https://arxiv.org/api/rOj5ErM1rI853DaRKb6EF22/DAY2026-09-11T19:59:14Z43543015http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24233v3Bayesian Rational Search Engine User2026-09-07T16:41:49ZA user faces a list returned by a search system, ordered by a noisy proxy for relevance, and decides whether to pay a fixed cost to inspect another item or stop with the best she has uncovered. She does not enter the page knowing how good its items are, so each inspection both produces a candidate item and refines her belief about the page's underlying quality. We show that the optimal policy is a standout rule: the user stops once her best find is sufficiently good relative to what she expects from the page, with the required margin changing with depth. The resulting dynamics collapse to a one-dimensional Markov chain, which yields the full distribution of inspection depth through a closed-form recursion. The model uncovers three hidden mechanisms that explain why users stop: trust, commit, and cut-losses. It also yields a rich set of testable implications. The same Bayesian-rational view turns inspection depth into a learning-to-rank likelihood: an observed depth restricts the latent relevance path to a polyhedron of survival inequalities, while a conversion further identifies the terminal winner. Simulations show that the resulting estimator recovers relevance under correct specification and improves ranking when restricted to the features available to the incumbent ranker. Applied to public Baidu search logs, the inspection depth likelihood produces rankings that align more closely with expert relevance judgments than click-trained alternatives.2026-05-22T21:22:08ZShichao Mahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07682v1Very Justified Envy2026-09-07T16:05:41ZThis paper studies the intensity of priority violations in matching markets. An agent is said to have very justified envy if she prefers another agent's match to her own and her priority advantage for the object exceeds $k$ ranks. I show that unless $k$ is prohibitively large, Pareto efficiency is incompatible with the elimination of very justified envy. A simple generalization of Deferred Acceptance and Immediate Acceptance is proposed and shown to eliminate very justified envy for any $k$. In simulations of random matching markets, I find that modest relaxations to justified envy can yield significant improvements in assignment ranks.2026-09-07T16:05:41ZAdam Hamdanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07358v1Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment2026-09-07T11:25:03ZGenerative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.2026-09-07T11:25:03ZPaul AlthausLeon HoufChristiane Schwierenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10638v4Timing, Entry, and Revenue in Clock-Based Platform Markets2026-09-07T07:36:50ZOn platforms where time-to-contract is itself payoff-relevant--Aalsmeer's flower auctions, ride-hailing dispatch, on-demand-labor matching--the textbook revenue equivalence between Dutch and first-price formats holds the trading outcome fixed. Once participation is endogenous and both sides bear waiting costs, the trading format directly shapes who enters, market thickness, volume, and platform revenue. The platform's ranking of the descending clock against immediate and batched posted-price benchmarks is decided by two estimable primitives on each side of the market: an earnings gap and a timing gap. A bidirectional four-case classification identifies when the descending clock dominates at every level of waiting costs, only above a floor, only below a ceiling, or not at all; the last case is unconditional -- when the descending clock charges no more per trade and contracts no faster than the posted-price benchmark, it cannot win. No format admits a universal ranking. The local verdict propagates through endogenous entry, and cross-side complementarity amplifies shared local advantages into joint dominance. A conditional revenue theorem converts entry and volume gains into a platform-revenue ranking. In calibrated parameterizations the revenue-ranking switching boundary lies near $p_0/\bar v\approx 1$, inside the empirical range for ride-hailing platforms. A measurement protocol provides explicit nonparametric estimators for the six reduced-form objects and a test statistic for the dominance condition, and a Lean~4 formalization audits the algebraic and order-theoretic content. In markets where goods or services cannot wait, the speed of the trading mechanism is a primitive of market design.2026-04-12T13:30:55Zstructural re-work must take place upon journal reviewsThomas PitzVinicius Ferrazhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02243v3Optimal Scheduling of Electricity and Water in Renewable-Colocated Desalination Plants2026-09-06T23:40:21ZWe develop a mathematical framework for the optimal scheduling of flexible water desalination plants (WDPs) as hybrid generator-load resources. WDPs integrate thermal generation, membrane-based controllable loads, and renewable energy sources, offering unique operational flexibility for power system operations. They can simultaneously participate in two markets: selling desalinated water to a water utility, and bidirectionally transacting electricity with the grid based on their net electricity demand. We formulate the scheduling decision problem of a profit-maximizing WDP, capturing