https://arxiv.org/api/XP4l/eO689SxafC15Bde9oY/Fcc2026-06-10T10:33:02Z6036512015http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06787v2The structure of multi-axion solutions to the strong CP problem2026-06-02T14:12:28ZA broad experimental program is targeting the QCD axion band predicted by single-axion solutions to the strong CP problem. Multi-axion theories provide a well-motivated departure from this canonical picture, since additional states generically modify the mass-photon-coupling relation. We investigate the general structure of multi-axion solutions to the strong CP problem and study the different qualitative mass-coupling patterns that arise, including axions to the right of the QCD band, axions in the experimentally accessible region to its left, and scenarios in which the QCD axion band itself is displaced. This general treatment reveals a broad set of phenomenological possibilities that are not captured by more restrictive assumptions. In particular, we identify the structure of Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking and the relative alignment between the QCD and electromagnetic anomalies as key ingredients determining the location of the axions in parameter space. Combining these ingredients, we derive a general sum rule for $N$-axion systems that incorporates both general PQ breaking and non-universal anomaly coefficients. We apply the framework to the two-axion system and to general multi-axion setups, identifying UV-complete theories in which the different phenomenological regimes arise naturally. Our results motivate an extended axion search program and have implications for our understanding of fundamental physics and the ultraviolet completion of the Standard Model.2026-05-07T18:00:05Z20 pages + appendices, 3 figures and 2 table; v2 new theory landscape figure and summary table added, references updatedMario Fernández NavarroMarta F. ZamoroMarko PesutXavier Ponce Díazhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11149v3The High W Challenge: Robust Neutrino Energy Estimators for LArTPCs2026-06-02T13:35:31ZAccurate determination of the neutrino energy is central to precision oscillation measurements. In this work, we introduce the W$^2$-based estimator, a new neutrino energy estimator based on the measurement of the final-state hadronic invariant mass. This estimator is particularly designed to be employed in liquid-argon time-projection chambers exposed to broadband beams that span the challenging transition region between shallow inelastic scattering and deep inelastic scattering. The performance of the W$^2$-based estimator is compared to four other commonly used estimators. The impact of the estimator choice is evaluated by performing measurements of $δ_{CP}$ and $Δm^2_{23}$ in a toy long-baseline oscillation analysis. We find that the W$^2$-based estimator shows the smallest bias as a function of true neutrino energy and it is particularly stable against the mismodelling of lepton scattering angle and momentum, missing energy, hadronic invariant mass and final state interactions. However, studies of the resolution of each estimator as a function of true neutrino energy show this is somewhat offset by worse energy resolution when perfect modeling of these quantities is assumed. This estimator is valid for events with at least one proton and any number of pions; an inclusive channel that complements the strength of more exclusive methods that optimize the energy resolution. By providing a detailed analysis of the strengths, weaknesses and domain of applicability of each estimator, this work informs the combined use of energy estimators in any future LArTPC-based oscillation analysis.2025-11-14T10:27:25ZChristopher ThorpeElena Gramellinihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03510v1Analysis of the $C\!P$ structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV2026-06-02T11:28:11ZThis paper presents a measurement of the charge-parity ($C\!P$) structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson (H) and tau leptons, using proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 62.4 fb$^{1}$. Angular correlations between the decay products of tau leptons produced in H $\to$ $ττ$ decays are exploited to constrain the effective $C\!P$ mixing angle $α^{\mathrm{H}ττ}$, which parameterizes the admixture of scalar and pseudoscalar couplings. The mixing angle is measured to be $α^{\mathrm{H}ττ}$ = (36$^{+33}_{-30}$)$^\circ$, compared with