https://arxiv.org/api/eTSBEBa3D+vTxFA9uBmmOyD+HRg 2026-06-13T13:38:38Z 4046 45 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12328v3 2026-06-06T22:20:59Z

If a sender in a persuasion game can use a sequence of experiments rather than a single experiment, does this change the sender's value? We show, within a large class of non-Bayesian updating rules, divisibility, introduced in Cripps (2018), exactly characterizes the receiver's updating rules under which the sender is indifferent between static and dynamic persuasion in any environment. Consequently, restricting attention to static persuasion is without loss precisely under divisible updating rules.

2025-08-17T10:56:18Z Masanori Kobayashi http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04142v2 2026-06-06T21:58:10Z

In heterogeneous OLG economies, age alone does not tell us who counts as young or old in a local welfare comparison. For such a comparison to have normative content, it must specify the represented margin, the private unit of account, the current information that identifies the relevant cell, and the common support over which claims are made. This paper develops such a discipline, separating raw resource weights from residual weights expressed in private value units and showing that imposed local discount labels are valid precisely when they are induced by a potential on the supported comparison graph, whose vertices are current cells and whose edges are admissible age comparisons. A calibrated audit of an OLG model then maps the frontier of certified claims, with support, units, wedges, and anchors determining which welfare signs are justified.

2026-06-02T18:56:54Z Revised version clarifies a few theorem and lemma statements & streamlines the exposition of the comparison graph and bridge I. Sebastian Buhai http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03026v3 2026-06-06T21:54:21Z

When can interventions in markets be designed to increase surplus robustly -- i.e., with high probability -- accounting for uncertainty due to imprecise information about economic primitives? In a setting with many strategic firms, each possessing some market power, we present conditions for such interventions to exist. The key condition, recoverable structure, requires large-scale complementarities among families of products. The analysis works by decomposing the incidence of interventions in terms of principal components of a Slutsky matrix. Under recoverable structure, a noisy signal of this matrix reveals enough about these principal components to design robust interventions. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of spectral methods for analyzing imperfectly observed strategic interactions with many agents.

2024-11-05T11:49:11Z Andrea Galeotti Benjamin Golub Sanjeev Goyal Eduard Talamàs Omer Tamuz http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06251v2 2026-06-06T20:51:48Z

This paper studies interdependent durations as equilibrium outcomes of a synchronization game, a continuous-time stopping game in which the incentive to stop increases when other players stop. We allow the payoffs to vary with both common shocks and observed and unobserved agent characteristics. The common shocks follow a spectrally negative Lévy process, a semiparametric process that includes Brownian motion as a special case but may also have jumps. We show that equilibrium outcomes can be represented as interdependent hitting times and use this to establish the game's nonparametric identification from data on stopping times and covariates. We develop maximum simulated likelihood and method of simulated moments estimators and evaluate their finite-sample and computational performance in Monte Carlo experiments. The results provide a tractable framework for identifying and estimating synchronization games from interdependent duration data.

2026-06-04T14:53:50Z 45 pages (including title page). The ancillary files include the online supplement (17 pages) to this paper Jaap H. Abbring Yifan Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08297v1 2026-06-06T18:45:08Z

We provide a strategic foundation for information: in any given game with incomplete information we define strategic quotients as information representations that are sufficient for players to compute best-responses to other players. We prove 1/ existence and essential uniqueness of a minimal strategic quotient called the Strategic Type Space (STS) in which a type is given by an interim correlated rationalizability hierarchy and represents a set of beliefs over other players' types and nature that rationalize this hierarchy and 2/ that the minimal STS has a recursive structure that is captured by a finite automaton.

2026-06-06T18:45:08Z Olivier Gossner Rafael Veiel http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08294v1 2026-06-06T18:30:28Z

Online hate speech is a global challenge amplified by engagement8-driven social media algorithms. This paper develops an epidemiological model of hate speech propagation capturing the strategic interaction between a profit-maximizing platform and a welfare-maximizing government. The platform's profit depends on the prevalence of hate speech and on its own algorithmic reactivity, creating a feedback loop between the epidemic and economic incentives. The government sets an optimal tax on amplification to internalize the social costs, balancing the benefit of tax revenue against the deadweight loss of taxation. The Stackelberg equilibrium is characterised analytically and solved numerically. The optimal tax reduces hate speech prevalence, eliminates bistability and lowers victim harm.

