https://arxiv.org/api/XwMkgRQRdERrnrnic80V0hwOttU 2026-06-21T19:34:07Z 4059 255 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02948v3 2026-05-09T12:47:13Z

Patients often avoid medical tests because testing produces not only useful information but also painful beliefs. This paper studies optimal communication between a doctor and an information-avoidant patient who first decides whether to take a test and, after an unfavorable result, whether to accept treatment. The doctor can disclose information about how severe non-treatment would be if the patient is sick. The main tension is between warning and reassurance. A warning can make treatment compelling after diagnosis, but reassurance can make testing acceptable by preserving hope about the untreated prospect. I characterize the optimal policy. When the warning that supports treatment is compatible with testing, the doctor uses warning-in-advance. When such warning would deter testing, the doctor constructs an information greenhouse: a committed post-test information environment that reassures the patient about the untreated prospect. With voluntary consultation, reassurance must sometimes be moved before the test as precautionary comfort.

2024-07-03T09:31:19Z Zhuo Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20281v3 2026-05-08T13:22:18Z

We study incentive design when multiple principals simultaneously design mechanisms for their respective teams in environments with strategic spillovers. In this environment, each principal's set of incentive-compatible mechanisms--those that satisfy their own agents' incentive compatibility constraints--depends on the mechanisms offered by the other teams. Following a classic example by Myerson (1982), such games may lack equilibrium due to discontinuities in the correspondence of incentive-compatible mechanisms. We establish general conditions for equilibrium existence by introducing a novel approach that involves tracking both the outcome distributions along the truthful-obedient path and the sets of outcome distributions achievable through unilateral deviations, thereby providing a foundation for analyzing a wide range of multi-principal mechanism design with team production and agency problems.

2026-02-23T19:09:05Z Brian Roberson http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07671v1 2026-05-08T12:42:28Z

Eliciting truthful reports from autonomous agents is a core problem in scalable AI oversight: a principal scores the agent's report using a strictly proper scoring rule, but the agent also benefits from the report through a non-accuracy channel (approval for autonomous action, allocation share, downstream control). The same structure appears in classical mechanism-design settings such as marketplace operation. Our main result is an endogeneity: the principal's optimal oversight necessarily uses a non-affine approval function to screen types, yet any non-affine approval makes truthful reporting suboptimal under the combined objective whenever deviation is undetectable. The principal cannot avoid the perturbation that undermines calibration. This impossibility holds for all strictly proper scoring rules, with a closed-form perturbation formula. A constructive escape exists: a step-function approval threshold achieves first-best screening for every strictly proper scoring rule, because the agent's binary inflate-or-not choice creates a type-space threshold regardless of the generator's curvature. Under the Brier score specifically, the type-independent inflation cost yields a welfare equivalence between second-best and first-best; we prove this equivalence is unique to Brier (the welfare gap under smooth $C^1$ oversight is bounded below by $Ω(\text{Var}(1/G'') (γ/β)^2)$ for every non-Brier rule). Two instances develop the framework: AI agent oversight (the lead motivating setting) and marketplace operation (a parallel mechanism-design domain). The message for AI alignment is direct: smooth scoring-based oversight cannot elicit truthful reports from a strategic agent; sharp thresholds are the calibration-preserving design.

2026-05-08T12:42:28Z 38 pages, no figures. Targeting ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation (TEAC); preprint Lauri Lovén Sasu Tarkoma http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07528v1 2026-05-08T09:57:37Z

We propose an aggregate notion of non-transferable utility (NTU) stability for decentralized matching markets with fixed prices, where market clearing is achieved through one-sided money burning, which can be interpreted as waiting. Agents are grouped into observable types and are indifferent among individuals within type; equilibrium is defined at the type level and delivers equal indirect utility within each type. We introduce money burning into two types of NTU models: In a deterministic model, we relate our notion to classical Gale--Shapley stability and show how money burning decentralizes stable outcomes under aggregation. We then introduce separable random utility, obtaining an NTU counterpart to Choo and Siow (2006). We prove the existence and uniqueness of equilibrium and provide a stationary queueing interpretation. Finally, we develop a generalized deferred acceptance algorithm based on alternating constrained discrete-choice problems and prove its convergence to the unique equilibrium.

