https://arxiv.org/api/ZNNBlPaHGQknS3HFUAjw7Uld5d02026-04-05T13:15:23Z5969018015http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01460v2CaloClouds3: Ultra-Fast Geometry-Independent Highly-Granular Calorimeter Simulation2026-03-24T18:01:18ZWe present CaloClouds3, a model for the fast simulation of photon showers in the barrel of a high granularity detector. This iteration demonstrates for the first time how a pointcloud model can employ angular conditioning to replicate photons at all incident angles. Showers produced by this model can be used across the whole detector barrel, due to specially produced position agnostic training data. With this flexibility, the model is usable in a full simulation and reconstruction chain, which offers a further handle for evaluating physics performance of the model. As inference time is a crucial consideration for a generative model, the pre-processing and hyperparameters are aggressively optimised, achieving a speed up factor of two orders of magnitude over Geant4 at inference.2025-11-03T11:21:21Z28 pages, 19 figuresJINST 21 (2026) 03, P03018Thorsten BussHenry Day-HallFrank GaedeGregor KasieczkaKatja KrügerAnatolii KorolThomas MadlenerPeter McKeownMartina MozzanicaLorenzo Valente10.1088/1748-0221/21/03/P03018http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23593v1Searching for Anomalies with Foundation Models2026-03-24T18:00:00ZFoundation models have the potential to extend the discovery reach for anomaly detection searches. When studying the large OmniLearned foundation model on data from the CMS experiment, unexpected behavior was observed in a mass sideband. The purpose of this paper is to perform a full analysis, including a complete background estimate, on the phase space picked out by the large model. We find that the background estimation describes the data well in validation regions, but is unable to accurately model the signal region. We invite further scrutiny of these events and our methods.2026-03-24T18:00:00Z19 pages, 21 figuresVinicius MikuniBenjamin Nachmanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23454v1Search for new particles decaying into top quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV2026-03-24T17:26:37ZA search for new particles decaying to top quark-antiquark pairs is performed using proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data set recorded with the CMS detector between 2016 and 2018 is used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Final states with 0, 1, and 2 leptons are analyzed, covering all decay modes of the top quark-antiquark pairs. Heavy Z' bosons with relative widths of 1, 10, and 30% are excluded for masses in the ranges 0.4$-$4.8, 0.4$-$6.2, and 0.4$-$7.4 TeV, respectively. A Kaluza$-$Klein gluon in the Randall$-$Sundrum model and a dark-matter mediator are excluded for masses between 0.5$-$5.5 and 1.0$-$4.2 TeV, respectively. These results set the most stringent limits to date for the considered models in the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ final state. In addition, in the two-Higgs-doublet models, upper limits are set on the coupling strength modifier for scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs bosons with relative widths of 2.5, 10, and 25% in the mass range of 0.5$-$1.0 TeV.2026-03-24T17:26:37ZSubmitted to the Journal of High Energy Physics. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/B2G-25-009 (CMS Public Pages) CMS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23418v1Resonant Parameters of Vector Charmonium-like States above 4.4 GeV2026-03-24T16:51:54ZWe analysis the $\sqrt{s}$-dependent line shapes of the $e^+e^-\to D_s^{+}D_{s1}^{*-}(2536)$, $D_s^{+}D_{s2}^{*-}(2573)$, $φχ_{c1,2}$, $K^+K^-J/ψ$, $K_S^0 K_S^0 J/ψ$, and $K^+K^-ψ(2S)$ cross sections measured by the BESIII experiment using the four resonant structures $ψ(4230)$, $ψ(4500)$, $ψ(4660)$, and $ψ(4710)$, by performing a simultaneous $χ^2$-minimized fit. Their masses and widths are obtained. We find that the