https://arxiv.org/api/mncSkxggOT2k4dc8RvgKbQgVN/A 2026-06-13T12:44:44Z 60385 165 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01233v2 2026-06-02T05:41:41Z

Quantum entanglement and Bell-inequality violation in $τ^+τ^-$ pairs provide a sensitive probe of quantum correlations in high-energy interactions. We present a feasibility study of $e^+e^- \to τ^+τ^-$ at the proposed Super Tau-Charm Facility based on full Monte Carlo simulation at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ GeV, focusing on the $ππ$ channel ($τ^\pm \to π^\pmν$), which offers the maximal spin-analyzing power $|κ| = 1$ and the simplest final-state topology for validating the quantum-tomography framework. We establish a consistency chain from the tree-level QED prediction through truth-level and detector-level reconstruction, yielding a reconstructed concurrence of $0.279 \pm 0.007$ with the good-solution approach. A complementary full-simulation study of the $ρρ$ channel is also briefly reported. These results demonstrate that the STCF can provide a competitive platform for precision studies of quantum correlations in $τ$-lepton pairs.

2026-05-02T04:10:09Z 6 pages, 2 figures. Contribution to the proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Future Tau-Charm Facilities in hosted by Huangshan University, in Huangshan, China, in Nov. 23 - 27, 2025 Xiaokang Li Chentao Bao Hai Chen Mingyi Liu Dayong Wang 10.1142/S0217751X26450028 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03174v1 2026-06-02T05:30:52Z

The Migdal effect predicts that a nuclear recoil can be accompanied by detectable atomic ionization or excitation signals, even at the low energies expected from interactions of sub-GeV dark matter particles with atomic nuclei. Liquid xenon-based dark matter experiments have projected substantial sensitivity gains to light dark matter based on this effect, underscoring the importance of its direct characterization in xenon. In this Letter, we draw on our theoretical and experimental studies of nuclear recoil Migdal interactions to discuss their predicted characteristics and corresponding observable signatures in liquid xenon detectors. We examine the challenges of directly observing Migdal signals using neutron-induced xenon recoils and outline possible measurement strategies and necessary background mitigation measures to allow a definitive confirmation of the Migdal effect in liquid xenon.

2026-06-02T05:30:52Z 4 pages, 3 figures Jingke Xu Jeonghwa Kim Duncan Adams Brian G. Lenardo Walter Hugh Lippincott Rouven Essig http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20330v3 2026-06-02T04:10:50Z

We measure the mass difference between $D_{s}^{*+}$ and $D_{s}^{+}$, $Δm_s$, using the decay chain $D_{s}^{*+} \to D_{s}^{+}(\to K^{+} K^{-} π^{+})π^{0}$, utilizing $e^+e^-$ annihilation data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.19 fb$^{-1}$ collected at a center-of-mass energy of 4.178 GeV with the BESIII detector. The measured value of $Δm_s = [144\,201.9 \pm 44.2({\rm stat.}) \pm 29.9({\rm syst.}) \pm 15.0({\rm PDG})]$ keV/$c^2$ is about seven times more precise than the current Particle Data Group average, where the last uncertainty is from the Particle Data Group average of the $D^{*+} - D^{+}$ mass difference.

2025-10-23T08:28:21Z BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. Bai O. Bakina Y. Ban H. -R. Bao V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. C. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du S. X. Du X. L. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang J. Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng L. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez T. T. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji X. Q. Jia Z. K. Jia D. Jiang H. B. Jiang P. C. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki X. L. Kang X. S. Kang M. Kavatsyuk B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger M. Kuessner X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li Hui Li J. R. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. X. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat D. X. Lin L. Q. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma Y. M. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Malde Q. A. Malik H. X. Mao Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti X. Pan Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi M. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S. Stansilaus F. Stieler S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian I. Uman B. Wang B. Wang Bo Wang C. Wang C. Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang H. J. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang M. Wang N. Y. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang T. J. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Y. N. Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. Wu Y. J. Wu Z. Wu L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing C. J. Xu G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu M. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang Y. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Y. C. Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan J. Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. J. Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan Shunan Zhang B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang G. Y. Zhang H. Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Z. Z. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang G. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao L. Zhao M. G. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. Zhu L. X. Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang J. H. Zou J. Zu 10.1016/j.scib.2026.04.059 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03042v1 2026-06-02T02:26:06Z

