https://arxiv.org/api/eTSBEBa3D+vTxFA9uBmmOyD+HRg 2026-03-20T14:24:07Z 3810 45 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10867v1 2026-03-11T15:18:32Z

A designer relies on an experimenter to provide information to a decision maker, but the experimenter has incentives to persuade rather than merely transmit information. Anticipating this motive, the designer can restrict the set of admissible experiments, but cannot prevent the experimenter from garbling any admissible experiment. We model this situation as delegation over experiments. The optimal delegation set can be obtained by comparing maximally informative experiments among those the experimenter has no incentive to garble. When the experimenter's preferences are $S$-shaped, we fully characterize such experiments as double censorship. Relative to the full delegation outcome, upper censorship, double censorship features an intermediate pooling region, inducing a smaller pooling region for the highest states. We show that the designer strictly benefits from imposing a nontrivial delegation set to constrain the experimenter's ability to persuade while retaining valuable information provision.

2026-03-11T15:18:32Z Francesco Bilotta Christoph Carnehl Justus Preusser http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09450v2 2026-03-11T12:16:10Z

This paper proposes a change in perspective on the ``transformation of values'' problem: from ``searching for a single constant solution'' to ``characterizing the allocation space under objective constraints imposed by the physical production network.'' Building an input--output model, we show mathematically that whenever the macroeconomy features a physical surplus, the set of skilled-to-simple labor reduction vectors that can sustain the subsistence floor of the entire labor force forms a bounded value-feasible set . Within this multidimensional region, the classical ``two great macro equalities'' necessarily hold simultaneously for a reasonable range of profit rates. Hence, without violating the physical minimum conditions for reproduction, the law of value and the nominal price system can be made logically consistent.

2026-03-10T10:03:08Z Jiyuan Lyu http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13250v2 2026-03-11T10:54:31Z

The code that was used in Erdil & Ergin (2008, AER) to compute stable improvement cycles sometimes generated unstable matchings. I identify the minor bug in their code that caused this issue, and I present a corrected implementation. While the general insights from the computational experiments obtained by Erdil & Ergin (2008) persist, the true fraction of improving students is slightly smaller than reported, while their average improvement in rank is larger than reported. All theoretical findings in Erdil & Ergin (2008) are unaffected.

2026-02-02T08:57:10Z Comment on DOI:10.1257/aer.98.3.669 Tom Demeulemeester http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19945v5 2026-03-10T22:47:58Z

We study the design of an auction for an income-generating asset such as an intellectual property license. Each bidder has a signal about his future income from acquiring the asset. After the asset is allocated, the winner's income from the asset is realized privately. The principal can audit the winner, at a cost, and then charge a payment contingent on the winner's realized income. We solve for an auction that maximizes the principal's revenue, net of auditing costs. The winning bidder is charged linear royalties up to a cap, beyond which there is no auditing. A higher bidder pays more in cash upfront and faces a lower royalty cap.

2024-03-29T03:00:05Z Ian Ball Teemu Pekkarinen http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09875v3 2026-03-10T22:40:40Z

We consider a sender-receiver game in which the receiver's action is binary and the sender's preferences are state-independent. The state is multidimensional. The receiver can select one dimension of the state to check (i.e., observe) before choosing his action. We identify a class of influential equilibria in which the sender's message reveals which components of the state are highest, and the receiver selects one of these components to check. The sender can benefit from communication if and only if she prefers one of these equilibria to the no-communication outcome. Similar equilibria exist when the receiver can check multiple dimensions.

2025-01-16T23:11:36Z Ian Ball Xin Gao http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21694v2 2026-03-10T19:47:47Z

We introduce an information order on experiments based on weighted garbling, a generalization of the standard notion of garbling. In this order, an experiment is more informative than another if the latter is a weighted garbling of the former. We show that this is equivalent to ordinary garbling conditional on a payoff-irrelevant event. We also characterize the order in terms of induced posterior belief distributions, showing that it depends only on their support. Our main results provide two decision-theoretic characterizations of this order. First, in static decision problems, one experiment dominates another if and only if its value of information is at least a fixed fraction of the other's across all problems. Second, in a class of stopping time problems with a hidden Markov process and repeated experimentation, one experiment dominates another if and only if it yields weakly higher expected payoffs for every problem with a regular prior.

2024-10-29T03:22:54Z Daehyun Kim Ichiro Obara http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07629v3 2026-03-10T16:04:39Z

We study dynamic relationships in which one party extracts current surplus in ways that degrade the future state, while the counterparty cannot exit but adjusts effort in response. Standard stationary Markov equilibria may sustain collapse paths in which short-run extraction dominates strictly positive continuation gains. We introduce the Sustainable Exploitation Equilibrium (SEE), a refinement for dynamic games with irreversible failure modeled as an absorbing boundary that eliminates continuation value. When a survival-preserving action exists and failure destroys future surplus, equilibria assigning positive probability to collapse are sequentially irrational. Equilibrium analysis can therefore be restricted, without loss, to continuation-preserving stationary Markov equilibria. Within this restricted domain, viable renegotiation-proofness becomes structural: because failure truncates future surplus, any jointly improving survival-preserving deviation is credible prior to collapse. SEE selects the viable, renegotiation-stable equilibrium that maximizes the exploiter's value. Existence is established under standard conditions, and the refinement is illustrated in a hegemon-client setting.

