https://arxiv.org/api/PhzROLUkov4BVdl4n65FH+kGBNA2026-07-17T20:52:42Z60734015http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15214v1Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections to pion (kaon)-induced exclusive Drell-Yan process2026-07-16T17:18:00ZThe high-energy pion and kaon beams proposed for future experiments at J-PARC offer a unique opportunity to investigate exclusive Drell-Yan processes induced by pions or kaons, which correspond to inverse deeply virtual meson production with $M=π,K$. To facilitate precise comparisons between theoretical predictions and forthcoming experimental data, we calculate the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) QCD corrections to the processes $π^- p\to γ^*(\to l^+l^-) + n$ and $K^- p\to γ^*(\to l^+l^-) + Λ$. Our calculations are performed within the generalized parton distribution (GPD) factorization framework, accurate to leading twist in the generalized Bjorken limit ($Q^2\gg |t|,\,Λ_{\rm QCD}^2$). We find that the NNLO QCD corrections are substantial and positive; therefore, their inclusion is imperative for reliable theoretical predictions in confrontation with future experiments.2026-07-16T17:18:00Z10 pages, 1 table, 7 figuresYu JiaBernard PireQin-Tao SongGuang TangZhe-Yu Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09140v2Can a Nonstandard Invisible Pair Mimic the Michel Distribution?2026-07-16T15:09:00ZWe ask whether a measured Michel distribution, apparently in excellent agreement with the Standard Model interpretation of the $\ell_i \to \ell_j ν\barν$ decay, could instead arise from a different invisible sector. Within a general low-energy effective field theory, we analyze lepton decays $\ell_i \to \ell_j + X\bar X$ for electrically neutral, color-singlet, mutually conjugate invisible pairs $X\bar X$ of spin up to $2$, allowing (pseudo)scalar, (axial)vector, and antisymmetric tensor interactions in the lepton current, focusing on the massless limit relevant for exact degeneracies. We formulate a criterion for indistinguishability based on the full set of measurable differential distributions. Under these assumptions, besides the obvious spin $1/2$ case, there is a unique nontrivial solution: a massless complex scalar pair coupled through a purely left-handed vector current exactly reproduces the standard Michel pattern, including its extensions to daughter-lepton polarization and radiative channels. All other cases studied here are distinguishable, in particular because higher-spin invisible pairs produce additional kinematic prefactors. These results isolate the only nonstandard and nontrivial invisible sector that can remain hidden in Michel-type lepton decay measurements. Phenomenologically, a subpercent branching fraction into this channel could bias the conventional muon-lifetime extraction of $G_F$ upward by enough for the corrected value to agree with the CKM-unitarity determination, while increasing the discrepancy with the electroweak fit.2026-05-09T19:52:26Z6 pages, 1 (new) figure (expanded phenomenological discussion on the possibility of bringing into agreement the low-energy determinations of $G_F$, from muon decay and Cabibbo unitarity, as well as the corresponding implications and feasibility)Pablo Roighttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15056v1The study of bulk damage of high gamma-irradiated $n^+$-in-$p$ silicon diodes2026-07-16T14:31:25ZThe bulk damage of $p$-type silicon sensors caused by gamma irradiation with high total ionizing doses has been investigated. The study was carried out on different types of $n^+$-in-$p$ silicon diodes with different oxygen concentrations and silicon bulk resistivities. The Secondary-Ion Mass Spectrometry technique was used to determine the relative concentration of oxygen in the individual samples. The measured diodes were irradiated by a $^{60}$Co gamma source to total ionizing doses ranging from 0.50 up to 8.28 MGy, and annealed for 80 minutes at 60°C. The main goal of the study was to characterize the gamma-radiation induced displacement damage by measuring IV and CV characteristics, and the evolution of the full depletion voltage with the total ionizing dose. The Transient Current Technique was used to verify the full depletion voltage and to extract the electric field distribution and the sign of the space charge in the silicon diodes irradiated to the lowest and the highest delivered total ionizing doses.