2026-06-06T18:30:28Z Nazaria Solferino http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12571v2 2026-06-06T17:03:57Z

We study agents playing a pure coordination game on a large social network. Agents are restricted to coordinate locally, without access to a global communication device, and so different regions of the network will converge to different actions, precluding perfect coordination. We show that the extent of this inefficiency depends on the network geometry: on some networks, near-perfect efficiency is achievable, while on others welfare is strictly bounded away from the optimum. We provide a geometric condition on the network structure that characterizes when near-efficiency is attainable. On networks in which it is unattainable, our results more generally preclude high correlations between outcomes in a large spectrum of dynamic games.

2026-02-13T03:28:42Z 38 pages Tom Hutchcroft Olga Rospuskova Omer Tamuz http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08227v1 2026-06-06T15:31:16Z

A well-known model in game theory, the Volunteer's Dilemma describes a group of $n$ players who decide whether to volunteer for a collective benefit at a personal cost, or to abstain and risk forfeiting the benefit altogether. A quantum version of this dilemma, developed within the Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein framework, allows each player to manipulate one qubit of a shared entangled state, leading to symmetric Nash equilibria with higher expected payoffs than in the classical game. Existing analyses, however, assume maximal entanglement. Within the same framework, we introduce a generalized Quantum Volunteer's Dilemma with a tunable entanglement parameter $γ$ and study the extent to which equilibrium behavior depends on the level of entanglement. We derive explicit conditions relating $γ$, the number of players, and the players' strategies under which symmetric Nash equilibria exist, focusing on two canonical strategy profiles: one for $2\leq n\leq 9$, and one for even $n$. We find that maximal entanglement is not required to sustain symmetric equilibria. Instead, equilibrium behavior persists above a threshold value, which we compute analytically in both cases. We also demonstrate that the threshold value directly depends on system size. This characterization is directly relevant for implementations on resource-constrained quantum devices, where entanglement is inherently limited.

2026-06-06T15:31:16Z 19 pages, 2 figures Noah Dane Hebdon Dax Enshan Koh http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01279v3 2026-06-06T05:43:36Z

When competing sellers delegate pricing to a shared AI model, such as a large language model, correlated recommendations combined with performance-driven updates aggregating seller feedback raise a key question: can standard AI deployment practices inadvertently produce supracompetitive pricing? We develop a stylized duopoly model in which two sellers receive pricing recommendations from a shared AI characterized by two parameters: a propensity parameter capturing the model's tendency to set high prices and an output-fidelity parameter measuring alignment between this tendency and actual outputs, with propensity updated via periodic retraining on observed outcomes. We find that configuring AI models for robustness and reproducibility can lead to supracompetitive pricing via a phase transition. Below a critical output-fidelity threshold, competitive pricing is the unique stable outcome. Above it, the model exhibits bistability: both competitive and supracompetitive pricing are locally stable, with the realized outcome determined by the model's initial propensity. Supracompetitive pricing raises average prices, but occasional low-price recommendations complicate detection. With perfect output fidelity, full price coordination emerges from any interior initial propensity. For finite training batches of size $b$, when the initial propensity lies in the supracompetitive basin, the probability of supracompetitive pricing approaches 1 as $b$ increases, with the region of indeterminate outcomes shrinking at rate $O(1/\sqrt{b})$. Any factor reducing alignment between the model's propensity and sellers' actual pricing, whether through diversifying AI providers, introducing recommendation noise, or reducing seller adherence, pushes the market toward competitive outcomes.

2026-01-03T20:38:21Z 46 pages Shengyu Cao Ming Hu http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26065v2 2026-06-05T22:48:53Z

We study a classical Bewley-Huggett-Aiyagari model in continuous time in which ex-post heterogeneity arises due to idiosyncratic, uninsurable income shocks. Our framework is rooted in the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level (FTPL), and we investigate the existence and multiplicity of stationary equilibria in models with and without capital. We establish the existence of an arbitrary even number of equilibria in which the government runs small constant deficits, which in turn implies the multiplicity of price levels.

2025-10-30T01:38:08Z Felix Höfer http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26703v2 2026-06-05T22:02:25Z

The classic concept of "calibrated forecasts" and its more recent refinement, "calibeating," are defined with respect to the standard quadratic scoring rule. We extend these notions to the class of $\textit{proper}$ scoring rules (for which the best forecast is the true distribution) and define $\textit{proper-calibration}$ and $\textit{proper-calibeating}$ by requiring the errors to converge to zero uniformly over all bounded proper scoring rules. We first establish that calibration always implies proper-calibration, whereas calibeating need not imply proper-calibeating. Second, we show how to guarantee proper-calibeating and proper-multicalibeating. Finally, we demonstrate the equivalence between proper-calibration and universal no regret when best replying to forecasts in decision-making under uncertainty.

