https://arxiv.org/api/3CnQkCpRP0UT3aa/hkqXroE295Y2026-06-13T15:01:52Z6038519515http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17006v2Probing the nature of the $χ_{c1}(3872)$ state using radiative decays2026-05-30T09:14:09ZThe radiative decays $χ_{c1}(3872)\rightarrowψ(2S)γ$ and $χ_{c1}(3872)\rightarrow J/ψγ$ are used to probe the~nature of the~$χ_{c1}(3872)$ state using proton-proton collision data collected with the LHCb detector, corresponding to an~integrated luminosity of~9fb$^{-1}$. Using the~$B^+\rightarrow χ_{c1}(3872)K^+$decay, the $χ_{c1}(3872)\rightarrow ψ(2S)γ$ process is observed for the first time and the ratio of its partial width to that of the $χ_{c1}(3872)\rightarrow J/ψγ$ decay is measured to be $$ \frac{Γ_{χ_{c1}(3872)\rightarrow ψ(2S)γ}}
{Γ_{χ_{c1}(3872)\rightarrow J/ψγ}} = 1.67 \pm 0.21 \pm 0.12 \pm0.04 , $$ where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic and the third is due to the uncertainties on the branching fractions of the $ψ(2S)$ and $J/ψ$ mesons. The measured ratio makes the interpretation of the $χ_{c1}(3872)$ state as a~pure $D^0\bar{D}^{*0}+\bar{D}^0D^{*0}$ molecule questionable and strongly indicates a sizeable compact charmonium or tetraquark component within the $χ_{c1}(3872)$ state.2024-06-24T17:51:17Z31 pages, 2 figures. All figures and tables, along with any supplementary material and additional information, are available at https://cern.ch/lhcbproject/Publications/p/LHCb-PAPER-2024-015.html (LHCb public pages)JHEP 11 (2024) 121 LHCb collaborationR. AaijA. S. W. AbdelmottelebC. Abellan BetetaF. AbudinénT. AckernleyA. A. AdefisoyeB. AdevaM. AdinolfiP. AdlarsonC. AgapopoulouC. A. AidalaZ. AjaltouniS. AkarK. AkibaP. AlbicoccoJ. AlbrechtF. AlessioM. AlexanderZ. AlioucheP. Alvarez CartelleR. AmalricS. AmatoJ. L. AmeyY. AmhisL. AnL. AnderliniM. AnderssonA. AndreianovP. AndreolaM. AndreottiD. AndreouA. AnelliD. AoF. ArchilliM. ArgentonS. Arguedas CuendisA. ArtamonovM. ArtusoE. AslanidesR. Ataide Da SilvaM. AtzeniB. AudurierD. BacherI. Bachiller PereaS. BachmannM. BachmayerJ. J. BackP. Baladron RodriguezV. BalaguraW. BaldiniL. BalzaniH. BaoJ. Baptista de Souza LeiteC. Barbero PretelM. BarbettiI. R. BarbosaR. J. BarlowM. BarnyakovS. BarsukW. BarterM. BartoliniJ. BartzJ. M. BaselsS. BashirG. BassiB. BatsukhP. B. BattistaA. BayA. BeckM. BeckerF. BedeschiI. B. BediagaN. B. BehlingS. BelinV. BelleeK. BelousI. BelovI. BelyaevG. BenaneG. BencivenniE. Ben-HaimA. BerezhnoyR. BernetS. Bernet AndresA. BertolinC. BetancourtF. BettiJ. BexIa. BezshyikoJ. BhomM. S. BiekerN. V. BiesuzP. BilloirA. BiolchiniM. BirchF. C. R. BishopA. BitadzeA. BizzetiT. BlakeF. BlancJ. E. BlankS. BluskV. BocharnikovJ. A. BoelhauveO. Boente GarciaT. BoettcherA. BohareA. BoldyrevC. S. BolognaniR. BolzonellaN. BondarF. BorgatoS. BorghiM. BorsatoJ. T. BorsukS. A. BouchibaM. BovillT. J. V. BowcockA. BoyerC. BozziA. Brea RodriguezN. BreerJ. BrodzickaA. Brossa GonzaloJ. BrownD. BrunduE. BuchananA. BuonauraL. BuonincontriA. T. BurkeC. BurrA. ButkevichJ. S. ButterJ. BuytaertW. ByczynskiS. CadedduH. CaiA. C. CailletR. CalabreseS. Calderon RamirezL. CaleficeS. CaliM. CalviM. Calvo GomezP. Camargo MagalhaesJ. I. Cambon BouzasP. CampanaD. H. Campora PerezA. F. Campoverde QuezadaS. CapelliL. CapriottiR. Caravaca-MoraA. CarboneL. Carcedo SalgadoR. CardinaleA. CardiniP. CarnitiL. CarusA. Casais VidalR. CasparyG. CasseJ. Castro GodinezM. CattaneoG. CavalleroV. CavalliniS. CelaniD. CervenkovS. CesareA. J. ChadwickI. ChahrourM. CharlesPh. CharpentierE. ChatzianagnostouC. A. Chavez BarajasM. ChefdevilleC. ChenS. ChenZ. ChenA. ChernovS. ChernyshenkoX. ChiotopoulosV. ChobanovaS. CholakM. ChrzaszczA. ChubykinV. ChulikovP. CiambroneX. Cid VidalG. CiezarekP. CifraP. E. L. ClarkeM. ClemencicH. V. CliffJ. ClosierC. Cocha ToapaxiV. CocoJ. CoganE. CognerasL. CojocariuP. CollinsT. ColomboM. C. ColonnaA. Comerma-MontellsL. CongedoA. ContuN. CookeI. CorredoiraA. CorreiaG. CortiJ. J. Cottee MeldrumB. CouturierD. C. CraikM. Cruz TorresE. Curras RiveraR. CurrieC. L. Da SilvaS. DadabaevL. DaiX. DaiE. Dall'OccoJ. DalsenoC. D'AmbrosioJ. DanielA. DanilinaP. d'ArgentA. DavidsonJ. E. DaviesA. DavisO. De Aguiar FranciscoC. De AngelisF. De BenedettiJ. de BoerK. De BruynS. De CapuaM. De CianU. De Freitas Carneiro Da GracaE. De LuciaJ. M. De MirandaL. De PaulaM. De SerioP. De SimoneF. De VellisJ. A. de VriesF. DebernardisD. DecampV. DeduL. Del BuonoB. DelaneyH. -P. DembinskiJ. DengV. DenysenkoO. DeschampsF. DettoriB. DeyP. Di NezzaI. DiachkovS. DidenkoS. DingL. DittmannV. DobishukA. D. DochevaC. DongA. M. DonohoeF. DordeiA. C. dos