https://arxiv.org/api/8UcIYWfzv2zDAUuEG5XNTql4zGw 2026-03-26T12:39:35Z 3826 180 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09189v2 2026-02-17T22:42:51Z

India implements the world's most complex affirmative action program through vertical and horizontal reservations. Although applicants can belong to at most one vertical category, they can qualify for multiple horizontal reservation categories simultaneously. We examine resource allocation problems in India, where horizontal reservations follow a hierarchical structure within a one-to-all horizontal matching framework. We introduce the hierarchical choice rule and show that it selects the most meritorious set of applicants. We thoroughly analyze the properties of the aggregate choice rule, which comprises hierarchical choice rules across all vertical categories. We show that the generalized deferred acceptance mechanism, when coupled with this aggregate choice rule, is the unique stable and strategy-proof mechanism that eliminates justified envy.

2026-02-09T20:52:49Z arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2310.02660 Orhan Aygün Bertan Turhan http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05504v4 2026-02-17T20:44:10Z

We explore whether ambiguous communication can be beneficial to the sender in a persuasion problem, when the receiver (and possibly the sender) is ambiguity averse. Our analysis highlights the necessity of using a collection of experiments that form a splitting of an obedient experiment. Some experiments in the collection must be Pareto-ranked in that both players agree on their payoff ranking. If an optimal Bayesian persuasion experiment can be split in this way, then any not-too-ambiguity-averse sender as well as the receiver benefit. There are no benefits when the receiver has only two actions.

2024-10-07T21:20:00Z Xiaoyu Cheng Peter Klibanoff Sujoy Mukerji Ludovic Renou http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15986v1 2026-02-17T20:23:29Z

We study convergence rates of random-order best-response dynamics in games on networks with linear best responses and strategic substitutes. Combining formal analysis with numerical simulations we identify phenomena that lead to slow convergence. One of the key such phenomena is convergence to stable strategy profiles in parts of the network neighboring sets of nodes which remain inactive until the dynamics is close to converging and then switch to activity, initiating convergence to profiles with a new set of active agents and possibly leading to another iteration of such behavior. We identify structural properties of graphs which make such phenomena more likely. These properties go beyond the spectrum of a graph, which we demonstrate analyzing convergence rates on co-spectral mates.

2026-02-17T20:23:29Z Wojciech Misiak Marcin Dziubiński http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15957v1 2026-02-17T19:17:50Z

Complex change is often described as "evolutionary" in economics, policy, and technology, yet most system dynamics models remain constrained to fixed state spaces and equilibrium-seeking behavior. This paper argues that evolutionary dynamics should be treated as a core system-thinking problem rather than as a biological metaphor. We introduce Stability-Driven Assembly (SDA) as a minimal, non-equilibrium framework in which stochastic interactions combined with differential persistence generate endogenous selection without genes, replication, or predefined fitness functions. In SDA, longer-lived patterns accumulate in the population, biasing future interactions and creating feedback between population composition and system dynamics. This feedback yields fitness-proportional sampling as an emergent property, realizing a natural genetic algorithm driven solely by stability. Using SDA, we demonstrate why equilibrium-constrained models, even when simulated numerically, cannot exhibit open-ended evolution: evolutionary systems require population-dependent, non-stationary dynamics in which structure and dynamics co-evolve. We conclude by discussing implications for system dynamics, economics, and policy modeling, and outline how agent-based and AI-enabled approaches may support evolutionary models capable of sustained novelty and structural emergence.

2026-02-17T19:17:50Z 17 pages, 5 figures Dan Adler http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09424v3 2026-02-17T17:25:28Z

We consider an agent with a rationally inattentive preference over menus of acts, as in de Oliveira et al (2017). We show that two axioms, Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Ignorance Equivalence, are necessary and sufficient for this agent to have a posterior-separable cost satisfying a mild smoothness condition, called joint-directional differentiability. Viewing the decision-maker's problem as a Bayesian persuasion problem, we also show that these axioms are necessary and sufficient for solvability by a unique hyperplane. When the cost function remains invariant for different priors, we show that these axioms imply uniformly posterior separable costs that are differentiable.

