https://arxiv.org/api/FSa++rTYoJ7PufQUw7Lj0pWh6G42026-04-03T08:36:16Z1205659015http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00204v1No-Go Theorem for Singularity Resolution2026-03-31T20:17:50ZWe prove a No-Go theorem for singularity resolution in gravitational collapse: within any analytic gravitational theory, including general relativity and all theories with polynomial actions, quantum corrections introduced solely as effective matter sources are insufficient to halt singularities. This rules out singularity resolution via effective energy density in a broad class of quantum gravity approaches, including asymptotic safety and noncommutative geometry, which inevitably yield finite-time singularities or geodesic incompleteness. Resolution strictly requires either non-analytic modifications to the gravitational action, or a vanishing effective energy density at high densities (as realized in loop quantum gravity's Planck stars). The theorem is proved via an intrinsic $f(\mathbb{Q})$ gravity framework, extended universally to general relativity, $f(\mathbb{R})$, and $f(\mathbb{T})$ through the geometrical trinity--with regularity criteria and junction conditions grounded in non-metricity, free of standard GR tools.2026-03-31T20:17:50Z6+7pages, 1 figureZhen-Xiao ZhangChen LanYan-Gang Miaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00193v1On Entropic Gravity from BFSS Matrix Theory2026-03-31T19:50:21ZWe study Matrix theory at strong coupling in a setting describing two static objects a fixed distance apart, using numerical techniques. We reproduce the exact general relativistic force law between the two objects as an entropic force in Matrix theory. This involves employing an operator algebra that represents an external observer measuring the relative positions and momenta of the two objects. We identify the location of the horizons of the objects from this entropic force and are led to a modification of the Schwarzschild spacetime inside the horizon. We find evidence that the inside of a black hole is instead to be described by AdS space. The conclusions constitute numerical validation of Verlinde's entropic gravity proposition and the fuzzball paradigm.2026-03-31T19:50:21Z29 pages, 11 figuresKorin Aldam-TajimaVatche Sahakianhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00182v1Limits to Computational Acceleration Imposed by Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Gravity2026-03-31T19:33:32ZA computer, in order to perform a given computation, requires a certain amount of space (memory) and a certain amount of time (runtime). This leaves certain computations beyond reach due to technological limits on processing speed and memory density. Some computations, such as the halting problem, are not possible even in principle. However, curved spacetimes and exotic fields appear to provide avenues to accelerate computation, for instance by exploiting time dilation. Impossible computations seemingly become tractable, butting up against intuition. However, we show that such schemes are consistently thwarted by physical effects from quantum gravity (including swampland conjectures) and quantum field theory in curved space. More precisely, we show that an observer and a computer able to withstand energy scales up to order $E$ can, by using relativistic effects, accelerate computation at a rate of at most $\mathcal O(1)E$ e-folds per unit time in natural units: $(\lnα)/τ\lesssim E$. The Bekenstein bound for entropy can then be understood as the space (memory) analogue to (run)time: if a computer of length scale $D$, operating at energies up to order $E$, has access to $N$ different memory states, then $(\ln N)/D\lesssim E$.2026-03-31T19:33:32Z28 pages, 7 figuresLeron BorstenHyungrok Kimhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00170v1Thermodynamics of dynamical black holes beyond perturbation theory2026-03-31T19:20:43ZThe close similarities of the three laws of black hole mechanics, discovered by Bardeen, Carter and Hawking, with the laws of thermodynamics led to the identification of a multiple of the area of the event horizon with entropy. However, developments over the past two decades have shown that this paradigm has some important limitations, especially because of the teleological nature of event horizons. After