2026-05-08T09:57:37Z Alfred Galichon Yu-Wei Hsieh Antoine Jacquet http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07469v1 2026-05-08T09:17:17Z

We study which outcomes are implementable by disclosing coarse statistics of a data-generating process rather than its full distribution. Players observe data whose joint distribution is only partially known: they know the expectations of finitely many random variables and form beliefs by maximum-entropy inference. We obtain two characterizations. When message spaces are unrestricted, implementable outcomes coincide with jointly coherent outcomes, expanding the set of correlated equilibria. With canonical mechanisms, implementability reduces to a single cross-entropy condition: the target outcome must lie on the cross-entropy level set of some correlated equilibrium that passes through that equilibrium itself. Examples and several classes of games illustrate the reach of the framework.

2026-05-08T09:17:17Z Francesco Giordano http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07377v1 2026-05-08T07:32:27Z

This paper develops a two-period dynastic overlapping-generations (OLG) model in which parents simultaneously choose consumption, savings, fertility, and three distinct dimensions of child quality-education, physical health, and mental health-under a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) pension system. The central innovation is modelling mental health as an independent productivity-enhancing input with its own elasticity $θ$ in a Cobb-Douglas human-capital technology. This yields simple proportional allocation rules and shows how pension policy affects not only the overall level but also the composition of human capital investments. In steady state, higher PAYG contribution rates raise fertility through the Yakita effect but crowd out per-child investments in all quality dimensions, including mental health. An increase in the mental-health elasticity $θ$ shifts resources toward non-cognitive skill development while reducing fertility. These results reveal a fundamental policy tension for developing economies: pension systems that rely on children for old-age support simultaneously increase birth rates while reducing long-term human capital formation, with disproportionate effects on non-cognitive skills. The framework provides theoretical guidance for complementary policies that protect mental-health investments, with particular relevance for countries such as India where children remain a primary source of retirement security and mental-health services are underfunded.

2026-05-08T07:32:27Z Accepted at the CDE-IEDS International Conference 2026, Delhi School of Economics (DSE), University of Delhi. 9 pages, 1 table Sushmita Kumari Siddharth Gavhale http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06987v1 2026-05-07T22:05:23Z

Aligning large language models (LLMs) to human preferences typically relies on aggregating pooled feedback into a single reward model. However, this standard approach assumes that all labelers share the same underlying preferences, ignoring the fact that real-world labelers are highly heterogeneous and usually anonymous. Consequently, relying solely on binary choice data fundamentally distorts the learned policy, making the true population-average preference unidentifiable. To overcome this critical limitation, we demonstrate that augmenting preference datasets with a simple, secondary signal -- the user's response time -- can restore the identifiability of the population's average preference. By modeling each decision as a Drift-Diffusion Model (DDM), we introduce a novel, consistent estimator of heterogeneous preferences that successfully corrects the distortions of standard choice-only labels. We prove that our estimator asymptotically converges to the true average preference even in extreme cases where each anonymous labeler contributes only a single choice. Empirically, across both synthetic and real-world datasets, our method consistently outperforms standard baselines that otherwise fail and plateau at a bias floor. Because response times are essentially free to record and require zero user tracking or identification, our results bring promises and open up new opportunities for future data-collection pipelines to improve the social benefit without requiring user-level identifiers or repeated elicitations.

