https://arxiv.org/api/00M/qf++N0U94VI7RTrXVo1vixc 2026-06-21T15:57:14Z 4059 210 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17388v1 2026-05-17T11:12:45Z

Health artificial intelligence (AI) adoption presents a paradox: point-solution tools diffuse readily through clinical populations, yet system-change AI, which carries the greatest potential for pathway-level transformation, consistently stalls at partial adoption. An evolutionary game theoretic model is developed to explain this pattern. Doctors choose among three strategies: genuine adoption, partial adoption, and rejection, where genuine adoption is required for systemic benefits to materialise above a population threshold. The system is shown to be generically bistable, with a stable partial adoption equilibrium coexisting alongside full genuine adoption. The basin of attraction of the partial adoption trap is enlarged by three compounding failure modes: a threshold coordination failure arising from the non-appropriable nature of systemic benefits; a trust failure arising from the organisation's inability to credibly commit to sharing productivity gains; and a cultural failure arising from negative coordination norms among doctors. These failure modes are shown to be most severe precisely for the technologies with the greatest systemic value: the Value-Adoption Paradox. A cost ratchet dynamic implies that failed adoption attempts permanently lower barriers even when embedding fails, but this benefit is offset when trust erosion is rapid. Conditions are derived under which sustained but imperfect adoption pressure is welfare-improving, and the policy architecture required to escape the trap (targeting trust, sequencing, and team-level adoption) is characterised. Standard health system digital transformation policy, which typically addresses only the threshold failure through individual incentives, is predicted to systematically produce the partial adoption trap.

2026-05-17T11:12:45Z Ari Ercole http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.02576v3 2026-05-17T07:04:30Z

Algorithmic pricing raises a question of interpretation as well as intervention: when autonomous deep-learning pricing systems sustain supracompetitive prices, what strategic pattern have they learned, and how might market institutions alter it? This paper develops an interpretable framework for studying learned collusion in repeated pricing environments. The framework embeds strategic deep learning networks in a differentiated-products Bertrand market and compresses recent price histories into finite states that record price levels, rival price movements, and movement persistence. This state representation preserves the dynamic information relevant for reward and punishment while making learned behavior economically interpretable. In the baseline environment, agents learn supracompetitive prices and exhibit a coherent collusive asymmetry: they punish rival price cuts and accommodate rival price increases. The paper then uses this framework to study an order-book mechanism that assembles temporary buyer commitments and allocates them to sellers willing to make sufficiently deep undercuts, partially insulating those undercutters from retaliatory punishment. The mechanism lowers realized prices in the main symmetric-cost design and remains effective in the main robustness exercises. Further analysis shows that this price reduction operates through the intended channel: qualifying undercuts become less exposed to subsequent punishment, reducing the continuation loss that sustains high-price states. The results show how interpretable learning frameworks can connect algorithmic pricing outcomes to economic mechanisms, and how market design can target the enforcement channel behind learned collusion.

2023-03-05T04:11:28Z Soumen Banerjee http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16926v1 2026-05-16T10:37:06Z

We extend the concept of meta-Nash equilibrium, introduced by Eshaghi Gordji and Bagha [2026] for complete-information games, to environments with incomplete information. We define a meta-Bayesian Nash equilibrium as a profile of type-dependent mixed meta-strategies together with an environmental move such that no player type can profitably deviate and the environment cannot improve its expected payoff. For each transformed game, meta-payoffs are determined by the unique Bayesian Nash equilibrium of that game. Using Kakutani's fixed point theorem, we establish existence under finiteness assumptions on type spaces, meta-actions, and transformations, together with the assumption that each transformed game admits a unique Bayesian Nash equilibrium. Several illustrative examples, including adaptive subsidy competition, cybersecurity protocol selection, and platform rule formation, demonstrate that private information at the meta-level plays an essential role in endogenous game transformation. The framework contains both classical Bayesian games and complete-information meta-games as special cases.

2026-05-16T10:37:06Z Madjid Eshaghi Gordji Esmaiel Abounoori Mohamadali Berahman http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01080v2 2026-05-16T04:20:13Z

We study a principal-agent problem with adverse selection, where the principal does not know the agent's true cost but must design a contract to optimize a specific criterion. Unlike standard screening frameworks that allow for self-selection, we assume the principal can only offer a unique contract. We show that the agent's optimization problem can be reformulated as a stochastic target problem. After characterizing the credible domain of this target problem, we show that the principal's objective can be solved as a stochastic optimal control problem with partial information and state constraints. The description of the credible domain also allows us to obtain the value of screening contracts.

2026-05-01T20:24:19Z Guillermo Alonso Alvarez Ibrahim Ekren Liwei Huang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16695v1 2026-05-15T23:18:50Z

This paper introduces the theoretical framework for combining Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanisms with the Consensus Planning Protocol (CPP) to enable truthful and efficient collaboration between a retailer and vendors to lower joint Cost to Serve. We demonstrate how this integration preserves both dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and efficiency in high-dimensional environments. We further introduce an activity fee design to improve its revenue property for the retailer while maintaining the mechanism's desirable properties. This CPP-VCG framework serves as the theoretical foundation for designing collaborative mechanisms to coordinates distributed, agent-based optimization between retailers and suppliers.