The chiral quark soliton model (CQSM) is an effective quark model of baryons maximally taking account of the most important feature of low-energy QCD, i.e., the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking of the QCD vacuum and the associated appearance of Nambu--Goldstone pions. It shares many common features with the famous Skyrme model in that the baryons are viewed as rotating hedgehog objects in both models. Despite many similarities, it turned out that the CQSM can give more realistic predictions on most baryon observables. Above all, a decisive advantage of the CQSM over the Skyrme-like models is that it can handle non-local quark--quark correlations in baryons, which is absolutely impossible within the framework of effective meson theories. This feature is decisively important for making theoretical predictions on the quark distribution functions inside the nucleon, which are defined as nucleon matrix elements of bilinear quark operators with light-cone separation. In the present paper, we try to elucidate why and how the CQSM can give successful predictions for a variety of types of nucleon quark distribution functions, especially for the flavor asymmetry of the unpolarized and longitudinally polarized sea-quark (anti-quark) distribution functions in the nucleon.

2026-06-02T02:26:06Z 40 pages, 17 figures, Invited contribution to the Special Issue of Symmetry, titled "Chiral Quark Models and Their Applications" Symmetry 18 (2026) 892 Masashi Wakamatsu 10.3390/sym18060892 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25835v2 2026-06-01T20:46:00Z

The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is a 20-kton liquid scintillator-based, low-radioactivity, multi-purpose neutrino detector located 693 meters (1800 m.w.e.) underground in the Guangdong province, China. To detect scintillation light produced in the target, the detector is equipped with 17,612 20-inch photomultipliers (PMTs), forming the Large PMT system (LPMT). In addition, 25,600 3-inch photomultipliers (the Small Photomultiplier System or SPMT) are deployed in the gaps between the LPMTs. This paper presents the design and performance of the underwater front-end electronics developed for the SPMT system. It details the individual electronics boards and their key components, the inter-board interfaces, the system-level design, and the firmware architecture that supports data acquisition and control. It also outlines mechanical and thermal integration, board validation procedures, and system performance metrics. The readout chain includes digitization of 128 PMT channels per unit, synchronized time-stamping, charge measurement, event packaging, and bandwidth management. Comprehensive validation confirms the system's readiness to meet JUNO's stringent physics goals. The underwater electronics achieve noise levels as low as 0.04 photoelectrons with minimal crosstalk (below 0.4%) and a bandwidth of 57 MB/s, ensuring reliable single photo-electron detection and operation under high-rate conditions. The SPMT system has now been fully integrated and installed in JUNO. Its commissioning and physics performance will be reported in a future publication.