an expected value of (0 $\pm$ 19)$^\circ$ under the standard model hypothesis. When combined with the previous CMS measurement using data collected at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$, the mixing angle is determined to be (7 $\pm$ 16)$^\circ$, with an expected value of (0 $\pm$ 14)$^\circ$. This result represents the most precise measurement by CMS of the $C\!P$ nature of the Higgs boson coupling to tau leptons, with an expected precision that is the best achieved by any experiment to date.2026-06-02T11:28:11ZSubmitted to the Journal of High Energy Physics. All figures and tables can be found at http://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-25-012 (CMS Public Pages) CMS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17291v2Ultralight Dark Matter Detection with a Ferromagnet Lattice2026-06-02T11:22:32ZA levitated ferromagnet provides an exceptionally sensitive probe of ultralight dark matter (ULDM) through measuring weak magnetic-like field signals. We propose a ferromagnet lattice magnetometer that coherently combines multiple levitated ferromagnets to enhance effective sensitivity. By replacing a single ferromagnet with a lattice, we increase the total polarized spin while preserving the intrinsic dynamical response of each constituent ferromagnet. We show that magnetic dipole-dipole interactions within the lattice can be dynamically suppressed through a high-frequency magnetic field, rendering the system effectively noninteracting, at the cost of only a moderate reduction in signal amplitude due to the distinct renormalization of linear and quadratic spin responses. We analyze the noise properties of the lattice and demonstrate that collective readout leads to favorable scaling with the number of ferromagnets. Interpreted in terms of axion-electron, dark photon, and axion-photon couplings, our results yield projected sensitivities that significantly exceed existing single-ferromagnet implementations. In particular, for axion-photon interactions, we find a nontrivial lattice-induced enhancement of the signal itself, leading to sensitivities that surpass existing constraints over a broad mass range.2026-02-19T11:56:15Z5 pages, 2 figuresDongyi YangXiao YangChenxi SunJianwei Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03466v1On the Charged Fragments Tagging in the ATLAS Detector during the 2025 Oxygen Campaign2026-06-02T10:45:49ZDuring the Summer of 2025 the LHC collided protons with oxygen, oxygen with oxygen and neon with neon. The ATLAS experiment recorded these data with its Forward Proton detectors (AFP) inserted on both: the proton and ion sides. This allows access to many interesting studies with scattered fragments being tagged. A few analysis ideas are presented followed by preliminary studies of what could be visible in the AFP.2026-06-02T10:45:49Zin proceedings of Epiphany 2026 conferenceWeronika SobienMaciej Trzebinskihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03443v1Constraints on long-range neutrino interactions from a variety of $U(1)^\prime$ symmetries using atmospheric neutrinos at IceCube DeepCore2026-06-02T10:27:59ZNeutrino oscillation experiments provide a unique probe to search for the physics beyond the Standard Model. In this work, we search for a broad class of anomaly-free flavor-dependent $U(1)^\prime$ symmetries using atmospheric neutrino data for the first time. Gauging these $U(1)^\prime$ symmetries give rise to ultra-light vector gauge bosons mediating long-range interactions (LRI) of neutrinos. These new interactions are sourced by the matter present in local and distant Universe, which can affect oscillations of neutrinos passing through the Earth. We use 8 years of high-purity $ν_μ$ charged-current neutrino events from IceCube DeepCore to search for these new interactions. We find no evidence for such new interactions in the data sample and place stringent constraints on the corresponding LRI potentials. These results are also translated as the bounds on the coupling strength and mass of mediator over their wide ranges for a plethora of $U(1)^\prime$ symmetries.2026-06-02T10:27:59Z16 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables, and 4 appendices. Comments are welcomeGopal GargJ KrishnamoorthiAnil KumarSanjib Kumar Agarwallahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03222v1Search for electroweak scale dijet resonances in pile-up collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector2026-06-02T06:31:31ZA