https://arxiv.org/api/zY/e4u6fRUCdBqSfKRovnJYpnGQ 2026-03-26T18:58:04Z 3826 240 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07008v7 2026-02-09T09:13:58Z

This paper adapts ideas from social identity theory to set out a new framework for modelling conspicuous consumption. Agents derive utility from their consumption of a status good and from belonging to an identity group with high status good consumption. Importantly, these two sources of utility are substitutes. Agents also feel pressure to conform with their neighbours in a network. This framework can rationalise a set of seemingly conflicting stylised facts about conspicuous consumption that are currently explained by different families of models. In addition, our model delivers new testable predictions regarding the effect of network structure and income inequality on conspicuous consumption.

2023-03-13T11:06:46Z Alastair Langtry Christian Ghiglino http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08074v1 2026-02-08T18:07:58Z

Once failure is irreversible, continuation payoffs cannot be meaningfully aggregated across strategies that differ in their survival properties. Standard scalar evaluation sidesteps this by arbitrarily completing payoffs beyond termination, but such completions are extrinsic to the game form. This paper introduces continuation-performance decomposition (CPD), proving that any evaluation satisfying natural regularity conditions, such as failure-completion invariance, survival locality, and local expected-utility coherence -- must separate continuation from performance lexicographically. Continuation priority thus emerges as a consequence of well-posed evaluation, not as a behavioral assumption. We establish equivalence between CPD and the limit of games with diverging failure penalties, show that viability is a game-form invariant independent of payoffs, and apply the framework to bank runs: preemptive withdrawals reflect rational viability vetoes rather than coordination failure when continuation is distributively asymmetric. CPD resolves a representational problem, not a preference problem.

2026-02-08T18:07:58Z Nicholas H. Kirk http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08035v1 2026-02-08T16:10:46Z

We develop a general framework for incorporating distributional preferences in market design. We identify the structural properties of these preferences that guarantee the path independence of choice rules. In decentralized settings, a greedy rule uniquely maximizes these preferences; in centralized markets, the associated deferred-acceptance mechanism uniquely implements them. This framework subsumes canonical models, such as reserves and matroids, while accommodating complex objectives involving intersectional identities that lie beyond the scope of existing approaches. Our analysis provides unified axiomatic foundations and comparative statics for a broad class of distributional policies.

2026-02-08T16:10:46Z Federico Echenique Teddy Mekonnen M. Bumin Yenmez http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21573v2 2026-02-07T18:55:22Z

Building on the generalized hedonic-linear model of Pellegrino (2025), this paper studies optimal product differentiation when a representative consumer has preferences over product characteristics. Under multiproduct monopoly, the monopolist's choice of product characteristics is always aligned with the social planner's optimum, despite underproduction. By contrast, under oligopoly, multiple equilibria can arise that differ qualitatively in their patterns of characteristics design. We show that, while oligopoly equilibria exhibiting product differentiation yield higher welfare than those with product concentration, the degree of product differentiation under oligopoly remains below the socially optimal level. As a result, social welfare under oligopoly is typically lower than under monopoly, highlighting a key advantage of coordination in characteristics design. We extend the analysis to settings with overlapping ownership structures and show that common ownership can improve welfare by inducing firms to soften competition through increased product differentiation rather than output reduction.

2026-01-29T11:34:58Z Masaki Miyashita http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07451v4 2026-02-07T18:30:27Z

We study random-turn resource-allocation games. In the Trail of Lost Pennies, a counter moves on $\mathbb{Z}$. At each turn, Maxine stakes $a \in [0,\infty)$ and Mina $b \in [0,\infty)$. The counter $X$ then moves adjacently, to the right with probability $\tfrac{a}{a+b}$. If $X_i \to -\infty$ in this infinte-turn game, Mina receives one unit, and Maxine zero; if $X_i \to \infty$, then these receipts are zero and $x$. Thus the net receipt to a given player is $-A+B$, where $A$ is the sum of her stakes, and $B$ is her terminal receipt. The game was inspired by unbiased tug-of-war in~[PSSW] from 2009 but in fact closely resembles the original version of tug-of-war, introduced [HarrisVickers87] in the economics literature in 1987. We show that the game has surprising features. For a natural class of strategies, Nash equilibria exist precisely when $x$ lies in $[λ,λ^{-1}]$, for a certain $λ\in (0,1)$. We indicate that $λ$ is remarkably close to one, proving that $λ\leq 0.999904$ and presenting clear numerical evidence that $λ\geq 1 - 10^{-4}$. For each $x \in [λ,λ^{-1}]$, we find countably many Nash equilibria. Each is roughly characterized by an integral {\em battlefield} index: when the counter is nearby, both players stake intensely, with rapid but asymmetric decay in stakes as it moves away. Our results advance premises [HarrisVickers87,Konrad12] for fund management and the incentive-outcome relation that plausibly hold for many player-funded stake-governed games. Alongside a companion treatment [HP22] of games with allocated budgets, we thus offer a detailed mathematical treatment of an illustrative class of tug-of-war games. We also review the separate developments of tug-of-war in economics and mathematics in the hope that mathematicians direct further attention to tug-of-war in its original resource-allocation guise.