processes $e^+e^-\to D_s^{+}D_{s1}^{*-}(2536)$, $e^+e^-\to D_s^{+}D_{s2}^{*-}(2573)$, and $e^+e^-\to φχ_{c1,2}$ are all dominantly produced via the $ψ(4660)$ and $ψ(4710)$ decays.2026-03-24T16:51:54Z6 pages, 2 figuresChunhua LiWanting LiuLinfa TangYing Dinghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23356v1Contrastive Metric Learning for Point Cloud Segmentation in Highly Granular Detectors2026-03-24T15:55:36ZWe propose a novel clustering approach for point-cloud segmentation based on supervised contrastive metric learning (CML). Rather than predicting cluster assignments or object-centric variables, the method learns a latent representation in which points belonging to the same object are embedded nearby while unrelated points are separated. Clusters are then reconstructed using a density-based readout in the learned metric space, decoupling representation learning from cluster formation and enabling flexible inference. The approach is evaluated on simulated data from a highly granular calorimeter, where the task is to separate highly overlapping particle showers represented as sets of calorimeter hits. A direct comparison with object condensation (OC) is performed using identical graph neural network backbones and equal latent dimensionality, isolating the effect of the learning objective. The CML method produces a more stable and separable embedding geometry for both electromagnetic and hadronic particle showers, leading to improved local neighbourhood consistency, a more reliable separation of overlapping showers, and better generalization when extrapolating to unseen multiplicities and energies. This translates directly into higher reconstruction efficiency and purity, particularly in high-multiplicity regimes, as well as improved energy resolution. In mixed-particle environments, CML maintains strong performance, suggesting robust learning of the shower topology, while OC exhibits significant degradation. These results demonstrate that similarity-based representation learning combined with density-based aggregation is a promising alternative to object-centric approaches for point cloud segmentation in highly granular detectors.2026-03-24T15:55:36ZMax Marriott-ClarkeLazar NovakovicElizabeth RatzerRobert J. BainbridgeLoukas GouskosBenedikt Maierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23337v1Dark Matter Detection through Rydberg Atom Transducer2026-03-24T15:39:27ZUltralight bosonic dark matter with masses in the meV range, corresponding to terahertz (THz) Compton frequencies, remains largely unexplored due to the difficulty of achieving both efficient signal conversion and single-photon-sensitive detection at THz frequencies. We propose a hybrid detection architecture that integrates a dielectric haloscope, Rydberg-atom transducer, and superconducting nanowire single-photon detection within a unified cryogenic platform operating at $\lesssim 1\,\text{K}$. The dielectric haloscope converts dark matter into THz photons via phase-matched resonant enhancement, achieving form factors $C \sim 0.4$ and loaded quality factors $Q_L \sim 10^4$. A cold $^{87}$Rb ensemble then coherently up-converts the THz signal to the optical domain through six-wave mixing among Rydberg states. The intrinsic directionality and narrow bandwidth ($Δν_{\mathrm{atomic}} \sim 1\,\text{MHz}$) of this process provide extra suppression of isotropic thermal backgrounds. With 10 days of integration at $0.3\,\text{K}$, we project sensitivity to the axion-photon coupling $g_{aγγ} \sim 10^{-13}\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$ at $m_a \sim 0.4\,\text{meV}$, reaching the QCD axion band and opening the THz window for searches of both axion and dark photon dark matter.2026-03-24T15:39:27Z12 pages, 5 figures, 3 tablesJ. F. ChenHaokun FuChristina GaoJing ShuGeng-Bo WuPeiran YinYi-Ming ZhongYing Zuohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23287v1Five-flavor molecular pentaquarks in the $Ξ_b^{(\prime,\,*)} \bar D^{(*)}$ and $Ξ_c^{(\prime,\,*)} B^{(*)}$ systems2026-03-24T14:51:44ZThe discovery of hidden-charm pentaquarks and open-flavor tetraquarks motivates the search for even more exotic hadron configurations. In this work, we investigate genuinely exotic molecular pentaquark candidates comprising five different flavors, focusing on the $Ξ_b^{(\prime,\,*)} \bar D^{(*)}$ and $Ξ_c^{(\prime,\,*)} B^{(*)}$ systems. Employing the one-boson-exchange model with the $S$-$D$ wave mixing and coupled-channel dynamics, we identify the most promising molecular pentaquark candidates comprising five different flavors. These include the $Ξ_b \bar D$, $Ξ_b^{\prime} \bar D$, $Ξ_c B$, and $Ξ_c^{\prime} B$ states with $I(J^P)=0(1/2^-)$, the $Ξ_b \bar D^{*}$, $Ξ_b^{\prime} \bar D^{*}$, $Ξ_c B^{*}$, and $Ξ_c^{\prime} B^{*}$ states with $I(J^P)=0(1/2^-,\,3/2^-)$, the $Ξ_b^{*} \bar D$ and $Ξ_c^{*} B$ states with $I(J^P)=0(3/2^-)$, as well as the $Ξ_b^{*} \bar D^{*}$ and $Ξ_c^{*} B^{*}$ states with $I(J^P)=0(1/2^-,\,3/2^-,\,5/2^-)$. Importantly, these loosely bound states exhibit pronounced spin splittings across different total angular momentum configurations after incorporating the spin-dependent interactions or the channel couplings. In addition, we identify several possible isovector molecular pentaquark candidates within the $Ξ_b^{(\prime,\,*)} \bar D^{(*)}$ and $Ξ_c^{(\prime,\,*)} B^{(*)}$ systems. Our predictions provide clear targets for experimental searches at facilities such as LHCb and Belle II, where the unique five-flavor quark configuration offers a distinctive experimental signature.2026-03-24T14:51:44Z14 pages, 2 figures, and 8 tablesFu-Lai WangXiang Liuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12853v2R&D Efforts in Cherenkov Imaging Technologies for Particle Identification in Future Experiments2026-03-24T14:22:28ZCherenkov imaging detectors will continue to play a central role for particle identification in future particle and nuclear physics experiments. Growing demands on momentum coverage, timing precision, radiation tolerance, and sustainability have driven extensive R&D in detector concepts, radiator materials, and photon sensors. This article reviews recent efforts, focusing on experiments leading advances in sensor technology, radiator materials, and the exploitation of Cherenkov photon timing to push PID limits, while highlighting synergies across experiments in addressing common challenges.2026-02-13T11:58:17Z14 pages, 4 figures, 1 tableNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment Volume 1088, August 2026, 171516Chandradoy Chatterjee10.1016/j.nima.2026.171516http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23256v1KATRIN Sensitivity to keV Sterile Neutrinos with the TRISTAN Detector Upgrade2026-03-24T14:20:45ZSterile neutrinos in the keV mass range are a well-motivated extension of the Standard Model and viable dark matter candidates. Their existence can be probed in laboratory experiments, as the admixture of a sterile state would induce a characteristic kink-like distortion in the $β$-decay electron energy spectrum. The KATRIN experiment is designed to measure the effective electron neutrino mass with sub-eV sensitivity by analyzing the endpoint region of the tritium $β$-decay spectrum. Following the completion of its neutrino mass program, KATRIN will extend its physics reach to the search for keV-scale sterile neutrinos. This effort will be enabled by the TRISTAN detector, a newly developed silicon drift detector array optimized for differential measurements at high rates and energies well below the endpoint. In this article, we present the projected sensitivity of KATRIN to keV-scale sterile neutrinos using a dedicated simulation framework. With four months of detector livetime, KATRIN has the statistical power to probe mixing amplitudes at the level of $|U_{e4}|^2 \sim 10^{-6}$ for sterile neutrino masses in the (4$-$13) keV range, significantly extending the reach of previous laboratory searches. The major experimental systematic uncertainties investigated