https://arxiv.org/api/s6B1ySzvfHE5nF7YHXrWGYn1ZxM2026-03-22T11:40:31Z595273015http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18099v1A search for lepton-flavour violating $τ\to 3μ$ decays with the ATLAS detector2026-03-18T11:20:55ZA search for charged lepton flavour violation in $τ\to 3μ$ decays is performed in $pp$ collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV using ATLAS data collected between 2016 and 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 $\text{fb}^{-1}$. The search focuses on the electroweak $W \to τν$ production channel. Data are collected using two-muon and three-muon triggers and a multivariate analysis is used to separate the signal from the background. An unbinned likelihood fit is then performed to the resulting three-muon invariant mass spectrum and the data are found to be compatible with the background-only hypothesis. The observed (expected) limit on the branching ratio $B(τ\to3μ)$ is found to be $8.7\times 10^{-8}$ ($7.5\times 10^{-8}$) at $90\%$ CL.2026-03-18T11:20:55Z37 pages in total, author list starting page 20, 4 figures, 3 tables, submitted to Phy. Lett. B. All figures including auxiliary figures are available a https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/BPHY-2018-05 ATLAS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17602v1Search for Sterile Neutrinos with CUPID-02026-03-18T11:15:58ZSterile neutrinos are well-motivated extensions of the Standard Model, introduced to address fundamental questions such as the origin of neutrino masses and the nature of dark matter. Exploiting the precise data reconstruction achieved by the CUPID-0 experiment, we searched for spectral distortions in the double $β$-decay of $^{82}$Se compatible with the emission of a sterile neutrino. The analysis relies on the construction of a detailed background model down to 200 keV, enabling an accurate characterization of the main sources of contamination. Using a Zn$^{82}$Se exposure of 9.95 kg$\cdot$yr, we explored sterile neutrino mass hypotheses between 0.5 MeV and 1.5 MeV. No evidence for a signal was observed in any scenario; therefore, we derived 90% C.I. upper limits on the active-sterile mixing probability $\sin^2θ$, obtaining the most stringent bound, $\sin^2θ<8\times 10^{-3}$, for a sterile neutrino mass of 0.7 MeV.2026-03-18T11:15:58ZO. AzzoliniJ. W. BeemanF. BelliniM. BerettaM. BiassoniC. BrofferioC. BucciS. CapelliV. CaraccioloL. CardaniP. CarnitiN. CasaliE. CeliD. ChiesaM. ClemenzaI. ColantoniO. CremonesiA. CrucianiA. D'AddabboI. DafineiS. Di DomizioF. FerroniL. GironiA. GiulianiP. GorlaC. GottiL. GráfG. KeppelJ. KotilaM. MartinezS. NagornyM. NastasiS. NisiC. NonesD. OrlandiL. PagnaniniM. PallaviciniL. PattavinaM. PavanG. PessinaL. PetrilloV. PettinacciS. PietrarotaS. PirroS. PozziE. PrevitaliA. PuiuA. RessaC. RusconiK. SchäffnerC. TomeiM. VignatiA. S. Zolotarovahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17556v1Characterization of Deconvolution-Based PMT Waveform Reconstruction Under Large Charge Dynamic Range and Varying Scintillation Time Profiles2026-03-18T10:03:36ZPhotomultiplier tubes (PMTs) are widely used as photon sensors for neutrino and dark matter detection. Accurate charge and time information extracted from PMT waveforms is crucial for event reconstruction. An algorithm based on deconvolution technology was proposed and applied to the reconstruction of PMT waveforms. This study further investigated the reliability of the deconvolution algorithm when handling a large charge dynamic range (0-200 photoelectrons), varying scintillation time profiles, and muon-induced large signals. Monte Carlo data confirmed that the deconvolution algorithm exhibits relatively stable reconstruction performance: the residual non-linearity of charge reconstruction is controlled to approximately 1\% over the range of 0 to 200 photoelectrons for various configurations of undershoots and scintillation time profiles, and the algorithm is capable of handling muon-induced large signals.2026-03-18T10:03:36ZXingyi LinJinghuan XuYongbo HuangJingzhe TangTianying XiaoYingke Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17503v1Pseudoscalar and vector toponia in a Dyson--Schwinger--Bethe--Salpeter framework2026-03-18T09:06:14ZWe study the pseudoscalar ($J^{PC}=0^{-+}$) and vector ($1^{--}$) top--antitop (toponium) systems