2025-11-12T15:38:31Z Henrique de Oliveira Jeffrey Mensch http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15686v1 2026-02-17T16:10:48Z

Minimizing volatility and adjustment costs is of central importance in many economic environments, yet it is often complicated by evolving feasibility constraints. We study a decision maker who repeatedly selects an action from a stochastically evolving interval of feasible actions in order to minimize either average adjustment costs or variance. We show that for strictly convex adjustment costs (such as quadratic variation), the optimal decision rule is a reference rule in which the decision maker minimizes the distance to a target action. In general, the optimal target depends both on the previous action and the expectation of future constraints; but for the special case where the constraints follow a random walk, the optimal mechanism is to simply target the previous action. If the decision maker minimizes variance, the optimal policy is also a reference rule, but the target is a constant, which is not necessarily equal to the long-term average action. Compared to mid-point heuristics, these optimal rules may substantially reduce quadratic variation and variance, in natural environments by $50\%$ or more. Applied to stock market auctions, our results provide an explanation for the wide-spread use of reference price rules. We also apply our results to bilateral trade in over-the-counter markets, capacity planning in supply chains, and positioning in political agenda setting.

2026-02-17T16:10:48Z Simon Jantschgi Heinrich H. Nax Bary S. R. Pradelski Marek Pycia http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15674v1 2026-02-17T15:55:22Z

We propose a tractable unified framework to study the evolution and interaction of model-misspecification concerns and complexity aversion in repeated decision problems. This aims to capture environments where decision makers worry that their models are misspecified while also disliking overly complex models. We find that pathological cycles caused by endogenous concerns for misspecification can be eliminated by penalizing complex models and show that such preferences for simplicity tend to favor safety, which can enhance welfare in the long run. We use our framework to provide new microfoundations for pervasive empirical phenomena such as "scale heterogeneity" in discrete-choice analysis, "probability neglect" in behavioral economics, and "home bias" in international finance.

2026-02-17T15:55:22Z Drew Fudenberg Florian Mudekereza http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15483v4 2026-02-17T12:03:42Z

Fixed point theorems are ubiquitous in economic research. Many studies cite Smithson (1971) ``Fixed points of order preserving multifunctions,'' yet the original proof contains errors. This note presents a new, concise proof and explains why Smithson's argument is invalid. It also contains new results on the structure of the set of fixed points and monotone comparative statics.

2023-03-27T00:09:58Z Haruki Kono Mark Voorneveld http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15246v1 2026-02-16T22:56:32Z

We study how a decision-maker (DM) learns from data of unknown quality to form robust, ''general-purpose'' posterior beliefs. We develop a framework for robust learning and belief formation under a minimax-regret criterion, cast as a zero-sum game: the DM chooses posterior beliefs to minimize ex-ante regret, while an adversarial Nature selects the data-generating process (DGP). We show that, in large samples of $n$ signal draws, Nature optimally induces ambiguity by choosing a process whose precision converges to the uninformative signals at the rate $1/\sqrt{n}$. As a result, learning against the adversarial DGP is nontrivial as well as incomplete: the DM's ex-ante regret remains strictly positive even with an infinite amount of data. However, when the true DGP is fixed and informative (even if only slightly), our DM with a robust updating rule eventually learns the state with enough data. Still, learning occurs at a sub-exponential rate -- quantifying the asymptotic price of robustness -- and it exhibits ''under-inference'' bias. Our framework provides a decision-theoretic dual to the local alternatives method in asymptotic statistics, deriving the characteristic $1/\sqrt{n}$-scaling endogenously from the signal ambiguity.

2026-02-16T22:56:32Z Yeon-Koo Che Longjian Li Tianling Luo http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22862v3 2026-02-16T22:05:42Z

Motivated by applications such as cloud computing, gig platforms, and blockchain auctions, we study optimal selling mechanisms for dynamic markets with stochastic supply and demand. In our model, buyers with private valuations and homogeneous goods arrive stochastically and can be held in queues at a cost. The optimal mechanism pairs allocative efficiency with dynamic admission control: goods are assigned to the highest-value buyer, while entry is restricted by value thresholds that strictly increase with the queue length and decrease with available inventory. This policy smooths competitive pressure across time and is implemented in dominant strategies via auctions with dynamic reserve prices.

2025-05-28T20:51:12Z Yeon-Koo Che Andrew B. Choi http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23640v2 2026-02-16T16:37:56Z

We argue that negative skew and positive mean of the distribution of stock returns are largely due to the broken symmetry of stochastic volatility governing gains and losses. Starting with stochastic differential equations for stock returns and for stochastic volatility we argue that the distribution of stock returns can be effectively split in two -- for gains and losses -- assuming difference in parameters of their respective stochastic volatilities. A modified Jones-Faddy skew t-distribution utilized here allows to reflect this in a single organic distribution which tends to meaningfully capture this asymmetry. We illustrate its application on distribution of daily S&P500 returns, including analysis of its tails.

