https://arxiv.org/api/Q4yulpAeVlKriNuokveVxmdWLeQ 2026-06-21T20:41:16Z 4059 270 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22112v3 2026-05-06T17:04:26Z

I study symmetric competitions in which each player chooses an arbitrary distribution over a one-dimensional performance index, subject to a convex cost. I establish existence of a symmetric equilibrium, document various properties it must possess, and provide a characterization via the first-order approach. Manifold applications--to R\&D competition, oligopolistic competition with product design, and rank-order contests--follow.

2026-01-29T18:41:14Z Mark Whitmeyer http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15997v3 2026-05-06T09:38:51Z

We develop an efficient method for solving non-convex constrained optimization problems that are pervasive in economics. The optimal solution to these problems often involves randomization. We employ a Lagrangian framework and prove that the value of the saddle point characterizing the optimal random solution equals the value of the deterministic dual problem. Our algorithm solves this dual via subgradient descent and recovers the optimal random solution directly from deterministic optima computed along the iterations. For many non-convex economic problems, our method is orders of magnitude faster than linear programming, making previously intractable lottery problems feasible. As an application, we solve for optimal Mirrleesian income taxation with multi-dimensional types. We show that heterogeneity in productivity and Frisch elasticity can make randomization welfare-improving over the optimal deterministic schedule.

2025-04-22T16:03:09Z Chengfeng Shen Felix Kübler Yucheng Yang Zhennan Zhou http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08446v2 2026-05-06T08:51:30Z

Polarization and unexpected correlations between opinions on diverse topics (including in politics, culture and consumer choices) are an object of sustained attention. However, numerous theoretical models do not seem to convincingly explain these phenomena. This paper is motivated by a recent line of work, studying models where polarization can be explained in terms of biased assimilation and geometric interplay between opinions on various topics. The agent opinions are represented as unit vectors on a multidimensional sphere and updated according to geometric rules. In contrast to previous work, we focus on the classical opinion exchange setting, where the agents update their opinions in discrete time steps, with a pair of agents interacting randomly at every step. The opinions are updated according to an update rule belonging to a general class. Our findings are twofold. First, polarization appears to be ubiquitous in the class of models we study, requiring only relatively modest assumptions reflecting biased assimilation. Second, there is a qualitative difference between two-dimensional dynamics on the one hand, and three or more dimensions on the other. Accordingly, we prove almost sure polarization for a large class of update rules in two dimensions. Then, we prove polarization in three and more dimensions in more limited cases and try to shed light on central difficulties that are absent in two dimensions.

2024-02-13T13:30:45Z Abdou Majeed Alidou Júlia Baligács Max Hahn-Klimroth Jan Hązła Lukas Hintze Olga Scheftelowitsch http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02077v2 2026-05-05T18:52:40Z

In financial applications, latency advantages -- the ability to make decisions later than others, even without the ability to see what others have done -- can provide individual participants with an edge by allowing them to gather additional relevant information. For example, a trader who is able to act even milliseconds after another trader may receive information about changing prices on other exchanges that lets them make a profit at the expense of the latter. To better understand the economics of latency advantages, we consider a common-value auction with a reserve price in which some bidders may have more information about the value of the item than others, e.g., by bidding later. We provide a characterization of the equilibrium strategies, and study the welfare and auctioneer revenue implications of the last-mover advantage. We show that the auction does not degenerate completely and that the seller is still able to capture some value. We study comparative statics of the equilibrium under different assumptions about the nature of the latency advantage. Under the assumptions of the Black-Scholes model, we derive formulas for the last mover's expected profit, as well as for the sensitivity of that profit to their timing advantage. We apply our results to the design of blockchain protocols that aim to run auctions for financial assets on-chain, where incentives to increase timing advantages can put pressure on the decentralization of the system.

2025-04-02T19:25:04Z Ciamac C. Moallemi Mallesh M. Pai Dan Robinson http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.09918v4 2026-05-05T17:32:25Z

We study a class of finite-action disclosure games in which the sender's preferences are state-independent and the receiver's optimal action depends only on the expected state. While receiver-preferred equilibria in these games involve full revelation, other equilibria are less well understood. We show that any equilibrium payoff can be obtained with a disclosure strategy corresponding to a partition with a laminar structure that allows pooling of nonadjacent states. In a sender-preferred equilibrium, such a structure balances inducing more sender-favorable actions with deterring deviations. Leveraging this insight, we identify conditions under which the sender does not benefit from commitment power. We then apply these results to study selling with quality disclosure and influencing voters.

