those obtained for $PbPb$ collisions will allow us to derive important constraints on the description of photon - induced process at peripheral collisions.2026-05-12T13:41:45Z15 pages, 4 figures, 4 tablesPedro E. A. da CostaAndré V. GianniniVictor P. GonçalvesBruno D. Moreirahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12089v1Power Studies For Two-Sample and Goodness-of-Fit Methods For Multivariate Data2026-05-12T13:10:26ZWe present the results of a large number of simulation studies regarding the power of various goodness-of-fit as well as non-parametric two-sample tests for multivariate data. In two dimensions this includes both continuous and discrete data, in higher dimensions continuous data only. In general no single method can be relied upon to provide good power, any one method may be quite good for some combination of null hypothesis and alternative and may fail badly for another. Based on the results of these studies we propose a fairly small number of methods chosen such that for any of the case studies included here at least one of the methods has good power. The studies were carried out using the R packages MD2sample and MDgof, available from CRAN.2026-05-12T13:10:26ZWolfgang Rolkehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12081v1Catching UHE Neutrinos with HERON2026-05-12T13:06:41ZThe Hybrid Elevated Radio Observatory for Neutrinos, or HERON, is a newly proposed ultrahigh energy Earth-skimming tau neutrino detector. Ultrahigh energy tau neutrinos which skim the Earth may produce $τ$-leptons which escape into the atmosphere and initiate up-going extensive air showers. The HERON concept consists of 24 compact phased radio arrays, embedded within a larger sparse array of 360 standalone antennas, distributed along a mountain range and designed to capture the radio emission of these up-going extensive air showers. Due to the high elevation observation sites and the long propagation length of radio, HERON achieves a very large instantaneous effective area towards the horizon, and thus excels at the detection of astrophysical transient events such as gamma-ray bursts. With the excellent pointing resolution offered by the sparse array, HERON would be capable of conducting UHE neutrino astronomy and could be incorporated into the broader network of multi-messenger instruments. Here, we detail the HERON concept and describe the science which can be accomplished with it.2026-05-12T13:06:41Zcontribution to the 2026 Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe session of the 60th Rencontres de MoriondAndrew Zeollahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12011v1CaloArt: Large-Patch x-Prediction Diffusion Transformers for High-Granularity Calorimeter Shower Generation2026-05-12T12:00:48ZHigh-granularity calorimeters make ML-based fast shower simulation a high-dimensional generative modeling problem, where voxel-space generators must balance physics fidelity with training and inference cost. This work studies large-patch tokenization with x-prediction, enabling efficient raw voxel generation. We propose CaloArt, a modernized DiT-style backbone with 3D positional encoding and architectural refinements, trained via conditional flow matching with decoupled prediction and loss spaces. On CaloChallenge Dataset 2, where small patch size remains affordable, v-prediction performs well, and CaloArt achieves the best FPD, strongest high-level metrics, and strongest