https://arxiv.org/api/JRfS4eXzBgBjU9LB+pqiGrSx8aU 2026-03-22T10:05:26Z 59527 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18576v1 2026-03-19T07:37:56Z

The Higgs boson decay to massive bottom quarks has the largest branching ratio. The decay is mainly induced by the bottom-quark Yukawa coupling with the decay rate calculated up to $\mathcal{O}(α_s^4)$ assuming the massless final-state bottom quark. The top-quark Yukawa coupling induced contribution starts at $\mathcal{O}(α_s^2)$, and exhibits logarithmic and power enhancements, making the perturbative expansion converge slowly. We present a calculation of such contributions at $\mathcal{O}(α_s^4)$ to the decay into massive bottom quarks in which the squared amplitudes contain two top-quark Yukawa couplings. We find that they increase the decay width, relative to the result up to $\mathcal{O}(α_s^3)$, by $0.4\%$, larger than the experimental precision at future lepton colliders, and reduce the scale dependence significantly down to $0.4\%$.

2026-03-19T07:37:56Z 15 pages, 4 figures Jian Wang Xing Wang Yefan Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18521v1 2026-03-19T06:09:32Z

We report the first observation of the decay $D_s^+ \to π^+π^0π^0η$ in a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 7.33 fb$^{-1}$, collected in $e^+e^-$ collisions by the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies between 4.128 and 4.226 GeV. An unexpectedly large branching fraction $\mathcal{B}( D_s^+ \to a_0(980)^+ f_0(500), a_0(980)^+ \to π^+η, f_0(500)\to π^0π^0) = (0.98 \pm 0.16_{\rm{stat.}} \pm 0.22_{\rm{syst.}})\%$ is measured with a significance exceeding $10σ$, offering new constraints on the internal structure of light scalar mesons. The dominant intermediate process is $D_s^+ \to a_1(1260)^+η, a_1(1260)^+\to ρ(770)^+π^0$ with a branching fraction of $(1.77 \pm 0.21_{\rm stat.} \pm 0.12_{\rm syst.})\%$. The isospin symmetry has been validated to the decays of $a_1(1260)^+\to ρ(770)^0π^+$ and $a_1(1260)^+\to ρ(770)^+π^0$. Moreover, the measured $\mathcal{B}(D_s^+\to π^+π^0π^0η|_{\rm{non}-η^\prime})=(2.97 \pm 0.23_{\rm stat.} \pm 0.14_{\rm sys.})$ reduces the undetected $D_s^+ \to ηX$ decay branching fractions to (0.1 $\pm$ 3.1)\%.

2026-03-19T06:09:32Z BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai C. S. Akondi R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. H. An Y. Bai O. Bakina Y. Ban H. -R. Bao X. L. Bao V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen W. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du S. X. Du X. L. Du Y. Q. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang J. Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng L. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng E. M. Gersabeck A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. Gollub J. B. Gong J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl S. Gramigna M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez J. Y. Han T. T. Han X. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Y. X. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji L. K. Jia X. Q. Jia Z. K. Jia D. Jiang H. B. Jiang P. C. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao L. C. L. Jin S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana X. L. Kang X. S. Kang B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger L. Krümmel Y. Y. Kuang M. Kuessner X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li C. K. Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li H. P. Li Hui Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. L. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat C. C. Lin D. X. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu T. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. P. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. L. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma Y. M. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Malde Q. A. Malik H. X. Mao Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang S. Pacetti X. Pan Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus G. L. Peng H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi M. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi M. H. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S Stansilaus F. Stieler M. Stolte S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian I. Uman E. van der Smagt B. Wang B. Wang Bo Wang C. Wang C. Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang H. J. Wang H. R. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang M. Wang N. Y. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang T. J. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Y. N. Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. W. Wu Z. Wu H. L. Xia L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing D. B. Xiong C. J. Xu G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu M. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan Y. Y. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang Y. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. M. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Z. Y. Yang Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Y. C. Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan J. Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan Shunan Zhang B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang G. Y. Zhang H. Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang Jin Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang Q. Z. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang G. Zhao J. -P. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao L. Zhao M. G. Zhao R. P. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. P. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng W. Q. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. X. Zhu Lin Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang J. H. Zou http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10328v2 2026-03-19T05:31:56Z

