https://arxiv.org/api/TENuyRHS1CG0Ysfe9N2dwTl1wAo 2026-03-28T12:28:01Z 3829 300 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04456v3 2026-01-28T17:00:03Z

A welfare-maximizing designer allocates two kinds of goods using two wasteful screening instruments: ordeals, which enter agents' utilities additively, and damages, which harm agents in proportion to their values for the goods. If agents have common valuations for one of the goods, damages always lead to Pareto-dominated mechanisms: any allocation using damages can be implemented with ordeals alone, while leaving higher rents to inframarginal types. However, damages can be optimal when agents' valuations for both goods are heterogeneous: with multidimensional types, the two devices differ in how they sort agents into the available options, and optimal sorting can sometimes require damages. I nevertheless identify distributional conditions under which damages are not optimal. In those cases, the optimal mechanism produces an efficient allocation by posting ``market-clearing'' ordeals for each good.

2025-08-06T13:56:03Z Filip Tokarski http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12457v3 2026-01-28T05:01:22Z

This paper studies optimal mechanisms for collecting and trading data. Consumers benefit from revealing information about their tastes to a service provider because this improves the service. However, the information is also valuable to a third party as it may extract more revenue from the consumer in another market called the product market. The paper characterizes the constrained optimal mechanism for the service provider subject to incentive feasibility. It is shown that although the service provider sometimes sells no information or only partial information in order to preserve profits in the service market, selling full information is optimal when the data-sourcing market is highly differentiated. Moreover, a ban on data trade may reduce social welfare because it makes it harder to price discriminate in the product market. Instead, reducing the intermediary's bargaining power can protect privacy without hurting social welfare, which suggests that the regulation of market power is more efficient than the regulation of data sharing.

2024-06-18T10:00:44Z Jiadong Gu http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12477v3 2026-01-28T00:21:30Z

Tirole (1985) studied an overlapping generations model with capital accumulation and showed that the emergence of asset bubbles solves the capital over-accumulation problem. His Proposition 1(c) claims that if the dividend growth rate is above the bubbleless interest rate (the steady-state interest rate in the economy without the asset) but below the population growth rate, then bubbles are necessary in the sense that there exists no bubbleless equilibrium but there exists a unique bubbly equilibrium. We show that this result (as stated) is incorrect by presenting an example economy that satisfies all assumptions of Proposition 1(c) but its unique equilibrium is bubbleless. We also restore Proposition 1(c) under the additional assumptions that initial capital is sufficiently large and dividends are sufficiently small. We show through examples that these conditions are essential.

2025-07-07T20:20:51Z Comment on Tirole (1985) "Asset Bubbles and Overlapping Generations", DOI: 10.2307/1913232 Ngoc-Sang Pham Alexis Akira Toda http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03607v2 2026-01-27T22:38:30Z

A long-lived Bayesian agent observes costly signals of a time-varying state. He chooses the signals' precisions sequentially, balancing their costs and marginal informativeness. I compare the optimal myopic and forward-looking precisions when the state follows a Brownian motion. I also compare the myopic precisions induced by other Gaussian processes.

2024-01-07T23:35:13Z 23 pages; 2 figures. V2 fixes typos/grammar, adds some references, and removes some footnotes Benjamin Davies http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16560v2 2026-01-27T22:24:59Z

We revisit the classic paper of Tirole "Asset Bubbles and Overlapping Generations" (1985, Econometrica), which shows that the emergence of asset bubbles solves the capital over-accumulation problem. While Tirole's main insight holds with pure bubbles (assets without dividends), we argue that his original analysis with a dividend-paying asset contains some issues. We provide a fairly complete analysis of Tirole's model with general dividends such as equilibrium existence, uniqueness, and long-run behavior under weaker but explicit assumptions and complement with examples based on closed-form solutions. Some of the claims in Tirole (1985) require qualifications including (i) after the introduction of an asset with negligible dividends, the economy may collapse towards zero capital stock ("resource curse") and (ii) the necessity of bubbles is less clear-cut.

2025-01-27T23:03:44Z Ngoc-Sang Pham Alexis Akira Toda http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20035v1 2026-01-27T20:17:53Z

A principal must allocate a set of heterogeneous tasks (or objects) among multiple agents. The principal has preferences over the allocation. Each agent has preferences over which tasks they are assigned, which are their private information. The principal is constrained by the fact that each agent has the right to demand some status-quo task assignment. I characterize the conditions under which the principal can gain by delegating some control over the assignment to the agents. Within a large class of delegation mechanisms, I then characterize those that are obviously strategy-proof (OSP), and provide guidance for choosing among OSP mechanisms.