within the rainbow--ladder truncation of the Dyson--Schwinger and Bethe--Salpeter equations, employing the Qin--Chang effective interaction. After validating the framework in the charmonium and bottomonium sectors, we extend it consistently to the top sector, incorporating renormalisation-group running of the current quark mass and a careful treatment of the number of active flavours. We compute masses and leptonic decay constants for $N_f=5$ and $6$, then analyse their dependence on the renormalisation scale in the range $μ=400-800\,\text{GeV}$. The resulting toponium masses lie near $344-346\,\text{GeV}$ with hyperfine splittings below $0.14-0.17\,\text{GeV}$, while the decay constants are large, $6-7\,\text{GeV}$, and exhibit the expected heavy-quark scaling behaviour. We find only mild sensitivity to the renormalisation point and a systematic reduction of binding when increasing $N_f$. Although the physical top quark decays weakly before hadronisation, our results demonstrate that, within a Poincaré-covariant nonperturbative framework, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) generates tightly correlated pseudoscalar and vector toponium systems in that extreme heavy-quark limit.2026-03-18T09:06:14Z8 pages, 5 tablesH. -R. ZhangZ. -F. CuiJ. Segoviahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17496v1A Continuum Schwinger Method to Study the Pion's Generalized Parton Distribution2026-03-18T08:57:31ZGeneralised Parton Distributions (GPDs) provide multidimensional insight into hadron structure and are particularly relevant for the pion, whose dynamics are intimately linked to chiral symmetry breaking. We introduce a novel modelling strategy for pion GPDs that satisfies all QCD constraints by construction: support, polynomiality, positivity, and the soft-pion theorem. The approach is illustrated with a simple algebraic model, which is evolved and used to compute deeply virtual Compton scattering (DVCS) Compton Form Factors at next-to-leading order. Our results indicate that gluons dominate the pion response at the Electron Ion Collider kinematics.2026-03-18T08:57:31ZSubmitted to the proceedings of the Excited QCD Workshop 2026, APP-B formatJ. M. Morgado-ChávezJ. SegoviaF. de SotoJ. Rodríguez-QuinteroV. BertoneM. DefurneC. MezragH. Moutardehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19290v3Optimal operating parameters for next-generation xenon gas time projection chambers2026-03-17T22:12:22ZThe next-generation of $0νββ$ searches are targeting half-life sensitivities towards 10$^{27}$--10$^{28}$ years. Gaseous xenon time projection chamber (GXeTPC) detectors may be able to meet this challenge due to their excellent energy resolution and background rejection power through event visualization. This paper explores how the design choices of a next-generation GXeTPC time projection chamber can impact the overall performance of the experiment. We study the performance of systems using xenon enriched in the isotope $^{136}$Xe or natural xenon, focusing on scenarios that incorporate one tonne of $^{136}$Xe isotope. The detector size, copper shielding mass, energy resolution, density and corresponding levels of diffusion are surveyed to evaluate the overall performance dependencies on these parameters. A detector optimized for using enriched xenon is preferred over natural, due primarily to a factor of 10 lower background rate driven by the large intrinsic backgrounds introduced by the copper shielding used in the detector. The performance of three types of gas TPC technologies was also explored based on different gas additives used to reduce diffusion to different levels. For all TPC technologies, we find background rates of a fraction of a count per tonne year in the region of interest are achievable. These performance levels are contingent on suitable energy resolution and event position placement in the drift direction being achieved for the specific detector technology. Performance for enriched xenon TPCs varies mildly with pressure in the range 5 to 25 bars, reaching background levels below 0.2 events/tonne-year. Performance at one bar is worse by approximately a factor of four. When considerations for the construction of the detector in addition to the selection performance are included, there may be no clearly optimum pressure.2025-12-22T11:31:52Z28 