https://arxiv.org/api//f3HF9CogL7AoZpCo7+0IcQAn8I 2026-09-11T21:04:16Z 4354 60 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02773v1 2026-09-02T16:07:52Z

Extending the Price-and-Choose (P&C) mechanism of Echenique and Nunez (2025), we propose the Price-Accept-and-Choose (PA&C) mechanism, which preserves efficiency while eliminating P&C's first-mover advantage. We then analyze randomized and bidding variants and show that the resulting equilibrium payoffs correspond to standard solutions in transferable utility games: the Center of the Imputation Set value for P&C and the Shapley value for PA&C. In the randomized variants, these solutions arise in expectation; in the bidding variants, they are implemented on every equilibrium path. We further relate other efficient designs, such as balanced VCG payments, to additional solution concepts, forging an interpretable bridge between implementation theory and cooperative game theory.

2026-09-02T16:07:52Z Yukihiko Funaki Yukio Koriyama Matias Nunez Giacomo Rostagno http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18735v3 2026-09-02T15:45:37Z

I develop a model of learning-by-doing and course design, and use it to study the impacts of artificial intelligence (AI). A myopic student faces a sequence of tasks that he can work on or delegate to AI. Work requires costly effort but builds skill; delegation requires no effort but builds no skill. A teacher designs the task sequence ("course") to maximize the student's skill development, given his choices to work or delegate. Without AI, the teacher makes earlier tasks more effort-intensive and later tasks more skill-intensive. With AI, the teacher must redesign early tasks to induce effort, leading to less skill development. If AI complements effort, then improvements in AI quality make high-skill students learn faster but low-skill students learn slower.

2026-07-21T05:46:28Z 59 pages, 8 figures. v3 makes cosmetic changes Benjamin Davies http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13137v12 2026-09-02T15:16:18Z

A data broker repeatedly negotiates with a producer who has privately known production costs and values consumer data for price discrimination. The broker cannot commit to future offers. When he can offer rich menus of dataset--price pairs, the unique equilibrium outcome immediately implements the commitment-optimal mechanism, so limited commitment is irrelevant. When he can offer only a single dataset--price pair at a time, by contrast, we obtain a folk theorem. There is always an equilibrium in which the market clears immediately at a low price, while, when the parties are sufficiently patient, any payoff between this benchmark and the commitment payoff can be sustained. This multiplicity rests on a property specific to data: free disposal by the producer and zero marginal cost of provision make the efficient dataset for a given type nonunique, leaving the broker credible flexibility over future offers. Equilibrium multiplicity is therefore an economic prediction of the model, with identical fundamentals supporting persistently different negotiated outcomes.

2025-07-17T13:59:01Z Zihao Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02357v1 2026-09-02T09:28:42Z

We study a network formation game in which agents sponsor links at a linear cost in order to maximize centrality, defined as a weighted sum of walk counts with positive and weakly decreasing weights. This class includes Katz Bonacich centrality and total communicability and captures environments in which access decays with distance. Our main result is a sharp equilibrium characterization: every Nash equilibrium network is core periphery, meaning there exists a set $C$ such that every node is linked to every node in $C$, and there are no other edges. The driving force is that linking to better connected agents generates many additional short connections at once, so incentives concentrate links on a dense subset. Finally, we show that the welfare maximizing network is always either empty or complete.

2026-09-02T09:28:42Z Itai Arieli João Correia-da-Silva Wade Hann-Caruthers Anna Rubinchik http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01595v1 2026-09-01T17:57:50Z

We develop a framework for mechanism design with AI agents whose alignment (preferences) and capabilities (feasible actions and information) are unknown. We want such agents to act on our behalf so mechanisms must incentivize both honesty and obedience. A one-sided imitation structure---capabilities can be concealed but not counterfeited---yields a revelation principle, a characterization of implementable policies via nested cyclical monotonicity, and conditions under which eliciting higher-order beliefs can discipline multiple agents. We apply our framework to stylized examples of (i) sandbagging in which a more capable agent pretends to be less capable; (ii) an alignment--interpretability trade-off, where the two are substitutes in the instrument but complements in value; (iii) discipline via peer scoring; (iv) coupling rewards to induce competition among multiple agents; and (v) scalable oversight and reward shaping.