2026-01-27T20:17:53Z Quitzé Valenzuela-Stookey http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16878v7 2026-01-27T11:55:08Z

The Council of the European Union (EU) is one of the main decision-making bodies of the EU. A number of decisions require a qualified majority, the support of 55% of the member states (currently 15) that represent at least 65% of the total population. We investigate how the power distribution based on the Shapley--Shubik index and the proportion of winning coalitions change if these criteria are modified within reasonable bounds. The power of the two countries, with approximately 4% of the total population each, is found to be almost flat. The decisiveness index decreases if the population criterion is above 68\% or the states criterion is at least 17. Some quota combinations contradict the principles of double majority. The proportion of winning coalitions can be increased from 13.2% to 20.8% (30.1%) such that the maximal relative change in the Shapley--Shubik indices remains below 3.5% (5.5%). Our results are indispensable for evaluating any proposal to reform the qualified majority voting system.

2023-12-28T08:07:33Z 24 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables Group Decision and Negotiation, 2026, forthcoming Dóra Gréta Petróczy László Csató 10.1007/s10726-026-09964-1 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19329v1 2026-01-27T08:14:18Z

This paper characterizes DSGE models as fixed-point selection devices for self-referential economic specifications. We formalize this structure as $(S, T, Π)$: specification, self-referential operator, and equilibrium selector. The framework applies to any DSGE model through compositional pipelines where specifications are transformed, fixed points computed, and equilibria selected. We provide formal results and computational implementation for linear rational-expectations systems, reinterpreting Blanchard-Kahn conditions as a specific selection operator and verifying that standard solution methods (such as QZ decomposition and OccBin) realize this operation. We show that alternative selectors (minimal-variance, fiscal anchoring) become available under indeterminacy, revealing selection as a policy choice rather than a mathematical necessity. Our framework reveals the formal structure underlying DSGE solution methods, enabling programmatic verification and systematic comparison of selection rules.

2026-01-27T08:14:18Z 34 pages, 1 figure, 3 tables. Code and data: A Julia implementation of the $(S,T,Π)$ framework is publicly available at https://github.com/mitsuhir0/DsgeSelectionFramework.jl with permanent archival at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18344418 Mitsuhiro Okano http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18544v2 2026-01-27T04:28:07Z

Empirical evidence suggests that there is little to no correlation between the rate of inflation and the size of price change. Economists have hitherto taken this to mean that monetary shocks do not generate much deviation in relative prices and therefore inflation does not hurt the economy by impeding the workings of the price system. This paper presents a production network model of inflationary dynamics in which it is well possible for inflation to have near-zero correlation with the size of price change yet cause significant distortion of relative prices. The relative price distortion caused by inflation critically depends on the spectral gap, degree distribution, and assortativity of the production network.

2026-01-26T14:49:11Z Vipin P Veetil http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05939v2 2026-01-26T18:22:37Z

We introduce a rational inattention model which produces a unique, interior, weighted multinomial logit conditional choice probability for an agent who acquires costly information about the hedonic characteristics (e.g. whether an insurance contract has high coverage) of their choices and about their payoff-relevant states (e.g. their risk of incurring a loss). As usual, the objective is to choose a joint distribution subject to one marginal constraint (``Bayes plausibility''). We approach the problem by re-writing it in terms of an inner problem of maximizing over \textit{two} constraints and an outer problem of choosing the ``optimal constraint.'' The inner problem is a Schrödinger bridge problem. The outer problem is strictly concave.

2025-08-08T02:05:19Z Chris Engh http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18732v1 2026-01-26T17:55:56Z

Machine learning systems embed preferences either in training losses or through post-processing of calibrated predictions. Applying information design methods from Strack and Yang (2024), this paper provides decision problem agnostic conditions under which separation training preference free and applying preferences ex post is optimal. Unlike prior work that requires specifying downstream objectives, the welfare results here apply uniformly across decision problems. The key primitive is a diminishing-value-of-information condition: relative to a fixed (normalised) preference-free loss, preference embedding makes informativeness less valuable at the margin, inducing a mean-preserving contraction of learned posteriors. Because the value of information is convex in beliefs, preference-free training weakly dominates for any expected utility decision problem. This provides theoretical foundations for modular AI pipelines that learn calibrated probabilities and implement asymmetric costs through downstream decision rules. However, separation requires users to implement optimal decision rules. When cognitive constraints bind, as documented in human AI decision-making, preference embedding can dominate by automating threshold computation. These results provide design guidance: preserve optionality through post-processing when objectives may shift; embed preferences when decision-stage frictions dominate.