pages, 16 figures; v3 after journal reviewK. MistryY. MeiD. R. Nygrenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10860v2First measurement of the decay-time-integrated $C\!P$ asymmetry in $B_s^0 \to D_s^- π^+$ decays2026-03-17T20:27:01ZA measurement of the flavour-untagged decay-time-integrated ${C\!P}$ asymmetry in the flavour-specific decay ${B_s^0 \to D_s^-π^+}$, ${\langle A^s_{\rm untagged}\rangle}$, is performed using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment between 2016 and 2018 at a center-of-mass energy of ${13\,{\rm TeV}}$, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of ${5.4\,{\rm fb}^{-1}}$. The ${C\!P}$ asymmetry is measured in two $D_s^-$ meson decay modes, ${D_s^- \to K^-K^+π^-}$ and ${D_s^- \to π^-π^+π^-}$. The combined result, $\langle A^s_{\rm untagged}\rangle = ( -1.4 \pm 5.9\,\rm{(stat)} \pm 1.1\,\rm{(syst)}) \times 10^{-3}$, is consistent with the Standard Model expectation and provides a direct constraint on new physics in tree-level $b$-hadron decays.2026-03-11T15:10:18ZAll figures and tables, along with any supplementary material and additional information, are available at https://lbfence.cern.ch/alcm/public/analysis/full-details/4515/ (LHCb public pages) LHCb collaborationR. AaijM. AbdelfatahA. S. W. AbdelmottelebC. Abellan BetetaF. AbudinénT. AckernleyA. A. AdefisoyeB. AdevaM. AdinolfiP. AdlarsonC. AgapopoulouC. A. AidalaZ. AjaltouniS. AkarK. AkibaP. AlbicoccoJ. AlbrechtR. AleksiejunasF. AlessioP. Alvarez CartelleR. AmalricS. AmatoJ. L. AmeyY. AmhisL. AnL. AnderliniM. AnderssonP. AndreolaM. AndreottiS. Andres EstradaA. AnelliD. AoC. ArataF. ArchilliZ. AregM. ArgentonS. Arguedas CuendisL. ArnoneM. ArtusoE. AslanidesR. Ataíde Da SilvaM. AtzeniB. AudurierJ. A. AuthierD. BacherI. Bachiller PereaS. BachmannM. BachmayerJ. J. BackZ. B. BaiP. Baladron RodriguezV. BalaguraA. BalboniW. BaldiniZ. BaldwinL. BalzaniH. BaoJ. Baptista de Souza LeiteC. Barbero PretelM. BarbettiI. R. BarbosaR. J. BarlowM. BarnyakovS. BarsukW. BarterJ. BartzS. BashirB. BatsukhP. B. BattistaA. BavarcheeA. BayA. BeckM. BeckerF. BedeschiI. B. BediagaN. A. BehlingS. BelinA. BellavistaI. BelovI. BelyaevG. BenaneG. BencivenniE. Ben-HaimR. BernetA. BertolinF. BettiJ. BexO. BezshyykoS. BhattacharyaM. S. BiekerN. V. BiesuzA. BiolchiniM. BirchF. C. R. BishopA. BitadzeA. BizzetiT. BlakeF. BlancJ. E. BlankS. BluskJ. A. BoelhauveO. Boente GarciaT. BoettcherA. BohareC. BolognaniR. BolzonellaR. B. BonacciA. BordeliusF. BorgatoS. BorghiM. BorsatoJ. T. BorsukE. BottalicoS. A. BouchibaM. BovillT. J. V. BowcockA. BoyerC. BozziJ. D. BrandenburgA. Brea RodriguezN. BreerC. BreitfeldJ. BrodzickaJ. BrownD. BrunduE. BuchananM. Burgos MarcosC. BurrC. ButiJ. S. ButterJ. BuytaertW. ByczynskiS. CadedduH. CaiY. CaiA. CailletR. CalabreseL. CaleficeM. CalviM. Calvo GomezP. Camargo MagalhaesJ. I. Cambon BouzasP. CampanaA. C. CamposA. F. Campoverde QuezadaY. CaoS. CapelliM. CaporaleL. CapriottiR. Caravaca-MoraA. CarboneL. Carcedo SalgadoR. CardinaleA. CardiniP. CarnitiL. CarusA. Casais VidalR. CasparyG. CasseM. CattaneoG. CavalleroV. CavalliniS. CelaniI. CelestinoS. CesareA. J. ChadwickI. ChahrourM. CharlesPh. CharpentierE. ChatzianagnostouR. CheaibM. ChefdevilleC. ChenJ. ChenS. ChenZ. ChenA. Chen HuM. CherifA. ChernovS. ChernyshenkoX. ChiotopoulosG. ChizhikV. ChobanovaM. ChrzaszczV. ChulikovP. CiambroneX. Cid VidalG. CiezarekP. CifraP. E. L. ClarkeM. ClemencicH. V. CliffJ. ClosierC. Cocha ToapaxiV. CocoJ. CoganE. CognerasL. CojocariuS. CollavitiP. CollinsT. ColomboM. ColonnaA. Comerma-MontellsL. CongedoJ. ConnaughtonA. ContuN. CookeG. CordovaC. CoronelI. CorredoiraA. CorreiaG. CortiG. C. CostantinoJ. Cottee MeldrumB. CouturierD. C. CraikN. CrepetM. Cruz TorresM. Cubero CamposE. Curras RiveraR. CurrieC. L. Da SilvaX. DaiE. Dall'OccoJ. DalsenoC. D'AmbrosioJ. DanielG. DarzeA. DavidsonJ. E. DaviesO. De Aguiar FranciscoC. De AngelisF. De BenedettiJ. de BoerK. De BruynS. De CapuaM. De CianU. De Freitas Carneiro Da GracaE. De LuciaJ. M. De MirandaL. De PaulaM. De SerioP. De SimoneF. De VellisJ. A. de VriesF. DebernardisD. DecampS. DekkersL. Del BuonoB. DelaneyJ. DengV. DenysenkoO. DeschampsF. DettoriB. DeyP. Di NezzaS. DingY. DingL. DittmannA. D. DochevaA. DohenyC. DongF. DordeiA. C. dos ReisA. D. DowlingL. DreyfusW. DuanP. DudaL. DufourV. DukP. DuranteM. M. DurasJ. M. DurhamO. D. DurmusA. DziurdaS. EasoE. EcksteinU. EgedeS. EisenhardtE. EjopuL. EklundM. ElashriD. Elizondo