https://arxiv.org/api/SbwwMYp96WaPH86ktzx3pj77pJs2026-06-14T05:14:30Z6038539015http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19016v1Measurements of the Higgs boson production, fiducial and differential cross-sections in the four lepton decay channel using 164 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV with the ATLAS detector2026-05-18T18:36:51ZInclusive, differential and production-mode cross-section measurements of the Higgs boson are performed in the $H \to ZZ^{*} \to 4\ell$ decay channel. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data produced at the Large Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV and recorded with the ATLAS detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 164 fb$^{-1}$. The inclusive fiducial cross-section for the $H \to ZZ^{*} \to 4\ell$ process is measured to be $σ_{\textrm{fid}} = 3.65^{+0.35}_{-0.33}~\textrm{fb}$, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction of $σ_{\textrm{fid}}^{\textrm{SM}} = 3.68 \pm 0.17~\textrm{fb}$. Differential cross-sections are measured as a function of key kinematic observables of the Higgs boson and the four-lepton final state. Cross-sections are measured for the main production-modes in several exclusive regions of the Higgs boson production phase space and combined to measure an overall Higgs boson signal strength, defined as the measured cross-section normalised to the SM prediction, of $μ= 0.99 \pm 0.13$. The results are interpreted in terms of modifications of Higgs boson couplings using the $κ$ framework, within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, and in scenarios probing the Higgs boson self-coupling. All the results are consistent with Standard Model expectations.2026-05-18T18:36:51Z68 pages in total, author list starting page 51, 19 figures, 18 tables, to be submitted to JHEP. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HIGP-2025-09 ATLAS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18581v1Low-field carrier mobilities in silicon irradiated to extreme fluences2026-05-18T15:59:00ZThe low-field carrier mobilities in <100> silicon were quantified as a function of the 1$\,$MeV neutron-equivalent fluence up to $10^{18}\,$cm$^{-2}$ and for temperatures between 230$\,$K and 260$\,$K. Current measurements were fitted using a mobility model for scattering at ionized impurities. Technology-aided design (TCAD) simulations were compared to measurements and used to estimate the carrier concentrations, which are parameters in the fit. The fit model describes the data very well, both as a function of fluence and the temperature. At a fluence of $6 \cdot 10^{17}\,$cm$^{-2}$, which is expected for the innermost detector layers at the proposed Future Circular Hadron Collider (FCC-hh), the sum of the mobilities of electrons and holes was found to decrease by $\sim60$%.2026-05-18T15:59:00Z21st "Trento" Workshop on Advanced Silicon Radiation DetectorsI. BlochDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronB. BruersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronC. -T. KleinCarleton UniversityH. LackerHumboldt University of BerlinP. LiHumboldt University of BerlinM. UllanInstituto de Microelectrónica de BarcelonaY. UnnoInstitute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, High Energy Accelerator Research OrganizationI. MandićJožef Stefan InstituteC. ScharfHumboldt University of Berlinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18519v1Quark and gluon tomography of the helium-4 nucleus2026-05-18T15:08:17ZQCD collinear factorization allows coherent hard exclusive reactions to reveal the quark-gluon structure of light nuclei, enabling their 3D tomography. We study elastic form factors and deeply virtual Compton scattering on a helium-4 target, achieving theoretical precision unprecedented even in proton studies. Constraining generalized parton distributions at next-to-leading order in $α_s$, incorporating kinematic twist corrections, and using full evolution equations, we provide the first