https://arxiv.org/api/NqN8L8rNhqLoqpiOa0W1yBpILkM 2026-03-22T10:27:58Z 3810 75 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07227v3 2026-03-06T04:38:51Z

Stablecoins have historically depegged due from par to large sales, possibly of speculative nature, or poor reserve asset quality. Using a global game which addresses both concerns, we show that the selling pressure on stablecoin holders increases in the presence of a large sale. While precise public knowledge reduces (increases) the probability of a run when fundamentals are strong (weak), interestingly, more precise private signals increase (reduce) the probability of a run when fundamentals are strong (weak), potentially explaining the stability of opaque stablecoins. The total run probability can be decomposed into components representing risks from large sales and poor collateral. By analyzing how these risk components vary with respect to information uncertainty and fundamentals, we can split the fundamental space into regions based on the type of risk a stablecoin issuer is more prone to. We suggest testable implications and connect our model's implications to real-world applications, including depegging events and the no-questions-asked property of money.

2024-07-23T19:37:02Z Brian Zhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15158v4 2026-03-05T21:37:41Z

We study the monotonicity of information costs: more informative experiments must be more costly. As criteria for informativeness, we consider the standard information orders introduced by Blackwell (1951, 1953) and Lehmann (1988). We provide simple necessary and sufficient conditions for a cost function to be monotone with respect to each order, grounded in their garbling characterizations. Finally, we examine several well-known cost functions from the literature through the lens of these conditions.

2024-04-23T15:59:51Z Xiaoyu Cheng Yonggyun Kim http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05660v1 2026-03-05T20:20:48Z

In priority-based matching, serial dictatorship (SD) is simple, strategyproof, and Pareto efficient, but not free of justified envy (i.e. fair). This paper studies how to fairly order agents in SD as a function of their priorities. I show that if preferences are identical across agents and uniformly distributed, and objects have unit capacities, the serial order that minimizes the expected number of justified envy cases is the Kemeny ranking of agents' priorities. If any of these assumptions -- identical preferences, uniformly distributed preferences, or unit capacities -- is relaxed, the optimal SD follows a weighted Kemeny ranking. Broadly, these results demonstrate how insights from social choice theory can inform the design of practical matching mechanisms.

2026-03-05T20:20:48Z Adam Hamdan http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05367v1 2026-03-05T16:44:54Z

We study how idiosyncratic firm-level shocks generate aggregate volatility and tail risk when they propagate through a production network under overlapping adjustment: new productivity draws arrive before the economy reaches the static equilibrium associated with earlier draws. Each innovation generates a `productivity wave' that mixes and dissipates over time as it travels through the production network. Macroeconomic fluctuations emerge from the interference between these waves of different vintages. The interference between these waves is governed by the dominant transient eigenvalue of the production network, and therefore so is the macroeconomic fluctuations they generate. In such a dynamic regime, the tail of the degree distribution is a markedly weaker determinant of macro fluctuations than in the fully adjusted static benchmark. And the macroeconomic significance of the degree-heterogeneity of production networks cannot be known without knowing the rate at which the economy converges to equilibrium or equivalently the spectral properties of the production network. More concretely, once we permit the time-averaging of shocks, granular shocks may account for only a small fraction of the empirically observed aggregate volatility.

2026-03-05T16:44:54Z Antoine Mandel Vipin P. Veetil http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06705v1 2026-03-05T15:17:46Z

Constructal Law states that a finite-size flow system that persists in time evolves its configuration so as to provide progressively easier access to the currents that flow through it. Classical Constructal theory derives hierarchical flow architectures from static resistance minimization under finite-size constraints, but many transport systems operate under irreversible limits that induce regime switching and discontinuous adjustment laws. We formulate Constructal evolution as an autonomous nonsmooth dynamical system. The architectural configuration is modeled as the state of a Filippov differential inclusion defined on a compact forward-invariant admissible set. Irreversible transport constraints generate switching manifolds across which the adjustment field is discontinuous. A resistance dissipation inequality encodes the Constructal principle of progressively improving access as a nonsmooth Lyapunov condition, while a uniform contraction assumption provides spectral bounds on the generalized Jacobians of the regime-dependent dynamics. Under these conditions we prove that the resulting inclusion admits a unique equilibrium architecture and that every admissible trajectory converges to it exponentially. Finite size, irreversibility, and resistance dissipation therefore imply existence, uniqueness, and global stability of persistent flow configurations without invoking static optimization. As an application, the classical area--to--point transport hierarchy of Bejan et. al. is embedded in the dynamical framework. The optimal assembly ratios appear as switching manifolds, while the classical scaling relations arise as sliding invariant sets of the Filippov inclusion. Their intersection defines the uniquely selected globally attracting architecture.