a brief review of these limitations, we will show that they can be overcome using quasi-local horizons. Specifically, the new first law applies to black holes in general relativity that can be \emph{arbitrarily far from equilibrium} and refers to \emph{finite} changes that occur due to \emph{physical processes} at the horizon. The second law is now a \emph{quantitative} statement that relates the change in the area of a dynamical horizon segment due to fluxes of energy falling into the black hole. Together, they lead one to identify black hole entropy with the area of marginally trapped surfaces in quasi-local horizons, generalizing recent {perturbative} findings that it should be identified not with the area of the event horizon but with the area of a marginally trapped surface inside it.2026-03-31T19:20:43Z4 Figures, 1 Table, 53 pages, Detailed version of arXiv:2512.11659Abhay AshtekarDaniel E. ParaizoJonathan Shuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10567v2Gravitational wave polarization modes and the kinematical tensors in general relativity and beyond2026-03-31T18:50:19ZRelations between the kinematical tensors (the expansion, the shear, and the vorticity) and the polarization modes of gravitational waves are studied within the context of metric theories of gravity by considering freely falling test particles. After analyzing exact relations, we consider slowly moving particles under the influence of a weak gravitational field. Linearized plane waves of theories representative of those determined by a general second-order Lagrangian, including General Relativity, are shown to exemplify the following interconnections: between the transverse components of the shear and the transverse tensor polarization mode; between the expansion, and both the transverse scalar and the longitudinal polarization modes; and between the longitudinal-transverse components of both the shear and the vorticity, and the vector polarization mode. These relations, from the theoretical point of view, offer a novel insight into the interpretation of the polarization modes in terms of the kinematical tensors. Additionally, the inclusion of the kinematical tensors in the study of gravitational waves might provide a new outlook on their phenomenology.2025-11-13T18:07:20Z6142 words (incl. 1 table); Matches the published versionEur. Phys. J. C 86 (2026) 323Cynthia MaldonadoFrancisco NettelPedro A. Sánchez10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15567-6http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00139v1The Observer Paradigm in Semiclassical Gravity: A Postmodern Perspective2026-03-31T18:46:52ZRecent advances in semiclassical gravity, both in our understanding of the gravitational path integral and the algebraic structure of a gravitating subregion, rely on the presence of an observer to obtain a nontrivial Hilbert space for closed universe backgrounds. Here I examine this proposal from a postmodern lens, identifying attempts to define ``observer rules'' as manifestations of metanarrative breakdown: the observer both supplies and undermines the perturbative gravitational Hilbert space. Rather than resolving this tension, I advocate for a post-postmodern acceptance of the incompatibility between observer-dependent and observer-free descriptions of closed universes, treating the ambiguity as a feature of quantum gravity's fundamental degrees of freedom. To my knowledge, this is the first reference to post-postmodernism in concert with physics.2026-03-31T18:46:52Z10 pages, 1 figure, written for the Gravity Research Foundation 2026 Awards for Essays on GravitationSean McBridehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00134v1Does a wormhole survive a cosmological bounce?2026-03-31T18:39:48ZWe investigate whether a dynamical wormhole could survive in a universe that undergoes a cosmological bounce. First, the conditions under which a wormhole could persist from a contracting to an expanding phase of the cosmos are presented. Then, the only two known cosmological solutions of Einstein's equations representing wormholes are analyzed, and it is shown that both dynamical wormholes exist for all cosmic times on both sides of a bouncing universe and at the bounce itself. We also provide a detailed analysis of the causal structure of