2026-04-28T16:41:34Z Submitted to Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A Cédric Cerna Miao He Xiaoshan Jiang Juan Pedro Ochoa-Ricoux Frédéric Perrot Angel Abusleme Thomas Adam Fengpeng An Costas Andreopoulos Giuseppe Andronico João Pedro Athayde Marcondes de André Nikolay Anfimov Vito Antonelli Tatiana Antoshkina Didier Auguste Nikita Balashov Andrea Barresi Davide Basilico Eric Baussan Marco Beretta Antonio Bergnoli Nikita Bessonov Daniel Bick Lukas Bieger Svetlana Biktemerova Thilo Birkenfeld Simon Blyth Manuel Boehles Anastasia Bolshakova Mathieu Bongrand Clément Bordereau Matteo Borghesi Dominique Breton Augusto Brigatti Riccardo Brugnera Riccardo Bruno Antonio Budano Jose Busto Marcel Büchner Anatael Cabrera Barbara Caccianiga Hao Cai Xiao Cai Yi-zhou Cai Stéphane Callier Antonio Cammi Augustin Campeny Guofu Cao Jun Cao Yaoqi Cao Rossella Caruso Cédric Cerna Vanessa Cerrone Jinfan Chang Yun Chang Tim Charisse Chao Chen Haotian Chen Jiahui Chen Jian Chen Jing Chen Junyou Chen Pingping Chen Shaomin Chen Shiqiang Chen Yixue Chen Yu Chen Ze Chen Zhangming Chen Zhiyuan Chen Jie Cheng Yaping Cheng Yu Chin Cheng Alexander Chepurnov Alexey Chetverikov Davide Chiesa Pietro Chimenti Ziliang Chu Artem Chukanov Gérard Claverie Catia Clementi Barbara Clerbaux Claudio Coletta Chenyang Cui Luis Delgadillo Franco Ziyan Deng Xiaoyu Ding Xuefeng Ding Yayun Ding Sergey Dmitrievsky Dmitry Dolzhikov Chuanshi Dong Haojie Dong Jianmeng Dong Evgeny Doroshkevich Marcos Dracos Frédéric Druillole Ran Du Shuxian Du Katherine Dugas Stefano Dusini Hongyue Duyang Jessica Eck Andrea Fabbri Ulrike Fahrendholz Lei Fan Liangqianjin Fan Jian Fang Wenxing Fang Elia Stanescu Farilla Dmitry Fedoseev Qichun Feng Daniela Fetzer Marcellin Fotzé Amélie Fournier Aaron Freegard Ying Fu Feng Gao Alberto Garfagnini Arsenii Gavrikov Diwash Ghimire Marco Giammarchi Nunzio Giudice Maxim Gonchar Guanda Gong Guanghua Gong Yuri Gornushkin Marco Grassi Maxim Gromov Vasily Gromov Minhao Gu Xiaofei Gu Yu Gu Mengyun Guan Yuduo Guan Nunzio Guardone Rosa Maria Guizzetti Cong Guo Wanlei Guo Hajar Hacine Caren Hagner Hechong Han Yang Han Chuanhui Hao Vidhya Thara Hariharan Miao He Wei He Xinhai He Ziou He Tobias Heinz Patrick Hellmuth Yuekun Heng Rafael Herrera YuenKeung Hor Shaojing Hou Fatima Houria Yee Hsiung Bei-Zhen Hu Jun Hu Tao Hu Guihong Huang Jinhao Huang Junlin Huang Junting Huang Kaixuan Huang Shengheng Huang Tao Huang Xin Huang Xingtao Huang Yongbo Huang Jiaqi Hui Lei Huo Cédric Huss Leonard Imbert Ara Ioannisian Adrienne Jacobi Arshak Jafar Beatrice Jelmini Ignacio Jeria Xiangpan Ji Xiaolu Ji Junji Jia Cailian Jiang Chengbo Jiang Guangzheng Jiang Junjie Jiang Xiaoshan Jiang Xiaozhao Jiang Yijian Jiang Yixuan Jiang Xiaoping Jing Cécile Jollet Liam Jones Narine Kazarian Amina Khatun Khanchai Khosonthongkee Denis Korablev Konstantin Kouzakov Alexey Krasnoperov Sergey Kuleshov Sindhujha Kumaran Nikolay Kutovskiy Loïc Labit Tobias Lachenmaier Haojing Lai Cecilia Landini Lorenzo Lastrucci Sébastien Leblanc Victor Lebrin Matthieu Lecocq Ruiting Lei Rupert Leitner Petr Lenskii Demin Li Fei Li Gaosong Li Jiajun Li Meiou Li Min Li Nan Li Ruhui Li Rui Li Shanfeng Li Shuo Li Teng Li Weidong Li Xiaonan Li Yichen Li Yifan Li Yingke Li Yufeng Li Zhaohan Li Zhibing Li Zi-Ming Li An-An Liang Jiajun Liao Minghua Liao Yilin Liao Ayut Limphirat Bo-Chun Lin Guey-Lin Lin Shengxin Lin Tao Lin Xingyi Lin Jiajie Ling Xin Ling Ivano Lippi Caimei Liu Fang Liu Haidong Liu Hongbang Liu Hongjuan Liu Jianglai Liu Jiaxi Liu Jinchang Liu Kainan Liu Min Liu Qian Liu Shenghui Liu Shulin Liu Ximing Liu Xuewei Liu Yankai Liu Yiqi Liu Zhipeng Liu Zhuo Liu Lorenzo Loi Alexey Lokhov Paolo Lombardi Kai Loo Selma Conforti Di Lorenzo Haoqi Lu Junguang Lu Meishu Lu Shuxiang Lu Xianguo Lu Bayarto Lubsandorzhiev Sultim Lubsandorzhiev Livia Ludhova Arslan Lukanov Fengjiao Luo Guang Luo Jianyi Luo Shu Luo Wuming Luo Xiaojie Luo Vladimir Lyashuk Bangzheng Ma Bing Ma Qiumei Ma Si Ma Wing Yan Ma Xiaoyan Ma Xubo Ma Jihane Maalmi Jingyu Mai Marco Malabarba Yury Malyshkin Roberto Carlos Mandujano Fabio Mantovani