https://arxiv.org/api/JRfS4eXzBgBjU9LB+pqiGrSx8aU 2026-06-13T10:44:48Z 60385 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27049v2 Family-separated seesaw relations of Majorana neutrinos 2026-06-11T03:09:55Z Given the canonical seesaw mechanism as a most natural extension of the standard model in its neutrino sector, we find out a special but brand new solution to the exact seesaw equation: $m^{}_i/M^{}_i = - R^2_{αi}/U^2_{αi}$ for the masses and flavor mixing matrix elements of light and heavy Majorana neutrinos of the $i$-th family (for $i = 1, 2, 3$ and $α= e, μ, τ$). This family-separated seesaw scenario allows us to establish simple relations between the original seesaw parameters and the active degrees of freedom, and thus offers a number of testable predictions in neutrino phenomenology. 2026-05-26T14:02:04Z 14 pages, 2 figures. More discussions and results added Zhi-zhong Xing http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12533v1 Constraining the real scalar singlet extension of the SM 2026-06-10T18:00:04Z The real scalar singlet extension of the standard model provides a minimal framework in which the Higgs sector can realise a strong first-order electroweak phase transition and improve the stability of the electroweak vacuum. We combine the electroweak phase transition and high-scale vacuum stability with current and projected collider probes, including precision Higgs measurements, the Higgs trilinear coupling, EWPO and resonant searches for a heavy singlet-like scalar in $ZZ$ and di-Higgs final states. Focusing on a singlet heavier than the standard model Higgs, we find that there is parameter space compatible with a strong first-order electroweak phase transition for singlet-like scalar masses up to nearly 1 TeV. Deviations in the Higgs self-coupling can be larger than those in the Higgs--$Z$ coupling, making Higgs-potential measurements a key probe. We find that the HL-LHC will test a large fraction of the parameter space, while the FCC will provide ultimate discovery and model-discrimination capabilities. 2026-06-10T18:00:04Z Moritz Bosse Gudrun Hiller Daniel Litim Fabio Maltoni Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf Simone Tentori Guotao Xia http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16492v2 Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders 2026-06-10T16:50:01Z Directly probing light-quark Yukawa couplings and their flavor structure remains a major challenge due to their smallness and overwhelming QCD backgrounds. In this Letter, we propose a theoretical framework to access these couplings at lepton colliders through transverse spin dependent azimuthal modulations in dihadron fragmentation. These modulations arise from the interference between Higgs mediated and standard model amplitudes in $e^-e^+\to q\bar{q}Z$, producing angular structures that are linearly sensitive to the Yukawa couplings $y_q$, in contrast to conventional observables that scale as $y_q^2$. By combining channels with an identified accompanying single hadron, $h^\prime=π^\pm,K^\pm$, and $p/\bar{p}$, this approach cleanly disentangles the up- and down-quark Yukawa contributions, yielding typical limits at the $\mathcal{O}(10^{-4}\sim 10^{-3})$ level and establishing fragmentation dynamics as a novel and complementary probe of the Higgs flavor structure. 2025-12-18T13:00:01Z 6 pages, 3 figures, published version in PRL Phys.Rev.Lett. 136 (2026) 23, 231901 Qing-Hong Cao Xin-Kai Wen Bin Yan Shu-Tao Zhang 10.1103/p5c7-m43d http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21670v2 Effective field theory interpretation of ATLAS measurements involving the Higgs boson, electroweak bosons and the top quark 2026-06-10T15:20:34Z Wilson coefficients in dimension-six effective field theory are constrained in a combined fit to several ATLAS measurements. These inputs probe Higgs-boson processes across multiple production and decay modes, di-Higgs signatures in the $b\bar{b}γγ$ and $b\bar{b}ττ$ final states, $WW$ and $WZ$ diboson signatures, electroweak $Zjj$ final states, high-mass Drell-Yan interactions, and $t \bar t$ events in both resolved and boosted topologies. Precision electroweak observables from LEP, SLD, and ATLAS are also included. A total of 48 parameters, including individual Wilson coefficients in the Warsaw basis and linear combinations of Wilson coefficients, are constrained simultaneously. Constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models and heavy-vector-boson models are also obtained by matching a relevant sub-set of the results with their parameters. This combined fit provides the most comprehensive effective field theory interpretation of experimental data by the ATLAS Collaboration to date. No significant deviations from the Standard Model are observed. 