https://arxiv.org/api/QVamz77Xk094KBLCuBwzFPLy0h82026-06-13T20:58:11Z6038527015http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27273v1Study of nuclear effects on charm production in light-ion collisions2026-05-26T16:49:07ZThe onset of nuclear effects in light-ion collisions is studied by measuring the ratio of $D^0$ meson production between NeNe and OO collisions at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair of $5.36\,{\rm TeV}$ recorded by the LHCb detector. The $D^0$ meson yields are measured differentially in transverse momentum ($p_{\rm T}$) for $0.5<p_{\rm T}<20\,{\rm GeV}$ in the rapidity ($y$) region $2.0<y<4.5$, and are normalized to the total number of recorded inelastic nucleus-nucleus collisions in each data sample. The resulting production ratio shows evidence of variation as a function of $p_{\rm T}$, which is inconsistent with predictions based on nuclear modification of nucleon structure alone. This measurement is consistent with the onset of quark-gluon plasma production with increasing nucleus size in high-energy nuclear collisions.2026-05-26T16:49:07ZAll figures and tables, along with machine-readable versions and any supplementary material and additional information, are available at https://lbfence.cern.ch/alcm/public/analysis/full-details/6142/ (LHCb public pages) LHCb collaborationR. AaijM. AbdelfatahA. S. W. AbdelmottelebC. Abellan BetetaF. AbudinénT. AckernleyA. A. AdefisoyeB. AdevaM. AdinolfiP. AdlarsonC. AgapopoulouC. A. AidalaS. AkarK. AkibaP. AlbicoccoJ. AlbrechtR. AleksiejunasF. AlessioP. Alvarez CartelleS. AmatoJ. L. AmeyY. AmhisL. AnL. AnderliniM. AnderssonP. AndreolaM. AndreottiS. Andres EstradaA. AnelliD. AoC. ArataF. ArchilliZ. AregM. ArgentonS. Arguedas CuendisL. ArnoneM. ArtusoE. AslanidesR. Ataíde Da SilvaM. AtzeniB. AudurierJ. A. AuthierD. BacherI. Bachiller PereaS. BachmannM. BachmayerJ. J. BackZ. B. BaiV. BalaguraA. BalboniW. BaldiniZ. BaldwinL. BalzaniH. BaoJ. Baptista de Souza LeiteC. Barbero PretelM. BarbettiI. R. BarbosaR. J. BarlowM. BarnyakovS. BaronS. BarsukW. BarterJ. BartzS. BashirB. BatsukhP. B. BattistaA. BavarcheeA. BayA. BeckM. BeckerF. BedeschiI. B. BediagaN. A. BehlingS. BelinA. BellavistaI. BelovI. BelyaevG. BencivenniE. Ben-HaimJ. L. M. BerkeyR. BernetA. BertolinF. BettiJ. BexO. BezshyykoS. BhattacharyaM. S. BiekerN. V. BiesuzA. BiolchiniM. BirchF. C. R. BishopA. BitadzeA. BizzetiT. BlakeF. BlancJ. E. BlankS. BluskJ. A. BoelhauveO. Boente GarciaT. BoettcherA. BohareC. BolognaniR. BolzonellaR. B. BonacciA. BordeliusF. BorgatoS. BorghiM. BorsatoJ. T. BorsukE. BottalicoS. A. BouchibaM. BovillT. J. V. BowcockA. BoyerC. BozziJ. D. BrandenburgA. Brea RodriguezN. BreerC. BreitfeldJ. BrodzickaJ. BrownD. BrunduE. BuchananM. Burgos MarcosC. BurrC. ButiJ. S. ButterJ. BuytaertW. ByczynskiS. CadedduH. CaiY. CaiA. CailletR. CalabreseL. CaleficeM. CalviM. Calvo GomezP. Camargo MagalhaesJ. I. Cambon BouzasP. CampanaA. C. CamposA. F. Campoverde QuezadaY. CaoS. CapelliM. CaporaleL. CapriottiR. Caravaca-MoraA. CarboneL. Carcedo SalgadoR. CardinaleA. CardiniP. CarnitiL. CarusA. Casais VidalR. CasparyG. CasseM. CattaneoG. CavalleroV. CavalliniS. CelaniI. CelestinoS. CesareA. J. ChadwickI. ChahrourM. CharlesPh. CharpentierE. ChatzianagnostouR. CheaibM. ChefdevilleC. ChenJ. ChenS. ChenZ. ChenA. Chen HuM. CherifS. ChernyshenkoX. ChiotopoulosG. ChizhikV. ChobanovaM. ChrzaszczV. ChulikovP. CiambroneX. Cid VidalP. CifraP. E. L. ClarkeM. ClemencicH. V. CliffJ. ClosierC. Cocha ToapaxiV. CocoJ. CoganE. CognerasL. CojocariuS. CollavitiP. CollinsT. ColomboM. ColonnaA. Comerma-MontellsL. CongedoJ. ConnaughtonA. ContuN. CookeG. CordovaC. CoronelI. CorredoiraA. CorreiaG. CortiG. C. CostantinoJ. Cottee MeldrumB. CouturierD. C. CraikN. CrepetM. Cruz TorresM. Cubero CamposE. Curras RiveraR. CurrieC. L. Da SilvaX. DaiJ. DalsenoC. D'AmbrosioG. DarzeA. DavidsonJ. E. DaviesO. De Aguiar FranciscoC. De AngelisF. De BenedettiJ. de BoerK. De BruynS. De CapuaM. De CianU. De Freitas Carneiro Da GracaE. De LuciaJ. M. De MirandaL. De PaulaM. De SerioP. De SimoneF. De VellisJ. A. de VriesF. DebernardisD. DecampS. DekkersL. Del BuonoB. DelaneyJ. DengV. DenysenkoO. DeschampsF. DettoriB. DeyP. Di NezzaS. DingY. DingL. DittmannA. D. DochevaA. DohenyC. DongF. DordeiA. C. dos ReisA. D. DowlingL. DreyfusW. DuanP. DudaL. DufourV. DukP. DuranteM. M. DurasJ. M. DurhamO. D. DurmusK. DuweA. DziurdaS. EasoE. EcksteinU. EgedeS. EisenhardtE. EjopuL. EklundM. ElashriD. Elizondo BlancoJ. EllbrachtS. ElyA. EneJ. EschleT. EvansF. FabianoS. FaghihL. N. FalcaoB. FangR. FantechiL. FantiniM. FariaK. FarmerF. FassinD. FazziniL. FelkowskiC. FengM. FengA. Fernandez CasaniM. Fernandez GomezA. D. FernezF. FerrariF. Ferreira RodriguesM. FerrilloM. Ferro-LuzziR. A. FiniM. FioriniM. FirlejK. L. FischerD. S. FitzgeraldC. FitzpatrickT. FiutowskiF. FleuretA. FominM. FontanaL. A. ForemanR. FortyD. Foulds-HoltV. Franco LimaM. Franco SevillaM. FrankE. FranzosoG. FrauC. FreiD. A. FridayJ. FuQ. FühringT. FulghesuG. GalatiM. D. GalatiA. Gallas TorreiraD. GalliS. GambettaM. GandelmanP. GandiniB. GanieH. GaoR. GaoT. Q. GaoY. GaoY. GaoY. GaoL. M. Garcia MartinP. Garcia MorenoJ. García PardiñasP. GardnerL. GarridoC. GasparA. GavrikovE. GersabeckM. GersabeckT. GershonS. GhizzoZ. GhorbanimoghaddamF. I. GiasemisV. GibsonH. K. GiemzaA. L. GilmanM. GiovannettiA. GioventùL. GirardeyM. A. GizaF. C. GlaserV. V. GligorovC. GöbelL. Golinka-BezshyykoE. GolobardesA. GolutvinS. Gomez FernandezW. GomulkaF. Goncalves AbrantesI. Gonçales VazM. GoncerzG. GongJ. A. GoodingC. GottiE. GovorkovaJ. P. GrabowskiL. A. Granado