in this work reduces the sensitivity by a factor of 10$-$50 over the same mass range.2026-03-24T14:20:45ZH. AcharyaM. AkerD. BatzlerA. BeglarianJ. BeisenkötterM. BiassoniB. BieringerY. BiondiB. BornscheinL. BornscheinM. CarminatiA. ChatrabhutiS. ChilingaryanB. A. DanielM. DescherD. Díaz BarreroP. J. DoeO. DragounG. DrexlinE. EllingerR. EngelK. ErhardtL. FallböhmerA. FeldenC. FenglerC. FioriniJ. A. FormaggioC. ForstnerF. M. FränkleG. GagliardiK. GaudaA. GavinT. GeigleT. GeierS. GentnerW. GilF. GlückC. GoupyR. GrössleK. HabibV. HannenL. HasselmannK. HelbingS. HeynsR. HillerD. HillesheimerD. HinzT. HöhnA. JansenM. KandlerK. KhosonthongkeeC. KöhlerJ. KohpeißA. KopmannN. KovacL. La CascioL. LaschingerT. LasserreJ. LauerO. LebedaS. M. LeeA. LokhovM. MarkT. Marrodán UndagoitiaA. MarstellerE. L. MartinK. McMichaelS. MertensS. MohantyJ. MostafaI. MüllerA. NavaS. NiemesI. NutiniA. OnillonD. S. ParnoM. PavanU. PinsookJ. PlößnerJ. RálišC. RodenbeckM. RölligR. SackA. SaenzR. SalomonM. SchlösserL. SchlüterS. SchneidewindU. SchnurrJ. SchürmannA. K. SchützA. SchwemmerA. SchwenckJ. SeeyangnokC. SilvaF. SimonJ. SongwadhanaD. SprengM. SteidlJ. ŠtorekX. StriblM. SturmN. SuwonjandeeN. Tan JeromeH. H. TelleL. A. ThorneT. ThümmlerK. TrostK. UrbanK. ValeriusD. VénosP. VoigtV. WallnerC. WeinheimerS. WelteJ. WendelC. WiesingerJ. F. WilkersonJ. WolfS. WüstlingJ. WydraW. XuG. Zellerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13248v2Constraining the Higgs potential using multi-Higgs production2026-03-24T13:28:27ZThe Higgs self-couplings remain only weakly constrained by current Large Hadron Collider (LHC) measurements, leaving ample room for physics beyond the Standard Model that could modify the structure of the Higgs potential. Multi-Higgs production processes provide a particularly sensitive probe of deviations in both the Higgs trilinear and quartic self-couplings. In this note, we summarize the current status of next-to-leading-order electroweak (EW) corrections to double-Higgs production computed within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory and Higgs Effective Field Theory frameworks, emphasizing how these calculations introduce sensitivity to the Higgs self-couplings beyond what is accessible at leading order. We discuss the key conceptual and technical differences between the two effective field theory approaches, including their treatment of higher-dimensional operators, renormalization procedures, and the structure of EW~two-loop amplitudes. Despite these differences, both approaches yield broadly consistent constraints, illustrating the complementarity of double- and triple-Higgs measurements. With the high-luminosity LHC and future high-energy colliders on the horizon, these developments and further advances provide an essential foundation for extracting increasingly precise information on the dynamics of EW symmetry breaking.2026-01-19T17:35:29Z25 pages, 6 figuresJia-Le DingZach GillisUlrich HaischBrian MoserHai Tao LiDavide PaganiLuca RottoliAmbresh ShivajiZong-Guo SiJian WangPhilipp WindischhoferXiao ZhangDan Zhaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06684v2First results from the E302 efficiency$\unicode{x2013}$instability experiment at the FACET-II facility2026-03-24T12:59:23ZThe beam-breakup (BBU) instability in plasma accelerators is seeded by a transverse offset between the driver and a trailing bunch. The BBU instability induces oscillations in the trailing bunch, which are detrimental to its beam quality. When the instability is large, assuming little mitigation from ion motion and energy spread, the beam suffers emittance growth, and charge can be kicked transversely out of the plasma channel. The detrimental effect on beam quality is substantially worse at high efficiencies, which places constraints on the achievable power efficiency in applications such as linear colliders, where maintaining the beam quality is required. In this paper, we present the first experimental signatures of the BBU instability in data taken in