https://arxiv.org/api//f3HF9CogL7AoZpCo7+0IcQAn8I 2026-06-13T14:39:56Z 4046 60 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07445v1 2026-06-05T16:47:23Z

This paper presents an open-economy macroeconomic equilibrium model for Proof-of-Stake (PoS) networks with fee-burn mechanics (EIP-1559) that formalizes the strategic interplay between a Kelly-optimizing rational institutional investor and a utility-driven retail consumer. We analyze network dynamics across two behavioral regimes. In The Unbounded Accumulation Model, the consumer purely accumulates tokens, creating an exclusive buy-side pressure that interacts with institutional portfolio rebalancing to fuel an ever-expanding speculative bubble and generate compounding excess returns for investors. Conversely, in The Utility-Consumption Model, the consumer dynamically buys and sells tokens to balance crypto wealth against real-world fiat consumption. Within this framework, we derive an explicit steady-state equilibrium price for ETH, demonstrating how token valuation anchors to a stable fundamental baseline that scales directly with network adoption while completely dissolving the institutional yield premium. Our numerical simulations show that while exogenous traditional finance (TradFi) shocks propagate through portfolio rebalancing to drive high token price volatility, network inflation remains highly stable. Furthermore, we prove that network security is insulated from institutional monopoly by counter-cyclical consumer behavior. Our findings reveal that institutional excess wealth creation in PoS ecosystems is not native to the staking protocol itself, but is strictly driven by the leveraged extraction of the retail consumer's continuous demand for transactional utility.

2026-06-05T16:47:23Z Mikhail Perepelitsa http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16071v3 2026-06-05T15:32:14Z

We provide interpretable axiomatic foundations for utilities used in network games and identify several principled generalizations. First, we demonstrate that a ubiquitous feature of network games, bilateral strategic interactions, is equivalent to having player utilities that are additively separable across opponents. Common utilities based on a linear aggregate of opponent actions are strategically equivalent to additively separable utilities. Moreover, assuming real-valued actions, we show that a constant rate of substitution between opponents implies a utility that is linear in opponent actions. Finally, we identify precise conditions--linear best replies and midpoint indifference--that pin down the classic linear-quadratic utility.

2026-02-17T22:54:39Z Joseph Root Evan Sadler http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28026v5 2026-06-05T10:41:00Z

Building on the $f$-information model of Bloedel et al. (2025), this paper introduces a one-parameter family of information acquisition models and characterizes optimal information acquisition. This family extends the mutual information model (Matějka and McKay, 2015) while preserving its analytical tractability. The information cost is derived from the $α$-divergence, which nests the KL-divergence ($α=-1$), the reverse KL-divergence ($α=1$), and the squared Hellinger distance ($α=0$), and is represented in closed form via the $α$-integration of Amari (2007). The optimal choice probabilities belong to the $q$-exponential family, which appears in nonextensive statistical mechanics (Tsallis, 1988) and in the $q$-logit model of traffic route choice (Nakayama, 2013). This family reduces to the modified logit in the mutual information case (Matějka and McKay, 2015). We further show that the relationship between payoffs and the set of actions chosen with positive probability in each state changes qualitatively across ranges of $α$.

2026-05-27T06:31:13Z Preliminary version. Comments are welcome Takashi Ui http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01018v2 2026-06-05T02:39:35Z

This study examines the role of self-duality in the axiomatization of the Shapley-Shubik power index. We show that, when self-duality is imposed, the transfer axiom can be weakened to a restricted version requiring transfer only among voting games with no veto player. This result shows that self-duality can partially substitute for the transfer axiom.

2026-05-31T05:22:24Z Small changes in wording Takaaki Abe http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06700v1 2026-06-04T20:39:32Z

Proof-of-work (PoW) blockchains rely on computational expenditure to secure a ledger supporting a native cryptocurrency. In existing systems such as Bitcoin, this expenditure is intentionally useless: the computation secures consensus but produces no external economic output. An emerging alternative -- proof of useful work (PoUW) -- enables the same computation to simultaneously secure the blockchain and generate economically valuable output. However, PoUW is often criticized on economic grounds: if the work is useful, attackers might be "paid to attack," potentially weakening security. We develop a competitive-equilibrium model of a PoUW blockchain in which compute can be allocated across pure mining, pure useful work -- instantiated as machine-learning inference -- or "duplex" work that produces both with computational overheads. We provide a complete closed-form characterization of equilibrium allocations and prices as a function of the duplex overheads and a single economic parameter -- the token-inference ratio -- measuring token adoption relative to the inference market. This characterization reveals three regimes: "Bitconia," in which the economy reduces to classical PoW; "Fortessia," in which duplex replaces mining, increasing security while useful output remains unchanged; and "Duplexia," in which token rewards subsidize inference, lowering prices and expanding inference supply. Contrary to the common strawman argument, PoUW does not make attacks economically cheap: once equilibrium prices are taken into account, the economic cost of a majority attack remains tied to the block reward. Moreover, in Duplexia, block rewards act as rebates on inference prices, generating additional socially useful computation that would not arise without the blockchain -- an expansion monotonically increasing in token adoption and technological efficiency.