This study employs QCD sum rules to predict the masses and residues of spin-$\frac {3}{2} $ doubly heavy baryons including two heavy quarks (c and/or b) and one light quark, specifically focusing on $ Ξ_{cc}^*$, $ Ξ_{bc}^*$, $ Ξ_{bb}^*$, $ Ω_{cc}^*$, $ Ω_{bc}^*$ and $ Ω_{bb}^*$. Our study provides results for the ground state ($1S$), first orbital excitation ($1P$), and the first radial excitation ($2S$), within a consistent theoretical framework. In addition to mass spectra, we provide residue calculations as well. The calculated residues are essential for estimating the decay widths and branching ratios of these baryons at different decay channels. Our analysis incorporates nonperturbative QCD effects through operators up to dimension ten, leading to improved precision in the mass and residue calculations. These predictions offer crucial guidance for ongoing and future experimental searches, particularly in light of the current lack of empirical data for the ground and excited states, and provide a basis for comparison with future experimental data.

2025-08-14T04:05:42Z 17 Pages, 4 Figures and 8 Tables M. Shekari Tousi K. Azizi http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18438v1 2026-03-19T02:56:21Z

We present the first lattice QCD determination of the $Ξ_b \to Ξ$ vector, axial-vector, and tensor form factors, which are relevant for the theory of rare decays including $Ξ_b \to Ξ\ell^+\ell^-$ and $Ξ_b \to Ξγ$. The calculation is performed with 2+1 flavors of domain-wall fermions at three different lattice spacings and pion masses in the range from approximately 430 to 230 MeV. The bottom quark is implemented using an anisotropic clover action. Three-point functions with a wide range of source-sink separations and model averaging are used to extract the ground-state contributions. We fit the dependence of the form factors on the momentum transfer, the pion mass, and the lattice spacing using modified $z$ expansions that account for subthreshold branch cuts, and apply dispersive bounds and asymptotic-behavior constraints to achieve controlled uncertainties in the full semileptonic kinematic region. Using our form factor results, we present Standard-Model predictions for the $Ξ_b^- \to Ξ^- γ$ and $Ξ_b^- \to Ξ^- μ^+μ^-$ branching fractions and two angular observables.

2026-03-19T02:56:21Z 29 pages, 9 figures Callum Farrell Stefan Meinel http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04839v2 2026-03-19T02:36:18Z

We introduce optimal transport (OT) as a physics-based intermediate event representation for weakly supervised anomaly detection. With only $0.5\%$ injection of resonant signals in the LHC Olympics benchmark datasets, the OT-augmented feature set achieves nearly twice the significance improvement of standard high-level observables provided in the benchmark, while end-to-end deep learning on low-level four-momenta struggles in the low-signal regime. The gains persist across signal types and classifiers, underscoring the value of structured representations in machine learning for anomaly detection.

2025-12-04T14:21:50Z 9 pages, 6 figures Tianji Cai Aditya Bhargava Benjamin Nachman http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06500v2 2026-03-18T23:45:10Z

The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment aims to detect rare interactions between dark matter particles and xenon. Although the detector is designed to be the most sensitive to GeV/$c^2$--TeV/$c^2$ Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), it is also capable of measuring low-energy ionization signals down to a single electron that may be produced by scatters of sub-GeV/$c^2$ dark matter. The major challenge in exploiting this sensitivity is to understand and suppress the ionization background in the few-electron regime. We report a characterization of the delayed electron backgrounds following energy depositions in the LZ detector under different detector conditions. In addition, we quantify the probability for photons to be emitted in coincidence with electron emission from the high voltage grids. We then demonstrate that spontaneous grid electron emission can be identified and rejected with a high efficiency using a coincident photon tag, which provides a tool to improve the sensitivity of future dark matter searches.