ResNet classifier metrics. On CaloChallenge Dataset 3, the 40500-voxel grid makes large patches necessary; x-prediction improves all reported metrics over v-prediction and places CaloArt on the quality-generation-time Pareto frontier. The final CCD2 and CCD3 models both retain O(10) ms single-GPU generation time, with 9.71 and 11.14 ms per shower. These results support large-patch voxel-space diffusion transformers with x-prediction as a compute-efficient route to high-granularity calorimeter shower synthesis, reducing training and inference cost without a pretrained latent tokenizer.2026-05-12T12:00:48Z30 pages, 8 figuresZhengkun HuangGongxing Sunhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17951v2QCD, electroweak physics, and searches for exotic signatures in the forward region at LHCb2026-05-12T11:24:02ZThe LHCb detector has demonstrated a proven competitiveness across a wide range of physics analyses thanks to its forward coverage. These proceedings describe: i) complementary measurements using heavy flavour jets, ii) Electroweak (EW) measurements with the top and W boson, and iii) searches for New Physics states such as axion-like particles (ALPs), heavy-neutral lepton (HNLs) and B-meson decays to multi-muon final states.2026-04-20T08:31:16ZContribution to the 2026 QCD session of the 60th Rencontres de Moriond. Correction on last plot to meet LHCb collaboration rulesEmilio Xosé Rodríguez Fernándezhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18225v2Constraints on Anomalous Quartic Gauge Couplings via $γγ$ and $Zγ$ Vector Boson Scattering at Muon Colliders2026-05-12T09:36:06ZIn the Standard Model, the couplings between gauge bosons are tightly constrained by the principles of gauge symmetry and renormalizability. However, the presence of anomalous couplings suggests the possibility of new physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). In this study, we focus on the sensitivities of anomalous quartic gauge couplings (aQGCs), specially the dimension-8 operators associated with field-strength tensor structures within the effective field theory (EFT) framework, at future Muon Colliders. Our analysis targets the neutral aQGC-sensitive processes $μ^{+}μ^{-} \to μ^+ γγμ^-$ and $μ^{+} μ^{-} \to μ^+ Z γμ^-$, simulated at center-of-mass energies of 3 TeV and 10 TeV. Signal and background events are generated using {\sc MadGraph5\_aMC@NLO}, interfaced with Pythia8 for parton showering and hadronization, and Delphes for fast detector simulation. A multivariate analysis based on Boosted Decision Trees (BDTs) is employed to enhance signal-to-background discrimination, utilizing a comprehensive set of kinematic and reconstructed observables from the final-state particles. Unitarity is preserved through the application of an energy-dependent clipping procedure within the EFT validity regime. Our findings indicate that future muon colliders offer significant sensitivity improvements over current experimental constraints on aQGCs. Furthermore, a comparison with other future collider scenarios shows that the 10 TeV Muon Collider, even with a 10\% systematic uncertainty, provides substantially stronger projected limits at 95\% confidence level than those currently reported by the ATLAS collaboration at the LHC as well as projected limits by future hadron colliders. These results underscore the enhanced potential of high-energy muon collider to probe new physics in the electroweak