ReisA. D. DowlingW. DuanP. DudaM. W. DudekL. DufourV. DukP. DuranteM. M. DurasJ. M. DurhamO. D. DurmusA. DziurdaA. DzyubaS. EasoE. EcksteinU. EgedeA. EgorychevV. EgorychevS. EisenhardtE. EjopuL. EklundM. ElashriJ. EllbrachtS. ElyA. EneE. EppleJ. EschleS. EsenT. EvansF. FabianoL. N. FalcaoY. FanB. FangL. FantiniM. FariaK. FarmerD. FazziniL. FelkowskiM. FengM. FeoA. Fernandez CasaniM. Fernandez GomezA. D. FernezF. FerrariF. Ferreira RodriguesM. FerrilloM. Ferro-LuzziS. FilippovR. A. FiniM. FioriniK. M. FischerD. S. FitzgeraldC. FitzpatrickF. FleuretM. FontanaL. F. ForemanR. FortyD. Foulds-HoltM. Franco SevillaM. FrankE. FranzosoG. FrauC. FreiD. A. FridayJ. FuQ. FuehringY. FujiiT. FulghesuE. GabrielG. GalatiM. D. GalatiA. Gallas TorreiraD. GalliS. GambettaM. GandelmanP. GandiniB. GanieH. GaoR. GaoY. GaoY. GaoY. GaoM. GarauL. M. Garcia MartinP. Garcia MorenoJ. García PardiñasK. G. GargL. GarridoC. GasparR. E. GeertsemaL. L. GerkenE. GersabeckM. GersabeckT. GershonZ. GhorbanimoghaddamL. GiambastianiF. I. GiasemisV. GibsonH. K. GiemzaA. L. GilmanM. GiovannettiA. GioventùL. GirardeyP. Gironella GironellC. GiuglianoM. A. GizaE. L. GkougkousisF. C. GlaserV. V. GligorovC. GöbelE. GolobardesD. GolubkovA. GolutvinA. GomesS. Gomez FernandezF. Goncalves AbrantesM. GoncerzG. GongJ. A. GoodingI. V. GorelovC. GottiJ. P. GrabowskiL. A. Granado CardosoE. GraugésE. GraveriniL. GrazetteG. GrazianiA. T. GrecuL. M. GreevenN. A. GrieserL. GrilloS. GromovC. GuM. GuariseM. GuittiereV. GuliaevaP. A. GüntherA. -K. GuseinovE. GushchinY. GuzT. GysK. HabermannT. HadavizadehC. HadjivasiliouG. HaefeliC. HaenJ. HaimbergerM. HajheidariG. H. HallettM. M. HalvorsenP. M. HamiltonJ. HammerichQ. HanX. HanS. Hansmann-MenzemerL. HaoN. HarnewM. HartmannS. HashmiJ. HeF. HemmerC. HendersonR. D. L. HendersonA. M. HennequinK. HennessyL. HenryJ. HerdP. Herrero GasconJ. HeuelA. HicheurG. Hijano MendizabalD. HillS. E. HollittJ. HorswillR. HouY. HouN. HowarthJ. HuJ. HuW. HuX. HuW. HuangW. HulsbergenR. J. HunterM. HushchynD. HutchcroftD. IlinP. IltenA. InglessiA. IniukhinA. IshteevK. IvshinR. JacobssonH. JageS. J. Jaimes EllesS. JakobsenE. JansB. K. JashalA. JawaheryV. JevticE. JiangX. JiangY. JiangY. J. JiangM. JohnA. John Rubesh RajanD. JohnsonC. R. JonesT. P. JonesS. JoshiB. JostJ. Juan CastellaN. JurikI. JuszczakD. KaminarisS. KandybeiM. KaneY. KangC. KarM. KaracsonD. KarpenkovA. KauniskangasJ. W. KautzF. KeizerM. KenzieT. KetelB. KhanjiA. KharisovaS. KholodenkoG. KhreichT. KirnV. S. KirsebomO. KitouniS. KlaverN. KleijneK. KlimaszewskiM. R. KmiecS. KoliievL. KolkA. KonoplyannikovP. KopciewiczP. KoppenburgM. KorolevI. KostiukO. KotS. KotriakhovaA. KozachukP. KravchenkoL. KravchukM. KrepsP. KrokovnyW. KrupaW. KrzemienO. K. KshyvanskyiJ. KubatS. KubisM. KucharczykV. KudryavtsevE. KulikovaA. KupscB. K. KutsenkoD. LacarrereP. Laguarta GonzalezA. LaiA. LampisD. LancieriniC. Landesa GomezJ. J. LaneR. LaneC. LangenbruchJ. LangerO. LantwinT. LathamF. LazzariC. LazzeroniR. Le GacH. LeeR. LefèvreA. LeflatS. LegotinM. LehurauxE. Lemos CidO. LeroyT. LesiakB. LeveringtonA. LiC. LiH. LiK. LiL. LiP. LiP. -R. LiQ. LiS. LiT. LiT. LiY. LiY. LiZ. LianX. LiangS. LibralonC. LinT. LinR. LindnerV. LisovskyiR. LitvinovF. L. LiuG. LiuK. LiuS. LiuW. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. L. LiuA. Lobo SalviaA. LoiJ. Lomba CastroT. LongJ. H. LopesA. Lopez HuertasS. López SoliñoC. LucarelliD. LucchesiM. Lucio MartinezV. LukashenkoY. LuoA. LupatoE. LuppiK. LynchX. -R. LyuG. M. MaR. MaS. MaccoliniF. MachefertF. MaciucB. MackI. MackayL. M. MackeyL. R. Madhan MohanM. M. MaduraiA. MaevskiyD. MagdalinskiD. MaisuzenkoM. W. MajewskiJ. J. MalczewskiS. MaldeL. MalentaccaA. MalininT. MaltsevG. MancaG. MancinelliC. MancusoR. Manera EscaleroD. ManuzziD. MarangottoJ. F. MarchandR. MarchevskiU. MarconiS. MarianiC. Marin BenitoJ. MarksA. M. MarshallL. MartelG. MartelliG. MartellottiL. MartinazzoliM. MartinelliD. Martinez SantosF. Martinez VidalA. MassafferriR. MatevA. MathadV. MatiuninC. MatteuzziK. R. MattioliA. MauriE. MauriceJ. MauricioP. MayencourtJ. Mazorra de CosM. MazurekM. McCannL. McconnellT. H. McGrathN. T. McHughA. McNabR. McNultyB. MeadowsG. MeierD. MelnychukF. M. MengM. MerkA. MerliL. Meyer GarciaD. MiaoH. MiaoM. MikhasenkoD. A. MilanesA. MinottiE. MinucciT. MirallesB. MitreskaD. S. MitzelA. ModakR. A. MohammedR. D. MoiseS. MokhnenkoT. MombächerM. MonkS. MonteilA. Morcillo GomezG. MorelloM. J. MorelloM. P. MorgenthalerA. B. MorrisA. G. MorrisR. MountainH. MuZ. M. MuE. MuhammadF. MuheimM. MulderK. MüllerF. Muñoz-RojasR. MurtaP. NaikT. NakadaR. NandakumarT. NanutI. NastevaM. NeedhamN. NeriS. NeubertN. NeufeldP. NeustroevJ. NicoliniD. NicotraE. M. NielN. NikitinP. NogarolliP. NoggaN. S. NolteC. NormandJ. Novoa FernandezG. NowakC. NunezH. N. NurA. Oblakowska-MuchaV. ObraztsovT. OeserS. OkamuraA. OkhotnikovO. OkhrimenkoR. OldemanF. OlivaM. OloccoC. J. G. OnderwaterR. H. O'NeilD. OsthuesJ. M. Otalora