2022-09-15T16:54:31Z 94 pages with five figures. In monograph format with extended title, with an overview of the economics and mathematics literature of tug-of-war. Revision based on referee report Alan Hammond http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08300v4 2026-02-07T18:08:09Z

In tug-of-war, two players compete by moving a counter along edges of a graph, each winning the right to move at a given turn according to the flip of a possibly biased coin. The game ends when the counter reaches the boundary, a fixed subset of the vertices, at which point one player pays the other an amount determined by the boundary vertex. Economists and mathematicians have independently studied tug-of-war for many years, focussing respectively on resource-allocation forms of the game, in which players iteratively spend precious budgets in an effort to influence the bias of the coins that determine the turn victors; and on PDE arising in fine mesh limits of the constant-bias game in a Euclidean setting. In this article, we offer a mathematical treatment of a class of tug-of-war games with allocated budgets: each player is initially given a fixed budget which she draws on throughout the game to offer a stake at the start of each turn, and her probability of winning the turn is the ratio of her stake and the sum of the two stakes. We consider the game played on a tree, with boundary being the set of leaves, and the payment function being the indicator of a single distinguished leaf. We find the game value and the essentially unique Nash equilibrium of a leisurely version of the game, in which the move at any given turn is cancelled with constant probability after stakes have been placed. We show that the ratio of the players' remaining budgets is maintained at its initial value $λ$; game value is a biased infinity harmonic function; and the proportion of remaining budget that players stake at a given turn is given in terms of the spatial gradient and the $λ$-derivative of game value. We also indicate examples in which the solution takes a different form in the non-leisurely game.

2022-06-16T17:00:49Z 72 pages with four figures. Sections 4 and 5 revised Yujie Fu Alan Hammond Gábor Pete http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07634v1 2026-02-07T17:27:37Z

This paper develops a theory of learning under ambiguity induced by the decision maker's beliefs about the collection of data correlated with the true state of the world. Within our framework, two classical results on Bayesian learning extend to the setting with ambiguity: experiments are equivalent to distributions over posterior beliefs, and Blackwell's more informative and more valuable orders coincide. When applied to the setting of robust Bayesian analysis, our results clarify the source of time inconsistency in the Gamma-minimax problem and provide an argument in favor of the conditional Gamma-minimax criterion. We also apply our results to a persuasion game to illustrate that our model provides a natural benchmark for communication under ambiguity.

2026-02-07T17:27:37Z 42 pages, 2 figures Cheaheon Lim http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07542v1 2026-02-07T13:36:14Z

Prophet inequalities bound the expected reward that can be obtained in a stopping problem by the optimal reward of its corresponding off-line version. We propose a systematic technique for deriving prophet inequalities for stopping problems associated with selecting a point in a polyhedron. It utilizes a reduced-form linear programming representation of the stopping problem. We illustrate the technique to derive a number of known results as well as some new ones. For instance, we prove a $\frac{1}{2}$-prophet inequality when the underlying polyhedron is an on-line polymatroid; one whose underlying submodular function depends upon the realized rewards. We also demonstrate a composition by the Minkowski sum property. If an $r-$ prophet inequality holds for polyhedra $P^1$ and $P^2$, it also holds for their Minkowski sum.

2026-02-07T13:36:14Z Halil I. Bayrak Mustafa Ç. Pınar Rakesh Vohra http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18884v6 2026-02-06T22:20:18Z

I study reputation formation in repeated games where player actions endogenously determine the probability the game permanently ends. Permanent exit can render reputation useless even to a patient long-lived player whose actions are perfectly monitored, in stark contrast to canonical commitment payoff theorems. However, I identify tight conditions for the long-run player to attain their Stackelberg payoff in all Markov equilibrium. Along the way, I highlight the role of Markov strategies in pinning down the value of reputation formation. I apply my results to give conditional commitment foundations for the infinite chain-store game. I also analyze repeated global games with exit, and obtain new predictions about regime survival.

2024-04-29T17:19:24Z Daniel Luo http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06525v3 2026-02-06T18:43:13Z

We study monopoly regulation under asymmetric information about costs when subsidies are infeasible. A monopolist with privately known marginal cost serves a single product market and sets a price. The regulator maximizes a weighted welfare function using unit taxes as sole policy instrument. We identify a sufficient and necessary condition for when laissez-faire is optimal. When intervention is desired, we provide simple sufficient conditions under which the optimal policy is a progressive price cap: prices below a benchmark face no tax, while higher prices are taxed at increasing and potentially prohibitive rates. This policy combines delegation at low prices with taxation at high prices, balancing access, affordability, and profitability. Our results clarify when taxes act as complements to subsidies and when they serve only as imperfect substitutes, illuminating how feasible policy instruments shape optimal regulatory design.