2026-05-26T08:44:45Z v2: Updated section 6 "Decision Making Under Uncertainty" Dean P. Foster Sergiu Hart http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09083v2 2026-06-05T18:10:21Z

Many economic interventions are designed as marginal changes in incentives. Yet in environments shaped by coordination, institutional persistence, and path dependence, such reforms often leave behavior largely unchanged. This paper studies interventions in games when equilibrium selection displays status-quo inertia: if the pre-intervention equilibrium remains a Nash equilibrium after policy, it continues to be selected. In that environment, price-based interventions and simple option expansion may fail even when they improve welfare in a partial-equilibrium sense. By contrast, interventions that modify the feasible action space, especially deletion and replacement interventions, can be substantially more effective because they remove the strategic basis for persistence. We develop a simple framework, derive general results, provide complete proofs, and illustrate the economics with examples from climate transition, platform regulation, financial reform, and industrial modernization. The analysis highlights a basic policy lesson: when inefficient equilibria are institutionally entrenched, the central problem is often not how to price the existing game more finely, but how to change the game itself.

2026-05-09T17:47:54Z Madjid Eshaghi Gordji Esmaiel Abounoori Mohamadali Berahman http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07469v1 2026-06-05T17:22:44Z

This paper sets out the most general computational and econometric implications of the rigorous stochastic equilibrium theory from SELCKE (Staines (2024a)) arXiv:2312.16214. The analytical backbone is the discovery that the system converges geometrically to long-run equilibrium, at a rate given by the greater of the eigenvalue or inverse eigenvalue (from outside) closest to the unit circle and the maximum shock persistence. High-order shocks converge faster. I develop a simulation procedure to test, with asymptotic power, whether stochastic equilibrium exists for a particular model. The fundamental approximation result asserts that, whatever the order of expansion or loss function, the stochastic steady state delivers the most accurate perturbation solution. I also show that super-consistent parameter estimators $O(1/T)$ arise whenever second-order terms vanish. Besides Calvo, I study stochastic equilibrium in two alternative pricing models. Dynamics simplify considerably. I bound the time the impulse response peaks, by the maximum lag in the errors. This lends empirical support to Taylor contracts, although there are issues surrounding unit roots and the strong cost-channel. For menu costs, I demonstrate that the initial price distribution decays away super-exponentially, producing a system equivalent to Calvo with an endogenous reset probability. The impact of idiosyncratic disturbances appears as an additional wedge between actual and efficient output. Blow-up of the objective function at the boundary is proven, with the help of new distributional arguments, so the model meets existing eigenvalue existence conditions for the recursive equilibrium. Along the way, new light is shone on existing theoretical models and statistical procedures.

2026-06-05T17:22:44Z 91 Pages: 63 Main Text, 28 Suppelementary Materials David Staines http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03124v6 2026-06-05T17:11:44Z

Individuals often act without knowing the full structure of the social network in which they are or will be embedded. We study how an individual's beliefs about their networks shapes their behavior when actions are peer interactive. Agents use what they know about the network to forecast their peers' actions. Those peers' actions depend on their beliefs, which then generate an iterative expression what we call "Iterative Belief Centrality." Agents' beliefs formed based on what they each see of the network are heterogeneous, depend on their network position, and can be correlated across connected agents. The resulting equilibrium behavior nests both complete-information and degree-based models as special cases, but more generally can differ systematically. If people's beliefs about the network satisfy a natural monotonicity condition in how connected they are, then belief iteration (fully rationally) amplifies behavioral differences across the network, increasing actions of more-connected and decreasing actions of less-connected agents relative to situations with homogeneous beliefs. We also show how positive correlation in people's positions in the network even further amplifies the variance of behavior. The framework provides a unified and tractable theory of network-based behavior with implications for many applications.

2023-05-04T19:50:43Z Promit K. Chaudhuri Matthew O. Jackson Sudipta Sarangi Hector Tzavellas http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21275v3 2026-06-05T16:50:07Z

We propose a solution and a mechanism for two-agent social choice problems with large (infinite) policy spaces. Our solution is an efficient compromise rule between the two agents, built on a common cardinalization of their preferences. Our mechanism, the *multimatum* has the two players alternate in proposing sets of alternatives from which the other must choose. Our main result shows that the multimatum fully implements our compromise solution in subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. We demonstrate the power and versatility of this approach through applications to political economy, other-regarding preferences, and facility location.

2026-01-29T05:11:17Z Federico Echenique Matías Núñez