2026-06-04T20:39:32Z Rafael Pass http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06059v1 2026-06-04T11:59:44Z

We study the division of a heterogeneous good between two agents into contiguous bundles, each defined by a starting location and a quantity, in a purely ordinal framework that does not rely on cardinal valuations. We introduce a general class of monotonic preferences representable by indifference curves. We show that an allocation is Pareto efficient and envy-free if and only if it lies in a specific ``balanced region'', implying that an equal split is fair only when it belongs to this region. We further show that no rule can simultaneously satisfy Pareto efficiency, envy-freeness, and strategy-proofness.

2026-06-04T11:59:44Z Mihir Bhattacharya Ojasvi Khare http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01421v8 2026-06-04T07:11:15Z

In many choice settings the decision maker (DM) adopts a criterion which is a mediation between her preference, and its opposite. According to such compromise, the first i alternatives on top of the DM's taste are moved, in reverse order, to the bottom. This pattern allows to define the compromise-based degree of irrationality, which quantifies the extent of the mediation embraced by the DM in her choice. Necessary and sufficient conditions characterizing this index are singled out. I investigate non rationalizable choices that display the lowest degree of irrationality, and I fully identify the preferences that explain the DM's picks by a minimal mediation between opposite judgments. These datasets account for some well known selection biases, such as second-best procedures, and the handicapped avoidance. I offer a simple characterization of the choice behavior that exhibits the most severe compromise, and I show that this subclass comprises almost all choices. Finally, some alternative measures of compromise are characterized, and compared with the score previously determined.

2026-01-04T07:55:16Z arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2408.01317 Angelo Enrico Petralia http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05655v1 2026-06-04T03:35:14Z

The ratio of voting power between a permanent member and a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council varies substantially across indices: approximately 100 to 1 according to the Shapley-Shubik index, 10 to 1 according to the Banzhaf index, and 2.5 to 1 according to the Deegan-Packel index. Such comparisons depend on the choice of power index and are meaningful only in settings where players are divided into two types. To address these limitations, this paper proposes and characterizes a function that measures the level of power concentration in monotonic approval voting games. The proposed measure assigns a single value to each voting game, reflecting the extent to which voting power is unevenly distributed among players. The proposed measure is proportional to the sum of squared Deegan-Packel power indices and can also be interpreted as the degree of overlap among minimal winning coalitions. An application to the United Nations Security Council is also provided.

2026-06-04T03:35:14Z Takaaki Abe http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05582v1 2026-06-04T01:57:20Z

The weighted center of imputations (CIS) value allocates the surplus of the grand coalition equally after granting each player a fixed proportion of his individual worth. This paper provides three axiomatic characterizations of this value by generalizing the individual rationality and subgame order preservation axioms. The first characterization employs individual rationality with respect to the weights together with the equal surplus increment property. The second relies on efficiency, additivity, symmetry adjusted by the weights, and a dummifying player property adapted to the weights. The third builds on efficiency and a weak subgame order preservation axiom that incorporates the weights. These results unify and extend recent findings, covering both the equal division and the standard CIS values as special cases.

2026-06-04T01:57:20Z 13 Shan Erfang Liying Kang http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05554v1 2026-06-04T01:08:13Z

We provide a theorem on the role of risk and risk attitudes in macroeconomic models that clarifies and extends the Tallarini (2000) separation result. Under (1) separation of intertemporal and risk preferences, (2) separation of drivers of first and higher moments in the model primitives, and (3) approximate linearity of constraints, risk aversion and time-varying risk are irrelevant for the elasticity of any endogenous variable with respect to state variables that don't drive variation in higher moments. We discuss how models generate a more prominent role for risk by ``breaking'' or ``adapting'' to the assumptions in the theorem.