2026-04-23T13:36:10Z 65 pages in total, author list starting page 48, 12 figures, 12 tables, submitted to JHEP. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/STDM-2023-32 ATLAS Collaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12158v1 Hidden-sectors search and probe of discrete symmetries at the REDTOP experiment 2026-06-10T14:45:10Z The $η$ and $η^{\prime}$ mesons are nearly unique in the particle universe since they are nearly Goldstone bosons, and their decay dynamics are strongly constrained. While earlier experiments collected samples of order $\sim 10^{9}$ $η$, the proposed REDTOP (Rare Eta Decays To Observe Physics Beyond the Standard Model) facility targets $\mathcal{O}(10^{14})$ $η$ and $\mathcal{O}(10^{12})$ $η'$, enabling broad searches for physics beyond the Standard Model. In this work, we present studies evaluating REDTOP sensitivity to processes that couple the Standard Model to New Physics through four portals: the Vector (dark photon), the Scalar (Higgs-mixing), the Axion-like, and the Heavy Lepton. In parallel, the proposed statistics allow precise tests of $CP$ and $T$ invariance and lepton universality and improve determinations of the $η/η'$ transition form factors, which are crucial inputs to the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment $(g-2)_μ$. 2026-06-10T14:45:10Z The REDTOP COllaboration http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10150v2 Towards the implementation of a quantum classifier 2026-06-10T14:30:03Z In this work, we investigate the use of a quantum circuit as a binary classification model in the context of quantum machine learning. We call this model, binary quantum classifier. First, we describe fundamental concepts of quantum computing and introduce the computational tool used: Qibo, an open-source framework for efficient quantum simulations and quantum hardware control. Then, we describe how to design a binary quantum classifier for the classification of images and small arrays of variables by showing how to input data in the circuit, defining a quantum circuit model Ansatz with trainable parameters and a loss function, and implementing multiple minimizers. We test our quantum classifier with two data sets. The first one is the MNIST data set which is composed of handwritten digits (reduced to only handwritten zeros and handwritten ones for binary classification). We study the behavior of different minimizers by increasing the number of layers of the Ansatz. The second data set represents two different high energy collisions that can occur at colliders such as LHC (CERN). Due to in-time proton-proton interactions known as pile-up, we distinguish two different data sets: "without pile-up" and "with pile-up". These collisions can be represented by images of size 32x32 or by six high-level variables that we call features. By increasing the size of the training data set and the number of layers of the Ansatz, we search for the best minimizer. Splitting the data set in training set and test set, we compute: ROC curve, AUC score, confusion matrices and test set accuracy. For "with pile-up" images, we compare the results obtained with the quantum classifier with a small convolutional neural network. We conclude that is possible to build a binary quantum classifier with a quantum circuit and we highlight its performances and limitations in comparison with classical technologies. 2026-06-08T20:28:14Z Bachelor's Thesis in Physics, Lorenzo Confalonieri, supervised by Adrián Pérez-Salinas and Stefano Carrazza, Università degli Studi di Milano (July 2021). 