https://arxiv.org/api/wDUmsBgxO11rRqYN/bGBC7JQ1QM2026-03-22T13:12:57Z595274515http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07358v3Experimental review on the chiral magnetic effect in relativistic heavy ion collisions2026-03-17T14:10:57ZThe chiral magnetic effect (CME) refers to a predicted phenomena in quantum chromodynamics that manifests as a charge separation along an external magnetic field, driven by an imbalance of quark chirality. Searches for the CME has been carried out by azimuthal particle correlations in relativistic heavy ion collisions where such a chirality imbalance is anticipated and a strong magnetic field is created in the initial stage. No conclusive experimental evidence on the CME has been established so far because of large background contributions to azimuthal correlation observables. We review the status of the experimental search for the CME, covering the observables used, the techniques to mitigate backgrounds, and the strengths and limitations of various experimental approaches, and outline a future prospect of the CME search in high-energy nuclear collisions.2025-11-10T18:11:37Z29 pages, 12 figures, 2 tables. Invited review for European Physical Journal Special Topics "Exploring Dense Nuclear Matter. Guest editors: Subhasis Chattopadhyay, Peter Senger"Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. (2026)Wei LiQiye ShouFuqiang Wang10.1140/epjs/s11734-026-02225-xhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17557v2Characterization of the quantum state of top quark pairs produced in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV using the beam and helicity bases2026-03-17T13:28:08ZMeasurements of the spin correlation coefficients in the beam basis are presented for top quark-antiquark ($\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$) systems produced in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment in 2016$-$2018, and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ system is reconstructed from final states containing an electron or muon, and jets. Together with the previously reported results in the helicity basis, these measurements are used to decompose the system into the Bell and spin eigenstates in various kinematic regions. The spin correlation coefficients are also used to evaluate properties of the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ quantum state, such as the purity, von Neumann entropy, and entanglement. All results are consistent with standard model predictions.2025-12-19T13:27:24ZReplaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/TOP-25-016 (CMS Public Pages)Phys. Rev. D 113 (2026) L051101 CMS Collaboration10.1103/hkgw-dztkhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16414v1Measurement of the $|V_{cb}|$ element of the CKM matrix in $t\bar{t}$ decays with the ATLAS detector2026-03-17T11:51:23ZThe first measurement of the magnitude of the CKM quark mixing matrix element $|V_{cb}|$ using on-shell $W$-boson decays is presented. The measurement is made with $t\bar{t}$ events from $pp$ collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $140$ fb$^{-1}$ at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. A value of: $$|V_{cb}| = (50^{+11}_{-14})\times10^{-3}$$ is measured, where the uncertainties have roughly equal contributions from the limited size of the data sample and from systematic effects. This is consistent with existing measurements made at much lower energy scales in $B$ hadron decays. While the sensitivity does not yet rival that of previous determinations, this novel approach probes a very different physical situation, namely the rare hadronic $t\rightarrow b\bar{b} c$ decay at high momentum-transfer, rather than semileptonic $B$ decays at low momentum-transfer.2026-03-17T11:51:23Z49 pages in total, author list starting page 32, 7 figures, 3 tables, submitted to JHEP. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/TOPQ-2019-14/ ATLAS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16323v1Puzzles in charmed baryon semileptonic decays2026-03-17T09:56:02ZLarge apparent $SU(3)_F$ breaking and a tension with lattice QCD have recently emerged in semileptonic decays of singly charmed baryons, hinting at either an unexpected hadronic mechanism or new physics. We formulate a framework that systematically matches lattice-QCD inputs onto an $SU(3)_F$ analysis including first-order symmetry breaking. We predict ${\mathcal{B}}(Ξ_c^+\toΣ^0\ell^+ν_\ell)/{\mathcal{B}}(Ξ_c^+\toΞ^0\ell^+ν_\ell)=(2.6\pm0.3)\%,$ and ${\mathcal{B}}(Ξ_c^+\toΛ^0\ell^+ ν_\ell)/{\mathcal{B}}(Ξ_c^+\toΞ^0\ell^+ν_\ell)=(1.1\pm0.1)\%$, whose precise measurements would cleanly determine the origin of the anomalously large $SU(3)_F$ breaking.2026-03-17T09:56:02Z5 