tomography of a light nucleus, revealing distinct transverse spatial distributions of quarks and gluons.2026-05-18T15:08:17ZV. Martínez-FernándezB. PireP. SznajderJ. Wagnerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25677v2Coherent deeply virtual Compton scattering on helium-4 beyond leading power2026-05-18T14:59:13ZCoherent hard exclusive reactions on light nuclei provide access to their quark and gluon structure and enable three-dimensional tomography of these complex systems. We study deeply virtual Compton scattering on a helium-4 target, including both kinematic twist-3 and twist-4 corrections, as well as next-to-leading-order corrections to the twist-2 amplitude in the strong coupling $α_s$. We show that these contributions are crucial for achieving a precise description of the data and, as a result, obtain the first tomographic image of the helium-4 nucleus at the quark-gluon level.2026-04-28T14:08:40ZVíctor Martínez-FernándezB. PireP. SznajderJ. Wagnerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18382v1Probing SMEFT Operators through $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ Production with Hyper-Graph Neural Networks at the LHC2026-05-18T13:27:32ZWe present a phenomenological study of $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$~TeV, using a Hyper-Graph Neural Network (H-GNN) to discriminate multilepton signal events from the dominant SM backgrounds, namely $t\bar{t}W$, $t\bar{t}Z$, $t\bar{t}H$, $t\bar{t}VV$, single-top associated production, and diboson and triboson processes. In the H-GNN architecture each event is represented as a hypergraph whose nodes correspond to reconstructed jets and leptons and whose hyperedges encode higher-order correlations among arbitrary subsets of these objects, allowing the network to learn the many-body kinematic structures that characterize the $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ final state. Combining same-sign di-lepton, tri-lepton, and four-lepton channels following a CMS-like event selection, the H-GNN attains an area under the ROC curve of $0.951$ for the $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ signal and yields a statistical significance of $Z = 9.11$ at an integrated luminosity of $\mathcal{L} = 140~\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$, to be compared with $Z = 8.62$ for a SPANet baseline, $Z = 7.37$ for a Particle Transformer baseline, and $Z = 5.13$ obtained by the ATLAS analysis, evaluated under identical event selection. We exploit the improved signal extraction to derive one- and two-parameter $95\%$ confidence level limits on the Wilson coefficients of the dimension-six operators $\mathcal{O}_{Φu}$, $\mathcal{O}^{(1)}_{tt}$, $\mathcal{O}^{(1)}_{qq}$, $\mathcal{O}^{(1)}_{qt}$, and $\mathcal{O}^{(8)}_{qt}$, and we project the expected sensitivity at the HL-LHC integrated luminosities of $1000~\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ and $3000~\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ with $50\%$ uncertainty on the background estimation.2026-05-18T13:27:32Z16 pages, 9 figures, 3 tables. Comments are welcomeAmir SubbaSanmay Gangulyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00502v2Measurements of electroweak production of a photon in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV2026-05-18T12:00:01ZThe first observation of electroweak production of a photon in association with two forward jets in proton-proton collisions is presented. The measurement uses data recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC during 2016$-$2018 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The analysis is performed in a region enriched in photon production via vector boson fusion, with a requirement on the transverse momentum of the photon to exceed 200 GeV. The cross section is measured to be 202 $^{+36}_{-32}$ fb, at a significance with respect to the null hypothesis that exceeds five standard deviations. This is in agreement with the standard model prediction of 177 $^{+13}_{-12}$ fb. Differential cross sections are measured as a function of various observables. Limits are set on dimension-6 effective field theory operators that contribute to the WW$γ$ interaction. The observed 95% confidence intervals for the corresponding Warsaw basis Wilson coefficients $c_\mathrm{W}$ and $c_\mathrm{HWB}$ are [$-$0.11, 0.16] and [$-$1.6, 1.5], respectively.2025-11-29T14:16:21ZReplaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/SMP-19-005 (CMS Public Pages)JHEP 05 (2026) 020 CMS Collaboration10.1007/JHEP05(2026)020http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05868v2Unified framework for precise background modeling to enhance rare event detection at the Kuo-Sheng nuclear reactor laboratory2026-05-18T11:59:34ZA comprehensive GEANT4 simulation framework was developed to model the background of the TEXONO experiment, including contributions from radioactive isotopes in detector components and the surrounding environment. The HPGe detector front-end electronics (pre-amplifier) were modeled with trace amounts of naturally occurring radionuclides 238U, 232Th, and 235U from manufacturing materials. Results show that the 238U and 232Th decay chains dominate the background below 400 keV, each contributing O(1) counts kg^-1 keV^-1 day^-1. Trace impurities were also introduced into the anti-Compton veto (ACV) detectors to represent realistic materials: 40K in the NaI(Tl) crystal and 137Cs in the CsI(Tl) detector. Simulations identified measurable background contributions from both isotopes, with the residual spectrum dominated by 40K gamma-rays and smaller contributions from 137Cs. The 40K background rate is about 0.1 counts kg^-1 keV^-1 day^-1, nearly 10 times larger than that from 137Cs below 400 keV. Environmental radioactivity was modeled using 60Co, 54Mn, and 135Xe distributed in the air gap between the copper end-cap and the NaI(Tl) ACV detector, representing airborne and surface contamination. These sources contribute minor background components below 100 keV, at levels of about 10^-2, 10^-2, and 0.1 counts kg^-1 keV^-1 day^-1 for 135Xe, 54Mn, and 60Co, respectively. Comparison of simulated and measured spectra shows good overall agreement, with only minor deviations at specific gamma-lines, validating the background model and demonstrating the robustness of the simulation framework for detector and shielding design.2025-10-07T12:36:46Z28 pages, 12 figuresSubhasis Parhi et al 2026 JINST 21 P05016Subhasis ParhiLakhwinder SinghManoj Kumar SinghHenry Tsz-King WongVenktesh Singh10.1088/1748-0221/21/05/P05016http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18212v1Short-Range Tests of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law2026-05-18T10:57:03ZExperimental constraints on the gravitational inverse-square law at short range are presented, employing a consistent formalism across a wide range of length scales. We provide comprehensive updates from the past decade, building upon our previous review. This work facilitates the direct comparison of experimental results with theoretical models that extend general relativity. Furthermore, a comparison between various model parametrizations, including extra-dimensional models, is introduced. Finally, results from tabletop experiments are compared with those from high-energy collider experiments for both Yukawa and power-law potentials.2026-05-18T10:57:03ZJiro MurataTakuhiro FujiieSae Suzukihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18084v1Flavour Changing Neutral Current decays at LHCb2026-05-18T09:00:27ZFlavour Changing Neutral Current (FCNC) decays are forbidden at lowest perturbative order in the Standard Model (SM) and only allowed via quantum loops. These transitions are therefore heavily suppressed in the SM, and New Physics (NP) can give significant contributions through virtual corrections. Of particular interest are semileptonic $b\to s(d)\ell^+\ell^-$ and radiative $b\to s(d)γ$ decays that allow to not only to search for the presence of NP, but