GoicocheaP. OwenA. OyangurenO. OzcelikA. PadeeK. O. PadekenB. PagareP. R. PaisT. PajeroA. PalanoM. PalutanG. PanshinL. PaolucciA. PapanestisM. PappagalloL. L. PappalardoC. PappenheimerC. ParkesB. PassalacquaG. PassalevaD. PassaroA. PastoreM. PatelJ. PatocC. PatrignaniA. PaulC. J. PawleyA. PellegrinoJ. PengM. Pepe AltarelliS. PerazziniD. PereimaH. Pereira Da CostaA. Pereiro CastroP. PerretA. PerroK. PetridisA. PetroliniJ. P. PfallerH. PhamL. PicaM. PicciniB. PietrzykG. PietrzykD. PinciF. PisaniM. PizzichemiV. PlacintaM. Plo CasasusT. PoeschlF. PolciM. Poli LenerA. PoluektovN. PolukhinaI. PolyakovE. PolycarpoS. PonceD. PopovS. PoslavskiiK. PrasanthC. ProuveV. PugatchG. PunziS. QasimQ. Q. QianW. QianN. QinS. QuR. QuaglianiR. I. Rabadan TrejoJ. H. RademackerM. RamaM. Ramírez GarcíaV. Ramos De OliveiraM. Ramos PernasM. S. RangelF. RatnikovG. RavenM. Rebollo De MiguelF. RediJ. ReichF. ReissZ. RenP. K. ResmiR. RibattiG. R. RicartD. RiccardiS. RicciardiK. RichardsonM. Richardson-SlipperK. RinnertP. RobbeG. RobertsonE. RodriguesE. Rodriguez FernandezJ. A. Rodriguez LopezE. Rodriguez RodriguezJ. RoenschA. RogachevA. RogovskiyD. L. RolfP. RoloffV. RomanovskiyM. Romero LamasA. Romero VidalG. RomoliniF. RonchettiT. RongM. RotondoS. R. RoyM. S. RudolphM. Ruiz DiazR. A. Ruiz FernandezJ. Ruiz VidalA. RyzhikovJ. RyzkaJ. J. Saavedra-AriasJ. J. Saborido SilvaR. SadekN. SagidovaD. SahooN. SahooB. SaittaM. SalomoniC. Sanchez GrasI. SanderswoodR. SantacesariaC. Santamarina RiosM. SantimariaL. SantoroE. SantovettiA. SaputiD. SaraninA. S. SarnatskiyG. SarpisM. SarpisC. SatrianoA. SattaM. SaurD. SavrinaH. SazakL. G. Scantlebury SmeadA. ScarabottoS. SchaelS. ScherlM. SchillerH. SchindlerM. SchmellingB. SchmidtS. SchmittH. SchmitzO. SchneiderA. SchopperN. SchulteS. SchulteM. H. SchuneR. SchwemmerG. SchweringB. SciasciaA. SciuccatiS. SellamA. SemennikovT. SengerM. Senghi SoaresA. SergiN. SerraL. SestiniA. SeutheY. ShangD. M. ShangaseM. ShapkinR. S. SharmaI. ShchemerovL. ShchutskaT. ShearsL. ShekhtmanZ. ShenS. ShengV. ShevchenkoB. ShiQ. ShiY. ShimizuE. ShmaninR. ShorkinJ. D. ShupperdR. Silva CoutinhoG. SimiS. SimoneN. SkidmoreT. SkwarnickiM. W. SlaterJ. C. SmallwoodE. SmithK. SmithM. SmithA. SnochL. Soares LavraM. D. SokoloffF. J. P. SolerA. SolominA. SolovevI. SolovyevR. SongY. SongY. SongY. S. SongF. L. Souza De AlmeidaB. Souza De PaulaE. Spadaro NorellaE. SpedicatoJ. G. SpeerE. SpiridenkovP. SpradlinV. SriskaranF. StagniM. StahlS. StahlS. StanislausE. N. SteinO. SteinkampO. StenyakinH. StevensD. StrekalinaY. SuF. SuljikJ. SunL. SunY. SunD. S. Sundfeld LimaW. SutcliffeP. N. SwallowF. SwystunA. SzabelskiT. SzumlakY. TanM. D. TatA. TerentevF. TerzuoliF. TeubertE. ThomasD. J. D. ThompsonH. TilquinV. TisserandS. T'JampensM. TobinL. TomassettiG. TonaniX. TongD. Torres MachadoL. ToscanoD. Y. TouC. TripplG. TuciN. TuningL. H. UeckerA. UklejaD. J. UnverzagtE. UrsovA. UsachovA. UstyuzhaninU. UwerV. VagnoniG. ValentiN. Valls CanudasH. Van HeckeE. van HerwijnenC. B. Van HulseR. Van LaakM. van VeghelG. VasquezR. Vazquez GomezP. Vazquez RegueiroC. Vázquez SierraS. VecchiJ. J. VelthuisM. VeltriA. VenkateswaranM. VesterinenD. Vico BenetM. Vieites DiazX. Vilasis-CardonaE. Vilella FiguerasA. VillaP. VincentF. C. VolleD. vom BruchN. VoropaevK. VosG. VoutersC. VrahasJ. WagnerJ. WalshE. J. WaltonG. WanC. WangG. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangM. WangN. W. WangR. WangX. WangX. WangX. W. WangY. WangZ. WangZ. WangZ. WangJ. A. WardM. WaterlaatN. K. WatsonD. WebsdaleY. WeiJ. WendelB. D. C. WesthenryC. WhiteM. WhiteheadE. WhiterA. R. WiederholdD. WiednerG. WilkinsonM. K. WilkinsonM. WilliamsM. R. J. WilliamsR. WilliamsZ. WilliamsF. F. WilsonW. WislickiM. WitekL. WitolaC. P. WongG. WormserS. A. WottonH. WuJ. WuY. WuK. WyllieS. XianZ. XiangY. XieA. XuJ. XuL. XuL. XuM. XuZ. XuZ. XuZ. XuD. YangK. YangS. YangX. YangY. YangZ. YangZ. YangV. YeroshenkoH. YeungH. YinC. Y. YuJ. YuX. YuanY YuanE. ZaffaroniM. ZavertyaevM. ZdybalC. ZengM. ZengC. ZhangD. ZhangJ. ZhangL. ZhangS. ZhangS. ZhangY. ZhangY. Z. ZhangY. ZhaoA. ZharkovaA. ZhelezovS. Z. ZhengX. Z. ZhengY. ZhengT. ZhouX. ZhouY. ZhouV. ZhovkovskaL. Z. ZhuX. ZhuX. ZhuV. ZhukovJ. ZhuoQ. ZouD. ZulianiG. Zunica10.1007/JHEP11(2024)121http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00597v1Investigation of the onset of deconfinement with the NA61/SHINE experiment2026-05-30T07:52:38ZHigh-energy heavy-ion collisions provide a unique framework for studying the phase transition of strongly interacting matter. The NA61/SHINE experiment, located in the North Area of CERN's SPS, is a fixed-target facility designed to perform a systematic exploration of the QCD phase diagram. This is achieved through a two-dimensional scan that varies both the beam momentum (from 13A to 150/158A