pages, 2 figuresChao-Qiang GengChia-Wei LiuSheng-Lin Liuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16293v1Results of the analysis of a survey for young scientists on training quality in HEP instrumentation software and machine learning2026-03-17T09:30:19ZA 2021 study by the ECFA Early-Career Researchers Panel revealed that 71% of 334 respondents used open-source software tools in their instrumentation work, yet 70% reported receiving no training for these tools. In response, the Software and Machine Learning for Instrumentation group was formed in the ECFA Early-Career Researchers Panel to assess the accessibility and quality of training programs in machine learning and software for early-career researchers in experimental and applied physics. This group launched a new survey, reaching 174 participants. This report summarises the survey results in detail, and is intended to serve as a guiding document to improve the training programs that are available to early-career researchers.2026-03-17T09:30:19ZCecilia Borcafor the ECFA ECR PanelJavier Jiménez Peñafor the ECFA ECR PanelDavid Marckxfor the ECFA ECR PanelMalgorzata Niemiecfor the ECFA ECR PanelElisabetta Spadaro Norellafor the ECFA ECR PanelMarta Urbaniakfor the ECFA ECR Panelhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21224v2Measurement of the $CP$ asymmetry in $D^0\toπ^+π^-π^0$ decays at Belle II2026-03-17T08:47:27ZWe measure the time- and phase-space-integrated $CP$ asymmetry $A_{CP}$ in $D^0\toπ^+π^-π^0$ decays reconstructed in $e^+e^-\to c\bar c$ events collected by the Belle II experiment from 2019 to 2022. This sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 428 fb$^{-1}$. We require $D^0$ mesons to be produced in $D^{*+}\to D^0π^+$ decays to determine their flavor at production. Control samples of $D^0\to K^-π^+$ decays are used to correct for reconstruction-induced asymmetries. The result, $A_{CP}(D^0\toπ^+π^-π^0)=(0.29\pm0.27\pm0.13)\%$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic, is the most precise result to date and is consistent with $CP$ conservation.2025-10-24T07:54:14Z13 pages, 7 figures. Published on Physical Review DPhys. Rev. D 113 (2026) 052006 Belle II CollaborationM. AbumusabhI. AdachiL. AggarwalH. AhmedY. AhnH. AiharaN. AkopovS. AlghamdiM. AlhakamiA. AloisioN. AlthubitiK. AmosN. Anh KyD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuH. BaeN. K. BaghelS. BahinipatiP. BambadeSw. BanerjeeM. BarrettM. BartlJ. BaudotA. BeaubienF. BechererJ. BeckerJ. V. BennettF. U. BernlochnerV. BertacchiM. BertemesE. BertholetM. BessnerS. BettariniV. BhardwajB. BhuyanF. BianchiT. BilkaD. BiswasA. BobrovD. BodrovG. BonviciniJ. BorahA. BoschettiA. BozekM. BračkoP. BranchiniR. A. BriereT. E. BrowderA. BudanoS. BussinoQ. CampagnaM. CampajolaG. CasarosaC. CecchiP. ChangP. CheemaL. ChenB. G. CheonC. CheshtaH. ChetriK. ChilikinJ. ChinK. ChirapatpimolH. -E. ChoK. ChoS. -J. ChoS. -K. ChoiS. ChoudhuryJ. A. Colorado-CaicedoI. ConsignyL. CoronaJ. X. CuiS. DasE. De La Cruz-BureloS. A. De La MotteG. De NardoG. De PietroR. de SangroM. DestefanisA. Di CantoZ. DoležalI. Domínguez JiménezT. V. DongX. DongM. DorigoG. DujanyP. EckerD. EpifanovJ. EppeltR. FarkasP. FeichtingerT. FerberT. FillingerC. FinckG. FinocchiaroF. FortiB. G. FulsomA. GabrielliA. GaleE. GanievM. Garcia-HernandezR. GargL. GärtnerG. GaudinoV. GaurV. GautamA. GazA. GellrichG. GhevondyanD. GhoshH. GhumaryanG. GiakoustidisR. GiordanoA. GiriP. Gironella GironellA. GlazovB. GobboR. GodangO. GogotaP. GoldenzweigW. GradlE. GrazianiD. GreenwaldY. GuanK. GudkovaI. HaideY. HanH. HayashiiS. HazraM. T. HedgesA. HeidelbachG. HeineI. Heredia de la CruzM. Hernández VillanuevaT. HiguchiM. HoekM. HohmannR. HoppeP. HorakX. T. HouC. -L. HsuT. HumairT. IijimaN. IpsitaA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiP. JacksonW. W. JacobsD. E. JaffeE. -J. JangS. JiaY. JinA. JohnsonA. B. KaliyarJ. KandraK. H. KangG. KaryanF. KeilC. KetterC. KieslingD. Y. KimJ. -Y. KimK. -H. KimH. KindoK. KinoshitaP. KodyšT. KogaS. KohaniK. KojimaA. KorobovS. KorparE. KovalenkoR. KowalewskiP. KrižanP. KrokovnyT. KuhrY. KuliiD. KumarK. KumaraT. KunigoA. KuzminY. -J. KwonS. LacapraraT. LamL. LanceriJ. S. LangeT. S. LauM. LaurenzaR. LeboucherF. R. Le DiberderH. LeeM. J. LeeC. LemettaisP. LeoP. M. LewisC. LiH. -J. LiL. K. LiQ. M. LiW. Z. LiY. LiY. B. LiY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyJ. LinS. LinZ. LiptakV. LisovskyiM. H. LiuQ. Y. LiuZ. LiuD. LiventsevS. LongoT. LueckC. LyuJ. L. MaY. MaM. MaggioraS. P. MaharanaR. MaitiG. MancinelliR. ManfrediE. ManoniM. MantovanoD. MarcantonioC. MarinasC. MartelliniA. MartensT. MartinovL. MassaccesiM. MasudaD. MatvienkoS. K. MauryaM. MaushartJ. A. McKennaZ. Mediankin