2026-05-15T23:18:50Z Dirk Bergemann Garrett van Ryzin Jiaxuan Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15955v5 2026-05-15T18:31:11Z

We analyze incomplete-information games where an oracle publicly shares information with players. One oracle dominates another if, in every game, it can match the set of equilibrium outcomes induced by the latter. Distinct characterizations are provided for deterministic and stochastic signaling functions, based on simultaneous posterior matching, partition refinements, and common knowledge components. This study extends the work of Blackwell (1951) to games, and expands the study of Aumann (1976) on common knowledge, along with the companion Part II, which develops a theory of information loops.

2025-05-21T19:16:03Z David Lagziel Ehud Lehrer Tao Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04336v2 2026-05-15T17:56:34Z

We study a contest-theoretic model of adversarial investment in which an attacker and a defender allocate resources to AI-augmented capabilities across multiple attack surfaces. The attacker's investment operates through two channels: it amplifies offensive potency unconditionally and erodes defensive effectiveness conditionally, generating an adversarial discount that deepens endogenously with the defender's own investment. We derive a closed-form arms race ratio decomposing the relative marginal effectiveness of offensive and defensive investment into six structural primitives and establish equilibrium uniqueness and global convergence under a continuous best-response dynamic. The central result concerns signal cross-correlation, the degree to which threat intelligence on one surface informs detection on another. With full cross-correlation, the arms race ratio is independent of the number of attack surfaces: the attacker's structural advantage from surface proliferation is completely neutralized. Under the benchmark full-dilution case, without cross-correlation, per-surface defense effectiveness vanishes as the attack surface grows. Extending the analysis to heterogeneous defenders facing an attacker who targets by expected value, we argue that the model points to a dual inefficiency: overinvestment in private defense (a zero-sum redirective externality) and underinvestment in shared signal correlation (a public good). These formal results, together with public-good reasoning outside the base model, characterize when collective information aggregation can dominate private capability investment as the decisive margin in adversarial contests.

2026-05-05T22:43:07Z James W. Bono http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11673v2 2026-05-15T12:46:07Z

Restricting individuals' access to some opportunities may steer their desire toward their substitutes, a phenomenon known as the forbidden fruit effect. We axiomatize a choice model named restriction-sensitive choice (RSC), which rationalizes the forbidden fruit effect and is compatible with the prominent psychological explanations: reactance theory and commodity theory. The model is identifiable from choice data, specifically from the observation of choice reversals caused by the removal of options. We conduct a normative analysis both in terms of the agent's freedom and welfare. We apply our model to shed light on two phenomena: the backfire effect of beliefs and the backlash of integration policies targeted towards minorities.

2025-09-15T08:11:59Z Niels Boissonnet Alexis Ghersengorin http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22847v1 2026-05-15T10:02:59Z

The space L of linear value maps on a finite-player cooperative game G^N is finite-dimensional, and admits a canonical inner product induced by the Harsanyi-dividend decomposition of G^N. We show that this inner product is intrinsic: the same value arises from any orthonormal basis of G^N with respect to the Harsanyi inner product. Within this geometry, the subspace L^{ESL} of efficient, symmetric, linear value maps admits a clean structure theorem. The induced orthogonal stratification of L by coalition size yields a canonical linear isomorphism L^{ESL} = R^{n-1}, under which every efficient symmetric linear value map decomposes uniquely into n-1 stratified epsilons, one per coalition size. The classical egalitarian Shapley family of Joosten (1996) is precisely the diagonal slice of this R^{n-1}. The orthogonal projection of any Psi in L^{ESL} onto this diagonal yields an optimal parameter eps*(Psi) equal to the weighted mean of the stratified epsilons under an explicit probability distribution {w_a} over coalition sizes, and the goodness-of-fit R^2(Psi) equals one minus the relative weighted variance of those epsilons. The framework is a literal regression-statistics analogue of the coefficient of determination. At n=4 it produces a clean three-way classification of the standard alternatives to the Shapley value: the Banzhaf value is nearly orthogonal to the egalitarian Shapley axis (R^2 ~ 1%); the equal-surplus-division value is moderately aligned (R^2 ~ 38%); the solidarity value is almost entirely aligned (R^2 ~ 99.6%). Asymptotically R^2(ESD) -> 1, R^2(So) -> 1, and R^2(Bz) -> 1/2, the last reflecting a structural identity between the efficiency defect and the egalitarian-Shapley deviation of the Banzhaf value at every coalition size.

