https://arxiv.org/api/lGYtI78OpPoQQxw4t7yagDRixXA2026-06-14T02:29:22Z6038534515http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22891v1Pointwise Metrics Mislead: An Evaluation Protocol for Multimodal Inverse Problems2026-05-21T13:30:33ZEvaluation in scientific reconstruction is dominated by pointwise metrics - RMSE, MAE, per-event resolution - under the implicit assumption that lower error means better reconstruction. We show that this assumption fails structurally for inverse problems with multimodal posteriors. By the law of total variance, point estimators trained to minimize MSE or MAE produce a marginal spectrum strictly narrower than the truth whenever the posterior has nonzero width. The resulting bias is independent of architecture, training, and dataset size, and it compresses precisely the spectral features - tails, modes, shapes - that downstream scientific measurements rely on. We propose a three-part evaluation protocol where each step targets a failure mode the others miss: per-event distributional accuracy via CRPS, population-level marginal accuracy via a spectrum-fidelity diagnostic, and uncertainty trustworthiness via coverage-based calibration. On a synthetic benchmark with an analytic posterior and on a realistic many-to-one inverse problem from particle physics, model rankings reverse between pointwise and distributional metrics, and calibration further separates architectures indistinguishable under CRPS. The evaluation protocol, not the model, determines the scientific conclusion.2026-05-21T13:30:33Z29 pages, 9 figures, and 8 tables (including appendix)Mads H. BaattrupJörn BachLaurids JeppeFinn LabeAlexander GrohsjeanChristian SchwanenbergerPeer Stelldingerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21462v2Study of the reactions $\bar{n} p \to 2π^{+}π^{-}$, $2π^{+}π^{-}π^{0}$, and $2π^{+}π^{-}2π^{0}$ using $J/ψ\to p π^{-}\bar{n}$2026-05-21T13:17:36ZWe report an experimental investigation of the reactions $\bar{n} p \to 2π^{+}π^{-}$, $\bar{n} p \to 2π^{+}π^{-}π^{0}$, and $\bar{n} p \to 2π^{+}π^{-}2π^{0}$ using $(10.087 \pm 0.044) \times 10^{9}$ $J/ψ$ events collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII storage ring. The antineutron ($\bar{n}$) is produced in the decay $J/ψ\to p π^{-} \bar{n}$ with studied momentum from 200~MeV/$c$ to 1174~MeV/$c$, while the target proton originates from the hydrogen nuclei in the cooling oil of the beam pipe. This novel method pioneers the study of $\bar{n}$-nucleon interactions at an $e^{+}e^{-}$ collider, providing the first experimental data for $\bar{n}$ momenta exceeding 800~MeV/$c$.2025-11-26T14:53:30Z BESIII CollaborationM. AblikimM. N. AchasovP. AdlarsonX. C. AiR. AlibertiA. AmorosoQ. AnY. BaiO. BakinaY. BanH. -R. BaoX. L. BaoV. BatozskayaK. BegzsurenN. BergerM. BerlowskiM. B. BertaniD. BettoniF. BianchiE. BiancoA. BortoneI. BoykoR. A. BriereA. BrueggemannH. CaiM. H. CaiX. CaiA. CalcaterraG. F. CaoN. CaoS. A. CetinX. Y. ChaiJ. F. ChangT. T. ChangG. R. CheY. Z. CheC. H. ChenChao ChenG. ChenH. S. ChenH. Y. ChenM. L. ChenS. J. ChenS. M. ChenT. ChenW. ChenX. R. ChenX. T. ChenX. Y. ChenY. B. ChenY. Q. ChenZ. K. ChenJ. ChengL. N. ChengS. K. ChoiX. ChuG. CibinettoF. CossioJ. Cottee-MeldrumH. L. DaiJ. P. DaiX. C. DaiA. DbeyssiR. E. de BoerD. DedovichC. Q. DengZ. Y. DengA. DenigI. DenisenkoM. DestefanisF. De MoriX. X. DingY. DingY. X. DingJ. DongL. Y. DongM. Y. DongX. DongM. C. DuS. X. DuS. X. DuX. L. DuY. Y. DuanZ. H. DuanP. EgorovG. F. FanJ. J. FanY. H. FanJ. FangJ. FangS. S. FangW. X. FangY. Q. FangL. FavaF. FeldbauerG. FeliciC. Q. FengJ. H. FengL. FengQ. X. FengY. T. FengM. FritschC. D. FuJ. L. FuY. W. FuH. GaoY. GaoY. N. GaoY. N. GaoY. Y. GaoZ. GaoS. GarbolinoI. GarziaL. GeP. T. GeZ. W. GeC. GengE. M. GersabeckA. GilmanK. GoetzenJ. GollubJ. D. GongL. GongW. X. GongW. GradlS. GramignaM. GrecoM. D. GuM. H. GuC. Y. GuanA. Q. GuoJ. N. GuoL. B. GuoM. J. GuoR. P. GuoX. GuoY. P. GuoA. GuskovJ. GutierrezT. T. HanF. HanischK. D. HaoX. Q. HaoF. A. HarrisC. Z. HeK. L. HeF. H. HeinsiusC. H. HeinzY. K. HengC. HeroldP. C. HongG. Y. HouX. T. HouY. R. HouZ. L. HouH. M. HuJ. F. HuQ. P. HuS. L. HuT. HuY. HuZ. M. HuG. S. HuangK. X. HuangL. Q. HuangP. HuangX. T. HuangY. P. HuangY. S. HuangT. HussainN. HüskenN. in