55 pages, 28 figures. Code implementations utilize the Qibo framework Lorenzo Confalonieri http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12084v1 Limit on the nuclear Schiff moment of europium-153 2026-06-10T13:47:31Z The Schiff moment of a nucleus is a symmetry-violating nuclear moment that indicates new physics beyond the Standard Model. We place the limit, $|\mathscr{S}({}^{153}$Eu)$| < 1.7 \times 10^{-8}$ $e\,$fm$^3$ (95\% confidence), on the Schiff moment of the $^{153}$Eu nucleus, using nuclear spin resonances in two ensembles of oppositely-polarized $^{153}$Eu$^{3+}$ ions in a Y${}_2$SiO${}_5$ crystal. This measurement using octupolar nuclei in a mm-scale crystal constrains new physics at the TeV energy-scale. 2026-06-10T13:47:31Z Bassam Nima Mingyu Fan Xubo Wang Sen Wang En Fu Zhou Andrew M. Jayich Jiang Ming Yao Lan Cheng Amar Vutha http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12929v2 Dispersive analysis of the $π^+ π^-$ production at the CMD3 experiment and the compatibility with muon pair production measurement by KLOE2 and the pion form factor by JLAB 2026-06-10T13:37:14Z The spectral function of the charged pion form factor was extracted from two data sets. The difference between the two sets is based on the presence or absence of the recent measurement of the $π^+ π^-$ production by CMD-3 . Although the CMD-3 data are largely incompatible with other recent measurements, no excess was found when the data were used for analytical continuation to the spacelike region and compared to JLaB-$π$ experiment. Instead, both data sets provide a spacelike form factor that differs from the expected behavior known from perturbative analyses of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). A precise fit of the spectral functions is provided, either based on he bare form factor and the full $e^+e^-\rightarrow π^+π^-$ as well . Furthermore, the extracted pionic spectral functions were used to obtain the QED running charge. This was then compared with the KLOE-2 measurements. 2026-03-13T12:19:43Z The main purpose of v2 version was to replace wrong figure 1 uploaded by unhappy accident when creating v1. Some cosmetics was made, references added Dimitrios Petrellis Vladimir Sauli http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12002v1 Unexpected large relative strong phase and search for isospin breaking and $CP$ asymmetries in $J/ψ\to K^*(892)\bar K 2026-06-10T12:26:38Z Using a direct scan of 26 energy points near the $J/ψ$ resonance, we perform the first measurement of the relative phase $φ_{γ, 3g}$ between the strong and electromagnetic amplitudes in $J/ψ\to\bar K^0 K^*(892)^0+c.c.$ and $J/ψ\to K^+ K^*(892)^-+c.c.$. Unexpectedly, the phase in the neutral channel is found to be $\sim 150^\circ$, deviating from orthogonality ($90^\circ$) by 4.2$σ$ and from a relative real amplitude (0$^\circ$ or 180$^\circ$) by 10.0$σ$ or 1.6$σ$, respectively. In contrast, the charged channel phase is consistent with $\sim 180^\circ$ within 1$σ$, exhibiting model-dependent behavior. The corresponding branching fractions are consistent with the world averages but achieve better than twofold improvement in precision. The ratios between the branching fractions of $J/ψ\to\bar K^0 K^*(892)^0+c.c.$ and $J/ψ\to K^+ K^*(892)^-+c.c.$ are also measured. After subtracting the electromagnetic contribution, the corresponding strong amplitude ratios obey isospin symmetry within $1.8σ$. A search for direct $CP$ violation yields asymmetries consistent with zero. 2026-06-10T12:26:38Z BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai C. S. Akondi R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. H. An M. S. Anderson Y. Bai O. Bakina H. R. Bao X. L. Bao M. Barbagiovanni V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann D. Cabiati H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen W. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori E. Di Fiore X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong Z. J. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Shaoxu Du X. L. Du Y. Q. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang Jin Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Xu Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Yunong Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. Gollub J. B. Gong J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo H. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez J. Y. Han T. T. Han X. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Y. X. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji L. K. Jia X. Q. Jia D. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao L. C. L. Jin S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana X. L. Kang X. S. Kang B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger L. Krümmel Y. Y. Kuang X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li Chunkai Li Cong Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li H. P. Li Hui Li J. N. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li L. K. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li M. T. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. H. Li Y. B. Li Y. C. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. L. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang Z. Z. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat C. C. Lin C. X. Lin D. X. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu Kun Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu T. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. P. Liu X. T. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Yi Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. L. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. X. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Maity S. Malde Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang I. V. Ovtin S. Pacetti Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus G. L. Peng H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad L. Pöpping F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker K. Ravindran C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan W. R. Ruangyoo N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas M. Schernau K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi Ch. Y. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi M. H. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S. Stansilaus F. Stieler M. Stolte S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun H. Tabaharizato N. T. Tagsinsit C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang Z. H. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian K. Yu. Todyshev I. Uman E. van der Smagt B. Wang Bin Wang Bo Wang C. Wang Chao Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang F. K. Wang H. J. Wang H. R. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang Mi Wang N. Y. Wang P. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Yanning Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Zhi Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei D. J. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner H. R. Wen S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. W. Wu Z. Wu H. L. Xia L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing D. B. Xiong G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan Y. Y. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang X. Y. Yang Y. Yang Y. G. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. M. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Youhua Yang Z. Y. Yang W. J. Yao Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye K. Yi Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Yongchao Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan Jie Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang Gengyuan Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang Han Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang Jin Zhang Jiyuan Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang Q. Z. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang S. N. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Yao Zhang Yu Zhang Yu Zhang Z. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang Zhilong Zhang Ziyang Zhang Ziyu Zhang G. Zhao J. -P. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao Lei Zhao M. G. Zhao R. P. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. P. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng W. Q. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong X. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. X. Zhu Lin Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang M. Zhuge J. H. Zou J. Zu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12493v1 Strong and electromagnetic amplitudes, direct $CP$ and isospin asymmetries in the decays $J/ψ\to K^0_SK^+π^-+c.c.$ 2026-06-10T12:03:35Z Using $e^+e^-$ annihilation data collected at 26 center-of-mass energy points between 3000.00 and $3119.88~\text{MeV}$ with the BESIII detector, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of about $440.7~\text{pb}^{-1}$, we study the cross section lineshape of $e^+e^-\to K_S^0 K^+π^-+c.c.$. The relative phases and magnitudes between $J/ψ$ strong and electromagnetic decay amplitudes are measured to be $(123.7\pm5.3)^\circ;4.31\pm0.22$ or $(-123.1\pm5.2)^\circ;4.38\pm0.22$, with corresponding branching fractions $\mathcal{B}(J/ψ\to K_S^0 K^+π^-+c.c.)=(5.17\pm0.20)$ or $(5.36\pm0.20)\times10^{-3}$. Based on a partial wave analysis, the cross sections of $e^+e^-\to\bar K^0 K^*(892)^0+c.c.$ and $e^+e^-\to K^+ K^*(892)^-+c.c.$ are obtained. For these subprocesses, the relative phases and magnitudes are determined as $(155.2\pm15.5)^{\circ};3.67\pm0.27$ or $(-154.1\pm15.5)^{\circ};3.71\pm0.25$ and $(180.1\pm31.8)^{\circ};25.06\pm2.51$, respectively. The large relative phases deviate from the orthogonality relation expected from experiment and from the assumption of purely real amplitudes by more than $3σ$. The measured branching fractions $\mathcal{B}(J/ψ\to\bar K^0 K^*(892)^0)+c.c.=(4.18\pm0.18)$ or $(4.31\pm0.19)\times10^{-3}$, $\mathcal{B}(J/ψ\to K^+ K^*(892)^-+c.c.)=(7.09\pm0.28)\times10^{-3}$ are all consistent with the world average values, but achieve better than a twofold improvement in precision. The ratios between the branching fractions of $J/ψ\to\bar K^0 K^*(892)^0+c.c.$ and $J/ψ\to\bar K^+ K^*(892)^-+c.c.$ are $\mathcal{R}_{K^*\bar{K}}=0.589\pm0.012$ or $0.612\pm0.013$. After subtracting the electromagnetic contribution, the corresponding strong amplitude ratios are $\mathcal{R}^{3g}_{K^*\bar{K}}=0.884\pm0.050$ or $0.909\pm0.044$, which deviate $2.3$ or $2.1σ$ from the unity. No evidence for direct $CP$ violation is observed. 2026-06-10T12:03:35Z BESIII Collaboration M. Ablikim M. N. Achasov P. Adlarson X. C. Ai C. S. Akondi R. Aliberti A. Amoroso Q. An Y. H. An M. S. Anderson Y. Bai O. Bakina H. R. Bao X. L. Bao M. Barbagiovanni V. Batozskaya K. Begzsuren N. Berger M. Berlowski M. B. Bertani D. Bettoni F. Bianchi E. Bianco A. Bortone I. Boyko R. A. Briere A. Brueggemann D. Cabiati H. Cai M. H. Cai X. Cai A. Calcaterra G. F. Cao N. Cao S. A. Cetin X. Y. Chai J. F. Chang T. T. Chang G. R. Che Y. Z. Che C. H. Chen Chao Chen G. Chen H. S. Chen H. Y. Chen M. L. Chen S. J. Chen S. M. Chen T. Chen W. Chen X. R. Chen X. T. Chen X. Y. Chen Y. B. Chen Y. Q. Chen Z. K. Chen J. Cheng L. N. Cheng S. K. Choi X. Chu G. Cibinetto F. Cossio J. Cottee-Meldrum H. L. Dai J. P. Dai X. C. Dai A. Dbeyssi R. E. de Boer D. Dedovich C. Q. Deng Z. Y. Deng A. Denig I. Denisenko M. Destefanis F. De Mori E. Di Fiore X. X. Ding Y. Ding Y. X. Ding J. Dong L. Y. Dong M. Y. Dong X. Dong Z. J. Dong M. C. Du S. X. Du Shaoxu Du X. L. Du Y. Q. Du Y. Y. Duan Z. H. Duan P. Egorov G. F. Fan J. J. Fan Y. H. Fan J. Fang Jin Fang S. S. Fang W. X. Fang Y. Q. Fang L. Fava F. Feldbauer G. Felici C. Q. Feng J. H. Feng Q. X. Feng Y. T. Feng M. Fritsch C. D. Fu J. L. Fu Y. W. Fu H. Gao Xu Gao Y. Gao Y. N. Gao Y. Y. Gao Yunong Gao Z. Gao S. Garbolino I. Garzia L. Ge P. T. Ge Z. W. Ge C. Geng A. Gilman K. Goetzen J. Gollub J. B. Gong J. D. Gong L. Gong W. X. Gong W. Gradl M. Greco M. D. Gu M. H. Gu C. Y. Guan A. Q. Guo H. Guo J. N. Guo L. B. Guo M. J. Guo R. P. Guo X. Guo Y. P. Guo Z. Guo A. Guskov J. Gutierrez J. Y. Han T. T. Han X. Han F. Hanisch K. D. Hao X. Q. Hao F. A. Harris C. Z. He K. K. He K. L. He F. H. Heinsius C. H. Heinz Y. K. Heng C. Herold P. C. Hong G. Y. Hou X. T. Hou Y. R. Hou Z. L. Hou H. M. Hu J. F. Hu Q. P. Hu S. L. Hu T. Hu Y. Hu Y. X. Hu Z. M. Hu G. S. Huang K. X. Huang L. Q. Huang P. Huang X. T. Huang Y. P. Huang Y. S. Huang T. Hussain N. Hüsken N. in der Wiesche J. Jackson Q. Ji Q. P. Ji W. Ji X. B. Ji X. L. Ji Y. Y. Ji L. K. Jia X. Q. Jia D. Jiang S. J. Jiang X. S. Jiang Y. Jiang J. B. Jiao