2026-05-15T10:02:59Z 34 pages Frank M. V. Feys http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02871v4 2026-05-15T09:42:38Z

We establish the existence and uniqueness of the equilibrium for a stochastic mean-field game of optimal investment. The analysis covers both finite and infinite time horizons, and the mean-field interaction of the representative company with a mass of identical and indistinguishable firms is modeled through the time-dependent price at which the produced good is sold. At equilibrium, this price is given in terms of a nonlinear function of the expected (optimally controlled) production capacity of the representative company at each time. The proof of the existence and uniqueness of the mean-field equilibrium relies on a priori estimates and the study of nonlinear integral equations, but employs different techniques for the finite and infinite horizon cases. Additionally, we investigate the deterministic counterpart of the mean-field game under study.

2024-04-03T17:08:23Z Alessandro Calvia Salvatore Federico Giorgio Ferrari Fausto Gozzi http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22846v1 2026-05-15T08:50:44Z

We develop an abstract axiomatic theory of tie-breaking. A tie-breaking input consists of a finite set N of players, a weak order on N representing the standings to be refined, and an auxiliary information item drawn from a set on which the symmetric group Sym(N) acts. Within this minimal framework we prove three theorems. First, no tie-breaking rule producing a strict linear order can be anonymous, provided the input space contains even one intrinsically symmetric situation, a condition met in essentially every realistic application. Second, when we allow the rule to output a partition of N (rather than a strict ranking), there is a unique rule satisfying two natural axioms: it is the partition of N into orbits of the joint stabilizer of the input. Third, every reasonable strict tie-breaking rule decomposes uniquely as the canonical orbit partition followed by an arbitrary completion. The decomposition makes precise the informal observation that real tie-breaking systems are honest until forced to be arbitrary. The framework is broad enough to capture chess tournament tie-breakers, sports league regulations, voting tie-breakers, tie-breaking among symmetric players in cooperative games, and ranking by network centrality measures, all within a single uniform formalism.

2026-05-15T08:50:44Z 31 pages, 1 figure. Submitted to Social Choice and Welfare Frank M. V. Feys http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15644v1 2026-05-15T05:49:52Z

Macroeconomic dynamics is typically modeled under the assumption that the economy evolves according to a single invariant law of motion. This paper shows that this assumption imposes a structural restriction. We develop Dynamic Macroeconomics with Multiple Regimes (DMR), a framework in which economic evolution is governed by multiple regime-specific propagation operators. As a result, trajectories arise from ordered compositions of heterogeneous operators rather than from the iteration of a single mapping. We establish three structural results. First, invariant-law and regime-dependent systems are not topologically equivalent. Second, regime dependence is dynamically irreducible: it cannot be eliminated through any injective transformation of the state space. Third, whenever regime operators fail to commute, there exists no map $F:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^n$ whose iterates reproduce all regime-admissible trajectories. These results establish a structural separation between invariant-law macroeconomics and regime-dependent dynamics, implying that stability, policy evaluation, and structural characterization must be conducted at the level of interacting propagation operators rather than within a single invariant mapping.

2026-05-15T05:49:52Z 24 pages Jorge R. Chávez F http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04827v4 2026-05-15T05:18:09Z

We study stochastic choice across decision problems, each represented as a menu of action labels paired with observable outcome vectors. We propose a consistency condition for behavior in decision problems composed of two separable components: choice probabilities must agree with those obtained when each component is considered in isolation. Together with monotonicity and continuity, this separability requirement characterizes the family of random coefficients logit rules.

2023-12-08T04:52:52Z 46 pages Fedor Sandomirskiy Po Hyun Sung Omer Tamuz Ben Wincelberg http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17061v3 2026-05-14T23:41:42Z

In the context of aggregating von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities, we show that bounded violations of the Pareto conditions characterize aggregation rules that are approximately utilitarian. When a single utility function is intended to represent the preference judgments of a group of individuals and the Pareto principles are nearly satisfied, we prove that its distance from a weighted sum of individual cardinal utilities does not exceed half of the positive parameter that differentiates our weaker versions of the Pareto conditions from their conventional forms. This result suggests the stability of Harsanyi's (1955) aggregation theorem, in that small deviations from the Pareto principles lead to aggregation rules that remain close to utilitarian aggregation.

2025-04-23T19:11:11Z typos and minor mistakes in the appendix corrected Leandro Nascimento http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02740v2 2026-05-14T17:26:41Z

We consider voting rules in settings where voters' identities are difficult to verify. Voters can manipulate the process by casting multiple votes under different identities or abstaining from voting. Immunities to such manipulations are called \emph{false-name-proofness} and \emph{participation}, respectively. For the universal domain of (strict) preferences, these properties together imply \emph{anonymity} and are incompatible with \emph{neutrality}. For the domain of preferences defined over all subsets of a given set of objects, both \emph{false-name-proofness} and \emph{participation} cannot be met by rules that are also \emph{onto}, \emph{object neutral}, and \emph{tops-only}. However, when preferences over subsets of objects are restricted to be separable, all these properties can be satisfied. Furthermore, the domain of separable preferences is maximal for these properties.

2025-03-04T16:03:31Z Agustin G. Bonifacio Federico Fioravanti