BlancoJ. EllbrachtS. ElyA. EneJ. EschleT. EvansF. FabianoS. FaghihL. N. FalcaoB. FangR. FantechiL. FantiniM. FariaK. FarmerF. FassinD. FazziniL. FelkowskiC. FengM. FengA. Fernandez CasaniM. Fernandez GomezA. D. FernezF. FerrariF. Ferreira RodriguesM. FerrilloM. Ferro-LuzziR. A. FiniM. FioriniM. FirlejK. L. FischerD. S. FitzgeraldC. FitzpatrickT. FiutowskiF. FleuretA. FominM. FontanaL. A. ForemanR. FortyD. Foulds-HoltV. Franco LimaM. Franco SevillaM. FrankE. FranzosoG. FrauC. FreiD. A. FridayJ. FuQ. FühringT. FulghesuG. GalatiM. D. GalatiA. Gallas TorreiraD. GalliS. GambettaM. GandelmanP. GandiniB. GanieH. GaoR. GaoT. Q. GaoY. GaoY. GaoY. GaoL. M. Garcia MartinP. Garcia MorenoJ. García PardiñasP. GardnerL. GarridoC. GasparA. GavrikovL. L. GerkenE. GersabeckM. GersabeckT. GershonS. GhizzoZ. GhorbanimoghaddamF. I. GiasemisV. GibsonH. K. GiemzaA. L. GilmanM. GiovannettiA. GioventùL. GirardeyM. A. GizaF. C. GlaserV. V. GligorovC. GöbelL. Golinka-BezshyykoE. GolobardesA. GolutvinS. Gomez FernandezW. GomulkaF. Goncalves AbrantesI. Gonçales VazM. GoncerzG. GongJ. A. GoodingC. GottiE. GovorkovaJ. P. GrabowskiL. A. Granado CardosoE. GraugésE. GraveriniL. GrazetteG. GrazianiA. T. GrecuN. A. GrieserL. GrilloC. GuM. GuariseL. GuerryA. -K. GuseinovY. GuzT. GysK. HabermannT. HadavizadehC. HadjivasiliouG. HaefeliC. HaenS. HakenG. HallettP. M. HamiltonQ. HanX. HanS. Hansmann-MenzemerN. HarnewT. J. HarrisM. HartmannS. HashmiJ. HeN. HeatleyA. HedesF. HemmerC. HendersonR. HendersonR. D. L. HendersonA. M. HennequinK. HennessyJ. HerdP. Herrero GasconJ. HeuelA. HeynA. HicheurG. Hijano MendizabalJ. HorswillR. HouY. HouD. C. HoustonN. HowarthW. HuX. HuW. HulsbergenR. J. HunterD. HutchcroftM. IdzikP. IltenA. IohnerH. JageS. J. Jaimes EllesS. JakobsenT. JakoubekE. JansA. JawaheryC. JayaweeraA. JelavicV. JevticZ. JiaE. JiangX. JiangY. JiangY. J. JiangE. Jimenez MoyaN. JindalM. JohnA. John Rubesh RajanD. JohnsonC. R. JonesS. JoshiB. JostJ. Juan CastellaN. JurikI. JuszczakK. KalecinskaD. KaminarisS. KandybeiM. KaneY. KangC. KarM. KaracsonA. KauniskangasJ. W. KautzM. K. KazaneckiF. KeizerM. KenzieT. KetelB. KhanjiS. KholodenkoG. KhreichF. KirazT. KirnV. S. KirsebomS. KlaverN. KleijneA. KleimenovaD. K. KlekotsK. KlimaszewskiM. R. KmiecT. KnospeR. KolbS. KoliievL. KolkA. KonoplyannikovP. KopciewiczP. KoppenburgA. KorchinI. KostiukO. KotS. KotriakhovaE. KowalczykO. KravcovM. KrepsW. KrupaW. KrzemienO. KshyvanskyiS. KubisM. KucharczykA. KupscV. KushnirB. KutsenkoJ. KvapilI. KyryllinD. LacarrereP. Laguarta GonzalezA. LaiA. LampisD. LancieriniC. Landesa GomezJ. J. LaneG. LanfranchiC. LangenbruchJ. LangerT. LathamF. LazzariC. LazzeroniR. Le GacH. LeeR. LefèvreM. LehurauxE. Lemos CidO. LeroyT. LesiakE. D. LesserB. LeveringtonA. LiC. LiC. LiH. LiJ. LiK. LiL. LiP. LiP. -R. LiQ. LiT. LiT. LiY. LiY. LiY. LiZ. LianQ. LiangX. LiangZ. LiangS. LibralonA. LightbodyC. LinT. LinR. LindnerH. LintonR. LitvinovD. LiuF. L. LiuG. LiuK. LiuS. LiuW. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. L. LiuG. Loachamin OrdonezI. LoboA. Lobo SalviaA. LoiT. LongF. C. L. LopesJ. H. LopesA. Lopez HuertasC. Lopez IribarnegarayQ. LuC. LucarelliD. LucchesiM. Lucio MartinezY. LuoA. LupatoM. LupbergerE. LuppiK. LynchS. LyuX. -R. LyuH. MaS. MaccoliniF. MachefertF. MaciucB. MackI. MackayL. M. MackeyL. R. Madhan MohanM. J. MaduraiD. MagdalinskiJ. J. MalczewskiS. MaldeL. MalentaccaG. MancaG. MancinelliC. MancusoR. Manera EscaleroA. MangalasseriF. M. ManganellaD. ManuzziS. MaoD. MarangottoJ. F. MarchandR. MarchevskiU. MarconiE. MarianiS. MarianiC. Marin BenitoJ. MarksA. M. MarshallL. MartelG. MartelliG. MartellottiL. MartinazzoliM. MartinelliD. Martinez GomezD. Martinez SantosF. Martinez VidalA. Martorell i GranollersA. MassafferriR. MatevA. MathadC. MatteuzziK. R. MattioliA. MauriE. MauriceJ. MauricioP. MayencourtJ. Mazorra de CosM. MazurekD. Mazzanti TaranconM. McCannN. T. McHughA. McNabR. McNultyB. MeadowsD. MelnychukD. Mendoza GranadaP. Menendez Valdes PerezF. M. MengM. MerkA. MerliL. Meyer GarciaD. MiaoH. MiaoM. MikhasenkoD. A. MilanesA. MinottiE. MinucciB. MitreskaD. S. MitzelR. MocanuA. ModakL. MoeserR. D. MoiseE. F. Molina CardenasT. MombächerM. MonkT. MonnardS. MonteilA. Morcillo