GruberováR. MehtaF. MeierD. MeleshkoM. MerolaC. MillerM. MirraK. MiyabayashiH. MiyakeR. MizukG. B. MohantyS. MonetaA. L. Moreira de CarvalhoH. -G. MoserM. MrvarH. MurakamiR. MussaI. NakamuraM. NakaoY. NakazawaM. NarukiZ. NatkaniecA. NatochiiM. NayakM. NeuS. NishidaR. NomaruS. OgawaR. OkuboH. OnoE. R. OxfordG. PakhlovaA. PantaS. PardiJ. ParkS. -H. ParkA. PasseriS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikM. PiccoloL. E. PiilonenP. L. M. Podesta-LermaT. PodobnikC. PrazS. PrellE. PrencipeM. T. PrimS. PrivalovH. PurwarP. RadosS. RaizK. RavindranJ. U. RehmanM. ReifS. ReiterL. ReuterD. Ricalde HerrmannI. Ripp-BaudotG. RizzoS. H. RobertsonJ. M. RoneyA. RostomyanN. RoutS. SahaL. SalutariD. A. SandersS. SandilyaL. SanteljC. SantosV. SavinovB. ScavinoC. SchmittS. SchneiderM. SchnepfK. SchoenningC. SchwandaA. J. SchwartzY. SeinoK. SenyoM. E. SeviorC. SfientiW. ShanG. SharmaX. D. ShiT. ShillingtonT. ShimasakiJ. -G. ShiuD. ShtolB. ShwartzA. SibidanovF. SimonJ. SkorupaM. SobotzikA. SofferA. SokolovE. SolovievaS. SpataroB. SpruckM. StaričP. StavroulakisS. StefkovaL. StoetzerR. StroiliM. SumihamaK. SumisawaH. SvidrasM. TakahashiM. TakizawaU. TamponiS. TanakaK. TanidaF. TenchiniA. ThallerT. Tien ManhO. TittelR. TiwaryE. TorassaK. TrabelsiF. F. TrantouI. TsaklidisI. UedaK. UngerY. UnnoK. UnoS. UnoP. UrquijoY. UshirodaS. E. VahsenR. van TonderK. E. VarvellM. VeronesiV. S. VismayaL. VitaleV. VobbilisettiR. VolpeM. WakaiS. WallnerM. -Z. WangA. WarburtonS. WatanukiC. WesselE. WonX. P. XuB. D. YabsleyW. YanJ. YeltonK. YiJ. H. YinK. YoshiharaC. Z. YuanJ. YuanY. YusaL. ZaniF. ZengM. ZeyrekB. ZhangV. ZhilichJ. S. ZhouQ. D. ZhouL. ZhuR. Žlebčík10.1103/4yv7-1h85http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04142v4Complete NLO BFKL impact factors for quarkonium hadroproduction in NRQCD: the case of ${}^1S_0^{[1]}$, ${}^1S_0^{[8]}$, and ${}^3S_1^{[8]}$ states2026-03-17T08:19:37ZWe present the first complete next-to-leading-order calculation of the impact factors for hadroproduction of the ${}^1S_0^{[1]}$, ${}^1S_0^{[8]}$, and ${}^3S_1^{[8]}$ NRQCD states within the BFKL formalism. We complete the recent virtual-correction computation presented in JHEP 12 (2024) 129 by that of the real-emission contributions. We observe the cancellation of the soft divergences between these real- and virtual-emission contributions and we note that the surviving collinear singularities are compatible with factorisation up to one loop for a novel class of processes where BFKL resummation can be applied. Our work indeed represents the first complete NLO quarkonium impact factor in the BFKL framework and paves the way to first next-to-leading-logarithmic-precision studies for hadroproduction of forward-backward quarkonium associated production at hadron colliders.2026-01-07T17:54:29Z52 pages, 6 figures; version submitted to JHEP; broken references fixedMichael FucillaJean-Philippe LansbergMaxim NefedovLech SzymanowskiSamuel Wallonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13223v3First measurement of time-dependent $CP$ violation in the flavor-changing neutral-current decay $B^{0}\rightarrow K_{S}^{0}μ^{+}μ^{-}$2026-03-17T07:51:37ZA flavor-tagged time-dependent analysis of $B^{0}\rightarrow K_{S}^{0}μ^{+}μ^{-}$ decays is performed across the full dimuon mass range excluding the $J/ψ$ and $ψ(2S)$ resonance regions. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment in 2011--2018 at center-of-mass energies of 7, 8 and 13TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9$fb^{-1}$. The CP violation parameters are determined to be $C=-0.13 \pm 0.32 \pm 0.04$ and $S= +0.82\pm 0.29 \pm 0.05$, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. The results are consistent with the Standard Model prediction. This is the first experimental study of time-dependent CP violation in $b\rightarrow sl^{+}l^{-}$ processes.2026-03-13T17:57:11ZAll figures and tables, along with machine-readable versions and any supplementary material and additional information, are available at https://lbfence.cern.ch/alcm/public/analysis/full-details/3477/ (LHCb public pages) LHCb collaborationR. AaijA. S. W. AbdelmottelebC. Abellan BetetaF. AbudinénT. AckernleyA. A. AdefisoyeB. AdevaM. AdinolfiP. AdlarsonC. AgapopoulouC. A. AidalaZ. AjaltouniS. AkarK. AkibaP. AlbicoccoJ. AlbrechtR. AleksiejunasF. AlessioP. Alvarez CartelleR. AmalricS. AmatoJ. L. AmeyY. AmhisL. AnL. AnderliniM. AnderssonP. AndreolaM. AndreottiS. Andres EstradaA. AnelliD. AoC. ArataF. ArchilliZ. AregM. ArgentonS. Arguedas CuendisL. ArnoneA. ArtamonovM. ArtusoE. AslanidesR. Ataíde Da SilvaM. AtzeniB. AudurierJ. A. AuthierD. BacherI. Bachiller PereaS. BachmannM. BachmayerJ. J. BackZ. B. BaiP. Baladron RodriguezV. BalaguraA. BalboniW. BaldiniZ. BaldwinL. BalzaniH. BaoJ. Baptista