2025-12-08T15:18:37Z Nicholas H. Kirk http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09683v1 2026-03-10T13:51:36Z

We provide a unifying way to analyze how risk aversion changes bidding in auctions by asking which bids become more attractive as bidders become more risk averse. In first-price auctions, under two payoff conditions--winning is never worse than the outside option, and winning with a low bid is preferable to winning only with a high bid--greater risk aversion makes high bids more appealing. In second-price auctions with a known outside option, bidding more increases risk exposure conditional on winning, so greater risk aversion favors lower bids. We show these bid-level forces translate into corresponding equilibrium comparative statics.

2026-03-10T13:51:36Z Marilyn Pease Mark Whitmeyer http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09539v1 2026-03-10T11:50:06Z

We introduce the sampling logit equilibrium (SLE), a stationary concept for population games in which agents evaluate actions using a finite sample of opponents' plays and respond according to a logit choice rule. This framework combines informational frictions from finite sampling with stochastic choice. When the sample size is large, SLE is well approximated by a logit equilibrium of a virtual game whose payoffs incorporate explicit distortion terms generated by sampling noise. Examples illustrate how finite sampling can systematically shift equilibrium behavior and generate equilibrium selection effects.

2026-03-10T11:50:06Z Minoru Osawa http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09387v1 2026-03-10T08:58:44Z

We examine how causal beliefs affect an agent's choices and how feedback on those choices leads to updated causal beliefs. Building on the structural-equations framework for modeling causality, we first examine the general problem of updating causal beliefs in the face of novel (and possibly inexplicable) data. We model an agent who is uncertain of the true causal model, and therefore entertains a probabilistic belief over the set of possible models. We then consider how causal beliefs influence choices by building a model of agency and utility on top of the usual structural-equations framework. Using these two components, we propose a notion of steady state, where the feedback received from an agent's optimal action, given her current beliefs about the true causal model, can be rationalized by those beliefs.

2026-03-10T08:58:44Z Joseph Y. Halpern Evan Piermont Marie-Louise Vierø http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09323v1 2026-03-10T07:57:33Z

We develop an analytically tractable model featuring heterogeneous workers and firms, where labor markets clear through a one-to-many sorting mechanism. Firms determine both the number and composition of their employees, shaping (1) the income distribution among workers and (2) the productivity distribution across firms. We study business cycles driven by market efficiency shocks that disproportionately benefit more productive firms. The model's implications are consistent with empirical regularities on the cyclical behavior of wage and productivity distributions.

2026-03-10T07:57:33Z Paweł Gola Haozhou Tang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09280v1 2026-03-10T07:05:39Z

We study intergenerational transfers of income. In our stylized model, each generation in an infinite (but countable) stream is endowed with some income. An allocation rule associates with each infinite stream another stream, thus involving intergenerational transfers of income. We single out a family of geometric rules as a consequence of imposing axioms formalizing the principles of consistency, continuity and independence (as well as the basic requirements of feasibility and scale invariance).

2026-03-10T07:05:39Z Encarnación Algaba Juan D. Moreno-Ternero Eric Rémila Philippe Solal http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08595v4 2026-03-10T04:14:04Z

In the context of voting with ranked ballots, an important class of voting rules is the class of margin-based rules (also called pairwise rules). A voting rule is margin-based if whenever two elections generate the same head-to-head margins of victory or loss between candidates, the voting rule yields the same outcome in both elections. Although this is a mathematically natural invariance property to consider, whether it should be regarded as a normative axiom on voting rules is less clear. In this paper, we address this question for voting rules with any kind of output, whether a set of candidates, a ranking, a probability distribution, etc. We prove that a voting rule is margin-based if and only if it satisfies some axioms with clearer normative content. A key axiom is what we call Preferential Equality, stating that if two voters both rank a candidate $x$ immediately above a candidate $y$, then either voter switching to rank $y$ immediately above $x$ will have the same effect on the election outcome as if the other voter made the switch, so each voter's preference for $y$ over $x$ is treated equally.

2025-01-15T05:42:36Z Updated Fact 3.10 Yifeng Ding Wesley H. Holliday Eric Pacuit http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20281v2 2026-03-09T20:30:20Z

We study incentive design when multiple principals simultaneously design mechanisms for their respective teams in environments with strategic spillovers. In this environment, each principal's set of incentive-compatible mechanisms--those that satisfy their own agents' incentive compatibility constraints--depends on the mechanisms offered by the other teams. Following a classic example by Myerson (1982), such games may lack equilibrium due to discontinuities in the correspondence of incentive-compatible mechanisms. We establish general conditions for equilibrium existence by introducing a novel approach that involves tracking both the outcome distributions along the truthful-obedient path and the sets of outcome distributions achievable through unilateral deviations, thereby providing a foundation for analyzing a wide range of multi-principal mechanism design with team production and agency problems.

2026-02-23T19:09:05Z Brian Roberson http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14282v4 2026-03-09T19:13:17Z

A growing number of authorities use mechanisms to allocate students to schools in a way that reflects student preferences and school priorities. However, most real-world mechanisms incentivize students to strategically misreport their preferences. Misreporting complicates the identification of causal parameters that depend on true preferences, which are necessary inputs for a broad class of counterfactual analyses. We provide an identification approach robust to misreporting and derive sharp bounds on causal effects of school assignment. Our approach applies to allocation rules characterized by placement scores and cutoffs. We use data from a deferred acceptance mechanism that assigns students to university programs in Chile. Matching theory predicts and empirical evidence shows that students behave strategically in Chile because they face constraints on preference submission and have good prior information about school accessibility. Our bounds are informative enough to reveal significant heterogeneity in graduation success with respect to preferences and school assignment.

2023-07-26T16:35:42Z Marinho Bertanha Margaux Luflade Ismael Mourifié