https://arxiv.org/api/8UcIYWfzv2zDAUuEG5XNTql4zGw2026-06-21T13:42:12Z405918015http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19326v2Delegated Contracting2026-05-21T13:56:57ZA principal contracts with an agent through an informed delegate. Although the principal cannot directly mediate the interaction, she can restrict the menus of contracts the delegate may offer. We characterize the outcomes implementable through delegated contracting: they are exactly those achievable by a centralized Bayesian mechanism that is dominant-strategy incentive compatible and ex-post individually rational for the agent. We use this result to identify the optimal contractual restrictions in several settings. First, an organization that procures through a budget-indulgent agency should grant full flexibility below an expected spending cap. Second, unlike centralized mechanisms, delegated contracting can never dissolve partnerships efficiently, highlighting a limit to delegated authority. Finally, a seller can entrust sales to an intermediary without revenue loss by combining a resale price agreement with a buyback policy.2025-08-26T17:26:44ZComments: 51 pages; expanded introduction and related literature, added extensions to interdependent values and multi-agent settings, substantially revised procurement and efficiency applications, new analysis of contracting rights and buy-sell clauses, exposition and references improvedJoão TherezeFuqua School of Business, Duke UniversityUdayan VaidyaFuqua School of Business, Duke Universityhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13274v3The Nexus between Dataization and Technological Progress in General Equilibrium of Macroeconomics2026-05-21T12:34:37ZIn this paper, we construct an analytical model of the data economy with empirical evidence to explain the nexus between dataization and technological progress in general equilibrium. Data originates from the dataization of firm total output and contributes to the formation and enhancement of technology. Firms use the production function with data to solve the optimal investment, while households use the endogenous interest rate from the firm problem to solve the optimal consumption. We find that dataization has a negative moderating effect on the transition of general equilibrium affected by technological progress. Policy can only facilitate a positive transition in general equilibrium by simultaneously encouraging dataization and technological progress. Furthermore, when equilibrium capital stock is in a stationary state, dataization enhances technological progress at high levels. However, when equilibrium consumption is in a stationary state, dataization enhances technological progress at low levels while weakening it at high levels. Our empirical analysis uses macroeconomic data and policy from Chinese cities between 2000 and 2021 to verify the theories proposed in this paper. We further apply the Mean Field Games in a continuous-time framework to provide an extended explanation for the nexus between dataization and technological progress in partial equilibrium.2025-07-17T16:29:25Z47 pages, 17 figuresYongheng Huhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19176v3Visibly Fair Mechanisms2026-05-21T04:27:15ZPriority-based allocation of individuals to positions are pervasive, and elimination of justified envy is often, an absolute requirement. This leaves serial dictatorship (SD) as the only rule that avoids justified envy under standard direct mechanisms. What if SD outcomes are undesirable from a designer's perspective? We propose visible fairness, which demands fairness relative to the (potentially purposefully incomplete) preference information the mechanism elicits. Visibly fair mechanisms generalize SD; we fully characterize them and provide necessary and sufficient conditions for strategy-proofness. We show how to apply these results to design strategy-proof visibly fair rules that satisfy a broad class of distributional objectives. Visible fairness, however, results in a new information-efficiency trade-off: meeting distributional goals leads to the avoidance of eliciation of information about preferences that could prevent inefficiencies.2025-06-23T22:40:21ZInácio BóGian CaspariManshu Khannahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06007v5Paying and Persuading2026-05-21T01:57:36ZI study dynamic contracting where Sender privately observes a Markovian state and seeks to motivate Receiver, who acts. Sender provides incentives in two ways: payments, which alter payoffs ex-post, and (Bayesian) persuasion, which shapes Receiver interim beliefs about payoffs. For all stage game payoffs, discount rates, and Markov transition rules, transfers are a last resort--there is an optimal contract where payments occur only after Sender commits to reveal the state at every continuation history. In an example, the optimal contract is a loyalty program: Sender chooses the static optimal information structure until a random promotion time, after which Sender reveals the state and pays Receiver.2025-03-08T01:54:36ZDaniel Luohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21656v1Why Efficient Reforms Fail: Endogenous Game Transformation under Status Quo Bias and Social Preferences2026-05-20T19:10:53ZWhy do societies remain stuck in inferior institutions even when superior al ternatives are widely recognized? This paper develops a model in which agents choose not only actions within a game but also transformations of the game it self. Transformations may be soft, changing payoffs through taxes or subsidies, or hard, changing feasibility through deletion or replacement of actions. Within a coordination model with status-quo bias (switching cost) and boundedly rational play (logit quantal response), we