der WiescheJ. JacksonQ. JiQ. P. JiW. JiX. B. JiX. L. JiX. Q. JiaZ. K. JiaD. JiangH. B. JiangP. C. JiangS. J. JiangX. S. JiangJ. B. JiaoJ. K. JiaoZ. JiaoL. C. L. JinS. JinY. JinM. Q. JingX. M. JingT. JohanssonS. KabanaX. L. KangX. S. KangB. C. KeV. KhachatryanA. KhoukazO. B. KolcuB. KopfL. KrögerM. KuessnerX. KuiN. KumarA. KupscW. KühnQ. LanW. N. LanT. T. LeiM. LellmannT. LenzC. LiC. LiC. H. LiC. K. LiD. M. LiF. LiG. LiH. B. LiH. J. LiH. L. LiH. N. LiHui LiJ. R. LiJ. S. LiJ. W. LiK. LiK. L. LiL. J. LiLei LiM. H. LiM. R. LiP. L. LiP. R. LiQ. M. LiQ. X. LiR. LiS. X. LiShanshan LiT. LiT. Y. LiW. D. LiW. G. LiX. LiX. H. LiX. K. LiX. L. LiX. Y. LiX. Z. LiY. LiY. G. LiY. P. LiZ. H. LiZ. J. LiZ. X. LiZ. Y. LiC. LiangH. LiangY. F. LiangY. T. LiangG. R. LiaoL. B. LiaoM. H. LiaoY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyA. LimphiratD. X. LinL. Q. LinT. LinB. J. LiuB. X. LiuC. X. LiuF. LiuF. H. LiuFeng LiuG. M. LiuH. LiuH. B. LiuH. M. LiuHuihui LiuJ. B. LiuJ. J. LiuK. LiuK. LiuK. Y. LiuKe LiuL. LiuL. C. LiuLu LiuM. H. LiuP. L. LiuQ. LiuS. B. LiuW. M. LiuW. T. LiuX. LiuX. K. LiuX. L. LiuX. Y. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. B. LiuZ. A. LiuZ. D. LiuZ. Q. LiuZ. Y. LiuX. C. LouH. J. LuJ. G. LuX. L. LuY. LuY. H. LuY. P. LuZ. H. LuC. L. LuoJ. R. LuoJ. S. LuoM. X. LuoT. LuoX. L. LuoZ. Y. LvX. R. LyuY. F. LyuY. H. LyuF. C. MaH. L. MaHeng MaJ. L. MaL. L. MaL. R. MaQ. M. MaR. Q. MaR. Y. MaT. MaX. T. MaX. Y. MaY. M. MaF. E. MaasI. MacKayM. MaggioraS. MaldeQ. A. MalikH. X. MaoY. J. MaoZ. P. MaoS. MarcelloA. MarshallF. M. MelendiY. H. MengZ. X. MengG. MezzadriH. MiaoT. J. MinR. E. MitchellX. H. MoB. MosesN. Yu. MuchnoiJ. MuskallaY. NefedovF. NerlingH. NeuwirthZ. NingS. NisarQ. L. NiuW. D. NiuY. NiuC. NormandS. L. OlsenQ. OuyangS. PacettiX. PanY. PanA. PathakY. P. PeiM. PelizaeusH. P. PengX. J. PengY. Y. PengK. PetersK. PetridisJ. L. PingR. G. PingS. PluraV. PrasadF. Z. QiH. R. QiM. QiS. QianW. B. QianC. F. QiaoJ. H. QiaoJ. J. QinJ. L. QinL. Q. QinL. Y. QinP. B. QinX. P. QinX. S. QinZ. H. QinJ. F. QiuZ. H. QuJ. RademackerC. F. RedmerA. RivettiM. RoloG. RongS. S. RongF. RosiniCh. RosnerM. Q. RuanN. SaloneA. SarantsevY. SchelhaasK. SchoenningM. ScodeggioW. ShanX. Y. ShanZ. J. ShangJ. F. ShangguanL. G. ShaoM. ShaoC. P. ShenH. F. ShenW. H. ShenX. Y. ShenB. A. ShiH. ShiJ. L. ShiJ. Y. ShiS. Y. ShiX. ShiH. L. SongJ. J. SongM. H. SongT. Z. SongW. M. SongY. X. SongZirong SongS. SosioS. SpataroS. StansilausF. StielerM. StolteS. S SuG. B. SunG. X. SunH. SunH. K. SunJ. F. SunK. SunL. SunR. SunS. S. SunT. SunW. Y. SunY. C. SunY. H. SunY. J. SunY. Z. SunZ. Q. SunZ. T. SunC. J. TangG. Y. TangJ. TangJ. J. TangL. F. TangY. A. TangL. Y. TaoM. TatJ. X. TengJ. Y. TianW. H. TianY. TianZ. F. TianI. UmanE. van der SmagtB. WangB. WangBo WangC. WangC. WangCong WangD. Y. WangH. J. WangH. R. WangJ. WangJ. J. WangJ. P. WangK. WangL. L. WangL. W. WangM. WangM. WangN. Y. WangS. WangShun WangT. WangT. J. WangW. WangW. P. WangX. WangX. F. WangX. L. WangX. N. WangXin WangY. WangY. D. WangY. F. WangY. H. WangY. J. WangY. L. WangY. N. WangY. N. WangYaqian WangYi WangYuan WangZ. WangZ. WangZ. L. WangZ. Q. WangZ. Y. WangZiyi WangD. WeiD. H. WeiH. R. WeiF. WeidnerS. P. WenU. WiednerG. WilkinsonM. WolkeJ. F. WuL. H. WuL. J. WuLianjie WuS. G. WuS. M. WuX. W. WuY. J. WuZ. WuL. XiaB. H. XiangD. XiaoG. Y. XiaoH. XiaoY. L. XiaoZ. J. XiaoC. XieK. J. XieY. XieY. G. XieY. H. XieZ. P. XieT. Y. XingC. J. XuG. F. XuH. Y. XuM. XuQ. J. XuQ. N. XuT. D. XuX. P. XuY. XuY. C. XuZ. S. XuF. YanL. YanW. B. YanW. C. YanW. H. YanW. P. YanX. Q. YanX. Q. YanY. Y. YanH. J. YangH. L. YangH. X. YangJ. H. YangR. J. YangY. YangY. H. YangY. Q. YangY. Z. YangZ. P. YaoM. YeM. H. YeZ. J. YeJunhao YinZ. Y. YouB. X. YuC. X. YuG. YuJ. S. YuL. W. YuT. YuX. D. YuY. C. YuY. C. YuC. Z. YuanH. YuanJ. YuanJ. YuanL. YuanM. K. YuanS. H. YuanY. YuanC. X. YueYing YueA. A. ZafarF. R. ZengS. H. ZengX. ZengYujie ZengY. J. ZengY. C. ZhaiY. H. ZhanShunan ZhangB. L. ZhangB. X. ZhangD. H. ZhangG. Y. ZhangG. Y. ZhangH. ZhangH. ZhangH. C. ZhangH. H. ZhangH. Q. ZhangH. R. ZhangH. Y. ZhangJ. ZhangJ. J. ZhangJ. L. ZhangJ. Q. ZhangJ. S. ZhangJ. W. ZhangJ. X. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Z. ZhangJianyu ZhangL. M. ZhangLei ZhangN. ZhangP. ZhangQ. ZhangQ. Y. ZhangR. Y. ZhangS. H. ZhangShulei ZhangX. M. ZhangX. Y. ZhangY. ZhangY. ZhangY. T. ZhangY. H. ZhangY. P. ZhangZ. D. ZhangZ. H. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. X. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZh. Zh. ZhangG. ZhaoJ. Y. ZhaoJ. Z. ZhaoL. ZhaoL. ZhaoM. G. ZhaoS. J. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoY. L. ZhaoY. P. ZhaoY. X. ZhaoZ. G. ZhaoA. ZhemchugovB. ZhengB. M. ZhengJ. P. ZhengW. J. ZhengX. R. ZhengY. H. ZhengB. ZhongC. ZhongH. ZhouJ. Q. ZhouS. ZhouX. ZhouX. K. ZhouX. R. ZhouX. Y. ZhouY. X. ZhouY. Z. ZhouA. N. ZhuJ. ZhuK. ZhuK. J. ZhuK. S. ZhuL. X. ZhuLin ZhuS. H. ZhuT. J. ZhuW. D. ZhuW. J. ZhuW. Z. ZhuY. C. ZhuZ. A. ZhuX. Y. ZhuangJ. H. Zouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22330v1Symbolic Classification-Enabled LHC Limits Online BSM Global Fits2026-05-21T11:19:27ZGlobal fits of Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) physics often involve a two-way interplay between theory and experiment. Theoretical models provide guidance for experimental searches, while experimental results, in turn, constrain theoretical frameworks. A crucial aspect of this feedback loop is the direct inclusion of measurements and exclusion limits ``online'' global fits, i.e. during the parameter scans aspects of the global fits. However, incorporating the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) limits into such analyses has been computationally prohibitive, often due to time taken per parameter point exceeding the scales acceptable for global fit frameworks. In this study, we show that LHC limits can be incorporated ``online'' global fits by leveraging approximations derived from symbolic regression techniques. We utilize a dataset of ATLAS constraints from searches for electroweakino productions to derive a mathematical expression capable of classifying the phenomenological Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (pMSSM) parameter space as allowed or excluded. This is subsequently incorporated for making a global fit of the pMSSM to data, including the LHC Run-2 limits.2026-05-21T11:19:27ZShehu AbdusSalamhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06415v2Identified charged hadron production in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 54.4 GeV with the STAR detector2026-05-21T06:06:15ZWe present results on the production of $π^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$, $p$, and $\bar{p}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 54.4~GeV using the STAR detector at RHIC, at midrapidity ($|y| <$ 0.1). Invariant yields of these particles as a function of transverse momentum are shown. We determine bulk properties such as integrated particle yields ($dN/dy$), mean transverse momentum ($\langle p_{T} \rangle$), particle ratios, which provide insight into the particle production mechanisms. Additionally, the kinetic freezeout parameters ($T_\text{kin}$ and $\langle β_{T} \rangle$), which provide information about the dynamics of the system at the time of freezeout, are obtained. The Bjorken energy density ($ε_{\rm{BJ}}$), which gives an estimate of the energy density in the central rapidity region of the collision zone at the formation time $τ$, is calculated and presented as a function of multiplicity for various energies. The results are compared with those from the models