GomezG. MorelloM. J. MorelloM. P. MorgenthalerA. MoroJ. MoronW. MorrenA. B. MorrisA. G. MorrisR. MountainZ. MuE. MuhammadF. MuheimM. MulderK. MüllerF. Muñoz-RojasV. MytrochenkoP. NaikT. NakadaR. NandakumarG. NapoletanoI. NastevaM. NeedhamN. NeriS. NeubertN. NeufeldJ. NicoliniD. NicotraE. M. NielL. NisiQ. NiuB. K. NjokiP. NogarolliP. NoggaC. NormandJ. Novoa FernandezG. NowakC. NunezH. N. NurA. Oblakowska-MuchaT. OeserO. OkhrimenkoR. OldemanF. OlivaE. Olivart PinoM. OloccoR. H. O'NeilJ. S. Ordonez SotoD. OsthuesJ. M. Otalora GoicocheaP. OwenA. OyangurenO. OzcelikF. PaciollaA. PadeeK. O. PadekenB. PagareT. PajeroA. PalanoL. PaliniM. PalutanC. PanX. PanS. PanebiancoS. PaniskakiL. PaolucciA. PapanestisM. PappagalloL. L. PappalardoC. PappenheimerC. ParkesD. ParmarG. PassalevaD. PassaroA. PastoreM. PatelJ. PatocC. PatrignaniA. PaulC. J. PawleyA. PellegrinoJ. PengX. PengM. Pepe AltarelliS. PerazziniH. Pereira Da CostaM. Pereira MartinezA. Pereiro CastroC. PerezP. PerretA. PerrevoortA. PerroM. J. PetersK. PetridisA. PetroliniS. PezzuloJ. P. PfallerH. PhamL. PicaM. PicciniL. PiccoloB. PietrzykR. N. PilatoD. PinciF. PisaniM. PizzichemiV. M. PlacintaM. Plo CasasusT. PoeschlF. PolciM. Poli LenerA. PoluektovI. PolyakovE. PolycarpoS. PonceD. PopovK. PoppK. PrasanthC. ProuveD. ProvenzanoV. PugatchA. Puicercus GomezG. PunziJ. R. PybusQ. QianW. QianN. QinR. QuaglianiR. I. Rabadan TrejoR. RaczJ. H. RademackerM. RamaM. Ramírez GarcíaV. Ramos De OliveiraM. Ramos PernasM. S. RangelG. RavenM. Rebollo De MiguelF. RediJ. ReichF. ReissZ. RenP. K. ResmiM. Ribalda GalvezR. RibattiG. RicartD. RiccardiS. RicciardiK. RichardsonM. Richardson-SlipperF. RiehnK. RinnertP. RobbeG. RobertsonE. RodriguesA. Rodriguez AlvarezE. Rodriguez FernandezJ. A. Rodriguez LopezE. Rodriguez RodriguezJ. RoenschA. RogovskiyD. L. RolfP. RoloffV. RomanovskiyA. Romero VidalG. RomoliniF. RonchettiT. RongM. RotondoM. S. RudolphM. Ruiz DiazR. A. Ruiz FernandezJ. Ruiz VidalJ. J. Saavedra-AriasJ. J. Saborido SilvaS. E. R. Sacha Emile R.D. SahooN. SahooB. SaittaM. SalomoniI. SanderswoodR. SantacesariaC. Santamarina RiosM. SantimariaL. SantoroE. SantovettiA. SaputiA. SarnatskiyG. SarpisM. SarpisC. SatrianoA. SattaM. SaurH. SazakF. SborzacchiA. ScarabottoS. SchaelS. ScherlM. SchillerH. SchindlerM. SchmellingB. SchmidtN. SchmidtS. SchmittH. SchmitzO. SchneiderA. SchopperN. SchulteM. H. SchuneG. SchweringB. SciasciaA. SciuccatiG. ScrivenI. SegalS. SellamT. SengerM. Senghi SoaresA. SergiN. SerraL. SestiniB. Sevilla SanjuanY. ShangD. M. ShangaseR. S. SharmaL. ShchutskaT. ShearsJ. ShenZ. ShenS. ShengB. ShiJ. ShiQ. ShiW. S. ShiE. ShmaninR. Silva CoutinhoG. SimiS. SimoneM. SinghaI. SiralN. SkidmoreT. SkwarnickiM. W. SlaterE. SmithM. SmithL. Soares LavraM. D. SokoloffF. J. P. SolerA. SolominK. SolovievaN. S. SommerfeldR. SongY. SongY. SongY. S. SongF. L. Souza De AlmeidaB. Souza De PaulaK. M. SowaE. Spadaro NorellaE. SpedicatoJ. G. SpeerP. SpradlinF. StagniM. StahlS. StahlS. StanislausM. StefaniakO. SteinkampY. SuF. SuljikJ. SunJ. SunL. SunD. SundfeldW. SutcliffeP. SvihraV. SvintozelskyiK. SwientekF. SwystunA. SzabelskiT. SzumlakY. TanY. TangY. T. TangM. D. TatJ. A. Teijeiro JimenezF. TerzuoliF. TeubertE. ThomasD. J. D. ThompsonA. R. Thomson-StrongH. TilquinV. TisserandS. T'JampensM. TobinT. T. TodorovL. TomassettiG. TonaniX. TongT. TorkL. ToscanoD. Y. TouC. TripplG. TuciN. TuningL. H. UeckerA. UklejaD. J. UnverzagtA. UpadhyayB. UrbachA. UsachovU. UwerV. VagnoniA. VaitkeviciusV. Valcarce CadenasG. ValentiN. Valls CanudasJ. van EldikH. Van HeckeE. van HerwijnenC. B. Van HulseR. Van LaakM. van VeghelG. VasquezR. Vazquez GomezP. Vazquez RegueiroC. Vázquez SierraS. VecchiJ. Velilla SernaJ. J. VelthuisM. VeltriA. VenkateswaranM. VerdogliaM. VesterinenW. VetensD. Vico BenetP. Vidrier VillalbaM. Vieites DiazX. Vilasis-CardonaE. Vilella FiguerasA. VillaP. VincentB. VivacquaF. C. VolleD. vom BruchK. VosC. VrahasJ. WagnerJ. WalshN. WalterE. J. WaltonG. WanA. WangB. WangC. WangG. WangH. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangM. WangN. W. WangR. WangX. WangX. WangX. W. WangY. WangY. WangY. H. WangZ. WangZ. WangJ. A. WardM. WaterlaatN. K. WatsonD. WebsdaleY. WeiZ. WeidaJ. WendelB. D. C. WesthenryC. WhiteM. WhiteheadE. WhiterA. R. WiederholdD. WiednerM. A. WiegertjesC. WildG. WilkinsonM. K. WilkinsonM. WilliamsM. J. WilliamsM. R. J. WilliamsR. WilliamsS. WilliamsZ. WilliamsF. F. WilsonM. WinnW. WislickiM. WitekL. WitolaT. WolfE. WoodG. WormserS. A. WottonH. WuJ. WuX. WuY. WuZ. WuK. WyllieS. XianZ. XiangY. XieT. X. XingA. XuL. XuM. XuR. XuZ. XuZ. XuZ. XuS. YadavK. YangX. YangY. YangY. YangZ. YangZ. YangH. YeungH. YinX. YinC. Y. YuJ. YuX. YuanY YuanJ. A. Zamora SaaM. ZavertyaevM. ZdybalF. ZenesiniC. ZengM. ZengS. H ZengC. ZhangD. ZhangJ. ZhangL. ZhangR. ZhangS. ZhangS. L. ZhangY. ZhangZ. ZhangY. ZhaoA. ZhelezovS. Z. ZhengX. Z. ZhengY. ZhengT. ZhouX. ZhouV. ZhovkovskaL. Z. ZhuX. ZhuX. ZhuY. ZhuV. ZhukovJ. ZhuoD. ZulianiG. Zunicahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03307v2Searching for HWW Anomalous Couplings with Simulation-Based Inference2026-03-17T18:10:42ZUnderstanding the source of the universe's asymmetry between matter and antimatter is one of the major open questions in particle physics. In this work, the sensitivity of novel machine-learning-based inference techniques to CP-odd and CP-even $HWW$ anomalous couplings is studied in the $\\WH \rightarrow \ell νb\bar{b}$ channel ($\ell = e, μ$), within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) framework. Two machine-learning simulation-based inference (SBI) methods are explored: a per-event likelihood-ratio estimator, which directly approximates the ratio of probability densities between competing hypotheses, is benchmarked against a per-event optimal-observable estimator optimized for sensitivity to the parameters of interest. Both approaches are also compared to traditional summary statistics, in this case histograms of kinematic and angular observables, as commonly used in experimental analyses. SBI methods provide tighter constraints than one-dimensional summary statistics, though their performance is comparable to two-dimensional histogram analysis. The optimal-observable approach remains promising for its ability to probe multiple couplings simultaneously. Restricting the analysis to a region of high $S/B$ also enhances sensitivity to CP-odd operators while preserving sensitivity to CP-even operators, which histogram analyses often lose. Although the likelihood-ratio estimator sometimes struggles with likelihood minima and shapes, optimisations that target its robustness could make it more sensitive than both the optimal-observable estimator and the histogram method. These results underscore the potential of advanced simulation-based inference techniques, encouraging further exploration with LHC Run 3 data to surpass current ATLAS and CMS sensitivities.2025-09-03T13:39:11ZPhysical Review D 113, 056011 (2026)Marta SilvaRicardo BarruéInês OchoaPatricia Conde Muíño10.1103/29xq-b66rhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16998v1Is the Turner Window Open? Seeking Closure with Resonant Absorption of Galactic Axions in NaI Dark Matter Detectors2026-03-17T18:00:02ZMotivated by the DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation signal, the dark matter community has invested heavily in ultra-clean underground NaI detectors to search for light WIMPs. We point out a new target of opportunity for these detectors -- axions produced by the carbon-burning stars within our galaxy. These stars synthesize large quantities of $^{23}$Na, keeping it at temperatures $\sim 10^9$K for periods up to tens of thousands of years. Under these conditions, $^{23}$Na radiates 440 keV axions through repeated photo-excitation and axio-deexcitation of its first excited state. Upon reaching a NaI detector, the process is reversed: the axion is resonantly absorbed, producing a 440 keV deexcitation photon. NaI thus serves as both $γ$ source and $γ$ detector. We find that existing NaI detectors can probe axion-nucleon couplings $|g_{aNN}^\mathrm{eff~^{23}Na}| \approx g_{app} \sim 10^{-6}$--$10^{-2}$, including QCD axions with $m_a \gtrsim 10$ eV. While there are several astrophysical constraints on axions with these couplings, our re-examination of these bounds shows that substantial gaps remain, providing strong motivation for the proposed searches.2026-03-17T18:00:02Zv1: 7 pages, 2 figuresW. C. HaxtonXing LiuAnupam RayEvan Rulehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16996v1Higher-point Energy Correlators: Factorization in the Back-to-Back Limit & Non-perturbative Effects2026-03-17T18:00:01ZN-point energy correlators are powerful observables for studying strong interactions, with applications ranging from extractions of the