The results show a linear increase of the bulk leakage current with the total ionizing dose, with the damage coefficient being dependent on initial resistivity and oxygen concentration of the silicon diode. The effective doping concentration and full depletion voltage decrease significantly with an increasing total ionizing dose, before starting to increase again at a specific dose. We assume that the initial decrease in the effective doping concentration is caused by the effect of acceptor removal. An additional notable finding of this study is that the bulk leakage current and CV characteristics of the gamma-irradiated diodes do not show any evidence of an annealing effect.2026-07-16T14:31:25ZNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 1064 (2024) 169432M. MikestikovaP. FedericovaP. GallusR. JirasekJ. KozakovaJ. KrollJ. KvasnickaV. LatonovaI. MandicK. MasekP. NovotnyR. PrivaraP. TumaI. Zatocilova10.1016/j.nima.2024.169432http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15050v1Radiative corrections in neutral-current (anti)neutrino elastic scattering at $\text{GeV}$ energies I: Nucleon targets2026-07-16T14:29:41ZWe introduce radiative corrections in neutral-current (anti)neutrino-nucleon elastic scattering at $\text{GeV}$ energies within the effective field theory framework. We factorize cross sections into soft and hard functions, clarify the (anti)neutrino flavor dependence at both amplitude and cross-section levels, and improve the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) contributions to low-energy neutral-current processes. The radiative corrections at the single-nucleon level reach a magnitude comparable to the contributions from strange quarks. We also compare our results with the experimental data from BNL E734 and MiniBooNE collaborations, finding excellent agreements with the experimental data.2026-07-16T14:29:41Z52 pages, 28 figuresYi ChenOleksandr TomalakBing-Song Zouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15023v1Comparative study and optimization of SDHCAL hadronic energy reconstruction methods2026-07-16T14:10:39ZWe present a detailed study of hadronic shower energy reconstruction methods for the Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter (SDHCAL) within the ILD detector concept, using the Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) APRIL. Using samples of single $K^0_L$ and dijet ($u,d,s$) events, we compare linear, quadratic, split, and polynomial regression-based reconstruction formulas, focusing on their impact on linearity and resolution. The study also addresses angular corrections required in the barrel region due to non-perpendicular particle incidence. Results show that while all methods achieve good overall performance, the split method and the polynomial regression provide the best compromise across different energy regimes, offering improved resolution at low energies without compromising linearity at higher energies. For dijets, sensitivity to PFA confusion dominates the resolution at high energies. These findings highlight the potential of future improvements, notably the integration of precise timing information from the T-SDHCAL into APRIL, to further reduce confusion and enhance hadronic energy reconstruction for next-generation lepton colliders.2026-07-16T14:10:39Z20 pages, 14 figures, 4 tablesTanguy PasquierGérald GrenierImad Laktinehhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14986v1Relativistic corrections and high-energy resummation for exclusive heavy quarkonium photoproduction2026-07-16T13:36:56ZThe $O(v^2)$ correction to the high-energy resummed coefficient function for the exclusive photoproduction of vector ($1^{--}$) heavy quarkonia off hadrons is computed, thereby taking into account corrections of $O(v^2 α_s^n \ln^{n-1}(x/ξ))$. When expressed in terms of the physical vector-meson mass ($M_V$) and the relative heavy-quark velocity ($\langle v^2 \rangle$) using the Gremm-Kapustin relation, the computed correction turns out to be negligible at the scale $μ_F=M_V$. However, it partially cancels the $μ_F$ dependence of the $O(v^2)$ correction to the LO coefficient function in $α_s$, thereby improving the robustness of the predictions.2026-07-16T13:36:56Z12 pages, 4 figuresMaxim Nefedovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14942v1A Differential Neutral-to-Charged Current Double-Proton Observable for Studying Short-Range Correlations in Neutrino--Argon Scattering2026-07-16T12:52:42ZTwo-nucleon emission is a leading uncertainty in neutrino--nucleus interaction modeling, and no neutrino measurement constrains its short-range-correlation (SRC) component. We propose such a measurement: the