sector through precision measurements of aQGCs.2026-02-20T14:04:57Z29 pages, 10 figures, version accepted for publication in JHEPM. TekinA. SenolH. Denizlihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14295v2Towards a Reflective PICOSEC detector?2026-05-12T08:19:28ZPICOSEC is an ultrafast particle-detector concept, combining a photocathode-coated Cherenkov radiator coupled to a gas-avalanche multiplier. Particle-induced Cherenkov photons create photoelectrons emitted from an ultrathin semitransparent photocathode; they are multiplied and detected in fast gas-avalanche mode. In parallel to the constant progress made in the PICOSEC technique, we propose different detector configurations and operation modes with the aim of enhancing robustness and performance. They incorporate thick reflective photocathodes deposited on the readout electrodes of various types of avalanche multipliers. Some of these Reflective-PICOSEC detectors operate at mbar gas pressures.2026-03-15T09:18:06Z16 pages and 6 figuresA. Breskinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11690v1Electro- and photoproduction of muon pairs with $μ$CLAS12: Double Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering, Timelike Compton Scattering, and $J/ψ$ production2026-05-12T07:47:28ZThe CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer for operation at 12 GeV (CLAS12) at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has played a central role in advancing the understanding of nucleon and nuclear structure. As increasingly precise data become available, new physics opportunities emerge that extend beyond the current capabilities of CLAS12. In this article, a program to explore the quark and gluon structure of the nucleon through di-muon electro- and photoproduction is presented. Its primary focus is the measurement of beam-spin asymmetries in Double Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering, $ep \rightarrow e^\prime μ^+ μ^-p^\prime $. By independently varying the incoming and outgoing photon virtualities and momentum transfer, the DDVCS measurement provides access to the Generalized Parton Distributions over their full three-dimensional phase space, extending beyond the kinematic constraints of Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering and Timelike Compton Scattering. In addition, the large acceptance and high luminosity of the $μ$CLAS12 experiment will enable precision measurements of near-threshold $J/ψ$ production and high-statistics studies of Timelike Compton Scattering.2026-05-12T07:47:28ZJ. S. AlvaradoN. BaltzellM. BondiP. ChatagnonR. De VitaM. HoballahV. KubarovskyR. ParemuzyanS. StepanyanP. AchenbachM. ArratiaM. BattaglieriV. BertoneA. BianconiM. E. BoglioneF. BossùG. BraccoF. BzeihS. BueltmannV. BurkertD. S. CarmanT. CaoM. CarpinelliE. CisbaniG. CiulloE. ClineM. ContalbrigoA. D'AngeloN. DashyanS. DiehlM. DefurneL. El FassiL. ElouadrhiriM. FarooqE. FerrandA. FilippiM. FilippiniC. FoglerG. FotiS. FrantzenA. FulciK. GatesD. I. GlazierK. GnanvoS. GrazziM. HattawyF. HauensteinH. S. JoM. KerrA. KripkoL. LanzaP. LenisaX. LiN. LiyanageR. M. MarinaroV. Martínez-FernándezD. MartiryanV. MascagnaM. D. McCaughanB. McKinnonC. MezragR. MilnerM. MirazitaP. MusicoT. NagornaP. Nadel-TuronskiH. NguyenS. NiccolaiM. OsipenkoL. PappalardoC. PaudelN. PilleuxA. PilloniB. PireS. PlavullyL. PolizziR. PerrinoB. RaydoM. RipaniM. RonayetteS. SchadmandA. SchmidtY. G. SharabianE. SidorettiM. SpreaficoI. I. StrakovskyP. SznajderR. TysonM. TaiutiM. UngaroG. UrciuoliS. VallarinoL. VenturelliT. VittoriniE. VoutierA. VossenJ. WagnerY. WangX. WeiN. WuerfelZ. Zhaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22776v3Optimization-based