2025-10-07T22:31:42Z 13 pages, 9 figures D. S. Akerib A. K. Al Musalhi F. Alder B. J. Almquist C. S. Amarasinghe A. Ames T. J. Anderson N. Angelides H. M. Araújo J. E. Armstrong M. Arthurs A. Baker S. Balashov J. Bang J. W. Bargemann E. E. Barillier K. Beattie T. Benson A. Bhatti T. P. Biesiadzinski H. J. Birch E. Bishop G. M. Blockinger B. Boxer C. A. J. Brew P. Brás S. Burdin M. C. Carmona-Benitez M. Carter A. Chawla H. Chen Y. T. Chin N. I. Chott S. Contreras M. V. Converse R. Coronel A. Cottle G. Cox D. Curran C. E. Dahl I. Darlington S. Dave A. David J. Delgaudio S. Dey L. de Viveiros L. Di Felice C. Ding J. E. Y. Dobson E. Druszkiewicz S. Dubey C. L. Dunbar S. R. Eriksen A. Fan N. M. Fearon N. Fieldhouse S. Fiorucci H. Flaecher E. D. Fraser T. M. A. Fruth R. J. Gaitskell A. Geffre J. Genovesi C. Ghag A. Ghosh S. Ghosh R. Gibbons S. Gokhale J. Green M. G. D. van der Grinten J. J. Haiston C. R. Hall T. Hall S. J. Haselschwardt M. A. Hernandez S. A. Hertel G. J. Homenides M. Horn D. Q. Huang D. Hunt E. Jacquet R. S. James K. Jenkins A. C. Kaboth A. C. Kamaha M. K. Kannichankandy D. Khaitan A. Khazov J. Kim Y. D. Kim J. Kingston D. Kodroff E. V. Korolkova H. Kraus S. Kravitz L. Kreczko V. A. Kudryavtsev C. Lawes D. S. Leonard K. T. Lesko C. Levy J. Lin A. Lindote W. H. Lippincott J. Long M. I. Lopes W. Lorenzon C. Lu S. Luitz P. A. Majewski A. Manalaysay R. L. Mannino C. Maupin M. E. McCarthy D. N. McKinsey J. McLaughlin J. B. McLaughlin R. McMonigle B. Mitra E. Mizrachi M. E. Monzani E. Morrison B. J. Mount M. Murdy A. St. J. Murphy H. N. Nelson F. Neves A. Nguyen C. L. O'Brien F. H. O'Shea I. Olcina K. C. Oliver-Mallory J. Orpwood K. Y Oyulmaz K. J. Palladino N. J. Pannifer N. Parveen S. J. Patton B. Penning G. Pereira E. Perry T. Pershing A. Piepke S. S. Poudel Y. Qie J. Reichenbacher C. A. Rhyne G. R. C. Rischbieter E. Ritchey H. S. Riyat R. Rosero T. Rushton D. Rynders S. Saltão D. Santone A. B. M. R. Sazzad R. W. Schnee G. Sehr B. Shafer S. Shaw K. Shi T. Shutt C. Silva G. Sinev J. Siniscalco A. M. Slivar R. Smith V. N. Solovov P. Sorensen J. Soria A. Stevens T. J. Sumner A. Swain M. Szydagis D. R. Tiedt M. Timalsina Z. Tong D. R. Tovey J. Tranter M. Trask K. Trengove M. Tripathi A. Usón A. C. Vaitkus O. Valentino V. Velan A. Wang J. J. Wang Y. Wang L. Weeldreyer T. J. Whitis K. Wild M. Williams J. Winnicki L. Wolf F. L. H. Wolfs S. Woodford D. Woodward C. J. Wright Q. Xia J. Xu Y. Xu M. Yeh D. Yeum W. Zha H. Zhang T. Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04965v3 2026-03-18T21:00:20Z

A hybrid dual-readout calorimeter concept, comprising both electromagnetic and hadronic sections, has recently been proposed to meet the performance requirements of experiments at future e$^{+}$e$^{-}$ colliders. The front compartment consists of a homogeneous electromagnetic calorimeter made of high-density crystals, each coupled to a pair of Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs) providing the simultaneous readout of scintillation and Cherenkov light. To efficiently detect Cherenkov photons in the presence of dominant scintillation signals, an optical filter is placed in front of one of the two SiPMs to suppress photons in the wavelength region corresponding to that of scintillation emission. In this study, PWO, BGO, and BSO crystals with different dimensions were tested to measure their scintillation light yield and decay time, as well as their transmission and emission spectra. A set of $\sim 100~\rm μm$-thick optical filters was also characterized by measuring their transmittance curves. The experimental results were used to model and estimate the expected filter performance in attenuating scintillation light for the various crystals. The performance of each filter was experimentally validated by measuring the crystal light output with and without the filter using a $^{22}$Na radioactive source and a LYSO:Ce crystal, confirming the accuracy of the calculations. The results show that interference filters are unsuitable for this application because their transmittance strongly depends on the photon incidence angle. Conversely, two absorptive long-pass filters with cutoff wavelengths around 590 nm were found to block more than 99% of the scintillation light from PWO crystals, satisfying the calorimeter specifications.