ratio of neutral-current to charged-current two-proton production in neutrino--argon interactions as a function of the proton-pair relative momentum. Charged-current interactions convert the abundant neutron--proton SRC pairs into visible proton pairs, whereas neutral-current interactions lack an analogous SRC contribution because proton--proton pairs are about twenty times less abundant. The ratio is therefore predicted to decrease at large relative momentum, where the charged-current SRC contribution dominates, while the neutral-current sample provides a smooth reference determined mainly by final-state interactions and multinucleon processes. Simulations predict a suppression whose magnitude scales with the SRC fraction. Flux normalization and correlated detector systematics largely cancel in the ratio, making the measurement feasible with existing liquid-argon time projection chambers. Independently of the precise SRC contribution, this observable provides the first direct experimental probe of the isospin structure of weak two-nucleon emission.2026-07-16T12:52:42Z12 pages, 4 figuresA. BuenoD. Garcia-GamezC. Martin-Moraleshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14847v1A flexible DAQ system for the Timepix4 ASIC in the 4DPHOTON project2026-07-16T11:15:47ZThis paper presents the design and implementation of a flexible data acquisition system13 developed for the Timepix4 ASIC within the 4DPHOTON project. The system is based on a modular14 FPGA-centric architecture combining high-speed serial readout, Ethernet-based data transport,15 and deterministic multi-board synchronization. The hardware platform includes a scalable stack16 composed of commercial FPGA carrier boards, FMC-based interface electronics, detector-specific17 chipboards, and a dedicated Trigger Logic Unit for synchronized operation.18 The firmware architecture separates control and data paths, enabling independent configuration19 and high-throughput acquisition through UDP over 10 GbE links. The design supports zero-back-20 pressure operation toward the ASIC and allows adaptation of the readout bandwidth to different21 experimental conditions. Synchronization between multiple DAQ systems is achieved through22 a common clock and trigger distribution network, experimentally demonstrated with sub-100 ps23 precision.24 The system has been developed to support detector characterization, laboratory measurements,25 and beam-test campaigns for the 4DPHOTON detector concept. Hardware organization, firmware26 architecture, synchronization strategy, and performance measurements are presented.2026-07-16T11:15:47Z17 pages, 8 figuresN. V. BiesuzJ. AlozyR. BolzonellaV. CavalliniA. Cotta RamusinoM. FioriniE. FranzosoX. Llopart CudieA. Saputihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14793v1Track fitting at the full LHC collision rate2026-07-16T10:11:52ZThe LHCb experiment at the Large Hadron Collider underwent a major upgrade before the LHC Run 3 data taking period, employing an all-software approach in its trigger system. Here we present a fast implementation of a Kalman filter, used in the first trigger stage since the 2025 data taking period, allowing to determine parameter estimates of charged-particle trajectories at the full LHCb collision frequency of 30 MHz. This approach replaces computationally expensive magnetic field map lookups and numerical integration methods with fast analytical parameterisations while maintaining the mathematical framework of Kalman filtering. Implemented on approximately 500 GPUs within the first-level trigger, the algorithm has replaced the previous partial track fitting algorithm in the real-time trigger environment at the cost of a 2% increase in processing time. Compared to the previous fitter this parameterised Kalman filter shows a significantly improved momentum resolution, resulting in a factor of two improvement in the invariant mass resolutions for reconstructed D0 and J/ψ hadrons. It additionally demonstrates greater robustness against detector misalignment effects and substantially sharpens the discrimination between genuine particle trajectories and accidental background, more than doubling the rejection of the latter at no cost to genuine-track efficiency, for a standard selection working point.2026-07-16T10:11:52Z15 pages, 9 pretty figuresPierre BilloirThomas BoettcherMichel De CianLennart H. Ueckerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16268v2Experimental prospects for quantum decoherence measurements at colliders2026-07-16T09:56:57ZWe study the impact of