de Souza LeiteC. Barbero PretelM. BarbettiI. R. BarbosaR. J. BarlowM. BarnyakovS. BarsukW. BarterJ. BartzS. BashirB. BatsukhP. B. BattistaA. BavarcheeA. BayA. BeckM. BeckerF. BedeschiI. B. BediagaN. A. BehlingS. BelinA. BellavistaK. BelousI. BelovI. BelyaevG. BenaneG. BencivenniE. Ben-HaimA. BerezhnoyR. BernetA. BertolinF. BettiJ. BexO. BezshyykoS. BhattacharyaM. S. BiekerN. V. BiesuzA. BiolchiniM. BirchF. C. R. BishopA. BitadzeA. BizzetiT. BlakeF. BlancJ. E. BlankS. BluskV. BocharnikovJ. A. BoelhauveO. Boente GarciaT. BoettcherA. BohareA. BoldyrevC. BolognaniR. BolzonellaR. B. BonacciN. BondarA. BordeliusF. BorgatoS. BorghiM. BorsatoJ. T. BorsukE. BottalicoS. A. BouchibaM. BovillT. J. V. BowcockA. BoyerC. BozziJ. D. BrandenburgA. Brea RodriguezN. BreerJ. BrodzickaJ. BrownD. BrunduE. BuchananM. Burgos MarcosC. BurrC. ButiJ. S. ButterJ. BuytaertW. ByczynskiS. CadedduH. CaiY. CaiA. CailletR. CalabreseL. CaleficeM. CalviM. Calvo GomezP. Camargo MagalhaesJ. I. Cambon BouzasP. CampanaA. C. CamposA. F. Campoverde QuezadaY. CaoS. CapelliM. CaporaleL. CapriottiR. Caravaca-MoraA. CarboneL. Carcedo SalgadoR. CardinaleA. CardiniP. CarnitiL. CarusA. Casais VidalR. CasparyG. CasseM. CattaneoG. CavalleroV. CavalliniS. CelaniI. CelestinoS. CesareA. J. ChadwickI. ChahrourH. ChangM. CharlesPh. CharpentierE. ChatzianagnostouR. CheaibM. ChefdevilleC. ChenJ. ChenS. ChenZ. ChenA. Chen HuM. CherifA. ChernovS. ChernyshenkoX. ChiotopoulosG. ChizhikV. ChobanovaM. ChrzaszczA. ChubykinV. ChulikovP. CiambroneX. Cid VidalG. CiezarekP. CifraP. E. L. ClarkeM. ClemencicH. V. CliffJ. ClosierC. Cocha ToapaxiV. CocoJ. CoganE. CognerasL. CojocariuS. CollavitiP. CollinsT. ColomboM. ColonnaA. Comerma-MontellsL. CongedoJ. ConnaughtonA. ContuN. CookeG. CordovaC. CoronelI. CorredoiraA. CorreiaG. CortiJ. Cottee MeldrumB. CouturierD. C. CraikM. Cruz TorresM. Cubero CamposE. Curras RiveraR. CurrieC. L. Da SilvaX. DaiE. Dall'OccoJ. DalsenoC. D'AmbrosioJ. DanielG. DarzeA. DavidsonJ. E. DaviesO. De Aguiar FranciscoC. De AngelisF. De BenedettiJ. de BoerK. De BruynS. De CapuaM. De CianU. De Freitas Carneiro Da GracaE. De LuciaJ. M. De MirandaL. De PaulaM. De SerioP. De SimoneF. De VellisJ. A. de VriesF. DebernardisD. DecampS. DekkersL. Del BuonoB. DelaneyJ. DengV. DenysenkoO. DeschampsF. DettoriB. DeyP. Di NezzaI. DiachkovS. DingY. DingL. DittmannA. D. DochevaA. DohenyC. DongF. DordeiA. C. dos ReisA. D. DowlingL. DreyfusW. DuanP. DudaL. DufourV. DukP. DuranteM. M. DurasJ. M. DurhamO. D. DurmusA. DziurdaA. DzyubaS. EasoE. EcksteinU. EgedeA. EgorychevV. EgorychevS. EisenhardtE. EjopuL. EklundM. ElashriD. Elizondo BlancoJ. EllbrachtS. ElyA. EneJ. EschleT. EvansF. FabianoS. FaghihL. N. FalcaoB. FangR. FantechiL. FantiniM. FariaK. FarmerF. FassinD. FazziniL. FelkowskiC. FengM. FengA. Fernandez CasaniM. Fernandez GomezA. D. FernezF. FerrariF. Ferreira RodriguesM. FerrilloM. Ferro-LuzziS. FilippovR. A. FiniM. FioriniM. FirlejK. L. FischerD. S. FitzgeraldC. FitzpatrickT. FiutowskiF. FleuretA. FominM. FontanaL. A. ForemanR. FortyD. Foulds-HoltV. Franco LimaM. Franco SevillaM. FrankE. FranzosoG. FrauC. FreiD. A. FridayJ. FuQ. FühringT. FulghesuG. GalatiM. D. GalatiA. Gallas TorreiraD. GalliS. GambettaM. GandelmanP. GandiniB. GanieH. GaoR. GaoT. Q. GaoY. GaoY. GaoY. GaoL. M. Garcia MartinP. Garcia MorenoJ. García PardiñasP. GardnerL. GarridoC. GasparA. GavrikovL. L. GerkenE. GersabeckM. GersabeckT. GershonS. GhizzoZ. GhorbanimoghaddamF. I. GiasemisV. GibsonH. K. GiemzaA. L. GilmanM. GiovannettiA. GioventùL. GirardeyM. A. GizaF. C. GlaserV. V. GligorovC. GöbelL. Golinka-BezshyykoE. GolobardesD. GolubkovA. GolutvinS. Gomez FernandezW. GomulkaF. Goncalves AbrantesI. Gonçales VazM. GoncerzG. GongJ. A. GoodingI. V. GorelovC. GottiE. GovorkovaJ. P. GrabowskiL. A. Granado CardosoE. GraugésE. GraveriniL. GrazetteG. GrazianiA. T. GrecuN. A. GrieserL. GrilloC. GuM. GuariseL. GuerryA. -K. GuseinovE. GushchinY. GuzT. GysK. HabermannT. HadavizadehC. HadjivasiliouG. HaefeliC. HaenS. HakenG. HallettP. M. HamiltonJ. HammerichQ. HanX. HanS. Hansmann-MenzemerL. HaoN. HarnewT. J. HarrisM. HartmannS. HashmiJ. HeN. HeatleyA. HedesF. HemmerC. HendersonR. HendersonR. D. L. HendersonA. M. HennequinK. HennessyJ. HerdP. Herrero GasconJ. HeuelA. HeynA. HicheurG. Hijano MendizabalJ. HorswillR. HouY. HouD. C. HoustonN. HowarthW. HuX. HuW. HulsbergenR. J. HunterM. HushchynD. HutchcroftM. IdzikD. IlinP. IltenA. IohnerA. IshteevH. JageS. J. Jaimes EllesS. JakobsenT. JakoubekE. JansB. K. JashalA. JawaheryC. JayaweeraA. JelavicV. JevticZ. JiaE. JiangX. JiangY. JiangY. J. JiangE. Jimenez MoyaN. JindalM. JohnA. John Rubesh RajanD. JohnsonC. R. JonesS. JoshiB. JostJ. Juan CastellaN. JurikI. JuszczakK. KalecinskaD. KaminarisS. KandybeiM. KaneY. KangC. KarM. KaracsonA. KauniskangasJ. W. KautzM. K. KazaneckiF. KeizerM. KenzieT. KetelB. KhanjiS. KholodenkoG. KhreichF. KirazT. KirnV. S. KirsebomS. KlaverN. KleijneA. KleimenovaD. K. KlekotsK. KlimaszewskiM. R. KmiecT. KnospeR. KolbS. KoliievL. KolkA. KonoplyannikovP. KopciewiczP. KoppenburgA. KorchinI. KostiukO. KotS. KotriakhovaE. KowalczykA. KozachukP. KravchenkoL. KravchukO. KravcovM. KrepsP. KrokovnyW. KrupaW. KrzemienO. KshyvanskyiS. KubisM. KucharczykV. KudryavtsevE. KulikovaA. KupscV. KushnirB. KutsenkoJ. KvapilI. KyryllinD. LacarrereP. Laguarta GonzalezA. LaiA. LampisD. LancieriniC. Landesa GomezJ. J. LaneG. LanfranchiC. LangenbruchJ. LangerT. LathamF. LazzariC. LazzeroniR. Le GacH. LeeR. LefèvreA. LeflatM. LehurauxE. Lemos CidO. LeroyT. LesiakE. D. LesserB. LeveringtonA. LiC. LiC. LiH. LiJ. LiK. LiL. LiP. LiP. -R. LiQ. LiT. LiT. LiY. LiY. LiY. LiZ. LianQ. LiangX. LiangZ. LiangS. LibralonA. LightbodyC. LinT. LinR. LindnerH. LintonR. LitvinovD. LiuF. L. LiuG. LiuK. LiuS. LiuW. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. L. LiuG. Loachamin OrdonezI. LoboA. Lobo SalviaA. LoiT. LongF. C. L. LopesJ. H. LopesA. Lopez HuertasC. Lopez IribarnegarayS. López SoliñoQ. LuC. LucarelliD. LucchesiM. Lucio MartinezY. LuoA. LupatoE. LuppiK. LynchS. LyuX. -R. LyuG. M. MaH. MaS. MaccoliniF. MachefertF. MaciucB. MackI. MackayL. M. MackeyL. R. Madhan MohanM. J. MaduraiD. MagdalinskiD. MaisuzenkoJ. J. MalczewskiS. MaldeL. MalentaccaA. MalininT. MaltsevG. MancaG. MancinelliC. MancusoR. Manera EscaleroF. M. ManganellaD. ManuzziD. MarangottoJ. F. MarchandR. MarchevskiU. MarconiE. MarianiS. MarianiC. Marin BenitoJ. MarksA. M. MarshallL. MartelG. MartelliG. MartellottiL. MartinazzoliM. MartinelliD. Martinez GomezD. Martinez SantosF. Martinez VidalA. Martorell i GranollersA. MassafferriR. MatevA. MathadV. MatiuninC. MatteuzziK. R. MattioliA. MauriE. MauriceJ. MauricioP. MayencourtJ. Mazorra de CosM. MazurekD. Mazzanti TaranconM. McCannN. T. McHughA. McNabR. McNultyB. MeadowsD. MelnychukD. Mendoza GranadaP. Menendez Valdes PerezF. M. MengM. MerkA. MerliL. Meyer GarciaD. MiaoH. MiaoM. MikhasenkoD. A. MilanesA. MinottiE. MinucciT. MirallesB. MitreskaD. S. MitzelR. MocanuA. ModakL. MoeserR. D. MoiseE. F. Molina CardenasT. MombächerM. MonkT. MonnardS. MonteilA. Morcillo GomezG. MorelloM. J. MorelloM. P. MorgenthalerA. MoroJ. MoronW. MorrenA. B. MorrisA. G. MorrisR. MountainZ. MuE. MuhammadF. MuheimM. MulderK. MüllerF. Muñoz-RojasV. MytrochenkoP. NaikT. NakadaR. NandakumarG. NapoletanoI. NastevaM. NeedhamE. NekrasovaN. NeriS. NeubertN. NeufeldP. NeustroevJ. NicoliniD. NicotraE. M. NielN. NikitinL. NisiQ. NiuB. K. NjokiP. NogarolliP. NoggaC. NormandJ. Novoa FernandezG. NowakC. NunezH. N. NurA. Oblakowska-MuchaV. ObraztsovT. OeserA. OkhotnikovO. OkhrimenkoR. OldemanF. OlivaE. Olivart PinoM. OloccoR. H. O'NeilJ. S. Ordonez SotoD. OsthuesJ. M. Otalora GoicocheaP. OwenA. OyangurenO. OzcelikF. PaciollaA. PadeeK. O. PadekenB. PagareT. PajeroA. PalanoL. PaliniM. PalutanC. PanX. PanS. PanebiancoS. PaniskakiL. PaolucciA. PapanestisM. PappagalloL. L. PappalardoC. PappenheimerC. ParkesD. ParmarG. PassalevaD. PassaroA. PastoreM. PatelJ. PatocC. PatrignaniA. PaulC. J. PawleyA. PellegrinoJ. PengX. PengM. Pepe AltarelliS. PerazziniD. PereimaH. Pereira Da CostaM. Pereira MartinezA. Pereiro CastroC. PerezP. PerretA. PerrevoortA. PerroM. J. PetersK. PetridisA. PetroliniS. PezzuloJ. P. PfallerH. PhamL. PicaM. PicciniL. PiccoloB. PietrzykR. N. PilatoD. PinciF. PisaniM. PizzichemiV. M. PlacintaM. Plo CasasusT. PoeschlF. PolciM. Poli LenerA. PoluektovN. PolukhinaI. PolyakovE. PolycarpoS. PonceD. PopovK. PoppS. PoslavskiiK. PrasanthC. ProuveD. ProvenzanoV. PugatchA. Puicercus GomezG. PunziJ. R. PybusQ. QianW. QianN. QinR. QuaglianiR. I. Rabadan TrejoR. RaczJ. H. RademackerM. RamaM. Ramírez GarcíaV. Ramos De OliveiraM. Ramos PernasM. S. RangelF. RatnikovG. RavenM. Rebollo De MiguelF. RediJ. ReichF. ReissZ. RenP. K. ResmiM. Ribalda GalvezR. RibattiG. RicartD. RiccardiS. RicciardiK. RichardsonM. Richardson-SlipperF. RiehnK. RinnertP. RobbeG. RobertsonE. RodriguesA. Rodriguez AlvarezE. Rodriguez FernandezJ. A. Rodriguez LopezE. Rodriguez RodriguezJ. RoenschA. RogachevA. RogovskiyD. L. RolfP. RoloffV. RomanovskiyA. Romero VidalG. RomoliniF. RonchettiT. RongM. RotondoM. S. RudolphM. Ruiz DiazR. A. Ruiz FernandezJ. Ruiz VidalJ. J. Saavedra-AriasJ. J. Saborido SilvaS. E. R. Sacha Emile R.N. SagidovaD. SahooN. SahooB. SaittaM. SalomoniI. SanderswoodR. SantacesariaC. Santamarina RiosM. SantimariaL. SantoroE. SantovettiA. SaputiD. SaraninA. SarnatskiyG. SarpisM. SarpisC. SatrianoA. SattaM. SaurD. SavrinaH. SazakF. SborzacchiA. ScarabottoS. SchaelS. ScherlM. SchillerH. SchindlerM. SchmellingB. SchmidtN. SchmidtS. SchmittH. SchmitzO. SchneiderA. SchopperN. SchulteM. H. SchuneG. SchweringB. SciasciaA. SciuccatiG. ScrivenI. SegalS. SellamA. SemennikovT. SengerM. Senghi SoaresA. SergiN. SerraL. SestiniB. Sevilla SanjuanY. ShangD. M. ShangaseM. ShapkinR. S. SharmaL. ShchutskaT. ShearsJ. ShenZ. ShenS. ShengV. ShevchenkoB. ShiJ. ShiQ. ShiW. S. ShiE. ShmaninR. ShorkinR. Silva CoutinhoG. SimiS. SimoneM. SinghaI. SiralN. SkidmoreT. SkwarnickiM. W. SlaterE. SmithM. SmithL. Soares LavraM. D. SokoloffF. J. P. SolerA. SolominA. SolovevK. SolovievaN. S. SommerfeldR. SongY. SongY. SongY. S. SongF. L. Souza De AlmeidaB. Souza De PaulaK. M. SowaE. Spadaro NorellaE. SpedicatoJ. G. SpeerP. SpradlinF. StagniM. StahlS. StahlS. StanislausM. StefaniakO. SteinkampD. StrekalinaY. SuF. SuljikJ. SunJ. SunL. SunD. SundfeldW. SutcliffeP. SvihraV. SvintozelskyiK. SwientekF. SwystunA. SzabelskiT. SzumlakY. TanY. TangY. T. TangM. D. TatJ. A. Teijeiro JimenezA. TerentevF. TerzuoliF. TeubertE. ThomasD. J. D. ThompsonA. R. Thomson-StrongH. TilquinV. TisserandS. T'JampensM. TobinT. T. TodorovL. TomassettiG. TonaniX. TongT. TorkL. ToscanoD. Y. TouC. TripplG. TuciN. TuningL. H. UeckerA. UklejaD. J. UnverzagtA. UpadhyayB. UrbachA. UsachovA. UstyuzhaninU. UwerV. VagnoniA. VaitkeviciusV. Valcarce CadenasG. ValentiN. Valls CanudasJ. van EldikH. Van HeckeE. van HerwijnenC. B. Van HulseR. Van LaakM. van VeghelG. VasquezR. Vazquez GomezP. Vazquez RegueiroC. Vázquez SierraS. VecchiJ. Velilla SernaJ. J. VelthuisM. VeltriA. VenkateswaranM. VerdogliaM. VesterinenW. VetensD. Vico BenetP. Vidrier VillalbaM. Vieites DiazX. Vilasis-CardonaE. Vilella FiguerasA. VillaP. VincentB. VivacquaF. C. VolleD. vom BruchN. VoropaevK. VosC. VrahasJ. WagnerJ. WalshE. J. WaltonG. WanA. WangB. WangC. WangG. WangH. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangM. WangN. W. WangR. WangX. WangX. WangX. W. WangY. WangY. WangY. H. WangZ. WangZ. WangJ. A. WardM. WaterlaatN. K. WatsonD. WebsdaleY. WeiZ. WeidaJ. WendelB. D. C. WesthenryC. WhiteM. WhiteheadE. WhiterA. R. WiederholdD. WiednerM. A. WiegertjesC. WildG. WilkinsonM. K. WilkinsonM. WilliamsM. J. WilliamsM. R. J. WilliamsR. WilliamsS. WilliamsZ. WilliamsF. F. WilsonM. WinnW. WislickiM. WitekL. WitolaT. WolfE. WoodG. WormserS. A. WottonH. WuJ. WuX. WuY. WuZ. WuK. WyllieS. XianZ. XiangY. XieT. X. XingA. XuL. XuM. XuR. XuZ. XuZ. XuZ. XuS. YadavK. YangX. YangY. YangY. YangZ. YangZ. YangH. YeungH. YinX. YinC. Y. YuJ. YuX. YuanY YuanJ. A. Zamora SaaM. ZavertyaevM. ZdybalF. ZenesiniC. ZengM. ZengS. H ZengC. ZhangD. ZhangJ. ZhangL. ZhangR. ZhangS. ZhangS. L. ZhangY. ZhangY. Z. ZhangZ. ZhangY. ZhaoA. ZhelezovS. Z. ZhengX. Z. ZhengY. ZhengT. ZhouX. ZhouV. ZhovkovskaL. Z. ZhuX. ZhuX. ZhuY. ZhuV. ZhukovJ. ZhuoD. ZulianiG. Zunicahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10401v2A comparison of simulation tools for Muon-Induced X-ray Emission (MIXE) in thin films: a study case with lithium batteries2026-03-17T07:27:42ZWe present a comparative study of three Monte Carlo simulation frameworks -SRIM, GEANT4, and PHITS- for modeling the transport, stopping, and atomic cascade of negative muons in micrometer-scale, multilayer systems relevant to Muon-Induced X-ray Emission (MIXE) experiments at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). Using a lithium-ion battery as a benchmark target, simulated implantation profiles are compared with experimental data from the GIANT spectrometer. All three codes reproduce the overall muon depth distributions with good consistency, even across sharp density contrasts. SRIM provides reliable implantation estimates for compact geometries, whereas PHITS reproduces GEANT4 results with comparable accuracy and additionally generates muonic X-ray spectra. These spectra, however, exhibit a systematic energy offset in the K-line transitions of medium- and high-Z elements relative to theoretical and experimental values. Despite this bias, PHITS accurately captures relative intensities and spectral shapes, enabling element-specific line identification. The results demonstrate that SRIM and PHITS constitute practical tools for rapid estimation of muon implantation and stopping profiles, and that PHITS holds strong potential for predictive MIXE spectroscopy once its transition-energy bias is corrected.2026-01-15T13:51:15ZMaxime LamotteMichael W. HeissThomas ProkschaAlex Amatohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16191v1Search for direct pair production of top squarks in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}= 13$ TeV and $13.6$ TeV in events with two oppositely charged leptons using the ATLAS detector2026-03-17T07:20:46ZThis paper presents the search for direct pair production of top squarks decaying into two on-shell top quarks and two neutralinos in final states with two oppositely charged leptons (electrons or muons), $b$-jets and large missing transverse momentum. The search uses the full Run 2 dataset, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS detector from 2015 to 2018, and the early Run 3 dataset, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 53 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13.6$ TeV collected in 2022 and 2023. Machine-learning-based classifiers are used to distinguish the signal from Standard Model backgrounds, to enhance signal discrimination across a wide kinematic phase space. No significant excess is observed with respect to the Standard Model prediction and 95% confidence level limits are set on top squark and neutralino mass combinations reaching up to 1060 GeV for the former and 560 GeV for the latter, improving mass limits by about 10% compared to previous ATLAS analyses in the same channel.2026-03-17T07:20:46Z48 pages in total, author list starting page 31, 8 figures, 5 tables, submitted to JHEP. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HMBS-2025-06/ ATLAS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16075v1Precision $YN$ and $\bar{n}N$ measurements with an LH$_2$/LD$_2$ target in the BESIII detector2026-03-17T02:45:59ZLocated at the BEPCII $e^{+}e^{-}$ collider, the BESIII experiment provides a robust platform for investigating (anti)hyperon-nucleon ($YN$) and antineutron-nucleon ($\bar{n}N$) interactions. This is made possible by the high production cross-sections of $J/ψ$ and $ψ(3686)$ resonances and their substantial decay branches into these baryons. Although previous studies using the beam pipe as a target demonstrated feasibility, statistical precision remains constrained by the limited material budget. To address this, we propose installing a dedicated liquid hydrogen or liquid deuterium target between the beam pipe and the Cylindrical Gas Electron Multiplier Inner Tracker. Monte Carlo simulations confirm that the added material has a negligible effect on charged particle tracking. This upgrade is expected to enhance the effective luminosity for scattering on free protons by a factor of 10--30 for $Λ$, $Σ^{+}$, $Ξ$, and $\bar{n}$ beams, enabling high-precision measurements of $YN$ and $\bar{n}N$ interactions that will significantly advance our knowledge of non-perturbative strong interactions.2026-03-17T02:45:59ZZhao-Ling ZhangXu GaoWei-Min SongChang-Zheng Yuanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18310v3Proton mass decompositions in the NNLO QCD2026-03-17T01:26:24ZProton matrix elements of the QCD energy-momentum tensor (EMT) are expressed by the gravitational form factors. The forward values of the gravitational form factors allow for a decomposition of the proton mass into contributions from quarks and gluons, and further subdivisions into contributions from quark masses and from the QCD trace anomaly may be considered. We present the most recent evaluations of these mass decompositions, using a recent quantitative evaluation of the forward values of relevant gravitational form factors at the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) QCD. We also calculate the renormalization scale dependence of each component within these decompositions. Furthermore, similar calculations are performed with another decomposition of the proton mass, organized strictly according to the separation into the traceless part and trace part for each of the gauge-invariant quark/gluon parts of the EMT, such that the former (twist-two) quark/gluon contributions of the EMT embody the effects of the partonic motions inside the proton, while the latter (twist-four) contributions are induced as parton correlations by non-perturbative QCD interactions. We demonstrate the advantages of this new decomposition. We also present the results for the pion, which exhibit quite different parton-correlation behaviors from the proton.2025-11-23T06:44:34Z22 pages, 4 figures; v3: results and figures unchanged, texts improved and divided into sections, explanations on renormalization schemes added in Introduction, references added; v2: minor corrections and references addedKazuhiro TanakaJuntendo Univ.http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14552v3Toponia at the HL-LHC and FCC-ee2026-03-16T20:43:11ZThe hint of a pseudoscalar toponium state at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) opens a new avenue for studying a novel class of QCD (quasi-)bound states with comparable formation and decay times. Compared with charmonium and bottomonium, toponium is a quasi-bound state, resembling a hydrogen atom of the strong interaction, although it