GeV/c) and the size of the colliding systems (p+p, p+Pb, Be+Be, Ar+Sc, Xe+La, Pb+Pb, O+O). Such a wide scan enables detailed studies of how collision dynamics evolve with system size and energy. A central objective of the NA61/SHINE research program is to investigate the onset of deconfinement - the transition from hadronic matter to a quark-gluon plasma (QGP) - by analyzing observables such as the strangeness-to-entropy ratio, where entropy is proportional to pion yields. According to the Statistical Model of the Early Stage (SMES), this ratio is expected to exhibit a horn-like structure within the SPS energy range. This article discusses the theoretical framework of the SMES, its assumptions, and compares recent NA61/SHINE results with other experimental data worldwide, contributing to a deeper understanding of the QCD phase transition.2026-05-30T07:52:38ZA. Bazgirfor the NA61/SHINE Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00513v1Explaining the $B \to Kμ^+μ^-$ Anomaly in the Left-Right Inverse Seesaw Model2026-05-30T04:01:59ZWe investigate the long-standing anomaly in the rare decay B into Kll within the Left-Right Inverse Seesaw (LRIS) model. Global analyses of the B into s mu mu data consistently indicate a significant negative shift in the vector Wilson coefficient, $ΔC{9} \approx -1$, while the axial coefficient $ΔC{10}$ remains consistent with zero. We show that a charged-scalar/heavy-neutrino box diagram in the LRIS model naturally generates this pattern through a \emph{non-decoupling} mechanism: the right-handed coupling
produces a contribution to $ΔC{9}$ that is unsuppressed in the heavy-neutrino limit, while the simultaneous presence of a comparable left-handed Dirac Yukawa coupling ensures the automatic cancellation $ΔC{10} \approx 0$. The otherwise large contribution to $B_s$--$\bar{B}_s$ mixing is suppressed by several orders of magnitude through a GIM-like phase structure in the right-handed quark mixing matrix. A numerical scan over the model parameter space identifies a viable region, consistent with all current flavor and collider constraints. The $b \to sγ$ constraint is satisfied with two orders of magnitude to spare throughout the viable band. These results motivate correlated searches for the charged scalar and the heavy right-handed neutrinos at the LHC and future high-luminosity experiments.2026-05-30T04:01:59Z5 pages+ 1 figureDavid DelepineShaaban Khalilhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13569v2Study of $e^{+}e^{-}\to h^{+}h^{-}J/ψ~(h=π,~K,~p)$ via initial-state radiation at Belle~II2026-05-30T02:51:19ZUsing a data sample of 427.9 fb$^{-1}$ collected by the Belle~II detector at or near the $Υ(4S)$ and $Υ(10753)$ resonances, the cross sections for $e^+e^-\to h^+h^-J/ψ$ $(h=π/K/p)$ at center-of-mass energies ranging from 3.8 GeV or the production threshold to 5.5/6.0/7.0 GeV have been measured via initial-state radiation. The cross sections for the processes $e^+e^-\to π^+π^-J/ψ$ and $e^+e^-\to K^+K^-J/ψ$ are consistent with previously published results. The cross sections for these channels obtained by combining with previous Belle results are also given. The process $e^+e^-\to p\bar p J/ψ$ is investigated for the first time. The yields are small and no significant structure is observed in the cross section versus energy. Searches for vector charmonium-like states in the $h^+h^-J/ψ$ systems, and for associated intermediate states in the $h^{\pm} J/ψ$ systems, are also presented.2026-02-14T03:05:15ZBelle II Preprint: 2026-002 KEK Preprint: 2025-42 Belle II CollaborationM. AbumusabhI. AdachiA. AggarwalL. AggarwalH. AhmedY. AhnH. AiharaN. AkopovS. AlghamdiM. AlhakamiA. AloisioN. AlthubitiK. AmosN. Anh KyC. AntonioliD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuH. BaeN. K. BaghelS. BahinipatiP. BambadeSw. BanerjeeM. BarrettM. BartlJ. BaudotA. BaurA. BeaubienF. BechererJ. BeckerJ. V. BennettF. U. BernlochnerV. BertacchiM. BertemesE. BertholetM. BessnerS. BettariniV. BhardwajF. BianchiT. BilkaD. BiswasA. BobrovD. BodrovA. BondarG. BonviciniJ. BorahA. BoschettiA. BozekM. BračkoP. BranchiniR. A. BriereT. E. BrowderA. BudanoS. BussinoQ. CampagnaM. CampajolaG. CasarosaC. CecchiM. -C. ChangP. ChangP. CheemaC. ChenL. ChenB. G. CheonC. CheshtaH. ChetriK. ChilikinJ. ChinK. ChirapatpimolH. -E. ChoK. ChoS. -J. ChoS. -K. ChoiS. ChoudhuryS. ChutiaJ. CochranJ. A. Colorado-CaicedoI. ConsignyL. CoronaJ. X. CuiE. De La Cruz-BureloS. A. De La MotteG. De NardoG. De PietroR. de SangroM. DestefanisS. DeyR. DhayalA. Di CantoJ. DingfelderZ. DoležalI. Domínguez JiménezT. V. DongX. DongM. DorigoG. DujanyP. EckerD. EpifanovJ. EppeltR. FarkasP. FeichtingerT. FerberT. FillingerC. FinckG. FinocchiaroF. FortiA. FreyB. G. FulsomA. GabrielliA. GaleE. GanievM. Garcia-HernandezR. GargG. GaudinoV. GaurV. GautamA. GazA. GellrichG. GhevondyanD. GhoshH. GhumaryanG. GiakoustidisR. GiordanoA. GiriP. Gironella