CardosoE. GraugésE. GraveriniL. GrazetteG. GrazianiA. T. GrecuN. A. GrieserL. GrilloC. GuM. GuariseL. GuerryA. -K. GuseinovY. GuzT. GysK. HabermannT. HadavizadehC. HadjivasiliouG. HaefeliC. HaenS. HakenG. HallettP. M. HamiltonQ. HanX. HanS. Hansmann-MenzemerN. HarnewT. J. HarrisM. HartmannS. HashmiJ. HeN. HeatleyA. HedesF. HemmerC. HendersonR. HendersonR. D. L. HendersonA. M. HennequinK. HennessyJ. HerdP. Herrero GasconJ. HeuelA. HeynA. HicheurG. Hijano MendizabalJ. HorswillR. HouY. HouD. C. HoustonN. HowarthW. HuX. HuW. HulsbergenR. J. HunterD. HutchcroftM. IdzikP. IltenA. IohnerH. JageS. J. Jaimes EllesS. JakobsenT. JakoubekE. JansA. JawaheryC. JayaweeraA. JelavicV. JevticZ. JiaE. JiangX. JiangY. JiangY. J. JiangE. Jimenez MoyaN. JindalM. JohnA. John Rubesh RajanD. JohnsonC. R. JonesS. JoshiB. JostJ. Juan CastellaN. JurikI. JuszczakK. KalecinskaD. KaminarisS. KandybeiM. KaneY. KangC. KarM. KaracsonA. KauniskangasJ. W. KautzM. K. KazaneckiF. KeizerM. KenzieT. KetelB. KhanjiS. KholodenkoG. KhreichF. KirazT. KirnV. S. KirsebomN. KleijneA. KleimenovaD. K. KlekotsK. KlimaszewskiM. R. KmiecT. KnospeR. KolbS. KoliievL. KolkA. KonoplyannikovP. KopciewiczP. KoppenburgA. KorchinI. KostiukO. KotS. KotriakhovaE. KowalczykO. KravcovM. KrepsW. KrupaW. KrzemienO. KshyvanskyiS. KubisM. KucharczykA. KupscV. KushnirB. KutsenkoJ. KvapilI. KyryllinD. LacarrereP. Laguarta GonzalezA. LaiA. LampisD. LancieriniC. Landesa GomezJ. J. LaneG. LanfranchiC. LangenbruchT. LathamF. LazzariC. LazzeroniR. Le GacH. LeeR. LefèvreM. LehurauxE. Lemos CidO. LeroyT. LesiakE. D. LesserB. LeveringtonA. LiC. LiC. LiH. LiJ. LiK. LiL. LiP. LiP. -R. LiQ. LiT. LiT. LiY. LiY. LiY. LiZ. LianQ. LiangX. LiangZ. LiangS. LibralonA. LightbodyJ. LinT. LinR. LindnerH. LintonR. LitvinovD. LiuF. L. LiuG. LiuK. LiuS. LiuW. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. L. LiuG. Loachamin OrdonezI. LoboA. Lobo SalviaA. LoiT. LongF. C. L. LopesJ. H. LopesA. Lopez HuertasC. Lopez IribarnegarayQ. LuC. LucarelliD. LucchesiM. Lucio MartinezY. LuoA. LupatoM. LupbergerE. LuppiK. LynchS. LyuX. -R. LyuH. MaS. MaccoliniF. MachefertF. MaciucB. MackI. MackayL. M. MackeyL. R. Madhan MohanM. J. MaduraiD. MagdalinskiJ. J. MalczewskiS. MaldeL. MalentaccaG. MancaG. MancinelliC. MancusoR. Manera EscaleroA. MangalasseriF. M. ManganellaD. ManuzziS. MaoD. MarangottoJ. F. MarchandR. MarchevskiU. MarconiE. MarianiS. MarianiC. Marin BenitoJ. MarksA. M. MarshallL. MartelG. MartelliG. MartellottiL. MartinazzoliM. MartinelliC. MartinezD. Martinez GomezD. Martinez SantosF. Martinez VidalA. Martorell i GranollersA. MassafferriR. MatevA. MathadC. MatteuzziK. R. MattioliA. MauriE. MauriceJ. MauricioP. MayencourtJ. Mazorra de CosM. MazurekD. Mazzanti TaranconM. McCannN. T. McHughA. McNabR. McNultyB. MeadowsS. E. R. MedaerD. MelnychukD. Mendoza GranadaP. Menendez Valdes PerezF. M. MengM. MerkA. MerliL. Meyer GarciaD. MiaoH. MiaoM. MikhasenkoD. A. MilanesA. MinottiE. MinucciB. MitreskaD. S. MitzelR. MocanuA. ModakL. MoeserR. D. MoiseE. F. Molina CardenasT. MombächerM. MonkT. MonnardS. MonteilA. Morcillo GomezG. MorelloM. J. MorelloM. P. MorgenthalerA. MoroJ. MoronW. MorrenA. B. MorrisA. G. MorrisR. MountainZ. MuN. MuangkodE. MuhammadF. MuheimM. MulderK. MüllerF. Muñoz-RojasV. MytrochenkoP. NaikT. NakadaR. NandakumarG. NapoletanoI. NastevaM. NeedhamN. NeriS. NeubertN. NeufeldJ. NicoliniD. NicotraE. M. NielL. NisiQ. NiuB. K. NjokiP. NogarolliP. NoggaC. NormandJ. Novoa FernandezG. NowakH. N. NurA. Oblakowska-MuchaT. OeserO. OkhrimenkoR. OldemanF. OlivaE. Olivart PinoM. OloccoR. H. O'NeilJ. S. Ordonez SotoD. OsthuesJ. M. Otalora GoicocheaP. OwenA. OyangurenO. OzcelikF. PaciollaA. PadeeK. O. PadekenB. PagareT. PajeroA. PalanoL. PaliniM. PalutanC. PanX. PanS. PanebiancoS. PaniskakiL. PaolucciA. PapanestisM. PappagalloL. L. PappalardoC. PappenheimerC. ParkesD. ParmarG. PassalevaD. PassaroA. PastoreM. PatelJ. PatocC. PatrignaniA. PaulC. J. PawleyA. PellegrinoJ. PengX. PengM. Pepe AltarelliS. PerazziniH. Pereira Da CostaM. Pereira MartinezA. Pereiro CastroC. PerezP. PerretA. PerrevoortA. PerroM. J. PetersK. PetridisA. PetroliniS. PezzuloJ. P. PfallerH. PhamL. PicaM. PicciniL. PiccoloB. PietrzykR. N. PilatoD. PinciF. PisaniM. PizzichemiV. M. PlacintaM. Plo CasasusT. PoeschlF. PolciM. Poli LenerA. PoluektovI. PolyakovE. PolycarpoS. PonceD. PopovK. PoppK. PrasanthC. ProuveD. ProvenzanoV. PugatchA. Puicercus GomezG. PunziJ. R. PybusQ. QianW. QianN. QinR. QuaglianiR. I. Rabadan TrejoB. RachwalR. RaczJ. H. RademackerM. RamaM. Ramírez GarcíaV. Ramos De OliveiraM. Ramos PernasM. S. RangelG. RavenM. Rebollo De MiguelF. RediJ. ReichF. ReissZ. RenP. K. ResmiM. Ribalda GalvezR. RibattiG. RicartD. RiccardiS. RicciardiK. RichardsonM. Richardson-SlipperF. RiehnK. RinnertP. RobbeG. RobertsonE. RodriguesA. Rodriguez AlvarezE. Rodriguez FernandezJ. A. Rodriguez LopezE. Rodriguez RodriguezJ. RoenschA. RogovskiyD. L. RolfP. RoloffV. RomanovskiyA. Romero VidalG. RomoliniF. RonchettiT. RongM. RotondoM. S. RudolphM. Ruiz DiazJ. Ruiz VidalJ. J. Saavedra-AriasJ. J. Saborido SilvaD. SahooN. SahooB. SaittaM. SalomoniI. SanderswoodR. SantacesariaC. Santamarina RiosM. SantimariaL. SantoroE. SantovettiA. SaputiA. SarnatskiyG. SarpisM. SarpisC. SatrianoA. SattaM. SaurH. SazakF. SborzacchiA. ScarabottoS. SchaelS. ScherlM. SchillerH. SchindlerM. SchmellingB. SchmidtN. SchmidtS. SchmittH. SchmitzO. SchneiderA. SchopperN. SchulteM. H. SchuneG. SchweringB. SciasciaA. SciuccatiG. ScrivenI. SegalS. SellamM. Senghi SoaresA. SergiN. SerraL. SestiniB. Sevilla SanjuanY. ShangD. M. ShangaseR. S. SharmaL. ShchutskaT. ShearsJ. ShenZ. ShenS. ShengB. ShiJ. ShiQ. ShiW. S. ShiE. ShmaninR. Silva CoutinhoG. SimiS. SimoneM. SinghaI. SiralN. SkidmoreT. SkwarnickiM. W. SlaterE. SmithM. SmithL. Soares