Unfolding in High-Energy Physics2026-05-12T07:45:24ZIn experimental High-Energy Physics, unfolding refers to the problem of estimating the underlying distribution of a physical observable from detector-level data, in the presence of statistical fluctuations and systematic uncertainties. Starting from its reformulation as a regularized quadratic optimization problem, we develop a framework to address unfolding using both classical and quantum-compatible methods. In particular, we derive a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) representation of the unfolding objective, allowing direct implementation on quantum annealing and hybrid quantum-classical solvers. The proposed approach is implemented in QUnfold, an open-source Python package integrating classical mixed-integer solvers and D-Wave's hybrid quantum solver. We benchmark the method against widely used unfolding techniques in RooUnfold, including response Matrix Inversion, Iterative Bayesian Unfolding, and Singular Value Decomposition unfolding, using synthetic dataset with controlled distortion effects. Our results demonstrate that the optimization-based approach achieves competitive reconstruction accuracy across multiple distributions while naturally accommodating regularization within the objective function. This work establishes a unified optimization perspective on unfolding and provides a practical pathway for exploring quantum-enhanced methods in experimental HEP data analysis.2026-02-26T09:11:34ZSimone GasperiniGianluca BiancoMarco LorussoCarla RiegerMichele Grossihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11630v1Long-lived sterile neutrinos from axionlike particles at the Super Tau-Charm Facility2026-05-12T06:55:48ZWe study the search prospect of long-lived heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) pair produced in decays of axionlike particles (ALPs) at the proposed Super Tau-Charm Facility (STCF), focusing on the center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=3.773$ GeV. The ALPs are assumed to originate from $D^\pm$-meson decays in association with a charged pion. We perform both truth-level and detector-level Monte Carlo simulations and obtain the expected sensitivity reach to the mixing parameter between the HNL and the electron neutrino, $|V_{eN}|^2$, with a displaced-vertex search at STCF. We find that STCF can probe values of $|V_{eN}|^2$ about one-to-two orders of magnitude beyond the existing bounds. We also perform an approximate reinterpretation of a search for HNLs at the CHARM experiment, which is subject to model-dependent assumptions on the production and kinematic distributions, and find that beam-dump experiments may provide strong complementary constraints.2026-05-12T06:55:48Z25 pages plus refs, 5 figuresXiaokun LiZeren Simon WangYu ZhangXiaorong Zhouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11580v1Outer Detector of Hyper-Kamiokande2026-05-12T06:04:28ZHyper-Kamiokande (HK) is the world's largest water Cherenkov ring-imaging detector, planning to start data taking in 2028. The Outer Detector (OD) surrounds the Inner Detector and plays a critical role in rejecting background events entering from outside, particularly