search for dijet resonances in the mass range of 100-250 GeV is presented using proton-proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. Conventional searches for hadronic resonances in the sub-TeV regime are heavily constrained by high jet trigger thresholds required to manage the overwhelming rate of Standard Model multijet background processes described by quantum chromodynamics. To overcome this limitation, this analysis uses a novel strategy that separately reconstructs multiple proton-proton interactions per bunch crossing, known as pile-up collisions. The dataset was collected by the ATLAS experiment using single-electron and single-muon triggers in 2016-2018 corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.30 pb$^{-1}$, which represents the effective luminosity of pile-up collisions recorded alongside triggered events. This constitutes the first application of pile-up collisions to probe low dijet mass scales. No significant excess is observed above the background expectation and exclusion limits are set for a generic Gaussian model and a simplified dark matter model featuring an axial-vector mediator with coupling to quarks.2026-06-02T06:31:31Z42 pages in total, author list starting page 25, 5 figures, 1 tables, submitted to Eur. Phys. J. C. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/EXOT-2022-32/ ATLAS Collaborationhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22433v2Cumulative proton production in $pd$ collisions2026-06-02T06:05:41ZThe model of backward proton production in the exclusive reaction $pd \to ppn$ at proton beam momenta up to several GeV/c is constructed on the basis of Feynman diagrams for one- and two-step amplitudes. The latter include nucleon and $Δ(1232)$ resonance intermediate scattering states with propagators reduced to eikonal form using the generalized eikonal approximation. The model calculations are compared with available experimental data on the energy spectra of protons at backward polar angles in the deuteron rest frame. It is shown that inclusion of two-step amplitudes significantly increases the production of backward protons with energies above $\sim$ 50 MeV, thereby significantly improving the agreement with experiment. The remaining theoretical problem related to the description of the off-shell behavior of the elementary amplitudes of the $NN \to NN$ and $NN \leftrightarrow NΔ$ transitions is discussed. Partial discrepancies between different sets of experimental data do not allow for conclusion that exotic effects, such as proton interactions with density fluctuations and/or $6q$ clusters in the deuteron, are present.2025-09-26T14:51:47Z35 pages, 16 figures, discussion extended, conclusions unchanged, version accepted in Phys. Rev. CA. B. Larionovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01233v2Probing Quantum Entanglement in $τ^+τ^-$ Pairs via the $ππ$ Channel at STCF2026-06-02T05:41:41ZQuantum entanglement and Bell-inequality violation in $τ^+τ^-$ pairs provide a sensitive probe of quantum correlations in high-energy interactions. We present a feasibility study of $e^+e^- \to τ^+τ^-$ at the proposed Super Tau-Charm Facility based on full Monte Carlo simulation at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ GeV, focusing on the $ππ$ channel ($τ^\pm \to π^\pmν$), which offers the maximal spin-analyzing power $|κ| = 1$ and the simplest final-state topology for validating the quantum-tomography framework. We establish a consistency chain from the tree-level QED prediction through truth-level and detector-level reconstruction, yielding a reconstructed concurrence of $0.279 \pm 0.007$ with the good-solution approach. A complementary full-simulation study of the $ρρ$ channel is also briefly reported. These results demonstrate that the STCF can provide a competitive platform for precision studies of quantum correlations in $τ$-lepton pairs.2026-05-02T04:10:09Z6 pages, 2 figures. Contribution to the proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Future Tau-Charm Facilities in hosted by Huangshan University, in Huangshan, China, in Nov. 23 - 27, 2025Xiaokang LiChentao BaoHai ChenMingyi LiuDayong Wang10.1142/S0217751X26450028http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03174v1Nuclear Recoil Migdal Effect in Liquid Xenon Dark Matter Experiments2026-06-02T05:30:52ZThe Migdal effect predicts that a nuclear recoil can be accompanied by detectable atomic ionization or excitation signals, even