LavraM. D. SokoloffF. J. P. SolerA. SolominK. SolovievaN. S. SommerfeldR. SongY. SongY. SongY. S. SongF. L. Souza De AlmeidaB. Souza De PaulaK. M. SowaE. Spadaro NorellaE. SpedicatoJ. G. SpeerP. SpradlinF. StagniM. StahlS. StahlS. StanislausM. StefaniakO. SteinkampF. SuljikJ. SunL. SunM. SunD. SundfeldW. SutcliffeP. SvihraV. SvintozelskyiK. SwientekF. SwystunA. SzabelskiT. SzumlakY. TanY. TangY. T. TangM. D. TatJ. A. Teijeiro JimenezF. TerzuoliF. TeubertE. ThomasD. J. D. ThompsonA. R. Thomson-StrongH. TilquinV. TisserandS. T'JampensM. TobinT. T. TodorovL. TomassettiG. TonaniX. TongT. TorkL. ToscanoD. Y. TouC. TripplG. TuciN. TuningL. H. UeckerA. UklejaA. UpadhyayB. UrbachA. UsachovU. UwerV. VagnoniA. VaitkeviciusV. Valcarce CadenasG. ValentiN. Valls CanudasJ. van EldikH. Van HeckeE. van HerwijnenC. B. Van HulseR. Van LaakM. van VeghelG. VasquezR. Vazquez GomezP. Vazquez RegueiroC. Vázquez SierraS. VecchiJ. Velilla SernaJ. J. VelthuisM. VeltriA. VenkateswaranM. VerdogliaM. VesterinenW. VetensD. Vico BenetP. Vidrier VillalbaM. Vieites DiazX. Vilasis-CardonaE. Vilella FiguerasA. VillaP. VincentB. VivacquaF. C. VolleD. vom BruchK. VosC. VrahasJ. WagnerJ. WalshN. WalterE. J. WaltonG. WanA. WangB. WangC. WangG. WangH. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangM. WangN. W. WangR. WangX. WangX. WangX. WangX. W. WangY. WangY. WangY. H. WangZ. WangZ. WangJ. A. WardM. WaterlaatN. K. WatsonD. WebsdaleY. WeiZ. WeidaJ. WendelB. D. C. WesthenryC. WhiteM. WhiteheadE. WhiterA. R. WiederholdD. WiednerM. A. WiegertjesC. WildG. WilkinsonM. K. WilkinsonM. WilliamsM. J. WilliamsM. R. J. WilliamsR. WilliamsS. WilliamsZ. WilliamsF. F. WilsonM. WinnW. WislickiM. WitekL. WitolaT. WolfE. WoodG. WormserS. A. WottonH. WuJ. WuX. WuY. WuZ. WuK. WyllieS. XianZ. XiangY. XieT. X. XingA. XuL. XuM. XuR. XuZ. XuZ. XuZ. XuZ. XuS. YadavK. YangX. YangY. YangY. YangZ. YangZ. YangH. YeungH. YinX. YinC. Y. YuJ. YuX. YuanY YuanJ. A. Zamora SaaM. ZavertyaevM. ZdybalF. ZenesiniC. ZengM. ZengS. H ZengC. ZhangD. ZhangJ. ZhangL. ZhangR. ZhangS. ZhangS. L. ZhangY. ZhangZ. ZhangJ. ZhaoY. ZhaoA. ZhelezovS. Z. ZhengX. Z. ZhengY. ZhengT. ZhouX. ZhouV. ZhovkovskaL. Z. ZhuX. ZhuX. ZhuY. ZhuV. ZhukovJ. ZhuoD. ZulianiG. Zunicahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23401v2Development of a system for testing full-size CMS LGAD sensors2026-05-26T15:46:14ZLow-Gain Avalanche Diode (LGAD) sensors, offering timing resolutions of the order of tens of picoseconds, are being widely adopted in particle physics experiments and related applications. As these applications scale to large numbers of sensors with varying pixel geometries, conventional manual characterization techniques become inadequate for large-scale quality control. We present a modular probe card system for automated electrical characterization of pixelated LGAD sensors, consisting of a probe card, a switching board, precision measurement instruments, and control software. The system supports flexible pixel selection and measurement. Its performance is demonstrated through current-voltage (I-V) and capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements of a $16 \times 16$ LGAD array. A rapid row-wise I-V scan of the full array is completed in approximately 20 minutes, while a pixel-by-pixel I-V scan from 0 to 300 V with a 1 V step requires about 340 minutes. The switching matrix introduces less than 1 nA of leakage current even in a conservative worst-case configuration, remaining small compared with the leakage current of a normal LGAD pixel. The modular architecture and automation capability make the system a practical and scalable solution for large-scale LGAD sensor quality control and distributed testing environments.2026-05-22T09:12:47Z18 pages, 11 figuresKyungmin LeeHoyong JeongJunho KimSeokhyeon LeeJaebak KimJae Hyeok Yoohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26821v1Particle-Lund Multimodality in Jet Taggers2026-05-26T10:39:34ZThe Lund plane offers a physics-motivated, hierarchical representation of QCD radiation within jets, while transformer-based taggers have reached state-of-the-art performance by learning directly from raw particle constituents and their pairwise relations. We investigate whether transformers implicitly capture hierarchical QCD structure from constituent-level inputs, or whether explicit physics representations remain complementary. To test this, we introduce PLuM, a multimodal architecture that projects particle constituents and Lund plane splittings into a shared latent space, processing both jointly with a unified transformer. Cross-attention allows the model to probe whether structured QCD information provides discriminating power beyond what particles alone encode. We observe systematic gains for top-quark and $\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{b}\bar{\mathrm{b}}$ tagging, while finding no comparable improvement for $\mathrm{H}\to\mathrm{c}\bar{\mathrm{c}}$ or $\mathrm{H}\to 4\mathrm{q}$ topologies. This selective enhancement suggests that explicit hierarchical information about b-jet formation remains complementary to raw particle representations even in highly expressive architectures, while other topologies are already well-captured at constituent level. For high-impact LHC analyses such as Lorentz-boosted di-Higgs searches in the four $\mathrm{b}$ quark final state ($\mathrm{H}\mathrm{H}(4\mathrm{b})$), the gains are substantial: at a $25\%$ di-Higgs efficiency working point, PLuM achieves $25\%$ higher background rejection than the baseline. Our results indicate that physically structured representations of QCD radiation