2026-05-07T22:05:23Z Federico Echenique Alireza Fallah Baihe Huang Michael I. Jordan http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12456v4 2026-05-07T19:22:28Z

Existing auction mechanisms are vulnerable to bidder collusion, which substantially degrades revenue and non-colluder welfare. To design truthful mechanisms resilient to collusion, we introduce a novel approach that leverages a machine learning classifier to predict (even imprecisely) which bidders are colluding. We first establish a Bulow-Klemperer-type result for multi-unit auctions with single-minded bidders, demonstrating that collusion significantly harms existing mechanisms only when the colluding coalition is large. Consequently, we focus our design on settings with many colluders. Building on the welfare-optimal Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism, we propose two novel truthful mechanisms: VCG-Posted Price (V-PoP) and Conditional-Posted Price (C-PoP). V-PoP applies VCG to non-colluding bidders and posted prices to colluding ones, and ensuring truthfulness is non-trivial because we must dynamically split the quantity of items between these groups based on the values of the non-colluder bids. C-PoP further advances this by computing a posted price conditioned on non-colluder bids, and ensuring truthfulness is non-obvious because the posted price is chosen using the values of the non-colluder bids. Because real-world classifiers make errors, we provide theoretical lower bounds on the auction price of V-PoP and C-PoP under misclassification, which theory shows acts as a proxy for welfare and revenue. Crucially, our bounds yield actionable insights for classifier design, revealing that false negatives (misclassifying colluders as non-colluders) are preferable to false positives (misclassifying non-colluders as colluders). Numerical experiments demonstrate that our mechanisms achieve high welfare and revenue against collusion, even when utilizing simple, low-cost classifiers.

2025-11-16T04:57:20Z Sukanya Kudva Edward Dowling Anil Aswani http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05515v3 2026-05-07T18:19:45Z

Cursed Equilibrium of Eyster and Rabin (2005) has been a leading theory for explaining winner's-curse-type behavior in static Bayesian games, but it faces conceptual limitations when applied to dynamic games. Two recent extensions, Cursed Sequential Equilibrium (CSE) by Fong, Lin and Palfrey (2025) and Sequential Cursed Equilibrium (SCE) by Cohen and Li (2026), address these limitations in fundamentally different ways. Complementing these two papers, this paper provides a systematic comparison of CSE and SCE, clarifying their conceptual foundations and technical implications, including their notions of cursedness, belief updating, and treatment of public histories.

2023-04-11T21:48:23Z 33 pages, 4 figures and 1 table Meng-Jhang Fong Po-Hsuan Lin Thomas R. Palfrey http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06525v1 2026-05-07T16:31:12Z

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to provide instructions to many agents who interact with one another. Such shared reliance couples agents who appear to act independently: they may in fact be guided by a common model. This coupling can change the prospects for cooperation among agents with misaligned incentives. We study settings in which multiple LLMs each advise a population of clients who participate in instances of an underlying game, creating strategic interaction at the level of the LLMs themselves. This induces a meta-game among the LLMs, mediated through clients. We first analyze the one-shot setting, where shared instructions can change equilibrium behavior only when an LLM may influence more than one role in the same interaction; in such cases, cooperation may emerge, and the effect of client share can be beneficial, harmful, or non-monotone, depending on the base game. Our main result concerns the repeated setting. We prove a folk theorem for LLMs: despite indirect observation and the clients' inability to identify which LLM advised their opponents, all feasible and individually rational outcomes can be sustained as $\varepsilon$-equilibria. The result does not follow from the standard folk theorem and requires new proof techniques. Together, these results show that shared LLM guidance can sustain cooperation among populations of agents even when the underlying incentives are misaligned.

2026-05-07T16:31:12Z Jonathan Shaki Eden Hartman Sarit Kraus Yonatan Aumann http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06451v1 2026-05-07T15:46:34Z

The existence of EFX allocations is a fundamental question in fair division. In this paper, we construct a three-agent, eight-good instance with monotone subadditive valuations such that no allocation satisfies $α$-EFX for any $α> \frac{1}{\sqrt[6]{2}} \approx 0.89$. We also provide a closely related three-agent, eight-good instance with submodular (in fact weighted coverage) valuations for which no EFX allocation exists. A key feature of our construction is its symmetry: the agents' valuations are identical up to a relabeling of the goods. Thus, EFX can fail even when agents differ only in how the goods are labeled. This symmetry makes the counterexamples compact and human-verifiable, yielding simple combinatorial obstructions to the existence of EFX.