also probe its potential operator structure through a multitude of observables. These observables include measurements of branching fractions, angular observables, CP-asymmetries and tests of lepton flavour universality. Long-standing tensions of data with SM predictions have been observed in $b\to sμ^+μ^-$ decays, consistently in measurements of branching fractions and angular analyses. However, the significance of these tensions depends on assumptions on hadronic uncertainties in the SM prediction. These proceedings summarise the most recent results on FCNC decays from the LHCb experiment, including the legacy measurement of the key decay $B^0\to K^{*0}μ^+μ^-$, using $8.4\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of data from the LHC Run 1 and 2.2026-05-18T09:00:27ZContribution to the 2026 Electroweak session of the 60th Rencontres de Moriond. 6 pages, 6 figuresChristoph Langenbruchfor the LHCb collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11780v3Observation of a cross-section enhancement near the $t\bar{t}$ production threshold in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector2026-05-18T08:56:31ZA measurement of $t\bar{t}$ production is presented in the invariant-mass region near the pair production threshold, $m_{t\bar{t}} \sim 345$ GeV, in final states with two charged leptons and multiple jets. The measurement is based on $140\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data collected at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The data are compared to two models of $t\bar{t}$ production: a baseline model including only perturbative QCD predictions for the hard process at approximate next-to-next-to leading order accuracy in the strong coupling, and an extended model that, in addition, incorporates non-relativistic QCD simulations that also include the formation of colour-singlet quasi-bound-states near the $t\bar{t}$ threshold. The agreement between the data and the models is quantified via a profile-likelihood fit to the reconstructed $m_{t\bar{t}}$ distributions, in bins of two angular observables sensitive to spin-correlations in the $t\bar{t}$ system. An excess of events is observed over the baseline perturbative QCD prediction, with an observed significance over $8$ standard deviations. This excess is consistent with the formation of colour-singlet and spin-singlet $S$-wave quasi-bound $t\bar{t}$ states, as predicted by non-relativistic QCD, and corresponds to an observed cross-section of $9.3^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ pb.2026-01-16T21:05:04Z64 pages in total, author list starting page 47, 12 figures, 4 tables, published at Reports on Progress in Physics. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at <https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/TOPQ-2025-11/> v2: updated metadataRep. Prog. Phys. 89 (2026) 057801 ATLAS Collaboration10.1088/1361-6633/ae60a0http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25100v6Search for the charmonium semi-leptonic weak decay $J/ψ\rightarrow D_s^-e^+ν_e+c.c.$2026-05-18T07:53:13ZUsing a data sample of $(10087 \pm 44) \times 10^6$ $J/ψ$ events collected with the BESIII detector at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=3.097\ \textrm{GeV}$, a dedicated search for the charmonium semileptonic weak decay $J/ψ\rightarrow D_s^-e^+ν_e + \text{c.c.}$ is performed. No significant signal is observed. An upper limit on the branching fraction is set at $\mathcal{B}(J/ψ\rightarrow D_s^- e^+ ν_e + \text{c.c.