radiation on quantum systems defined by the spins of elementary fermion-antifermion pairs produced at colliders. We present predictions for several processes, showing that energetic final-state radiation can induce decoherence and significantly reduce the entanglement of quantum systems formed by elementary fermion pairs. We investigate the feasibility of observing this effect experimentally in exclusive samples with energetic radiation. A statistically significant signal can be obtained with current data in associated $pp \rightarrow t\bar{t}(g)$ production at the LHC and in $e^+e^- \rightarrow τ^{+}τ^{-}(γ)$ production at Belle 2. Future electron-positron colliders operated at the $Z$ pole or well above the $t\bar{t}$ production threshold will extend these prospects further.2026-04-17T17:26:05Z4 pages, 2 figuresRafael AoudeJosé Manuel CamachoValentin DuruptGuillermo García-MirFabio MaltoniMaría Moreno LlácerLeonardo SatrioniKazuki SakuraiMarcel Voshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15646v3Observation of $CP$ violation in $B^{0}\!\to{J\mskip-3mu/\mskip-2muψ}ρ(770)^0$ decays2026-07-16T08:23:37ZThe time-dependent $CP$ asymmetry in $B^{0}\!\to{J\mskip-3mu/\mskip-2muψ}ρ(770)^0$ decays is measured using proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $6\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, collected with the LHCb detector at a center-of-mass energy of $13\,\text{TeV}$ during the years 2015-2018. The $CP$-violation parameters for this process are determined to be $2β^{\rm eff}_{c\bar{c}d} = 0.710 \pm 0.084 \pm 0.051\,\text{rad}$ and $|λ| = 1.019 \pm 0.034 \pm 0.024$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. This constitutes the first observation of time-dependent $CP$ violation in $B^{0}\!\to{J\mskip-3mu/\mskip-2muψ}ρ(770)^0$ decays. Assuming approximate SU(3) flavor symmetry, these results are combined with the previous consistent LHCb measurement to set the most stringent constraint on the penguin contribution, $Δφ_{s}$, to the $CP$-violating phase $φ_{s}$ in $B^{0}_{s}\!\to{J\mskip-3mu/\mskip-2muψ}φ(1020)$ decays, yielding $Δφ_{s} = 5.0 \pm 4.6\,\text{mrad}$.2026-01-22T04:52:27ZAll figures and tables, along with machine-readable versions and any supplementary material and additional information, are available at https://lbfence.cern.ch/alcm/public/analysis/full-details/1620/ (LHCb public pages)Phys. Rev. Lett. 137 (2026) 031803 LHCb collaborationR. AaijA. S. W. AbdelmottelebC. Abellan BetetaF. AbudinénT. AckernleyA. A. AdefisoyeB. AdevaM. AdinolfiP. AdlarsonC. AgapopoulouC. A. AidalaZ. AjaltouniS. AkarK. AkibaM. AktharP. AlbicoccoJ. AlbrechtR. AleksiejunasF. AlessioP. Alvarez CartelleR. AmalricS. AmatoJ. L. AmeyY. AmhisL. AnL. AnderliniM. AnderssonP. AndreolaM. AndreottiS. Andres EstradaA. AnelliD. AoC. ArataF. ArchilliZ. AregM. ArgentonS. Arguedas CuendisL. ArnoneA. ArtamonovM. ArtusoE. AslanidesR. Ataíde Da SilvaM. AtzeniB. AudurierJ. A. AuthierD. BacherI. Bachiller PereaS. BachmannM. BachmayerJ. J. BackZ. B. BaiP. Baladron RodriguezV. BalaguraA. BalboniW. BaldiniZ. BaldwinL. BalzaniH. BaoJ. Baptista de Souza LeiteC. Barbero PretelM. BarbettiI. R. BarbosaR. J. BarlowM. BarnyakovS. BarsukW. BarterJ. BartzS. BashirB. BatsukhP. B. BattistaA. BavarcheeA. BayA. BeckM. BeckerF. BedeschiI. B. BediagaN. A. BehlingS. BelinA. BellavistaK. BelousI. BelovI. BelyaevG. BenaneG. BencivenniE. Ben-HaimA. BerezhnoyR. BernetA. BertolinF. BettiJ. BexO. BezshyykoS. BhattacharyaM. S. BiekerN. V. BiesuzA. BiolchiniM. BirchF. C. R. BishopA. BitadzeA. BizzetiT. BlakeF. BlancJ. E. BlankS. BluskV. BocharnikovJ. A. BoelhauveO. Boente GarciaT. BoettcherA. BohareA. BoldyrevC. BolognaniR. BolzonellaR. B. BonacciN. BondarA. BordeliusF. BorgatoS. BorghiM. BorsatoJ. T. BorsukE. BottalicoS. A. BouchibaM. BovillT. J. V. BowcockA. BoyerC. BozziJ. D. BrandenburgA. Brea RodriguezN. BreerJ. BrodzickaJ. BrownD. BrunduE. BuchananM. Burgos MarcosC. BurrC. ButiJ. S. ButterJ. BuytaertW. ByczynskiS. CadedduH. CaiY. CaiA. CailletR. CalabreseL. CaleficeM. CalviM. Calvo GomezP. Camargo MagalhaesJ. I. Cambon BouzasP. CampanaA. C. CamposA. F. Campoverde QuezadaS. CapelliM. CaporaleL. CapriottiR. Caravaca-MoraA. CarboneL. Carcedo SalgadoR. CardinaleA. CardiniP. CarnitiL. CarusA. Casais VidalR. CasparyG. CasseM. CattaneoG. CavalleroV. CavalliniS. CelaniI. CelestinoS. CesareA. J. ChadwickI. ChahrourH. ChangM. CharlesPh. CharpentierE. ChatzianagnostouR. CheaibM. ChefdevilleC. ChenJ. ChenS. ChenZ. ChenA. Chen HuM. CherifA. ChernovS. ChernyshenkoX. ChiotopoulosV. ChobanovaM. ChrzaszczA. ChubykinV. ChulikovP. CiambroneX. Cid