such as A Multi-Phase Transport (AMPT) and Heavy Ion Jet INteraction Generator (HIJING) for further insights.2025-12-06T12:18:13Z14 pages, 16 figuresPhysical Review C 113, 054907 (2026) STAR CollaborationB. E. AboonaJ. AdamG. AgakishievI. AggarwalM. M. AggarwalZ. AhammedA. AitbayevI. AlekseevE. AlpatovA. K. AlshammriA. AparinS. AslamJ. AtchisonG. S. AverichevV. BairathiX. BaoP. BarikK. BarishS. BeheraP. BhagatA. BhasinS. BhattaI. G. BordyuzhinJ. D. BrandenburgA. V. BrandinC. BroodoX. Z. CaiH. CainesM. Calderón de la Barca SánchezD. CebraJ. CeskaI. ChakaberiaY. S. ChangZ. ChangA. ChatterjeeD. ChenJ. H. ChenL. ChenQ. ChenW. ChenZ. ChenJ. ChengY. ChengW. ChristieX. ChuS. CoreyH. J. CrawfordG. Dale-GauA. DasD. De Souza LemosT. G. DedovichI. M. DeppnerA. A. DerevschikovA. DeshpandeA. DhamijaA. DimriP. DixitX. DongJ. L. DrachenbergE. DuckworthJ. C. DunlopY. S. El-FekyJ. EngelageG. EppleyS. EsumiO. EvdokimovO. EyserB. FanY. FangR. FatemiS. FazioH. FengY. FengE. FinchY. FisyakF. A. FlorB. FuC. FuT. FuT. GaoY. GaoG. GarciaF. GeurtsA. GibsonA. GiriK. GopalX. GouD. GrosnickA. GuJ. GuA. GuptaA. HamedR. J. HamiltonJ. HanX. HanM. D. HarastyJ. W. HarrisH. Harrison-SmithL. B. HavenerX. H. HeY. HeC. HuQ. HuY. HuH. HuangH. Z. HuangS. L. HuangT. HuangY. HuangY. HuangY. HuangM. IsshikiW. W. JacobsA. JalotraC. JenaY. JiJ. JiaX. JiangC. JinY. JinN. JindalX. JuE. G. JuddS. KabanaD. KalinkinJ. KangK. KangA. R. KanugantiD. KapukchyanK. KauderD. KeaneA. KechechyanM. KeslerA. KhanalA. KhanalJ. KimA. KiselevA. G. KnospeL. KochendaY. KongA. A. KorobitsinB. KorodiA. Yu. KraevaP. KravtsovL. KumarM. C. LabonteR. LaceyJ. M. LandgrafC. LarsonA. LebedevR. LednickyJ. H. LeeY. H. LeungC. LiD. LiH-S. LiH. LiH. LiH. LiW. LiX. LiX. LiY. LiZ. LiZ. LiX. LiangT. LinY. LinC. LiuG. LiuH. LiuL. LiuL. LiuZ. LiuZ. LiuT. LjubicicO. LomickyE. M. LoydT. LuJ. LuoX. F. LuoV. B. LuongL. MaR. MaY. G. MaN. MagdyR. ManikandhanO. MatonohaK. MenduliK. MiN. G. MinaevB. MohantyB. MondalM. M. MondalI. MooneyD. A. MorozovM. I. NagyC. J. NaimA. S. NainJ. D. NamM. NasimH. NasrullohE. NedorezovJ. M. NelsonM. NieG. NigmatkulovT. NiidaL. V. NogachT. NonakaG. OdyniecA. OgawaS. OhV. A. OkorokovK. OkuboB. S. PageM. PalS. PalA. PandavA. PandayA. K. PandeyY. PanebratsevT. PaniP. ParfenovA. PaulS. PaulC. PerkinsS. PingI. D. Ponce PintoM. PosikE. PottebaumA. PovarovS. ProdhanT. L. ProtzmanN. K. PruthiJ. PutschkeY. QiZ. QinH. QiuC. RaczS. K. RadhakrishnanA. RanaR. L. RayC. W. RobertsonO. V. RogachevskyM. A. Rosales AguilarD. RoyL. RuanA. K. SahooN. R. SahooH. SakoS. SalurS. S. SambyalE. SamigullinD. T. SamuelJ. K. SandhuS. SatoB. C. SchaeferN. SchmitzJ. SegerR. SetoP. SeybothN. ShahE. ShahalievP. V. ShanmuganathanT. ShaoM. SharmaN. SharmaR. SharmaS. R. SharmaA. I. SheikhD. ShenD. Y. ShenK. ShenS. ShiY. Shi ShilpaE. ShulgaF. SiJ. SinghS. SinghaP. SinhaM. J. SkobyY. SöhngenY. SongT. D. S. StanislausM. StrikhanovY. SuX. SunY. SunB. SurrowD. N. SviridaZ. W. SwegerA. C. TamisA. H. TangZ. TangA. TaranenkoT. TarnowskyJ. H. ThomasA. TimofeevD. TlustyM. V. TokarevD. Torres-ValladaresS. TrentalangeO. D. TsaiC. Y. TsangZ. TuJ. E. TylerT. UllrichD. G. UnderwoodG. Van BurenA. N. VasilievF. VidebækS. VokalS. A. VoloshinF. WangG. WangG. WangJ. S. WangJ. WangK. WangX. WangY. WangY. WangY. WangZ. WangZ. WangZ. WangJ. C. WebbP. C. WeidenkaffG. D. WestfallH. WiemanG. WilksS. W. WissinkC. P. WongJ. WuX. WuX. WuX. WuB. XiY. XiaoZ. G. XiaoG. XieW. XieH. XuN. XuQ. H. XuX. XuY. XuY. XuY. XuY. XuZ. XuZ. XuG. YanZ. YanC. YangQ. YangS. YangY. YangZ. YeZ. YeL. YiY. YuW. YuanW. ZhaC. ZhangD. ZhangJ. ZhangK. ZhangL. ZhangS. ZhangW. ZhangX. ZhangY. ZhangY. ZhangY. ZhangY. ZhangZ. ZhangZ. ZhangF. ZhaoJ. ZhaoS. ZhouY. ZhouC. ZhuX. ZhuM. ZurekM. Zyzak10.1103/4161-dflchttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13515v3Probing scalar-neutrino and scalar-dark-matter interactions with PandaX-4T2026-05-21T05:34:48ZScalar-mediated interactions may exist among neutrinos, dark matter particles, or