2025-12-06T18:25:09Z Jiaming Wei Dihan Zou http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11183v6 2026-02-06T15:10:22Z

An agent engages in sequential search and learns about the quality of sampled goods through signals purchased from profit-maximizing information broker(s). We study how the market structure--the number of competing brokers--shapes the pricing and design of information, as well as the resulting welfare outcomes. We characterize the equilibrium payoff set, and show that when the agent's search cost falls below a threshold, market structure affects neither how much surplus is generated in equilibrium nor how it is divided. Above this threshold, however, competition yields equilibrium outcomes that raise the agent's payoff but reduce total surplus relative to any monopoly equilibrium outcome. Methodologically, we extend the classic theory of repeated games to stopping problems, such as sequential search.

2024-11-17T21:57:45Z Teddy Mekonnen Bobak Pakzad-Hurson http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06672v1 2026-02-06T12:58:40Z

We study future-blind preferences, which are preferences that heavily discount the future, within the space of infinite consumption streams. We give two definitions: $N$-blindness, where agents ignore periods beyond a fixed date $N$, and eventual blindness, where all but finitely many dates are neglected. Using a topological approach, we show that the finest topology ensuring eventual blindness coincides with the product topology. This provides a behavioral foundation for continuity in the product topology, which was considered for studying equilibrium existence in infinite-dimensional spaces. Finally, we characterize the dual spaces under these topologies.

2026-02-06T12:58:40Z Marcel Andrade Lorenzo Bastianello Jaime Orrillo http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09835v2 2026-02-06T12:56:57Z

In a strand of the literature, it is assumed that the common prior has full support; that is, every type of every player is assigned positive probability. Morris (1991,1994) established an epistemological-behavioral duality characterisation of the common prior with full support, showing that a finite type space admits such a prior if and only if it contains no acceptable bet. This result forms the basis of the present paper. The paper makes three contributions: (1) The characterisation of Morris (1991,Morris1994) is extended to infinite type spaces. (2) The extension is robust: it does not depend on whether the infinite model applies countably additive or purely additive probabilities as beliefs. (3) The analysis implies that the notion of a real common prior-understood as a single probability distribution or a set of probability distributions-is not necessarily meaningful.

2025-01-16T20:52:37Z Ziv Hellman Miklós Pintér http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06582v1 2026-02-06T10:22:41Z

In rank aggregation, the goal is to combine multiple input rankings into a single output ranking. In this paper, we analyze rank aggregation methods, so-called social welfare functions (SWFs), with respect to strategyproofness, which requires that no agent can misreport his ranking to obtain an output ranking that is closer to his true ranking in terms of the Kemeny distance. As our main result, we show that no anonymous SWF satisfies unanimity and strategyproofness when there are at least four alternatives. This result is proven by SAT solving, a computer-aided theorem proving technique, and verified by Isabelle, a highly trustworthy interactive proof assistant. Further, we prove by hand that strategyproofness is incompatible with majority consistency, a variant of Condorcet-consistency for SWFs. Lastly, we show that all SWFs in two natural classes have a large incentive ratio and are thus highly manipulable.

2026-02-06T10:22:41Z Published as full paper at AAMAS 2026 Manuel Eberl Patrick Lederer http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02243v2 2026-02-05T21:19:08Z

We develop a mathematical framework for the optimal scheduling of flexible water desalination plants (WDPs) as hybrid generator-load resources. WDPs integrate thermal generation, membrane-based controllable loads, and renewable energy sources, offering unique operational flexibility for power system operations. They can simultaneously participate in two markets: selling desalinated water to a water utility, and bidirectionally transacting electricity with the grid based on their net electricity demand. We formulate the scheduling decision problem of a profit-maximizing WDP, capturing operational, technological, and market-based coupling between water and electricity flows. The threshold-based structure we derive provides computationally tractable coordination suitable for large-scale deployment, offering operational insights into how thermal generation and membrane-based loads complementarily provide continuous bidirectional flexibility. The thresholds are analytically characterized in closed form as explicit functions of technology and tariff parameters. We examine how small changes in the exogenous tariff and technology parameters affect the WDP's profit. Extensive simulations illustrate the optimal WDP's operation, profit, and water-electricity exchange, demonstrating significant improvements relative to benchmark algorithms.

2026-01-05T16:19:30Z 14 pages, 7 figures, 1 table Ahmed S. Alahmed Audun Botterud Saurabh Amin Ali T. Al-Awami