the E302 experiment at the FACET-II facility at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. We use a specific beam-optical setup and a novel method to probe for transverse instabilities on diagnostic screens downstream of a magnetic dipole spectrometer. We complement the analysis with full 3D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations of the plasma interaction using similar driver and trailing bunch parameters on a simulated FACET-II spectrometer.2026-02-06T13:16:43ZO. G. FinnerudDepartment of Physics, University of OsloE. AdliDepartment of Physics, University of OsloR. ArinielloSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryS. CordeLaboratoire d'Optique AppliquéeT. N. DalichaouchDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Los AngelesC. EmmaSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryS. GessnerSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryC. HanselDepartment of Physics, Center for Integrated Plasma Studies, University of Colorado BoulderM. J. HoganSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryC. JoshiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los AngelesD. KalvikDepartment of Physics, University of OsloA. KnetschSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryC. A. LindstrømDepartment of Physics, University of OsloM. LitosDepartment of Physics, Center for Integrated Plasma Studies, University of Colorado BoulderN. MajernikSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryK. A. MarshDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los AngelesB. D. O'SheaSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryI. RajkovicSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryS. RegoLaboratoire d'Optique AppliquéeD. StoreySLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryC. ZhangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeleshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13512v2Measurements of ttW differential cross sections and the leptonic charge asymmetry at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV2026-03-24T12:40:49ZMeasurements of properties of top quark-antiquark pair production in association with a W boson in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV are presented, using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$, recorded by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. Events are selected based on the presence of either two leptons with the same electric charge or three leptons, and multiple jets and b-tagged jets. We present measurements of differential production cross sections as a function of kinematic variables sensitive to different aspects of the process modeling, using a multivariate discriminator in the two-lepton selection region and a simple selection-based method in the three-lepton region. The normalized cross section measurements are generally consistent with the standard model expectations, while we observe larger values compared to the expectations in the absolute cross section measurements, consistent with previous inclusive cross section measurements. In addition, we measure the leptonic charge asymmetry of this process, obtaining an observed value of $A_\text{c}^{\ell}$ = $-$0.19 $^{+0.16}_{-0.18}$, consistent with the expectation of $-$0.085 $\pm$ 0.006 predicted by next-to-leading order simulations.2025-09-16T20:18:17ZReplaced with the published version. Added the journal reference and the DOI. All the figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/TOP-24-003 (CMS Public Pages)JHEP 03 (2026) 083 CMS Collaboration10.1007/JHEP03(2026)083http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12819v3Validation of the COSINE-100U NaI(Tl) Encapsulation for Low-Temperature Operation in Liquid Scintillator2026-03-24T12:29:15ZThe COSINE-100U (upgrade) will enhance the sensitivity of the COSINE-100 dark matter search by operating the detector array immersed in liquid scintillator (LS) at $-30^oC$. To validate the detector design for these conditions, we