}) < 9.9 \times 10^{-8}$ at the 90\% confidence level. This result improves upon previous constraints by an order of magnitude, representing the most stringent experimental limit to date. It thus provides a critical test of Standard Model predictions and new physics scenarios in heavy-quark dynamics.2025-10-29T02:11:34Z18 pages, 4 figures BESIII CollaborationM. AblikimM. N. AchasovP. AdlarsonX. C. AiR. AlibertiA. AmorosoQ. AnY. BaiO. BakinaY. BanH. -R. BaoV. BatozskayaK. BegzsurenN. BergerM. BerlowskiM. B. BertaniD. BettoniF. BianchiE. BiancoA. BortoneI. BoykoR. A. BriereA. BrueggemannH. CaiM. H. CaiX. CaiA. CalcaterraG. F. CaoN. CaoS. A. CetinX. Y. ChaiJ. F. ChangT. T. ChangG. R. CheY. Z. CheC. H. ChenChao ChenG. ChenH. S. ChenH. Y. ChenM. L. ChenS. J. ChenS. M. ChenT. ChenX. R. ChenX. T. ChenX. Y. ChenY. B. ChenY. Q. ChenZ. K. ChenJ. C. ChengL. N. ChengS. K. ChoiX. ChuG. CibinettoF. CossioJ. Cottee-MeldrumH. L. DaiJ. P. DaiX. C. DaiA. DbeyssiR. E. de BoerD. DedovichC. Q. DengZ. Y. DengA. DenigI. DenisenkoM. DestefanisF. De MoriX. X. DingY. DingY. X. DingJ. DongL. Y. DongM. Y. DongX. DongM. C. DuS. X. DuS. X. DuX. L. DuY. Y. DuanZ. H. DuanP. EgorovG. F. FanJ. J. FanY. H. FanJ. FangJ. FangS. S. FangW. X. FangY. Q. FangL. FavaF. FeldbauerG. FeliciC. Q. FengJ. H. FengL. FengQ. X. FengY. T. FengM. FritschC. D. FuJ. L. FuY. W. FuH. GaoY. GaoY. N. GaoY. N. GaoY. Y. GaoZ. GaoS. GarbolinoI. GarziaL. GeP. T. GeZ. W. GeC. GengE. M. GersabeckA. GilmanK. GoetzenJ. D. GongL. GongW. X. GongW. GradlS. GramignaM. GrecoM. D. GuM. H. GuC. Y. GuanA. Q. GuoJ. N. GuoL. B. GuoM. J. GuoR. P. GuoX. GuoY. P. GuoA. GuskovJ. GutierrezT. T. HanF. HanischK. D. HaoX. Q. HaoF. A. HarrisC. Z. HeK. L. HeF. H. HeinsiusC. H. HeinzY. K. HengC. HeroldP. C. HongG. Y. HouX. T. HouY. R. HouZ. L. HouH. M. HuJ. F. HuQ. P. HuS. L. HuT. HuY. HuZ. M. HuG. S. HuangK. X. HuangL. Q. HuangP. HuangX. T. HuangY. P. HuangY. S. HuangT. HussainN. HüskenN. in der WiescheJ. JacksonQ. JiQ. P. JiW. JiX. B. JiX. L. JiX. Q. JiaZ. K. JiaD. JiangH. B. JiangP. C. JiangS. J. JiangX. S. JiangY. JiangJ. B. JiaoJ. K. JiaoZ. JiaoS. JinY. JinM. Q. JingX. M. JingT. JohanssonS. KabanaN. Kalantar-NayestanakiX. L. KangX. S. KangM. KavatsyukB. C. KeV. KhachatryanA. KhoukazO. B. KolcuB. KopfL. KrögerM. KuessnerX. KuiN. KumarA. KupscW. KühnQ. LanW. N. LanT. T. LeiM. LellmannT. LenzC. LiC. LiC. H. LiC. K. LiD. M. LiF. LiG. LiH. B. LiH. J. LiH. L. LiH. N. LiHui LiJ. R. LiJ. S. LiJ. W. LiK. LiK. L. LiL. J. LiLei LiM. H. LiM. R. LiP. L. LiP. R. LiQ. M. LiQ. X. LiR. LiS. X. LiShanshan LiT. LiT. Y. LiW. D. LiW. G. LiX. LiX. H. LiX. K. LiX. L. LiX. Y. LiX. Z. LiY. LiY. G. LiY. P. LiZ. H. LiZ. J. LiZ. X. LiZ. Y. LiC. LiangH. LiangY. F. LiangY. T. LiangG. R. LiaoL. B. LiaoM. H. LiaoY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyA. LimphiratD. X. LinL. Q. LinT. LinB. J. LiuB. X. LiuC. X. LiuF. LiuF. H. LiuFeng LiuG. M. LiuH. LiuH. B. LiuH. H. LiuH. M. LiuHuihui LiuJ. B. LiuJ. J. LiuK. LiuK. LiuK. Y. LiuKe LiuL. LiuL. C. LiuLu LiuM. H. LiuP. L. LiuQ. LiuS. B. LiuW. M. LiuW. T. LiuX. LiuX. K. LiuX. L. LiuX. Y. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. B. LiuZ. A. LiuZ. D. LiuZ. Q. LiuZ. Y. LiuX. C. LouH. J. LuJ. G. LuX. L. LuY. LuY. H. LuY. P. LuZ. H. LuC. L. LuoJ. R. LuoJ. S. LuoM. X. LuoT. LuoX. L. LuoZ. Y. LvX. R. LyuY. F. LyuY. H. LyuF. C. MaH. L. MaHeng MaJ. L. MaL. L. MaL. R. MaQ. M. MaR. Q. MaR. Y. MaT. MaX. T. MaX. Y. MaY. M. MaF. E. MaasI. MacKayM. MaggioraS. MaldeQ. A. MalikH. X. MaoY. J. MaoZ. P. MaoS. MarcelloA. MarshallF. M. MelendiY. H. MengZ. X. MengG. MezzadriH. MiaoT. J. MinR. E. MitchellX. H. MoB. MosesN. Yu. MuchnoiJ. MuskallaY. NefedovF. NerlingH. NeuwirthZ. NingS. NisarQ. L. NiuW. D. NiuY. NiuC. NormandS. L. OlsenQ. OuyangS. PacettiX. PanY. PanA. PathakY. P. PeiM. PelizaeusH. P. PengX. J. PengY. Y. PengK. PetersK. PetridisJ. L. PingR. G. PingS. PluraV. PrasadF. Z. QiH. R. QiM. QiS. QianW. B. QianC. F. QiaoJ. H. QiaoJ. J. QinJ. L. QinL. Q. QinL. Y. QinP. B. QinX. P. QinX. S. QinZ. H. QinJ. F. QiuZ. H. QuJ. RademackerC. F. RedmerA. RivettiM. RoloG. RongS. S. RongF. RosiniCh. RosnerM. Q. RuanN. SaloneA. SarantsevY. SchelhaasK. SchoenningM. ScodeggioW. ShanX. Y. ShanZ. J. ShangJ. F. ShangguanL. G. ShaoM. ShaoC. P. ShenH. F. ShenW. H. ShenX. Y. ShenB. A. ShiH. ShiJ. L. ShiJ. Y. ShiS. Y. ShiX. ShiH. L. SongJ. J. SongM. H. SongT. Z. SongW. M. SongY. X. SongZirong SongS. SosioS. SpataroS. StansilausF. StielerS. S