at the low energies expected from interactions of sub-GeV dark matter particles with atomic nuclei. Liquid xenon-based dark matter experiments have projected substantial sensitivity gains to light dark matter based on this effect, underscoring the importance of its direct characterization in xenon. In this Letter, we draw on our theoretical and experimental studies of nuclear recoil Migdal interactions to discuss their predicted characteristics and corresponding observable signatures in liquid xenon detectors. We examine the challenges of directly observing Migdal signals using neutron-induced xenon recoils and outline possible measurement strategies and necessary background mitigation measures to allow a definitive confirmation of the Migdal effect in liquid xenon.2026-06-02T05:30:52Z4 pages, 3 figuresJingke XuJeonghwa KimDuncan AdamsBrian G. LenardoWalter Hugh LippincottRouven Essighttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20330v3Precision Measurement of $D_{s}^{*+}$-$D_{s}^{+}$ Mass Difference2026-06-02T04:10:50ZWe measure the mass difference between $D_{s}^{*+}$ and $D_{s}^{+}$, $Δm_s$, using the decay chain $D_{s}^{*+} \to D_{s}^{+}(\to K^{+} K^{-} π^{+})π^{0}$, utilizing $e^+e^-$ annihilation data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.19 fb$^{-1}$ collected at a center-of-mass energy of 4.178 GeV with the BESIII detector. The measured value of $Δm_s = [144\,201.9 \pm 44.2({\rm stat.}) \pm 29.9({\rm syst.}) \pm 15.0({\rm PDG})]$ keV/$c^2$ is about seven times more precise than the current Particle Data Group average, where the last uncertainty is from the Particle Data Group average of the $D^{*+} - D^{+}$ mass difference.2025-10-23T08:28:21Z BESIII CollaborationM. AblikimM. N. AchasovP. AdlarsonX. C. AiR. AlibertiA. AmorosoQ. AnY. BaiO. BakinaY. BanH. -R. BaoV. BatozskayaK. BegzsurenN. BergerM. BerlowskiM. B. BertaniD. BettoniF. BianchiE. BiancoA. BortoneI. BoykoR. A. BriereA. BrueggemannH. CaiM. H. CaiX. CaiA. CalcaterraG. F. CaoN. CaoS. A. CetinX. Y. ChaiJ. F. ChangT. T. ChangG. R. CheY. Z. CheC. H. ChenChao ChenG. ChenH. S. ChenH. Y. ChenM. L. ChenS. J. ChenS. M. ChenT. ChenX. R. ChenX. T. ChenX. Y. ChenY. B. ChenY. Q. ChenZ. K. ChenJ. C. ChengL. N. ChengS. K. ChoiX. ChuG. CibinettoF. CossioJ. Cottee-MeldrumH. L. DaiJ. P. DaiX. C. DaiA. DbeyssiR. E. de BoerD. DedovichC. Q. DengZ. Y. DengA. DenigI. DenisenkoM. DestefanisF. De MoriX. X. DingY. DingY. X. DingJ. DongL. Y. DongM. Y. DongX. DongM. C. DuS. X. DuS. X. DuX. L. DuY. Y. DuanZ. H. DuanP. EgorovG. F. FanJ. J. FanY. H. FanJ. FangJ. FangS. S. FangW. X. FangY. Q. FangL. FavaF. FeldbauerG. FeliciC. Q. FengJ. H. FengL. FengQ. X. FengY. T. FengM. FritschC. D. FuJ. L. FuY. W. FuH. GaoY. GaoY. N. GaoY. N. GaoY. Y. GaoZ. GaoS. GarbolinoI. GarziaL. GeP. T. GeZ. W. GeC. GengE. M. GersabeckA. GilmanK. GoetzenJ. D. GongL. GongW. X. GongW. GradlS. GramignaM. GrecoM. D. GuM. H. GuC. Y. GuanA. Q. GuoJ. N. GuoL. B. GuoM. J. GuoR. P. GuoX. GuoY. P. GuoA. GuskovJ. GutierrezT. T. HanF. HanischK. D. HaoX. Q. HaoF. A. HarrisC. Z. HeK. L. HeF. H. HeinsiusC. H. HeinzY. K. HengC. HeroldP. C. HongG. Y. HouX. T. HouY. R. HouZ. L. HouH. M. HuJ. F. HuQ. P. HuS. L. HuT. HuY. HuZ. M. HuG. S. HuangK. X. HuangL. Q. HuangP. HuangX. T. HuangY. P. HuangY. S. HuangT. HussainN. HüskenN. in der WiescheJ. JacksonQ. JiQ. P. JiW. JiX. B. JiX. L. JiX. Q. JiaZ. K. JiaD. JiangH. B. JiangP. C. JiangS. J. JiangX. S. JiangY. JiangJ. B. JiaoJ. K. JiaoZ. JiaoS. JinY. JinM. Q. JingX. M. JingT. JohanssonS. KabanaN. Kalantar-NayestanakiX. L. KangX. S. KangM. KavatsyukB. C. KeV. KhachatryanA. KhoukazO. B. KolcuB. KopfL. KrögerM. KuessnerX. KuiN. KumarA. KupscW. KühnQ. LanW. N. LanT. T. LeiM. LellmannT. LenzC. LiC. LiC. H. LiC. K. LiD. M. LiF. LiG. LiH. B. LiH. J. LiH. L. LiH. N. LiHui LiJ. R. LiJ. S. LiJ. W. LiK. LiK. L. LiL. J. LiLei LiM. H. LiM. R. LiP. L. LiP. R. LiQ. M. LiQ. X. LiR. LiS. X. LiShanshan LiT. LiT. Y. LiW. D. LiW. G. LiX. LiX. H. LiX. K. LiX. L. LiX. Y. LiX. Z. LiY. LiY. G. LiY. P. LiZ. H. LiZ. J. LiZ. X. LiZ. Y. LiC. LiangH. LiangY. F. LiangY. T. LiangG. R. LiaoL. B. LiaoM. H. LiaoY. P. LiaoJ. LibbyA. LimphiratD. X. LinL. Q. LinT. LinB. J. LiuB. X. LiuC. X. LiuF. LiuF. H. LiuFeng LiuG. M. LiuH. LiuH. B. LiuH. M. LiuHuihui LiuJ. B. LiuJ. J. LiuK. LiuK. LiuK. Y. LiuKe LiuL. LiuL. C. LiuLu LiuM. H. LiuP. L. LiuQ. LiuS. B. LiuW. M. LiuW. T. LiuX. LiuX. K. LiuX. L. LiuX. Y. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. B. LiuZ. A. LiuZ. D. LiuZ. Q. LiuZ. Y. LiuX. C. LouH. J. LuJ. G. LuX. L. LuY. LuY. H. LuY. P. LuZ. H. LuC. L. LuoJ. R. LuoJ. S. LuoM. X. LuoT. LuoX. L. LuoZ. Y. LvX. R. LyuY. F. LyuY. H. LyuF. C. MaH. L. MaHeng MaJ. L. MaL. L. MaL. R. MaQ. M. MaR. Q. MaR. Y. MaT. MaX. T. MaX. Y. MaY. M. MaF. E. MaasI. MacKayM. MaggioraS. MaldeQ. A. MalikH. X. MaoY. J. MaoZ. P. MaoS. MarcelloA. MarshallF. M. MelendiY. H. MengZ. X. MengG. MezzadriH. MiaoT. J. MinR. E. MitchellX. H. MoB. MosesN. Yu. MuchnoiJ. MuskallaY. NefedovF. NerlingH. NeuwirthZ. NingS. NisarQ. L. NiuW. D. NiuY. NiuC. NormandS. L. OlsenQ. OuyangS. PacettiX. PanY. PanA. PathakY. P. PeiM. PelizaeusH. P. PengX. J. PengY. Y. PengK. PetersK. PetridisJ. L. PingR. G. PingS. PluraV. PrasadF. Z. QiH. R. QiM. QiS. QianW. B. QianC. F. QiaoJ. H. QiaoJ. J. QinJ. L. QinL. Q. QinL. Y. QinP. B. QinX. P. QinX. S. QinZ. H. QinJ. F. QiuZ. H. QuJ. RademackerC. F. RedmerA. RivettiM. RoloG. RongS. S. RongF. RosiniCh. RosnerM. Q. RuanN. SaloneA. SarantsevY. SchelhaasK. SchoenningM. ScodeggioW. ShanX. Y. ShanZ. J. ShangJ. F. ShangguanL. G. ShaoM. ShaoC. P. ShenH. F. ShenW. H. ShenX. Y. ShenB. A. ShiH. ShiJ. L. ShiJ. Y. ShiS. Y. ShiX. ShiH. L. SongJ. J. SongM. H. SongT. Z. SongW. M. SongY. X. SongZirong SongS. SosioS. SpataroS. StansilausF. StielerS. S SuG. B. SunG. X. SunH. SunH. K. SunJ. F. SunK. SunL. SunR. SunS. S. SunT. SunW. Y. SunY. C. SunY. H. SunY. J. SunY. Z. SunZ. Q. SunZ. T. SunC. J. TangG. Y. TangJ. TangJ. J. TangL. F. TangY. A. TangL. Y. TaoM. TatJ. X. TengJ. Y. TianW. H. TianY. TianZ. F. TianI. UmanB. WangB. WangBo WangC. WangC. WangCong WangD. Y. WangH. J. WangJ. WangJ. J. WangJ. P. WangK. WangL. L. WangL. W. WangM. WangM. WangN. Y. WangS. WangShun WangT. WangT. J. WangW. WangW. P. WangX. WangX. F. WangX. L. WangX. N. WangXin WangY. WangY. D. WangY. F. WangY. H. WangY. J. WangY. L. WangY. N. WangY. N. WangYaqian WangYi WangYuan WangZ. WangZ. WangZ. L. WangZ. Q. WangZ. Y. WangZiyi WangD. WeiD. H. WeiH. R. WeiF. WeidnerS. P. WenU. WiednerG. WilkinsonM. WolkeJ. F. WuL. H. WuL. J. WuLianjie WuS. G. WuS. M. WuX. WuY. J. WuZ. WuL. XiaB. H. XiangD. XiaoG. Y. XiaoH. XiaoY. L. XiaoZ. J. XiaoC. XieK. J. XieY. XieY. G. XieY. H. XieZ. P. XieT. Y. XingC. J. XuG. F. XuH. Y. XuM. XuQ. J. XuQ. N. XuT. D. XuX. P. XuY. XuY. C. XuZ. S. XuF. YanL. YanW. B. YanW. C. YanW. H. YanW. P. YanX. Q. YanH. J. YangH. L. YangH. X. YangJ. H. YangR. J. YangY. YangY. H. YangY. Q. YangY. Z. YangZ. P. YaoM. YeM. H. YeZ. J. YeJunhao YinZ. Y. YouB. X. YuC. X. YuG. YuJ. S. YuL. W. YuT. YuX. D. YuY. C. YuY. C. YuC. Z. YuanH. YuanJ. YuanJ. YuanL. YuanM. K. YuanS. H. YuanY. YuanC. X. YueYing YueA. A. ZafarF. R. ZengS. H. ZengX. ZengYujie ZengY. J. ZengY. C. ZhaiY. H. ZhanShunan ZhangB. L. ZhangB. X. ZhangD. H. ZhangG. Y. ZhangG. Y. ZhangH. ZhangH. ZhangH. C. ZhangH. H. ZhangH. Q. ZhangH. R. ZhangH. Y. ZhangJ. ZhangJ. J. ZhangJ. L. ZhangJ. Q. ZhangJ. S. ZhangJ. W. ZhangJ. X. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Z. ZhangJianyu ZhangL. M. ZhangLei ZhangN. ZhangP. ZhangQ. ZhangQ. Y. ZhangR. Y. ZhangS. H. ZhangShulei ZhangX. M. ZhangX. Y. ZhangY. ZhangY. ZhangY. T. ZhangY. H. ZhangY. P. ZhangZ. D. ZhangZ. H. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. L. ZhangZ. X. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. Z. ZhangZh. Zh. ZhangG. ZhaoJ. Y. ZhaoJ. Z. ZhaoL. ZhaoL. ZhaoM. G. ZhaoS. J. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoY. L. ZhaoY. X. ZhaoZ. G. ZhaoA. ZhemchugovB. ZhengB. M. ZhengJ. P. ZhengW. J. ZhengX. R. ZhengY. H. ZhengB. ZhongC. ZhongH. ZhouJ. Q. ZhouS. ZhouX. ZhouX. K. ZhouX. R. ZhouX. Y. ZhouY. X. ZhouY. Z. ZhouA. N. ZhuJ. ZhuK. ZhuK. J. ZhuK. S. ZhuL. ZhuL. X. ZhuS. H. ZhuT. J. ZhuW. D. ZhuW. J. ZhuW. Z. ZhuY. C. ZhuZ. A. ZhuX. Y. ZhuangJ. H. ZouJ. Zu10.1016/j.scib.2026.04.059http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03042v1Chiral Quark Soliton Model And Nucleon Parton Distribution Functions2026-06-02T02:26:06ZThe chiral quark soliton model (CQSM) is an effective quark model of baryons maximally taking account of the most important feature of low-energy QCD, i.e., the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking of the QCD vacuum and the associated appearance of Nambu--Goldstone pions. It shares many common features with the famous Skyrme model in that the baryons are viewed as rotating hedgehog objects in both models. Despite many similarities, it turned out that the CQSM can give more realistic predictions on most baryon observables. Above all, a decisive