Stefano M. Mari Agnese Martini Johann Martyn Matthias Mayer Davit Mayilyan Yue Meng Anselmo Meregaglia Lino Miramonti Marta Colomer Molla Michele Montuschi Iwan Morton-Blake Xiangyi Mu Lakshmi Murgod Massimiliano Nastasi Dmitry V. Naumov Elena Naumova Igor Nemchenok Elisabeth Neuerburg Alexey Nikolaev Feipeng Ning Zhe Ning Yujie Niu Hiroshi Nunokawa Lothar Oberauer Juan Pedro Ochoa-Ricoux Sebastian Olivares Alexander Olshevskiy Domizia Orestano Fausto Ortica Rainer Othegraven Yifei Pan Alessandro Paoloni George Parker Yatian Pei Luca Pelicci Anguo Peng Yu Peng Zhaoyuan Peng Elisa Percalli Willy Perrin Frédéric Perrot Fabrizio Petrucci Oliver Pilarczyk Artyom Popov Pascal Poussot Ezio Previtali Fazhi Qi Ming Qi Sen Qian Xiaohui Qian Zhonghua Qin Shoukang Qiu Manhao Qu Zhenning Qu Gioacchino Ranucci Reem Rasheed Thomas Raymond Alessandra Re Abdel Rebii Mariia Redchuk Bin Ren Yuhan Ren Cristobal Morales Reveco Barbara Ricci Mariam Rifai Mathieu Roche Narongkiat Rodphai Fernanda de Faria Rodrigues Aldo Romani Bedřich Roskovec Peter Rudakov Arseniy Rybnikov Andrey Sadovsky Anut Sangka Ujwal Santhosh Utane Sawangwit Michaela Schever Cédric Schwab Konstantin Schweizer Alexandr Selyunin Andrea Serafini Mariangela Settimo Junyu Shao Anurag Sharma Vladislav Sharov Hangyu Shi Jingyan Shi Yuan Shi Hexi Shi Yike Shu Yuhan Shu She Shuai Vitaly Shutov Andrey Sidorenkov Randhir Singh Apeksha Singhal Chiara Sirignano Jaruchit Siripak Monica Sisti Mikhail Smirnov Oleg Smirnov Thiago Sogo-Bezerra Sergey Sokolov Julanan Songwadhana Albert Sotnikov Achim Stahl Luca Stanco Konstantin Stankevich Hans Steiger Jochen Steinmann Tobias Sterr Matthias Raphael Stock Virginia Strati Mikhail Strizh Alexander Studenikin Aoqi Su Jun Su Guangbao Sun Mingxia Sun Xilei Sun Yongzhao Sun Zhengyang Sun Narumon Suwonjandee Fedor Šimkovic Christophe De La Taille Akira Takenaka Xiaohan Tan Haozhong Tang Jian Tang Jingzhe Tang Quan Tang Xiao Tang Yuxin Tian Igor Tkachev Tomas Tmej Marco Danilo Claudio Torri Andrea Triossi Giancarlo Troni Wladyslaw Trzaska Andrei Tsaregorodtsev Yu-Chen Tung Cristina Tuve Nikita Ushakov Carlo Venettacci Giuseppe Verde Maxim Vialkov Benoit Viaud Vit Vorobel Dmitriy Voronin Lucia Votano Pablo Walker Caishen Wang Chung-Hsiang Wang En Wang Hanwen Wang Jiabin Wang Jun Wang Li Wang Meng Wang Meng Wang Mingyuan Wang Ruiguang Wang Sibo Wang Tianhong Wang Wei Wang Wenshuai Wang Wenyuan Wang Xi Wang Yangfu Wang Yaoguang Wang Yi Wang Yifang Wang Yuyi Wang Zhe Wang Zheng Wang Zhimin Wang Apimook Watcharangkool Junya Wei Jushang Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Yuehuan Wei Zhengbao Wei Liangjian Wen Jun Weng Rosmarie Wirth Bi Wu Chengxin Wu Qun Wu Yinhui Wu Zhaoxiang Wu Zhi Wu Michael Wurm Jacques Wurtz Dongmei Xia Shishen Xian Ziqian Xiang Fei Xiao Pengfei Xiao Tianying Xiao Xiang Xiao Wei-Jun Xie Xiaochuan Xie Yuguang Xie Zhizhong Xing Benda Xu Cheng Xu Chuang Xu Donglian Xu Fanrong Xu Jiayang Xu Jilei Xu Jinghuan Xu Meihang Xu Shiwen Xu Xunjie Xu Dongyang Xue Jingqin Xue Baojun Yan Qiyu Yan Taylor Yan Xiongbo Yan Changgen Yang Chengfeng Yang Fengfan Yang Jie Yang Kaiwei Yang Lei Yang Pengfei Yang Xiaoyu Yang Xuhui Yang Yifan Yang Zekun Yang Haifeng Yao Jiaxuan Ye Mei Ye Ziping Ye Frédéric Yermia Jilong Yin Weiqing Yin Xiaohao Yin Zhengyun You Boxiang Yu Chiye Yu Chunxu Yu Hongzhao Yu Peidong Yu Simi Yu Zeyuan Yu Cenxi Yuan Noman Zafar Jilberto Zamora Vitalii Zavadskyi Fanrui Zeng Shan Zeng Tingxuan Zeng Liang Zhan Bin Zhang Feiyang Zhang Han Zhang Hangchang Zhang Haosen Zhang Honghao Zhang Jiawen Zhang Jie Zhang Jingbo Zhang Junwei Zhang Lei Zhang Ping Zhang Qingmin Zhang Rongping Zhang Shiqi Zhang Shuihan Zhang Tao Zhang Xiaomei Zhang Xu Zhang Xuantong Zhang Yibing Zhang Yinhong Zhang Yiyu Zhang Yongpeng Zhang Yuanyuan Zhang Yue Zhang Yumei Zhang Zhenyu Zhang Zhicheng Zhang Zhijian Zhang Jie Zhao Runze Zhao Shujun Zhao Yangheng Zheng Li Zhou Shun Zhou Xiang Zhou Xing Zhou Jingsen Zhu Kangfu Zhu Kejun Zhu Bo Zhuang Honglin Zhuang Jiaheng Zou http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02785v1 2026-06-01T18:50:28Z