retain discriminating value in the transformer era, motivating further study into how different aspects of jet dynamics are encoded by deep learning algorithms.2026-05-26T10:39:34ZLoukas GouskosBenedikt Maierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26766v1Sensitivity of Heavy-Quark Dipolar Flow to its Initial Spatial Distributions in Cu+Au Collisions2026-05-26T09:37:55ZWe investigate charm-quark dynamics in asymmetric Cu+Au collisions at top RHIC energy using a Langevin approach embedded in a realistic hydrodynamic background. The intrinsic asymmetry of the colliding nuclei leads to a spatially lopsided initial energy-density profile, which generates a dipolar flow structure in the transverse plane even at midrapidity. As charm quarks propagate through this medium, they acquire a finite directed flow, $v_1$. We find that the $p_T$-integrated heavy-quark $v_1$ is approximately an order of magnitude larger than that of charged hadrons. In addition, the $p_T$-differential $v_1$ exhibits strong sensitivity to the initial spatial distribution of heavy quarks, emphasizing the importance of pre-equilibrium dynamics in determining final-state anisotropies. Beyond geometric effects, $v_1$ also provides direct sensitivity to medium interactions through the temperature-dependent drag coefficient. Its pronounced dependence on this transport input indicates that precision measurements of heavy-flavor directed flow could place meaningful constraints on heavy-quark transport coefficients, thereby improving Langevin-based descriptions and predictive power for heavy-flavor observables in heavy-ion collisions.2026-05-26T09:37:55Z7 pages, 5 figuresAnkit Kumar PandaTribhuban Paridahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26737v1Cumulants of mean transverse momentum and elliptic flow in the hydrodynamic model of heavy-ion collisions2026-05-26T09:12:07ZHigher order cumulants between the mean transverse momentum and elliptic flow are calculated in a relativistic viscous hydrodynamic model of relativistic heavy-ion collisions. The results of the hydrodynamic simulations are compared with calculations using event-by-event predictors of the final collective observables constructed from the initial state entropy distribution. The predictors describes quantitatively centrality dependence of the higher cumulants considered in the paper. We derive a quantitative relations between the cumulants of the mean transverse momentum and different moments of the harmonic flow. The hydrodynamic simulations satisfy those relation very well. Those relations could be used to test experimentally the collective origin of the observed correlations between the mean transverse momentum and harmonic flow.2026-05-26T09:12:07Z3 figuresTribhuban ParidaPiotr Bożekhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04200v2$e^+e^- \rightarrow s\bar{s}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 250$ GeV at future linear colliders2026-05-26T09:09:33ZThe forward-backward asymmetry ($A_{FB}$) in light-quark production is a sensitive probe of the electroweak sector and potential flavour-dependent BSM effects. We present a study of $e^+e^- \rightarrow s\bar{s}$ at $\sqrt{s}=250$ GeV at future linear colliders, using full ILD simulation and reconstruction tools for ILC and LCF@CERN. We assess the impact of particle identification on charge reconstruction and $A_{FB}$ extraction, considering software improvements using Comprehensive PID (CPID) for optimal $dE/dx$ usage, as well as hardware scenarios including cluster counting ($dN/dx$) and ideal TPC performance. Statistical precision gains are evaluated, with corrections for charge misidentification and acceptance applied. Results indicate that precise $A_{FB}^{s\bar{s}}$ measurements are feasible and that advanced PID is key to maximising sensitivity to electroweak and new-physics effects.2026-03-04T15:46:44ZProceeding for LCWS2025J. P. MárquezR. PöeschlA. IrlesF. Richardhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14635v2$B$-meson decay width up to $1/m_b^3$ corrections within and beyond the Standard Model2026-05-26T09:02:55ZStarting from the most general effective $|ΔB| = 1$ Hamiltonian describing non-leptonic $b$-quark decays $b\to q_1 \bar q_2 q_3$, we compute analytic expressions for all matching coefficients of the two-quark operator contributions in the heavy quark expansion~(HQE) of a $B$ meson, up to mass-dimension-six. In addition, we calculate the weak-annihilation contributions, which enter the matching of four-quark operators in the HQE at dimension-six and were previously missing. Our results complete the calculation of beyond Standard Model (BSM) effects in non-leptonic, tree-level, $b$-quark decays relevant for $B$ meson lifetimes and lifetime ratios such as $τ(B^0_s)/τ(B^0_d)$. Such BSM contributions naturally arise in generic extensions of the Standard Model (SM) that aim to address the observed tensions between experimental measurements and theoretical predictions based on QCD factorisation in several colour-allowed non-leptonic $B$-meson decays. As a by-product of our calculation, we also determine the matching coefficients in the HQE induced by the QCD-penguin operators within the SM, including both the interference between current-current and penguin operators and the contributions quadratic in the penguin operators. Owing to the suppression of the QCD-penguin Wilson coefficients within the SM, these effects are typically regarded as corrections of order $α_s$ and $α_s^2$ in the strong coupling, respectively. Our results reproduce the known expressions at dimension-three and provide new results