between the two. Double $β$-decay experiments provide a powerful tool to probe such exotic interactions. Using $^{136}$Xe double $β$-decay data from PandaX-4T, we perform the first direct spectral search in the energy range of 20 to 2800~keV, setting the most stringent limits to date on scalar-mediated neutrino self-interactions for mediator masses below 2~MeV$/c^2$. These results place significant constraints on models invoking such interactions to alleviate the Hubble Tension. Assuming the same scalar also mediates dark matter self-interactions, constraints on the dark matter-scalar interactions can be placed in conjunction with cosmological constraints.2025-11-17T15:49:18Z PandaX CollaborationTao LiZihao BoWei ChenXun ChenYunhua ChenChen ChengXiangyi CuiManna DengYingjie FanDeqing FangXuanye FuZhixing GaoYujie GeLisheng GengKarl GiboniXunan GuoXuyuan GuoZichao GuoChencheng HanKe HanChangda HeJinrong HeHouqi HuangJunting HuangYule HuangRuquan HouXiangdong JiYonglin JuXiaorun LanChenxiang LiJiafu LiMingchuan LiPeiyuan LiShuaijie LiTao LiYangdong LiZhiyuan LiQing LinJianglai LiuYuanchun LiuCongcong LuXiaoying LuLingyin LuoYunyang LuoYugang MaYajun MaoYue MengBinyu PangNingchun QiZhicheng QianXiangxiang RenDong ShanXiaofeng ShangXiyuan ShaoGuofang ShenManbin ShenWenliang SunXuyan SunYi TaoYueqiang TianYuxin TianAnqing WangGuanbo WangHao WangHaoyu WangJiamin WangLei WangMeng WangQiuhong WangShaobo WangShibo WangSiguang WangWei WangXu WangZhou WangYuehuan WeiWeihao WuYuan WuMengjiao XiaoXiang XiaoYuhan XieKaizhi XiongJianqin XuYifan XuShunyu YaoBinbin YanXiyu YanYong YangPeihua YeChunxu YuYing YuanZhe YuanYouhui YunXinning ZengMinzhen ZhangPeng ZhangShibo ZhangSiyuan ZhangShu ZhangTao ZhangWei ZhangYang ZhangYingxin ZhangYuanyuan ZhangLi ZhaoKangkang ZhaoJifang ZhouJiaxu ZhouJiayi ZhouNing ZhouXiaopeng ZhouZhizhen ZhouChenhui ZhuYihong ZhongVan Que TranMichael J. Ramsey-Musolfhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21908v1Semileptonic sum rules in heavy-to-light charm decays2026-05-21T02:30:57ZWe investigate semileptonic sum rules in heavy-to-light charm decays, motivated by analogous relations in $b \to c$ and $b \to u$ transitions. Focusing on the $c \to d\overline{\ell}ν$ decays, $D \to π\overline{\ell}ν$, $D \to ρ\overline{\ell}ν$, and $Λ_c \to n\overline{\ell}ν$, we examine a relation among their lepton-flavor universality ratios $R_H^{μe}$. Although the charm sum rule is less precise than the relations in bottom-hadron decays, current low-energy and high-$p_T$ constraints on new physics restrict the actual deviation from the relation to below the percent level. The relation can therefore provide a useful consistency check of charm semileptonic measurements. As an application, we derive a prediction for the yet-unmeasured ratio $R_n^{μe}$ in $Λ_c \to n\overline{\ell}ν$.2026-05-21T02:30:57Z26 pages, 6 figures, 2 tablesMotoi EndoSyuhei IguroSatoshi MishimaTakeru UchiyamaRyoutaro Watanabehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21789v1Patch Hierarchical Attention Transformer for Efficient Particle Jet Tagging2026-05-20T22:31:21ZReal-time jet tagging is critical for identifying short-lived particle decays in the high-throughput detectors of the Large Hadron Collider, where real-time trigger systems responsible for deciding which collision events to store impose strict latency and accuracy constraints. While transformer architectures achieve the highest jet tagging accuracy when compute is unconstrained, their quadratic self-attention cost makes inference restrictive on trigger budget. Existing efficient variants reduce the computational cost, but hinder the classification performance. To address this limitation, we introduce the Patch Hierarchical Attention Transformer (PHAT-JeT), which combines two mechanisms: a physics-inspired geometric message-passing module that encodes local detector-plane structure, and a hierarchical patch-based attention scheme that computes