J. K. Jiao Z. Jiao L. C. L. Jin S. Jin Y. Jin M. Q. Jing X. M. Jing T. Johansson S. Kabana X. L. Kang X. S. Kang B. C. Ke V. Khachatryan A. Khoukaz O. B. Kolcu B. Kopf L. Kröger L. Krümmel Y. Y. Kuang X. Kui N. Kumar A. Kupsc W. Kühn Q. Lan W. N. Lan T. T. Lei M. Lellmann T. Lenz C. Li C. H. Li C. K. Li Chunkai Li Cong Li D. M. Li F. Li G. Li H. B. Li H. J. Li H. L. Li H. N. Li H. P. Li Hui Li J. N. Li J. S. Li J. W. Li K. Li K. L. Li L. J. Li L. K. Li Lei Li M. H. Li M. R. Li M. T. Li P. L. Li P. R. Li Q. M. Li Q. X. Li R. Li S. Li S. X. Li S. Y. Li Shanshan Li T. Li T. Y. Li W. D. Li W. G. Li X. Li X. H. Li X. K. Li X. L. Li X. Y. Li X. Z. Li Y. Li Y. H. Li Y. B. Li Y. C. Li Y. G. Li Y. P. Li Z. H. Li Z. J. Li Z. L. Li Z. X. Li Z. Y. Li C. Liang H. Liang Y. F. Liang Y. T. Liang Z. Z. Liang G. R. Liao L. B. Liao M. H. Liao Y. P. Liao J. Libby A. Limphirat C. C. Lin C. X. Lin D. X. Lin T. Lin B. J. Liu B. X. Liu C. Liu C. X. Liu F. Liu F. H. Liu Feng Liu G. M. Liu H. Liu H. B. Liu H. M. Liu Huihui Liu J. B. Liu J. J. Liu K. Liu K. Y. Liu Ke Liu Kun Liu L. Liu L. C. Liu Lu Liu M. H. Liu P. L. Liu Q. Liu S. B. Liu T. Liu W. M. Liu W. T. Liu X. Liu X. K. Liu X. L. Liu X. P. Liu X. T. Liu X. Y. Liu Y. Liu Y. B. Liu Yi Liu Z. A. Liu Z. D. Liu Z. L. Liu Z. Q. Liu Z. X. Liu Z. Y. Liu X. C. Lou H. J. Lu J. G. Lu X. L. Lu Y. Lu Y. H. Lu Y. P. Lu Z. H. Lu C. L. Luo J. R. Luo J. S. Luo M. X. Luo T. Luo X. L. Luo Z. Y. Lv X. R. Lyu Y. F. Lyu Y. H. Lyu F. C. Ma H. L. Ma Heng Ma J. L. Ma L. L. Ma L. R. Ma Q. M. Ma R. Q. Ma R. Y. Ma T. Ma X. T. Ma X. Y. Ma F. E. Maas I. MacKay M. Maggiora S. Maity S. Malde Y. J. Mao Z. P. Mao S. Marcello A. Marshall F. M. Melendi Y. H. Meng Z. X. Meng G. Mezzadri H. Miao T. J. Min R. E. Mitchell X. H. Mo B. Moses N. Yu. Muchnoi J. Muskalla Y. Nefedov F. Nerling H. Neuwirth Z. Ning S. Nisar Q. L. Niu W. D. Niu Y. Niu C. Normand S. L. Olsen Q. Ouyang I. V. Ovtin S. Pacetti Y. Pan A. Pathak Y. P. Pei M. Pelizaeus G. L. Peng H. P. Peng X. J. Peng Y. Y. Peng K. Peters K. Petridis J. L. Ping R. G. Ping S. Plura V. Prasad L. Pöpping F. Z. Qi H. R. Qi S. Qian W. B. Qian C. F. Qiao J. H. Qiao J. J. Qin J. L. Qin L. Q. Qin L. Y. Qin P. B. Qin X. P. Qin X. S. Qin Z. H. Qin J. F. Qiu Z. H. Qu J. Rademacker K. Ravindran C. F. Redmer A. Rivetti M. Rolo G. Rong S. S. Rong F. Rosini Ch. Rosner M. Q. Ruan W. R. Ruangyoo N. Salone A. Sarantsev Y. Schelhaas M. Schernau K. Schoenning M. Scodeggio W. Shan X. Y. Shan Z. J. Shang J. F. Shangguan L. G. Shao M. Shao C. P. Shen H. F. Shen W. H. Shen X. Y. Shen B. A. Shi Ch. Y. Shi H. Shi J. L. Shi J. Y. Shi M. H. Shi S. Y. Shi X. Shi H. L. Song J. J. Song M. H. Song T. Z. Song W. M. Song Y. X. Song Zirong Song S. Sosio S. Spataro S. Stansilaus F. Stieler M. Stolte S. S Su G. B. Sun G. X. Sun H. Sun H. K. Sun J. F. Sun K. Sun L. Sun R. Sun S. S. Sun T. Sun W. Y. Sun Y. C. Sun Y. H. Sun Y. J. Sun Y. Z. Sun Z. Q. Sun Z. T. Sun H. Tabaharizato N. T. Tagsinsit C. J. Tang G. Y. Tang J. Tang J. J. Tang L. F. Tang Y. A. Tang Z. H. Tang L. Y. Tao M. Tat J. X. Teng J. Y. Tian W. H. Tian Y. Tian Z. F. Tian K. Yu. Todyshev I. Uman E. van der Smagt B. Wang Bin Wang Bo Wang C. Wang Chao Wang Cong Wang D. Y. Wang F. K. Wang H. J. Wang H. R. Wang J. Wang J. J. Wang J. P. Wang K. Wang L. L. Wang L. W. Wang M. Wang Mi Wang N. Y. Wang P. Wang S. Wang Shun Wang T. Wang W. Wang W. P. Wang X. F. Wang X. L. Wang X. N. Wang Xin Wang Y. Wang Y. D. Wang Y. F. Wang Y. H. Wang Y. J. Wang Y. L. Wang Y. N. Wang Yanning Wang Yaqian Wang Yi Wang Yuan Wang Z. Wang Z. L. Wang Z. Q. Wang Z. Y. Wang Zhi Wang Ziyi Wang D. Wei D. H. Wei D. J. Wei H. R. Wei F. Weidner H. R. Wen S. P. Wen U. Wiedner G. Wilkinson M. Wolke J. F. Wu L. H. Wu L. J. Wu Lianjie Wu S. G. Wu S. M. Wu X. W. Wu Z. Wu H. L. Xia L. Xia B. H. Xiang D. Xiao G. Y. Xiao H. Xiao Y. L. Xiao Z. J. Xiao C. Xie K. J. Xie Y. Xie Y. G. Xie Y. H. Xie Z. P. Xie T. Y. Xing D. B. Xiong G. F. Xu H. Y. Xu Q. J. Xu Q. N. Xu T. D. Xu X. P. Xu Y. Xu Y. C. Xu Z. S. Xu F. Yan L. Yan W. B. Yan W. C. Yan W. H. Yan W. P. Yan X. Q. Yan Y. Y. Yan H. J. Yang H. L. Yang H. X. Yang J. H. Yang R. J. Yang X. Y. Yang Y. Yang Y. G. Yang Y. H. Yang Y. M. Yang Y. Q. Yang Y. Z. Yang Youhua Yang Z. Y. Yang W. J. Yao