for the coefficients of the chromomagnetic operator at dimension-five and of the Darwin operator at dimension-six.2025-12-16T17:49:26Z36 pages, 3 figures. Minor changes in v2 to match the published version in JHEPJ. High Energ. Phys. 2026, 100 (2026)Martin LangAlexander LenzAli MohamedMaria Laura PiscopoAleksey V. Rusov10.1007/JHEP05(2026)100http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15121v2Shedding Light on Dark Matter at the LHC with Machine Learning2026-05-26T08:30:05ZWe investigate a WIMP dark matter (DM) candidate in the form of a singlino-dominated lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) within the $Z_3$-symmetric Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM). This framework gives rise to regions of parameter space where DM is obtained via co-annihilation with nearby higgsino-like electroweakinos and DM direct detection~signals are suppressed, the so-called ``blind spots''. On the other hand, collider signatures remain promising due to enhanced radiative decay modes of higgsinos into the singlino-dominated LSP and photons, rather than into leptons or hadrons. Compared to MSSM scenarios with light bino- and wino-like electroweakinos, the NMSSM allows for final states with multiple photons arising from cascade radiative decays, providing a distinctive collider signature. This motivates searches for radiatively decaying neutralinos, however, these signals face substantial background challenges, as the decay products are typically soft due to the small mass-splits ($Δm$) between the LSP and the higgsino-like coannihilation partners. We apply a data-driven Machine Learning (ML) analysis that improves sensitivity to these subtle signals, offering a powerful complement to traditional search strategies to discover a new physics scenario. Using an LHC integrated luminosity of $100~\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ at $14~\mathrm{TeV}$, the method achieves a $5σ$ discovery reach for higgsino masses up to $225~\mathrm{GeV}$ with $Δm\!\lesssim\!12~\mathrm{GeV}$, and a $2σ$ exclusion up to $285~\mathrm{GeV}$ with $Δm\!\lesssim\!20~\mathrm{GeV}$. These results highlight~the power of collider searches to probe DM candidates that remain hidden from current~direct detection experiments, and provide a motivation for a search by the LHC collaborations using ML methods.2025-09-18T16:27:19Z26 pages + references, 6 figures, 8 tables, 1 appendix (version published in PRD)Phys. Rev. D 113 (2026) 9, 095013Ernesto ArgandaMartín de los RiosAndres D. PerezSubhojit RoyRosa M. Sandá SeoaneCarlos E. M. Wagner10.1103/m1cd-1sfbhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27468v1Influence of the QCD Analogue of the Inverse Compton Effect on the Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distributions of Secondary Particles in pp Collisions at sqrt (s)= 30 GeV, 510 GeV, and 14 TeV2026-05-26T08:21:32ZWithin the framework of numerical simulations, this work investigates the influence of the QCD analogue of the inverse Compton effect (ICE) in the quark--gluon scattering process qg \rightarrow qg on the transverse momentum p_T and pseudorapidity eta distributions of secondary particles produced in proton--proton collisions at energies sqrt{s}=30 GeV, 510 GeV, 14 TeV. In the present context, ICE refers to a class of parton-level kinematic configurations in which the incoming quark carries a larger fraction of energy than the gluon, in contrast to the complementary DCE regime. The simulations were performed using the PYTHIA~8.316 event generator. It is shown that the relative contributions of ICE and DCE strongly depend on the collision energy. As the energy increases from sqrt{s}=30 GeV to sqrt{s}=14 TeV, the ICE contribution becomes comparable to or exceeds the DCE contribution over a broad p_T range. The analysis of pseudorapidity distributions demonstrates that deviations of the ICE/DCE ratio from unity appear predominantly in the central region |eta| simeq 0, corresponding to symmetric partonic configurations x_1 sim x_2, whereas in peripheral regions the ratio approaches unity. The obtained results indicate that, with increasing collision energy, the contribution of ICE-like processes grows due to the enhanced role of gluon collisions in the small-x region.2026-05-26T08:21:32Z6 pages, 6 figuresM. AlizadaM. Suleymanovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09027v2Testing lepton non-unitarity with the next generation of Germanium-based CE$ν$NS reactor experiments2026-05-26T08:04:52ZCoherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$ν$NS) has been experimentally confirmed using neutrinos from pion decay at rest, solar neutrinos and reactor antineutrinos. Future CE$ν$NS experiments will foreseeable lead to precision measurements which will be a powerful tool to search for new physics beyond the Standard Model. In this work, we investigate possible deviations from unitarity in the $3\times3$ leptonic mixing matrix that controls the propagation of active neutrinos. Such deviations may originate from the mixing with additional gauge singlet fermions and depending on their mass scale and mixing, the resulting phenomenology can differ substantially. We explore two well-motivated regimes: the \textit{seesaw limit}, where the new fermions are heavy and kinematically inaccessible, leading to effective deviations from unitarity in the active sector; and the \textit{light sterile limit}, where they are light enough to be produced and participate in neutrino propagation and scattering processes. We show how these scenarios modify both CE$ν$NS and elastic neutrino--electron scattering (E$νe$S), and we