2026-09-01T17:57:50Z Dirk Bergemann Andrew Koh Stephen Morris http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20152v3 2026-09-01T17:48:44Z

Standard dynamical systems approaches to economic modeling, such as those deriving the Cobb-Douglas and CES production functions from exponential growth trajectories, typically rely on integer-order differential equations. While effective, these models assume that economic output depends solely on the instantaneous state of capital and labor, effectively ignoring the long-term ``memory effects'' inherent in policy, infrastructure, and technological adoption. This paper extends the exponential framework by introducing the Caputo fractional derivative into the underlying dynamical systems governing factor inputs. By replacing standard growth rates with fractional-order counterparts of order $0 < α\le 1$, we model economic trajectories where the rate of change is a non-local function of the system's entire history. We demonstrate that the Mittag-Leffler function emerges as the natural growth solution in this context, providing a nested generalization of the classical exponential model. Unlike exogenous fractional frameworks, we use this fractional approach to derive a new class of time-independent invariants that serve as generalized production functions. We show that as the fractional order approaches unity, these forms converge exactly to the classical Cobb-Douglas function.

2026-05-19T17:41:43Z Roman G. Smirnov http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07671v2 2026-09-01T16:28:25Z

An agent's probability report is paid for twice: by a strictly proper scoring rule, and by an approval rule for the decision it triggers. In this classical decision-coupled setting, non-affine approval is known to defeat truthful reporting. We show the conflict is endogenous: when feasible, the welfare-maximizing approval rule is never affine. The distortion, however, is predictable and can be designed around. There is a reserve report at which pretending to be the marginal type costs exactly the approval prize. Approving at or above the reserve screens types perfectly under every strictly proper score, and the reserve does not depend on the type distribution. A Lipschitz rule with a single kink attains first-best exactly; under strict feasibility no continuously differentiable rule does. The binding constraint is steepness, not smoothness. First-best is attainable within a slope budget if and only if the budget is at least the critical slope: the steepest chord of the pretending cost up to the reserve. Below it the welfare loss is cubic in the shortfall. Where the pretending cost is convex up to the reserve, as for Brier, log and power scores, the critical slope is closed-form. The instances are AI-agent oversight and marketplace operation.

2026-05-08T12:42:28Z 38 pages, no figures. Targeting ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation (TEAC); preprint Lauri Lovén Sasu Tarkoma http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01489v1 2026-09-01T16:21:47Z

We characterise the division rules for claims problems that satisfy equal treatment of equals, bilateral consistency, composition down, and composition up. The rules are precisely the members of a one-parameter log-exponential family $\{r^θ\}_{θ\in[-\infty,+\infty]}$, with constrained equal awards (CEA) and constrained equal losses (CEL) as its endpoints. For finite $θ$, $r^θ$ is the equal-sacrifice rule in awards for $u_θ=\log\varphi_θ$, where \[ \varphi_θ(x):=\frac{e^{θx}-1}θ\quad(θ\ne0), \qquad \varphi_0(x):=x, \] and simultaneously the equal-sacrifice rule in losses for the dual utility $u_{-θ}$. The proportional rule is the midpoint, $θ=0$. Continuity of the rules are not assumed but a consequence of the other axioms.

2026-09-01T16:21:47Z Christoph Schlegel http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01468v1 2026-09-01T16:04:16Z

The paper explores a theoretical freemium model for the sale of information, drawing on mathematical tools used in the study of repeated zero-sum games and Bayesian persuasion. Unlike standard Bayesian persuasion models, the information seller (IS) is indifferent to the actions taken by the information buyer (IB) and is concerned solely with maximizing the revenue from selling information. Offering some information for free may increase the IB's willingness to pay for additional information. The information that the IB seeks is about the state of the world. Initially, the IB only knows the prior distribution over possible states. The IS supplies both free and paid information through signals whose state-dependent distributions determine the IB's posterior via Bayes' rule. The IB's utility is a function of the posterior. An optimal free signal is one that maximizes the IS's expected revenue from the subsequent paid signal. That revenue is equal to the IB's expected utility gain when moving from the posterior induced by the free signal to that induced by the paid signal. The paper characterizes the optimal free and paid signals and derives a formula for the maximal revenue in terms of the IB's utility function. It shows that a revenue gain for the IS from the provision of free information is accompanied by a loss to the IB. Whether free information can increase the IS's revenue depends on the form of the IB's utility function. In the two-state case, that dependence is fully characterized. In the general case, only necessary conditions are obtained. In particular, if the IB's utility function is convex, the IS can never profit from providing free information. This occurs, in particular, when the IB uses the information to solve a decision problem. By contrast, when the IB is engaged in a strategic interaction with a third party, the IS may benefit from providing free information.

2026-09-01T16:04:16Z Igal Milchtaich http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02787v2 2026-09-01T14:20:41Z

Understanding the evolutionary stability of cooperation is a central problem in biology, sociology, and economics. There exist only a few known mechanisms that guarantee the existence of cooperation and its robustness to cheating. Here, we introduce a mechanism for the emergence of cooperation in the presence of fluctuations. We consider agents whose wealth changes stochastically in a multiplicative fashion. Each agent can share part of her wealth as a public good, which is equally distributed among all the agents. We show that, when agents operate with long-time horizons, cooperation produces an advantage at the individual level, as it effectively screens agents from the deleterious effect of environmental fluctuations.