Z. P. Yao M. Ye M. H. Ye Z. J. Ye K. Yi Junhao Yin Z. Y. You B. X. Yu C. X. Yu G. Yu J. S. Yu L. W. Yu T. Yu X. D. Yu Y. C. Yu Yongchao Yu C. Z. Yuan H. Yuan J. Yuan Jie Yuan L. Yuan M. K. Yuan S. H. Yuan Y. Yuan C. X. Yue Ying Yue A. A. Zafar F. R. Zeng S. H. Zeng X. Zeng Y. J. Zeng Yujie Zeng Y. C. Zhai Y. H. Zhan B. L. Zhang B. X. Zhang D. H. Zhang G. Y. Zhang Gengyuan Zhang H. Zhang H. C. Zhang H. H. Zhang H. Q. Zhang H. R. Zhang H. Y. Zhang Han Zhang J. Zhang J. J. Zhang J. L. Zhang J. Q. Zhang J. S. Zhang J. W. Zhang J. X. Zhang J. Y. Zhang J. Z. Zhang Jianyu Zhang Jin Zhang Jiyuan Zhang L. M. Zhang Lei Zhang N. Zhang P. Zhang Q. Zhang Q. Y. Zhang Q. Z. Zhang R. Y. Zhang S. H. Zhang S. N. Zhang Shulei Zhang X. M. Zhang X. Y. Zhang Y. T. Zhang Y. H. Zhang Y. P. Zhang Yao Zhang Yu Zhang Yu Zhang Z. Zhang Z. D. Zhang Z. H. Zhang Z. L. Zhang Z. X. Zhang Z. Y. Zhang Zh. Zh. Zhang Zhilong Zhang Ziyang Zhang Ziyu Zhang G. Zhao J. -P. Zhao J. Y. Zhao J. Z. Zhao L. Zhao Lei Zhao M. G. Zhao R. P. Zhao S. J. Zhao Y. B. Zhao Y. L. Zhao Y. P. Zhao Y. X. Zhao Z. G. Zhao A. Zhemchugov B. Zheng B. M. Zheng J. P. Zheng W. J. Zheng W. Q. Zheng X. R. Zheng Y. H. Zheng B. Zhong C. Zhong X. Zhong H. Zhou J. Q. Zhou S. Zhou X. Zhou X. K. Zhou X. R. Zhou X. Y. Zhou Y. X. Zhou Y. Z. Zhou A. N. Zhu J. Zhu K. Zhu K. J. Zhu K. S. Zhu L. X. Zhu Lin Zhu S. H. Zhu T. J. Zhu W. D. Zhu W. J. Zhu W. Z. Zhu Y. C. Zhu Z. A. Zhu X. Y. Zhuang M. Zhuge J. H. Zou J. Zu http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11574v2 SemiCharmTag: a tool for Semileptonic Charm tagging 2026-06-10T10:15:17Z A method for selecting and/or rejecting leptons from charm semileptonic decays based on the tagging of the secondary vertex using a hadron track is introduced. The method is developed for dimuon Drell-Yan measurements in LHCb using full simulations in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV. We focus on the invariant mass range between 2.9 and 5 GeV/$c^2$ with single muon transverse momentum larger than 1 GeV/$c$. A novel strategy is detailed for background rejection, achieving an improvement of the signal over background of a factor $\sim 4$ at an efficiency of 81% while maintaining the Drell-Yan kinematic distributions largely unbiased except at the acceptance edges. Moreover, a second approach is presented for the construction of unbiased background-pure samples of single muons from charm decays, achieving a charm efficiency of 21.4% at a Drell-Yan efficiency of 1.1%. 2026-04-13T14:52:52Z 21 pages (figures and references included), 10 figures Carolina Arata Imanol Corredoira Alisha Lightbody Michael Winn http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11808v1 Nonexistence of hidden-charm pentaquarks in $J/ψ$ photoproduction 2026-06-10T08:43:16Z We investigate $J/ψ$ photoproduction off the proton, $γp \to J/ψp$, to elucidate the nonexistence of hidden-charm pentaquark signals reported by the GlueX and CLAS12 experiments. Within a coupled-channel rescattering mechanism, we employ the transition amplitudes from a previous coupled-channel analysis that dynamically generates the $P_{c\bar{c}}$ states. The kernel amplitudes for the transition to the $J/ψN$ channel include both $t$-channel heavy-meson exchange and $u$-channel heavy-baryon exchange. We find that the rescattering contributions from the $\bar{D}^{(*)}Σ_c$ channels -- indispensable for the formation of the $P_{c\bar{c}}$ resonances -- are about one order of magnitude smaller than those from $\bar{D}^{(*)}Λ_c$, since $g_{\bar{D}^{(*)}NΣ_c}$ is roughly five times smaller than $g_{\bar{D}^{(*)}NΛ_c}$. Since the $P_{c\bar{c}}$ resonances couple to the $J/ψN$ channel predominantly through the $\bar{D}^{(*)}Σ_c$ intermediate states, their suppression prevents the pentaquark signal from appearing in photoproduction. With only a single parameter controlling the overall normalization, the present work describes the GlueX and CLAS12 cross sections well. These results suggest that the null result from photoproduction need not be in conflict with the pentaquark signals observed by the LHCb Collaboration. 