cosmic-ray muons. We report on the selection of $8\,\mathrm{cm}$ diameter photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) for the OD, comparing Hamamatsu R14374 and NNVT N2031 candidates, and present the evaluation of cosmic-ray muon background reduction performance using a full detector simulation. Hamamatsu PMTs were adopted for their superior in-water detection efficiency in deep-UV and stability. The cosmic-ray muon reduction inefficiency reaches $O(10^{-6})$ with OD-based cuts alone, and $O(10^{-9})$ is expected when combined with fiducial volume cuts, which is sufficiently negligible for nucleon decay and atmospheric neutrino analyses.2026-05-12T06:04:28Z4 pages, contribution to the 2026 Electroweak session of the 60th Rencontres de MoriondR. Shinodaon behalf of the Hyper-Kamiokande Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11464v1Study of $φ\to K\bar{K}$ in the amplitude analysis of $D^{+}\to K_{S}^{0}K_{L}^{0}π^{+}$2026-05-12T03:21:36ZWe present the first amplitude analysis and branching fraction measurement of $D^{+} \rightarrow K_{S}^{0}K_{L}^{0}π^{+}$ decay. The analysis uses a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 20.3~$\rm fb^{-1}$, which was recorded at a center-of-mass energy 3.773~GeV by the BESIII detector. The measured branching fraction is $\mathcal{B}(D^{+} \rightarrow K_{S}^{0}K_{L}^{0}π^{+})=(5.780\pm0.085\pm 0.052)\times10^{-3}$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. Using the known value of ${\cal B}(D^+ \to φπ^+,\,φ\to K^+K^-)$, we determine the relative branching fraction between $φ\to K_{S}^0K_{L}^0$ and $φ\to K^+K^-$ to be $\mathcal{B}(D^{+} \to φπ^{+}, φ\to K_{S}^0K_{L}^0)/\mathcal{B}(D^{+} \to φπ^{+}, φ\to K^+K^-)= 0.628\pm0.022\pm 0.015\pm0.017$, where the third uncertainty is related to $\mathcal{B}(D^{+} \to φπ^{+}, φ\to K^+K^-)$. This result is significantly lower than the previous world average and is consistent with the isospin expectation for the $φ$ meson's coupling to charged and neutral kaon pairs.2026-05-12T03:21:36Z BESIII CollaborationM. AblikimM. N. AchasovP. AdlarsonX. C. AiC. S. AkondiR. AlibertiA. AmorosoQ. AnY. H. AnY. BaiO. BakinaH. R. BaoX. L. BaoM. BarbagiovanniV. BatozskayaK. BegzsurenN. BergerM. BerlowskiM. B. BertaniD. BettoniF. BianchiE. BiancoA. BortoneI. BoykoR. A. BriereA. BrueggemannD. CabiatiH. CaiM. H. CaiX. CaiA. CalcaterraG. F. CaoN. CaoS. A. CetinX. Y. ChaiJ. F. ChangT. T. ChangG. R. CheY. Z. CheC. H. ChenChao ChenG. ChenH. S. ChenH. Y. ChenM. L. ChenS. J. ChenS. M. ChenT. ChenW. ChenX. R. ChenX. T. ChenX. Y. ChenY. B. ChenY. Q. ChenZ. K. ChenJ. ChengL. N. ChengS. K. ChoiX. ChuG. CibinettoF. CossioJ. Cottee-MeldrumH. L. DaiJ. P. DaiX. C. DaiA. DbeyssiR. E. de BoerD. DedovichC. Q. DengZ. Y. DengA. DenigI. DenisenkoM. DestefanisF. De MoriE. Di FioreX. X. DingY. DingY. X. DingYi. DingJ. DongL. Y. DongM. Y. DongX. DongZ. J. DongM. C. DuS. X. DuShaoxu DuX. L. DuY. Q. DuY. Y. DuanZ. H. DuanP. EgorovG. F. FanJ. J. FanY. H. FanJ. FangJin FangS. S. FangW. X. FangY. Q. FangL. FavaF. FeldbauerG. FeliciC. Q. FengJ. H. FengL. FengQ. X. FengY. T. FengM. FritschC. D. FuJ. L. FuY. W. FuH. GaoXu GaoY. GaoY. N. GaoY. Y. GaoYunong