2022-06-20T17:57:56Z Denis Shishkin Maria Titova Kun Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03621v1 2026-05-05T10:48:40Z

A principal and $n\ge 2$ agents can launch a project if the principal proposes it and at least $k$ agents accept. Their individual payoffs from the project depend on an ex ante unknown state. The principal can conduct a test to learn about the state and then communicate her findings to the agents via cheap talk. This paper focuses on comparing two communication regimes: public and private messaging. We show that public messaging is weakly dominant: any outcome implementable under private messaging can also be implemented under public messaging. Moreover, in a canonical environment with linear payoffs, we characterize the principal's optimal test in each regime and show that public messaging can be strictly dominant if and only if there exist two agents who are the principal's conflicting allies.

2026-05-05T10:48:40Z Zhicheng Du Yingkai Li Boli Xu http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17948v10 2026-05-05T08:16:37Z

This paper studies decentralized re-equilibration following population shocks, such as worker exits or firm entries, in many-to-many matching markets with contracts under substitutable preferences. We show that restricting any pre-shock stable allocation to the surviving agents yields an element of a complete lattice of firm-quasi-stable allocations. On this lattice, the deferred acceptance algorithm operates as an asynchronous iteration of a monotone operator to restore stability. The induced re-equilibration map defines a join-semilattice homomorphism between the stability lattices of the original and perturbed markets, preserves the firm-optimal stable allocation across markets, and establishes an opposition of interests whereby incumbent workers are weakly better off and incumbent firms weakly worse off. Under the law of aggregate demand, the outcome simplifies to the join of the restricted pre-shock allocation and the firm-optimal stable allocation of the perturbed market. Consequently, each entering firm obtains its firm-optimal assignment, independent of the pre-shock equilibrium selection.

2023-05-29T08:13:11Z 26 pages Yi-You Yang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03307v1 2026-05-05T02:54:13Z

We develop a mechanism for unsecured lending among pseudonymous users that does not rely on collateral, legal identity, or centralized underwriting. New borrowers enter only through sponsors who delegate part of their own credit capacity, so onboarding a new account reallocates existing borrowing power rather than minting new capacity. Default losses flow back along the sponsor path, while repayment creates earned credit that expands future borrowing capacity. We prove that delegation conserves aggregate credit capacity, that revocation and default remain local to a unique sponsor path, and that a simple cap on earned-credit growth makes repay-then-default weakly unprofitable.

2026-05-05T02:54:13Z 7 pages, 1 figure Diego Estevez http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04996v2 2026-05-04T20:37:46Z

We study efficient, linear, and symmetric (ELS) values, a central family of allocation rules for cooperative games with transferable-utility (TU-games) that includes the Shapley value, the CIS value, and the ENSC value. We first show that every ELS value can be written as the Shapley value of a suitably transformed TU-game. We then introduce three types of invariance axioms for fixed player populations. The first type consists of composition axioms, and the second type is active-player consistency. Each of these two types yields a characterization of a subclass of the ELS values that contains the family of least-square values. Finally, the third type is nullified-game consistency: we define three such axioms, and each axiom yields a characterization of one of the Shapley, CIS, and ENSC values.

2025-11-07T05:52:03Z Yukihiko Funaki Yukio Koriyama Satoshi Nakada Yuki Tamura http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16898v4 2026-05-04T20:14:05Z

We propose a refinement of the maxmin approach to robustness. A mechanism's payoff guarantee over an ambiguity set is \emph{robust} if the guarantee is approximately satisfied at priors near the ambiguity set (in the weak topology). We show that many maxmin-optimal mechanisms in the literature give payoff guarantees that are not robust. Such mechanisms are often tailored to degenerate worst-case priors, making them simple but fragile. Conversely, some commonly used ambiguity sets satisfy a structural property which ensures that every associated payoff guarantee is robust. We show how any ambiguity set can be slightly enriched to satisfy this property.

2024-08-29T20:50:59Z Ian Ball Deniz Kattwinkel http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02865v1 2026-05-04T17:39:29Z

In a recent paper \cite{Redei-Jing2026} the notion of conditional $p$-inaccessibility of a decision based on utility maximization was defined and examples of conditionally $p$-inaccessible decisions were given. The conditional inaccessibility of a decision based on maximizing utility calculated by a probability measure $p^*$ expresses that the decision cannot be obtained if the expectation values of the utility functions are calculated using the (Jeffrey) conditional probability measure obtained by conditioning $p$ on partial evidence about the probability $p^*$ that determines the decision. The paper \cite{Redei-Jing2026} conjectured that conditionally $p$-inaccessible decisions exist in some probability spaces having arbitrary large finite number of elementary events. In this paper we prove that for any $p$ in any finite probability space there exist an uncountable number of probability measures $p^*$ for each of which there exist an uncountable number of pairs of utility functions that represent conditionally $p$-inaccessible decisions. If $p^*$ is an objective probability determining objectively good decisions and $p$ is the subjective probability determining a rational decision of a decision making Agent, the result says that there is an enormous number of decision situations in which the Agent's subjective probability prohibits the Agent's informed rational decision to be objectively good.