2025-12-04T16:33:45Z JINST 21 P03025 (2026) Andrea Benaglia Flavia Cetorelli Marco Toliman Lucchini Etiennette Auffray Louis Roux Julie Delenne 10.1088/1748-0221/21/03/P03025 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18172v1 2026-03-18T18:13:37Z

Accurate clustering of electromagnetic energy deposits is essential for reconstructing photons and electrons in modern hadron collider experiments, where boosted topologies and pileup cause overlapping showers and ambiguous energy assignment. We present deep learning-based clustering approaches that reconstruct particle energy and position directly from calorimeter readout. The study includes a two-step strategy in which candidate seed windows are identified and then jointly processed via distance-weighted message passing or attention mechanism and a single-step graph transformer, ClusTEX, which performs candidate selection and reconstruction in one inference stage. ClusTEX uses a novel positional encoding scheme that separates local coordinates within the graph from global detector coordinates, enabling efficient, geometry-aware inference. Models are trained on GEANT4 simulations of a simplified (toy) and an ECAL-inspired topology with an explicit $η-φ$ dependence. Performance is evaluated using efficiency, energy and position resolutions and splitting rate - reconstruction of two objects for a single photon. In the toy calorimeter, attention-based interactions improve the reconstruction of overlapping showers relative to both the standard algorithm and distance-driven message passing, while maintaining performance on isolated photons and reducing splitting without multi-pass inference. For boosted $π^0\toγγ$, the attention-based model retains di-photon mass reconstruction capability, where the standard algorithm becomes inefficient. In the ECAL-inspired topology, ClusTEX provides the best overall performance, yielding improved energy resolution and reduced splitting compared to two-step approaches and the standard algorithm. It also remains robust under localized detector failures, showing improved stability and partial recovery of energy in non-responsive channels.

2026-03-18T18:13:37Z Yuliia Maidannyk Fabrice Couderc Julie Malclès Mehmet Özgür Sahin http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18167v1 2026-03-18T18:06:04Z

The meV mass range has emerged as a focal point in axion physics, where advances in theory, cosmology, astrophysics, and experimental techniques converge. Axions in this mass range are theoretically well motivated, can arise in ultraviolet-complete models, and can have significant cosmological impacts as dark matter or dark radiation. In parallel, their efficient production in stellar and supernova environments provides powerful astrophysical probes. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of meV axions across these domains, highlighting both established results and open questions. We discuss the theoretical underpinnings of meV axions, their cosmological and astrophysical signatures, and the diverse experimental strategies -- ranging from helioscopes and haloscopes to quasiparticle systems and large-volume Cherenkov detectors -- that aim to explore this regime. The convergence of these approaches emphasizes the pivotal role of the meV mass range for axion discovery in the coming years, identifying meV axions as a key probe for testing beyond-Standard-Model physics. This review document is the direct outcome of the discussions at the dedicated workshop "The meV Mass Axion Frontier: Challenges and Opportunities", held at Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (IT) on 27--28 October 2025, and organized by the EU funded COST Action "Cosmic WISPers in the Dark Universe: Theory, astrophysics, and experiments" (CA21106, https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA21106). Its aim is to provide an overview of current efforts in meV axion research, their motivations, and the research goals that animate the community involved in this search.