2022-02-06T14:51:58Z 5 pages, 2 figures Fant, L., Mazzarisi, O., Panizon, E., & Grilli, J. (2023). Stable cooperation emerges in stochastic multiplicative growth. Physical Review E, 108(1), L012401 Lorenzo Fant Onofrio Mazzarisi Emanuele Panizon Jacopo Grilli 10.1103/PhysRevE.108.L012401 http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14686v5 2026-09-01T07:37:54Z

A principal and an agent divide a surplus whose size is known only to the agent. The agent decides how much to reveal initially. Both parties can acquire costly evidence to verify the surplus. The agent's liability is bounded by the revealed surplus. The principal commits to their own acquisition-effort and to transfers contingent on who provides evidence. With these instruments, the principal simultaneously motivates the agent to reveal the surplus and to acquire evidence. We characterize optimal mechanisms using a novel technique that is based on reforming existing mechanisms and orders the instruments. It applies to related multi-instrument problems.

2025-01-24T18:01:16Z Deniz Kattwinkel Justus Preusser http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00799v1 2026-09-01T06:51:47Z

This paper examines how outside options are incorporated into payoff distributions in games with coalition structures. We introduce and characterize the alpha-value, which "fully" incorporates outside options, and provide a new characterization of the Aumann-Dreze value as an allocation rule that does not incorporate outside options. We show that the chi-value (Casajus, 2009) is a component-wise convex combination of these two values and thus incorporates outside options in a discounted form.

2026-09-01T06:51:47Z Takaaki Abe http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06363v4 2026-08-31T22:51:06Z

Persistence models often conflate propagation, survival, and cross-scale loss. The Replicator-Optimization Mechanism (ROM) is a replicator-mutator template separating baseline weight, bounded survival, and a transfer kernel at a declared scale. Its equation conserves mass but guarantees neither invariance, convergence, a potential, nor a preferred scale. For finite static density-independent continuous time, an irreducible weighted kernel yields a unique positive Perron-Frobenius composition; discrete-time power convergence needs primitivity. The componentwise ranking proved here is guaranteed under exact uniform-residual transfer. Strong lumpability gives universal first-order transfer closure, and blockwise effective fitness gives an exact quotient. An institutional instantiation uses normalized stakes, signed preference-decision alignment, information loss, and descriptive effective voice. It specifies conditional survival, not legitimacy or normative authority. A companion mixed-motive MARL battery reports exploratory evidence against the implemented proxy ratio in its environment: a positive signed target-coordinate-correlation effect survives held-out evaluation under shared-state contention, while a reduced feasible-centred frozen-policy crossing reverses the predicted correlation-noise interaction. The treatment varies ideal-point correlation inside a fixed reward family, not objective- or reward-function alignment. Lean checks mapped algebraic identities and scalar monotonicities, not the stationary theorem, empirical mapping, or normative bridge. ROM is an assumptions ledger and model-construction discipline, not a cross-substrate law.

2026-01-10T00:16:10Z 36 pages. Reader-facing revision preserving the ROM equation, kernel triple, identification transformation, exact lumpability results, reversibility/current distinction, and scoped Lean map. Included in the source package is anc/technical-supplement_ROM.pdf Murad Farzulla http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00380v1 2026-08-31T21:11:54Z

Limited attention forces organizations to decide not only how much to discuss, but also which issues merit discussion. We study strategic communication about a multidimensional decision when a receiver can respond only along a few endogenously chosen issues. Players agree on the ideal action but prioritize different errors. In equilibrium, communicated and omitted issues must be statistically unrelated and separable according to the sender's preferences. Thus, the sender's priorities determine the agenda; the receiver's do not. Synchronized priorities raise the receiver's best equilibrium payoff but lower his worst, so he may prefer a less synchronized sender.

2026-08-31T21:11:54Z Elliot Lipnowski Doron Ravid http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00205v3 2026-08-30T20:14:04Z

Search and matching increasingly take place on online platforms with elements of centralized and decentralized matching. Platforms can alter the search process for users, but cannot eliminate search frictions entirely. I study a model where users pay to change the distribution of potential partners they search over and characterize the revenue-maximizing platform when match characteristics are private information. With complementary match characteristics, I show that the only possible source of inefficiency on the optimal platform is exclusion, unlike standard screening problems. Matching on the optimal platform is perfectly assortative --- there is no equilibrium mismatch. This conclusion is robust to various manners in which fees are collected (e.g. subscription fees or match fees), and to environments where the platform designer can also change search speeds.

2025-04-30T22:10:52Z Cole Wittbrodt