constructed a module using the COSINE-100U encapsulation and performed a dedicated long-term stability study. The module was first monitored at room temperature for ~110 days in air, followed by a one-week immersion in LAB-based LS to verify initial compatibility. Upon confirming stable optical performance, the temperature was lowered to $-33^oC$. During approximately 150 days of continuous operation at low temperature, we observed no degradation in performance. These results demonstrate the chemical and mechanical robustness of the encapsulation, confirming its suitability for the COSINE-100U physics run.2026-01-19T08:28:49Z11 pages, 5 figuresJINST 21 (2026) T03010Kihong ParkSungjin ChoLuis Eduardo FrancaChang Hyon HaJinyoung KimKyungwon KimSungHyun KimWon Kyung KimYoung Ju KoDoohyeok LeeHyun Su LeeIn Soo LeeSeo Hyun LeeSe Dong ParkGyun Ho Yu10.1088/1748-0221/21/03/T03010http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23081v1Amplitude Analysis of the Isospin-Violating Decay $J/ψ\rightarrowγηπ^{0}$2026-03-24T11:23:21ZUsing $(10087 \pm 44)\times 10^{6}$ $\jpsi$ events collected with the BESIII detector, we perform the first amplitude analysis of the process $\jpsi\toγη\piz$. The decay is dominated by the intermediate processes $\jpsi\to\piz \bo \left( \toγη\right)$, $\jpsi\to\pizρ(1450)^0 \left( \toγη\right)$ and $\jpsi\toηh_1(1170) \left( \toγ\piz\right)$. Contributions from $\jpsi\toγa_0(980)^0(\toη\piz)$, $\jpsi\toγa_2(1320)^0(\toη\piz)$ and $\jpsi\toγa_2(1700)^0(\toη\piz)$ are observed with a statistical significance exceeding $5σ$, constituting the first observation of radiative transitions of $\jpsi$ to isospin-triplet scalar mesons. The total branching fraction of $\jpsi\toγη\piz$ is measured to be \num{25.7\pm0.3\pm1.5e-6}, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. This result is consistent with the previous measurement, with the precision improved by more than a factor of two.2026-03-24T11:23:21Z14 pages, 4 figures BESIII CollaborationM. AblikimM. N. AchasovP. AdlarsonX. C. AiC. S. AkondiR. AlibertiA. AmorosoQ. AnY. H. AnY. BaiO. BakinaH. -R. BaoX. L. BaoM. BarbagiovanniV. BatozskayaK. BegzsurenN. BergerM. BerlowskiM. B. BertaniD. BettoniF. BianchiE. BiancoA. BortoneI. BoykoR. A. BriereA. BrueggemannD. CabiatiH. CaiM. H. CaiX. CaiA. CalcaterraG. F. CaoN. CaoS. A. CetinX. Y. ChaiJ. F. ChangT. T. ChangG. R. CheY. Z. CheC. H. ChenChao ChenG. ChenH. S. ChenH. Y. ChenM. L. ChenS. J. ChenS. M. ChenT. ChenW. ChenX. R. ChenX. T. ChenX. Y. ChenY. B. ChenY. Q. ChenZ. K. ChenJ. ChengL. N. ChengS. K. ChoiX. ChuG. CibinettoF. CossioJ. Cottee-MeldrumH. L. DaiJ. P. DaiX. C. DaiA. DbeyssiR. E. de BoerD. DedovichC. Q. DengZ. Y. DengA. DenigI. DenisenkoM. DestefanisF. De MoriE. Di FioreX. X. DingY. DingY. X. DingYi. DingJ. DongL. Y. DongM. Y. DongX. DongM. C. DuS. X. DuShaoxu DuX. L. DuY. Q. DuY. Y. DuanZ. H. DuanP. EgorovG. F. FanJ. J. FanY. H. FanJ. FangJin FangS. S. FangW. X. FangY. Q. FangL. FavaF. FeldbauerG. FeliciC. Q. FengJ. H. FengL. FengQ. X. FengY. T. FengM. FritschC. D. FuJ. L. FuY. W. FuH. GaoY. GaoY. N. GaoY. Y. GaoYunong GaoZ. GaoS. GarbolinoI. GarziaL. GeP. T. GeZ. W. GeC. GengE. M. GersabeckA. GilmanK. GoetzenJ. GollubJ. B. GongJ. D. GongL. GongW. X. GongW. GradlS. GramignaM. GrecoM. D. GuM. H. GuC. Y. GuanA. Q. GuoH. GuoJ. N. GuoL. B. GuoM. J. GuoR. P. GuoX. GuoY. P. GuoZ. GuoA. GuskovJ. GutierrezJ. Y. HanT. T. HanX. HanF. HanischK. D. HaoX. Q. HaoF. A. HarrisC. Z. HeK. K. HeK. L. HeF. H. HeinsiusC. H. HeinzY. K. HengC. HeroldP. C. HongG. Y. HouX. T. HouY. R. HouZ. L. HouH. M. HuJ. F. HuQ. P. HuS. L. HuT. HuY. HuY. X. HuZ. M. HuG. S. HuangK. X. HuangL. Q. HuangP. HuangX. T. HuangY. P. HuangY. S. HuangT. HussainN. HüskenN. in der WiescheJ. JacksonQ. JiQ. P. JiW. JiX. B. JiX. L. JiY. Y. JiL. K. JiaX. Q. JiaD. JiangH. B. JiangS. J. JiangX. S. JiangY. JiangJ. B. JiaoJ. K. JiaoZ. JiaoL. C. L. JinS. JinY. JinM. Q. JingX. M. JingT. JohanssonS. KabanaX. L. KangX. S. KangB. C. KeV. KhachatryanA. KhoukazO. B. KolcuB. KopfL. KrögerL. KrümmelY. Y. KuangM. KuessnerX. KuiN. KumarA. KupscW. KühnQ. LanW. N. LanT. T. LeiM. LellmannT. LenzC. LiC. H. LiC. K. LiChunkai