advantage of the CQSM over the Skyrme-like models is that it can handle non-local quark--quark correlations in baryons, which is absolutely impossible within the framework of effective meson theories. This feature is decisively important for making theoretical predictions on the quark distribution functions inside the nucleon, which are defined as nucleon matrix elements of bilinear quark operators with light-cone separation. In the present paper, we try to elucidate why and how the CQSM can give successful predictions for a variety of types of nucleon quark distribution functions, especially for the flavor asymmetry of the unpolarized and longitudinally polarized sea-quark (anti-quark) distribution functions in the nucleon.2026-06-02T02:26:06Z40 pages, 17 figures, Invited contribution to the Special Issue of Symmetry, titled "Chiral Quark Models and Their Applications"Symmetry 18 (2026) 892Masashi Wakamatsu10.3390/sym18060892http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25835v2Embedded underwater front-end electronics for the 3-inch photomultipliers in the JUNO experiment2026-06-01T20:46:00ZThe Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is a 20-kton liquid scintillator-based, low-radioactivity, multi-purpose neutrino detector located 693 meters (1800 m.w.e.) underground in the Guangdong province, China. To detect scintillation light produced in the target, the detector is equipped with 17,612 20-inch photomultipliers (PMTs), forming the Large PMT system (LPMT). In addition, 25,600 3-inch photomultipliers (the Small Photomultiplier System or SPMT) are deployed in the gaps between the LPMTs.
This paper presents the design and performance of the underwater front-end electronics developed for the SPMT system. It details the individual electronics boards and their key components, the inter-board interfaces, the system-level design, and the firmware architecture that supports data acquisition and control. It also outlines mechanical and thermal integration, board validation procedures, and system performance metrics. The readout chain includes digitization of 128 PMT channels per unit, synchronized time-stamping, charge measurement, event packaging, and bandwidth management. Comprehensive validation confirms the system's readiness to meet JUNO's stringent physics goals. The underwater electronics achieve noise levels as low as 0.04 photoelectrons with minimal crosstalk (below 0.4%) and a bandwidth of 57 MB/s, ensuring reliable single photo-electron detection and operation under high-rate conditions. The SPMT system has now been fully integrated and installed in JUNO. Its commissioning and physics performance will be reported in a future publication.2026-04-28T16:41:34ZSubmitted to Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. ACédric CernaMiao HeXiaoshan JiangJuan Pedro Ochoa-RicouxFrédéric PerrotAngel AbuslemeThomas AdamFengpeng AnCostas AndreopoulosGiuseppe AndronicoJoão Pedro Athayde Marcondes de AndréNikolay AnfimovVito AntonelliTatiana AntoshkinaDidier AugusteNikita BalashovAndrea BarresiDavide BasilicoEric BaussanMarco BerettaAntonio BergnoliNikita BessonovDaniel BickLukas BiegerSvetlana BiktemerovaThilo BirkenfeldSimon BlythManuel BoehlesAnastasia BolshakovaMathieu BongrandClément BordereauMatteo BorghesiDominique BretonAugusto BrigattiRiccardo BrugneraRiccardo BrunoAntonio BudanoJose BustoMarcel BüchnerAnatael CabreraBarbara CaccianigaHao CaiXiao CaiYi-zhou CaiStéphane CallierAntonio CammiAugustin CampenyGuofu CaoJun CaoYaoqi CaoRossella CarusoCédric CernaVanessa CerroneJinfan ChangYun ChangTim CharisseChao ChenHaotian ChenJiahui ChenJian ChenJing ChenJunyou ChenPingping ChenShaomin ChenShiqiang ChenYixue ChenYu ChenZe ChenZhangming ChenZhiyuan ChenJie ChengYaping ChengYu Chin ChengAlexander ChepurnovAlexey ChetverikovDavide ChiesaPietro ChimentiZiliang ChuArtem ChukanovGérard ClaverieCatia ClementiBarbara ClerbauxClaudio ColettaChenyang CuiLuis Delgadillo FrancoZiyan DengXiaoyu DingXuefeng DingYayun DingSergey DmitrievskyDmitry DolzhikovChuanshi DongHaojie DongJianmeng DongEvgeny DoroshkevichMarcos DracosFrédéric DruilloleRan DuShuxian DuKatherine DugasStefano DusiniHongyue DuyangJessica EckAndrea FabbriUlrike FahrendholzLei FanLiangqianjin FanJian FangWenxing FangElia Stanescu FarillaDmitry FedoseevQichun FengDaniela FetzerMarcellin FotzéAmélie FournierAaron FreegardYing FuFeng GaoAlberto GarfagniniArsenii GavrikovDiwash GhimireMarco GiammarchiNunzio GiudiceMaxim GoncharGuanda