2026-03-18T18:06:04Z (60 pages, 14 figures) Michele Cicoli Francesco D'Eramo Luca Di Luzio Damiano F. G. Fiorillo Maurizio Giannotti Alicia Gomez Diego Guadagnoli Mathieu Kaltschmidt Bradley J. Kavanagh Alessandro Lella Giuseppe Lucente David J. E. Marsh Federico Mescia Alessandro Mirizzi Javier Redondo Nicole Righi Jaime Ruz Ken'ichi Saikawa Elisa Todarello Edoardo Vitagliano Su-Yang Xu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17951v1 2026-03-18T17:25:28Z

The COHERENT collaboration reports the most precise measurement of the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross section to date. This measurement was performed with COHERENT's germanium detector array, Ge-Mini, at the Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. A cumulative exposure of $4.68\times10^{22}$ protons on target yielded a total number of observed counts of $124^{+14}_{-12}$ and a flux-averaged cross section of $1.00 \pm 0.10 \mathrm{(statistical)} \pm 0.10 \mathrm{(systematic)}$ relative to the standard-model expectation of $5.9\times10^{-39} \mathrm{cm}^2$. The well-understood energy and timing distributions of the neutrino source allow for independent measurements of muon- and electron-neutrino scattering rates. This information is used to improve constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions mediated by heavy particles.

2026-03-18T17:25:28Z M. Adhikari M. Ahn D. Amaya Matamoros P. S. Barbeau V. Belov I. Bernardi C. Bock A. Bolozdynya R. Bouabid A. Bracho J. Browning B. Cabrera-Palmer N. Cedarblade-Jones S. Chen A. I. Colón Rivera V. da Silva Y. Efremenko S. R. Elliott A. Erlandson L. Fabris S. Foster A. Galindo-Uribarri E. Granados Vazquez M. P. Green B. Hackett J. Hakenmüller M. Harada M. R. Heath S. Hedges Y. Hino H. Huang W. Huang H. Jeong B. A. Johnson T. Johnson H. Jones A. Khromov D. Kim L. Kong A. Konovalov Y. Koshio E. Kozlova A. Kumpan O. Kyzylova Y. Lee S. M. Lee G. Li L. Li Z. Li J. M. Link J. Liu Q. Liu X. Lu M. Luxnat A. Major D. M. Markoff J. Mattingly H. McLaurin K. McMichael N. Meredith Y. Nakajima F. Nakanishi J. Newby N. Ogoi J. O'Reilly A. Orvedahl D. S. Parno D. Pérez-Loureiro D. Pershey C. G. Prior J. Queen R. Rapp H. Ray O. Razuvaeva D. Reyna D. Rudik J. Runge D. J. Salvat J. Sander K. Scholberg H. Sekiya A. Shakirov G. Simakov J. Skweres W. M. Snow V. Sosnovtsev M. Stringer C. Su T. Subedi B. Suh B. Sur R. Tayloe Y. -T. Tsai E. E. van Nieuwenhuizen C. J. Virtue G. Visser K. Walkup E. M. Ward R. Wendell T. Wongjirad C. Yang Y. Yang J. Yoo Y. Yu A. Zaalishvili Y. Zheng http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18164v3 2026-03-18T15:56:13Z

Charged-hadron identification (PID) is a critical requirement for the physics program of the Circular Electron-Positron Collider (CEPC). The baseline detector relies on ionization measurements from a time projection chamber (TPC), which provides strong PID capability at low momenta but becomes less effective at higher momenta. In this work, we investigate an extended PID strategy that combines dN/dx information from the TPC with time-of-flight (ToF) measurements from a silicon-based outer tracker (OTK) and a timing-upgraded inner tracker (ITK) equipped with AC-LGAD sensors. A unified discriminant is constructed to exploit the complementary sensitivity of ionization and timing observables. The performance is evaluated using simulated $Z \to q\bar{q}$ events, focusing on kaon identification in the presence of dominant pion backgrounds. The combined configuration significantly improves both efficiency and purity over a broad kinematic range, extending PID capability to both sub-GeV and multi-GeV regions. These results highlight the impact of precision timing on tracking detectors and demonstrate a viable path to enhanced PID performance for future lepton colliders.