Large machine learning models benefit substantially from multimodal inputs that provide a complementary view of the same example. We introduce QUIVER (QUantum-Informed Views for Enhanced Representations, a paradigm that enriches classical data-driven features with a quantum Fisher view: a geometrically motivated, basis-independent summary of higher-order correlations captured by a variational quantum circuit (VQC) trained to perform the same task. Unlike classical feature augmentation, the quantum Fisher information matrix encodes the intrinsic geometry of the learned quantum state manifold. While this feature map, motivated by quantum information theory, is ordinarily non-trivial to model classically, it can surface statistical structure that additional classical data or model capacity finds difficult to learn. This makes the quantum Fisher view a genuinely complementary modality rather than a redundant one. We demonstrate that QUIVER improves standard performance metrics on two benchmark datasets from very different fields: QM9 for predicting molecule properties, and JetClass for predicting jet flavor at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The core contribution, however, is domain-agnostic: the quantum Fisher view can be fused into a broad class of model architectures via targeted modifications to the base architecture, to incorporate information about the quantum geometry of the problem. These results demonstrate that quantum-geometric features, extracted from simulated variational circuits, can deliver measurable value for standard machine learning tasks, well before the advent of fault-tolerant quantum hardware.

2026-06-01T18:50:28Z 9 pages, 1 figure and 2 tables. Accepted as a poster at the AI4Physics Workshop, ICML 2026 (Seoul, South Korea) Aritra Bal Michael Binder Markus Klute Benedikt Maier Michael Spannowsky http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02751v1 2026-06-01T18:18:18Z