2025-12-29T17:52:14Z 19 pages, 19 figures, 2 tables Economies 2026, 14(3), 84; https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/14/3/84 Siqi Shao Arshia Ghasemi Hamed Farahani R. A. Serota 10.3390/economies14030084 http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17622v3 2026-02-16T15:47:05Z

We study fairness-accuracy tradeoffs when a single predictive model must serve multiple demographic groups. A useful tool for understanding this tradeoff is the fairness-accuracy (FA) Pareto frontier, which characterizes the set of models that cannot be improved in either fairness or accuracy without worsening the other. While characterizing the FA frontier requires full knowledge of the data distribution, we focus on the finite-sample regime, quantifying how well a designer can approximate any point on the frontier from limited data and bounding the worst-case gap. In particular, we derive worst-case-optimal estimators that depend on the designer's knowledge of the covariate distribution. For each estimator, we characterize how finite-sample effects asymmetrically impact each group's welfare and identify optimal sample allocation strategies. Finally, we provide uniform finite-sample bounds for the entire FA frontier, yielding confidence bands that quantify the reliability of welfare comparisons across alternative fairness-accuracy tradeoffs.

2025-08-25T03:01:35Z Alireza Fallah Michael I. Jordan Annie Ulichney http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14816v1 2026-02-16T15:09:16Z

A central problem in multiagent systems is the fair assignment of objects to agents. In this paper, we initiate the analysis of classic majoritarian social choice functions in assignment. Exploiting the special structure of the assignment domain, we show a number of surprising results with no counterparts in general social choice. In particular, we establish a near one-to-one correspondence between preference profiles and majority graphs. This correspondence implies that key properties of assignments -- such as Pareto-optimality, least unpopularity, and mixed popularity -- can be determined solely by the associated majority graph. We further show that all Pareto-optimal assignments are semi-popular and belong to the top cycle. Elements of the top cycle can thus easily be found via serial dictatorships. Our main result is a complete characterization of the top cycle, which implies the top cycle can only consist of one, two, all but two, all but one, or all assignments. By contrast, we find that the uncovered set contains only very few assignments.

2026-02-16T15:09:16Z Appears in the 25th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), 2026 Felix Brandt Haoyuan Chen Chris Dong Patrick Lederer Alexander Schlenga http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06753v5 2026-02-16T12:53:50Z

Revised proofs of Kenneth Arrow's impossibility theorem have been presented in prose form, incorporating novel ideas such as decisive sets and pivotal voters. This study develops another approach to proving the theorem. Using a proof calculus in formal logic, we construct a proof with a full mathematical representation. While previous proofs emphasize intuitive accessibility, this one focuses on meticulous derivation and reveals the global structure of the social welfare function central to the theorem.

2023-09-13T06:58:07Z Typos corrected Kazuya Yamamoto http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12272v2 2026-02-16T10:49:57Z

Current macroeconomic models with agent heterogeneity can be broadly divided into two main groups. Heterogeneous-agent general equilibrium (GE) models, such as those based on Heterogeneous Agent New Keynesian (HANK) or Krusell-Smith (KS) approaches, rely on GE and 'rational expectations', somewhat unrealistic assumptions that make the models very computationally cumbersome, which in turn limits the amount of heterogeneity that can be modelled. In contrast, agent-based models (ABMs) can flexibly encompass a large number of arbitrarily heterogeneous agents, but typically require the specification of explicit behavioural rules, which can lead to a lengthy trial-and-error model-development process. To address these limitations, we introduce MARL-BC, a framework that integrates deep multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) with real business cycle (RBC) models. We demonstrate that MARL-BC can: (1) recover textbook RBC results when using a single agent; (2) recover the results of the mean-field KS model using a large number of identical agents; and (3) effectively simulate rich heterogeneity among agents, a hard task for traditional GE approaches. Our framework can be thought of as an ABM if used with a variety of heterogeneous interacting agents, and can reproduce GE results in limit cases. As such, it is a step towards a synthesis of these often opposed modelling paradigms.

2025-10-14T08:26:18Z 14 pages, 10 figures Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2026, https://cyprusconferences.org/aamas2026/) Federico Gabriele Aldo Glielmo Marco Taboga 10.65109/VZHC1838