strong coupling $α_s$ to probes of jet modification in heavy-ion collisions and determination of the top-quark mass. Their practical use has, however, been limited by the complicated phase space for large N. Using a recently introduced parametrization that simplifies this structure, we study projected N-point correlators in two regimes: factorization in the back-to-back limit and leading non-perturbative effects in the collinear limit. While results in the back-to-back regime were previously limited to the energy-energy correlator, our approach allows us to derive the factorization theorem for arbitrary N. We compute the new ingredient, a one-loop jet function, needed for the next-to-next-to-leading-logarithmic resummation, which enables future $α_s$ extractions with complementary systematics. We further determine the analytic structure of leading non-perturbative power corrections for arbitrary N, including their dependence on the center-of-mass energy Q, the value of N, and the angular scale $x$. We present the first results for non-integer N<1, finding that the classical scaling in $x$ acquires an N-dependent modification, and that a new non-perturbative matrix element $\tildeΩ^{[N]}$ appears. In a certain approximation, $\tildeΩ^{[N]}$ can be related to the standard parameter $Ω_1$ relevant for N>1. Our analytic predictions are tested against the hadronization model in Pythia, finding good agreement. The results presented in this paper demonstrate the significant advancements enabled through our new parametrization of energy correlators.2026-03-17T18:00:01Z24 pages, 11 figuresAnkita BudhrajaIsabelle PelsWouter J. Waalewijnhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22643v2Measuring out-of-time-order correlators on a quantum computer based on an irreversibility-susceptibility method2026-03-17T16:23:47ZThe out-of-time-ordered correlator (OTOC) is a powerful tool for probing quantum information scrambling, a fundamental process by which local information spreads irreversibly throughout a quantum many-body system. Experimentally measuring the OTOC, however, is notoriously challenging due to the need for time-reversed evolution. Here, we present an experimental evaluation of the OTOC on a quantum computer, using three distinct protocols to address this challenge: the rewinding time method (RTM), the weak-measurement method (WMM), and the irreversibility-susceptibility method (ISM). Our experiments investigate the quantum dynamics of an XXZ spin-1/2 chain prepared in a thermal Gibbs state. As a key contribution, we provide the first experimental demonstration of the ISM, using the trapped-ion quantum computer, reimei. We also conduct a detailed comparative analysis of all three methods, revealing method-dependent behaviors in the measured OTOC. This work not only validates these protocols as practical tools for exploring quantum chaos on near-term hardware but also offers crucial insights into their respective advantages and limitations, providing a practical framework for future experimental investigations.2025-12-27T16:33:19Z12 pages and 6 figuresHaruki EmoriHiroyasu Tajimahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16740v1Prospects for precision CE$ν$NS measurements with electron-capture neutrinos and lithium-based bolometers2026-03-17T16:20:36ZWe evaluate the feasibility of high-precision coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering measurements exploiting mono-energetic neutrinos produced by electron-capture (EC) decays of intense radioactive sources, such as $^{51}$Cr or $^{37}$Ar. To fully exploit the high neutrino flux achievable with EC sources, and accounting for the low energy of EC neutrinos, we evaluate the sensitivity of a compact array of bolometric detectors with absorbers based on light elements, such as lithium, oxygen and fluorine. With 1 kg of LiF detectors, source activities of $\sim10^{17}$ Bq, and assuming an energy threshold of 20 eV, we expect to achieve a $\sim 3\%$ precision on the determination of the neutrino flux with 90 days of measurement. Such a measurement would represent a test of the gallium neutrino anomaly, and could disentangle nuclear effects on gallium from the misevaluation of the EC source activity or short-baseline neutrino oscillations.2026-03-17T16:20:36Zv1: 8 pages, 3 figuresGiovanni BenatoFrancesca