GaoZ. GaoS. GarbolinoI. GarziaL. GeP. T. GeZ. W. GeC. GengE. M. GersabeckA. GilmanK. GoetzenJ. GollubJ. B. GongJ. D. GongL. GongW. X. GongW. GradlS. GramignaM. GrecoM. D. GuM. H. GuC. Y. GuanA. Q. GuoH. GuoJ. N. GuoL. B. GuoM. J. GuoR. P. GuoX. GuoY. P. GuoZ. GuoA. GuskovJ. GutierrezJ. Y. HanT. T. HanX. HanF. HanischK. D. HaoX. Q. HaoF. A. HarrisC. Z. HeK. K. HeK. L. HeF. H. HeinsiusC. H. HeinzY. K. HengC. HeroldP. C. HongG. Y. HouX. T. HouY. R. HouZ. L. HouH. M. HuJ. F. HuQ. P. HuS. L. HuT. HuY. HuY. X. HuZ. M. HuG. S. HuangK. X. HuangL. Q. HuangP. HuangX. T. HuangY. P. HuangY. S. HuangT. HussainN. HüskenN. in der WiescheJ. JacksonQ. JiQ. P. JiW. JiX. B. JiX. L. JiY. Y. JiL. K. JiaX. Q. JiaD. JiangH. B. JiangS. J. JiangX. S. JiangY. JiangJ. B. JiaoJ. K. JiaoZ. JiaoL. C. L. JinS. JinY. JinM. Q. JingX. M. JingT. JohanssonS. KabanaX. L. KangX. S. KangB. C. KeV. KhachatryanA. KhoukazO. B. KolcuB. KopfL. KrögerL. KrümmelY. Y. KuangM. KuessnerX. KuiN. KumarA. KupscW. KühnQ. LanW. N. LanT. T. LeiM. LellmannT. LenzC. LiC. H. LiC. K. LiChunkai LiCong LiD. M. LiF. LiG. LiH. B. LiH. J. LiH. L. LiH. N. LiH. P. LiHui LiJ. N. LiJ. S. LiJ. W. LiK. LiK. L. LiL. J. LiL. K. LiLei LiM. H. LiM. R. LiM. T. LiP. L. LiP. R. LiQ. M. LiQ. X. LiR. LiS. LiS. X. LiS. Y. LiShanshan LiT. LiT. Y. LiW. D. LiW. G. LiX. LiX. H. LiX. K. LiX. L. LiX. Y. LiX. Z. LiY. LiY. H. LiY. B. LiY. C. LiY. G. LiY. P. LiZ. H. LiZ. J. LiZ. L. LiZ. X. LiZ. Y. LiC. LiangH. LiangY. F. LiangY. T. LiangZ. Z. LiangG. R. LiaoL. B. LiaoM. H. LiaoY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyA. LimphiratC. C. LinC. X. LinD. X. LinT. LinB. J. LiuB. X. LiuC. LiuC. X. LiuF. LiuF. H. LiuFeng LiuG. M. LiuH. LiuH. B. LiuH. M. LiuHuihui LiuJ. B. LiuJ. J. LiuK. LiuK. Y. LiuKe LiuKun LiuL. LiuL. C. LiuLu LiuM. H. LiuP. L. LiuQ. LiuS. B. LiuT. LiuW. M. LiuW. T. LiuX. LiuX. K. LiuX. L. LiuX. P. LiuX. T. LiuX. Y. LiuY. LiuY. B. LiuYi LiuZ. A. LiuZ. D. LiuZ. L. LiuZ. Q. LiuZ. X. LiuZ. Y. LiuX. C. LouH. J. LuJ. G. LuX. L. LuY. LuY. H. LuY. P. LuZ. H. LuC. L. LuoJ. R. LuoJ. S. LuoM. X. LuoT. LuoX. L. LuoZ. Y. LvX. R. LyuY. F. LyuY. H. LyuF. C. MaH. L. MaHeng MaJ. L. MaL. L. MaL. R. MaQ. M. MaR. Q. MaR. Y. MaT. MaX. T. MaX. Y. MaY. M. MaF. E. MaasI. MacKayM. MaggioraS. MaityS. MaldeQ. A. MalikH. X. MaoY. J. MaoZ. P. MaoS. MarcelloA. MarshallF. M. MelendiY. H. MengZ. X. MengG. MezzadriH. MiaoT. J. MinR. E. MitchellX. H. MoB. MosesN. Yu. MuchnoiJ. MuskallaY. NefedovF. NerlingH. NeuwirthZ. NingS. NisarQ. L. NiuW. D. NiuY. NiuC. NormandS. L. OlsenQ. OuyangI. V. OvtinS. PacettiY. PanA. PathakY. P. PeiM. PelizaeusG. L. PengH. P. PengX. J. PengY. Y. PengK. PetersK. PetridisJ. L. PingR. G. PingS. PluraV. PrasadL. PöppingF. Z. QiH. R. QiM. QiS. QianW. B. QianC. F. QiaoJ. H. QiaoJ. J. QinJ. L. QinL. Q. QinL. Y. QinP. B. QinX. P. QinX. S. QinZ. H. QinJ. F. QiuZ. H. QuJ. RademackerK. RavindranC. F. RedmerA. RivettiM. RoloG. RongS. S. RongF. RosiniCh. RosnerM. Q. RuanN. SaloneA. SarantsevY. SchelhaasM. SchernauK. SchoenningM. ScodeggioW. ShanX. Y. ShanZ. J. ShangJ. F. ShangguanL. G. ShaoM. ShaoC. P. ShenH. F. ShenW. H. ShenX. Y. ShenB. A. ShiCh. Y. ShiH. ShiJ. L. ShiJ. Y. ShiM. H. ShiS. Y. ShiX. ShiH. L. SongJ. J. SongM. H. SongT. Z. SongW. M. SongY. X. SongZirong SongS. SosioS. SpataroS. StansilausF. StielerM. StolteS. S SuG. B. SunG. X. SunH. SunH. K. SunJ. F. SunK. SunL. SunR. SunS. S. SunT. SunW. Y. SunY. C. SunY. H. SunY. J. SunY. Z. SunZ. Q. SunZ. T. SunH. TabaharizatoC. J. TangG. Y. TangJ. TangJ. J. TangL. F. TangY. A. TangZ. H. TangL. Y. TaoM. TatJ. X. TengJ. Y. TianW. H. TianY. TianZ. F. TianK. Yu. TodyshevI. UmanE. van der SmagtB. WangBin WangBo WangC. WangChao WangCong