2026-06-04T01:08:13Z Andrew Chen Francisco Palomino http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19431v2 2026-06-03T23:57:44Z

Can wasteful money burning improve strategic communication? We show that it can, but only with intermediate commitment. In mediated communication with report-contingent burning, the mediator can use costly messages to discipline deviations and make persuasive messages credible. Under transparent motives, increasing the burning budget strictly raises the Sender's payoff once the budget is large enough, unless mediated communication with money burning collapses to cheap talk. With an unbounded budget, the value equals a robust Bayesian persuasion payoff, or equivalently the payoff of a cautious Sender. The framework clarifies commitment through smart contracts and Web 3.0 mediation.

2024-11-29T01:46:46Z Yi Liu Yang Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20617v3 2026-06-03T22:09:35Z

If AI displaces human workers faster than the economy can reabsorb them, it risks eroding the very consumer demand firms depend on. We show that knowing this is not enough for firms to stop it. In a competitive task-based model of a transitioning economy, each firm captures the full cost saving from automation but bears only a fraction of the demand loss it creates in the product market; the rest falls on rivals. This demand externality traps rational firms in an automation arms race, displacing workers well beyond what is collectively optimal. The resulting loss harms both workers and firm owners. More competition and ``better'' AI amplify the excess; wage adjustments and free entry cannot eliminate it. Neither can capital income taxes, worker equity, universal basic income, upskilling, or Coasean bargaining. A Pigouvian automation tax can. The results suggest that policy should address not only the aftermath of AI labor displacement but also the competitive incentives that drive it.

2026-03-21T03:25:10Z 63 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables Brett Hemenway Falk Gerry Tsoukalas http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05383v1 2026-06-03T19:36:37Z

Can artificial intelligence (AI) refute economic theory? I document experiments in which I asked several AI models (Gemini, Refine, Claude, and ChatGPT) to check the correctness of four published papers in economic theory, each containing an error that I helped identify or correct. ChatGPT Pro performed best, occasionally constructing counterexamples and corrected proofs, while other models fared worse. However, no model located a true error without substantial human guidance, and data contamination complicates interpretation. I argue that a competent human paired with a frontier model can outperform current peer review, but AI cannot yet refute economic theory on its own.

2026-06-03T19:36:37Z Alexis Akira Toda http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03766v4 2026-06-03T19:03:55Z

Many of the world's renewable resources are in decline. Optimal harvests with smooth recruitment is well studied but in recent years, ecologists have concluded that tipping points in recruitment are common. Recruitment with a tipping point has low-fecundity below the tipping point and high-fecundity above. When the discounted value of high-fecundity is sufficiently high, there is a high-fecundity steady-state. This steady-state is stable but in some cases, small perturbations may result in large, temporary reductions in recruitment and harvests. Below the tipping point, a low-fecundity steady-state need not exist. When a low-fecundity steady-state does exist, there is an endogenous tipping (Skiba) point: below, harvests converge to the low-fecundity steady-state and above, an austere harvest policy transitions the renewable resource to high-fecundity recruitment. If there is hysteresis in recruitment, the high steady-state may not be stable. Moreover, if the high-/low-fecundity differential is large then following a downward perturbation, fecundity optimally remains low.

2025-04-02T20:36:21Z added more expansive discussion of existing literature Ted To http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05163v1 2026-06-03T17:59:28Z

For a smooth pure exchange economy with fixed aggregate resources, we study two geometric conditions on the equilibrium manifold $E(r)$ endowed with the metric induced from its Euclidean ambient space. First, for arbitrary numbers of commodities and consumers, we prove that intrinsic flatness forces equilibrium prices to be locally constant. Together with Balasko's uniqueness--constancy criterion, this yields a necessary and sufficient condition: $E(r)$ is intrinsically flat if and only if the normalized equilibrium price is unique for every economy with aggregate resources $r$. This extends the curvature--uniqueness theorem of \cite{LoiMatta2018} and completes the higher-dimensional direction pursued in \cite{LoiMattaUccheddu2023}. Second, in the two-commodity case, we show that minimality of $E(r)$ already forces local constancy of the price map. Under the uniform-distribution interpretation of \cite{LoiMatta2021}, this gives the minimal-entropy/uniqueness equivalence without the additional asymptotic assumption used there. Both arguments rely on the same local parametrization of $E(r)$ and avoid the explicit construction of a normal frame.

2026-06-03T17:59:28Z 13 pages Andrea Loi Stefano Matta