Dark matter particles can be accelerated by annihilation processes such as semi-annihilations and $n \to m$ ($n > m$) processes when the dark sector is non-minimally extended. Such boosted dark matter can provide a distinctive signature of a non-minimal dark sector, and its experimental detectability has been explored in a model-independent manner in previous work. In this work, we construct an explicit model of boosted dark matter originating from semi-annihilations. A Dirac fermion is identified as the dark matter candidate, which semi-annihilates into a pair of an anti-dark matter particle and a neutrino. The small neutrino masses are also radiatively generated at the two-loop level. Taking into account the relevant experimental and theoretical constraints, we find that the mass of the mediator needs to be $\mathcal{O}(1)~\mathrm{MeV}$ for the elastic scattering with protons, so that the cross section is enhanced to $\mathcal{O}(10^{-36})~\mathrm{cm}^2$, allowing detection in future experiments such as DUNE and DARWIN.

2026-06-01T18:18:18Z 16 pages, 6 figures, 1 table Motoko Fujiwara Takashi Toma http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02714v1 2026-06-01T18:00:04Z

We present the next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NNLL) collinear resummation of projected $N$-point energy correlators (ENCs) up to $N=6$, matched to fixed-order predictions at NLO, in both electron-positron annihilation and Higgs decay to gluons. The key new ingredient is the two-loop jet function for $N=4,5,6$, which we compute semi-analytically using Integration-by-Parts and differential equations. We further include the leading non-perturbative corrections for ENCs, described by two universal soft matrix elements $\overlineΩ_{1q},\overlineΩ_{1g}$ of order $Λ_{\rm QCD}$, whose evolution is governed by anomalous dimensions for $(N-1)$-point correlators. The matched distributions are compared with parton-shower simulations from Pythia8 and Herwig7, and we study the sensitivity of both the absolute spectra and their ratios to the two-point energy correlator under variations of $α_s$ and $\overlineΩ_{1q,1g}$. Our results show that higher-point projected energy correlators are now under quantitative control at NNLL accuracy, opening the door to future $α_s$ extractions with complementary systematics.

2026-06-01T18:00:04Z 36 pages + appendices, 15 figures Kyle Lee Yibei Li Zhen Xu Xiaoyuan Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02579v1 2026-06-01T17:59:49Z

Muscovite mica is a translucent, layered silicate mineral whose basal cleavage, low radiogenic background, gigayear exposures, and demonstrated track retention over geological timescales make it a compelling target for rare particle searches. In this work, we develop a new framework for detecting heavy composite dark matter using muscovite mica as a paleodetector. We model melt track formation by heavy composite dark matter transiting through mica using a Sedov-Taylor thermal spike formalism, and validate the sub-micron regime with SRIM/TRIM simulations of nuclear recoil cascades, which also calibrate the phonon efficiency governing local energy deposition. We demonstrate a novel readout method using rapid X-ray fluorescence mapping with a copper backing contrast technique, capable of identifying micron-scale damage features in cleaved mica sheets over macroscopic scan areas, and calibrate the minimum detectable track size using laser-ablated defect regions. We present projected sensitivities for opaque and diffuse composite dark matter, including a sub-melt hole-channel detection mode for large composites substantially attenuated by overburden. We also revisit prior dark matter exclusions from etched mica searches, identifying shortcomings that compromise the robustness of these constraints.

2026-06-01T17:59:49Z Yilda Boukhtouchen Joseph Bramante Andrew Buchanan Alexander Hayes Matthew Leybourne Jennika McIntosh Anupam Ray Aaron Shugar http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02557v1 2026-06-01T17:52:08Z