exact attention within small particle groups while preserving global context through lightweight patch-token communication. Within a restricted budget, PHAT-JeT achieves state-of-the-art accuracy and background rejection among all resource-constrained jet tagging models on four benchmarks (\textsc{hls4ml}, JetClass, Top Tagging, and Quark--Gluon). Our code is available at https://github.com/aaronw5/PHAT-JeT.2026-05-20T22:31:21ZAaron WangZihan ZhaoAlan XiaChang SunAbhijith GandrakotaJennifer NgadiubaRichard CavanaughJavier Duartehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21721v1The Higgs-top-$Z$ mass coincidence relation after NNLO matching2026-05-20T20:26:42ZThe relation $M_H^2\simeq M_ZM_t$, previously proposed as a non-trivial Higgs mass coincidence, is reconsidered with present electroweak inputs and with a scheme-consistent matching analysis. With the 2025 PDG values for $M_Z$, $M_W$ and $M_H$, and the ATLAS-CMS direct top-mass combination, the pole-level ratio is $ρ_{Zt}=M_ZM_t/M_H^2=1.00362\pm0.00261$. Thus an exact pole-level geometric relation predicts either $M_H=125.426\pm0.120\,\mathrm{GeV}$ or $M_t=171.898\pm0.302\,\mathrm{GeV}$, which is still a $1.4σ$ test rather than an exclusion. By contrast, the companion arithmetic relation gives $ρ_{Wt}=(M_W+M_t)/(2M_H)=1.00994\pm0.00159$ and is not a viable exact mass sum rule. We then evaluate the complete NNLO weak-scale $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ matching formulae at $μ=M_t$. In the standard convention one obtains $\widehatρ_{Zt}(M_t)=\sqrt{g_2^2+g_Y^2}\,y_t/(4\sqrt2λ)=0.96714\pm0.00361$. Consequently, the exact running-coupling boundary condition $λ=g_Zy_t/(4\sqrt2)$ at the top scale would predict $M_H=123.19\pm0.20\,\mathrm{GeV}$, or equivalently $M_t=177.81\pm0.50\,\mathrm{GeV}$ when $M_H$ is held fixed. This is incompatible with the measured point. A possible symmetry explanation must therefore act on pole-level threshold quantities, or provide a finite matching factor $κ_{\rm th}=1.0340\pm0.0039$ at the electroweak scale. We formulate this requirement as a target for custodial/top-Higgs or triality-like symmetry extensions.2026-05-20T20:26:42ZE. Torrente-Lujanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21594v1Exploring the SMEFT landscape: Bayesian Model Selection for indirect discovery2026-05-20T18:00:06ZWe develop a framework for indirect discovery in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) based on Bayesian model selection over operator subsets. We argue that SMEFT should be understood as a structured space of competing hypotheses rather than a single high-dimensional model, with each operator subset corresponding to a physically distinct low-energy realisation of new dynamics. Bayesian inference is applied at the level of model space itself, assigning posterior probabilities to operator subsets and marginal inclusion probabilities to individual operators. A genetic algorithm efficiently navigates the high-dimensional discrete model space, concentrating evaluations in the high-posterior region, while the Bayesian Information Criterion provides a tractable approximation to the Bayesian evidence. We apply this framework to a dataset comprising electroweak precision observables from LEP and Higgs, top-quark, and diboson measurements from LHC Run 2, at both linear and quadratic order in the Wilson coefficients, with one-loop renormalisation group evolution systematically included. The analysis finds no statistically significant evidence for any departure from the SM, and demonstrates that Bayesian Model Average posteriors on Wilson coefficients carry substantially improved characterisation potential compared to traditional global fits. The operator correlation matrix encodes the relational structure of the model posterior, identifying operator pairs that co-appear in high-posterior models and flat directions where additional measurements would be most valuable. The sensitivity