VidalG. CiezarekP. CifraP. E. L. ClarkeM. ClemencicH. V. CliffJ. ClosierC. Cocha ToapaxiV. CocoJ. CoganE. CognerasL. CojocariuS. CollavitiP. CollinsT. ColomboM. ColonnaA. Comerma-MontellsL. CongedoJ. ConnaughtonA. ContuN. CookeG. CordovaC. CoronelI. CorredoiraA. CorreiaG. CortiJ. Cottee MeldrumB. CouturierD. C. CraikM. Cruz TorresM. Cubero CamposE. Curras RiveraR. CurrieC. L. Da SilvaS. DadabaevX. DaiE. Dall'OccoJ. DalsenoC. D'AmbrosioJ. DanielG. DarzeA. DavidsonJ. E. DaviesO. De Aguiar FranciscoC. De AngelisF. De BenedettiJ. de BoerK. De BruynS. De CapuaM. De CianU. De Freitas Carneiro Da GracaE. De LuciaJ. M. De MirandaL. De PaulaM. De SerioP. De SimoneF. De VellisJ. A. de VriesF. DebernardisD. DecampS. DekkersL. Del BuonoB. DelaneyJ. DengV. DenysenkoO. DeschampsF. DettoriB. DeyP. Di NezzaI. DiachkovS. DidenkoS. DingY. DingL. DittmannV. DobishukA. D. DochevaA. DohenyC. DongF. DordeiA. C. dos ReisA. D. DowlingL. DreyfusW. DuanP. DudaL. DufourV. DukP. DuranteM. M. DurasJ. M. DurhamO. D. DurmusA. DziurdaA. DzyubaS. EasoE. EcksteinU. EgedeA. EgorychevV. EgorychevS. EisenhardtE. EjopuL. EklundM. ElashriD. Elizondo BlancoJ. EllbrachtS. ElyA. EneJ. EschleT. EvansF. FabianoS. FaghihL. N. FalcaoB. FangR. FantechiL. FantiniM. FariaK. FarmerF. FassinD. FazziniL. FelkowskiM. FengA. Fernandez CasaniM. Fernandez GomezA. D. FernezF. FerrariF. Ferreira RodriguesM. FerrilloM. Ferro-LuzziS. FilippovR. A. FiniM. FioriniM. FirlejK. L. FischerD. S. FitzgeraldC. FitzpatrickT. FiutowskiF. FleuretA. FominM. FontanaL. A. ForemanR. FortyD. Foulds-HoltV. Franco LimaM. Franco SevillaM. FrankE. FranzosoG. FrauC. FreiD. A. FridayJ. FuQ. FühringT. FulghesuG. GalatiM. D. GalatiA. Gallas TorreiraD. GalliS. GambettaM. GandelmanP. GandiniB. GanieH. GaoR. GaoT. Q. GaoY. GaoY. GaoY. GaoL. M. Garcia MartinP. Garcia MorenoJ. García PardiñasP. GardnerL. GarridoC. GasparA. GavrikovL. L. GerkenE. GersabeckM. GersabeckT. GershonS. GhizzoZ. GhorbanimoghaddamF. I. GiasemisV. GibsonH. K. GiemzaA. L. GilmanM. GiovannettiA. GioventùL. GirardeyM. A. GizaF. C. GlaserV. V. GligorovC. GöbelL. Golinka-BezshyykoE. GolobardesD. GolubkovA. GolutvinS. Gomez FernandezW. GomulkaI. Gonçales VazF. Goncalves AbrantesM. GoncerzG. GongJ. A. GoodingI. V. GorelovC. GottiE. GovorkovaJ. P. GrabowskiL. A. Granado CardosoE. GraugésE. GraveriniL. GrazetteG. GrazianiA. T. GrecuN. A. GrieserL. GrilloS. GromovC. GuM. GuariseL. GuerryA. -K. GuseinovE. GushchinY. GuzT. GysK. HabermannT. HadavizadehC. HadjivasiliouG. HaefeliC. HaenS. HakenG. HallettP. M. HamiltonJ. HammerichQ. HanX. HanS. Hansmann-MenzemerL. HaoN. HarnewT. H. HarrisM. HartmannS. HashmiJ. HeN. HeatleyA. HedesF. HemmerC. HendersonR. HendersonR. D. L. HendersonA. M. HennequinK. HennessyL. HenryJ. HerdP. Herrero GasconJ. HeuelA. HeynA. HicheurG. Hijano MendizabalJ. HorswillR. HouY. HouD. C. HoustonN. HowarthW. HuX. HuW. HulsbergenR. J. HunterM. HushchynD. HutchcroftM. IdzikD. IlinP. IltenA. IniukhinA. IohnerA. IshteevK. IvshinH. JageS. J. Jaimes EllesS. JakobsenT. JakoubekE. JansB. K. JashalA. JawaheryC. JayaweeraA. JelavicV. JevticZ. JiaE. JiangX. JiangY. JiangY. J. JiangE. Jimenez MoyaN. JindalM. JohnA. John Rubesh RajanD. JohnsonC. R. JonesS. JoshiB. JostJ. Juan CastellaN. JurikI. JuszczakK. KalecinskaD. KaminarisS. KandybeiM. KaneY. KangC. KarM. KaracsonA. KauniskangasJ. W. KautzM. K. KazaneckiF. KeizerM. KenzieT. KetelB. KhanjiA. KharisovaS. KholodenkoG. KhreichF. KirazT. KirnV. S. KirsebomS. KlaverN. KleijneA. KleimenovaD. K. KlekotsK. KlimaszewskiM. R. KmiecT. KnospeR. KolbS. KoliievL. KolkA. KonoplyannikovP. KopciewiczP. KoppenburgA. KorchinI. KostiukO. KotS. KotriakhovaE. KowalczykA. KozachukP. KravchenkoL. KravchukO. KravcovM. KrepsP. KrokovnyW. KrupaW. KrzemienO. KshyvanskyiS. KubisM. KucharczykV. KudryavtsevE. KulikovaA. KupscV. KushnirB. KutsenkoJ. KvapilI. KyryllinD. LacarrereP. Laguarta GonzalezA. LaiA. LampisD. LancieriniC. Landesa GomezJ. J. LaneG. LanfranchiC. LangenbruchJ. LangerT. LathamF. LazzariC. LazzeroniR. Le GacH. LeeR. LefèvreA. LeflatS. LegotinM. LehurauxE. Lemos CidO. LeroyT. LesiakE. D. LesserB. LeveringtonA. LiC. LiC. LiH. LiJ. LiK. LiL. LiP. LiP. -R. LiQ. LiT. LiT. LiY. LiY. LiY. LiZ. LianQ. LiangX. LiangZ. LiangS. LibralonA. LightbodyC. LinT. LinR. LindnerH. LintonR. LitvinovD. LiuF. L. LiuG. LiuK. LiuS. LiuW. LiuY. LiuY. LiuY. L. LiuG. Loachamin OrdonezI. LoboA. Lobo SalviaA. LoiT. LongF. C. L. LopesJ. H. LopesA. Lopez HuertasC. Lopez IribarnegarayS. López SoliñoQ. LuC. LucarelliD. LucchesiM. Lucio