GironellB. GobboR. GodangO. GogotaP. GoldenzweigW. GradlE. GrazianiD. GreenwaldY. GuanK. GudkovaI. HaideY. HanH. HayashiiS. HazraC. HeartyM. T. HedgesA. HeidelbachG. HeineI. Heredia de la CruzM. Hernández VillanuevaT. HiguchiM. HoekM. HohmannR. HoppeP. HorakX. T. HouC. -L. HsuT. HumairT. IijimaK. InamiN. IpsitaA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiP. JacksonD. JacobiW. W. JacobsE. -J. JangQ. P. JiS. JiaY. JinA. JohnsonA. B. KaliyarJ. KandraK. H. KangS. KangG. KaryanF. KeilC. KetterC. KieslingD. Y. KimH. KimJ. -Y. KimK. -H. KimH. KindoK. KinoshitaP. KodyšT. KogaS. KohaniK. KojimaA. KorobovS. KorparE. KovalenkoR. KowalewskiP. KrižanP. KrokovnyT. KuhrY. KuliiD. KumarK. KumaraT. KunigoA. KuzminY. -J. KwonS. LacapraraT. LamJ. S. LangeT. S. LauR. LeboucherF. R. Le DiberderH. LeeM. J. LeeC. LemettaisP. LeoP. M. LewisC. LiH. -J. LiL. K. LiQ. M. LiW. Z. LiY. LiY. B. LiY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyJ. LinZ. LiptakM. H. LiuQ. Y. LiuZ. LiuD. LiventsevS. LongoA. LozarT. LueckC. LyuJ. L. MaY. MaM. MaggioraS. P. MaharanaR. MaitiG. MancinelliR. ManfrediE. ManoniM. MantovanoD. MarcantonioS. MarcelloM. MarfoliC. MarinasC. MartelliniA. MartensT. MartinovL. MassaccesiM. MasudaD. MatvienkoS. K. MauryaM. MaushartJ. A. McKennaZ. Mediankin GruberováR. MehtaF. MeierD. MeleshkoM. MerolaC. MillerM. MirraK. MiyabayashiH. MiyakeR. MizukS. MonetaH. -G. MoserM. MrvarH. MurakamiR. MussaI. NakamuraM. NakaoY. NakazawaM. NarukiZ. NatkaniecA. NatochiiM. NayakM. NeuS. NishidaR. NomaruS. OgawaR. OkuboH. OnoF. OtaniP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaA. PantaS. PardiK. ParhamJ. ParkK. ParkS. -H. ParkA. PasseriS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikM. PiccoloL. E. PiilonenP. L. M. Podesta-LermaT. PodobnikA. PrakashC. PrazS. PrellE. PrencipeM. T. PrimS. PrivalovH. PurwarP. RadosS. RaizK. RavindranJ. U. RehmanM. ReifS. ReiterL. ReuterD. Ricalde HerrmannI. Ripp-BaudotG. RizzoS. H. RobertsonJ. M. RoneyA. RostomyanN. RoutS. SahaL. SalutariD. A. SandersS. SandilyaL. SanteljC. SantosV. SavinovB. ScavinoS. SchneiderM. SchnepfK. SchoenningC. SchwandaY. SeinoK. SenyoJ. SerranoM. E. SeviorC. SfientiW. ShanG. SharmaC. P. ShenX. D. ShiT. ShillingtonT. ShimasakiJ. -G. ShiuD. ShtolB. ShwartzA. SibidanovF. SimonJ. SkorupaR. J. SobieM. SobotzikA. SofferA. SokolovE. SolovievaS. SpataroK. ŠpenkoB. SpruckM. StaričP. StavroulakisS. StefkovaL. StoetzerR. StroiliM. SumihamaK. SumisawaN. SuwonjandeeM. TakahashiM. TakizawaU. TamponiS. TanakaS. S. TangK. TanidaF. TenchiniF. TestaA. ThallerT. Tien ManhO. TittelR. TiwaryE. TorassaK. TrabelsiF. F. TrantouI. TsaklidisI. UedaK. UngerY. UnnoK. UnoS. UnoP. UrquijoY. UshirodaS. E. VahsenR. van TonderK. E. VarvellM. VeronesiV. S. VismayaL. VitaleV. VobbilisettiR. VolpeM. WakaiS. WallnerM. -Z. WangA. WarburtonM. WatanabeS. WatanukiC. WesselE. WonX. P. XuB. D. YabsleyW. YanW. YanJ. YeltonK. YiJ. H. YinK. YoshiharaC. Z. YuanJ. YuanL. ZaniF. ZengB. ZhangV. ZhilichJ. S. ZhouQ. D. ZhouL. ZhuR. Žlebčíkhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00362v1Impact of Future Dihadron Production Measurements on the Transversity Distributions and Tensor Charges of the Nucleon2026-05-29T21:04:05ZWe assess the impact of future measurements of dihadron production in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering from the CLAS12 and proposed SoLID experiments at Jefferson Lab, as well as from the ePIC experiment at the future Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), on the transversity parton distribution functions (PDFs) and the corresponding tensor charges of the nucleon. To this end, we generate pseudo-data for these experiments for a proton target (CLAS12 and ePIC) and a $^3$He target (SoLID and ePIC), and we include these pseudo-data in the JAMDiFF global analysis of existing experimental dihadron data. We find that future data from Jefferson Lab will significantly reduce uncertainties in the transversity PDFs in the region of intermediate-to-large quark momentum fractions $x$, while the EIC will provide strong constraints across the entire range of $x$, allowing for the first experimental test of the predicted small-$x$ behavior of the transversity PDFs. In discussing the reduction of uncertainties in the tensor charges, we also compare the results from the data analyses with those from lattice QCD, highlighting scenarios in which compatibility or tension between the two would arise.2026-05-29T21:04:05Z17 pages, 11 figuresYorgo SawayaChristina CocuzzaGregory MatousekMatthew McEneaneyAndreas MetzDaniel PitonyakAlexei ProkudinNobuo SatoAnselm Vossenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00224v1An AI-ready, Polarized Electron-Positron Collision Dataset2026-05-29T18:00:18ZWe present a modernized, AI-ready release of reconstructed data from the SLD experiment at the SLAC Linear Collider (SLC). The dataset comprises approximately 660{,}000 reconstructed events collected at $\sqrt{s}\approx 91.2$~GeV with a highly polarized electron beam from 1996--1998. The data have been translated from legacy formats into modern, widely-used file formats with the help of AI agents. The release also includes a corpus of newly digitized SLD internal documentation. We describe the contents of both components and provide physics validation demonstrations along with illustrations of their utility for physics and machine learning research in particle physics.2026-05-29T18:00:18Z10 pages, 7 figures, 1 table. Dataset available at https://zenodo.org/records/19925960. Code available at https://github.com/HEP-KE/jazelle_reader and https://github.com/HEP-KE/sld-resurrectChi Lung ChengSimon CorrodiT. J. HobbsAlaettin Serhan MeteBenjamin Nachmanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31424v1CJ26 Global QCD Analysis with Large-$x$ Jefferson Lab 6 and 12 GeV Data2026-05-29T15:22:18ZWe present CJ26, the new CTEQ-JLab global QCD analysis that incorporates for the first time the complete suite of JLab 6 GeV DIS measurements and the first published JLab 12 GeV measurements. Focused on the large-$x$ region, the analysis utilizes the increased $Q^2$ leverage of the 12 GeV data to uniquely disentangle higher-twist effects from off-shell nucleon corrections. This leads to a highly accurate determination of the $n/p$ structure function ratio and the $d/u$ valence quark ratio, with uncertainties reduced by 30-50% and 5-10%, respectively. We highlight the critical role of experimental correlated systematic uncertainties in achieving this precision and provide the resulting NLO PDFs and structure functions in LHAPDF format for general use.2026-05-29T15:22:18ZFeedback welcome. Results available in LHAPDF format on CJ website: https://www.jlab.org/theory/cj/pdfsAlberto AccardiMatteo CeruttiCynthia E. KeppelShujie LiJ. F. OwensSanghwa ParkPeter Rissehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31391v1Deep-learning-based low-energy trigger algorithms for the Hyper-Kamiokande experiment2026-05-29T14:56:04ZModern machine learning techniques have become increasingly important in particle physics because of their powerful pattern-recognition capabilities, including in real-time data acquisition where stringent runtime constraints apply. This paper details the performance of deep-learning-based trigger algorithms for a large water Cherenkov detector such as Hyper-Kamiokande aimed at low-energy neutrino events (below 7 MeV). The performance of custom neural-network supervised classifiers is shown alongside two anomaly-detection approaches trained solely on detector noise: a pure autoencoder and an energy-based model based on Manifold Projection--Diffusion Recovery (MPDR). The supervised model shows signal identification efficiencies of 76.7% for single electrons of 3 MeV kinetic energy, significantly exceeding signal efficiencies obtained from a traditional hit-count-based trigger of 26.4%, as does the MPDR approach with 31.8%. Runtime evaluations on GPU yield per-window inference latencies well below the millisecond scale, indicating that real-time operation is feasible.2026-05-29T14:56:04Z16 pages, 6 figuresKatharina LachnerSaúl Alonso-MonsalveBenjamin RichardsDavide Sgalabernahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31325v1Revisiting Unidentified Charged-Hadron Fragmentation Functions with Modern COMPASS SIDIS Multiplicities2026-05-29T14:00:39ZWe present \texttt{HAPS-hFF1.0}, a new global QCD analysis of unidentified charged-hadron fragmentation functions (FFs) using single-inclusive electron-positron annihilation (SIA) data together with the modern COMPASS semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering (SIDIS) multiplicities. The COMPASS input consists of the 2025 proton-target measurement and the revised isoscalar-target multiplicities provided in the COMPASS addendum 2026. The extraction is performed at both next-to-leading order (NLO) and next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO), allowing us to study the perturbative stability of the QCD fit and the impact of the updated SIDIS information on the flavor structure of the FFs. We find that the modern COMPASS multiplicities can be consistently described together with the SIA data and provide important charge-separated constraints on the light-quark and antiquark FFs. The comparison between the NLO and NNLO extractions indicates a stable