such spacetimes and the matter content of the wormhole. Finally, some possible astrophysical manifestations of surviving wormholes in a bouncing universe are mentioned. Our results show that, at least for the Kim and Pérez-Raia Neto solutions, there is no topology change in the chosen cosmological model with a bounce.2026-03-31T18:39:48Z26 pages, 13 figures, accepted for publication in General Relativity and GravitationDaniela PérezGustavo E. RomeroSantiago E. Perez Bergliaffahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00116v1How to (Non-)Perturb a BPS Black Hole2026-03-31T18:24:41ZWe relate the structure of non-perturbative corrections to BPS black hole observables in flat-spacetime theories with certain properties of probe charged particles in the near-horizon geometry. Concretely, we consider 4d $\mathcal{N} = 2$ supergravity with an infinite tower of F-terms and probe branes in $\text{AdS}_2\times \mathbf{S}^2$ backgrounds threaded by constant electric-magnetic fields. The higher dimensional operators we pick are computed by Type II topological string theory, and we approximate them via the constant map contribution, which is valid at large volume and can be interpreted as arising from D0-branes integrated out in M-theory on a Calabi-Yau threefold times a circle. We analyze the resulting force conditions on massive particles carrying $(q_A, p^A)$ charges, their classical trajectories, and the 1-loop effective action they produce. A simple semiclassical analysis allows us to understand qualitatively the structure of the non-perturbative corrections. The exact path integral assessment then reproduces the Gopakumar--Vafa integral of the flat-spacetime theory, now evaluated in the black hole attractor geometry. Thus, we make explicit how the physics of the fully backreacted black hole solution is controlled by the behaviour of the light D-brane states which generate the relevant set of higher derivative corrections.2026-03-31T18:24:41Z24 pages + appendices, 4 figures, contribution to the proceedings of Corfu Summer Institute 2025 "School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity" (CORFU2025), 27 April - 28 September, 2025, Corfu, GreeceAlberto CastellanoMatteo Zattihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00111v1Eppur non si trovano Vol. 2: No Planetary-mass Primordial Black Holes toward the Andromeda Galaxy2026-03-31T18:22:51ZA recent preprint by Sugiyama et al. reported the discovery of twelve candidates for short-timescale (less than one day) gravitational microlensing events based on high-cadence photometric observations of the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) using the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam. These detections were attributed to a large population of planetary-mass primordial black holes (PBHs) that could account for the entirety of the dark matter in the Milky Way and M31 halos. However, these results are in clear tension with previous searches for short-timescale microlensing events toward the Magellanic Clouds, such as those by the OGLE survey. In addition, both the temporal and spatial distributions of the Subaru candidates are inconsistent with expectations for microlensing events. Here, we reanalyze the Subaru data using an independent difference image analysis photometric pipeline. We find that all twelve candidates identified by Sugiyama et al. exhibit asymmetric light curves and/or variability on multiple nights of Subaru observations. Our analysis reveals that among them ten objects are RR Lyrae stars, one is an eclipsing binary, and one is an unclassified variable star. We find no compelling evidence for short-timescale microlensing events among the candidates identified in the Subaru data set, nor for a significant population of planetary-mass PBHs as dark matter components. Our results underscore the necessity of robust variable-star rejection in high-cadence microlensing searches using large telescopes.2026-03-31T18:22:51Zsubmitted to Acta Astronomica, comments on arXiv:2602.05840Przemek MrózAndrzej Udalskihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00095v1Instanton condensation and a new phase of BPS black holes2026-03-31T18:18:42ZWe analyse the 1/16-BPS superconformal index for BPS black holes at equal charge in $AdS_5 \times