show that these interventions are qualitatively different: finite taxes shift behavior continuously but cannot eliminate residual use of the inherited action, whereas deletion bypasses inertia by removing the action from the feasible set. We further characterize how antagonistic social preferences at the meta level can block reforms that are individually beneficial for every player. The framework provides a formal rationale for why hard feasibility restrictions of ten dominate soft price incentives under inertia, with direct applications to climate transition (carbon tax vs. fossil-fuel phase-out) and platform regulation (fines vs. deletion of addictive features).2026-05-20T19:10:53ZMadjid Eshaghi GordjiMohammadali BerahmanHasti Eshaghihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21647v1Strategic Inertia and Institutional Change:A Behavioral Model of Price Reforms versus Action Deletion2026-05-20T18:59:14ZWhy do inefficient practices, technologies, or institutions persist even when su perior alternatives are available? This paper introduces a quantal response equilib rium with status-quo bias (QRE-SB) in which each player incurs a fixed switching cost when deviating from an inherited default action. In a binary coordination game, we compare two policy interventions: a tax on the default action (price-only reform) versus deleting the default action entirely (ban). We prove that there exists a threshold tax below which the status quo persists and above which a transition occurs; notably, this threshold does not depend on the degree of bounded ratio nality. Deleting the default action always forces play to the superior equilibrium, irrespective of switching costs or rationality. Moreover, when the superior equilib rium is Pareto-dominant, deletion yields strictly higher expected welfare than any finite tax that leaves the old action feasible. Numerical simulations illustrate the theoretical predictions. The framework provides a formal foundation for the policy principle that sometimes you must ban, not just tax, with direct applications to climate policy, social media regulation, and international sanctions.2026-05-20T18:59:14ZMadjid Eshaghi GordjiMohammadali BerahmanHasti Eshaghihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01985v3From Technical Feasibility to Substitutability: A Geometric Theory of Differentiation2026-05-20T14:17:44ZWe study horizontal differentiation when the set of feasible products is a structured subset of the Lancasterian characteristics space. Modeling this set as a compact Riemannian manifold, we show that intrinsic geometry governs substitutability and thereby determines market outcomes. We establish that production constraints induce sectional curvature, which controls the elasticity of technological substitution. Negative curvature amplifies technological divergence and attenuates competitive pressure, whereas positive curvature compresses technological distances and intensifies competition. This mapping yields a characterization of spatial competition in which equilibrium existence and stability are determined by geometric primitives. In particular, we show that sufficiently negative curvature and high dimensionality stabilize minimum differentiation, while continuous symmetries preclude it. The analysis provides a microfoundation linking technological constraints, through the geometry of the feasible set, to endogenous regimes of market power.2025-06-27T13:04:08Z6 pages, 5 figures, 4 appendicesAldric LabartheYann Kerzrehohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21117v1When Do Markets Work? Multiplex Networks and Efficiency2026-05-20T12:47:30ZWe study an Arrow-Debreu economy with externalities generated by multiplex networks. Market equilibrium prices reflect both the preferences and scarcity of goods, consumers' network centralities arising from goods' externalities, as well as linkages across goods (layers) through the budget constraint. Despite the presence of externalities, competitive markets can still be efficient: the First and Second Welfare Theorems hold if either all networks are regular or all layers share the same network structure. When markets allocate goods inefficiently, a Lindahl equilibrium-implemented through personalized prices-can restore efficiency, but may leave some consumers worse off.2026-05-20T12:47:30ZChengqing LiYves ZenouJunjie Zhouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17413v6Voting with Partial Orders: The Plurality and Anti-Plurality Classes2026-05-20T10:23:41ZIn the theory of voting, the Plurality rule for preferences that come in the form of linear orders selects the alternatives most frequently appearing in the first position of those orders, while the Anti-Plurality rule selects the alternatives least often occurring in the final position. We explore extensions of these rules to preferences that are partial orders, offering axiomatic characterisations for them.2024-04-26T13:43:26ZUlle EndrissFederico Fioravantihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21122v3Sequential Elimination and Union Shapley Value for Group Assessment in Coalitional Games2026-05-20T08:18:11ZTwo straightforward methods to extend an assessment of individual elements to groups are to sum individual assessments or to treat the group as a single merged element and assess it accordingly. In this work, we analyze another natural approach based on sequential elimination: elements of the group are removed one by one, and their assessments are aggregated. We study this approach in the context of coalitional games and show that, for almost all semivalues, it does not depend on the order of players. In particular, we introduce a new group value, called the Union Shapley Value, and investigate its axiomatic properties.