quark-sector determination, while the gluon FF remains less directly constrained in the present SIA+SIDIS analysis. Our results highlight the importance of the modern COMPASS SIDIS multiplicities for precision studies of unidentified charged-hadron fragmentation and for future global FF determinations. The resulting \texttt{HAPS-hFF1.0} replicas are publicly available in standard LHAPDF format.2026-05-29T14:00:39Z16 pages, 7 Figures HAPS CollaborationMaryam SoleymaniniaHamzeh KhanpourHubert SpiesbergerMajid AziziMichael KlasenHadi Hashamipourhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00171v1Dependence of two-particle azimuthal correlations on the forward rapidity gap width in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV2026-05-29T13:12:07ZOne of the most striking features of relativistic heavy ion collisions is the presence of collective flow of thousands of produced particles. This flow can be characterized by the Fourier coefficients (${V_{nΔ}}$) of the azimuthal angular distributions of charged particles, and its existence can be explained by the formation of a quark gluon plasma, which behaves as a fluid. Surprisingly, the angular distributions of particles from very small systems such as proton-lead (pPb), proton-proton (pp), electron-positron, and photon-proton ($γ$p) collisions also exhibit non-zero Fourier coefficients, raising the question of whether collective flow is present. This paper presents measurements of $V_{nΔ}$ from a sample of pPb events at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 8.16 TeV that are enriched in photon-lead ($γ$Pb) and pomeron-lead ($\mathrm{\!I\!P}$Pb) interactions by requiring no particles in the proton-going region. Measurements are made as a function of the forward rapidity gap width (the rapidity range in which no particles are found), the transverse momentum of the particles, and the multiplicity of particles in the event. The results are compared to previous measurements of pp, pPb, and $γ$p+$\mathrm{\!I\!P}$p events as well as modern event generators.2026-05-29T13:12:07ZSubmitted to Physical Review C. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIN-22-004 (CMS Public Pages) CMS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31235v1Novel Strip-like Readout Geometries in Resistive AC-coupled Silicon Detectors (RSD / AC-LGAD)2026-05-29T12:37:02ZResistive Silicon Detectors (RSD/AC-LGAD) are novel silicon detectors capable of both precise spatial and temporal resolution. Such sensors will be essential for the next generation of particle colliders (EIC, FCC-ee, CEPC, FCC-hh) and would enable the possibility of a 4D tracker. RSD sensors are typically fabricated with a pixel-like geometry that provides excellent spatial resolution in the x and y directions. However, in regions further from the interaction point, high spatial resolution in one direction (strip-like geometry) is often preferred to reduce the number of readout channels. For example, strip AC-LGADs are now the default option for the US electron ion collider (EIC). The second production of RSD sensors by Fondazione Bruno Kessler includes sensors with unconventional readout pad shapes that act as a mixture between strip-like and pixel-like readout. This work presents the first characterization of these new pad designs using the Transient Current Technique (TCT). The measurements demonstrate exceptional one-dimensional spatial resolution, confirming the potential of novel strip-like RSDs for future tracking systems.2026-05-29T12:37:02ZL. Leander GrimmLorena HahnBrendan RegneryLuca MenzioRoberta ArcidiaconoNicolo CartigliaAlexander DierlammMarkus KluteMichael Mollhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31205v1Measurement of the cross-section for the production of a $W$ boson in association with $b$-jets in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector2026-05-29T12:11:25ZThis paper presents a measurement of the production cross-section of a $W$ boson associated with one or two jets, where at least one jet originates from a $b$-quark. The data are collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{\text -1}$. Differential cross-sections are presented as a function of the transverse momentum of the $b$-jet for both the electron and muon decay modes of the $W$ boson. The results corrected for all detector effects are presented in a fiducial region defined with basic lepton and jet kinematics, and compared with theoretical predictions. The averaged fiducial cross-section of $W+b$-jets for the electron and muon channels is measured to be $16.6\pm1.9$ pb, which is consistent with the next-to-leading-order QCD prediction of $16.8\pm2.3$ pb. The relative precision of this measurement is improved by approximately a factor of two compared with the previous ATLAS measurement at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV.2026-05-29T12:11:25Z44 pages in total, author list starting page 27, 5 figures, 7 tables, submitted to JHEP. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/STDM-2022-02 ATLAS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31190v1Exploring Low Energy Excess in MINER with sapphire detectors using Convolutional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE)2026-05-29T11:56:50ZAs cryogenic detectors push toward ever-lower energy thresholds, their sensitivity is increasingly constrained by a persistent low-energy background known as the low-energy excess (LEE). We report observation of LEE in the MINER experiment using a sapphire ($\mathrm{Al_2O_3}$) detector at energies around 200 eV, with the excess reproducibly reappearing after each non-operational warm-up period. To address this limiting background, we implement an unsupervised convolutional variational autoencoder (CVAE) framework that identifies anomalous events through a reconstruction-based anomaly score.
For the first time in a pulse-shape driven analysis, we uncover a significant deviation in the rise-time of LEE events relative to Monte Carlo simulated ideal signals. Using this feature, we develop a discrimination pipeline based on rise-time selection. This method achieves up to 53\% rejection of LEE events, corresponding to an expected sensitivity improvement of nearly 10\% for MINER at HFIR.
These findings are consistent with a scenario in which a substantial fraction of the LEE originates from bulk-related defects or microfractures within the detector crystal, while leaving room for additional detector-related contributions. Our result provides a powerful, data-driven pathway for mitigating LEE and enhancing the discovery potential of next-generation cryogenic experiments.2026-05-29T11:56:50ZD. MondalW. BakerM. ChaudhuriJ. B. DentB. DuttaV. IyerA. JastramV. K. S. KashyapA. KubikK. LangR. MahapatraS. MaludzeN. MirabolfathiM. MirzakhaniB. MohantyH. NeogJ. L. NewsteadM. PlattS. SahooJ. SanderL. E. StrigariJ. Walkerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31103v1Model-Agnostic Signal Discovery with Machine Learning: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice2026-05-29T10:14:58ZSearches for new phenomena in complex scientific data are predominantly model-dependent, optimized for specific hypotheses, and therefore limited in their coverage of the space of possible signals. Recently, new AI-based model-agnostic search strategies, many of which have been pioneered in high-energy physics, have been proposed which provide a complementary paradigm, prioritizing broad exploration over tailored analyses. These techniques offer an opportunity to enhance the overall discovery potential of modern experiments, especially in regimes where theoretical guidance is scarce. In this document, we review the conceptual framework behind the main classes of AI-based model-agnostic strategies. We discuss the potential pitfalls of these methods, and strategies for their validation and interpretation. We aim for this document to serve as a useful reference both for practitioners and for researchers interested in learning more about these model-agnostic search strategies.2026-05-29T10:14:58Z37 pages, 7 figures. Part of the VERaiPHY initiativeOz AmramMarco LetiziaMikael Kuuselahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24209v3Performance of an LYSO-Based Active Converter for a Conversion Spectrometer aiming for 52.8 MeV photon detection in Future $μ^+ \to e^+ γ$ Search Experiments2026-05-29T09:38:38ZTo facilitate future $μ^+ \to e^+ γ$ search experiments with a branching-ratio sensitivity of $10^{-15}$, we are developing a conversion spectrometer that incorporates an active LYSO converter. The converter generates $e^+e^-$ pairs from incident photons while simultaneously measuring their energy deposition and timing, thereby enabling precise reconstruction of 52.8 MeV photons. The design goals include a time resolution of 30 ps and an energy resolution of 200 keV for the detection of 52.8 MeV photons. Based on simulation studies, we optimized the converter thickness and segment dimensions, followed by the fabrication of prototype LYSO segments. The single-MIP detection performance of these prototypes was evaluated using an electron beam at the KEK PF-AR test beamline. The prototypes demonstrated excellent performance, achieving a time resolution of 25 ps and a light yield of $10^4$ photoelectrons, both of which significantly exceed the design requirements.2025-12-30T13:22:15ZSei BanLukas GerritzenFumihito IkedaToshiyuki IwamotoWataru OotaniAtsushi OyaRei SakakibaraRintaro Yokota