S_5$, uncovering evidence for a new instability in the microcanonical ensemble along the small black hole saddle. This is indicated by instanton condensation in the matrix model description of the index. This instability occurs for black holes of radius close to, but below, the scale at which black holes become `small', and implies a new dominant phase in this region. We propose a connection to the partially deconfined phase in the field theory dual description. This would resolve recent confusion about the location of the partially deconfined phase in the BPS phase diagram and promises new avenues for understanding confinement, partial deconfinement, and the encoding of colour degrees of freedom under the holographic map. We also motivate the importance of instantons in partial deconfinement from a matrix model perspective.2026-03-31T18:18:42Z41 pages, 19 figuresJack Holdenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00092v1The time of arrival problem in the Page-Wootters formalism2026-03-31T18:10:55ZThe time-of-arrival problem asks for the probability distribution for when a quantum particle reaches a specified location. It has been the subject of decades of debate, exemplifying the lack of a self-adjoint time observable in quantum theory. In the Page-Wootters framework, time is a relational quantity, emerging from correlations between a system and a clock induced by a global Hamiltonian constraint. We construct a time-of-arrival distribution by inverting the Page-Wootters approach, asking what time a clock reads given that the particle arrives at some fixed position. The result coincides with a common approach to the time-of-arrival problem, suggesting a potential relational interpretation of the latter. In addition to providing a relational description of the time-of-arrival problem, this gives an application of the Page-Wootters formalism to a concrete physical problem, and reveals some complications with its canonical interpretation as a theory of conditional probabilities.2026-03-31T18:10:55Z11 pages, 1 figureNiyusha HosseiniMaximilian P. E. Lockhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20342v2Advanced Virgo Plus for O5 -- Design Report Overview2026-03-31T17:12:40ZThis document presents an overview of the design, implementation, and expected performance of the Advanced Virgo Plus (AdV+) upgrades in view of the O5 observing run. Following the experience gained during the O4 commissioning and operations, the Virgo Collaboration has revised the upgrade strategy to address limitations associated with marginally stable recycling cavities. The O5 upgrade program combines elements from the original AdV+ Phase II project with new design solutions, including the implementation of stable recycling cavities, a major modification to the central interferometer layout, and a comprehensive renewal of critical subsystems. The planned upgrades are organized in two steps, targeting progressive improvements in operational stability, noise reduction, and detector sensitivity. Key developments include new vacuum infrastructures, suspensions, mirrors, optical configurations, quantum noise reduction systems, and high-power laser technologies. The resulting configuration is expected to significantly enhance the interferometer performance, enabling a substantial increase in astrophysical reach and scientific return during O5.2026-03-20T09:57:10ZF. AcerneseA. AgapitoD. AgarwalI. -L. AhrendL. AielloA. AinS. AlbanesiW. AliC. AllénéA. AlloccaW. AmarA. AmatoF. AmicucciC. AmraM. AndiaT. AndrićS. AnsoldiS. AntierE. Z. AppavuravtherM. Arca SeddaF. ArcipreteF. ArmatoN. ArnaudL. AspreaM. AssiduoS. Assis de Souza MeloP. AstoneF. AttadioF. AubinG. AvalloneS. BabakS. BagnascoT. BakaG. BalbiG. BaldiN. BaldicchiG. BallardinB. BanerjeeM. BarattiP. BarneoF. BaroneM. BarsugliaD. BartaA. BastiM. BawajM. BazzanF. BeirnaertM. BejgerD. BelardinelliC. BellaniL. BellizziD. Beltran-MartinezI. BentaraS. BeraS. BernuzziD. BersanettiT. BertheasA. BertoliniG. BevilacquaV. BiancalanaA. BianchiF. BianchiA. BinettiS. BiniS. BiotM. BitossiM. -A. BizouardG. BoileauM. BoldriniA. BolliandR. BondarescuF. BonduR. BonnandN. BorghiV. BoschiY. BothraA. BoudonA. BozziC. BradaschiaM. BranchesiT. BriantA. BrilletM. L. BrozzettiG. BrunoF. BucciO. BulashenkoT. BulikH. J. BultenR. BuscicchioD. BuskulicC. BuyR. CabritaG. CagnoliE. CalloniM. CanepaG. Caneva SantoroE. CapocasaG. CapocciaG. CapurriG. CarapellaF. CarbognaniM. CarpinelliG. CarulloA. Casallas-LagosJ. Casanueva DiazC. CasentiniR. CavalieriG. CellaS. CepicP. Cerdá-DuránE. CesariniW. ChaibiE. Chassande-MottinS. ChatyP. ChessaF. ChiadiniA. ChincariniM. L. ChiofaloA. ChiummoN. ChristensenG. CianiM. CieślarP. CiecielagM. CifaldiS. ClesseF. ClevaE. CocciaE. CodazzoP. -F. CohadonS. ColaceA. ColomboL. ContiI. Cordero-CarriónS. CorezziL. A. CoruboloA. CozzumboJ. R. CudellE. CuocoM. CusinatoB. D'AngeloS. D'AntonioL. D'OnofrioD. D'UrsoG. DályaS. Dall'OssoT. Dal CantonS. Dal PraS. DanilishinV. DattiloA. DaumasM. DavierP. DavisJ. DegallaixC. J. Delgado MendezS. Della TorreW. Del PozzoA. DemagnyG. DemasiA. DepasseJ. De BolleM. De LaurentisF. De LilloF. De MarcoF. De MatteisR. De PietriR. De RosaC. De RossiR. De SimoneC. DiazD. DikshaJ. DingM. Di CesareL. Di FioreM. Di GiovanniT. Di GirolamoS. Di PaceI. Di PalmaD. Di PieroF. Di RenzoA. Domiciano De SouzaT. DooneyO. DoroshM. DragoM. DuboisU. DupletsaH. DuvalP. -A. DuverneM. EbersoldH. EinsleL. ErricoM. EspositoF. FabriziV. FafoneM. FaysE. FenyvesiT. FernandesS. FerraiuoloF. FidecaroP. FiguraA. FioriI. FioriR. FittipaldiV. FiumaraR. FlaminioJ. A. FontK. FranceschettiF. FrappezS. FrascaF. FrasconiA. FreiseO. FreitasB. GadreS. GalaudageB. GaraventaJ. García-BellidoP. García AbiaJ. GargiuloX. GarridoF. GarufiC. GasbarraF. GautierG. GemmeA. GennaiV. GennariArchisman GhoshS. GkaitatzisF. GlotinS. Gomez LopezA. Goodwin-JonesM. GosselinC. GostiauxR. GouatyA. GradoM. GranataV. GranataG. GrecoA. C. GreenG. GrignaniC. GrimaudD. GuerraD. GuettaG. M. GuidiF. GulminelliY. GuoN. GutierrezM. HaneyS. HarikumarT. HarmarkJ. HarmsM. T. HartmanB. HaskellD. HegdeH. HeitmannG. HemmingJ. HeynenS. HildD. HofmanN. A. HollandL. HonetC. A. HrishikeshW. -F. HsuV. HuiL. IampieriG. A. IandoloM. IanniG. IannoneA. IerardiG. IorioP. IosifC. JacquetP. -E. JacquetT. JacquotJ. JanquartS. JarabaP. JaranowskiG. JoubertV. JusteW. KiendrebeogoG. KoekoekS. KoleyA. E. KoloniariA. KoushikA. KrólakE. KrajaS. L. KranzhoffJ. KubiszA. LakhalM. LallemanA. Lartaux-VollardL. LavezziC. LazarteC. LazzaroP. LeaciA. LemaîtreM. LentiM. LeonardiM. LequimeN. LeroyN. LetendreM. LethuillierS. LexmondM. Le JeanT. G. F. LiJ. -P. LocquetA. LongoD. LopezM. Lopez PortillaM. LorenziniV. LorietteG. LosurdoL. LucchesiD. LumacaL. LunghiniA. MacquetS. S. MadekarS. MaenautR. MaggioreM. MagnozziE. MajoranaN. ManM. MancarellaV. ManganoM. MantovaniM. MapelliS. MarchettiC. MarinelliF. MarionS. MarsatF. MartelliM. MartinezV. MartinezA. MartiniL. MassaroA. MasserotS. MastrogiovanniG. MastropasquaT. MatcovichL. MaurinQ. MeijerL. MereniG. MerinoM. MerzouguiB. MestichelliA. MianiC. MichelA. L. MillerE. MilottiV. MilottiY. MinenkovLl. M. MirL. MirasolaC. -A. MiritescuA. L. MitchellL. MobiliaM. MontaniA. Moreso SerraG. MorrasA. MoscatelloB. MoursC. M. Mow-LowryL. MuccilloF. MuciacciaD. NabariS. NadjiA. NagarD. Nanadoumgar-LacrozeV. NapolanoI. NardecchiaH. NarolaL. NaticchioniL. NegriA. NemmaniS. NissankeF. NoceraJ. NovakJ. F. Nuño SilesM. OertelG. OganesyanM. OrselliA. OuzriatC. PérigoisL. PaiellaM. A. PalaiaP. P. PalmaC. PalombaP. PaludP. T. H. PangF. PannaraleM. PanzeriF. PaolettiA. PaoloneL. PapaliniG. PapigkiotisA. PaquisA. ParisiD. PascucciA. PasqualettiR. PassaquietiD. PassuelloB. PatricelliA. PeregoG. PernaA. PerrecaJ. PerretS. PerrièsJ. W. PerryS. PetersC. PetrilloM. PiarulliL. PiccariM. PichotM. PiendibeneF. PiergiovanniL. PieriniG. PierraV. PierroM. PietrzakM. PillasL. PinardI. M. PintoM. PintoA. PlacidiE. PlacidiW. PlastinoR. PoggianiE. PoliniJ. PomperE. PorcelliE. K. PorterR. PoultonM. PracchiaT. PradierG. PrincipeG. A. ProdiP. ProsperiP. ProspositoP. PuppoG. QuéménerI. RainhoA. Ramos-BuadesP. RapagnaniM. RazzanoT. RegimbauA. I. RenziniB. RevenuA. Revilla PeñaL. RiccaF. RicciM. RicciA. RicciardoneS. RinaldiF. RobinetA. RocchiL. RollandR. RomanoA. Romero-RodríguezL. RosaD. RosińskaS. RoyD. RozzaP. RuggiE. Ruiz MoralesP. SaffariehT. SainratS. Sajith MenonO. S. SalafiaL. SalconiF. SalemiM. SalléS. SalvadorA. SamajdarN. Sanchis-GualF. SantoliquidoF. SarandreaA. SasliP. SassiB. SassolasS. SayahV. ScaccoS. SchmidtK. SchoutedenM. SchulzM. ScialpiM. Seglar-ArroyoJ. W. SeoV. SequinoM. SerraA. SevrinN. S. ShcheblanovL. SilenziL. SilvestriV. SipalaL. SmithS. Soares de Albuquerque FilhoV. SordiniF. SorrentinoF. SpadaV. SpagnuoloP. SpinicelliD. A. SteerJ. SteinlechnerS. SteinlechnerN. StergioulasP. StevensM. SuchenekS. SudhagarJ. SureshA. SvizzerettoB. L. SwinkelsA. SyxM. J. SzczepańczykP. SzewczykM. TaccaM. TagliazucchiI. Takimoto SchmiegelowN. TamaniniE. N. Tapia San MartínC. TarantoA. TheodoropoulosJ. TissinoP. TiwariE. TofaniM. ToffanoA. Torres-FornéI. Tosta e MeloE. TournefierM. Trad NeryA. TrapanantiR. TravagliniF. TravassoM. C. TringaliG. TroianA. TrovatoL. TrozzoK. TurbangM. TurconiC. TurskiH. UbachM. VacatelloM. ValentiniE. Vallejo-PagèsS. ValleroM. van DaelE. Van den BosscheJ. F. J. van den BrandC. Van Den BroeckM. van der KolkM. van der SluysA. Van de WalleJ. van DongenH. van HaevermaetJ. V. van HeijningenP. Van HoveN. van RemortelM. VardaroG. VedovatoS. VenikoudisP. VerdierM. VereeckenD. VerkindtF. VetranoA. VeutroA. ViceréN. Villanueva EspinosaJ. -Y. VinetS. ViretH. VoccaM. WasM. WilsJ. WoehlerI. C. F. WongT. WoutersM. WrightZ. WuN. YadavT. ZelenovaJ. -P. ZendriM. ZeoliM. ZerradY. ZhaoL. Zimmermannhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.30003v1The scalar--Maxwell--$Λ(x)$ system: Wormhole spacetimes without nonlinear electrodynamics in unimodular gravity2026-03-31T16:58:07ZIn General Relativity, constructing exact traversable wormholes coupled to electromagnetic fields typically requires complex Non-Linear Electrodynamics (NED). We demonstrate that Unimodular Gravity (UG) elegantly resolves this limitation. By relaxing energy-momentum conservation, UG introduces a dynamical cosmological term, $Λ(x)$, enabling a semi-classical energy exchange between matter and the vacuum. Exploiting this mechanism, we construct exact Scalar-Maxwell-$Λ(x)$ wormholes. We show that, provided the shape function $b(r)$ satisfies specific geometric conditions, these exact spacetimes can be fully supported by a phantom scalar field and standard linear Maxwell electrodynamics. This approach entirely bypasses NED, highlighting UG as a powerful framework for modeling non-trivial topologies with simplified, well-understood classical fields.2026-03-31T16:58:07Z10 pagesG. AlencarT. M. Crispimhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29996v1What does the Universe sound like?2026-03-31T16:57:10ZUnlike electromagnetic telescopes, gravitational-wave (GW) detectors cannot produce pretty pictures, but we can convert GW signals into sound. I compute what the Universe actually sounds like by averaging over $\sim10^6$ synthetic compact binary coalescence events occurring throughout 2026. The result: a soothing, low-frequency rumble, perfect for sleeping, meditation, or contemplating the violent nature of spacetime. This is the $Universal\ harmony$, audio file included!2026-03-31T16:57:10Z4 pages, 2 figures. April fool, but I hope you enjoy!Francesco Iacovellihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29991v1Waveform degeneracy of binary systems and Lagrange three-body systems2026-03-31T16:54:34ZA particular solution to the three-body problem is the circular Lagrange three-body system, where the masses move in circular orbits such that they always constitute an equilateral triangle. Such a system has been found to emit gravitational waves with a waveform similar to that of a binary system. In this work, we study the gravitational waveform degeneracy between quasi-circular binary systems and Lagrange three-body systems up to 0.5PN order. Assuming we know the parameters of a given binary system, we determine the parameters of the Lagrange triple that produces the same waveform as that of the binary. We show that there exists a mass quadrupole degeneracy in both the plus and cross modes, characterized by two parameters. We also find that there are binary systems and linearly stable Lagrange three-body systems that can have the same mass quadrupole waveform up to the coalescence time. In such cases, the normalized overlap of the waveforms with respect to the power spectral density of the advanced LIGO design remains above 0.97 as long as the binary has nearly symmetric masses. Beyond the mass quadrupole, there is a unique degeneracy at the 0.5PN. However, the Lagrange triple that satisfies this degeneracy is unstable.2026-03-31T16:54:34ZCarlos Jaimel DoctoleroIan Vega