2026-05-04T17:39:29Z Zalán Gyenis Miklós Rédei Leszek Wroński http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02817v1 2026-05-04T16:53:24Z

We show that a large effective number of commodities can be a source of equilibrium stability and uniqueness: expanding substitution opportunities strengthens aggregate substitution effects. We study finite dated-commodity exchange economies obtained by truncating a countably infinite-horizon environment with discounted, additively separable utilities. In this setting, the effective number of commodities is the discounted count of dated commodities, so greater patience makes distant commodities more relevant. With an appropriate normalization, equilibrium substitution effects accumulate at the rate of the effective number of commodities. When a preference diversification condition holds, equilibrium income effects grow at a lower rate. The condition is satisfied, for example, when agents have sparse or localized taste differences across commodities, or when their taste profiles become sufficiently heterogeneous as the commodity space expands. Hence, whenever the effective number of commodities is sufficiently large, every equilibrium is locally tâtonnement stable, which in turn implies equilibrium uniqueness.

2026-05-04T16:53:24Z 40 pages Xinyang Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02756v1 2026-05-04T15:56:40Z

We study the emergence of conformity preferences in an environment in which agents choose effort under heterogeneous, possibly misspecified returns, and social interactions do not directly affect material payoffs. Some agents choose effort by trading off performance and conformity to expected peer behavior. We characterize subjective best responses. For any given beliefs, an optimal and unique level of peer pressure exists and is evolutionarily stable within groups of agents sharing the same misspecification. Such a level is zero for correctly specified agents and may be positive for misspecified ones. When the efficient level of peer pressure is interior, misspecified agents choose effort equal to their true return, resulting in an equilibrium behavior that is both self-confirming and Nash, allowing the persistence of misspecifications. Peer pressure need not generate long-run allocative distortions, but it creates a perceived value of social information. In equilibrium, this value depends only on misspecification, generating scope for informational rents.

2026-05-04T15:56:40Z Paolo Pin Roberto Rozzi http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02681v1 2026-05-04T15:00:32Z

We present two new classes of causal models of decision-making agents. Our approach is motivated by the needs of modeling the economics of computing systems. These systems are composed of subsystems and can exhibit endogenous limits on cognitive resources and value discounting. Structural Causal Decision Models (SCDMs) expand on Structural Causal Influence Models. Like SCIMs, they explicitly represent the causal relationships between model variables and the payoffs of agent decisions. Additionally, agent decisions can be constrained by their causal antecedents, and SCDMs can have open root variables for which no probability distribution or structural equation is given. We show that SCDMs have a well-defined and computationally useful property of composability. Building on SCDMs, we then define a Structural Causal Decision Process (SCDP) as a recurring SCDM with a discount variable. SCDPs benefit from the useful composition properties of SCDMs. Moreover, SCDPs are strictly more expressive than POMDPs because they do not assume rational belief formation. Indeed, an SCDP can endogenously model the memory-formation process, and is thus useful for modeling resource rational agents in dynamic settings. SCDPs are also capable of modeling variable discounting, a tool used widely in social scientific modeling. We pose that SCDPs are a useful framework for policy simulation for the digital economy, mechanism design for information systems, and digital twin modeling of cyberinfrastructure.

2026-05-04T15:00:32Z Sebastian Benthall Alan Lujan http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12073v3 2026-05-04T12:40:59Z

This paper analytically demonstrates that, in a Two-Agent New Keynesian model with Rotemberg-type price and wage rigidities, monetary transmission can be amplified when two mechanisms are sufficiently strong: the heterogeneity-induced IS-slope effect and the price-stickiness channel. We also show when amplification weakens or disappears, most notably under pure wage stickiness, where the price channel shuts down and the heterogeneity-driven term vanishes. The framework features household heterogeneity between savers and hand-to-mouth households and is derived from microeconomic foundations while avoiding restrictive assumptions on relative wages or labor supply across types that are common in prior analytical work. The closed-form solution makes transparent how price stickiness, wage stickiness, and the share of hand-to-mouth households jointly shape amplification. We further derive a modified aggregate welfare loss function that quantifies how heterogeneity, operating through distributional effects from firm profits, changes the relative importance of stabilizing inflation. Overall, the tractable yet micro-founded analytical framework clarifies the interaction between household heterogeneity and nominal rigidities and identifies sufficient conditions under which monetary policy gains or loses traction.

2025-08-16T15:15:11Z 42 pages, 15 figures Kenji Miyazaki