MartinezY. LuoA. LupatoE. LuppiK. LynchX. -R. LyuG. M. MaH. MaS. MaccoliniF. MachefertF. MaciucB. MackI. MackayL. M. MackeyL. R. Madhan MohanM. J. MaduraiD. MagdalinskiD. MaisuzenkoJ. J. MalczewskiS. MaldeL. MalentaccaA. MalininT. MaltsevG. MancaG. MancinelliC. MancusoR. Manera EscaleroF. M. ManganellaD. ManuzziD. MarangottoJ. F. MarchandR. MarchevskiU. MarconiE. MarianiS. MarianiC. Marin BenitoJ. MarksA. M. MarshallL. MartelG. MartelliG. MartellottiL. MartinazzoliM. MartinelliD. Martinez GomezD. Martinez SantosF. Martinez VidalA. Martorell i GranollersA. MassafferriR. MatevA. MathadV. MatiuninC. MatteuzziK. R. MattioliA. MauriE. MauriceJ. MauricioP. MayencourtJ. Mazorra de CosM. MazurekD. Mazzanti TaranconM. McCannN. T. McHughA. McNabR. McNultyB. MeadowsD. MelnychukD. Mendoza GranadaP. Menendez Valdes PerezF. M. MengM. MerkA. MerliL. Meyer GarciaD. MiaoH. MiaoM. MikhasenkoD. A. MilanesA. MinottiE. MinucciT. MirallesB. MitreskaD. S. MitzelR. MocanuA. ModakL. MoeserR. D. MoiseE. F. Molina CardenasT. MombächerM. MonkT. MonnardS. MonteilA. Morcillo GomezG. MorelloM. J. MorelloM. P. MorgenthalerA. MoroJ. MoronW. MorrenA. B. MorrisA. G. MorrisR. MountainZ. M. MuE. MuhammadF. MuheimM. MulderK. MüllerF. Muñoz-RojasV. MytrochenkoP. NaikT. NakadaR. NandakumarG. NapoletanoI. NastevaM. NeedhamE. NekrasovaN. NeriS. NeubertN. NeufeldP. NeustroevJ. NicoliniD. NicotraE. M. NielN. NikitinL. NisiQ. NiuB. K. NjokiP. NogarolliP. NoggaC. NormandJ. Novoa FernandezG. NowakC. NunezH. N. NurA. Oblakowska-MuchaV. ObraztsovT. OeserA. OkhotnikovO. OkhrimenkoR. OldemanF. OlivaE. Olivart PinoM. OloccoR. H. O'NeilJ. S. Ordonez SotoD. OsthuesJ. M. Otalora GoicocheaP. OwenA. OyangurenO. OzcelikF. PaciollaA. PadeeK. O. PadekenB. PagareT. PajeroA. PalanoL. PaliniM. PalutanC. PanX. PanS. PanebiancoS. PaniskakiG. PanshinL. PaolucciA. PapanestisM. PappagalloL. L. PappalardoC. PappenheimerC. ParkesD. ParmarG. PassalevaD. PassaroA. PastoreM. PatelJ. PatocC. PatrignaniA. PaulC. J. PawleyA. PellegrinoJ. PengX. PengM. Pepe AltarelliS. PerazziniD. PereimaH. Pereira Da CostaM. Pereira MartinezA. Pereiro CastroC. PerezP. PerretA. PerrevoortA. PerroM. J. PetersK. PetridisA. PetroliniS. PezzuloJ. P. PfallerH. PhamL. PicaM. PicciniL. PiccoloB. PietrzykG. PietrzykR. N. PilatoD. PinciF. PisaniM. PizzichemiV. M. PlacintaM. Plo CasasusT. PoeschlF. PolciM. Poli LenerA. PoluektovN. PolukhinaI. PolyakovE. PolycarpoS. PonceD. PopovK. PoppS. PoslavskiiK. PrasanthC. ProuveD. ProvenzanoV. PugatchA. Puicercus GomezG. PunziJ. R. PybusQ. Q. QianW. QianN. QinR. QuaglianiR. I. Rabadan TrejoR. RaczJ. H. RademackerM. RamaM. Ramírez GarcíaV. Ramos De OliveiraM. Ramos PernasM. S. RangelF. RatnikovG. RavenM. Rebollo De MiguelF. RediJ. ReichF. ReissZ. RenP. K. ResmiM. Ribalda GalvezR. RibattiG. RicartD. RiccardiS. RicciardiK. RichardsonM. Richardson-SlipperF. RiehnK. RinnertP. RobbeG. RobertsonE. RodriguesA. Rodriguez AlvarezE. Rodriguez FernandezJ. A. Rodriguez LopezE. Rodriguez RodriguezJ. RoenschA. RogachevA. RogovskiyD. L. RolfP. RoloffV. RomanovskiyA. Romero VidalG. RomoliniF. RonchettiT. RongM. RotondoM. S. RudolphM. Ruiz DiazR. A. Ruiz FernandezJ. Ruiz VidalJ. J. Saavedra-AriasJ. J. Saborido SilvaS. E. R. Sacha Emile R.N. SagidovaD. SahooN. SahooB. SaittaM. SalomoniI. SanderswoodR. SantacesariaC. Santamarina RiosM. SantimariaL. SantoroE. SantovettiA. SaputiD. SaraninA. SarnatskiyG. SarpisM. SarpisC. SatrianoA. SattaM. SaurD. SavrinaH. SazakF. SborzacchiA. ScarabottoS. SchaelS. ScherlM. SchillerH. SchindlerM. SchmellingB. SchmidtN. SchmidtS. SchmittH. SchmitzO. SchneiderA. SchopperN. SchulteM. H. SchuneG. SchweringB. SciasciaA. SciuccatiG. ScrivenI. SegalS. SellamA. SemennikovT. SengerM. Senghi SoaresA. SergiN. SerraL. SestiniB. Sevilla SanjuanY. ShangD. M. ShangaseM. ShapkinR. S. SharmaL. ShchutskaT. ShearsL. ShekhtmanZ. ShenS. ShengV. ShevchenkoB. ShiJ. ShiQ. ShiW. S. ShiY. ShimizuE. ShmaninR. ShorkinR. Silva CoutinhoG. SimiS. SimoneM. SinghaI. SiralN. SkidmoreT. SkwarnickiM. W. SlaterE. SmithM. SmithL. Soares LavraM. D. SokoloffF. J. P. SolerA. SolominA. SolovevK. SolovievaN. S. SommerfeldR. SongY. SongY. SongY. S. SongF. L. Souza De AlmeidaB. Souza De PaulaK. M. SowaE. Spadaro NorellaE. SpedicatoJ. G. SpeerP. SpradlinF. StagniM. StahlS. StahlS. StanislausM. StefaniakO. SteinkampD. StrekalinaY. SuF. SuljikJ. SunJ. SunL. SunD. SundfeldW. SutcliffeP. SvihraV. SvintozelskyiK. SwientekF. SwystunA. SzabelskiT. SzumlakY. TanY. TangY. T. TangM. D. TatJ. A. Teijeiro