operational, technological, and market-based coupling between water and electricity flows. The threshold-based structure we derive provides computationally tractable coordination suitable for large-scale deployment, offering operational and economical insights into how thermal and membrane-based desalination colocated with renewables complementarily provide continuous bidirectional flexibility. The thresholds are analytically characterized in near closed form as explicit functions of technology and tariff parameters. We examine how small changes in the exogenous tariff and technology parameters affect the WDP's profit. Extensive simulations illustrate the optimal WDP's operation, profit, and water-electricity exchange, demonstrating significant improvements relative to benchmark algorithms.2026-01-05T16:19:30Z16 pages, 11 figures, 5 tablesAhmed S. AlahmedAudun BotterudSaurabh Aminhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06865v1School Choice with Appeals2026-09-06T22:48:00ZRoughly fifty thousand families in England appeal their school assignments each year through a centralized and understudied procedure that improves the placement of about one in five claimants. This paper shows that appeals are not an institutional afterthought: they change how parents report preferences to the education authority and the quality of placements it generates. Once the appeal stage is incorporated, Immediate Acceptance (IA) becomes less manipulable and can support equilibrium outcomes that Pareto dominate those of Deferred Acceptance (DA) under truth-telling, reversing the DA-IA welfare comparison. In a preregistered experiment, we find results consistent with the theoretical predictions: appeals increase truth-telling in IA, leaving DA essentially unchanged, and widen the IA-DA efficiency gap. Around 60% of the IA efficiency gain appears before any appeal is upheld, because subjects anticipating the possibility of a potential appeal rank schools differently.2026-09-06T22:48:00ZClaudia CerroneYoan HermstrüwerJosué Ortegahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06841v1Mobile but Miserable: Social comparison networks and social mobility2026-09-06T21:29:48ZAlthough social mobility is widely viewed as desirable, we document an 'inverse-U' shaped relationship with well-being: mobility is positively associated with well-being when low, but the association diminishes as mobility increases and eventually becomes negative. To explain this, we build a model in which agents are embedded in a social comparison network and suffer from falling behind their peers. The model highlights two channels that can cause welfare to be decreasing in mobility at high levels. First, when mobility is high, further increases widen already significant gaps between agents from similar parental backgrounds but of different abilities. Second, when mobility is high, high-ability agents are already relatively well off. So further increases in social mobility increase inequality. We find evidence supportive of both channels in US data. The model also predicts, and data supports, that social integration -- where relationships form more along ability than background lines -- allows societies to benefit from mobility for longer. We interpret this as social mobility being multidimensional with both economic and social dimensions that are complementary.2026-09-06T21:29:48ZPatrick AllmisMatthew ElliottChristian GhiglinoAlastair Langtryhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11471v3Marx's two aggregate invariants and the solution of the transformation problem in a Morishima-type formalism2026-09-06T12:44:29ZThe unit value of a commodity, as correctly determined by Michio Morishima's method and its variations, is the sum of the labour-values of its inputs and the direct labour required for its production. However, commodities are sold at their prices of production only when they meet effective social demand and are thereby validated as realised social value. Price determination involves the entire economy and the interconnections among its different branches. This condition gives full meaning to Marx's fundamental equalities, which derive from the law of value and function as invariants governing the economy as a whole. These equalities are necessary, and, once combined with the relevant reproduction constraints and a specified wage basket, sufficient to determine the admissible transformation in the simple reproduction cases examined here. We demonstrate this by starting from Morishima's formalism and returning to a formalism closer to that used by Marx.2023-03-20T21:55:29Z38 pagesNorbert AnkriPaïkan Marcaggihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23038v9Stable Matching with Choice Correspondences: Beyond Path Independence2026-09-06T10:09:13ZWe study stable matching with agents' choice correspondences as primitives. For many-to-many markets we introduce Individually Rational Persistence (IRP), which admits status-quo persistence, and show that substitutability (SUB) and IRP guarantee a stable matching; the constructive proof yields a symmetric matching algorithm with no proposing side and long-term contracts. For one-to-one markets we introduce replacement-based stability and show that SUB together with binary acyclicity (BA) guarantees existence. Combining the two, in the many-to-one setting, where SUB and irrelevance of rejected contracts (IRC) guarantee