2026-03-05T15:17:46Z Pascal Stiefenhofer http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.06442v5 2026-03-05T15:05:10Z

The theory of Monotone Comparative Statics (MCS) has traditionally required a lattice structure, excluding certain multidimensional environments such as mixed-strategy games where this property fails. We show that this structure is not essential. We introduce a weaker notion, the pseudo-lattice property, and preserve the theory's core results by generalizing the MCS theorems for individual choice and Tarski's fixed-point theorem. Our framework expands comparative statics to pseudo quasi-supermodular games. Crucially, it enables the first MCS analysis of mixed-strategy Nash equilibria and trembling-hand perfect equilibria.

2019-11-15T01:44:20Z Yeon-Koo Che Jinwoo Kim Fuhito Kojima http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04345v1 2026-03-04T18:04:55Z

We study the design of fair allocation rules for the abatement of riparian pollution. To do so, we consider the so-called river pollution claims model, recently introduced by Yang et al. (2025) to distribute a budget of emissions permits among agents (cities, provinces, or countries) located along a river. In such a model, each agent has a claim reflecting population, emission history, and business-as-usual emissions, and the issue is to allocate among them a budget that is lower (or equal) than the aggregate claim. For environmental reasons, the specific location along the river where pollutants are emitted is an important concern (the more upstream the location is the higher the damage of polluting the river). We characterize a class of geometric rules that adjust proportional allocations to compromise between fairness and environmental concerns. Our class is an alternative to the one proposed by Yang et al. (2025). We compare both alternatives through an axiomatic study, as well as an illustration for the case study of the Tuojiang Basin in China.

2026-03-04T18:04:55Z Ricardo Martinez Juan D. Moreno-Ternero http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04226v1 2026-03-04T16:08:22Z

We study infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) where the decision maker evaluates each of her strategies by aggregating the infinite stream of expected stage-rewards. The crucial feature of our approach is that the aggregation is performed by means of a given diffuse charge (a diffuse finitely additive probability measure) on the set of stages. The results of Neyman [2023] imply that in this setting, in every MDP with finite state and action spaces, the decision maker has a pure optimal strategy as long as the diffuse charge satisfies the time value of money principle. His result raises the question of existence of an optimal strategy without additional assumptions on the aggregation charge. We answer this question in the negative with a counterexample. With a delicately constructed aggregation charge, the MDP has no optimal strategy at all, neither pure nor randomized.

2026-03-04T16:08:22Z János Flesch Arkadi Predtetchinski William D Sudderth Xavier Venel http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04173v1 2026-03-04T15:28:50Z

We study how to allocate resources to participants who can strategically misrepresent their deservingness at a cost. A principal assigns item(s) (or money) among multiple agents on the basis of their costly signals. Each agent's signal reflects their private type in the absence of misrepresentation but can be inflated above their true type at a cost. The principal is a social planner who aims to maximize the weighted average of matching efficiency and a utilitarian objective. Strategic misrepresentation introduces novel incentive-compatibility constraints, under which we characterize the optimal mechanism. We apply our characterization to two kinds of markets, distinguished by resource scarcity, and show that the principal strictly benefits from randomizing the allocations based on costly signals when the population of participants is large enough. Interestingly, in large markets with scarce resources, the format of the optimal mechanism converges to a winner-takes-all contest; however, there is a non-diminishing value in randomizing allocations to middle types as the population of participants grows.