GongGuanghua GongYuri GornushkinMarco GrassiMaxim GromovVasily GromovMinhao GuXiaofei GuYu GuMengyun GuanYuduo GuanNunzio GuardoneRosa Maria GuizzettiCong GuoWanlei GuoHajar HacineCaren HagnerHechong HanYang HanChuanhui HaoVidhya Thara HariharanMiao HeWei HeXinhai HeZiou HeTobias HeinzPatrick HellmuthYuekun HengRafael HerreraYuenKeung HorShaojing HouFatima HouriaYee HsiungBei-Zhen HuJun HuTao HuGuihong HuangJinhao HuangJunlin HuangJunting HuangKaixuan HuangShengheng HuangTao HuangXin HuangXingtao HuangYongbo HuangJiaqi HuiLei HuoCédric HussLeonard ImbertAra IoannisianAdrienne JacobiArshak JafarBeatrice JelminiIgnacio JeriaXiangpan JiXiaolu JiJunji JiaCailian JiangChengbo JiangGuangzheng JiangJunjie JiangXiaoshan JiangXiaozhao JiangYijian JiangYixuan JiangXiaoping JingCécile JolletLiam JonesNarine KazarianAmina KhatunKhanchai KhosonthongkeeDenis KorablevKonstantin KouzakovAlexey KrasnoperovSergey KuleshovSindhujha KumaranNikolay KutovskiyLoïc LabitTobias LachenmaierHaojing LaiCecilia LandiniLorenzo LastrucciSébastien LeblancVictor LebrinMatthieu LecocqRuiting LeiRupert LeitnerPetr LenskiiDemin LiFei LiGaosong LiJiajun LiMeiou LiMin LiNan LiRuhui LiRui LiShanfeng LiShuo LiTeng LiWeidong LiXiaonan LiYichen LiYifan LiYingke LiYufeng LiZhaohan LiZhibing LiZi-Ming LiAn-An LiangJiajun LiaoMinghua LiaoYilin LiaoAyut LimphiratBo-Chun LinGuey-Lin LinShengxin LinTao LinXingyi LinJiajie LingXin LingIvano LippiCaimei LiuFang LiuHaidong LiuHongbang LiuHongjuan LiuJianglai LiuJiaxi LiuJinchang LiuKainan LiuMin LiuQian LiuShenghui LiuShulin LiuXiming LiuXuewei LiuYankai LiuYiqi LiuZhipeng LiuZhuo LiuLorenzo LoiAlexey LokhovPaolo LombardiKai LooSelma Conforti Di LorenzoHaoqi LuJunguang LuMeishu LuShuxiang LuXianguo LuBayarto LubsandorzhievSultim LubsandorzhievLivia LudhovaArslan LukanovFengjiao LuoGuang LuoJianyi LuoShu LuoWuming LuoXiaojie LuoVladimir LyashukBangzheng MaBing MaQiumei MaSi MaWing Yan MaXiaoyan MaXubo MaJihane MaalmiJingyu MaiMarco MalabarbaYury MalyshkinRoberto Carlos MandujanoFabio MantovaniStefano M. MariAgnese MartiniJohann MartynMatthias MayerDavit MayilyanYue MengAnselmo MeregagliaLino MiramontiMarta Colomer MollaMichele MontuschiIwan Morton-BlakeXiangyi MuLakshmi MurgodMassimiliano NastasiDmitry V. NaumovElena NaumovaIgor NemchenokElisabeth NeuerburgAlexey NikolaevFeipeng NingZhe NingYujie NiuHiroshi NunokawaLothar OberauerJuan Pedro Ochoa-RicouxSebastian OlivaresAlexander OlshevskiyDomizia OrestanoFausto OrticaRainer OthegravenYifei PanAlessandro PaoloniGeorge ParkerYatian PeiLuca PelicciAnguo PengYu PengZhaoyuan PengElisa PercalliWilly PerrinFrédéric PerrotFabrizio PetrucciOliver PilarczykArtyom PopovPascal PoussotEzio PrevitaliFazhi QiMing QiSen QianXiaohui QianZhonghua QinShoukang QiuManhao QuZhenning QuGioacchino RanucciReem RasheedThomas RaymondAlessandra ReAbdel RebiiMariia RedchukBin RenYuhan RenCristobal Morales RevecoBarbara RicciMariam RifaiMathieu RocheNarongkiat RodphaiFernanda de Faria RodriguesAldo RomaniBedřich RoskovecPeter RudakovArseniy RybnikovAndrey SadovskyAnut SangkaUjwal SanthoshUtane SawangwitMichaela ScheverCédric SchwabKonstantin SchweizerAlexandr SelyuninAndrea SerafiniMariangela SettimoJunyu ShaoAnurag SharmaVladislav SharovHangyu ShiJingyan ShiYuan ShiHexi ShiYike ShuYuhan ShuShe ShuaiVitaly ShutovAndrey SidorenkovRandhir SinghApeksha SinghalChiara SirignanoJaruchit SiripakMonica SistiMikhail SmirnovOleg SmirnovThiago Sogo-BezerraSergey SokolovJulanan SongwadhanaAlbert SotnikovAchim StahlLuca StancoKonstantin StankevichHans SteigerJochen SteinmannTobias SterrMatthias Raphael StockVirginia StratiMikhail StrizhAlexander StudenikinAoqi SuJun SuGuangbao SunMingxia SunXilei SunYongzhao SunZhengyang SunNarumon SuwonjandeeFedor ŠimkovicChristophe De La TailleAkira TakenakaXiaohan TanHaozhong TangJian TangJingzhe TangQuan TangXiao TangYuxin TianIgor TkachevTomas TmejMarco Danilo Claudio TorriAndrea TriossiGiancarlo TroniWladyslaw TrzaskaAndrei TsaregorodtsevYu-Chen TungCristina TuveNikita UshakovCarlo VenettacciGiuseppe VerdeMaxim VialkovBenoit ViaudVit VorobelDmitriy VoroninLucia VotanoPablo WalkerCaishen WangChung-Hsiang WangEn WangHanwen WangJiabin WangJun WangLi WangMeng WangMeng WangMingyuan WangRuiguang WangSibo WangTianhong WangWei WangWenshuai WangWenyuan WangXi WangYangfu WangYaoguang WangYi WangYifang WangYuyi WangZhe WangZheng WangZhimin WangApimook WatcharangkoolJunya WeiJushang WeiWei WeiWei WeiYuehuan WeiZhengbao WeiLiangjian WenJun WengRosmarie WirthBi WuChengxin WuQun