2026-06-10T08:43:16Z 10 pages, 7 figures Samson Clymton Sang-Ho Kim Hyun-Chul Kim http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01991v2 Search for massive, long-lived particles in events with displaced vertices and displaced muons in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV with the ATLAS experiment 2026-06-10T08:30:03Z A search is presented for massive long-lived particles in events featuring at least one displaced vertex and at least one displaced muon, using proton-proton collision data collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider from 2022 to 2024 at a centre-of-mass energy of 13.6 TeV. The data sample corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 164 fb$^{-1}$. The analysis targets scenarios in which long-lived particles decay inside the ATLAS inner detector, resulting in a topology of at least one massive, displaced vertex (DV) with multiple associated tracks, and at least one muon with a large transverse impact parameter relative to the primary interaction point. The muon is not required to be associated with the DV. Two signal regions are defined by the transverse distance of the reconstructed DV from the interaction point. Background contributions are estimated by using fully data-driven techniques. No significant excess above the expected background is observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the visible cross-section and on the production cross-sections of several benchmark models of $R$-parity-violating supersymmetry. 2026-03-02T15:43:22Z 43 pages in total, author list starting page 26, 8 figures, 2 tables, Published by Phys. Lett. B. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/EXOT-2024-21/ Phys. Lett. B 878 (2026) 140509 ATLAS Collaboration 10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140509 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20830v2 Probing the axion-electron coupling at cavity experiments 2026-06-10T07:06:21Z Axion dark matter induces electromagnetic radiation in conductors through nearly perpetual oscillations of electrons, driven by axion-electron interactions through the so-called chiral magnetic effect. It therefore provides a complementary probe of the axion-electron coupling $g_{ae}$ beyond the conventional axion-photon coupling $g_{a γ}$ in cavities. We show that existing axion cavity experiments can constrain the coupling to $g_{ae}\lesssim 10^{-5}$ over the scanned axion mass ranges, $1\,μ\, {\rm eV}\lesssim m_a\lesssim 20\,μ\,{\rm eV}$. Although we find that the radiation due to $g_{ae}$ at the copper cavity surface of electric conductivity $σ$ is suppressed by $m_a^2/σ^2\sim 10^{-20}$, compared to the radiation inside the cavity by the axion-photon conversion due to $g_{aγ}$, a sensitivity of about $10^{-9}$ could be achieved for $g_{ae}$ over a wider range of $m_a$, including values higher than those previously probed, if copper walls are replaced with carbon-based conductors. 2025-07-28T13:35:46Z 18 pages, 3 figures: v2 minor changes Deog Ki Hong Sang Hui Im Jinsu Kim TaeHun Kim SungWoo Youn http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04962v2 ALP and $Z^\prime$ boson at the Electron-Ion collider 2026-06-10T06:01:14Z We study the sensitivity of the upcoming electron-ion (EIC) collider to purely electrophilic new physics in the GeV mass range. Within an effective field theory framework, we consider two different scenarios: an axion-like particle (ALP) and a new heavy neutral vector gauge boson $Z^\prime $, each couples to electrons only. We analyze electron-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}= 141$ GeV with an integrated luminosity of $100~{\rm fb}^{-1}$, focusing primarily on the tri-electron final state. Additionally, loop-induced ALP-photon couplings driven photon final states are also explored. Incorporating realistic detector effects and systematic uncertainties, we obtain projected exclusion limits on the relevant cross-sections and couplings. We find that the results from EIC can significantly extend the sensitivity to electrophilic axion-like particles and $Z^\prime $ bosons in regions of parameter space that remain weakly constrained by existing experiments. 2026-01-08T14:07:48Z 36 pages, 21 figures, 8 tables, version accepted for publication in PRD Amit Adhikary Dilip Kumar Ghosh Sk Jeesun Sourov Roy 10.1103/jkry-pcpk