Muon tomography based on multiple Coulomb scattering provides a non-destructive method to image dense and shielded objects using naturally occurring cosmic-ray muons. In the context of nuclear waste characterization, we present the experimental imaging of a 205-L mock waste barrel using a dedicated 1m$^2$ muon scattering tomography test bench. The system employs multiplexed resistive Micromegas detectors, enabling stable and high-precision muon tracking. Monte Carlo simulations are first used to characterize material-dependent scattering signatures and to quantitatively assess identification performance using statistical reconstruction. These simulation-based results are then used to define objective discrimination thresholds, which are subsequently applied to experimental data for the localization and identification of internal anomalies. Using an Angle Statistics Reconstruction algorithm, we achieve a spatial resolution of 10 mm and demonstrate the three-dimensional imaging of an internal structure containing both low- and high-radiation length materials. Material discrimination performance is evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, yielding high identification efficiency for dense metallic inclusions such as lead and steel (AUC $\geq$ 0.96) within acquisition times of a few days, while cavities also exhibit strong contrast. Experimental results show good agreement with detailed Monte Carlo simulations. By establishing a continuous workflow from simulation-based performance characterization to practical application on measured data, this work provides a quantitatively validated framework for muon scattering tomography applied to complex, shielded objects.

2026-06-01T17:52:08Z 12 pages, 15 figures Raphaël Bajou David Attié Héctor Gómez Irakli Mandjavidze Philippe Mas http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02538v1 2026-06-01T17:45:13Z

Recently, a fit to $B \to PP$ decays ($P \in \{π, K, η, η'\}$) was performed (arXiv:2604.19612, "QCD-factorization amplitudes from flavour symmetries: beyond the $SU(3)$ symmetric case''}) using a formalism that combines topological diagrams with QCD factorization, and a good fit was found. We also recently performed such a fit, under the assumption that the $B \to PP$ amplitudes are related by flavour SU(3) symmetry, but we found a very poor fit. The two results therefore disagree with one another. The source of this disagreement is that we applied EWP-tree relations (ETRs). These were derived $\sim 30$ years ago, and relate different topological diagrams or reduced matrix elements, thus reducing the number of unknown parameters in the fit. In their paper, it is asserted that ETRs are invalid, so that analyses that use them are unreliable. We are writing this Comment to explain why this assertion is incorrect. The key point is that ETRs are mathematically rigorous, group theoretically. If SU(3) is unbroken, and the small Wilson coefficients $c_{7,8}$ in the weak effective Hamiltonian are neglected, ETRs follow automatically and are exact. That is, this is a group theory result -- no hadronic calculations are involved. In this Comment, we also point out several weaknesses of their formalism.

2026-06-01T17:45:13Z 8 pages. Comment on arXiv:2604.19612 Bhubanjyoti Bhattacharya David London http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10015v2 2026-06-01T15:42:32Z

We investigate polarization-induced interference, off-shell effects, and gauge cancellations in predictions for high-energy, multi-leg processes with (near) resonant weak bosons. Building on the ``polarized propagator'' paradigm, we carry out our analysis at the level of helicity amplitudes and squared amplitudes, computing polarization interference directly. We introduce analytical decompositions of polarized propagators, valid for covariant and axial gauges, that simplify the organization and evaluation of polarized amplitudes, and make power counting of mass-over-energy factors manifest. We show: (i) For the fully massive case, polarization interference can exceed $\mathcal{O}(Γ_V^2/M_V^2)$ width-over-mass corrections, limiting the applicability of the narrow width and pole approximation at low energies. (ii) At the fully differential level, interference can naturally be larger than squared longitudinal amplitudes but can also vanish when bosons are emitted by unpolarized sources. (iii) When weak bosons decay to massless fermions, the non-interference of polarization after angular integration extends to the off-shell regime but remains approximate due to $V-A$ couplings. Guided by BRST invariance, we propose a simple scheme for grouping together polarizations that reduces gauge ambiguities in predictions for polarized scattering rates and is applicable to the fully massive case. As case studies, we examine polarization interference in $W$(+jets), top quark decay, and neutrino deep-inelastic scattering. For decays of unpolarized top quarks, interference exactly cancels at the totally unintegrated level.