M. PofiAndrei PuiuChristoph A. Terneshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16702v1Investigating Ultra-Low Energy Ionization Yield from Nuclear Recoils in Semiconductor Detectors via Molecular Dynamics Simulations2026-03-17T15:56:10ZNuclear recoil ionization yield constitutes a critical uncertainty source in low-energy detection for dark matter (DM) and coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$ν$NS) experiments. We present a novel methodology employing molecular dynamics simulations to assess ionization yields in crystalline semiconductor detectors. This non-parameterized approach resolving inherent limitations of traditional Lindhard model through explicit incorporation of crystal condensed matter effects, facilitating a seamless reliability from high-energy ($E>10$\,keV) to electron-hole pair (EHP) regimes. Our model achieves the best agreement with experimental data in silicon to date, especially at the minimal energy level of a single EHP. Meticulously consideration of ion transport mechanisms reveals fundamental ionization yield distributions, superseding conventional single-value models. The distributional paradigm extends the DM-nucleon elastic scattering exclusion limit to 0.29\,GeV/$c^2$ under single-EHP sensitivity. We further report advancements in modeling quantum effects and channeling phenomena affecting ionization yields in high-purity germanium detectors.2026-03-17T15:56:10Z5 pages, 4 figuresChang-Hao Fanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16603v1Searches for the leptophilic Z' boson at the International Linear Collider and Linear Collider Facility2026-03-17T14:46:53ZProduction of the leptophilic Z' boson at future colliders was proposed as one of the benchmark Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) scenarios for the Physics Briefing Book prepared for the 2026 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. Presented in this contributions are results on the sensitivity of the experiments at the International Linear Collider (ILC) and at the Linear Collider Facility (LCF) at CERN to the considered scenario. Studied as a function of the Z' boson mass is the expected signal in the di-muon decay channel, which is expected to have the highest sensitivity. Signal and background simulation in WHIZARD includes effects of multi-photon emission and initial state radiation (ISR), with proper matching between ISR and matrix element domains. Expected limits on the Z' couplings to SM leptons are presented for ILC and LCF running at 250 GeV and LCF running at 550 GeV.2026-03-17T14:46:53Z6 pages, 4 figures. Submitted to The European Physical Journal Plus as the contribution to "Focus Point on Future Linear Colliders for High Energy Physics" volume. This preprint has not undergone peer review or any post-submission improvements or correctionsEur. Phys. J. Plus 141, 313 (2026)Aleksander Filip Żarnecki10.1140/epjp/s13360-026-07541-8http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16594v1Finite size effects on critical correlations in momentum space2026-03-17T14:41:34ZThe search for the QCD critical end point (CEP) is a major objective of contemporary heavy-ion physics, motivating the study of fluctuation observables that are sensitive to critical dynamics. In particular, baryon-number fluctuations provide a natural probe because the net-baryon density can serve as an effective order parameter in the vicinity of the CEP. Near criticality, long-range correlations and power-law scaling are expected to emerge in the real-space two-point function of the baryon density, yet the finite size and finite lifetime of the fireball created in heavy-ion collisions impose intrinsic cutoffs that regulate the growth of the correlation length. These finite-size constraints significantly modify the observable structure of fluctuations, especially in momentum space, where experiments perform measurements. In this work we present a theoretical analysis of the momentum-space two-point correlation function for a system of finite spatial extent. We show that finite size effects lead to an effective scaling exponent which coincides with that of the infinitely extended system only in a prescribed scaling region within the experimentally accessible momentum range.2026-03-17T14:41:34Z7 pages, 4 figuresAthanasios BrofasFotios K. Diakonos