2025-07-24T08:01:49Z 10 pages, 12 figures. Dian Yu and Houqian Ding share first authorship Dian Yu Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics, School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology State Key Laboratory of Dark Matter Physics, Shanghai, China Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Astroparticule et Cosmologie, F-75013 Paris, France Houqian Ding Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China Yongfeng Zhu Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing, China Kun Liu Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics, School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology State Key Laboratory of Dark Matter Physics, Shanghai, China Ming Qi Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China Yunyun Fan Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing, China http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16530v2 2026-03-18T15:15:05Z

Quantum computers represent a new computational paradigm with steadily improving hardware capabilities. In this article, we present the first study exploring how current quantum computers can be used to classify different neutrino event types observed in neutrino telescopes. We investigate two quantum machine learning approaches, Neural Projected Quantum Kernels (NPQKs) and Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNNs), and find that both achieve classification performance comparable to classical machine learning methods across a wide energy range. By introducing a moment-of-inertia-based encoding scheme and a novel preprocessing approach, we enable efficient and scalable learning with large neutrino astronomy datasets. Tested on both simulators and the IBM Strasbourg quantum processor, the NPQK achieves a testing accuracy near 80%, with robust results above 1 TeV and close agreement between simulation and hardware performance. A simulated QCNN achieves a ~70% accuracy over the same energy range. These results underscore the promise of quantum machine learning for neutrino astronomy, paving the way for future advances as quantum hardware matures.

2025-06-19T18:22:29Z Pablo Rodriguez-Grasa Pavel Zhelnin Carlos A. Argüelles Mikel Sanz http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18984v2 2026-03-18T11:30:58Z

In this paper, we investigate the production of a fully charmed tetraquark state $T_{4c}$ in $pp$ collisions at forward rapidities through the fragmentation mechanism considering the Color Glass Condensate (CGC) formalism and the solution of the running coupling Balitsky-Kovchegov (BK) equation. The contributions of gluon - and charm - initiated processes are taken into account, and the impact of an intrinsic charm component in the proton's wave function is estimated. Predictions for the transverse momentum distribution of the $T_{4c}$ state are presented assuming different rapidities, distinct quantum numbers of the state and center-of-mass energies. Our results indicate that the higher cross-section is associated with the production of a tensor state $T_{4c}(2^{++})$, which is dominated by the gluon-initiated process. In contrast, the production of the axial-vector state $T_{4c}(1^{+-})$ is dominated by the charm-initiated process and is very sensitive to the presence (or not) of an intrinsic charm.

2025-11-24T10:56:22Z 13 pages, 8 figures, 1 table. Improved version published in PRD Francesco G. Celiberto André V. Giannini Victor P. Gonçalves Yuri N. Lima http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13257v2 2026-03-18T11:27:47Z

In this paper we propose the analysis of the heavy quark photoproduction associated with a leading neutron in hadronic collisions at the LHC as an alternative to probe the pion gluon distribution in a kinematical range not covered by previous experiments. We perform an exploratory study of the charm and bottom photoproduction associated with a leading neutron in proton-proton ($pp$) and proton-lead ($pPb$) collisions, and present calculations for the rapidity distributions and cross-sections. Our predictions indicate that experimental studies of these processes are feasible, and that a future measurement of this final state will be useful to constrain the pion gluon distribution at small values of the Bjorken $x$ variable and to improve our understanding of the pion structure.

2025-12-15T12:10:34Z 12 pages, 6 figures, 1 table. Version published in PRD Victor P. Goncalves Juciene T. de Souza Diego Spiering http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17612v1 2026-03-18T11:25:11Z

The inclusive photoproduction of heavy mesons in ultraperipheral $pPb$ and $PbPb$ collisions at the LHC energies is investigated considering the color dipole $S$-matrix formalism and assuming distinct models for the unintegrated gluon distribution, based on different assumptions for the description of the QCD dynamics. In particular, predictions for the $B^0$-meson photoproduction are presented here for the first time. The study of the $D^0$-meson photoproduction is revisited by estimating the impact of the treatment of the heavy charm fragmentation on the predictions and extended for $pPb$ collisions. Moreover, the contribution associated with the $b \rightarrow D^0$ transition is estimated. Our results indicate that a future experimental analysis of the heavy meson photoproduction will provide important constrains on the description of the hadronic structure at high energies.

2026-03-18T11:25:11Z 11 pages, 9 figures Victor P. Goncalves Luana Santana Wolfgang Schäfer