present the corresponding sensitivity projections for a future CE$ν$NS reactor experiment obtained by upscaling the CONUS+ experiment, which reported the first observation of reactor CE$ν$NS. We identify the leading experimental systematics relevant for such an upscaling and demonstrate the resulting capability to probe TeV-scale new physics. Our results highlight the strong potential of CE$ν$NS to test the structure of the lepton sector and to search for physics beyond the Standard Model.2025-12-09T19:00:02Z27 pages, 14 figures, 4 tables, 3 appendices; minor title change, for clarity figures 1&2 adjusted and table 1 added, references and experimental discussions added, results unchanged; matches published versionPhys.Rev.D 113 (2026) 9, 096010Salvador Centelles ChuliáManfred LindnerThomas Rink10.1103/r2n6-5dlphttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25900v2Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon from the instanton vacuum2026-05-26T04:24:50ZWe investigate the electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon within an effective chiral theory derived from the QCD instanton vacuum, taking into account the finite current quark mass. The momentum-dependent dynamical quark mass, generated by the instanton-antiinstanton medium, naturally plays the role of a regulator, so that no additional regularization is required to tame the divergences arising from quark loops. The instanton parameters, the average instanton size $\barρ=0.35$ fm and the average interdistance $\bar{R}=0.86$ fm, together with the dynamical quark mass at zero virtuality $M_0=385$ MeV, are all fixed by the saddle-point equation beyond the chiral limit, leaving no adjustable free parameter in the present calculation. We compute the Sachs electric and magnetic form factors of the proton and neutron, the nucleon charge and magnetization radii, the magnetic moments, and the ratios $μ_{p,n} G_E^{p,n}(Q^2)/G_M^{p,n}(Q^2)$. The present results are compared with the experimental data, the chiral quark-soliton model ($χ$QSM), and the Kelly parametrization. The proton charge radius, $\sqrt{\langle r^2 \rangle_\mathrm{ch}^p}=0.841$ fm, is in remarkable agreement with the recent muonic-hydrogen value, and the $Q^2$ dependence of the proton form-factor ratio $μ_p G_E^p/G_M^p$ is reproduced very well, in clear contrast to the $χ$QSM. The overall agreement with the experimental data confirms that the effective chiral theory derived from the QCD instanton vacuum provides a consistent and predictive framework for describing the electromagnetic structure of the nucleon.2026-05-25T14:26:49Z18 pages,8 figures. A typographical error was removedHui-Jae LeeYongwoo ChoiHyun-Chul Kimhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26495v1Observation of the $X(2370)$ in $J/ψ\rightarrowγK^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}π^{0}$ and $J/ψ\rightarrowγπ^{0}π^{0}η$2026-05-26T03:16:54ZBased on $(10087\pm44)\times10^{6}$ $J/ψ$ events collected with the BESIII detector, the $J/ψ\rightarrowγK^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}π^{0}$ and $J/ψ\rightarrowγπ^{0}π^{0}η$ processes are studied. The $X(2370)$ is observed in both the $K^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}π^{0}$ and $π^{0}π^{0}η$ invariant mass spectra, with statistical significances greater than $14σ$ and $20σ$, respectively. Combining measurements from these processes with measurements from the previously reported $J/ψ\rightarrowγK^{0}_{S}K^{0}_{S}η^{\prime}$ process, the mass and width of the $X(2370)$ are determined to be $2359^{+13}_{-14}~\text{MeV}/c^{2}$ and $170^{+44}_{-29}~\text{MeV}$, respectively. In addition, the decay $X(2370)\to a_{0}(980)^{0}π^{0}$ with $a_{0}(980)^{0}\to π^{0}η$ is observed with a statistical significance exceeding $9σ$. The similarities in decay modes between the $X(2370)$ and $η_{c}$ are consistent with the features of a pseudoscalar glueball.2026-05-26T03:16:54Z BESIII CollaborationM. AblikimM. N. AchasovP. AdlarsonX. C. AiC. S. AkondiR. AlibertiA. AmorosoQ. AnY. H. AnM. S. AndersonY. BaiO. BakinaH. R. BaoX. L. BaoM. BarbagiovanniV. BatozskayaK. BegzsurenN. BergerM. BerlowskiM. B. BertaniD. BettoniF. BianchiE. BiancoA. BortoneI. BoykoR. A. BriereA. BrueggemannD. CabiatiH. CaiM. H. CaiX. CaiA. CalcaterraG. F. CaoN. CaoS. A. CetinX. Y. ChaiJ. F. ChangT. T. ChangG. R. CheY. Z. CheC. H. ChenChao ChenG. ChenH. S. ChenH. Y. ChenM. L. ChenS. J. ChenS. M. ChenT. ChenW. ChenX. R. ChenX. T. ChenX. Y. ChenY. B. ChenY. Q. ChenZ. K. ChenJ. ChengL. N. ChengS. K. ChoiX. ChuG. CibinettoF. CossioJ. Cottee-MeldrumH. L. DaiJ. P. DaiX. C. DaiA. DbeyssiR. E. de BoerD. DedovichC. Q. DengZ. Y. DengA. DenigI. DenisenkoM. DestefanisF. De MoriE. Di FioreX. X. DingY. DingY. X. DingJ. DongL. Y. DongM. Y. DongX. DongZ. J. DongM. C. DuS. X. DuShaoxu DuX. L. DuY. Q. DuY. Y. DuanZ. H. DuanP. EgorovG. F. FanJ. J. FanY. H. FanJ. FangJin FangS. S. FangW. X. FangY. Q. FangL. FavaF. FeldbauerG. FeliciC. Q. FengJ. H. FengQ. X. FengY. T. FengM. FritschC. D. FuJ. L. FuY. W. FuH. GaoXu GaoY. GaoY. N. GaoY. Y. GaoYunong GaoZ. GaoS. GarbolinoI. GarziaL. GeP. T. GeZ. W. GeC. GengA. GilmanK. GoetzenJ. GollubJ. B. GongJ. D. GongL. GongW. X. GongW. GradlM. GrecoM. D. GuM. H. GuC. Y. GuanA. Q. GuoH. GuoJ. N. GuoL. B. GuoM. J. GuoR. P. GuoX. GuoY. P. GuoZ. GuoA. GuskovJ. GutierrezJ. Y. HanT. T. HanX. HanF. HanischK. D. HaoX. Q. HaoF. A. HarrisC. Z. HeK. K. HeK. L. HeF. H. HeinsiusC. H. HeinzY. K. HengC. HeroldP. C. HongG. Y. HouX. T. HouY. R. HouZ. L. HouH. M. HuJ. F. HuQ. P. HuS. L. HuT. HuY. HuY. X. HuZ. M. HuG. S. HuangK. X. HuangL. Q. HuangP. HuangX. T. HuangY. P. HuangY. S. HuangT. HussainN. HüskenN. in