stability, we show that SUB with IRP on firms and BA on workers guarantees existence. We show that, in the presence of SUB, IRC is not necessary for existence in any of the three models, so stable matchings exist outside the domain of path independence.2026-03-24T10:18:07ZVarun BansalMihir BhattacharyaOjasvi Kharehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14464v3A distance-based theory of lottery complexity2026-09-05T21:34:26ZWe propose a measure of lottery complexity that combines probabilistic dispersion with dissimilarity between outcomes. Taking degenerate lotteries, which yield a single outcome with certainty, as the simplest alternatives, we measure complexity by proximity to this class. Specifically, for each degenerate lottery, we compute the expected distance between its certain outcome and the lottery's outcomes, and take the minimum across all degenerate lotteries. We provide an axiomatic characterization establishing uniqueness up to positive rescaling, study how complexity changes under outcome compression, and characterize maximally complex lotteries. Finally, we introduce Complexity-Adjusted Expected Utility preferences and characterize adherence to stochastic dominance and strong risk aversion.2026-08-14T16:44:16ZGiulio Principihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06151v1Ripple Effects: Robust Norms without Punishment2026-09-05T15:52:54ZI propose a novel, tractable model of pro-social norms in large communities with slightly altruistic agents. Agents participate in the norm to influence others to participate in the norm, influencing further agents. A continuum of equilibria sustain the pro-social norm, varying in the distribution of how much agents are influenced by their observations. If agents' effective altruism $α$ is larger than their impatience $1-δ$, equilibria exist that are robust to a population of bad actors. Greater strategic homogeneity increases the robustness of the norm. Robustness is not improved by increasing the number of observers of each action beyond 1.2026-09-05T15:52:54ZAlistair Bartonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25677v2Open-ended innovation arm-race in zero-sum games2026-09-05T15:00:05ZThis note discusses zero-sum games with open-ended innovation, whereby each player may introduce new strategies. The innovation process is modelled as a draw of new strategies form a distribution. It is argued that, when the cost of innovation is vanishingly small, this setting can lead to an everlasting innovation arm-race. In particular, the introduction of new technologies of the advanced player increases the marginal utility for technological innovation of the backward one, whereas innovation of the backward player disincentivizes the more advanced one to innovate.2026-07-28T12:54:39Z5 pages, 1 figuresMatteo Marsilihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12897v2Network Interventions: Targeting Agents or Targeting Links?2026-09-05T12:15:08ZConsider a network game with linear best responses and spillovers between players, and let agents endogenously choose their links. A planner considers interventions to subsidize actions and/or links between players, aiming to maximize a welfare objective. The structure of an optimal intervention is shaped by the intrinsic value that links provide to agents. When this value is non-negative, it is optimal to focus only on subsidizing actions. When it is negative, we give conditions under which it is necessary to include link subsidies. This reverses the basic structure of the optimal intervention in settings with exogenous links.2026-02-13T12:59:13ZKrishna DasarathaAnant Shahhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11024v3Endogenous Attention and the Spread of False News (Extended Cut)2026-09-04T21:15:52ZWe study the impact of endogenous attention in a dynamic social media model. Each period, a user observes a random story and decides whether to share it. Users like sharing true and interesting stories, but identifying false stories requires costly attention. Depending on parameters, the system exhibits either a unique limit or strong path dependence. Endogenous attention responds to changes in false story credibility, so reducing credibility can boost their prevalence. Increases in the exogenous production rate of false stories can be amplified by users' sharing decisions. Increasing users' capacity to reach others amplifies both true and false stories; we identify conditions under which the net effect favors truth over falsehood.2024-06-16T17:46:27ZTuval DanenbergDrew Fudenberghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13327v3Breaking the Chain: Division Norms and Criminal Deterrence2026-09-04T18:58:43ZIn organized crime, membership moves fastest, deterrence capacity moves more slowly, and division norms move slowest. We model this in three stages: division norms fix how every possible coalition divides its proceeds; the authority then attaches deterrence capacity to named members before knowing which coalition will form; membership adjusts last, around whoever remains undeterred. Under population-monotone division, the minimum deterrence budget is the cost of a shortest dismantling path, removing one member at a time. When the Shapley value is population monotone, it uniquely maximizes this budget by making every path equally costly.2026-08-13T14:53:07ZConstantine SorokinAlexander NesterovAlexei Savvateev