of all results to the choice of matching scale $μ_0$ is assessed, and its promotion to a continuous parameter of inference is identified as a natural extension of the framework.2026-05-20T18:00:06Z29 pages, 8 figuresLuca Mantanihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21590v1Precision physics at the muon collider: $m_W$ and CKM matrix elements2026-05-20T18:00:03ZWe examine the potential for a 10~TeV lepton collider to carry out precision measurements of the W boson mass and W boson couplings strength, i.e. the CKM matrix elements. We consider the several W boson production mechanisms and focus on the most copious at 10~TeV, that is effective $γW \to W$, a process viable at both opposite sign and same-sign leptonic colliders. We find that the leptonic W decay channel can hardly be competitive with present determinations, due to lack of rate. The hadronic channel has potential to improve over the current $\simeq$10~MeV from measurements at hadron colliders, motivating detector developments towards high-precision hadronic energy measurements. We find that the precision understanding of the detector response to hadrons can also lead to a determination of the CKM matrix elements. We expect determination of CKM matrix elements surpassing by far the present precision for couplings involving heavy quarks, notably $V_{cb}$, avoiding the present bottle-necks due to poor knowledge of hadronic matrix elements needed in low energy extractions of CKM matrix elements. Our findings motivate detector developments towards high-precision hadronic energy measurements and flavor tagging.2026-05-20T18:00:03Z24 pages, 9 figures, 5 tablesLudovica Aperio BellaRoberto FranceschiniFederico MeloniXing Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21583v1Echoes of Nucleon Decay from Long-Lived Particles2026-05-20T18:00:01ZNucleon decay searches provide uniquely sensitive probes of baryon number violation and physics beyond the Standard Model. We propose a new class of nucleon decay observables involving long-lived particles (LLPs), characterized by spatially separated but temporally correlated "echo" vertices not captured by conventional prompt searches. Focusing on vector LLPs, we construct effective operators and ultraviolet realizations, and show that Super-Kamiokande, Hyper-Kamiokande and JUNO can achieve geometric acceptances approaching 80% over a broad range of LLP decay lengths. Echo signatures could in principle arise from any visibly decaying LLP.2026-05-20T18:00:01Z5 pages + Supplemental Material, 7 figures, 3 tablesPatrick AdolfChandan HatiMartin HirschVolodymyr Takhistovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21452v1Sensitivity of the FCC-ee to axion-like particles at different center-of-mass energies2026-05-20T17:43:14ZThe sensitivity of the proposed FCC-ee collider to axion-like particles (ALPs) is investigated at all planned center-of-mass energies, with focus on the case where the ALP couples primarily to electroweak gauge bosons at leading order. We study the associated production of the ALP with a photon, with the ALP decaying in turn to two photons, yielding a three-photon final state. The ALP coupling to the photon is evaluated for ALP masses of 5 to 320 GeV. In this effective model, the FCC-ee will be able to detect ALPs for couplings down to a few $10^{-6} \mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$ ($10^{-5} \mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$) during the Z pole run (WW, ZH, and $t\bar{t}$ threshold runs). Additionally, this final state has the potential to probe the underlying electroweak structure of ALP couplings for ALP masses below the $Z$-boson mass.2026-05-20T17:43:14ZJuliette AlimenaElnura BakhishovaFreya BlekmanJannah Darwish AbdelhafizChristina DorofeevJeremi NiedzielaGiacomo PoleselloAnna PrzybylLovisa Rygaardhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04153v2Data-Driven Predictions for Dark Photon and