2025-12-10T19:07:01Z 74 pages (incl. appendix and refs), 16 figures (42 image files), 2 tables. Major revisions following new/improved results, simplified proofs Trina Basu Richard Ruiz http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02285v1 2026-06-01T14:07:59Z

We report the first measurement of charged-hadron pseudorapidity ($η$) distributions in oxygen-oxygen (OO) collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.36 TeV. The data were recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2025. Primary charged-hadron yields are measured in the range $|η|$ $\lt$ 2.4 as a function of centrality (the overlap of the two nuclei). The results are compared with previous measurements in lead-lead (PbPb) and xenon-xenon collisions at similar energies, as well as predictions from several Monte Carlo event generators and a hydrodynamic model. The charged-hadron pseudorapidity density in the midrapidity region ($|η|$ $\lt$ 0.5) is $\langle$dN$_{\text{ch}}$/d$η\rangle$ = 41.8 $\pm$ 1.1 (syst) integrated over centrality and 135.0 $\pm$ 4.0 (syst) for the most central (i.e., largest nuclear overlap) events. The hydrodynamic model TRAJECTUM provides the best overall description of the data, particularly in central collisions. The particle density at midrapidity divided by the number of nucleons participating in the interaction in central OO collisions is consistent with that observed in central PbPb collisions at similar collision energy. While the overall energy-scaling behavior observed in other nucleus-nucleus collisions is preserved, the data exhibit deviations from simple participant and system-size scaling, highlighting the role of collision geometry and finite-size effects in light ion collisions.

2026-06-01T14:07:59Z Submitted to Physics Letters B. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIN-25-010 (CMS Public Pages) CMS Collaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02182v1 2026-06-01T12:37:56Z

In this work, we compute the next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) QCD corrections to the process $e^+e^-\to J/ψ+χ_{cJ}$ at B factories within the NRQCD factorization framework. The helicity amplitudes are obtained via asymptotic expansions around $r=0$ and $r=1$, with $r=16m_c^2/s$. Our asymptotic expressions reproduce the exact numerical results with high accuracy across the entire range $0\le r \le 1$, achieving a relative error below $10^{-5}$, which is sufficient for phenomenological applications. Notably, the large logarithmic terms are obtained analytically. We compute the unpolarized cross sections. The $\mathcal{O}(α_s)$ correction is found to be large, while the $\mathcal{O}(α_s^2)$ correction for $χ_{c0}$ production amounts to $33\%$ of the leading-order (LO) cross section, significantly reducing the scale uncertainties. For $χ_{c1}$, the $\mathcal{O}(α_s)$ and $\mathcal{O}(α_s^2)$ corrections correspond to $35\%$ and $-15\%$, respectively. For $χ_{c2}$, the corresponding corrections are $25\%$ and $-38\%$. The large cancellation between the corrections for $χ_{c2}$ brings the NNLO cross section close to the LO prediction. Our prediction for $χ_{c0}$ is consistent with the {\tt Belle} measurement and agrees with the {\tt BaBar} data within $2σ$. We also predict the angular distribution parameters $α^J_θ$, which are independent of nonperturbative inputs. A sharp discrepancy between the theory and the {\tt Belle} measurement is observed for $α^0_θ$, calling for further experimental and theoretical investigations. Moreover, future measurements of the angular distribution parameters for $χ_{c1}$ and $χ_{c2}$ will provide important tests of the theoretical framework.

2026-06-01T12:37:56Z 30 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables Hao-Yang Liu Cong Li Wen-Long Sang http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02148v1 2026-06-01T12:16:14Z

We report on the development, construction, and integration of a remote automation controller \texttt{NA64-DTC} for the so-called ``DESY Table'' motorised platform widely used at CERN East-Area and North-Area experimental installations. The device is based on an ESP32-C3 System-on-Module that interfaces with the table manual control panel via a signal duplication connector. Button presses are emulated through opto-isolated switches, to allow for simultaneous operation with the manual system without modifying the original hardware. A \texttt{HTTP} server running on the controller allows interfacing with the device, enabling experiment-specific integration solutions. \\ The device was successfully commissioned at CERN, exploiting the experimental installations at PS-T9 and SPS-H4 beamlines. This work describes in detail the device technical design and operation, as well as the performance obtained during the commissioning operations. Although initially conceived for the NA64 experiment, the proposed solution can be of interest to all CERN experiments making use of the DESY Table platform, enabling remote and automated operation while reducing manual intervention during beam activities.

2026-06-01T12:16:14Z Version to be submitted to JINST as Technical Report A. Antonov A. Celentano A. Marini L. Marsicano