2026-03-04T15:28:50Z Yingkai Li Xiaoyun Qiu http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10900v2 2026-03-04T13:15:15Z

The classical theory of efficient allocations of an aggregate endowment in a pure-exchange economy has hitherto primarily focused on the Pareto-efficiency of allocations, under the implicit assumption that transfers between agents are frictionless, and hence costless to the economy. In this paper, we argue that certain transfers cause frictions that result in costs to the economy. We show that these frictional costs are tantamount to a form of subadditivity of the cost of transferring endowments between agents. We suggest an axiomatic study of allocation mechanisms, that is, the mechanisms that transform feasible allocations into other feasible allocations, in the presence of such transfer costs. Among other results, we provide an axiomatic characterization of those allocation mechanisms that admit representations as robust (worst-case) linear allocation mechanisms, as well as those mechanisms that admit representations as worst-case conditional expectations. We call the latter Robust Conditional Mean Allocation mechanisms, and we relate our results to the literature on (decentralized) risk sharing within a pool of agents.

2024-04-16T20:40:32Z Mario Ghossoub Giulio Principi Ruodu Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17301v2 2026-03-04T01:51:01Z

We study price regulation for a monopolist operating in networked markets with demand spillovers. Achieving efficiency requires price reductions proportional to consumers' Katz-Bonacich centralities, which generally cannot be implemented by commonly used price regulations. Moreover, these regulations become asymptotically welfare neutral as spillovers grow. Nevertheless, some price regulations may still benefit consumers. In particular, average-price regulation robustly increases consumer surplus. By contrast, banning price discrimination increases consumer surplus only when more central consumers have higher intrinsic willingness to pay.

2025-08-24T11:08:18Z Chengqing Li Junjie Zhou http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12934v2 2026-03-03T20:18:30Z

Contest success function (CSF) maps contestants' efforts to their winning probability. This paper provides axiomatizations of CSFs with headstarts. The results extend the classic axiomatization of the Tullock CSF and connect to CSFs that allow for draws. The central axiom is relative homogeneity of counterfactual deviation, which requires the pairwise influence of one contestant's effort on opponent's probabilistic allocation to be scale-invariant. Two fairness axioms and no advantageous reallocation further restrict the admissible functional forms with headstarts. We also introduce dummy consistency, requiring allocations to be consistent with and without inactive contestants, to clarify the relationship with earlier axiomatic work that rules out headstarts. Finally, we discuss an extension that drops the assumption of full allocation.

2025-08-18T14:03:03Z Hao Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12725v2 2026-03-03T17:47:14Z

We explore the behaviour emerging from learning agents repeatedly interacting strategically for a wide range of learning dynamics, including $Q$-learning, projected gradient, replicator and log-barrier dynamics. Going beyond the better understood classes of potential games and zero-sum games, we consider the setting of a general repeated game with finite recall under different forms of monitoring. We obtain a Folk Theorem-style result and characterise the set of payoff vectors that can be obtained by these dynamics, discovering a wide range of possibilities for the emergence of algorithmic collusion. Achieving this requires a novel technical approach, which, to the best of our knowledge, yields the first convergence result for multi-agent $Q$-learning algorithms in repeated games.

2024-11-19T18:45:55Z This is a new version of a previous paper by the title "Reinforcement Learning, Collusion, and the Folk Theorem" by the three (alphabetically) first authors Galit Askenazi-Golan Domenico Mergoni Cecchelli Edward Plumb Clemens Possnig http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19276v2 2026-03-03T15:55:29Z

We introduce a new paradigm for risk sharing that generalizes earlier models based on discrete agents and extends them to allow for sharing risk within a continuum of agents. Agents are represented by points of a measure space and have potentially heterogeneous risk preferences modeled by risk measures on a separable probability space. We derive the dual representation of the value function using a Strassen-type theorem for the weak-star topology and provide a characterization of the acceptance set using Aumann integration. These results are illustrated by explicit formulas when risk preferences are within the family of entropic and expected shortfall risk measures, and applications to Pareto efficiency in large markets.

2025-05-25T19:17:53Z Vasily Melnikov http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12366v3 2026-03-03T15:51:24Z

We study how market segmentation affects consumers when a monopolist can adjust both prices and product qualities across segments, engaging in second- and third-degree price discrimination simultaneously. We characterize the consumer-optimal segmentation and show that it has a striking structure: consumers with the same value receive the same quality in every segment, though prices differ. Under mild conditions, any segmentation harms consumers if and only if demand is more elastic than a cost-determined threshold. Hence, potential benefits for consumers depend critically on cost and demand elasticities. These findings have implications for regulatory policy regarding price discrimination and market segmentation.

2024-01-22T21:35:13Z Dirk Bergemann Tibor Heumann Michael C. Wang