SuG. B. SunG. X. SunH. SunH. K. SunJ. F. SunK. SunL. SunR. SunS. S. SunT. SunW. Y. SunY. C. SunY. H. SunY. J. SunY. Z. SunZ. Q. SunZ. T. SunC. J. TangG. Y. TangJ. TangJ. J. TangL. F. TangY. A. TangL. Y. TaoM. TatJ. X. TengJ. Y. TianW. H. TianY. TianZ. F. TianI. UmanB. WangB. WangBo WangC. WangC. WangCong WangD. Y. WangH. J. WangJ. WangJ. J. WangJ. P. WangK. WangL. L. WangL. W. WangM. WangM. WangN. Y. WangS. WangShun WangT. WangT. J. WangW. WangW. P. WangX. WangX. F. WangX. L. WangX. N. WangXin WangY. WangY. D. WangY. F. WangY. H. WangY. J. WangY. L. WangY. N. WangY. N. WangYaqian WangYi WangYuan WangZ. WangZ. WangZ. L. WangZ. Q. WangZ. Y. WangZiyi WangD. WeiD. H. WeiH. R. WeiF. WeidnerS. P. WenU. WiednerG. WilkinsonM. WolkeJ. F. WuL. H. WuL. J. WuL. J. WuLianjie WuS. G. WuS. M. WuX. WuY. J. WuZ. WuL. XiaB. H. XiangD. XiaoG. Y. XiaoH. XiaoY. L. XiaoZ. J. XiaoC. XieK. J. XieY. XieY. G. XieY. H. XieZ. P. XieT. Y. XingC. J. XuG. F. XuH. Y. XuM. XuQ. J. XuQ. N. XuT. D. XuX. P. XuY. XuY. C. XuZ. S. XuF. YanL. YanW. B. YanW. C. YanW. H. YanW. P. YanX. Q. YanH. J. YangH. L. YangH. X. YangJ. H. YangR. J. YangY. YangY. H. YangY. Q. YangY. Z. YangZ. P. YaoM. YeM. H. YeZ. J. YeJunhao YinZ. Y. YouB. X. YuC. X. YuG. YuJ. S. YuL. W. YuT. YuX. D. YuY. C. YuY. C. YuC. Z. YuanH. YuanJ. YuanJ. YuanL. YuanM. K. YuanS. H. YuanY. YuanC. X. YueYing YueA. A. ZafarF. R. ZengS. H. ZengX. ZengYujie ZengY. J. ZengY. C. ZhaiY. H. ZhanShunan ZhangB. L. ZhangB. X. ZhangD. H. ZhangG. Y. ZhangG. Y. ZhangH. ZhangH. ZhangH. C. ZhangH. H. ZhangH. Q. ZhangH. R. ZhangH. Y. ZhangJ. ZhangJ. J. ZhangJ. L. ZhangJ. Q. ZhangJ. S. ZhangJ. W. ZhangJ. X. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Z. ZhangJianyu ZhangL. M. ZhangLei ZhangN. ZhangP. ZhangQ. ZhangQ. Y. ZhangR. Y. ZhangS. H. ZhangShulei ZhangX. M. ZhangX. Y. ZhangY. ZhangY. ZhangY. T. ZhangY. H. ZhangY. P. ZhangZ. D. ZhangZ. H. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. X. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Z. ZhangZh. Zh. ZhangG. ZhaoJ. Y. ZhaoJ. Z. ZhaoL. ZhaoL. ZhaoM. G. ZhaoS. J. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoY. L. ZhaoY. X. ZhaoZ. G. ZhaoA. ZhemchugovB. ZhengB. M. ZhengJ. P. ZhengW. J. ZhengX. R. ZhengY. H. ZhengB. ZhongC. ZhongH. ZhouJ. Q. ZhouS. ZhouX. ZhouX. K. ZhouX. R. ZhouX. Y. ZhouY. X. ZhouY. Z. ZhouA. N. ZhuJ. ZhuK. ZhuK. J. ZhuK. S. ZhuL. ZhuL. X. ZhuS. H. ZhuT. J. ZhuW. D. ZhuW. J. ZhuW. Z. ZhuY. C. ZhuZ. A. ZhuX. Y. ZhuangJ. H. ZouJ. Zuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17871v1MAGE-HEP: Monte Carlo Analysis and Graphical Environment for High-Energy Physics2026-05-18T05:30:16ZMonte Carlo event generators are central to high-energy physics analysis. However, workflows based on handwritten scripts can be difficult to reuse, modify, and reproduce when multiple Monte Carlo models, tune variations, run variations, and output formats are involved. We present MAGE-HEP, short for Monte Carlo Analysis and Graphical Environment for High-Energy Physics, a Graphical User Interface (GUI) driven workflow environment for reproducible Monte Carlo-based analyses in high-energy physics. MAGE-HEP organizes analysis workflows through a project-study-run hierarchy. The project stores the workspace, the study stores the reusable analysis context, and each run represents a controlled execution of that context.
The MAGE-HEP Node API provides the analysis-building layer for defining generator configurations, observables, selections, output rules, and generated C++/ROOT analysis code. A study context can be inspected, reused, or exported as a \texttt{.mcx} context bundle, while the project state can be exported as a portable \texttt{.mgp} bundle. The current beta implementation validates the core idea using a PYTHIA8 and ROOT workflow. It includes background execution, manifest-based run tracking, live ROOT inspection, and particle-table summaries for supported output layouts. This paper describes the architecture, workflow, and current beta implementation of MAGE-HEP.2026-05-18T05:30:16Z11 pages, 9 captioned figures. Comments and suggestions are welcomeRishabh GuptaKangkan GoswamiSuraj PrasadRaghunath Sahoohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17832v1Higher excited charmed and charmed-strange mesons in an unquenched quark model2026-05-18T04:12:04ZIn this paper, as a continuation of our previous work, we systematically study the mass spectra and OZI-allowed strong decays of the higher $3S$-, $2P$-, $2D$-, and $1F$-wave charmed and charmed-strange mesons within a unified unquenched quark model. It is found that for most of the higher excitations, the masses are significantly shifted down by the coupled-channel effects. The newly observed $D_{s1}(2933)^+$ reported by the LHCb collaboration could be identified as the low-mass axial-vector state $D_s(2P_1)$ via the $2^1P_1-2^3P_1$ mixing. For the broad structure $D_{sJ}(3040)^+$ observed earlier by the \emph{BABAR} collaboration, the $D_s(3^1S_0)$ assignment seems to be favored over the high-mass mixed state $D_s(2P_1^\prime)$. Meanwhile, the $D(3000)^0$ signals observed at LHCb cannot be well understood with any $3S$, $2P$, $2D$, or $1F$ assignments in the $D$-meson family. Our predicted masses and decay properties of the missing higher $D$ and $D_s$ mesons may provide useful information for future experimental searches.2026-05-18T04:12:04Z18 pages, 1 figureRu-Hui NiJia-Jun WuXian-Hui Zhonghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14735v2Dalitz decay of $K^*(892) \rightarrow K \ell^+\ell^-$: A New Probe for Hadronic Structure and Dark Photon Searches2026-05-18T01:59:50ZWe present the first comprehensive study of the rare Dalitz decay $K^*(892) \rightarrow K \ell^+ \ell^- (\ell = e, μ)$, providing a prediction for the branching fraction and the dilepton mass spectrum. This decay involves the emission of a virtual photon which converts into a lepton pair, offering a probe of the transition form factor $F_{K^*K}(q^2)$ and underlying meson structure. Using a single pole approximation for the form factor, we present the calculation of the branching fraction for this rare decay channel for the first time. Furthermore, we also investigate the potential to search for a light $A^\prime$ boson (dark photon) appearing as a narrow resonance in the dilepton spectrum, and discuss the experimental sensitivity and new physics opportunities at the dedicated BESIII experiment. Our results establish $K^*(892) \rightarrow K \ell^+ \ell^- (l = e, μ)$ as a new laboratory for hadronic structure and dark-sector searches.2026-04-16T07:50:16ZBenhou XiangWanling ChangShuangshi FangJingqing Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17457v1Quantum Error Correction Assisted Axion Search in CMOS Spin Qubit Arrays2026-05-17T13:59:15ZSearches for axion and axionlike dark matter based on solid-state spin qubits are fundamentally limited by strong longitudinal dephasing, which rapidly suppresses the sensitivity gains offered by entanglement. Here we show that quantum error correction (QEC) can substantially enhance axion search sensitivity in realistic semiconductor spin qubit platforms by mitigating this dominant noise source. By integrating an optimally chosen repetition code QEC with logical GHZ block entanglement, we derive closed-form expressions for the quantum Fisher information that explicitly incorporate the finite coherence time of the axion field. Our analysis demonstrates that modest QEC cycle frequencies are sufficient to significantly reduce the effective dephasing rate, thereby restoring a broad parameter regime in which entanglement-enhanced sensing surpasses the standard quantum limit. Projecting these results onto CMOS-compatible device parameters, we find that QEC-protected entangled sensing can revive otherwise inaccessible quantum advantages, yielding up to order-of-magnitude improvements in sensitivity to the axion-electron coupling $g_{ae}$. These results establish a practical and theoretically controlled pathway for using QEC to improve qubit array searches for physics beyond the Standard Model.2026-05-17T13:59:15ZXiangjun TanZhanning Wang