2026-05-07T15:46:34Z Simon Mackenzie Mashbat Suzuki http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02776v2 2026-05-07T08:02:03Z

This paper studies how the possibility of strategic misreporting shapes endogenous communication networks. Agents observe noisy private signals about a common state, form costly communication links, exchange private messages with their neighbors, and then choose actions. Payoffs reward both accuracy and coordination with linked agents. A link is valuable because it gives access to information, but it is useful only if the induced local information structure makes truthful transmission incentive compatible. We show that clique components support truthful communication: within a clique, all members observe the same profile of local signals, choose the same posterior action, and therefore have no incentive to distort reports. With heterogeneous signal precisions and convex linking costs, the core selects assortative information clubs ordered by signal precision. These stable truthful networks need not be socially efficient. Because the informational value of precision is decreasing, concentrating high-precision agents in the same club may be privately stable but socially dominated by more mixed partitions.

2026-05-04T16:19:18Z Paolo Pin http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15861v2 2026-05-07T04:25:38Z

We study the evolution of behavioral rules in environments with multiple contexts. Agents copy rules used by better-performing peers in the same context and apply them across contexts. Multiple contexts turn discrete-time imitation dynamics into a context-weighted social choice problem: the population converges to consensus if and only if some rule is a Condorcet winner; otherwise, persistent non-convergence can occur. Among same-context imitation protocols, imitate-if-better uniquely minimizes envy. The framework provides a new account of belief evolution, characterizing when imitation selects rational expectations and showing how persistent belief and consumption fluctuations can arise in stationary environments.

2023-10-24T14:21:52Z substantially revised, and the title is updated. 37 pages. Comments are very welcomed Enrique Urbano Arellano Xinyang Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05292v6 2026-05-07T03:17:08Z

This paper studies a mathematical model of city formation by migration of firms and workers. The Core-Periphery model in the new economic geography, which considers the single migration of workers driven by real wage inequality among regions, is extended to incorporate the migration of firms driven by real profit inequality among regions. In this dual migration model, it is found that the behavior of the solutions is qualitatively similar to that of solutions of the single migration model, which is frequently used in the new economic geography (NEG). That is, 1) spatially homogeneous distributions of firms and workers become destabilized and eventually form several cities where both firms and workers agglomerate; 2) The number of cities decreases as transport costs decrease. The results have provided a more general theoretical justification for the use of the single migration models in NEG.

2023-11-09T11:42:42Z 37 pages, 27 figures Kensuke Ohtake http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05521v1 2026-05-06T23:36:56Z

Counterfactual utilities evaluate decisions not only by the realized outcome under a given decision, but also by the counterfactual outcomes that would arise under alternative decisions. By generalizing standard utility frameworks, they allow decision-makers to encode asymmetric criteria, such as avoiding harm and anticipating regret. Recent work, however, has raised fundamental concerns about the coherence and transitivity of counterfactual utilities. We address these concerns by extending the von Neumann-Morgenstern (vNM) framework to preferences defined on the extended space of all potential outcomes rather than realized outcomes alone. We show that expected counterfactual utility satisfies the vNM axioms on this extended domain, thereby admitting a coherent preference representation. We further examine how counterfactual preferences map onto the realized outcome space through menu-dependent and context-dependent projections. This axiomatic framework reconciles apparent inconsistencies highlighted by the Russian roulette example in the statistics literature and resolves the well-known Allais paradox from behavioral economics. We also derive an additional axiom required to reduce counterfactual utilities to standard utilities on the same potential outcome space, and establish an axiomatic foundation for additive counterfactual utilities, which satisfy a necessary and sufficient condition for point identification. Finally, we show that our results hold regardless of whether individual potential outcomes are deterministic or stochastic.

2026-05-06T23:36:56Z Benedikt Koch Kosuke Imai Tomasz Strzalecki