Millicharged Particle Production2026-05-20T16:17:03ZAccurate signal predictions are essential for interpreting and optimizing fixed-target searches for new physics. Even in minimal models such as the dark photon ($A'$) or millicharged particles (mCPs), theoretical uncertainties in hadronic production can be substantial. We introduce a data-driven framework that predicts both the rate and kinematic distributions of $A'$ and mCP production directly from measured dilepton events, without relying on specific theoretical production models. This method uses the close correspondence between amplitudes for emission of $A'$ or mCPs, and for off-shell Standard Model photon production, the latter being experimentally measurable in full differential form. We demonstrate that normalizing flow models can learn these distributions from data and serve as a fast, realistic Monte Carlo generator for dark sector signal simulations.2025-12-03T19:00:00Z13 pages, 10 figures; matches published versionPhys. Rev. D 113, 095030 (2026)Elizabeth AllisonNikita Blinov10.1103/vzmz-jbckhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05419v2Significant noise improvement in a Kinetic Inductance Phonon-Mediated detector by use of a wideband parametric amplifier2026-05-20T16:11:56ZMicrowave Kinetic Inductance Detectors (MKIDs) have been demonstrated as capable phonon sensors when coupled to crystalline substrates, and have been proposed as detectors for next-generation rare-event searches such as for the direct detection of dark matter. These Kinetic Inductance Phonon Mediated (KIPM) detector designs, favoring large superconducting absorber volumes and high readout powers, are oftentimes limited in their sensitivity by low temperature amplifier noise introduced in the signal readout chain. We report here an effort to couple a wideband Kinetic Inductance Travelling Wave Parametric Amplifier (KI-TWPA), operated near the Standard Quantum Limit of minimal added amplifier noise, to sensors spanning a 70 MHz bandwidth at 3.5 GHz. This results in a ~5x improvement in the inferred detector energy resolution in the best sensor and highlights the potential of constructing O(100) meV resolving phonon-mediated particle detectors. We detail limitations introduced by lossy passive components, degraded RF responsivity, and microphysical noise sources like two-level systems (TLS), in achieving ultimate quantum-limited system noise levels.2024-02-08T05:20:22Z18 pages, 5 figuresJINST 21 (2026) P05025Karthik RamanathanOsmond WenTaylor AralisRitoban Basu ThakurBruce BumbleYen-Yung ChangPeter K. DayByeong Ho EomHenry G. LeDucBrandon J. SandovalRyan StephensonSunil R. Golwala10.1088/1748-0221/21/05/P05025http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21315v1Statistical sensitivity of neutrinoless double-beta decay exchange mechanism discrimination by tracking experiments2026-05-20T15:45:28ZReconstruction of the individual energies and the opening angle between the electrons emitted in neutrinoless double-beta decay can probe the nature of the beyond-the-Standard-Model exchange mechanism that underlies the process. Although it is often stated that discrimination of the mechanism would require such measurements to be performed with high statistics, we show that this is not the case. If a single mechanism dominates the process, its discrimination at the 1$σ$ level is already achieved with just a few well-reconstructed events; only $\sim$10 such events are required to reach 3$σ$-level discovery sensitivity. In the presence of realistic reconstruction uncertainties, this requirement increases to $\sim$25 events, indicating that substantial discrimination power is retained as long as backgrounds remain small. We conclude that the pursuit of tracking detectors for exchange-mechanism discrimination remains valuable even for ``discovery-class'' experiments in which only a few signal counts are expected.2026-05-20T15:45:28ZJason DetwilerKe HanTao Li