WangD. Y. WangF. K. WangH. J. WangH. R. WangJ. WangJ. J. WangJ. P. WangK. WangL. L. WangL. W. WangM. WangMi WangN. Y. WangP. WangS. WangShun WangT. WangW. WangW. P. WangX. F. WangX. L. WangX. N. WangXin WangY. WangY. D. WangY. F. WangY. H. WangY. J. WangY. L. WangY. N. WangYanning WangYaqian WangYi WangYuan WangZ. WangZ. L. WangZ. Q. WangZ. Y. WangZhi WangZiyi WangD. WeiD. H. WeiD. J. WeiH. R. WeiF. WeidnerH. R. WenS. P. WenU. WiednerG. WilkinsonM. WolkeJ. F. WuL. H. WuL. J. WuLianjie WuS. G. WuS. M. WuX. W. WuZ. WuH. L. XiaL. XiaB. H. XiangD. XiaoG. Y. XiaoH. XiaoY. L. XiaoZ. J. XiaoC. XieK. J. XieY. XieY. G. XieY. H. XieZ. P. XieT. Y. XingD. B. XiongG. F. XuH. Y. XuQ. J. XuQ. N. XuT. D. XuX. P. XuY. XuY. C. XuZ. S. XuF. YanL. YanW. B. YanW. C. YanW. H. YanW. P. YanX. Q. YanY. Y. YanH. J. YangH. L. YangH. X. YangJ. H. YangR. J. YangX. Y. YangY. YangY. G. YangY. H. YangY. M. YangY. Q. YangY. Z. YangYouhua YangZ. Y. YangW. J. YaoZ. P. YaoM. YeM. H. YeZ. J. YeK. YiJunhao YinZ. Y. YouB. X. YuC. X. YuG. YuJ. S. YuL. W. YuT. YuX. D. YuY. C. YuYongchao YuC. Z. YuanH. YuanJ. YuanJie YuanL. YuanM. K. YuanS. H. YuanY. YuanC. X. YueYing YueA. A. ZafarF. R. ZengS. H. ZengX. ZengY. J. ZengYujie ZengY. C. ZhaiY. H. ZhanB. L. ZhangB. X. ZhangD. H. ZhangG. Y. ZhangGengyuan ZhangH. ZhangH. C. ZhangH. H. ZhangH. Q. ZhangH. R. ZhangH. Y. ZhangHan ZhangJ. ZhangJ. J. ZhangJ. L. ZhangJ. Q. ZhangJ. S. ZhangJ. W. ZhangJ. X. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Z. ZhangJianyu ZhangJin ZhangJiyuan ZhangL. M. ZhangLei ZhangN. ZhangP. ZhangQ. ZhangQ. Y. ZhangQ. Z. ZhangR. Y. ZhangS. H. ZhangS. N. ZhangShulei ZhangX. M. ZhangX. Y. ZhangY. T. ZhangY. H. ZhangY. P. ZhangYao ZhangYu ZhangYu ZhangZ. ZhangZ. D. ZhangZ. H. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. X. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZh. Zh. ZhangZhilong ZhangZiyang ZhangZiyu ZhangG. ZhaoJ. -P. ZhaoJ. Y. ZhaoJ. Z. ZhaoL. ZhaoLei ZhaoM. G. ZhaoR. P. ZhaoS. J. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoY. L. ZhaoY. P. ZhaoY. X. ZhaoZ. G. ZhaoA. ZhemchugovB. ZhengB. M. ZhengJ. P. ZhengW. J. ZhengW. Q. ZhengX. R. ZhengY. H. ZhengB. ZhongC. ZhongX. ZhongH. ZhouJ. Q. ZhouS. ZhouX. ZhouX. K. ZhouX. R. ZhouX. Y. ZhouY. X. ZhouY. Z. ZhouA. N. ZhuJ. ZhuK. ZhuK. J. ZhuK. S. ZhuL. X. ZhuLin ZhuS. H. ZhuT. J. ZhuW. D. ZhuW. J. ZhuW. Z. ZhuY. C. ZhuZ. A. ZhuX. Y. ZhuangM. ZhugeJ. H. ZouJ. Zuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09529v2Beam-Dump Ceiling and Its Experimental Implication: The Case of a Portable Experiment2026-05-11T23:24:24ZWe generalize the nature of the so-called beam-dump ``ceiling'' beyond which the improvement on the sensitivity reach in the search for fast-decaying mediators dramatically slows down, and we point out its experimental implications that motivate tabletop-sized beam-dump experiments for the search. Light (bosonic) mediators are well-motivated new-physics particles as they can appear in dark-sector portal scenarios and models to explain various laboratory-based anomalies. Due to their low mass and feebly interacting nature, beam-dump-type experiments, utilizing high-intensity particle beams can play a crucial role in probing the parameter space of such visibly decaying mediators, in particular, the ``prompt-decay'' region, where the mediators feature relatively large coupling and mass. We present a general and semianalytic proof that the ceiling effectively arises in the prompt-decay region of an experiment and show its