JimenezA. TerentevF. TerzuoliF. TeubertE. ThomasD. J. D. ThompsonA. R. Thomson-StrongH. TilquinV. TisserandS. T'JampensM. TobinT. T. TodorovL. TomassettiG. TonaniX. TongT. TorkL. ToscanoD. Y. TouC. TripplG. TuciN. TuningL. H. UeckerA. UklejaD. J. UnverzagtA. UpadhyayB. UrbachA. UsachovA. UstyuzhaninU. UwerV. VagnoniA. VaitkeviciusV. Valcarce CadenasG. ValentiN. Valls CanudasJ. van EldikH. Van HeckeE. van HerwijnenC. B. Van HulseR. Van LaakM. van VeghelG. VasquezR. Vazquez GomezP. Vazquez RegueiroC. Vázquez SierraS. VecchiJ. Velilla SernaJ. J. VelthuisM. VeltriA. VenkateswaranM. VerdogliaM. VesterinenW. VetensD. Vico BenetP. Vidrier VillalbaM. Vieites DiazX. Vilasis-CardonaE. Vilella FiguerasA. VillaP. VincentB. VivacquaF. C. VolleD. vom BruchN. VoropaevK. VosC. VrahasJ. WagnerJ. WalshE. J. WaltonG. WanA. WangB. WangC. WangG. WangH. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangJ. WangM. WangN. W. WangR. WangX. WangX. WangX. W. WangY. WangY. WangY. H. WangZ. WangZ. WangJ. A. WardM. WaterlaatN. K. WatsonD. WebsdaleY. WeiZ. WeidaJ. WendelB. D. C. WesthenryC. WhiteM. WhiteheadE. WhiterA. R. WiederholdD. WiednerM. A. WiegertjesC. WildG. WilkinsonM. K. WilkinsonM. WilliamsM. J. WilliamsM. R. J. WilliamsR. WilliamsS. WilliamsZ. WilliamsF. F. WilsonM. WinnW. WislickiM. WitekL. WitolaT. WolfE. WoodG. WormserS. A. WottonH. WuJ. WuX. WuY. WuZ. WuK. WyllieS. XianZ. XiangY. XieT. X. XingA. XuL. XuM. XuZ. XuZ. XuZ. XuS. YadavK. YangX. YangY. YangY. YangZ. YangH. YeungH. YinX. YinC. Y. YuJ. YuX. YuanY YuanJ. A. Zamora SaaM. ZavertyaevM. ZdybalF. ZenesiniC. ZengM. ZengC. ZhangD. ZhangJ. ZhangL. ZhangR. ZhangS. ZhangS. L. ZhangY. ZhangY. Z. ZhangZ. ZhangY. ZhaoA. ZhelezovS. Z. ZhengX. Z. ZhengY. ZhengT. ZhouX. ZhouV. ZhovkovskaL. Z. ZhuX. ZhuX. ZhuY. ZhuV. ZhukovJ. ZhuoD. ZulianiG. Zunica10.1103/6f6r-51brhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14691v1Summary of quality control (QC) of ATLAS18 production ITk strip sensors2026-07-16T07:52:20ZTo address the demanding operational requirements of the High-Luminosity upgrade of the Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC), the ATLAS experiment is replacing its current Inner Detector with a new all-silicon Inner Tracker (ITk). The ITk will feature an active sensor area of 165 m2, with its outer tracking layers populated by approximately 18,000 ATLAS18 n+-in-p silicon strip sensors. The silicon sensors, available in eight geometries tailored to two barrel and six endcap module types, respectively, are designed to tolerate fluences of up to 1.6 x 10^15 neq/cm2 and ionizing doses of 66 Mrad. A comprehensive, multi-year Quality Control (QC) program is underway across multiple international institutes to evaluate these ITk strip sensors for mechanical and electrical conformity. The QC process includes IV/CV characterization, full strip tests, long-term current stability monitoring, visual inspection, and metrology tests. To manage the high throughput of about 500 sensors per month, the collaboration has implemented standardized test procedures, software packages for data monitoring and integrity checks, unified data formats, and automated analysis tools. The standardization ensures consistent pass/fail evaluation and centralized data handling that enables effective identification of trends and anomalies at all sites during multi-year production. This contribution presents an overview of the ITk strip sensor production and QC framework, along with key findings throughout the whole production, such as charge-up of sensors, stability of the leakage currents, nonrecoverable IV breakdown, and low inter-strip isolation within wafers. It provides insights into sensor yield, quality trends, and reviews specific case studies, such as p-stop doping non-uniformity. Over 91% of the production, totaling over 590 batches, were tested and accepted as-is.2026-07-16T07:52:20Z7 pagesP. FederičováaA. AffolderK. AffolderA. AwaisG. A. BeckA. J. BevanZ. ChenJ. DandoyI. DawsonV. FadeyevJ. Fernandez-TejeroE. C. HillS. HiroseL. HommelsT. IvisonC. JessimanK. KariyapperumaS. KatznelsonJ. KellerC. T. KleinT. KoffasI. KopsalisJ. KozákováJ. KrollM. KůtováJ. KvasničkaK. MaeyamaR. R. Marcelo GregorioF. Martinez-MckinneyM. MikeštíkováP. S. MiyagawaL. Morelos-ZaragozaK. NakamuraQ. PaddockK. SatoE. StaatsP. TůmaM. UllanY. UnnoY. ZhaoS. C. Zenz10.1016/j.nima.2026.171716http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22411v2Probing unexplored spin-dependent dark matter-proton coupling with few-photoelectron threshold in COSINE-1002026-07-16T05:16:49ZWe report new constraints on the spin-dependent scattering cross section between low-mass dark matter and protons using data collected by the COSINE-100 experiment. By implementing a specialized event selection process using a multi-layer perceptron and robust noise mitigation, this analysis pioneers a detection threshold of 3 and 4 isolated peaks, corresponding to the reconstructed photoelectrons, which are significantly lower than the 8 photoelectron threshold used in previous analyses. In this unstudied few-photoelectron regime, where instrumental noise and phosphorescence are prevalent, we utilize a phenomenological background model to search for the annual modulation signal expected from the Standard Halo Model. No statistically significant annual modulation is observed in our data. We derive new 90% confidence level (C.L.) upper limits for the spin-dependent DM-proton cross section, establishing the world's most stringent constraints in the 1.75-2.25 GeV/c$^2$ mass range. Furthermore, by incorporating the Migdal effect, we extend the experimental sensitivity to the sub-GeV/c$^2$ regime, setting world-leading limits in the 15-58 MeV/c$^2$ range. These results demonstrate the capability of NaI(Tl) target materials to probe previously unexplored regions of the dark matter parameter space.2026-03-23T18:00:16ZW. K. KimN. CarlinJ. Y. ChoS. J. ChoS. ChoiA. C. EzeribeL. E. FrançaR. F. MuhdiO. GilevaC. HaI. S. HahnE. J. JeonH. W. JooW. G. KangM. KauerB. H. KimD. Y. KimH. J. KimJ. KimK. W. KimS. H. KimS. K. KimY. D. KimY. H. KimB. R. KoY. J. KoB. C. KohD. H. LeeE. K. LeeH. LeeH. S. LeeH. Y. LeeI. S. LeeJ. LeeJ. Y. LeeM. H. LeeS. H. LeeS. H. LeeY. J. LeeD. S. LeonardN. T. LuanV. H. A. MachadoB. B. ManzatoR. H. MaruyamaS. L. OlsenH. K. ParkH. S. ParkJ. C. ParkJ. S. ParkK. S. ParkK. ParkS. D. ParkR. L. C. PittaH. PrihtiadiC. RottK. A. ShinD. F. F. S. CavalcanteM. K. SonN. J. C. SpoonerL. T. TrucL. YangG. H. Yuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15416v3Measurement of forward photon production cross-section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 510 GeV with RHICf detector2026-07-16T03:42:08ZThis study reported the inclusive differential production cross-section of photons in six pseudorapidity regions: 6.1 < $η$ < 6.5, 6.5 < $η$ < 7.0, 7.0 < $η$ <7.5, 7.5 < $η$ <8.0, 8.0 < $η$ < 8.5, and $η$ > 8.5, measured through the RHICf experiment with pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 510 GeV conducted in June 2017. In addition, the cross-sections in the three regions of the $x_F$-$p_T$ phase space coverage that are same as those of the LHCf results at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 and 13 TeV were obtained and compared. Considering the uncertainties, the results were observed to be consistent with both the Feynman scaling law and the model predictions of EPOS-LHC, QGSJET-II-04, Sibyll 2.3d, and DPMjet-III 2019.1, although certain models exhibited weak collision energy dependencies.2022-03-29T10:31:07Z21 pages, 7 figuresO. AdrianiE. BertiL. BonechiR. D'AlessandroY. GotoB. HongY. ItowK. KasaharaM. H. KimY. KimJ. H. LeeS. LeeT. LjubicicH. MenjoI. NakagawaA. OgawaS. OhK. OhashiR. PakT. SakoN. SakuraiK. SatoR. SeidlK. TanidaS. ToriiA. Tricomihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18209v2Lattice determination of the neutrino background for $J/ψ\rightarrow γ+ \textrm{invisible}$2026-07-16T01:57:52ZSearching for dark matter is a primary goal of modern astronomy and particle physics. Invisible decays of heavy quarkonia are particularly promising for probing light dark matter, attracting broad interest due to their unique sensitivity. Experiments searching for radiative invisible decays of the $J/ψ$ have steadily improved upper limits, and upcoming facilities will push sensitivity further--making the precise determination and subtraction of the neutrino background indispensable. Here, we present the first lattice QCD calculation of the Standard Model decay $J/ψ\to γν\barν$, an irreducible background to $J/ψ\rightarrow γ+ \textrm{invisible}$. Our result for the branching fraction is $\operatorname{Br}(J/ψ\rightarrow γν\barν)=1.04(7)(8)\times 10^{-10}$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is our systematic estimate. This work advances lattice-based determinations of neutrino backgrounds to quarkonium invisible decays, delivering an ab initio benchmark for $J/ψ\rightarrow γ+ \textrm{invisible}$. Our approach generalizes to other quarkonium channels (e.g., $Υ/φ\rightarrow γ+\textrm{invisible}$) and provides critical theoretical support for dark matter searches at colliders.2026-01-26T06:47:06Z8 pages, 5 figures, accepted by PRDYu MengNing LiChuan LiuHaobo YanKe-Long ZhangXue-Ze Zhang