2026-01-26T17:55:56Z 54 pages, 2 figures Joshua S. Gans http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07293v2 2026-01-26T17:08:31Z

A group of privately informed agents chooses between two alternatives. How should the decision rule be designed if agents are known to be biased in favor of one of the options? We address this question by considering the Condorcet Jury Setting as a mechanism design problem. Applications include the optimal decision mechanisms for boards of directors, political committees, and trial juries. While we allow for any kind of mechanism, the optimal mechanism is a voting mechanism. In the terminology of the trial jury example: When jurors (agents) are more eager to convict than the lawmaker (principal), then the defendant should be convicted if and only if neither too many nor too few jurors vote to convict. This kind of mechanism accords with a judicial procedure from ancient Jewish law.

2024-07-10T01:01:50Z Deniz Kattwinkel Alexander Winter http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18654v1 2026-01-26T16:31:04Z

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) is reshaping content creation on digital platforms by reducing production costs and enabling scalable output of varying quality. In response, platforms have begun adopting disclosure policies that require creators to label AI-generated content, often supported by imperfect detection and penalties for non-compliance. This paper develops a formal model to study the economic implications of such disclosure regimes. We compare a non-disclosure benchmark, in which the platform alone detects AI usage, with a mandatory self-disclosure regime in which creators strategically choose whether to disclose or conceal AI use under imperfect enforcement. The model incorporates heterogeneous creators, viewer discounting of AI-labeled content, trust penalties following detected non-disclosure, and endogenous enforcement. The analysis shows that disclosure is optimal only when both the value of AI-generated content and its cost-saving advantage are intermediate. As AI capability improves, the platform's optimal enforcement strategy evolves from strict deterrence to partial screening and eventual deregulation. While disclosure reliably increases transparency, it reduces aggregate creator surplus and can suppress high-quality AI content when AI is technologically advanced. Overall, the results characterize disclosure as a strategic governance instrument whose effectiveness depends on technological maturity and trust frictions.

2026-01-26T16:31:04Z Juan Wu James Zhe James Zhang Amit Mehra http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21158v3 2026-01-26T09:42:13Z

We examine core concepts in the classical model of Shapley and Scarf (1974) under full preferences. Among the standard concepts, the strong core may be empty, whereas the nonempty weak core may be overly large and contain inefficient elements. Our main findings are: (1) The exclusion core of Balbuzanov and Kotowski (2019) -- a recent concept outperforming standard concepts in complex environments under strict preferences -- can also be empty, yet it is more often nonempty than the strong core. (2) We introduce two new core concepts, respectively built on the exclusion core and the strong core. Both are nonempty and Pareto efficient, and coincide with the strong core whenever it is nonempty. (3) These core concepts are ordered by set inclusion, with the strong core as the smallest and the weak core as the largest.

2025-11-26T08:18:07Z Correct a mistake in the previous Proposition 1. Renumber lemmas and propositions. Move Section 6 to Section 3.1 Jun Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17964v1 2026-01-25T19:44:17Z

How do cost shocks pass through to prices in markets with price dispersion? Pass-through analysis typically assumes a single equilibrium price, but empirical studies consistently document substantial price variation, even for homogeneous products. This paper develops a tractable framework that decomposes the pass-through problem into two distinct tiers. The first is a competition layer where consumers' \textit{consideration sets} determine equilibrium distributions of normalized margins. The second is a curvature layer where demand elasticity determines how these margins translate into prices and pass-through rates. The key theoretical innovation is showing that the strategic pricing game with arbitrary downward-sloping demand is order-isomorphic to a baseline unit-demand game once reformulated in terms of normalized effective margins. This decomposition yields closed-form pass-through formulas, robust bounds across demand specifications, and clear comparative statics linking market structure to incidence.

2026-01-25T19:44:17Z Brian C. Albrecht Mark Whitmeyer