insensitivity to data statistics, background estimates, and systematic uncertainties, considering a concrete example, the search for axion-like particles interacting with ordinary photons at three benchmark beam facilities: PIP-II at FNAL and SPS and LHC-dump at CERN. We then identify optimal criteria to perform a cost-effective and short-term experiment to reach the ceiling, demonstrating that very short-baseline compact experiments enable access to the parameter space unreachable thus far.2024-01-17T19:00:00Z8 pages, 3 figures, 1 table, journal-accepted versionDoojin KimJaehoon YuJong-Chul ParkHyunyong Kimhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11321v1MeVPrtl: An Event Generator for Dark Sector Particles in the Short-Baseline Neutrino Program2026-05-11T23:14:06ZMeVPrtl is a modular event generator of beyond the Standard Model (BSM) physics particles developed for use in the Short-Baseline Neutrino (SBN) Program. A large class of BSM physics models predict that new particles could be produced in the intense Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) and Neutrinos at the Main Injector (NuMI) beams at Fermilab, travel to the SBN Program detectors, and decay into Standard Model (SM) particles. These new physics models are motivated by dark matter, the neutrino mass scale, and a solution to the strong CP problem. MeVPrtl provides an interface to implement the overlapping phenomenology of these models, and to connect them with meson flux inputs and object outputs used by the SBN Program's LArSoft-based detector simulation. Implementations for the Higgs portal, heavy neutral lepton, and heavy QCD axion models exist within MeVPrtl. In this paper these implementations and their validation, as well as details of the MeVPrtl interface, are specified.2026-05-11T23:14:06Z30 pages, 12 figures ICARUS Collaboration SBND Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11176v1From raw data to neutrino candidates: a neural-network pipeline for Baikal-GVD2026-05-11T19:38:35ZWe present a neural-network-based data processing pipeline for Baikal-GVD, designed to improve event reconstruction quality and accelerate neutrino candidates selection. The pipeline comprises three stages: fast suppression of extensive air shower events, suppression of noise optical modules activations, and extraction of high confidence neutrino candidates. All three networks employ a transformer architecture that exploits inter-hit correlations through the attention mechanism. Applied sequentially, the pipeline achieves orders-of-magnitude speedup over the standard reconstruction chain. Moreover, noise suppression neural network surpasses the accuracy of algorithmic noise suppression algorithms and provides estimate for time residuals of the signal hits, which is crucial for identification of track-like hits. We address the domain shift between Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data by incorporating a domain adaptation technique, demonstrating improved agreement between the two domains. The resulting framework enables near-real-time event classification, with direct applications to multi-messenger alert systems and diffuse neutrino flux measurements.2026-05-11T19:38:35ZA. MatseikoInstitute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyG. PlotnikovInstitute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of SciencesI. KharukInstitute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology