https://arxiv.org/api/TclPGKM6ebee22OD+4Jp+MGTcDs 2026-06-17T08:53:58Z 4055 90 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05655v1 2026-06-04T03:35:14Z

The ratio of voting power between a permanent member and a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council varies substantially across indices: approximately 100 to 1 according to the Shapley-Shubik index, 10 to 1 according to the Banzhaf index, and 2.5 to 1 according to the Deegan-Packel index. Such comparisons depend on the choice of power index and are meaningful only in settings where players are divided into two types. To address these limitations, this paper proposes and characterizes a function that measures the level of power concentration in monotonic approval voting games. The proposed measure assigns a single value to each voting game, reflecting the extent to which voting power is unevenly distributed among players. The proposed measure is proportional to the sum of squared Deegan-Packel power indices and can also be interpreted as the degree of overlap among minimal winning coalitions. An application to the United Nations Security Council is also provided.

2026-06-04T03:35:14Z Takaaki Abe http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05582v1 2026-06-04T01:57:20Z

The weighted center of imputations (CIS) value allocates the surplus of the grand coalition equally after granting each player a fixed proportion of his individual worth. This paper provides three axiomatic characterizations of this value by generalizing the individual rationality and subgame order preservation axioms. The first characterization employs individual rationality with respect to the weights together with the equal surplus increment property. The second relies on efficiency, additivity, symmetry adjusted by the weights, and a dummifying player property adapted to the weights. The third builds on efficiency and a weak subgame order preservation axiom that incorporates the weights. These results unify and extend recent findings, covering both the equal division and the standard CIS values as special cases.

2026-06-04T01:57:20Z 13 Shan Erfang Liying Kang http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05554v1 2026-06-04T01:08:13Z

We provide a theorem on the role of risk and risk attitudes in macroeconomic models that clarifies and extends the Tallarini (2000) separation result. Under (1) separation of intertemporal and risk preferences, (2) separation of drivers of first and higher moments in the model primitives, and (3) approximate linearity of constraints, risk aversion and time-varying risk are irrelevant for the elasticity of any endogenous variable with respect to state variables that don't drive variation in higher moments. We discuss how models generate a more prominent role for risk by ``breaking'' or ``adapting'' to the assumptions in the theorem.

2026-06-04T01:08:13Z Andrew Chen Francisco Palomino http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19431v2 2026-06-03T23:57:44Z

Can wasteful money burning improve strategic communication? We show that it can, but only with intermediate commitment. In mediated communication with report-contingent burning, the mediator can use costly messages to discipline deviations and make persuasive messages credible. Under transparent motives, increasing the burning budget strictly raises the Sender's payoff once the budget is large enough, unless mediated communication with money burning collapses to cheap talk. With an unbounded budget, the value equals a robust Bayesian persuasion payoff, or equivalently the payoff of a cautious Sender. The framework clarifies commitment through smart contracts and Web 3.0 mediation.

2024-11-29T01:46:46Z Yi Liu Yang Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20617v3 2026-06-03T22:09:35Z

If AI displaces human workers faster than the economy can reabsorb them, it risks eroding the very consumer demand firms depend on. We show that knowing this is not enough for firms to stop it. In a competitive task-based model of a transitioning economy, each firm captures the full cost saving from automation but bears only a fraction of the demand loss it creates in the product market; the rest falls on rivals. This demand externality traps rational firms in an automation arms race, displacing workers well beyond what is collectively optimal. The resulting loss harms both workers and firm owners. More competition and ``better'' AI amplify the excess; wage adjustments and free entry cannot eliminate it. Neither can capital income taxes, worker equity, universal basic income, upskilling, or Coasean bargaining. A Pigouvian automation tax can. The results suggest that policy should address not only the aftermath of AI labor displacement but also the competitive incentives that drive it.

2026-03-21T03:25:10Z 63 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables Brett Hemenway Falk Gerry Tsoukalas http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05383v1 2026-06-03T19:36:37Z

Can artificial intelligence (AI) refute economic theory? I document experiments in which I asked several AI models (Gemini, Refine, Claude, and ChatGPT) to check the correctness of four published papers in economic theory, each containing an error that I helped identify or correct. ChatGPT Pro performed best, occasionally constructing counterexamples and corrected proofs, while other models fared worse. However, no model located a true error without substantial human guidance, and data contamination complicates interpretation. I argue that a competent human paired with a frontier model can outperform current peer review, but AI cannot yet refute economic theory on its own.

2026-06-03T19:36:37Z Alexis Akira Toda http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05163v1 2026-06-03T17:59:28Z

For a smooth pure exchange economy with fixed aggregate resources, we study two geometric conditions on the equilibrium manifold $E(r)$ endowed with the metric induced from its Euclidean ambient space. First, for arbitrary numbers of commodities and consumers, we prove that intrinsic flatness forces equilibrium prices to be locally constant. Together with Balasko's uniqueness--constancy criterion, this yields a necessary and sufficient condition: $E(r)$ is intrinsically flat if and only if the normalized equilibrium price is unique for every economy with aggregate resources $r$. This extends the curvature--uniqueness theorem of \cite{LoiMatta2018} and completes the higher-dimensional direction pursued in \cite{LoiMattaUccheddu2023}. Second, in the two-commodity case, we show that minimality of $E(r)$ already forces local constancy of the price map. Under the uniform-distribution interpretation of \cite{LoiMatta2021}, this gives the minimal-entropy/uniqueness equivalence without the additional asymptotic assumption used there. Both arguments rely on the same local parametrization of $E(r)$ and avoid the explicit construction of a normal frame.

2026-06-03T17:59:28Z 13 pages Andrea Loi Stefano Matta http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07991v3 2026-06-03T17:05:20Z

Standard decision theory seeks conditions under which a preference relation can be compressed into a single real-valued function. However, when preferences are incomplete or intransitive, a single function fails to capture the agent's evaluative structure. Recent literature on multi-utility representations suggests that such preferences are better represented by families of functions. This paper provides a canonical and intrinsic geometric characterization of this family. We construct the \textit{ledger group} $U(P)$, a partially ordered group that faithfully encodes the native structure of the agent's preferences in terms of trade-offs. We show that the set of all admissible utility functions is precisely the \textit{dual cone} $U^*$ of this structure. This perspective shifts the focus of utility theory from the existence of a specific map to the geometry of the measurement space itself. We demonstrate the power of this framework by explicitly reconstructing the standard multi-attribute utility representation as the intersection of the abstract dual cone with a subspace of continuous functionals, and showing the impossibility of this for a set of lexicographic preferences.

2025-12-08T19:22:25Z Significant gap in the literature review that calls into question the methodology of the paper Safal Raman Aryal http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05590v3 2026-06-03T15:49:47Z

A central tenet in mechanism design is the ability to irrevocably commit to a mechanism. Commitment is achieved by public declaration, letting players verify incentive properties in advance and the outcome in retrospect. However, public declaration can reveal superfluous information that is private to the mechanism designer, such as her target function or costs. We propose a new approach to commitment, and show how to commit to, and run, any given mechanism without disclosing it, while enabling the verification of incentive properties and the outcome -- all without any mediators. Our framework leverages zero-knowledge proofs -- a cornerstone of modern cryptographic theory.

2023-02-11T03:43:43Z Ran Canetti Amos Fiat Yannai A. Gonczarowski http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04959v1 2026-06-03T14:46:55Z

No deployed automated market maker lets its liquidity providers vote on the trading function. We show this is structural, not an oversight. On the weighted-product family with $n \geq 3$ assets, no aggregation rule is at once fair and strategy-proof. Arrovian fairness forces a unique form, the weighted Aitchison centroid, the weighted geometric mean of the providers' preferred pools. But fairness forces mean-type aggregation and strategy-proofness forces median-type, and the only rule that is both is a single-provider dictator. The obstruction is sharp: it vanishes at $n = 2$, where a fair strategy-proof rule exists. Under the Frongillo--Papireddygari--Waggoner equivalence, the centroid is Genest's logarithmic opinion pool, and the impossibility transfers to externally Bayesian pooling.

2026-06-03T14:46:55Z 52 pages Frank M. V. Feys http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11333v2 2026-06-03T13:10:36Z

To what extent can an external observer infer the underlying information structure from an equilibrium action distribution in an incomplete-information game? We investigate this question in a general linear-quadratic-Gaussian framework. A simple class of canonical information structures is offered and proves rich enough to rationalize any equilibrium action distribution that can arise under an arbitrary information structure. Moreover, this class is parsimonious in the sense that its relevant parameters are uniquely identified from an observed equilibrium outcome. We then show that a canonical information structure characterizes the lower bound on the amount by which each agent's signal can reduce the state variance, across all observationally equivalent information structures. This identified lower bound can in turn be used to predict equilibrium action volatility following changes in the payoff structure.