Our results build on a comprehensive analysis of group values in coalitional games. Specifically, we define a class of group (weak consistent) semivalues - a variant of semivalues satisfying a weak form of monotonicity. This framework allows us to clarify the differences between existing notions in the literature. We show that existing group values either assess the total worth of a group or measure its synergy. We distinguish these two approaches axiomatically and uncover a connection between the corresponding values. In particular, we show that the well-known Interaction Index is a synergistic counterpart of the value introduced by Marichal et al., which corresponds to the merge approach. The analysis also yields new synergistic group values associated with the Union Shapley Value, which we call the Intersection Shapley Value. Our results demonstrate that the sequential extension - and the Union Shapley value in particular - constitute one of the most natural extensions of player values to groups in coalitional games.2025-05-27T12:41:49ZPiotr KępczyńskiOskar Skibskihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20679v1Testing a Graph-Theoretic Condition for Aggregating Incomplete Rankings: A Technical Note2026-05-20T03:45:33ZThis note shows how Condition 1 in Okumura (2025) can be tested efficiently using a standard graph-theoretic algorithm. It also describes an efficient implementation of Okumura's mechanism.2026-05-20T03:45:33Z5 pages. Technical note supplementing Okumura (2025)Yasunori Okumurahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12140v4Forecasting and Manipulating the Forecasts of Others2026-05-19T22:37:56ZFinite-player dynamic games with dispersed private information are difficult because actions both move payoffs and reshape what opponents learn, generating hierarchies of beliefs about beliefs. This paper provides a recursive representation for this problem. The noise state records agents' beliefs about the underlying shocks that generate histories, so higher-order beliefs are generated by composition rather than tracked as separate state variables. In the canonical continuous-time LQG benchmark, the representation becomes explicit: beliefs, value gradients, and policy rules are deterministic impulse-response functions, and equilibrium is a deterministic fixed point in those functions. Any fixed point in the noise-state linear class is a Nash equilibrium against arbitrary admissible \(L^2\) deviations. The first-order system contains an information wedge, the shadow price of changing opponents' posteriors. In a two-player benchmark, the wedge explains why pooling gains are mostly strategic, why optimal precision allocation can starve an inefficient player of information, and why signal precision changes policy rules themselves, so separation fails.2026-03-12T16:43:21Z27 pages, 6 figuresSam Babichenkohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22865v1Multi-Dimensional Matching in Market Design2026-05-19T19:35:03ZThis paper proposes a computationally efficient mechanism for multi-dimensional matching markets where agents report preferences over object features rather than complete utility assessments. We use Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to identify the principal direction of variation in feature space and match agents to objects along this dimension, reducing a complex multi-dimensional problem to an effectively one-dimensional problem solvable in $O(N \log N)$ time.
We show that when data exhibit low effective dimensionality, our mechanism approximately maximizes Nash Social Welfare, satisfies distributional truthfulness, and achieves symmetry. We establish a novel connection between Nash Social Welfare and Geometric Distributionally Robust Optimization, providing robustness guaranties. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves 99\% optimal welfare while running three orders of magnitude faster than direct optimization. The framework applies naturally to school choice, labor markets, and course allocation, where feature-based elicitation reduces the cognitive burden on agents.2026-05-19T19:35:03Z27 pagesIrene Aldridgehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20152v1Caputo-Type Memory Invariants: A Fractional Generalization of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function2026-05-19T17:41:43ZStandard dynamical systems approaches to economic modeling, such as those deriving the Cobb-Douglas and CES production functions from exponential growth trajectories, typically rely on integer-order differential equations. While effective, these models assume that economic output depends solely on the instantaneous state of capital and labor, effectively ignoring the long-term ``memory effects'' inherent in policy, infrastructure, and technological adoption.
This paper extends the exponential framework by introducing the Caputo fractional derivative into the underlying dynamical systems governing factor inputs. By replacing standard growth rates with fractional-order counterparts of order $0 < α\le 1$, we model economic trajectories where the rate of change is a non-local function of the system's entire history. We demonstrate that the Mittag-Leffler function emerges as the natural growth solution in this context, providing a nested generalization of the classical exponential model.
Using this fractional approach, we derive a new class of time-independent invariants that serve as generalized production functions. We show that as the fractional order approaches unity, these forms converge exactly to the classical Cobb-Douglas function.2026-05-19T17:41:43ZRoman G. Smirnovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02456v5When Does Static Willingness to Pay Mislead? A Framework for Dynamic Hedonic Valuation2026-05-19T17:34:02ZMany policy counterfactuals depend on how consumers value product attributes such as sugar, sodium, caffeine, alcohol, or emissions. Standard hedonic and differentiated-products models interpret these valuations statically. That interpretation is restrictive when attributes are habit forming: observed prices then reflect both contemporaneous marginal value and the continuation value generated by current consumption. I develop a nonparametric revealed-preference framework for dynamic hedonic valuation, deriving necessary and sufficient conditions for rationalising observed prices and choices. Using household scanner data on cereal purchases, I show that the hedonic representation places real restrictions on prices, while habit formation improves behavioural coherence conditional on that representation. The results provide a diagnostic for when static attribute valuation is justified and when prices reveal more than contemporaneous marginal values.2026-03-02T22:57:30ZJosephine Auer