der WiescheJ. JacksonQ. JiQ. P. JiW. JiX. B. JiX. L. JiY. Y. JiL. K. JiaX. Q. JiaD. JiangS. J. JiangX. S. JiangY. JiangJ. B. JiaoJ. K. JiaoZ. JiaoL. C. L. JinS. JinY. JinM. Q. JingX. M. JingT. JohanssonS. KabanaX. L. KangX. S. KangB. C. KeV. KhachatryanA. KhoukazO. B. KolcuB. KopfL. KrögerL. KrümmelY. Y. KuangX. KuiN. KumarA. KupscW. KühnQ. LanW. N. LanT. T. LeiM. LellmannT. LenzC. LiC. H. LiC. K. LiChunkai LiCong LiD. M. LiF. LiG. LiH. B. LiH. J. LiH. L. LiH. N. LiH. P. LiHui LiJ. N. LiJ. S. LiJ. W. LiK. LiK. L. LiL. J. LiL. K. LiLei LiM. H. LiM. R. LiM. T. LiP. L. LiP. R. LiQ. M. LiQ. X. LiR. LiS. LiS. X. LiS. Y. LiShanshan LiT. LiT. Y. LiW. D. LiW. G. LiX. LiX. H. LiX. K. LiX. L. LiX. Y. LiX. Z. LiY. LiY. H. LiY. B. LiY. C. LiY. G. LiY. P. LiZ. H. LiZ. J. LiZ. L. LiZ. X. LiZ. Y. LiC. LiangH. LiangY. F. LiangY. T. LiangZ. Z. LiangG. R. LiaoL. B. LiaoM. H. LiaoY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyA. LimphiratC. C. LinC. X. LinD. X. LinT. LinB. J. LiuB. X. LiuC. LiuC. X. LiuF. LiuF. H. LiuFeng LiuG. M. LiuH. LiuH. B. LiuH. M. LiuHuihui LiuJ. B. LiuJ. J. LiuK. LiuK. Y. LiuKe LiuKun LiuL. LiuL. C. LiuLu LiuM. H. LiuP. L. LiuQ. LiuS. B. LiuT. LiuW. M. LiuW. T. LiuX. LiuX. K. LiuX. L. LiuX. P. LiuX. T. LiuX. Y. LiuY. LiuY. B. LiuYi LiuZ. A. LiuZ. D. LiuZ. L. LiuZ. Q. LiuZ. X. LiuZ. Y. LiuX. C. LouH. J. LuJ. G. LuX. L. LuY. LuY. H. LuY. P. LuZ. H. LuC. L. LuoJ. R. LuoJ. S. LuoM. X. LuoT. LuoX. L. LuoZ. Y. LvX. R. LyuY. F. LyuY. H. LyuF. C. MaH. L. MaHeng MaJ. L. MaL. L. MaL. R. MaQ. M. MaR. Q. MaR. Y. MaT. MaX. T. MaX. Y. MaF. E. MaasI. MacKayM. MaggioraS. MaityS. MaldeL. M. MansurY. J. MaoZ. P. MaoS. MarcelloA. MarshallF. M. MelendiY. H. MengZ. X. MengG. MezzadriH. MiaoT. J. MinR. E. MitchellX. H. MoB. MosesN. Yu. MuchnoiJ. MuskallaY. NefedovF. NerlingH. NeuwirthZ. NingS. NisarQ. L. NiuW. D. NiuY. NiuC. NormandS. L. OlsenQ. OuyangI. V. OvtinS. PacettiY. PanC. Y. PangA. PathakY. P. PeiM. PelizaeusG. L. PengH. P. PengX. J. PengY. Y. PengK. PetersK. PetridisJ. L. PingR. G. PingS. PluraV. PrasadL. PöppingF. Z. QiH. R. QiS. QianW. B. QianC. F. QiaoJ. H. QiaoJ. J. QinJ. L. QinL. Q. QinL. Y. QinP. B. QinX. P. QinX. S. QinZ. H. QinJ. F. QiuZ. H. QuJ. RademackerK. RavindranC. F. RedmerA. RivettiM. RoloG. RongS. S. RongF. RosiniCh. RosnerM. Q. RuanW. R. RuangyooN. SaloneA. SarantsevY. SchelhaasM. SchernauK. SchoenningM. ScodeggioW. ShanX. Y. ShanZ. J. ShangJ. F. ShangguanL. G. ShaoM. ShaoC. P. ShenH. F. ShenW. H. ShenX. Y. ShenB. A. ShiCh. Y. ShiH. ShiJ. L. ShiJ. Y. ShiM. H. ShiS. Y. ShiX. ShiH. L. SongJ. J. SongM. H. SongT. Z. SongW. M. SongY. X. SongZirong SongS. SosioS. SpataroS. StansilausF. StielerM. StolteS. S SuG. B. SunG. X. SunH. SunH. K. SunJ. F. SunK. SunL. SunR. SunS. S. SunT. SunW. Y. SunY. C. SunY. H. SunY. J. SunY. Z. SunZ. Q. SunZ. T. SunH. TabaharizatoN. T. TagsinsitC. J. TangG. Y. TangJ. TangJ. J. TangL. F. TangY. A. TangZ. H. TangL. Y. TaoM. TatJ. X. TengJ. Y. TianW. H. TianY. TianZ. F. TianK. Yu. TodyshevI. UmanE. van der SmagtB. WangBin WangBo WangC. WangChao WangCong WangD. Y. WangF. K. WangH. J. WangH. R. WangJ. WangJ. J. WangJ. P. WangK. WangL. L. WangL. W. WangM. WangMi WangN. Y. WangP. WangS. WangShun WangT. WangW. WangW. P. WangX. F. WangX. L. WangX. N. WangXin WangY. WangY. D. WangY. F. WangY. H. WangY. J. WangY. L. WangY. N. WangYanning WangYaqian WangYi WangYuan WangZ. WangZ. L. WangZ. Q. WangZ. Y. WangZhi WangZiyi WangD. WeiD. H. WeiD. J. WeiH. R. WeiF. WeidnerH. R. WenS. P. WenU. WiednerG. WilkinsonJ. F. WuL. H. WuL. J. WuLianjie WuS. G. WuS. M. WuX. W. WuZ. WuH. L. XiaL. XiaB. H. XiangD. XiaoG. Y. XiaoH. XiaoY. L. XiaoZ. J. XiaoC. XieK. J. XieY. XieY. G. XieY. H. XieZ. P. XieT. Y. XingD. B. XiongG. F. XuH. Y. XuQ. J. XuQ. N. XuT. D. XuX. P. XuY. XuY. C. XuZ. S. XuF. YanL. YanW. B. YanW. C. YanW. H. YanW. P. YanX. Q. YanY. Y. YanH. J. YangH. L. YangH. X. YangJ. H. YangR. J. YangX. Y. YangY. YangY. G. YangY. H. YangY. M. YangY. Q. YangY. Z. YangYouhua YangZ. Y. YangW. J. YaoZ. P. YaoM. YeM. H. YeZ. J. YeK. YiJunhao YinZ. Y. YouB. X. YuC. X. YuG. YuJ. S. YuL. W. YuT. YuX. D. YuY. C. YuYongchao YuC. Z. YuanH. YuanJ. YuanJie YuanL. YuanM. K. YuanS. H. YuanY. YuanC. X. YueYing YueA. A. ZafarF. R. ZengS. H. ZengX. ZengY. J. ZengYujie ZengY. C. ZhaiY. H. ZhanB. L. ZhangB. X. ZhangD. H. ZhangG. Y. ZhangGengyuan ZhangH. ZhangH. C. ZhangH. H. ZhangH. L. ZhangH. Q. ZhangH. R. ZhangH. Y. ZhangHan ZhangJ. ZhangJ. J. ZhangJ. L. ZhangJ. Q. ZhangJ. S. ZhangJ. W. ZhangJ. X. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Z. ZhangJianyu ZhangJin ZhangJiyuan ZhangL. M. ZhangLei ZhangN. ZhangP. ZhangQ. ZhangQ. Y. ZhangQ. Z. ZhangR. Y. ZhangS. H. ZhangS. N. ZhangShulei ZhangX. M. ZhangX. Y. ZhangY. T. ZhangY. H. ZhangY. P. ZhangYao ZhangYu ZhangYu ZhangZ. ZhangZ. D. ZhangZ. H. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. X. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZh. Zh. ZhangZhilong ZhangZiyang ZhangZiyu ZhangG. ZhaoJ. -P. ZhaoJ. Y. ZhaoJ. Z. ZhaoL. ZhaoLei ZhaoM. G. ZhaoR. P. ZhaoS. J. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoY. L. ZhaoY. P. ZhaoY. X. ZhaoZ. G. ZhaoA. ZhemchugovB. ZhengB. M. ZhengJ. P. ZhengW. J. ZhengW. Q. ZhengX. R. ZhengY. H. ZhengB. ZhongC. ZhongX. ZhongH. ZhouJ. Q. ZhouS. ZhouX. ZhouX. K. ZhouX. R. ZhouX. Y. ZhouY. X. ZhouY. Z. ZhouA. N. ZhuJ. ZhuK. ZhuK. J. ZhuK. S. ZhuL. X. ZhuLin ZhuS. H. ZhuT. J. ZhuW. D. ZhuW. J. ZhuW. Z. ZhuY. C. ZhuZ. A. ZhuX. Y. ZhuangM. ZhugeJ. H. ZouJ. Zuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20962v2Measurement of inclusive $J/ψ$ production in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 54.4$ GeV at STAR2026-05-26T02:39:03ZThis article presents measurements of inclusive $J/ψ$ production at midrapidity ($\left|y\right| <$ 1.0) in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 54.4$ GeV with the STAR detector at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. A suppression of the $J/ψ$ yield, quantified using the nuclear modification factors ($R_{\mathrm{AA}}$, $R_{\mathrm{CP}}$), is observed with respect to the scaled production in $p$+$p$ collisions. The dependence of $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ on collision centrality and $J/ψ$ transverse momentum is measured with improved precision compared to previous measurements at 39 and 62.4 GeV, while the centrality dependence of $R_{\mathrm{CP}}$ is measured and compared to the same results at 39, 62.4, and 200 GeV. In central collisions, no significant collision energy dependence of $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ is found within uncertainties for collision energies between 17.3 and 200 GeV. Two transport model calculations that include dissociation and regeneration contributions are consistent with the experimental results within uncertainties. Although no significant collision energy dependence of the $J/ψ$ suppression in high energy heavy-ion collisions up to $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 200$ GeV is observed within uncertainties, the newly measured results at 54.4 GeV Au+Au collisions provide additional constraints on theoretical calculations of the hot medium evolution and cold nuclear matter effects.2025-06-26T03:00:37Zpublished by Physics Letters BPhys. Lett. B 877 (2026) 140405 The STAR Collaboration10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140405http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26462v1Search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV2026-05-26T02:19:32ZA search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying to two Z bosons, each subsequently decaying to a pair of electrons or muons, is presented. The results are based on a proton-proton collision data set collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The search is performed over a wide range of resonance masses from 130 GeV to 3 TeV, considering both narrow- and broad-width scenarios, and considering the gluon fusion and vector boson fusion production processes. For the broad-width scenario, the interference between the new resonance, the 125 GeV Higgs boson production, and the continuum background is taken into account. No significant excess with respect to the standard model background expectation is observed in the examined phase space. Upper limits at the 95% confidence level are set on the product of the heavy scalar resonance production cross section and the branching fraction for its decay into two Z bosons. The exclusion limits range from 0.05$-$0.1 pb in the low-mass region to 0.00 pb in the high-mass region.2026-05-26T02:19:32ZSubmitted to the Journal of High Energy Physics. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-24-002 (CMS Public Pages) CMS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23013v2Continuous coherent spin-frequency metrology in storage rings via resonant beam-driven detection2026-05-26T02:18:48ZPrecision measurements in storage rings are increasingly limited by the ability to monitor collective spin dynamics coherently over long time scales. Existing polarimetry techniques rely on destructive scattering processes that preclude continuous, non-intercepting tracking of spin evolution and constrain both statistical sensitivity and systematic control. Here we introduce a non-destructive, phase-coherent polarimetry method in which the stored beam polarization is treated as a continuous dynamical observable rather than a quantity inferred from scattering events. Spin-dependent electromagnetic fields generated by a polarized relativistic beam establish a symmetry-selected differential signal on pickup electrodes. This signal is transduced into a narrowband phase modulation of a high-Q resonator interrogated with a coherent probe, while dominant charge-induced backgrounds are rejected through geometric symmetry, helicity reversal, and synchronous demodulation. Controlled spin precession (spin-wheel operation) provides a stable phase reference enabling phase-coherent detection of slow spin evolution. Combined with optimized lattice symmetry and beam cooling, this approach can substantially extend the usable spin coherence time, with values approaching 10^5 s appearing realistic within existing accelerator technology. The resulting readout supports optimal slope-based estimation with T^{-3/2} statistical scaling while eliminating the efficiency penalties inherent to scattering-based polarimetry. For storage-ring EDM experiments, this combination enables sensitivity approaching the level expected within the Standard Model. More broadly, the method establishes a general phase-coherent architecture for collective spin measurements in storage rings, adapting resonant sensing concepts from axion dark-matter searches to charged-particle precision experiments.2026-05-21T20:35:58Z32 pages, 3 figures. v2 includes corrected author list/metadata and minor revisions to the manuscriptYounggeun KimThemis BowcockDmitry BudkerGiovanni CantatoreHooman DavoudiaslDmitry DenisovAbhay DeshpandeWolfram FischerSelcuk HaciomerogluHaixin HuangDavid KawallAlexander KeshavarziOn KimIvan KoopValeri LebedevJonathan LeeWilliam M. MorseCenap OzbenVincent SchoeferYannis K. SemertzidisEleftherios SkordisEdward StephensonVladimir TishchenkoNicholaos TsoupasGraziano VenanzoniJoost VossebeldPeter Winter