LiCong LiD. M. LiF. LiG. LiH. B. LiH. J. LiH. L. LiH. N. LiH. P. LiHui LiJ. N. LiJ. S. LiJ. W. LiK. LiK. L. LiL. J. LiLei LiM. H. LiM. R. LiM. T. LiP. L. LiP. R. LiQ. M. LiQ. X. LiR. LiS. LiS. X. LiS. Y. LiShanshan LiT. LiT. Y. LiW. D. LiW. G. LiX. LiX. H. LiX. K. LiX. L. LiX. Y. LiX. Z. LiY. LiY. G. LiY. P. LiZ. H. LiZ. J. LiZ. L. LiZ. X. LiZ. Y. LiC. LiangH. LiangY. F. LiangY. T. LiangG. R. LiaoL. B. LiaoM. H. LiaoY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyA. LimphiratC. C. LinC. X. LinD. X. LinT. LinB. J. LiuB. X. LiuC. LiuC. X. LiuF. LiuF. H. LiuFeng LiuG. M. LiuH. LiuH. B. LiuH. M. LiuHuihui LiuJ. B. LiuJ. J. LiuK. LiuK. Y. LiuKe LiuKun LiuL. LiuL. C. LiuLu LiuM. H. LiuP. L. LiuQ. LiuS. B. LiuT. LiuW. M. LiuW. T. LiuX. LiuX. K. LiuX. L. LiuX. P. LiuX. Y. LiuY. LiuY. B. LiuYi LiuZ. A. LiuZ. D. LiuZ. L. LiuZ. Q. LiuZ. X. LiuZ. Y. LiuX. C. LouH. J. LuJ. G. LuX. L. LuY. LuY. H. LuY. P. LuZ. H. LuC. L. LuoJ. R. LuoJ. S. LuoM. X. LuoT. LuoX. L. LuoZ. Y. LvX. R. LyuY. F. LyuY. H. LyuF. C. MaH. L. MaHeng MaJ. L. MaL. L. MaL. R. MaQ. M. MaR. Q. MaR. Y. MaT. MaX. T. MaX. Y. MaY. M. MaF. E. MaasI. MacKayM. MaggioraS. MaityS. MaldeQ. A. MalikH. X. MaoY. J. MaoZ. P. MaoS. MarcelloA. MarshallF. M. MelendiY. H. MengZ. X. MengG. MezzadriH. MiaoT. J. MinR. E. MitchellX. H. MoB. MosesN. Yu. MuchnoiJ. MuskallaY. NefedovF. NerlingH. NeuwirthZ. NingS. NisarQ. L. NiuW. D. NiuY. NiuC. NormandS. L. OlsenQ. OuyangS. PacettiX. PanY. PanA. PathakY. P. PeiM. PelizaeusG. L. PengH. P. PengX. J. PengY. Y. PengK. PetersK. PetridisJ. L. PingR. G. PingS. PluraV. PrasadL. PöppingF. Z. QiH. R. QiM. QiS. QianW. B. QianC. F. QiaoJ. H. QiaoJ. J. QinJ. L. QinL. Q. QinL. Y. QinP. B. QinX. P. QinX. S. QinZ. H. QinJ. F. QiuZ. H. QuJ. RademackerC. F. RedmerA. RivettiM. RoloG. RongS. S. RongF. RosiniCh. RosnerM. Q. RuanN. SaloneA. SarantsevY. SchelhaasM. SchernauK. SchoenningM. ScodeggioW. ShanX. Y. ShanZ. J. ShangJ. F. ShangguanL. G. ShaoM. ShaoC. P. ShenH. F. ShenW. H. ShenX. Y. ShenB. A. ShiCh. Y. ShiH. ShiJ. L. ShiJ. Y. ShiM. H. ShiS. Y. ShiX. ShiH. L. SongJ. J. SongM. H. SongT. Z. SongW. M. SongY. X. SongZirong SongS. SosioS. SpataroS. StansilausF. StielerM. StolteS. S SuG. B. SunG. X. SunH. SunH. K. SunJ. F. SunK. SunL. SunR. SunS. S. SunT. SunW. Y. SunY. C. SunY. H. SunY. J. SunY. Z. SunZ. Q. SunZ. T. SunH. TabaharizatoC. J. TangG. Y. TangJ. TangJ. J. TangL. F. TangY. A. TangZ. H. TangL. Y. TaoM. TatJ. X. TengJ. Y. TianW. H. TianY. TianZ. F. TianI. UmanE. van der SmagtB. WangBin WangBo WangC. WangChao WangCong WangD. Y. WangH. J. WangH. R. WangJ. WangJ. J. WangJ. P. WangK. WangL. L. WangL. W. WangM. WangMi WangN. Y. WangS. WangShun WangT. WangT. J. WangW. WangW. P. WangX. F. WangX. L. WangX. N. WangXin WangY. WangY. D. WangY. F. WangY. H. WangY. J. WangY. L. WangY. N. WangYanning WangYaqian WangYi WangYuan WangZ. WangZ. L. WangZ. Q. WangZ. Y. WangZhi WangZiyi WangD. WeiD. H. WeiD. J. WeiH. R. WeiF. WeidnerH. R. WenS. P. WenU. WiednerG. WilkinsonM. WolkeJ. F. WuL. H. WuL. J. WuLianjie WuS. G. WuS. M. WuX. W. WuZ. WuH. L. XiaL. XiaB. H. XiangD. XiaoG. Y. XiaoH. XiaoY. L. XiaoZ. J. XiaoC. XieK. J. XieY. XieY. G. XieY. H. XieZ. P. XieT. Y. XingD. B. XiongC. J. XuG. F. XuH. Y. XuQ. J. XuQ. N. XuT. D. XuX. P. XuY. XuY. C. XuZ. S. XuF. YanL. YanW. B. YanW. C. YanW. H. YanW. P. YanX. Q. YanY. Y. YanH. J. YangH. L. YangH. X. YangJ. H. YangR. J. YangX. Y. YangY. YangY. H. YangY. M. YangY. Q. YangY. Z. YangYouhua YangZ. Y. YangZ. P. YaoM. YeM. H. YeZ. J. YeJunhao YinZ. Y. YouB. X. YuC. X. YuG. YuJ. S. YuL. W. YuT. YuX. D. YuY. C. YuYongchao YuC. Z. YuanH. YuanJ. YuanJie YuanL. YuanM. K. YuanS. H. YuanY. YuanC. X. YueYing YueA. A. ZafarF. R. ZengS. H. ZengX. ZengY. J. ZengYujie ZengY. C. ZhaiY. H. ZhanB. L. ZhangB. X. ZhangD. H. ZhangG. Y. ZhangGengyuan ZhangH. ZhangH. C. ZhangH. H. ZhangH. Q. ZhangH. R. ZhangH. Y. ZhangHan ZhangJ. ZhangJ. J. ZhangJ. L. ZhangJ. Q. ZhangJ. S. ZhangJ. W. ZhangJ. X. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Z. ZhangJianyu ZhangJin ZhangJiyuan ZhangL. M. ZhangLei ZhangN. ZhangP. ZhangQ. ZhangQ. Y. ZhangQ. Z. ZhangR. Y. ZhangS. H. ZhangS. N. ZhangShulei ZhangX. M. ZhangX. Y. ZhangY. ZhangY. T. ZhangY. H. ZhangY. P. ZhangYu ZhangZ. ZhangZ. D. ZhangZ. H. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. X. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZh. Zh. ZhangZhilong ZhangZiyang ZhangZiyu ZhangG. ZhaoJ. -P. ZhaoJ. Y. ZhaoJ. Z. ZhaoL. ZhaoLei ZhaoM. G. ZhaoR. P. ZhaoS. J. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoY. L. ZhaoY. P. ZhaoY. X. ZhaoZ. G. ZhaoA. ZhemchugovB. ZhengB. M. ZhengJ. P. ZhengW. J. ZhengW. Q. ZhengX. R. ZhengY. H. ZhengB. ZhongC. ZhongH. ZhouJ. Q. ZhouS. ZhouX. ZhouX. K. ZhouX. R. ZhouX. Y. ZhouY. X. ZhouY. Z. ZhouA. N. ZhuJ. ZhuK. ZhuK. J. ZhuK. S. ZhuL. X. ZhuLin ZhuS. H. ZhuT. J. ZhuW. D. ZhuW. J. ZhuW. Z. ZhuY. C. ZhuZ. A. ZhuX. Y. ZhuangM. ZhugeJ. H. ZouJ. Zuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05507v2Challenging Spontaneous Quantum Collapse with XENONnT2026-03-24T11:02:27ZWe report on the search for X-ray radiation as predicted from dynamical quantum collapse with low-energy electronic recoil data in the energy range of 1-140 keV from the first science run of the XENONnT dark matter detector. Spontaneous radiation is an unavoidable effect of dynamical collapse models, which were introduced as a possible solution to the long-standing measurement problem in quantum mechanics. The analysis utilizes a model that for the first time accounts for cancellation effects in the emitted spectrum, which arise in the X-ray range due to the opposing electron-proton charges in xenon atoms. New world-leading limits on the free parameters of the Markovian continuous spontaneous localization and Diósi-Penrose models are set, improving previous best constraints by two orders of magnitude and a factor of five, respectively. The original values proposed for the strength and the correlation length of the continuous spontaneous localization model are excluded experimentally for the first time.2025-06-05T18:47:46Z7 pages, 3 figuresPhys. Rev. Lett. 136, 120201 (2026)E. AprileJ. AalbersK. AbeS. Ahmed MaouloudL. AlthueserB. AndrieuE. AngelinoD. Antón MartinS. R. ArmbrusterF. ArneodoL. BaudisM. BazykL. BellagambaR. BiondiA. BismarkK. BoeseA. BrownG. BrunoR. BudnikC. CaiC. CapelliJ. M. R. CardosoA. P. Cimental ChávezA. P. ColijnJ. ConradJ. J. Cuenca-GarcíaC. CurceanuV. D'AndreaL. C. Daniel GarciaM. P. DecowskiA. DeistingC. Di DonatoP. Di GangiS. DiglioK. EitelS. el MorabitA. ElykovA. D. FerellaC. FerrariH. FischerT. FlehmkeM. FliermanW. FulgioneC. FuselliP. GaemersR. GaiorF. GaoS. GhoshR. GiacomobonoF. GirardR. Glade-BeuckeL. GrandiJ. GrigatH. GuanM. GuidaP. GyorgyR. HammannA. HigueraC. HilsL. HoetzschN. F. HoodM. IacovacciY. ItowJ. JakobF. JoergY. KaminagaM. KaraP. KavriginS. KazamaP. KharbandaM. KobayashiD. KokeA. KopecH. LandsmanR. F. LangL. LevinsonI. LiS. LiS. LiangZ. LiangY. -T. LinS. LindemannK. LiuM. LiuJ. LoizeauF. LombardiJ. LongJ. A. M. LopesG. M. LucchettiT. LuceY. MaC. MacolinoJ. MahlstedtA. MancusoL. ManentiS. MantiF. MarignettiT. Marrodán UndagoitiaK. MartensJ. MasbouS. MastroianniA. MelchiorreJ. MerzM. MessinaA. MichaelK. MiuchiA. MolinarioS. MoriyamaK. MoråY. MosbacherM. MurraJ. MüllerK. NiU. OberlackB. PaetschY. PanQ. PellegriniR. PeresC. PetersJ. PienaarM. PierreK. PiscicchiaG. PlanteT. R. PollmannL. PrincipeJ. QiJ. QinD. Ramírez GarcíaM. RajadoA. RavindranA. RazetoL. Redard-JacotR. SinghL. SanchezJ. M. F. dos SantosI. SarnoffG. SartorelliJ. SchreinerP. SchulteH. Schulze EißingM. SchumannL. Scotto LavinaM. SelviF. SemeriaP. ShaginS. ShiJ. ShiM. SilvaH. SimgenA. StevensC. SzyszkaA. TakedaY. TakeuchiP. -L. TanD. ThersG. TrincheroC. D. TunnellF. TönniesK. ValeriusS. VecchiS. VetterF. I. Villazon SolarG. VoltaC. WeinheimerM. WeissD. WenzC. WittwegV. H. S. WuY. XingD. XuZ. XuM. YamashitaL. YangJ. YeL. YuanG. ZavattiniM. Zhong10.1103/2jm3-4976