2024-03-17T20:25:38Z Masaki Miyashita http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21446v2 2026-06-02T16:20:40Z

We develop a continuous time discrete choice model of peer effects. The distinctive feature of the model is that agents might not consider all peers at the moment of making a decision. Instead, they select some of them on the basis of a mechanism that depends on recent choices. We characterize the equilibrium behavior and study the empirical content of the limited attention peer effect model. We allow changes in the choices of peers to affect both the set of peers to which the agent pays attention and her preferences over the alternatives. We exploit variation in choices together with variation in the size of the set of potential peers (or reference groups) to recover the preferences of the agents and the peer selection mechanisms. We apply our results to model expansion and contraction decisions by fast-food restaurants and find evidence of limited attention to actions of competitors.

2025-11-26T14:39:33Z Nail Kashaev Natalia Lazzati http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03587v1 2026-06-02T12:54:16Z

Many proof-of-stake protocols finance validator rewards from two sources: transaction fees and a finite reserve of tokens. This creates a dynamic hand-off problem. Early in the life of the system, fees may be too small to fund the target level of security; later, fees may become sufficient. The central question is whether the reserve provides enough runway for the protocol to remain secure until this fee-only region is reached. We study this problem in a discrete-time stochastic model of validator participation. Token price and transaction demand fluctuate over time, while validators choose participation strategically. We solve the validator entry game and derive an exact state-dependent reserve threshold, i.e., the minimal reserve stock necessary and sufficient to sustain a target security level. This threshold separates three regions: infeasibility, reserve-dependent security, and fee-only security. Security fails if the reserve first falls below the state-dependent threshold, and a successful hand-off occurs exactly if the fee-only region is reached before that failure time. We derive stress-test guarantees that convert lower confidence bands for token price and demand into reserve requirements, and obtain explicit failure-probability and expected hand-off-time bounds. Finally, we extend the model to forward-looking validators and derive the Markov participation condition that captures how current participation affects future reserve-funded rewards. The main implication is that reserve policy should not be evaluated by nominal depletion dates or steady-state reward ratios alone. A protocol can have a large nominal reserve and still be close to security failure after adverse price or demand shocks. Conversely, once demand crosses the fee-only threshold, the reserve becomes redundant for security. This paper provides a tractable equilibrium framework for stress-testing this transition.

2026-06-02T12:54:16Z Paolo Penna Manvir Schneider http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03548v1 2026-06-02T12:10:23Z

We study the robustness of AMM-based on-chain price oracles to strategic manipulation. An attacker trades against constant product automated market makers (CPMMs) to distort an on-chain oracle, arbitrageurs restore cross-pool and cross-venue consistency, and an oracle designer chooses how to aggregate pool quotes. Taking an efficient-market-hypothesis (EMH) view of the off-chain "true" price, we define the \emph{cost of manipulation} as the minimal mark-to-market loss that an attacker must incur to move the oracle by a given multiplicative factor. For independent CPMMs, we derive closed-form single-pool manipulation formulas and solve the attacker-designer game for weighted means and weighted medians, showing that liquidity weights maximize the minimum cost of manipulation within these classes for weighted medians (for any distortion level) and, for weighted means, locally as the distortion tends to zero. For larger distortions, weighted means become more fragile: optimal weights can depend on the target distortion and no single choice is uniformly optimal across distortion levels. In a frictionless CPMM model with cross-pool arbitrage, the manipulation cost depends only on the total quote depth and coincides across symmetric aggregators. We extend this framework to multi-asset star architectures, confirming that liquidity weights remain optimal in the same sense. Finally, we bridge theory and practice by incorporating dwell times and rate limits, providing a quantitative yardstick to size oracles against the explicit economic costs of attack.

2026-06-02T12:10:23Z Published at DeFi Workshop of FC'26 Sebastian Müller Nordine Moumeni Adel Messaoudi http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03527v1 2026-06-02T11:50:09Z

Advertisements often strategically disclose information to consumers who make decisions on further information acquisition and eventual purchase. Anderson and Renault (2006) model this problem using an information design framework, where the advertiser acts as a sender and the consumer as a receiver. We extend this model to a competitive setting with horizontally differentiated senders competing for a unit-demand receiver. Under costly inspection, the receiver's optimal sequential search action is given by Weitzman's Index Algorithm. We give a method, based on duality arguments, to verify whether a sender's given information strategy constitutes a best response against his competitors (other senders). We establish the existence of an equilibrium in the game among senders when the prior distributions have no mass; we also illustrate that such equilibria may exhibit intricate behaviors. Finally, we meticulously characterize symmetric equilibria played by the senders for cases when the prior distributions have monotone increasing densities, while offering economic intuitions behind the insightful equilibrium structure.

2026-06-02T11:50:09Z Zhicheng Du Hu Fu Ying Qin Zihe Wang