WuYinhui WuZhaoxiang WuZhi WuMichael WurmJacques WurtzDongmei XiaShishen XianZiqian XiangFei XiaoPengfei XiaoTianying XiaoXiang XiaoWei-Jun XieXiaochuan XieYuguang XieZhizhong XingBenda XuCheng XuChuang XuDonglian XuFanrong XuJiayang XuJilei XuJinghuan XuMeihang XuShiwen XuXunjie XuDongyang XueJingqin XueBaojun YanQiyu YanTaylor YanXiongbo YanChanggen YangChengfeng YangFengfan YangJie YangKaiwei YangLei YangPengfei YangXiaoyu YangXuhui YangYifan YangZekun YangHaifeng YaoJiaxuan YeMei YeZiping YeFrédéric YermiaJilong YinWeiqing YinXiaohao YinZhengyun YouBoxiang YuChiye YuChunxu YuHongzhao YuPeidong YuSimi YuZeyuan YuCenxi YuanNoman ZafarJilberto ZamoraVitalii ZavadskyiFanrui ZengShan ZengTingxuan ZengLiang ZhanBin ZhangFeiyang ZhangHan ZhangHangchang ZhangHaosen ZhangHonghao ZhangJiawen ZhangJie ZhangJingbo ZhangJunwei ZhangLei ZhangPing ZhangQingmin ZhangRongping ZhangShiqi ZhangShuihan ZhangTao ZhangXiaomei ZhangXu ZhangXuantong ZhangYibing ZhangYinhong ZhangYiyu ZhangYongpeng ZhangYuanyuan ZhangYue ZhangYumei ZhangZhenyu ZhangZhicheng ZhangZhijian ZhangJie ZhaoRunze ZhaoShujun ZhaoYangheng ZhengLi ZhouShun ZhouXiang ZhouXing ZhouJingsen ZhuKangfu ZhuKejun ZhuBo ZhuangHonglin ZhuangJiaheng Zouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02785v1QUIVER: Quantum-Informed Views for Enhanced Representations in Large ML Models2026-06-01T18:50:28ZLarge machine learning models benefit substantially from multimodal inputs that provide a complementary view of the same example. We introduce QUIVER (QUantum-Informed Views for Enhanced Representations, a paradigm that enriches classical data-driven features with a quantum Fisher view: a geometrically motivated, basis-independent summary of higher-order correlations captured by a variational quantum circuit (VQC) trained to perform the same task. Unlike classical feature augmentation, the quantum Fisher information matrix encodes the intrinsic geometry of the learned quantum state manifold. While this feature map, motivated by quantum information theory, is ordinarily non-trivial to model classically, it can surface statistical structure that additional classical data or model capacity finds difficult to learn. This makes the quantum Fisher view a genuinely complementary modality rather than a redundant one. We demonstrate that QUIVER improves standard performance metrics on two benchmark datasets from very different fields: QM9 for predicting molecule properties, and JetClass for predicting jet flavor at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The core contribution, however, is domain-agnostic: the quantum Fisher view can be fused into a broad class of model architectures via targeted modifications to the base architecture, to incorporate information about the quantum geometry of the problem. These results demonstrate that quantum-geometric features, extracted from simulated variational circuits, can deliver measurable value for standard machine learning tasks, well before the advent of fault-tolerant quantum hardware.2026-06-01T18:50:28Z9 pages, 1 figure and 2 tables. Accepted as a poster at the AI4Physics Workshop, ICML 2026 (Seoul, South Korea)Aritra BalMichael BinderMarkus KluteBenedikt MaierMichael Spannowskyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02751v1Boosted dark matter via semi-annihilation in a radiative neutrino mass model2026-06-01T18:18:18ZDark matter particles can be accelerated by annihilation processes such as semi-annihilations and $n \to m$ ($n > m$) processes when the dark sector is non-minimally extended. Such boosted dark matter can provide a distinctive signature of a non-minimal dark sector, and its experimental detectability has been explored in a model-independent manner in previous work. In this work, we construct an explicit model of boosted dark matter originating from semi-annihilations. A Dirac fermion is identified as the dark matter candidate, which semi-annihilates into a pair of an anti-dark matter particle and a neutrino. The small neutrino masses are also radiatively generated at the two-loop level. Taking into account the relevant experimental and theoretical constraints, we find that the mass of the mediator needs to be $\mathcal{O}(1)~\mathrm{MeV}$ for the elastic scattering with protons, so that the cross section is enhanced to $\mathcal{O}(10^{-36})~\mathrm{cm}^2$, allowing detection in future experiments such as DUNE and DARWIN.2026-06-01T18:18:18Z16 pages, 6 figures, 1 tableMotoko FujiwaraTakashi Toma