appears as a broader resonance. We compute the masses and annihilation decay widths of the lowest $S$-wave ($η_t$, $ψ_t$) and $P$-wave ($χ_{t0}$, $χ_{t1}$) toponium states, and assess their discovery prospects at the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) and future lepton colliders, such as the $e^+e^-$ stage of the Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee). Detecting the vector $ψ_t$ state at the HL-LHC is hindered by the Landau-Yang theorem and the gluon-dominated production environment of the collider, whereas lepton colliders offer promising sensitivity through both constituent and two-body decays. A more precise measurement of the $η_t$ mass, approximately equal to that of $ψ_t$, at the LHC could help determine the optimal $t\bar{t}$ threshold center-of-mass energy for FCC-ee. The $P$-wave states remain challenging to observe at both the HL-LHC and future lepton colliders. We also discuss how toponium measurements can be used to probe top-quark properties and to conduct indirect searches for new physics, including light scalars that couple to the top quark.2025-06-17T14:08:44Z38 pages, 9 figures, 9 tables, matches the published versionYang BaiTing-Kuo ChenYiming Yanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14585v2Testing the CKM unitarity at high energy via the $W^+W^-$ production at the LHC and future colliders2026-03-16T19:57:44ZWe propose a novel test to assess the unitarity of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix, $V_{\rm CKM}$, at present and future collider experiments. Our strategy makes use of the $W^+W^-$ production cross section to directly probe the $V_{\rm CKM}^\dagger V_{\rm CKM}$ product, which regulates the high-energy behavior of the observable. The violation of unitarity is signalled by an anomalous behavior of the cross section that grows quadratically with the $W^+W^-$ invariant mass with respect to the Standard Model prediction. By using the recent ATLAS measurements of the $W^+W^-$ cross section we are able to constrain the maximal unitarity violation allowed by current data, producing a bound complementary to the results of flavor physics experiments. Forecasts for the high luminosity phase of the LHC and for the future 100 TeV hadron collider are also discussed.2024-05-23T13:57:31Z16 pages, 3 figures, journal versionPhysics Letters B Vol. 859, (2024), 139106E. GabrielliL. MarzolaK. Müürsepp10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139106http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15866v1Towards high-pressure noble gaseous detectors for coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering2026-03-16T19:56:52ZCoherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$ν$NS) is a dominant low-energy neutrino interaction that remains experimentally challenging due to its weak-scale cross section and the small nuclear recoil energies involved. This thesis explores the scientific motivations and technical feasibility of CE$ν$NS\ detection, emphasizing the use of diverse neutrino sources -reactor, spallation, and solar- and multiple target materials. The European Spallation Source (ESS) is identified as a particularly promising site, with simulations indicating an optimal signal-to-background ratio achievable with minimal shielding at a location $\sim$24 meters from the tungsten target. Alternative facilities, such as JPARC-MFL, are also evaluated given construction delays at ESS. A significant contribution of this work is the development of a compact, low-cost, 4$π$ neutron scatter camera with integrated optical imaging, capable of characterizing neutron backgrounds and localizing sources using advanced discrimination algorithms and neural networks. Additionally, the thesis presents the design and early testing of GanESS, a novel high-pressure noble gas time projection chamber with electroluminescence amplification, optimized for CE$ν$NS detection using argon, xenon, or krypton. The Gaseous Prototype (GaP) demonstrates a promising energy threshold of 0.42$\pm$0.04 $\rm{keV}_{\rm{ee}}$ at 8.62 bar of argon and stable high-pressure performance. Detailed simulations using Garfield++ and COMSOL provide insights into electroluminescence behavior and threshold estimation, although some non-linear detector responses at low E/p remain unresolved. Overall, this work establishes a robust foundation for CE$ν$NS studies at spallation sources and advances detection technologies with broader implications for neutrino physics and rare-event searches.2026-03-16T19:56:52Z171 pages, revised version. Thesis submitted to the University of the Basque Country in candidacy for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Defended October 13, 2025Leire Larizgoitia